EXW - Ex Works (Named Place of Delivery) Incoterms® 2020 (UPDATED)
EXW - Ex Works (Named Place of Delivery) Incoterms® 2020 (UPDATED)
A1 (General Obligations)
In each of the eleven rules the seller must provide the goods and their commercial invoice as
required by the contract of sale and any other evidence of conformity such as an analysis certificate
or weighbridge document etc that might be relevant and specified in the contract.
Each of the rules also provides that any document can be in paper or electronic form as agreed to in
the contract, or if the contract makes no mention of this then as is customary. The rules do not define
what “electronic form” is, it can be anything from a pdf file to blockchain or some format yet to be
developed in the future.
B1 (General Obligations)
In each of the rules the buyer must pay the price for the goods as stated in the contract of sale.
The rules do not refer to when the payment is to be made (before shipment, immediately after
shipment, thirty days after shipment, half now half later, or whatever) or how it is to be paid
(prepayment, against an email of copy documents, on presentation of documents to a bank under a
letter of credit, or other arrangement). These matters should be specified in the contract.
A2 (Delivery)
The seller delivers simply when the goods are placed at the disposal of the buyer at an agreed point,
which is usually the seller’s own premises or somewhere like their contracted manufacturer, on the
specifically agreed date or within the agreed period such as “by 31 March” or “within 90 days after
contract date.” This means that even though the goods are simply sitting within the seller’s premises
they have already been “delivered,” the act of delivery here is not a physical handing over by a
movement of the goods but a notional one achieved by the seller giving the appropriate notice to
the buyer.
When the buyer arranges a collecting vehicle, whether a carrier’s vehicle or, new for the 2020 rules,
the buyer’s own vehicle, to be at the named premises the seller has no obligation to load that vehicle.
According to this rule the buyer must load the vehicle but in most cases this is simply not practical
for a number of reasons. The seller most likely, for insurance and safety reasons, will not allow
non-employees into their warehouse or factory. The seller certainly would not allow a buyer to go
rampaging around the premises in a forklift that the buyer rolled off their vehicle, and to physically
move the goods off say a rack three metres up might need a specialised forklift. The seller might
even use an automated picking and despatch system. Usually the seller would be best placed to
load the buyer’s vehicle, but if this is the expectation then the contract should clearly state that they
do so at the buyer’s cost and risk. If the buyer is not prepared to take this risk then EXW is not the
appropriate rule to be used and the parties should consider the FCA rule instead where it is the
seller’s obligation and risk to load the collecting vehicle.
If the goods are going to be at a location other than the seller’s premises, such as a contracted
manufacturer, or if the seller has several places within their premises such as numerous despatch
docks, this information needs to be communicated to the buyer so their vehicle goes to the correct
location. Any restrictions at the site need to be communicated too. If for example the loading dock
needs to be accessed through a carpark it might be that a forty-foot container on a trailer can not be
brought close to that dock. Or there might be restrictions on truck size in a narrow roadway.
B2 (Delivery)
The buyer’s role in EXW is that they must take delivery when the seller has made the goods available
and has given their notice of this under A10. This usually will be when the goods are simply sitting
in the seller’s premises and may well be before the buyer’s collecting vehicle arrives at the seller’s
premises. The buyer should consider their exposure to risk from this point on and would be wise to
ensure that they have adequate insurance cover such as under Institute Cargo Clauses (A).
The delivery requirements of the EXW rule can be difficult to work with.
A3 (All Rules)
In all the rules the seller bears all risks of loss or damage to the goods until they have been delivered
in accordance with A2 described above. The exception is loss or damage in circumstances described
in B3 below, which varies dependent on the buyer’s role in B2.
B3 (All Rules)
The buyer bears all risks of loss or damage to the goods once the seller has delivered them as
described in A2.
Additionally, if the buyer fails to give notice as described in B10 below and if the goods have been
clearly identified as the goods described in the contract then the buyer bears all risks of loss or
damage from the agreed date or the end of the agreed period for delivery.
A4 (Carriage)
In this rule the seller has no obligation to the buyer for arranging carriage of the goods.
The seller however does have an obligation to provide the buyer with any information in its
possession, including any transport-related security requirements, and requested by the buyer at its
risk and request.
