Analysis and Interpretation

Name

We have asked the respondents to fill their names which is optional.

AGE:
No. of
Age
persons
20-30 49
31-40 46
41-50 65
Above 50 43
Grand Total 203

Age
70 65
60
49
50 46
43
40
No. of persons
30

20

10

0
20-30 31-40 41-50 Above 50

Interpretation:
The Age of the Respondent is required because it might have an influence on the
spending habit of the respondent. Most of the respondents are in the age group 41-
50. The remaining sample is almost equally divided among the other three age
groups 20-30, 31-40 & Above 50.

Marital status:
 Martial No. of
status persons
Divorced 23
Married 80
Separated 22
Unmarried 78
Grand Total 203

Marital Status
90
80 78
80
70
60
50 No. of persons

40
30 23 22
20
10
0
Divorced Married Separated Unmarried

Interpretation:
The Marital status of the Respondent is required because describes a person’s
relationship with a significant other also known as Civil status. Most of the
respondents are classified as Married or Unmarried category. The categories such as
Divorced or separated are lesser in number when compared to the other categories.

Education:
No. of
Education
persons
Others 20
Post graduate 76
Professional 40
Undergraduat
67
e
Grand Total 203
 Education
250
203
200

150

100 76 No. of persons

67
50 40
20
0
rs te l te l
he ua na ua
ta
t d sio d To
O ra s ra d
tg o fe rg an
s Pr de Gr
Po Un

Interpretation:
The number of the Respondents in terms of educational qualification is required
because it might have an influence on the spending habit of the respondent due to the
changes in education level. The total sample size is 203 and we have considered the
respondents with different educational levels such as Undergraduate, Professional,
Post Graduate and others, where most respondents are from PG category.

Profession:
No. of
Profession
persons
Accountant 1
Advocate 1
Agent 1
Agriculture 1
Architect 1
Architecture 1
Artist 1
Assistant Professor 2
Assistant Professor 2
Asst. Manager 1
Bank Employee 2
Banking 2
Business 8
Business Owner 1
Business women 1
 Businessman 13
Chef 1
Clerical 1
Clerk 1
Consultant 2
Contractor 1
Corporate employee 1
Dentist 2
Design Engineer 1
Doctor 2
DOCTOR 1
Drawing teacher 1
Employee 1
Employee in education
1
department
Engineer 6
entrepreneur 1
Financial advisor 1
Goldsmith 5
Govt servant 1
Home maker 2
Home maker 3
Homemaker 1
House wife 6
Housewife 3
Insurance Advisor 1
IT 2
IT employee 2
IT service 1
Junior lecturer 1
Lawuer 1
Lawyer 5
Lecturer 2
M.R.O 1
Manager 2
MBA 1
Mba Student at Sdmimd 1
None 1
Nurse 2
Office Asst. 2
Painter /contractor 1
PG Student 1
PGDM 1
Pharmacist 1
PhD 1
Political background 1
Postal dept. 1
Process associate 1
Proprietor 1
 Pvt.service 1
Real estate Builder 1
Retired 1
Retired bank employee 1
Sales consultant 1
Security Business 1
Seeking 1
Self employed 1
Senior Systems Engineer at
1
Infosys Limited
Software developer 2
Software Employee 2
Software employer 1
Software engineer 1
Software engineer 4
Student 3
Student 1
Supervisor 1
Systems Engineer 1
Tax analyst 1
Teacher 9
Teaching 7
Teachng 1
Unemployed 1
Grand Total 162

Interpretation:
The number of the Respondents in terms of profession is required because it might
have an influence on the spending habit of the respondent due to the changes in
education level. The total sample size is 162 and we have taken respondents from
various professions such as Teaching, Professional, IT, Businesses, Commerce,
Medical, CA etc.

Occupation:
If employed, type of
Organization  
Aided 1
Business 1
Government 32
Insurance 1
No 1
 Private 114
Student 1
Unemployed 1
Worked previously, but
now am a student 1
Zensar Technologies Pvt
LTD 2

120 114
Aided
100 Business

Government
80
Insurance

No
60
Private

40 Student
32
Unemployed
20 Worked previously, but
now am a student
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
0 Zensar Technologies Pvt
LTD
1

Interpretation:
From the data we can see that the majority of the respondents are private employees
and from the government we can see that the majority of them are students and few
of them are self-employed and employed.

Size of family:
No. of
Size of family
persons
2-5 151
Above 5 11
upto 2 41
Grand Total 203
 Size of family
160 151
140
120
100
No. of persons
80
60
41
40
20 11
0
2-5 Above 5 upto 2

Interpretation:
From the data we can see that most of the respondents are falling under the family
sizes comprising of 2 to 5 people are 151. Families having people of 2 are 41 while
families having more than 5 are only 11.

Dependents
No. of
Number of dependents
person
in a family
s
2-5 103
Above 5 2
Below 2 98
Grand Total 203
 No. of persons
120
103
98
100

80
No. of persons
60

40

20
2
0
2-5 Above 5 Below 2

Interpretation:
From the data we can see that most of the respondents are dependents which
comprising of 2 to 5 people are 103. Families having people of 2 are 98 while
families having more than 5 are only 2.It shows the dependents are more so the
investing pattern of the single earner differs.

Annual Income
No. of
Annual income person
s
3,00,000-5,00,000 45
5,00,000-10,00,000 77
Above 10,00,000 42
Up to 3,00,000 39
Grand Total 203

Annual Income

3,00,000-5,00,000 Interpretation:
5,00,000-10,00,000
Above 10,00,000 From the
Up to 3,00,000
above
 data we can see that majority of the respondents receive in the range of Rs 5,00,000-
10,00,000. this is the amount received every month could be due to rise in expenses
due to the rise in educational level. Respondents with annual income of less than
3,00,000 are being the least with 39 from the total of 203 respondents.

10.
Number of other No. of
sources of income in person
your family s
1 80
2 102
3 17
>3 4
Grand Total 203

Number of other sources of income in your

family
120
102
100
80
80 No. of persons

60

40

20 17
4
0
1 2 3 >3

Interpretation:

From the above data we can say that most people having other sources of income
with 2 are the highest with 102, whereas the people having other sources of income
with 1 are 80 in total. But we can observe that people having other sources of
income with 3 or more are the least with only 4.