Republic of the Philippines

NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
ORIENTAL MINDORO PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICE
PINAMALAYAN MUNICIPAL POLICE STATION
Barangay Zone 3, Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro
e-Mail:[email protected]
Telephone Number: 284-3008

Cecill John Del Mundo Cruz, Administrative Case Number:

Complainant, ORMIN PPO 2020-002
-versus-
For: Simple Misconduct
Pursuant to Rule 21, Section 2A,
Paragraph 3(o) of NAPOLCOM
Memorandum Circular 2016-002

PSSg Michael J Alquisar

Respondent,

x---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
DECISION

This pertains to the Summary Proceedings against PSSg Michael J Alquisar

with docket number ORMIN PPO 2020-002 for Simple Misconduct pursuant to Rule 21,
Section 2A, Paragraph 3(o) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular 2016-002, which
states that “commit any act or omission that constitutes a crime punishable under the
Revised Penal Code or Special Laws where the duration of imposable penalty is
imprisonment of one (1) day to thirty (30) days”.

After perusal of available records, it shows that on September 27, 2019 about
9:00 O’clock in the evening, along National Highway, Sitio Minolo, Barangay San Isidro,
Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro the complainant and respondent had a Road Rage
which resulted to heated confrontation. Accordingly, the complainant was riding his
motorcycle going to Barangay San Isidro, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro to fetch his
wife and upon reaching Sitio Minolo of the said barangay he noticed the respondent
with a back ride on board a motorcycle at the middle of the road then reduced speed
and honked his horn as a signal that he was coming. Likewise, complainant said to the
respondent “ makakadisgrasya kayo eh, kung mag-iinom ay yong kaya”.

In the aforesaid facts, the complainant was the first one to approach and caution
the respondent about the manner of driving to avoid accident and presumed that the
latter was under the influence of intoxicating liquor during that time.
 Available pieces of evidence presented revealed that the respondent identified
himself as member of the PNP while having a heated confrontation against the
complainant. As to the allegation of the complainant that the respondent was drunk or
under the influence of liquor, the records finds no merit and that claim is purely
suspicion. Thus, the statement of the respondent that he is not drunk during the time of
incident supported with the Copy of Electrocardiography Report, Certification of PEMS
DOMINGO P CAMORAL, MESPO of Puerto Galera MPS and corroborated with the
Sworn Statement of witnesses James Mico Garcia y Ramos and Edwin Evangelista y
Sandoval are convincing.

Concerning the contention of the complainant that PSSg Alquisar drew a gun
from his waist and uttered “bakit, anong problema mo” then pointed it to the complainant
and asked the respondent PSSg Alquisar “bakit mo ako babarilin” but the companion of
the latter pacified him were doubtful. It is noteworthy that the complainant failed to
disclose even a mere description of a gun used by the respondent to threaten him as
well as his lone witness Gloria Pediego. Also, the complainant managed to ask the
respondent “bakit mo ako babarilin” while he is claiming that a gun is already pointed to
him. There is in serious doubt that the words of the complainant “bakit mo ako babarilin”
can be uttered by a victim who was threatened with a gun.

In relevance, complainant presented the Sworn Statement of his witness Gloria

Pediego and Blotter of Barangay to corroborate his claim but it cannot stand against the
straightforward sworn statements of James Mico Garcia and Edwin Evangelista that the
respondent did not carry any firearm during the incident.

Moreover, there is a Resolution from the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor

indicting the respondent for the crime of Other Light Threats defined and penalized
under Article 285 of the Revised Penal Code. Though, the finding of probable cause in
criminal case lies within the discretion of the public prosecutor after conducting a
preliminary investigation however it does not mean or premature to say that the
respondent is guilty of the crime charged. The two cases are independent from each
other. In the case Flores vs People of the Philippines (GR 222861, April 23, 2018), the
Supreme Court, through Associate Justice Alexander Gesmundo, stated that : “it is a
hornbook doctrine in administrative law that administrative cases are independent from
criminal actions for the same acts or omission. Thus, an absolution from a criminal
charge is not a bar to an administrative prosecution, or vice versa”

After perusal of the pieces of evidence submitted by both parties, there is no

substantial evidence to support the claim that respondent drew a gun from his waist,
pointed it to the complainant. On the other hand, it cannot be rebutted that there is a
substantial evidence that respondent had a heated confrontation with the complainant
due to Road Rage wherein during that time of anger he identified himself as a member
of the Philippine National Police. Thus, the civilian always expected that all the police
always carry a gun to protect themselves in maintaining peace in order. The respondent
must not use his authority on that occasion but instead apply or exercise maximum
tolerance. The actuation of the respondent created fear and it cannot be condoned by
the PNP organization.

