Airworthiness Directive Bombardier/Canadair 090928

Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library\rgADNP...
RGL Home
AD Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Federal Register Information

Federal Register: September 28, 2009
[Page 49346-49349]
Header Information
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0792; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-057-AD]

RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series
700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model
CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes
Preamble Information
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the

products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the

CL-600-2C10/CL600-2D15/CL-600-2D24 aircraft fuel system against the new fuel
tank safety standards, introduced in Chapter 525 of the Airworthiness Manual
through Notice of Proposed Amendment (NPA) 2002-043. The identified
non-compliances were assessed using Transport Canada Policy Letter No.
525-001 to determine if mandatory corrective action was required.
The assessment showed that certain hydraulic system failure scenarios could
lead to a rapid overheat in the hydraulic lines without giving flight crew sufficient
1 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
time to react before the No. 1 and No. 2 hydraulic system tubing inside the fuel
tank reaches the fuel auto ignition temperature. This could result in a fuel tank
explosion.
*****
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 12, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail
[email protected]; Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or

in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Alfano, Aerospace

Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590;
telephone (516) 228-7340; fax (516) 794-5531.
2 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this
proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include "Docket No. FAA-2009-0792; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
057-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on
the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this
proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and
may amend this proposed AD based on those comments.
We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that address
MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to provide adequate
time for interested parties to submit comments. The comment period for these
proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which is consistent with the comment
period for domestic transport ADs.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this
proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-09, dated March 9, 2009
(referred to after this as "the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

explosion.
To correct the unsafe condition, this [Canadian airworthiness] directive mandates
the installation of thermal fuses in the No. 1 and No. 2 hydraulic systems and the
introduction of Fuel System Limitations (FSL) and Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL) associated with this design change.
3 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank
explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing
regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and
existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings,
we issued a regulation titled "Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design
Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for
transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special
Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 ("SFAR 88,'' Amendment 21-78, and
subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., type certificate
(TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate that their
fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement
applies to type design holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and
for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform
design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if
their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the
preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives to mandate
any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions identified as a result
of these reviews.
In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four criteria intended to
define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel tank systems that require
corrective actions. The percentage of operating time during which fuel tanks are
exposed to flammable conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria
address the failure types under evaluation: single failures, single failures in
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure experience. For all
four criteria, the evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that
may mitigate the need for further action.
Relevant Service Information
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 670BA-29-005, Revision A, dated

January 29, 2009; Bombardier Temporary Revision 2-268, dated December 18,
2008, to Section 3, "Fuel System Limitations,'' of Part 2 of the Bombardier
CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, and CL-600-2D24 Maintenance Requirements
Manual; and Bombardier Temporary Revision 2-269, dated December 18, 2008,
to Section 3, "Fuel System Limitations,'' of Part 2 of the Bombardier
Manual. The actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and
is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement
4 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined
an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the
same type design.
Differences between this AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general,
agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different
words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is
enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively
from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI
in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE
within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect
about 334 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 45
work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $6,765 per product. Where the service information lists required parts costs
that are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $3,461,910, or
$10,365 per product.
Authority for this Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on
aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the
scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in "Subtitle VII, Part
A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section,
Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air
commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the
Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely
to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
5 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications

under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government
and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this
proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Regulatory Information
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Bombardier Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2009-0792; Directorate

Identifier 2009-NM-057-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by November 12, 2009.
Affected ADs
6 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,
701, & 702), airplanes; certificated in any category, having serial numbers 10003
through 10267 inclusive; and Bombardier Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705) and CL-600- 2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900), certificated in any
category, having serial numbers 15001 through 15199 inclusive, 15202, and
15204.
Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to

include new inspections. Compliance with these inspections is required by 14
CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or
repaired in the areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be
able to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to
comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (g) of this AD. The
request should include a description of changes to the required inspections that
will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29: Hydraulic power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

explosion.
To correct the unsafe condition, this [Canadian airworthiness] directive mandates

the installation of thermal fuses in the No. 1 and No. 2 hydraulic systems and the
introduction of Fuel System Limitations (FSL) and Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCL) associated with this design change.
7 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.