B4 (Carriage)
The buyer must arrange for the carriage of the goods, whether by the buyer itself or a contracted
carrier, at its own cost from the named place of delivery. This allows for the buyer itself to take delivery
of the goods such as might occur in a domestic transaction.
Note that as the seller in EXW is not responsible for loading the goods onto the vehicle the buyer
will bear the cost of loading which would typically need to be added into its contract with the carrier.
There is no point in the carrier’s truck turning up at the seller’s premises with no loading equipment
and the seller refusing to load.
A5 (Insurance)
The seller does not have the risk beyond the delivery point so it has no obligation to the buyer to
arrange a contract of insurance. However, if the buyer requests, at its risk and cost, the seller must
provide the buyer with information in its possession that the buyer needs to arrange its insurance. If
there is any information which the buyer requests that is not already known to the seller, logically the
seller can, and probably would, choose to assist.
Nevertheless, and this is not covered by the Incoterms® 2020 rules, a wise seller would investigate
taking out marine insurance on a contingency basis. If the goods are lost or damaged in transit, and
the buyer therefore refuses to pay for them, in essence breaching the contract, the seller will want to
have a fall-back of being able to claim on its own marine insurance.
B5 (Insurance)
Despite having the risk of loss or damage to the goods from the delivery point, the buyer does not
have an obligation to the seller to insure the goods. Whether the buyer chooses to insure the goods
or bear the risk themselves is entirely their choice.
In domestic transactions the seller has no obligations as there are not likely to be any clearances
required.
In international transactions it is up to the buyer to carry out at its own cost all export/transit/import
formalities required by the countries concerned, such as any permits or licences; any security
clearances; pre-shipment inspection; and any other authorisations or formalities. Note the expression
“it is up to” the buyer because all of these occur after EXW delivery so if the buyer fails to do any of
these it is at its own risk as delivery has already occurred.
The seller must also package the goods, at its own cost, unless it is usual for the trade of the goods
that they are sold unpackaged, such as in the case of bulk goods. The seller must also take into
account the transport of the goods and package them appropriately, unless the parties have agreed
in their contract that the goods be packaged and/or marked in a specific manner.
EXW A9
A6 / B9:
B6: ALLOCATION
DELIVERY / TRANSPORT
OF COSTS / DOCUMENT
A9 (Allocation Of Costs)
The seller must pay all costs until the goods have been delivered under A2, except any costs the
buyer must pay as stated in B9.
B9 (Allocation Of Costs)
The buyer must pay all costs from the time the goods have been delivered under A2, reimburse the
seller for any costs they incurred providing the buyer with any assistance or information which the
buyer needed to arrange transport, insurance or export and import formalities.
The buyer must pay any and all duties, taxes, other charges and costs of any customs and other
export formalities required if the goods are exported.
The buyer also must pay any additional costs incurred either if they have failed to take delivery
of the goods when they have been placed at their disposal or if they have failed to give the seller
appropriate notice provided the seller had clearly identified the goods as being the contract goods.
A10 (Notices)
The seller must give notice to the buyer which is needed for the buyer to take delivery of the goods.
The form of this notice should be included in the terms and conditions of the contract, detailing
whether a brief email or some manner of more formal notice is agreed.
B10 (Notices)
If the parties agree that the buyer is entitled to nominate a place of taking delivery within the named
place, and/or the time within any agreed period, the buyer must give the seller sufficient notice. This
means for example that if the agreed delivery place is a large bulk storage facility, the buyer may
nominate a particular area which is outside a restricted zone, in which it is not allowed to operate
its own equipment with its own personnel, so that it can load its vehicle. It also means for example
where the delivery period is a particular calendar month, and the buyer wants to take delivery on the
17th day of that month, the buyer must give sufficient notice of this to the seller. Both such matters
would usually be detailed in the sales contract.
All advantage would seem to be to the seller, it does nothing more than shout (or email) “come and
get ‘em” or words to that effect. However if the sales contract is not well-drafted, while the seller
might be expecting that the buyer is going to export the goods to an overseas market it could find
that the buyer is in fact unable to complete export formalities and tries to reduce its potential losses
by selling the goods into the seller’s home market at a discounted price.
