‘School-Based Assessment — Paper 03/1 PORTFOLIO Each candidate will compile a portfolio on a theme selected, det>rmined by the candidate and approved by the teacher. The portfolio should be internally cohereit and be organised under four sections as follows L General Introduction (12 marks) This section should be no more than 200 words. \t should rélate to the other three sections, identifying the theme selected and the purpose of selecting it dnd showing how it relates to the candidate's academic, work-related and personal interests, Exposition (16 marks) This section of the portfolio will be orally presented and examined. ‘The duration should be ‘no more than 10 minutes per candidate. Topics chosen in this section should be current. 4 ‘candidate should collect at least two pieces of related informa ion on the selected topic. A candidate's presentation should be well organised and elfectvely delivered, and should feature: i, a discussion of the issues raised and the challenges experienced in exploring the selected topic; i, an evaluation of the effect of source, context ang medium (or channel) on the reliability and validity of information gathered, (Refer to page 6, content 4c (\). Candidates may bring 10 the examination room a single ewe card, 4” by 6", with headings (and nothing else) related to their presentation. Teachers must ensure that ‘each candidate's card s free of addtional information Reflection (14 marks) A candidate will create ONE sample of original work which should not exceed 800 words. The sample created should cover ONE literary genre. Please te thatthe sample exeated must relate to the theme selected For this sample, candidates should write a preface ofno mort than 200 words, specifvin: (2) the pupose: ©) the intended audience; ©) the context. Analysis (18 marks) ‘The analysis in this section should not exceed 350 word. Candidates must analyse the sample created under Reflection, The analysis should address any TWO of the following: @) registers; ) dialectal vartarion; 31 exe auunte2 © altitudes to language; @ ‘communicative behaviours. exe aroun 2MARKING CRITERIA FOR SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT GENERAL INTRODUCTION (22 MARKS) (Theme and purpose of portfolio. 2 marks) + Candidate presents theme and purpose clearly 2 marks = Candidate presents theme and purpose, but not clearly OR 1 mark presents only one ofthe clearly = Candidate presents neither theme nor purpose. 0 mark () How theme is treated in the Exposition and Reflection sections 4 marks) : Candidate explains how theme is developed in both sevtions, and 4 marks how each section contributes to achieving hissher purpose. + Candidate explains how theme is developed in both szctions, but 3 marks explains how only one section contributes to achieving his/her Purpose. + Candidate explains how theme is presented in both sections, but 2 marks does not explain how the sections contribule 10 achieving his/her purpose. + Candidate explains how theme is developed in one saction only, 2 marks and how the latter contributes to achieving his/her purpose. + Candidate explains how theme is developed in one séction only, 7 mark with no futher explanation, + Candidate does not explain how theme is developed in either of 0 mark the sections. (©) How theme relates 0 candidate's academic interests 2 marks) + Candidate explains clearly how theme relates to his/he- academic interests 2 marks + Candidate explains, but not clearly, how theme relatel 10 histher ‘academic interests I mark + Candidate makes no attempt to relate theme to his/he- academic interests 0 mark «| »(d) How theme relates 10 candidate's work-related interests = Candidate explains clearly how theme relates t0 hisiher work- related interests. + Candidate explains, but not clearly, how theme relates| to his/her work-related interests. = Candidate makes no attempt to relate theme to hishher work. related interests (©) How theme relates to candidate's personal interests = Candidate explains clearly how theme relates to his/her personal interests + Candidate explains, but not clearly, how theme relates to his/her ‘personal interests + Candidate makes no attempt to relate theme to his/her personal EXPOSITION (a) Discussion of issues and challenges. + Candidate has a current topic and demonstrates | substantial Imowledge of critical issues related to the topic, is well as considerable appreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. + Candidate has a current topic and demonsivates good knowledge of critical issues related 10 the topic, as well as good appreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. + Candidate has a current topic and demonstrates adequate Rnowledge of critical issues related to the topic, as well as ‘adequate appreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. + Candidate