British Chess Magazine July 2020
British Chess Magazine July 2020
Volume 140
JULY
2020
BORIS GELFAND:
MY WAY OF SEEING CHESS AND LIFE
GELFAND TALKS ABOUT HIS CAREER, HOW HE DEALT WITH DISCRIMINATION,
THE MATCH AGAINST ANAND, THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CHALLENGES OF A
CHESS PLAYER, THE FUTURE OF THE GAME AND WHAT WOULD KILL IT!
02007
044000
ISSN 0007-0440
770007
9
6 Issues for
$ 119.99
100 PAGES PER ISSUE
UNITED KINGDOM:
DELIVERY BY ROYAL MAIL
printed magazine
save
UK Non-UK
£55 £85
12 issues per year
postage included
subscribe
Purchase or renew your subscription and have BCM delivered to your door:
On-line: visit our website www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
Email: contact [email protected], we’ll get back to you right away
By post: write to BCM at Albany House, 14 Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire, England
RG40 1BJ with a cheque payable to British Chess Magazine Limited, your post and email
addresses (and if possible a contact phone number)
Save time, go on-line. It’s more convenient and better for the environment, why not do it
on-line. Enjoy priority support. No waiting for your turn, we are here for you 24/7. Anytime,
anywhere. If you’re on the move, read digital BCM from your handheld or other device.
Thank you for your continuing support!
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE, the World’s Oldest Chess Journal
www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
Editors
Milan Dinic and Shaun Taulbut
Prepress Specialist
Milica Mitic
414 Magnus Carlsen
would make a
good astronaut
Cover photography:
436 Quotes and Queries
David Llada International Chess in 1970
By Alan Smith
- When I see some of the recently publicised stories and claims about discrimination, I can
say that every Jew in the USSR (such as my parents, for example) has been discriminated
at least a 100 times more. However, being discriminated made me stronger. When I
was 13 my coach was told that I will never be allowed to take part in the World Junior
Tournament even if I qualified. The first time I was allowed to go abroad was when I was
19. Mikhail Gurevich, for example, was denied his right to play the Interzonal tournament
in 1985 which was the most important tournament that time.
I do not wish to sound insensitive in any way, but I just think that the whole idea that
some groups or populations are guilty is leading us nowhere, and previously led to gulags
and the Holocaust in the 20th century. There is no group discrimination and there is no
group guilt, that is my view. Currently, in chess I don’t see there is discrimination.
‘When I was 11, the Soviet Championship and puzzles online, play or watch lessons and
was in Minsk, my native city (1979, won by presentations on YouTube.’
Efim Geller - note, BCM]. This event had the
greatest influence on my decision to devote When it comes to computers, they brought
myself to chess. I could see the top masters about good things and bad things, says
playing and they gave me their autographs. Gelfand: ‘One needs to love chess to respect
There are many wonderful stories about these chess players. However, some people have
things - Peter Leko told me that when he was at very limited knowledge about chess but are
the Interzonal in Subotica (1987), Tal got out of very fast with using a computer and pointing
his seat - although the game had started - and out that ‘Magnus missed the best move’, as if
gave him an autograph. Also, you interact with finding that best move was their achievement
other chess players and the chess community. and not the achievement of the computer.’
You don’t have that in online chess.’
Furthermore, Gelfand thinks that computers
Internet, computers and can’t bring an unquestionable resolution to any
chess chess position, as it is often suggested. ‘Some
25 years ago some GM in the British Chess
Like most chess professionals, Gelfand Magazine wrote that he doesn’t understand
spends his days by a computer, analysing why a Grandmaster needs a second when they
games and positions. But it wasn’t always have Fritz or whatever. However, even today,
like that. ‘I grew up in an age where there one programme can suggest one move, another
was no internet. I remember making circles can suggest a totally different move. I now
around my local newsagent where they were analyse my games from 2010 and just ten years
selling Chess Informants, just to make sure I ago the engines of that time said one thing and
was there when they delivered them because now new engines say another. Very often my
only 10 copies were distributed for the whole intuition turns out to be right according to the
area. Today, people just switch on their phone new computers, but 10 years ago those engines
and they can see everything instantly. The said I was wrong. I think that’s an internal
Internet has enabled people to have lessons issue. People should focus on abilities engines
from anyone anywhere in the world, and it’s have and get knowledge rather than just seeing
not that expensive to get a qualified trainer to numbers and assessments which creates an
help you. Also, now you can do chess training illusion they know everything.’
The 2012 match between the then world Gelfand says he is in constant touch with
champion Viswanathan Anand and Boris Anand and that ‘maybe one day, we will go
Gelfand took place in Moscow. It was the over the match together.’
pivotal point of Gelfand’s career. After
defeating Mamedyarov and Kamsky, he Dealing with defeats
beat Alexander Grischuk in the finals of
the Candidates and qualified for the match Managing anger and frustration over a
against Anand. The first six games of the defeat is a big issue for all top people in
match ended in a draw. In Round Seven, sports, and chess is not an exception. This is
after a terrible blunder by Anand, Grischuk what Boris Gelfand does to soothe himself:
took the lead. However, he gave it back the ‘Each loss is a big blow. Each time one has
very next round just after 17 moves in what to find a way to get it all out - the anger,
still is the shortest decisive game in World the disappointment - and to play tomorrow.
Championship history. I try not to analyse the game or go deeper.
