Scribd
Upload
143 views

AISC Design Examples

Uploaded by

Zahid Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
143 views

AISC Design Examples

Uploaded by

Zahid Rahman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
Toirdl x Faxuvad- Tev'ornt Fadl. ow picettadas Craik Slendy elements ~ Ais EXAMPLE E3 BUILT-UP COLUMN WITH SLENDER FLANG! Given: Determine a built-up, ASTM AS72 Grade $0 column with PLY sn, « 10's ce flanges and a Posen x 7M io ‘web has sufficient available strength to carry a dead load of 40 kips and a hve foad of 120 kps m aval compression, The colunin’s unbraced length 1s 15.0 ft in both axes and the ends are pizmed. Ve 40 ips 120 hips Solu From AUSC Manual Table 2-5, the material properties areas follows. Buill-Up Column ‘ASTM AS72 Grade 50, ‘The geomeuie propesties are as follows: Built-Up Column d= 8.000, b= 10%in, yah + h= Min we te= "hin, From Chapter 2 of ASCE/SEI 7, the equited compressive strength is RED ASD. B= LaaO Kips) + 16(120 ips) B= akaps + 120 ps = 240 kips = 160 kips Built-Up Section Properties (ignoring fillet welds) (10% in. in) #74 in 19) (69 in, Jed length is the same for both aves, the weak axis will govern, Design Examples V1.1 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (7A in. JA i 12 (hin TH in, 12 1.= 210% in,)(% in.)(3.81 i 22 in.* Web Slenderness, Determine the limiting slenderness ratio, 2, from AISC Specification Table B4.ta case 5 tay f= R y 1A, therefore, the web en Note that the fillet welds are ignored in the calculation of h for built up sections e Flange Stenderness Calelate fe. AL from AISC Specification Table B4.1b note [3] Vite 4 ° Fain ain = 0.743, where 0.35 $k, $0.76 o.k, Use k, = 0.743 Design Examples 14.1 "AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION =133 % in = 140 D> hes therefor the flanges are slender For compression members with slender elements, Section E7 of the AISC Specification applies. The nominal compressive strength, P., shall be detennined based on the limit states of flexural, torsional and flexural-torstonal Duckling, Depending on the slendemess of die column, AISC Specification Equation E7-2 or E7-3 applies. Fs is used in both equations and is calculated asthe lesser of AISC Specification Equations E3-t and ES From AISC Specification Comunentary Table C-A-7.L, fora pinned-pinned condition, X = 1.0. ‘Because the unbraced length is the same for both axes, the weak axis will govern. Ky, _Lo(ison) 2a =659 Elastic Critical Stress F, for Flexural Buckling (Spec. Eq. E34) Elastic Critical Suess, Fe Jor Torsional Buckling Elastic Critical Swess, Fa for Torsional Buckling [Note: This limit state is not likely to govern, bu the check i included bere for completeness From the User Note in AISC Specification Section EA, 1, cnt 4 DA int ing? 4 = 1.050in* From AISC Design Guide 9, Equation 3.4, Design Examples V4.1 ANERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION Returs to Table of Contents E19 3 i geet ; xy F 2A in)(% in +74 in (i in) 4 3 0407 in Fx] BEC 4 gy} (Spee, EE) (eae |, j x (29,000ks)(1,05Din*) 1 } | EL + (11,2005) (0.407in*) | { (i80in Le ame) ; = Ta bsi> 59k sn” ‘Therefore, use F,= 65.9 ks. sp \, ee ate & ‘Slenderness Reduction Factor. O Q* 0,0. liom AISC Specification Section E7, where Qu 1.0 because the web is nt slender Calculate Q,, the uastitfencd clement (flange) reduction factor trom AISC Specification Secsion E7 1b) Determine the proper equation for Q, by checking limits for ATSC Specification Equations 67-7 to £7-9. 