It would seem at first glance that the buyer is disadvantaged by having to take all risks and arrange
and pay for everything. Assuming that it is in a good position to do so then it would likely find that it
can arrange all transport and formalities at the same costs as might be offered the seller were it of a
mind to do so, but without paying the seller any mark-up on these costs. Another possibility is that the
buyer is buying goods not only from one seller but a number of sellers and chooses to accumulate
them at another location then consolidate them into one larger more cost-effective shipment in one
or more shipping containers.
On the other hand, the buyer must be in a position, for an overseas sale, to carry out export formalities
in the seller’s country. Most countries require the exporter to be a legally registered entity in that
Another aspect of EXW that makes life difficult is that the seller has no obligation to load the buyer’s
means of transport. It is the buyer who must arrange this, and that introduces all manner of potential
problems. If the seller makes its goods available in its covered warehouse, it quite probably will be
subject to various occupational health and safety regulations plus a variety of insurance implications.
It therefore cannot allow the buyer or its carrier to turn up with its truck, a forklift and its own staff to
go rampaging through the seller’s warehouse. Even if the seller at the last minute places the goods
outside the doors of its warehouse while ever the buyer attempts to load on the seller’s grounds
there are likely to be similar problems.
If the buyer requires extra documents such as a certificate of origin, the seller must assist the buyer,
at the buyer’s request, risk and cost, to obtain it. There could be complications if the issuing authority
in the seller’s country will only show a registered company in that country as the exporter/shipper/
consignor because the seller is none of them.
EXW is therefore best kept for domestic trades where questions of export formalities, how to claim
refund of taxes and so on simply don’t come into the equation, and where in those rare occasions the
buyer is able to load the goods without all the local rules and regulations preventing it from doing so.
Now for letters of credit (LCs). This rule is extremely difficult to arrange payment by an LC. The banks
typically want to see a negotiable bill of lading for sea, an air waybill for air, a copy of a rail or road
transport document as appropriate. We have seen that the seller is not in any way responsible for
transport and is not entitled to receive any document of transport. To make a workable LC as far as
the seller is concerned it would need to call only for an invoice, possibly a packing list, and a copy
of the buyer’s receipt (not the original, that should rightly be kept by the seller). The seller has no
obligation to obtain a certificate of origin, that should be arranged by the buyer as exporter or their
carrier. The risk to the seller is that the buyer has already received the goods and if the seller is not
familiar with LCs and makes a mistake in its documents so they are not compliant and rejected, of
if the buyer or its bank are unscrupulous, they can claim a spurious discrepancy in the presented
documents, refusing to pay. An LC is no better than an open account, but in fact worse because it will
cost both parties in bank charges.
The transport document and any export formalities should not show the seller as exporter or consignor,
and a carrier doing this would be completely incorrect and making serious misrepresentations which
could come back to the detriment of the seller. For example if the carrier made an error in the export
Trade Finance Global (TFG) is the leading trade finance platform. We assist companies to access trade and
receivables finance through our relationships with banks, funds and alternative finance houses.
Our award winning educational portal, Trade Finance Talks, serves an audience of 110k+ monthly readers
across 186 countries, covering news and insights across print & digital magazines, guides, research papers,
podcasts and video.
STRATEGIC PARTNERS
MEMBER ASSOCIATIONS
TRADE TEAM
[email protected]
ENQUIRIES
[email protected]
TELEPHONE
+44 (0) 20 3865 3705
WEBSITE
www.tradefinanceglobal.com
The Commentary on the Incoterms® 2020 rules is authored by Bob Ronai CDCS, a member
of the ICC’s Incoterms® 2020 Drafting Group, in partnership with Trade Finance Global
(TFG).
This 94 page e-book is designed to provide an Article by Article overview and commentary
of the Incoterms® rules, in plain simple English.
The views and opinions expressed in this book are those of the author and not of the ICC
or TFG.
Any excerpts quoted from the Incoterms® 2020 rules are the copyright of the International
Chamber of Commerce. Source: ICC website. The full text of the 2020 edition of the
Incoterms rules is available at https://2go.iccwbo.org/. The word “Incoterms” is a registered
trademark of the International Chamber of Commerce.