In Article 285 “Other Light Threats” of the Revised Penal Code provides that (b)
any person who, in the heat of anger, shall orally threaten another with some harm not
constituting a crime, and who by subsequent acts show that he did not persist in the
idea involved in his threat, provided that the circumstances of the offense shall not bring
it within the provisions of Article 282 of this Code.

Claiming Mitigating Circumstances, the Personal Data Sheet (PDS) issued by the
Regional Personnel and Records Management Division, PRO MIMAROPA was
scrutinized and further revealed that respondent rendered eleven (11) years and five (5)
months in the service, receive various awards and commendation and this charge was
the first case filed against him.

After due considerations, antecedent facts, circumstances and pieces of evidence

presented by both parties, the undersigned concluded that there is substantial basis to
hold the respondent liable of the offense charged.

WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, this office finds the respondent,

PSSg Michael J Alquisar liable for Simple Misconduct and he is hereby meted the
penalty of REPRIMAND with STERN WARNING that a repetition of the same or similar
infractions will be dealt with more severely.

SO ORDERED.

Done this 18th day of June 2020, Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro.

CHRISTOPHER R DELA CRUZ

Police Colonel
Provincial Director
 Republic of the Philippines
NATIONAL POLICE COMMISSION
PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE
ORIENTAL MINDORO PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICE
PINAMALAYAN MUNICIPAL POLICE STATION
Barangay Zone 3, Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro
e-Mail:[email protected]
Telephone Number: 284-3008

Cecill John Del Mundo Cruz, Administrative Case Number:

Complainant, ORMIN PPO 2020-002
-versus-
For: Simple Misconduct
Pursuant to Rule 21, Section 2A,
Paragraph 3(o) of NAPOLCOM
Memorandum Circular 2016-002

PSSg Michael J Alquisar

Respondent,
x-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

REPORT OF INVESTIGATION

PREFATORY STATEMENT:

1. Brief statement of the case:

This pertains to the Administrative Case filed against PSSg Michael J Alquisar
with docket number ORMIN PPO 2020-002 for Simple Misconduct pursuant to Rule 21,
Section 2A, Paragraph 3(o) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular 2016-002, which
states that “commit any act or omission that constitutes a crime punishable under the
Revised Penal Code or Special Laws where the duration of imposable penalty is
imprisonment of one (1) day to thirty (30) days”.

2. Brief statement on procedural matters undertaken such as:

a. Summons were sent to the respondent and complainant for Pre-hearing

Conference;

b. The complainant, Cecill John Del Mundo Cruz together with his witness
Gloria Pediego, respondent PSSg Michal J Alquisar and representative from PIDMU
ORMIN PPO appeared for Pre-hearing Conference on June 4, 2020 at 9:30 in the
morning at Pinamalayan Municipal Police Station, Barangay Zone 3, Pinamalayan,
Oriental Mindoro. During the conduct of the Pre-Hearing Conference, on the side of the
complainant, the following documentary exhibits were marked:
 1. Charge Sheet consisting of two pages marked as Exhibit “A”, Second
Page “A-1” Date signed by the Complainant/Representative “A-2” and Signature of the
Complainant/Representative “A-3.

2. Pre Charge Investigation on Complaint against PSSg Michael Jumawan

Alquisar for Alleged Simple Misconduct (Art. 285 of RPC-Other Light Threats) consisting
of three pages marked as Exhibit “B”- First Page, “B-1” Date of Memorandum, “B-2”
Second Page, “B-3” Third page , Signature of Investigator On-Case “B-4”, Signature of
Chief, PIDMU “B-5”, “B-6” Signature of the Provincial Director and Date Approved by
the Provincial Director “B-7”.