Instead, I try to go for a long walk.’ But, he
Looking back at the event, this is what comes clean in the end: ‘It’s not easy and I
Gelfand had to say: ‘Game seven was a don’t think I manage it that well.’
Why does
Carlsen
lose?
By GM Aleksandar Colovic
www.alexcolovic.com
When the World Champion loses, the reasons are not very different
from the ones connected to why Fischer lost his games
When I was reading the book “How to Beat as he has won all the tournaments he played
Bobby Fischer” by Edmar Mednis, I quite in, bar one. He doesn’t lose many games,
liked the fact that there was a classification but when he does, the reasons are not very
of the reasons why Bobby Fischer lost different from the ones Mednis defined
his games. There were several reasons for when analysing Fischer’s games.
Fischer’s losses, but the most frequent one
was that he was outplayed.
Sometimes it appears that
Carlsen is overtaken by a
There were also blunders and over− strong desire to do something
optimism, but mostly when he was losing,
the great Bobby was simply outplayed by
outrageous, as if tired of
his opponents. the constant need to play
“correct” chess. Whether this
(To those having the book in English, is intentional towards his
please don’t object to my use of the above
names of the categories as I don’t know the opponents, to show them that
exact terms Mednis used because I read the he can play literally anything
book in Russian.) against them, is difficult to
The World Champion continues to say, though sometimes it
demonstrate his superiority in online chess appears it is
396 | BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE
July 2020
Blunders
Carlsen was winning for most of the game, White is under pressure here as Black has
but he failed to convert and now blunders excellent compensation for the exchange.
a full rook. Carlsen completely misses Black’s threat
XIIIIIIIIY in the position and plays:
9-+-+-+-mk0 XIIIIIIIIY
9+-+-+rzpp0 9r+l+-vlk+0
9-+p+-zp-+0 9zpp+-+-+-0
9+-+-wq-+-0 9-+p+-+-+0
9nsnR+-+-zP0 9+-+pzP-wqp0
9+N+-+QzP-0 9-+-zP-snp+0
9-zP-+-zP-+0 9+-zPL+-+-0
9+-+-+-mK-0 9PtR-+-zP-+0
xiiiiiiiiy 9+-+QmKNtR-0
40.¦xb4?? xiiiiiiiiy
25.f3??
It was possible to stay in the game with
40.¦e4 £b8 41.£f4. It was necessary to remove the bishop from
d3 25.¥b1, with an unclear position.
40...£e1+ Picking up the rook on b4.
25...¤xd3+ 26.£xd3 £c1+ Winning the
41.¢h2 £xb4 42.£xc6 ¦f8 rook on b2.
Carlsen was out-prepared in the Open Ruy Carlsen made a very strong sacrifice in the
Lopez, but somehow managed to play all opening and had been winning ever since.
the correct moves. Now he’s still under Here however he misplays the attack:
some pressure, but the draw shouldn’t be XIIIIIIIIY
far away. Alas, he moves the rook one
square short: 9r+-+k+r+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9zppzp-+-+-0
9-+-+r+k+0 9-+p+-+-+0
9+-sN-+-zpp0 9+-+-sN-+p0
9R+-+P+-+0 9-+-wQPzpp+0
9+-+-tr-+-0 9+-vLP+-+q0
9-+n+-+-+0 9PzPP+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+-+-+RmK-0
9-+-+-+PzP0 xiiiiiiiiy
26...g3??
9+R+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy This allows White to establish a knight on
29...¦d8?? f3 that covers the king.
31...¦c8 32.¦d7 the pawn simply promotes. 28...b6! still allowed Black to stay in the
game; the point is to have the move ...c5
32...h6 33.e7 ¢h7 34.¦e1 White will at his disposal to block the a3–f8 diagonal.
promote next and then will win the 29.£e5+ ¢d7 30.£f5+ £xf5 31.exf5
pinned knight. should still be winning for White, but Black
can continue the game.
1–0
29.£e5+ ¢d8 30.£f6+ ¢e8
35...c4 35...¢f8 36.¥h4 ends the game 6...0–0 If Black wants to play ...d5 now was
immediately as Black loses material. the chance to do so. Still, theory claims that
White keeps an advantage after 6...d5 7 e5.
36.£xe7 c3 This loses more material, but it
didn’t really matter. 7.¥g2 ¦e8 8.0–0 c6 9.a4 Preventing an
expansion by ...b5.
37.£b7 ¦c5 38.£b6 Trapping the rook.
9...a5 Fixing the structure on the queenside
1–0 and securing either the b4 or c5–square for
the knight from b8.
Xiong also outplayed Carlsen in the 10.h3 A useful move, covering the g4–square
hedgehog with Black, taking over the so that the bishop can be developed on e3 and
initiative with a timely …b5 and then also to help a future expansion by g4, f4 etc.
demonstrating good technique to convert a
favourable endgame. 10...¤a6 11.¦e1 ¥f8 12.¥f4 Carlsen
decides to develop the bishop on f4, eyeing
The following game is very instructive the pawn on d6.
because of the tweet Carlsen posted
after losing it. He wrote that Dubov 12...¤c5 The knight exerts pressure on e4.
knows in which positions Carlsen feels
uncomfortable and he got him into one. 13.£d2 h6 Threatening ...g5, when thanks
to the pressure on e4 Black would win a
Magnus Carlsen - Daniil Dubov pawn after ¥e3.
Lindores Abbey Prelim chess24.com INT (10.2) 14.g4 Now the bishop can drop back to g3.