2140 ae previouly clelted [Ex To HOFER 64 [EE «og, [2000 eso. 745) cafe Ae Ay =133 FES ees emma (YY 1.47 [Ee 1.172.000 0.785) / F 0 si =u3 \ : oil beri JE& wertore, ats Speciation Egutin E78 apis 5) LE 5 vais-o65(4) is (Spee. Eq, B7-8) =1.415-0.65(140) | 0+ —_—_— =0977 2-00. =0.977(1.0) =0977 Nominal Compressive Srenguh Design Exanples 14.) AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL. CONSTRUCTION Retumn to Table of Contents E20 OTK an [200 10.97(50 ksi) = 115 > 65.9, therefore, AISC Specification Equation E7-2 applies nna ot |e, (Spee. 4, £72) ed 240 kips ok = 208 kips > 160 kips ok. Note: Buillup sections are generally more expensive than standard rolled shapes: therefore, a standard compact shape, such as a W8%35 might be a better choice even if the weight is somewhat higher. This selection could be taken directly from AISC Manual Table 4-1 avd plage s mek Mabe (Qs 21°C Sa 1) Hf Heb © Abedeg Clulat. Ga, ha @ = Bars f [- ay asl 2) He Hawg 5 Manley ound eb mole SO _ Ike Cabendele, Og y hen Re Bar U i boli Neb and flame Ure Atanrdes 3) IF hae Qe Banh cofenbsTE bie owl Qe Design Examples VICT AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STECL CONSTRUCTION Return to Table of Contents (atte sleler elements) ees . Tovs'enel & Flexuvel- Toyssehal Backup COLUMN WITH A SLENDER WEB Given: : Verify that a built-up, ASTM AS72 Grade 50 columa with PL1 in. x 8 in. flanges and a PLY in. x 15 in. web is, sufficient to carry a dead load of 70 kips and live load of 210 kips in axial compression. The cohumn length is 15 ‘ftand the ends are pinned in both axes. P,=70 kips ghoe P= 210k i Paid pds, 5 & on 7 as ee, cy Solution: From AISC Manual Table 2-5, the material properties ate as follows: Built-Up Column ASTM AS72 Grade 50 Fy = 50ksi : Fe= 65 ksi ‘The geometric properties are as follows: Built-Up Column “ : 4 =170in. From Chapter 2 of ASCEJSEI 7, the required compressive strength is: TRED. ASD P, = 1.270 kips) + 1.6(210 kips) Pz = TO kips +210 Kips 20 kis. = 280 kips, Built-Up Section Properties (ignoring fillet welds) ’ 5 A = 2(8.00 in.)(1.00 in.) + 15.0 in.(%4 in.) Ff =19.8 in? - = 2(1.00in)(8.00in) , 18.0in.(4 J ? 12 2 . Y Design Examples V4.1 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION Retum to Table of Contents E12 bh * 5 4 (Ain)(15.00 in)? | 2(8.00 in.)(1.00 in. 12 12 T= Yad? + = 2(8.00 in?)(8.00 i =1100int © Elastic Flexural Buckling Stress ——— oe From AISC Specification Commentary Table C-A-7.1, fora pinned-pinned condition, K'= 1.0. Because the unbraced length isthe same for both axes, the y-y axis will gover by inspection. Kt, sal oay(t.in) (Spec. Eq. E34) i = £229,000 ksi) 86.5)" costa J Elastic iticat To onal Buckling Stress & Note: Torsional buckling yeneraly wl not govern i XL, 2 KL; however, he ebeck ached bere wo illsirate theealeuation Lhe Fm he Ur Ne ASC Spin Seon, X Ce = $54 in‘ 16.0 in) 4 < =5,470 int " 5,470 Ae Design Examples V14.1 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION Retum to Table of Contents E13 3 From AISC Design Guide 9, Equation 3.4, j a pelt } 3 __ 2(8.00 in) (1.00 n+ (15.0n) (V4 in)" a = 5.41 int ne[ BEE oa (Sea Et 2 (29,000ks)(5,470in" f 1 ) =| + (11, 200ksi)(5.4tin!) | > {Ppa sonata cata =919hn 383 Tesi, een diag ine ons : Web Use Fem 38.3 ksi Gemen’ (cesme, yy hath Sle ele Sexless str sender Nags sing AISC ecient Tale Bh deterine On he fee emer FSS aeatSins Asc Speen Secon 7 Cateulatek wsing AISC Speciation Table BA 1b note kee if st = 0.516, which is between 0.35 and 0.76 For the flanges, Determine the flange limiting stendemess ratio, h, from AISC Specificarion Table BA. 1a case 2 er a , Ww ap 1 865 ‘therefore, AISC Specification Equation B7-2 applic. oe osst® |r (Spe x, £72 stn sent "con =285 ksi Nominal Compressive Strength Pym Foy (Spee. Ea, E7-1) = 28.5 ksi(19.8 in?) = Si Kips From AISC Specification Section BI, the available compressive strength is RED ASD 1 $= 0.90 =107 4P, = 0.90(564 kips) 564 kips = 508 kips > 420 kips ok, 167 = 338 kips > 280 kips ok | Design Examples V14.1 [AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION

You might also like