3. Complaint Sheet against respondent PSSg Michael Jumawan Alquisar

marked as Exhibit “C”, “C-1” Signature of Complainant and “C-2” name and Signature
of Evaluator.

4. Certificate of Non-Forum Shopping marked as Exhibit “D”, Signature of

Affiant “D-1”, date of subscribed and sworn of Administering officer “ D-2”, signature of
Administering Officer “D-3” and date of signature of Administering Officer “D-4”.

5. Initial Evaluation Report Re: Complaint against PSSg Michael Alquisar for
alleged Simple Misconduct (Art. 285 of RPC-Other Light Threats) consisting of three
pages marked as Exhibit “E”- First Page, “E-1” Date of Memorandum, “E-2” Second
Page, “E-3” Third page , Signature of Pre-Charge Investigator “E-4”, Signature of OIC,
RIDMD “E-5” and “E-6” Signature of the Regional Director”.

6. Notice of Complaint of PSSg Michael Jumawan Alquisar marked as Exhibit

“F”, “F-1”- Date of Notice of Complaint and “F-2” Signature of OIC,RIDMD.

7. Initial Evaluation Report Re: Complaint against PSSg Michael Alquisar for
Alleged Misconduct (Art 285 of RPC “Other Light Threats) consisting of two pages
marked as Exhibit “G’ ,Date of Memorandum “G-1”, Second Page “G-2”, signature of
Evaluator on Case “G-3”, and signature of Acting Provincial Superintendent, ORMDO
PIAS “G-4”.

8. Sworn Statement of the complainant Cecill John Cruz consisting of two (2)
pages marked as Exhibit “H”-First Page, “H-1”- Second Page, Signature of Cecill John
Cruz- ”H-2”, Date signed by the Administering Officer “H-3” and Deputy Provincial
Prosecutor HUMILITO A DOLOR “H-4”.

9. Sworn Statement of Gloria Pediego consisting of two (2) pages marked as

Exhibit “I”,First Page, “I-1”- Second Page, Signature of Gloria Pediego-”I-2”, Date signed
by the Administering Officer “I-3” and Deputy Provincial Prosecutor HUMILITO A
DOLOR “I-4”.

10. Photocopy of Barangay Blotter of San Isidro consisting of two (2) pages
marked as Exhibit “J”-First Page, “J-1”- Second Page.
 11. Subpoena versus PSSg MICHEL J. ALQUISAR for Other Light Threats
docketed under Criminal Case No. CR-19-4352 marked as Exhibit “K, Signature of
Clerk of Court II “K-1”.

The respondent also submitted and marked the following documentary exhibits
for considerations:

1. Counter Affidavit of PSSg Michel Alquisar y Jumawan consisting of two pages

marked as Exhibit “1”-First Page, “1-A”- Second Page, Signature of PSSg Michel
Alquisar y Jumawan -“1-B”, Date signed by the Administering Officer “1-C” and
Signature of Administering Officer, Prosecutor II JOSE JAY E DELA CHICA “1D”.

2. Sworn Statement of James Mico Garcia y Ramos consisting of two pages

marked as Exhibit “2”-First Page, “2-A”- Second Page, “ Signature of James Mico
Garcia y Ramos “2-B”, Date signed by the Administering Officer “2-C” and Signature of
Administering Officer, Prosecutor II JOSE JAY E DELA CHICA ”2-D”.

3. Sworn Statement of Edwin Evangelista y Sandoval, marked as Exhibit “3”-,

“3-A” Signature of Edwin Sandoval , “3-B”-Date signed by the Administering Officer
and Signature of Administering Officer, Prosecutor II JOSE JAY E DELA CHICA ”3-C”.

4. Resolution of the National Prosecution Service, Calapan City, Oriental Mindoro

consisting of two (2) pages marked as Exhibit “4”- First Page, Second Page “4-A,
signed by the Associate Provincial Prosecutor MART NOEL M. RILLORTA “4-B” and
Signature of the Deputy Provincial Prosecutor HUMILITO A DOLOR “4-C”.

5. Photocopy of Clinical Radiography Department Cardiovascular Section of

Alquisar, Michael consisting of two (2) pages marked as Exhibit “5” and photo copy of
Electrocardiography (ECG) Report “5-A”.