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 d6 The Philidor Defence was 14...£b6 15.¦ad1 ¥d7 15...£xb2? would
Dubov’s “secret weapon” in the Lindores lose material after the typical trap: 16.¦b1
Abbey tournament that he eventually won. £a3 17.¦a1 £b4 18.¦eb1
3.d4 exd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 ¥e7 6.g3 16.b3 ¦ad8 17.¥g3 ¥c8
Allowing another strike, this time in the 28...¤e4 29.£e3 ¥f5 Black’s pieces are
centre. swarming in.
23.¢h1 was safer, removing the king from 30.¥f3 ¦e7 31.£c1 £b6 32.¥xh5 gxh5
the exposed diagonal. 33.¦f1 ¦e6 34.¤f3 £c5
27...¥f5 was stronger. The pawn on c2 41.¤g3 would have allowed White to play
hangs and in case of 28.¤fd4 ¥e4 the on.
exchange of the light-squared bishops
favours Black as the white king will now 41...¤xe2
be eternally weak.
0–1
28.¤fg1? This is very passive.
28.¤g3! was the best move, hitting both Normally we are used to seeing Carlsen
knights at the same time. After 28...¤e4 show great technique and win from dry
29.¤xe4 ¦xe4 30.£d2 ¢h7! Black keeps positions, so seeing it the other way round
the initiative though White can fight on. is somewhat uncommon.
Hikaru Nakamura,Hi – Magnus Carlsen The exchanges haven’t made Black’s life
easier. In fact he exchanged his active rooks
Carlsen Inv Final 4 chess24.com INT (2.2) for White’s passive ones. The knight now is
coming to d3, from where it can go either
Black is fine in this position, as he controls to b4 or e5.
the only open file that gives him enough
counterplay because it distracts White 27...¤d7 28.¤d3 £b5 29.£c3 h5 30.£a3
from building up play on the kingside. But ¢g7 31.¤de5 Forcing a favourable
Carlsen’s next move is wrong. transformation of the pawn structure.
XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-+-+k+0 31...¥xe5
9+q+n+p+p0 XIIIIIIIIY
9-zpp+pvlp+0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+-zPp+-+-0 9+-+n+pmk-0
9-zP-zP-zP-+0 9-+p+p+p+0
9+-+-+NzP-0 9+qzPpvl-+p0
9r+-+NzPKzP0 9-+-zP-zP-+0
9+RtRQ+-+-0 9wQ-+-+NzP-0
xiiiiiiiiy 9-+-+-zPKzP0
22...bxc5?!
9+-+-+-+-0
This eliminates the possible threat of b5, but xiiiiiiiiy
by opening the b-file the white rook on b1 Keeping the bishop with 31...¤xe5 32.fxe5
becomes active. This will lead to exchanges ¥d8 is worse as after 33.£a8 ¥e7 34.£e8
of the heavy pieces and then White can £b7 35.h4 Black is completely tied down
use the greater mobility of his knights to and White will manoeuvre with his knight
get closer to the weak pawn on c6 - one to b4 or a5 to win the c6–pawn. Here’s a
of the knights can use the b4–square, made sample line: 35...£c7 36.¤g1 £b7 37.¤h3
available to White by Black’s last move. £c7 38.¤f4 £b7 39.¢h2! (39.¤d3?
£b1! allows Black to become active and
22...b5 keeping the b-file closed was draw) 39...£c7 40.£a8 ¥d8 41.¢g2 ¥e7
preferable.; 22...¦2a4 was also better, as 42.¤d3 ¥d8 43.¤b4 and the pawn on c6
now 23.b5 can be met by 23...¦c4. falls.
23.bxc5 £a6 24.¦c2 ¦xc2 25.£xc2 ¦b8 32.fxe5 £e2 Active defence. The idea of
26.¦xb8+ ¤xb8 27.¤c1 the move is to get the queen to g4 to keep
XIIIIIIIIY an eye on the d4–pawn.
9-sn-+-+k+0
33.¤g5 £g4 34.h4 ¤f8 Black’s knight is
9+-+-+p+p0 awfully short of squares.
9q+p+pvlp+0
As great as he may be, Carlsen
9+-zPp+-+-0
is also human so he loses
9-+-zP-zP-+0 games of chess from time
9+-+-+NzP-0 to time. That happens less
9-+Q+-zPKzP0 frequently than with the rest
9+-sN-+-+-0 of us, but it still happens
xiiiiiiiiy
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE | 405
07/140
Hikaru Nakamura
35.£d3 With the idea of £a6. goes for it. The engine prefers to keep the
queens on board.
35...£f5
XIIIIIIIIY 36...exf5 36...gxf5 was also possible, the
9-+-+-sn-+0 point being that after 37.¤h3 Black has
9+-+-+pmk-0 37...¤g6 preventing ¤f4.
9-+p+p+p+0 37.¢f3 f6 The only move to liberate the
9+-zPpzPqsNp0 knight from f8, otherwise White would
9-+-zP-+-zP0 have pushed e6 and won as in the note
to Black’s 37th move to the comment on
9+-+Q+-zP-0 Black’s 35th move.
9-+-+-zPK+0
38.exf6+ ¢xf6 39.¢e3 ¤d7?