has a current topic but demonstrates weak knowledge of critical issues related fo the topic. as well as weak Appreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. + Candidate has a current topic but demonstrates littld knowledge of critical issues related to the topic, as well as litle éppreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. + Candidate has not chosen a current topic and demenstrates no Inowledge of critical issues related (0 the topic, as|vell as no appreciation of the challenges raised by the issues. | - <1 excaauuia 2 marks) 2 marks J mark 0 mark @ marks) 2 marks I mark 0 mark (16 MARKS) 5 marks) 5 marks 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks J mark 0 marks() Evaluation of the effect of source, context and medium (or channel) on (4 marks) the reliability and validity of information gathered. = Candidate provides an excellent evaluation 4 marks + Candidate provides a good evaluation 3 marks + Candidate provides an unsatisfactory evaluation. 1.2 marks + Candidate provides no evaluation Omark () Organisation (3 marks) + Candidate provides an organisation with introduction, logical 3 marks sequence of ideas, and conclusion. + Candidate provides an organisation with ovo of thy elements 2 marks above, + Candidate provides an organisation with one of the elements I mark above. + Candidate provides no organisation 0 mark (d) Delivery (Audiility, fluency, exe contact body movement, and paralinguistic features such as pauses, throat clearing, pitch and other 4 marks) such) + Candidate speaks with a clear, audible voice throughout and is consistontly: fluent and confident, with excellent paralinguistic 4 marks control. + Candidate generally speaks with a clear, audible voice and is 3 marks mostly fluent and confident, with moderate paralinguis ic control. + Candidate often speaks unclearly and is hardly | fluent or 2 marks confident, with limited paralinguistic control. + Candidate generally speaks unclearly, haltingly and uncertainty, I mark with no paralinguistic control + Candidate does not deliver. 0 mark NB. Students who have severe speech impediments should be exenipt-d from the requirement of fluency. | 8REFLECTION (a) Preface = Candidate provides an excellent treatment of purpoie, audience and context + Candidate provides a very good treatment of purpose, éudience and context. = Candidate provides a good treatment of purpose, audience and context + Candidate provides an unsatisfactory treatment bf purpose, audience and context, (b) — Rest of Reflection sample * (10 marks) + Candidate produces an excellent sample in terms bf creativity organisation, and expression + Candidate produces a very good sample in terms bf creativity, organisation, and expression, + Candidate produces a good sample in terms of creativity, organisation, and expression. + Candidate produces an adequate sample in terms bf creativity, ‘organisation and expression. + Candidate produces an unsatisfactory sample in terms of creativity, organisation, and expression + Candidate produces a weak sample in terms &f creativity, ‘organisation, and expression ANALYSIS. (@) Content + Candidate provides an excellent analysis of the bvo elements selected. + Candidate provides a very good analysis of the [wo elements selected. + Candidate provides a good analysis of the to element; selected. + Candidate provides an unsatisfactory analysis of the fwo elements selected + Candidate provides a weak analysis of the two elements selected. (14 MARKS) (4 marks) 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 0-1 mark 10 marks 8-9 marks 6-7 marks 4-5 marks 2:3 marks 0-1 mark (18 MARKS) (8 marks) 8 marks 6-7 marks 4-5 marks 2-3 marks 0-1 mark “Grenaton cor neato fesopn cls hens ese ahora ee is nds eeaes/ ogap hy, presi acter: propatenes of reper ogee; guna Ings lave purtion romain bin: ctl protein S| 7() Expression Candidate's analysis is clear and fluent and there| is excellent control of grammar and syntax. Candidate's analysis is clear and fluent and there ark hardly any errors of grammar and syntax. Candidate's anaiysis is clear and fluent but there are several errors of grammar and syntax. Candidate's analysis is clear but not fluent, and there are many errors of grammar and syntax. Candidate's analysis is incoherent and there are may errors of grammar and syntax. (©) Organisation (introduction, development, conclusion, coherence, links from paragraph to paragraph) Candidate demonstrates excellent organisation Candidate demonstrates very good organisation Candidate demonstrates good organisation Candidate demonstrates unsatisfactory organisation. Candidate demonstrates poor organisation. | ” S marks) 5 marks 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 0-1 mark (5 marks) 5 marks 4 marks 3 marks 2 marks 0-1 mark