6. Certification from Barangay Palangan, Puerto Galera marked as Exhibit “6”,

Date signed by Hon. Zosimo C. Maniebo “6-A” and Signature of Hon. Zosimo C.
Maniebo “6-B”.

7. Answer of PSSg Michael Alquisar for Simple Misconduct pursuant to Rule 21,
section 2A, Paragraph 3, (o) of NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular No. 2016-002
consisting of three (3) pages marked as Exhibit “7” – First page, Second page “7-A”
Third Page “7-B”, date signed by respondent “7-C”, signature of PSSg J Alquisar
respondent “7-D” , date signed by subscribed officer “7-E” and signature of
Subscribed officer JIM C PANTALEON “7-F” .

8. PNP Personal Data Sheet of PSSg Michael Junawin Alquisar consisting of

six (6) pages marked as Exhibit “8” – First page, Second page- “8-A”, Third Page- “8-
B”, fourth page -“8-C”, fifth page- “8-D” , sixth page- “8-E “ , thumb mark of PSSg
Michael J Alquisar- “8-F” and signature of PSSg Michael J Alquisar- “8-G”.
 9. Certification from Municipal Executive Senior Police Officer PEMS Domingo P
Camoral of Puerto Galera Municipal Police Station marked as Exhibit “9”, Date signed
by PEMS Domingo P Camoral , MESPO of Puerto Galera MPS- “9-A” and Signature of
PEMS Domingo P Camoral -9-B”.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

A. VERSION OF THE COMPLAINANT:

On September 27, 2019 at about 9:00 PM, he was riding his motorcycle going to
Barangay San Isidro, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro to fetch his wife. Upon reaching
Sitio Minolo of the said barangay, he noticed the two (2) persons on board a motorcycle
at the middle of the road . He reduced speed and honked his horn as a signal that he
was coming but when he was about to overtake, the motorcycle suddenly moved which
prompted him to stop in order to avoid collision. The complainant then said
“makakadisgrasya kayo eh, kong mag-iinum ay yong kaya”, but the driver, PSSg
Michael J Alquisar drew a firearm from his waist, pointed it to the complainant and
uttered “bakit” anong problema mo”. He asked PSSg Alquisar, “bakit mo ako babarilin”,
then the companion of the said policeman pacified him. The complainant also noticed
that PSSg Alquisar appeared to be under the influenced of intoxicating liquor. Further,
he averred that he filed a criminal complaint against PSSg Alquisar for Attempted
Homicide at Provincial Prosecutor’s Office docketed under I.S. Number NPS-IV-07A-
INV-19J-00185.

Further, complainant supported his allegation with the Sworn Statement of his
lone witness Gloria Pediego, Copy of Barangay Blotter, Resolution of the Prsosecutor
indicting the respondent for the crime of Other Light Threats (Article 285 of RPC). Also,
he claim that probable cause was established by the Chief, PIDMU, thus, warranting
the conduct of summary procedure against the respondent for “Simple Misconduct”.

Notably, complainant admits that there is no substantial evidence to show that

any of those additional elements exist to qualify respondent’s misconduct as a grave.
After which, discussed that while it is true that the respondent was wearing civilian
clothes, the mere fact that he drew his firearm from his waist and pointed the same to
the complainant should not be treated lightly as it may have serious repercussions
considering that it may involve the infliction of bodily harm or death. The act of the
respondent tarnishes the image and integrity of the Philippine National Police and
should not be countenanced.

In addition, complainant claim that the respondent admitted that he indeed was
riding a motorcycle and running in the area of Sitio Minolo, Barangay San Isidro,Puerto
Galera, Oriental Mindoro when he reduced speed causing him to be in a slumping
position.

More, complainant insisted that he would not put into writing and have his
complaint blotter at theBarangay Office and eventually, filed before the office of the
Provincial Prosecutor and the Oriental Mindoro Provincial Police Office if it was not true.
Complainant, as well as his witness, is not actuated by any ill motives to fabricate a
complaint against the respondent. Except for this case, the complainant has not filed
any complaint against anyone and he has no derogatory record in the court of law even
in the barangay.