9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy XIIIIIIIIY
35...¤d7? 36.£a6 illustrates White’s idea; the 9-+-+-+-+0
point is that after 36...£xd4 37.£a7 Black 9+-+n+-+-0
cannot save both the knight and the f7–pawn.;
35...¤h7? isn’t any better: 36.f3 £f5 37.£xf5 9-+p+-mkp+0
gxf5 (37...exf5 38.e6! fxe6 39.¤xe6+ ¢f6 9+-zPp+psNp0
40.¤d8 wins the pawn on c6.) 38.¤h3 with 9-+-zP-+-zP0
the idea of ¤f4, tying down Black to the
defence of the h5–pawn and then the white 9+-+-mK-zP-0
king will go to the queenside. 9-+-+-zP-+0
36.£xf5 The knight endgame looks very 9+-+-+-+-0
promising, so no surprise that Nakamura xiiiiiiiiy
406 | BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE
July 2020
Fabiano Caruana
Strangely enough, the decisive mistake. Ever since their match in London in 2018,
It’s difficult to understand the endgame, Caruana is Carlsen’s key opponent. In the
especially with little time in a rapid game. next game Carlsen is outplayed straight
out of the opening.
39...¢e7 was the only move - Black is waiting
for White to move the knight so his own knight Fabiano Caruana – Magnus Carlsen
can come to e6. 40.¤f3 ¤e6 41.¤e5 f4+! the
tactical justification. This is very unlikely to Clutch Chess Showdown Int lichess.org INT (3.9)
be seen and played and the fact that this was
Black’s only path to draw indicates how difficult 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 e5
the endgame was for Black from the very start. XIIIIIIIIY
42.gxf4 ¤g7 43.¤xc6+ ¢e6 Black is two 9r+lwqkvlntr0
pawns down now, but after ...¤f5–h4 he will
have counterplay based on the passed h-pawn. 9zpp+p+pzpp0
9-+n+-+-+0
40.¤f3 Now the white knight lands on e5
(supported by f4) and White is winning. 9+Lzp-zp-+-0
9-+-+P+-+0
40...¢e6 41.¤e1 ¤b8 42.¤d3 ¢f6 43.f4 9+-+-+N+-0
¤d7 44.¤e5 ¤f8 44...¤b8 45.¢d3 and
the king marches to b7. 9PzPPzP-zPPzP0
9tRNvLQmK-+R0
45.¤xc6 ¢e6 46.¤e5 White is a pawn up and
is still dominating. The rest is straightforward. xiiiiiiiiy
A rare line Carlsen switched to after losing
46...¢e7 47.¢d3 ¢d8 48.¢c3 ¢c7 with the more usual 3...e6.
49.¤d3 ¤d7 50.¤b4 ¤f6 51.¢b3 ¢b7
52.¢a4 ¤e4 53.¤xd5 ¤xg3 54.¢b5 ¤e4 4.0–0 ¥d6 5.c3 a6 6.¥a4 b5 7.¥c2 ¤ge7
55.c6+ ¢c8 56.¢b6 ¤d6 57.¤e7+ 8.d3
1–0
1–0
24.¦a3 £b4 25.¦b3 £a4 OK, So wants What to say about this decision? It is
to gain some time on the clock. particularly difficult to explain it in
online chess, when “it doesn’t really
26.¦a3 £b4 27.¦b3 £a4 No, So wants matter” and especially in a must-win
to draw and go home. situation – what do you have to lose?
Wasn’t the organiser’s idea to make chess
27...£a5 was also objectively better, as more exciting, to see games played until
the end, to see fights and tension and
28.¦a3 can be met with 28...£f5 with glorious efforts?
further ideas like ...(e8–d6 with excellent
play. So’s explanation was equally perplexing,
saying that he felt Caruana was the better
28.¦a3 player on that day and he didn’t feel
he should hope for more. So pocketed
½–½ $37,000 in prize money.
1.c4 e5 2.¤c3 ¤f6 3.g3 ¥b4 4.e4 This is Caruana’s attempt at an improvement.
what Carlsen played in the first game of the
tie-break in London two years ago, but also In the first game of this match Caruana
in the first game of this match. tried 6...¦e8 and this was met by 7.¢f2!?
“the first line” as tweeted by Anish Giri.
4...¥xc3 Caruana varies his choice After checking myself, this is indeed the
compared to the game in London where he first line of Lc0, while in his game against
played 4...0–0, allowing 5.¤ge2. Aronian from the same tournament Carlsen
went with the first line of Stockfish, 7.(h3.
5.bxc3 Carlsen has also tried the other
recapture. In a game where he must win he 7.d4 But Carlsen is ready. Now both players
chooses the less frequent option. follow the moves suggested by the engines,
but eventually it turns out the Carlsen’s
5...0–0 6.f3 b5!? understanding that the position is easier to
XIIIIIIIIY play with White was the correct one.
9rsnlwq-trk+0 They called it “Clutch Chess”,
9zp-zpp+pzpp0 the essence of which is to
9-+-+-sn-+0 give more weight in points
9+p+-zp-+-0 to games 5 and 6 (at the
9-+P+P+-+0 end of the first day, worth
9+-zP-+PzP-0 2 points each) and 11 and
9P+-zP-+-zP0 12 (at the end of the match,
9tR-vLQmKLsNR0 worth 3 points each) in a 12-
xiiiiiiiiy game match
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE | 411
07/140
7...exd4 8.cxd4 bxc4 9.e5 ¤d5 9...¦e8 is position and sensing it would be good to
an alternative, after 10.¢f2 ¤d5 11.¥xc4 be White here.
¤b6 12.¥b3 d6 13.f4 the character of the
game is similar to the game continuation. 13...dxe5 14.dxe5 ¤7b6 15.¥b3 £e7?
