DCPM and Other Common Online Advertising Performance Models: What Is CPM?
DCPM and Other Common Online Advertising Performance Models: What Is CPM?
DCPM and Other Common Online Advertising Performance Models: What Is CPM?
Advantages
- The advertiser knows exactly how many times the banner will be shown, and
what would be his daily / total costs.
- Common model when buying media against a specific URL / site / ad spot.
- CPM is being prioritized first by ad-networks since the publisher knows
exactly what the expected revenue per impression is.
Disadvantages
- Very weak performance matrix, very weak correlation with sales or leads.
- No indications for the advertiser on banner, campaign or media quality.
- When dealing with multiple sites or ad spots advertiser might receive cheap
media instead of effective media.
- Effective frequency capping is unknown.
Advantages
- The advertiser knows exactly how many times his landing page / site will be
clicked, and what would be his daily / total costs.
- The banner will be shown until enough clicks are being generated
- Common model when looking for exposure with no direct lead or sale goals
- CPC is optimized quiet fast by optimizing ad-networks to generate high CTR
- Reasonable indicator for banner quality
Disadvantages
- Weak correlation with Sales or Leads
- Dependable on click tracking technology and measurement
- Weak performance matrix, vulnerable to click frauds
- No indication for campaign quality (only banner quality)
- Advertiser might receive cheap media instead of effective media
- Effective frequency capping is unknown
Advantages
- The advertiser pays according to results only.
- The banner will be shown for unlimited period of time.
- Preferred model for the advertiser. Zero risk on his side.
- Low vulnerability to frauds.
- High correlation between sales and campaign and banner quality.
Disadvantages
- Publisher will not allocate premium media for questionable profit
- Publisher will refuse to work in this model when cpm / cpc models can fill
his inventory
- Dependable on conversion tracking technology and measurement.
- Hard for the publisher to estimate when to stop a campaign
Note: There are many other Cost Per Action models, like Cost per Call (for cellular
advertising), Cost per Download (for downloadable products), Cost per View (a
common term for video based advertising). Advertisers who claim to support all
available model sometimes use the term CPE – cost per everything.
Although the cost per Lead was as desired by the advertiser, the publisher might drop
the campaign receiving only $0.3 eCPM on day 3.
Here, the publisher might be satisfied with his 0.5$ CPM but the advertiser loses on
day 1 and day 3 paying more than 5$ per lead dropping the campaign as well.
Although the publisher in this example receives satisfactory eCPMs, the advertiser is
not profitable at $8 per lead.
Solution:
Dynamic CPM with a CPA target
Analysis: On day 1 the optimization process sees that the advertiser is profitable and
even has a margin as he pays $4 for a $5 worth leads. This usually means that by
driving more traffic, more leads can be obtained. On day 2, more leads have been
obtained, advertising still paying under his target lead price. On day 3, even more
traffic is being bought breaking the CPA limit of the advertiser. The optimization
process decides to reduce traffic for the campaign.
Analysis: The campaign maintains a good balance between the eCPA for the
advertiser and the CPM for the publisher until day 40 where even at the price of $0.3
CPM the campaign is not effective anymore at an eCPA of $9. Publisher cannot
decrease the price since other advertisers bid more and advertiser is not profitable.
The campaign is dropped.
Disadvantages
- Advertiser has to risk an initial sum before seeing results.
- Dependable on conversion tracking technology.
Marketing Experts
at Your Service
Site: http://www.tlvmedia.com | Email: [email protected]