Again, complainant added on his version that the respondent would have been
ready to present his witnesses even during Pre-hearing Conference for corroboration of
his defense, however, he fails to do so. Thus, his defense should be considered as a
pure denial.

B. VERSION OF THE RESPONDENT:

On September 27, 2019 at around 9:00 O’clock in the evening, while the
respondent was driving his motorcycle with James Mico Gofarcia y Ramos,28 years
old, married, and a resident of Barangay San Isidro, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro, as
back ride, along the National Highway located at Sitio Minolo, Barangay San Isidro,
Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro, going home, respondent give a signal in turning right
direction in order to avoid an accident because there was a speeding motorcycle in the
opposite direction but the respondent instead of turning right he slowly go straight away
and giving signal that he is turning left in order for them to return to the road in going
home but they met the complainant Cecill John Cruz riding his motorcycle who uttered
at top of the voice “PUTANG INA N’YO SAGASAAN KO KAYO MGA HAYOP KAYO,
NAGMAMADALI AKO”. Respondent introduced himself as member of the Philippine
National Police but again the complainant uttered at the top of his voice with the words
“ANONG KLASI KANG PULIS, GAGO KA PALA EH, PULIS KA LANG” then Cecill
John Cruz go away.

Respondent witnesses Edwin S Evangelista who was his back ride during the
incident and Edwin S Evangelista corroborated his claims. Likewise, respondent
insisted that the complainant tend to harass him because of the desire to see him
experience pain, injury, or distress after he had been reprimanded in check points for
over speeding and disregarding traffic signs and that Puerto Galera MPS had filed
against the relative of Cecill John Cruz.

Respondent claims that he is not drunk during the incident because he never
take any liquor, wine or beverages as strictly prohibited by his doctor due to his heart
disease, the fact known to other PNP personnel in his present and previous
assignments. Further, he submitted a copy of Electrocardiography Report and
Certification of PEMS DOMINGO P CAMORAL, MESPO of Puerto Galera MPS.

The respondent averred that he came from Lanao del Norte and he spoke “sawit”
tagalog and some persons suspected him to be drunk. Then, he vehemently deny to
carry any firearm while not in uniform or in civilian attire for this is strictly prohibited.

Clearly, respondent attached his Personal Data Sheet (PDS) issued by the
Regional Personnel and Records Management Division, PRO MIMAROPA to prove that
he was eleven (11) years and five (5) months in the service, receive various awards and
commendation and this charge was the first case filed against him.

In relevance, respondent argued that Rule 21, Section 2A, paragraph 3(0) of
NAPOLCOM MC 2016-002 provides that respondent commit any act or omission
implies that the court having jurisdiction to tried respondent never arraigned the herein
respondent guilty of any crime or offense. Also, the court who has an exclusive
jurisdiction to tried respondent never arraigned him nor declared guilty of any crime or
offense.

ISSUE TO BE RESOLVED:

The issue to be resolved is whether PSSg Michael J. Alquisar is administratively

liable or not for Simple Misconduct pursuant to Rule 21, Section 2A, Paragraph 3(o) of
NAPOLCOM Memorandum Circular 2016-002, which states that “commit any act or
omission that constitutes a crime punishable under the Revised Penal Code or Special
Laws where the duration of imposable penalty is imprisonment of one (1) day to thirty
(30) days”.

EVALUATION OF THE CASE:

After perusal of available records, it shows that on September 27, 2019 about
9:00 O’clock in the evening, along National Highway, Sitio Minolo, Barangay San Isidro,
Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro the complainant and respondent had a Road Rage
which resulted to heated confrontation. Accordingly, the complainant was riding his
motorcycle going to Barangay San Isidro, Puerto Galera, Oriental Mindoro to fetch his
wife and upon reaching Sitio Minolo of the said barangay he noticed the respondent
with a back ride on board a motorcycle at the middle of the road then reduced speed
and honked his horn as a signal that he was coming. Likewise, complainant said to the
respondent “ makakadisgrasya kayo eh, kung mag-iinom ay yong kaya”.