(1) Within 6,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, modify the aircraft
hydraulic system by installing thermal fuses according to the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-005, Revision A, dated
January 29, 2009.
(2) Before or concurrently with the actions required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD,
revise the Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the tasks identified in Table 1 of this AD
as specified in Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) 2-269, dated December 18,
2008, to Section 3, "Fuel Systems Limitations,'' of Part 2 of the Bombardier
Manual. The initial compliance time for the task is within 10,000 flight hours after
doing the action required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, or within 60 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and the limitation task must be
accomplished thereafter at the "limiting interval'' specified in Bombardier TR
2-269, dated December 18, 2008, except as provided by paragraphs (f)(4) and
(g)(1) of this AD.
Table 1--Fuel System Limitation Task
Task No. Task description

29-30-00-603 Hydraulic System No. 1 and No. 2
Thermal Fuse: Discard the system No.
1 and No. 2 thermal fuse (Post
Modsum 670T112042 or SB 670BA-
29-005).
(3) Before or concurrently with the actions required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD,
revise the ALS of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to incorporate the
CDCCL data specified in Bombardier TR 2-268, dated December 18, 2008, to
Section 3, "Fuel System Limitations,'' of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2C10,
CL- 600-2D15 and CL-600-2D24 Maintenance Requirements Manual.
Note 2: The actions required by paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD may be
done by inserting a copy of the TR into the maintenance requirements manual.
When the TR has been included in the general revision of the maintenance
program, the general revision may be inserted into the maintenance requirements
manual, provided the relevant information in the general revision is identical to
that in the TR, and the temporary revision may be removed.
(4) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraphs (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this
8 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
AD, no alternative limitation tasks, limitation task intervals, or CDCCLs may be

used unless the limitation task, limitation task interval, or CDCCL is approved as
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
(5) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-005, dated December 18, 2008, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.
Note 3: Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements,

components that have been identified as airworthy or installed on the affected
airplanes before the revision of the airworthiness limitations section, as required
by paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, do not need to be reworked in
accordance with the CDCCLs. However, once the airworthiness limitations
section has been revised, future maintenance actions on these components must
be done in accordance with the CDCCLs.
FAA AD Differences
Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Christopher Alfano, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch,
ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7340; fax (516) 794-5531.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector
(PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards
District Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the
State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure
the product is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120- 0056.
Related Information
9 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM
(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-09, dated March 9,

2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-29-005, Revision A, dated January 29,
2009; Bombardier TR 2-268, dated December 18, 2008, to Section 3, "Fuel
System Limitations,'' of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15,
and CL-600-2D24 Maintenance Requirements Manual; and Bombardier TR
2-269, dated December 18, 2008, to Section 3, "Fuel System Limitations,'' of Part
2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2C10, CL-600-2D15, and CL-600-2D24 Maintenance
Requirements Manual; for related information.
Footer Information
Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 18, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-23296 Filed 9-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Comments
Not Applicable
FAA.gov Home | Privacy Policy | Web Policies & Notices | Contact Us | Help
Readers & Viewers: PDF Reader | MS Word Viewer | MS PowerPoint Viewer | MS Excel Viewer | WinZip
10 of 10 1/24/11 12:26 PM

Airworthiness Directive Bombardier/Canadair 090928

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Airworthiness Directive Bombardier/Canadair 090928

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Airworthiness Directive Bombardier/Canadair 090928

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bombardier Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library\rgADNP...

AD Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Federal Register Information

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0792; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-057-AD]

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the

Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Alfano, Aerospace

Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the

Relevant Service Information

Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 670BA-29-005, Revision A, dated

FAA's Determination and Requirements of this Proposed AD

Differences between this AD and the MCAI or Service Information

Authority for this Rulemaking

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

Bombardier Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2009-0792; Directorate

Comments Due Date

(a) We must receive comments by November 12, 2009.

Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states:

Bombardier Aerospace has completed a system safety review of the

To correct the unsafe condition, this [Canadian airworthiness] directive mandates

Actions and Compliance

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.

Table 1--Fuel System Limitation Task

Task No. Task description

AD, no alternative limitation tasks, limitation task intervals, or CDCCLs may be

Note 3: Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements,

Other FAA AD Provisions

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-09, dated March 9,

You might also like