Answer: Descriptive Research Design/Correlational Survey: Day 1 Enclosure 1
Answer: Descriptive Research Design/Correlational Survey: Day 1 Enclosure 1
Competency:
Chooses appropriate quantitative research design (CS_RS12-IIa-c-1)
Sche References/
Activities Resources
dule
Day 1 Directions: See
Read and understand well the problem stipulated in each situations. Then, Enclosure 1
identify what Descriptive Research Designs should be applied in each topic.
____2. The aim of this research is to identify variables that have some sort of
relationship do the extent that a change in one creates some change in the
other. correlational research studies
____3. The purpose of this type of study is to judge the “goodness of a criterion
measure”. Longitudinal studies establish the changes in that criterion measure
over a long period of time. descriptive evaluative study
___5. This type of research usually involves group comparisons. The groups in
the study make up the value of the independent variable. Descriptive
Comparative Study
Day 3 Directions: Choose the appropriate Quantitative Research Design from the
following research topics provided below. Match the column A to Column B.
A B
1. “Effectiveness pelvic floor muscles a. Solomon Four Group Design
exercise in control of incontinence of
urine”
b. Single group
Direction: Decide what research design you are going to use in conducting
your chosen research topic. Then, support your answer next to your chosen
Research Design as to why you think that that Research Design suits to that
kind of research topic. A rubric is provided below for your guidance.
Topic #2: Labor relations: the latest tendencies and the predictions for the
future. Analyze the contemporary trends in the labor-corporate relationship.
What issues are likely to emerge in 2025-2030? Back up your conclusion with
real-life examples.
ENCLOSURE 1
The Purpose of this design is to be described the status of an identified variable such as
events, people or subjects as they exist. It usually makes some type of comparison
contrasts and correlation and sometimes, in carefully planned and orchestrated descriptive
researches, cause-effect relationships may be established to some extent.
The design requires two groups of equivalent standing in terms of a criterion measure e.g.
achievement or mental ability. The first group is designed as the control group while the
second group is the experimental group. Both groups are given the same pre-test. The
control group is not subjected to a treatment while the experimental group is given the
treatment factor. After the experimental period, both groups are given the same post-test.
The researcher may now conduct a comparison of the post-test results or gains in scores
(post-test-pre-test) between the experimental and control groups. This design is threatened
by certain factors: maturation (or the aging of the subjects from the pre-test to the post-test
period), test-wiseness (or memorizing the contents of the pre-test to score high score on
the post-test) and natural attrition (death of subjects or drop-outs from the experiment).
In experimental conditions where a limited number of subjects are available, the single
group pretest-posttest design may be used. The group is first given a pre-test followed
by the usual treatment and then a post-test is administered. A new pre-test is then
administered to the group followed by the experimental treatment factor and the final
post-test.
This design is very delicate because the researcher must see to it that situations are
equivalent before and during the experimental factor is introduced. As one might
suspect, this design is more open to threats to internal validity such as the Hawthorne
effect (or test-wiseness), maturation and attrition.
A one-group pretest–posttest design is a type of research design that is most often
utilized by behavioral researchers to determine the effect of a treatment or intervention
on a given sample. This research design is characterized by two features.
This makes use of four equivalent groups. The first two groups follow the pre-test-post-test
control group design. The third group is given no pre-test with treatment and a post-test.
The last group is given no pre-test, no treatment but with a post-test. The design eliminates
the Hawthorne effect, effects of maturation and attrition but has the main disadvantage of
acquiring a large number of respondents.
In this design, the subjects are randomly assigned to two study groups and two control
groups. Pre-test measures are used for one of the study groups, and one of the control
groups. Following exposure of the study groups to the intervention or experiment, post-test
measures are collected on all four groups.
Enclosure 2
Descriptive-survey research uses surveys to gather data about varying subjects. This data
aims to know the extent to which different conditions can be obtained among these
subjects.
This way, the researcher can describe the qualifications possessed by the employed
demographics of this community.
This is an extension of the descriptive-survey, with the addition being the normative
element. In the descriptive-normative survey, the results of the study should be compared
with the norm.
For example, an organization that wishes to test the skills of its employees by a team may
have them take a skills test. The skills tests are the evaluation tool in this case, and the
result of this test is compared with the norm of each role.
If the score of the team is one standard deviation above the mean, it is very satisfactory, if
within the mean, satisfactory, and one standard deviation below the mean is unsatisfactory.
Correlational research is a type of research method that involves observing two variables in
order to establish a statistically corresponding relationship between them. The aim of
correlational research is to identify variables that have some sort of relationship do the
extent that a change in one creates some change in the other.
This type of research is descriptive, unlike experimental research that relies entirely on
scientific methodology and hypothesis. For example, correlational research may reveal the
statistical relationship between high-income earners and relocation; that is, the more people
earn, the more likely they are to relocate or not.
The purpose of the descriptive evaluative study is to judge the “goodness of a criterion
measure”. Longitudinal studies establish the changes in that criterion measure over a long
period of time.
Thus, if one were to study the changes in the IQ levels of children 9-10 years over a five-
year period, the researcher must see to it that the same group of children is tested for IQ
over the five-year period.
Cross-sectional studies are designed to evaluate the changes over time by comparing at
the same point in time, different people representing different stages in the development.
For example, to establish changes in IQ for children 9-10 years old, one may
simultaneously test, children 9-10, 11-12, 13-14, 15-16, 17-18, years old to see changes in
criterion measure.
Assessment/Evaluation Studies
This study attempts to determine the effectiveness of efficiency of certain practices or
policies when applied to a group of respondents.
Assessment studies imply measurement of certain key indicators without attaching any
judgement to them. However, evaluation implies putting judgement and valuing to the
measurements obtained and is therefore at a much deeper level than assessment.
Assessment and evaluation always go together for one cannot make judgment without
basis for such.
For example one can make a study on the Relative Effectiveness of the K to 12 program
say six years from today on the basis of such factors as cost, efficiency, and impact on
quality.
Assessment and evaluation studies are fairly common in the Philippines and are often used
as basis for legislation and policy formulation.
This study endeavor to establish significant differences between two or more groups of
subjects on the basis of a criterion measure. No attempts to control the effects of
extraneous factors are made.
For example it may be desired to compare the managerial effectiveness of three groups of
managers A, B, and C. A study may employ a descriptive design which combines two or
more designs mentioned above.
This type of research usually involves group comparisons. The groups in the study make up
the value of the independent variable; for example, gender (male versus female), preschool
attendance versus no school attendance, or children with a working mother versus children
without a working mother.
In comparative research the independent variable is not under the researchers control; that
is, the researcher cannot randomly assign the participants to a gender classification (male
or female) or socioeconomic class, but has to take the value of the independent variable as
they come. The dependent variable is a study is the outcome variable.
Answers Key
Activity 1 Activity 2
1. Descriptive Research Design 1. Descriptive Survey
2. Experimental Research Design 2. Correlational Research Studies
3. Pre-test/Post-test Control Group Design 3. Descriptive Evaluative Study
4. One Group Pre-test – Post-test Design 4. Assessment/Evaluation Studies
5. One Group Pre-test – Post-test Design 5. Descriptive Comparative Study
Activity 3
1. b
2. d
3. a
4. e
5. c
Reference
Faltado III, R. E., Bombita. M. B., Boholano, H. B., and Pogoy, A. M. (2016). Practical Research 2:
Quantitative Research. Lorimar publishing, Inc