In the aforesaid facts, the complainant was the first one to approach and caution
the respondent about the manner of driving to avoid accident and presumed that the
latter was under the influence of intoxicating liquor during that time.
 Available pieces of evidence presented revealed that the respondent identified
himself as member of the PNP while having a heated confrontation against the
complainant. As to the allegation of the complainant that the respondent was drunk or
under the influence of liquor, the records finds no merit and that claim is purely
suspicion. Thus, the statement of the respondent that he is not drunk during the time of
incident supported with the Copy of Electrocardiography Report, Certification of PEMS
DOMINGO P CAMORAL, MESPO of Puerto Galera MPS and corroborated with the
Sworn Statement of witnesses James Mico Garcia y Ramos and Edwin Evangelista y
Sandoval are convincing.

Concerning the contention of the complainant that PSSg Alquisar drew a gun
from his waist and uttered “bakit, anong problema mo” then pointed it to the complainant
and asked the respondent PSSg Alquisar “bakit mo ako babarilin” but the companion of
the latter pacified him were doubtful. It is noteworthy that the complainant failed to
disclose even a mere description of a gun used by the respondent to threaten him as
well as his lone witness Gloria Pediego. Also, the complainant managed to ask the
respondent “bakit mo ako babarilin” while he is claiming that a gun is already pointed to
him. There is in serious doubt that the words of the complainant “bakit mo ako babarilin”
can be uttered by a victim who was threatened with a gun.

In relevance, complainant presented the Sworn Statement of his witness Gloria

Pediego and Blotter of Barangay to corroborate his claim but it cannot stand against the
straightforward sworn statements of James Mico Garcia and Edwin Evangelista that the
respondent did not carry any firearm during the incident.

Moreover, there is a Resolution from the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor

indicting the respondent for the crime of Other Light Threats defined and penalized
under Article 285 of the Revised Penal Code. Though, the finding of probable cause in
criminal case lies within the discretion of the public prosecutor after conducting a
preliminary investigation however it does not mean or premature to say that the
respondent is guilty of the crime charged. The two cases are independent from each
other. In the case Flores vs People of the Philippines (GR 222861, April 23, 2018), the
Supreme Court, through Associate Justice Alexander Gesmundo, stated that : “it is a
hornbook doctrine in administrative law that administrative cases are independent from
criminal actions for the same acts or omission. Thus, an absolution from a criminal
charge is not a bar to an administrative prosecution, or vice versa” .

After perusal of the pieces of evidence submitted by both parties, there is no

substantial evidence to support the claim that respondent drew a firearm from his
waist, pointed it to the complainant. On the other hand, it cannot be rebutted that there
is a substantial evidence that respondent had a heated confrontation with the
complainant due to Road Rage wherein during that time of anger he identified himself
as a member of the Philippine National Police. Thus, the civilian always expected that
all the police always carry a gun to protect themeselves in maintaining peace in order.
The respondent must not use his authority on that occasion but instead apply or
exercise maximum tolerance. The actuation of the respondent created fear and it
cannot be condoned by the PNP organization.

In Article 285 “Other Light Threats” of the Revised Penal Code provides that (b)
any person who, in the heat of anger, shall orally threaten another with some harm not
constituting a crime, and who by subsequent acts show that he did not persist in the
idea involved in his threat, provided that the circumstances of the offense shall not bring
it within the provisions of Article 282 of this Code.

Claiming Mitigating Circumstances, the respondent attached his Personal Data

Sheet (PDS) issued by the Regional Personnel and Records Management Division,
PRO MIMAROPA to prove that he was eleven (11) years and five (5) months in the
service, receive various awards and commendation and this charge was the first case
filed against him. More, NAPOLCOM MEMORANDUM CIRCULAAR 2016-002, Rule 22,
Section 4 provides Mitigating Circumstances, hence, Section 2 (a) under the Range of
Penalties for Light Offense is REPRIMAND for the first offense.

FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS:

After due consideration of antecedent facts and pieces of evidence presented by

both parties, the undersigned concludes that there is substantial basis to hold the
respondent liable for the offense charged.

RECOMMENDATION:

WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, the undersigned Summary

Hearing Officer recommends that the respondent, PSSg Michael J Alquisar be held
administratively liable for Simple Misconduct.

Done this 18th day of June 2020, Pinamalayan, Oriental Mindoro.

LEO P DACAYANAN
Police Lieutenant
Summary Hearing Officer