XIIIIIIIIY
10.¥xc4 ¥b7 11.¤h3 d6 12.0–0 ¤d7
13.¦e1 9r+-+-trk+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9zplzp-wqpzpp0
9r+-wq-trk+0 9-sn-+-+-+0
9zplzpn+pzpp0 9+-+nzP-+-0
9-+-zp-+-+0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+nzP-+-0 9+L+-+PzPN0
9-+LzP-+-+0 9P+-+-+-zP0
9+-+-+PzPN0 9tR-vLQtR-mK-0
9P+-+-+-zP0 xiiiiiiiiy
A move made on general grounds, but there
9tR-vLQtR-mK-0 was no time for that in this situation. To make
xiiiiiiiiy it worse for Caruana, after this single mistake
Black is undermining White’s centre, but in he’s lost and Carlsen elegantly demonstrates it.
the meantime White finished development
and with his pair of bishops and the 15...c5 was better, immediately trying to
position to be opened at any moment he create counterplay with ...c4.
has far easier play. The engines opine that
Black is fine here, but the human factor is 16.e6! Creating weaknesses in Black’s
definitely in White’s favour. This means camp. By forcefully obtaining the initiative
that Carlsen’s preparation was more on the kingside White renders all Black’s
profound, not looking only at the decimals light pieces unusable as they stay stranded
the engines show, but also feeling the on the other side of the board.
16...fxe6 17.¤g5 ¦f6 18.£c2 ¦g6 18...g6 The rest is easy. It’s not so much about
19.¥b2 wins material as the rook cannot the material advantage White has, but
move from f6 and leave the e6–pawn the strength of the bishops keep White’s
unprotected. attack going.
The game ended in a fast and sharp draw, S.K: Magnus Carlsen could become an
where almost all of the moves were astronaut. He is already playing chess "in
perfectly played. space" (nobody can’t beat him). Magnus is
also in excellent physical shape so I think
In a brief interview for BCM following it’s enough to be an astronaut.
the event, Karjakin shared his thoughts
about space and whether or not there is BCM: Would you like to travel to space or,
intelligent life out there. (Questions asked as a child, did you imagine of becoming
by Milan Dinic.) a cosmonaut?
British Chess Magazine: What was it like to S.K: I actually never thought about being
play against the cosmonauts? an astronaut but once my friends gave me
a wind tunnel flight where you feel like
Sergey Karyakin: The whole game was an you are in space. It was an interesting but
excitement for me! I was really nervous uncomfortable experience for me.
as it was my first experience. 400 km
away from the planet! I was playing the The world is so unpredictable
game and couldn’t believe it was real.
I admire Anatoly Ivanishin and Ivan that you never know if there
Wagner. I can’t imagine how difficult any intelligent creatures in
it could be to stay in the middle of
nowhere and to play such a brilliant game! the universe. It’s huge, so I
think that Earth is not the
BCM: Becoming an astronaut requires a
strong body and mind. Which current top only live planet. The question
players do you think have the mental and is if other members of the
physical strength to become astronauts?
Do you? universe play chess or not!
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE | 415
07/140
I watched the SpaceX launch, it was BCM: As the human race progresses
really impressive! The future is already technologically (including space travel), do you
here so maybe one day my flight to think chess should also transform (to include
space will be real too. I think that every new pieces or rules) or, should it remain as it is?
person in the world is interested in
exploring new entities. Especially when S. K: The traditional over-the-board version
you know that chess can exist there too! of the game has been around for more than a
thousand years and accompanied countless
BCM: Do you think there is intelligent life instances of human struggle. With progress,
somewhere in space? offline chess transformed to online.
During the pandemic online chess has
S.K: The world is so unpredictable that exploded in popularity and provided much-
you never know if there any intelligent needed social connections for long-time
creatures in the universe. It’s huge, so players and newcomers alike. So as for now
I think that Earth is not the only live these two forms — offline and online —
planet. The question is if other members are enough. But I don’t exclude any more
of the universe play chess or not! options in future.
Tour of
Knight
THE ETERNAL AND
EVERGREEN PUZZLE
By Awani Kumar, Lucknow, India
(Civil engineer, Indian Forest Service)
The knight, with its look and crooked move, has always been fascinating to chess players
as well as others. Unlike most chess pieces, its move has not changed for almost 1500 years
when chess was invented in India.
“The oldest of knight puzzles”, asserts
mathematics populariser M. Gardner, The challenge is to move a
“is the knight’s tour”. It is an old puzzle knight over an empty board
- over a millennium old − which has in such a way that it covers
attracted, enchanted, motivated, amused
and bemused innumerable people. Great all the squares in successive
mathematicians like Leonhard Euler and jumps, without visiting a
Abraham de Moivre have worked on it. It square twice
has unfathomable mysteries and continues
to throw up new results in spite of the voluminous literature produced over centuries.
No wonder British puzzlist H. E. Dudeney [1] said, “The knight is the irresponsible
low comedian of the chessboard.”
The challenge is to move a knight over an empty board in such a way that it covers all
the squares in successive jumps, without visiting a square twice. The knight’s tour is not
possible on a 4x4 board; the board being too small. There are 829740 knight tours on a
6x6 board and Figure 1 is an interesting example. Readers can check that it is a closed
(or reentrant tour), that is, starting and ending squares are connected by knight’s moves.
Moreover, it is a semi−magic tour having all the six rows (and two columns) sum up to 111.
There are 44 semi−magic - none magic − tours on 6x6 board. A magic tour has both the
rows and columns summing up to a fixed number called the ‘magic constant’.
A semi−magic tour has only rows or columns (but not both) summing up to the magic
constant. William Beverley, an English theatrical scene painter, was the first person to
construct a magic tour on a 8x8 board in 1848. It is shown in Figure 2. Here all the rows
and columns sum up to 260 but the two long diagonals add up to 210 and 282 respectively.
Using powerful computers and intelligent programming, an international team enumerated
all the 140 magic tours - none of them diagonally magic − on an 8x8 board in 2003.
A knight’s tour is possible on square boards of odd−numbered sides, that is, 5x5, 7x7 etc., but
there can’t be a magic tour or even closed tour on such boards. The reason is that the knight
jumps alternately between light and dark colour squares. So if one of the squares is even then the
next has to be odd. So, the rows (and columns) will have odd and even sum alternately. Based on
similar logic, readers can easily visualise that there cannot be a tour which starts at one corner
and finishes at the diagonally opposite corner on a board with even sides. Magic tours have been
constructed on 8x8 or 12x12 boards (and such larger boards) but they don’t exist on other even−
numbered boards, which are 6x6, 10x10, 14x14 etc. Jelliss [2], the greatest and indefatigable
compiler of knight’s tour literature, has proved that a magic tour is not possible on rectangular
boards with other even−numbered sides. The nearest the author could get on a 10x10 board has 15
magic lines (out of 20) as shown in Figure 4. Readers may like to improve upon it.
A conventional chessboard is of 8x8 size and we, the lesser mortals, find it unfathomable
even today. But J. R. Capablanca, the world chess champion from 1921 to 1927 and one of
the greatest players of all time, suggested chess on a 8x10 board. He passed away in 1942,
nearly 80 years ago. To commemorate him, the author has constructed 10 magic tours on a
8x10 board and dedicates the tours shown in Figure 5 to him. Readers can see that 8 rows
(out of 10) are identical. Such magic tours, like ‘twins’, are very rare. The author has also
discovered magic tours on 4x18, 4x20, 4x22, 6x12, 6x16, 6x20 and such rectangular boards.
2 9 94 97 52 43 46 61 64 37 505 Fig.4. Semi-magic tour on 10x10 board
95 98 1 8 45 60 53 36 47 62 505 (having 15 magic lines)
10 3 96 93 42 51 44 63 38 65 505
99 92 7 4 57 54 59 50 35 48 505
6 11 100 85 68 41 56 33 66 39 505
91 86 5 20 55 58 67 40 49 34 505
12 19 84 87 28 69 26 75 32 73 505
83 90 13 16 21 80 29 72 25 76 505
18 15 88 81 70 27 78 23 74 31 505
Fig.5. Magic tours of knight on 8x10 board
89 82 17 14 79 22 71 30 77 24 505 (Dedicated to J. R. Capablanca,
505 505 505 505 517 505 529 483 507 489 the 3rd world champion)
25 22 57 54 7 4 79 76 324 25 22 57 54 7 4 79 76 324
56 53 26 23 78 75 8 5 324 56 53 26 23 78 75 8 5 324
21 24 55 58 3 6 77 80 324 21 24 55 58 3 6 77 80 324
52 59 30 27 74 71 2 9 324 52 59 30 27 74 71 2 9 324
29 20 51 70 31 10 41 72 324 29 20 51 70 31 10 41 72 324
60 69 28 11 50 73 32 1 324 60 69 28 11 50 73 32 1 324
19 12 61 68 33 40 49 42 324 19 12 61 68 33 40 49 42 324
62 65 16 13 48 45 36 39 324 64 67 18 15 46 43 34 37 324
15 18 67 64 37 34 43 46 324 13 16 65 62 39 36 45 48 324
66 63 14 17 44 47 38 35 324 66 63 14 17 44 47 38 35 324
405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405 405
1 20 47 62 48 61 2 19 29 16 51 34 52 33 30 15
28 9 54 39 53 40 27 10 8 21 42 59 41 60 7 22
45 64 3 18 4 17 46 63 49 36 31 14 32 13 50 35
56 37 26 11 25 12 55 38 44 57 6 23 5 24 43 58
65 152 123 96 101 114 651 144 73 100 119 110 105 651
70 147 134 81 92 127 651 155 62 77 138 131 88 651
143 74 93 122 115 104 651 66 151 118 97 108 111 651
156 61 84 135 126 89 651 69 148 139 80 85 130 651
43 176 157 178 47 50 651 162 53 48 51 158 179 651
174 41 60 39 170 167 651 55 164 169 166 59 38 651
651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651
Layer 1 Layer 2
153 64 133 82 91 128 651 72 145 78 137 132 87 651
68 149 124 95 102 113 651 141 76 99 120 109 106 651
71 146 83 136 125 90 651 154 63 140 79 86 129 651
142 75 94 121 116 103 651 67 150 117 98 107 112 651
175 44 177 160 49 46 651 54 161 52 45 180 159 651
42 173 40 57 168 171 651 163 56 165 172 37 58 651
651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 651
Layer 3 Layer 4
207 194 9 22 31 188 651 10 23 208 195 186 29 651
8 21 26 189 192 215 651 209 196 191 28 25 2 651
11 16 193 216 185 30 651 206 201 24 1 32 187 651
210 197 190 15 36 3 651 7 20 27 202 181 214 651
17 12 199 204 33 14 479 200 205 18 13 184 203 823
198 211 34 5 182 213 843 19 6 183 212 35 4 459
651 651 651 651 659 663 651 651 651 651 643 639
Layer 5 Layer 6
Fig.8. Almost magic knight tour in 6x6x6 cube
(nearest approach with 100 magic lines, non-magic lines in red)
17 6 19 28 15 8 21 10 27 12 15 8
26 29 16 7 20 35 28 3 22 9 26 13
5 18 27 36 9 14 23 20 11 14 7 16
30 25 4 13 34 21 2 29 4 25 32 35
1 12 23 32 3 10 19 24 31 34 17 6
24 31 2 11 22 33 30 1 18 5 36 33
a. Area of polygon = 3 units b. Area of polygon =7 units
Fig.9. Square numbers as a knight’s path forming polygons with
(a) smallest and (b) largest areas
47 52 23 4 45 36 21 6 43 48 45 28 41 26 23 52
24 3 46 35 22 5 10 37 46 29 42 49 22 51 40 25
53 48 51 44 11 34 7 20 1 44 47 62 27 24 53 60
50 25 2 57 32 19 38 9 30 63 16 21 50 61 8 39
1 54 49 12 43 8 33 18 17 2 31 64 35 10 59 54
26 13 56 61 58 31 42 39 32 15 20 11 56 7 38 9
55 60 15 28 63 40 17 30 3 18 13 34 5 36 55 58
14 27 62 59 16 29 64 41 14 33 4 19 12 57 6 37
a. antelope {3,4} path b. {2,5} leaper path (nearest path)
Fig.10. Knight tour with square numbers in (a) antelope {3,4} and (b) {2,5} leaper path
3 14 25 22 1 12 5 12 35 28 25 14
26 23 2 13 32 21 36 27 4 13 34 29
7 4 15 24 11 36 3 6 11 26 15 24
16 27 6 33 20 31 10 21 8 17 30 33
5 8 29 18 35 10 7 2 19 32 23 16
28 17 34 9 30 19 20 9 22 1 18 31
a. zebra {1,4} path b. giraffe {1,4} path
Fig.11. Knight tour with square numbers in (a) zebra {2,3} and (b) giraffe {1,4} path.
The author has discovered just a few gems and readers are requested to mine more from
the vast and unfathomable ocean of the knight’s tour. In 2015, computer scientists found
its application in an image encryption scheme. In a mathematics journal, G. Ricard records
that “A great deal of research has gone into the knight’s tour puzzle”. Well, a lot remains
to be researched too.
References:
Awani Kumar works for the Indian Forest Service. His works on the Knight’s
tour has earned him place in the Limca Book of Records. He can be contacted at
[email protected].
RECURRING THEMES
By GM Ray Keene OBE
Checking my past games for inclusion in this column, I came across a curious phenomenon:
I seem to have won no fewer than five games against other players who have won the
British Championship in which I reduced my opponent to paralysis. Not quite on the same
epic scale as Nimzowitsch’s win against Saemisch (The Immortal Zugzwang Game) or
Nimzowitsch’s equally spectacular loss against Alekhine from San Remo 1930. However,
paralysis formed a significant theme in all cases.
My victims included Bob Wade, Len Barden and George Botterill, all of whom simply
ran out of useful moves, but the most spectacular were two wins against ten times British
Champion Jonathan Penrose where, coincidentally, I succeeded in establishing a white
knight on e6 which led to complete strangulation of Black’s prospects.
29...¦a8 White threatened a5–a6; something 2...¤c6 Timman - Adorjan, played at Wijk
had to be done about the inexorable advance aan Zee a few weeks before the present
of White’s a-pawn. encounter, took the following crazy
course: 2...¤f6 3 ¥b2 d5 4 cxd5 ¤xd5
30.¦xb7 ¦xb7 31.£xb7 £xb7 32.¦xb7 5 ¤f3 ¤c6 6 a3 f6 7 e3 e5 8 £c2 ¥e6
¦xa4 33.¦b8+ ¥f8 Or 33...¢f7 34 9 ¥d3 g6 10 h4 ¥g7 11 ¤c3 ¤xc3 12
¤xd6+ ¢e7 35 ¤b5. ¥xc3¦c8 13 h5 ¤d4 14 exd4 cxd4 15
hxg6 dxc3 16 dxc3 and White won. I was
34.¤g5 ¦a7 35.¤e6 ¦f7 quite prepared to copy that adventure, just
XIIIIIIIIY out of interest.
9-tR-+-vlk+0 3.¥b2 e5 This I do not like since it weakens
9+-+-+r+p0 d5, but it is doubtless playable.
9-+-zpN+p+0 4.¤c3 g6 5.g3 ¥g7 6.¥g2 ¤ge7 7.d3 0–0
9+-+Pzp-+-0 8.e3 d6 9.¤ge2 ¥f5
9-+-+-+-+0 XIIIIIIIIY
9+-+-+-zPP0 9r+-wq-trk+0
9-+-+-zP-+0 9zpp+-snpvlp0
9+-+-+-mK-0 9-+nzp-+p+0
xiiiiiiiiy 9+-zp-zpl+-0
With White’s Knight on e6 pinning Black 9-+P+-+-+0
down , Black is absolutely paralysed.
9+PsNPzP-zP-0
36.¢f1 ¦f6 37.¢e2 ¦f7 38.¦d8 ¦f6 39.¢e3 9PvL-+NzPLzP0
¦f7 40.f3 ¦f6 41.¢e4 h5 42.h4 ¦f7 43.¢e3 !
A waiting move allowing Black to experience 9tR-+QmK-+R0
the full horror of his situation. Black took the xiiiiiiiiy
hint. White has two clear winning methods: a) 10.0–0 It is possible to defer this and try
¤xf8, ¦xd6, ¦e6, ¦xe5 with two extra pawns, for O-O-O, e.g. Larsen - Kavalek, Lugano
or b) f3–f4 followed by a king march to c6 and 1970:1 b3 c5 2 ¥b2 ¤c6 3 c4 e5 4 g3 d6
liquidation to a won king and pawn ending. 5 ¥g2 ¤ge7 6 e3 g6 7 ¤e2 ¥g7 8 ¤bc3
O-O 9 d3 ¥e6 10 ¤d5 £d7 11 h4 f5 12
1–0 £d2 ¦ae8 13 h5 b5; although Larsen
won this game, the plan of O-O-O and
h2–h4 has never struck me as particularly
Raymond Keene - Jonathan Penrose convincing. Indeed, after the further
moves 14 hxg6 hxg6 15 ¤ec3 bxc4 16
Cambridge v Essex 1974 English Opening dxc4 e4 17 0-0-0 ¤e5 18 ¤f4 ¦d8 19
¢b1, Kavalek could have won with
1.c4 19...¥xc4 20 bxc4 ¤xc4 21 £e2 ¤xb2
22 ¢xb2 £a4! when Larsen would have
Trying a different first move. been demolished.
12.cxd5 ¤e7 13.e4 Naturally I wanted 24.fxg6+ fxg6 25.¥xh6 ¢xh6 26.£d2+
to encourage the exchange of light- ¢g7 27.¤g5 ¦xf1 28.¦xf1 ¤f6 Offering
squared bishops. the exchange to slow down White’s attack.
If 28...¤f8 29 ¤f7 £e7 30 £h6+ ¢g8 31
13...¥h3 14.£d2 ¦ae8 15.¦ae1 h5 £h8 mate.
FUSION: A REVIEW OF
"DUCHAMP'S PIPE: MARCEL DUCHAMP AND
GEORGE KOLTANOWSKI, A CHESS ROMANCE",
By CELIA RABINOVITCH, NORTH ATLANTIC BOOKS, 2020
cancellation of Belgium’s participation (the moves we did not make), the many
in that event. So he made his way to New geometries contained in the game.
York, where the initial circumstances led
to a return to diamond cutting. His whole It’s more than possible that much of this
family in Europe perished in concentration was lost on Koltanowski. In his - now
camps, so he had little reason to return. American - existence (he took citizenship,
married in 1946 and made his life there),
For Duchamp, chess inspired and chess- this showman of the board had to create
related themes appeared in a fair part ways to make money from the game. And
of his works during the 1930s. Already so he did. What he called his “phonographic
at the beginning of the 1920s he had memory”, meaning that he did not visualise
published with Halberstadt the booklet games in his mind but rather “hear them”,
on “Les Cases Conjuguees” and was led him to focus on blindfold simultaneous
fascinated by the silent symmetries of the displays. These were a tremendous
64 squares. In chess terms, this was the success. As Rabinovitch points out, such
heyday of the hypermodern movement, demonstrations of powers that seemed to
where concepts close to many present border on the occult drew large audiences
in the artistic world were of people who often
revolutionising strategic knew little about chess.
thinking. On return to Koltanowski likewise
New York, he met up gave public performances
with Koltanowski at the of “the Knight’s Tour”,
Marshall club. It was embellished with publicity
when they started playing stunts such as asking
there that Duchamp made the audience to call out
his gift. The pipe, with its numbers for each square,
echoes of the remarkable memorizing them, and
painting (“Ceci n’est pas then calling them out as the
Une Pipe”) by Magritte DUCHAMP'S PIPE horse continued prancing.
(another Belgian) was The American image of the
unusual, to say the least. Made of game was being transformed from that of
briarwood, chunky and probably not that a pursuit where Europeans from well to do
easy to inhale from, it emphasises solidity, families played inside stuffy, smoke-filled
tradition, craftsmanship of the everyday coffee houses and spent hours reflecting,
object (as pipes were at that time). It is to that of an “open access” business where
replete with associations. Surrealism the public could get involved and share
as an art movement drew heavily on some excitement. At the same time, the
ancient traditions and customs, and its redoubtable Koltanowski persuaded the
representations conveyed ideas and ideals “San Francisco Chronicle” to publish a
to be found in them. The notion of the pipe weekly column on chess (which ran for 52
and its ceremonial smoking as a symbol years), and conducted countless training
for peace is widely known. Duchamp, sessions for people to learn the game.
in talking about his performances on the Ever ready to use the media, he also made
chessboard, emphasised that, for him, radio broadcasts. He was confident that
the result was not so important (this is scientific progress would not threaten his
not war). He was instead concerned with activities. After giving a blindfold display
the symmetries, the unheard harmonies in 1960, he told an interviewer “Electronic
computers don’t know a damn thing about THE PRESENT CENTURY HAS
chess. I’ve played ‘em and beat ‘em.”
SEEN THE GAME GO RIGHT
The present century has seen the game DOWN THE KOLTANOWSKI
go right down the Koltanowski avenue.
From sponsorship on an important scale, AVENUE. FROM SPONSORSHIP
the great success of open tournaments, ON AN IMPORTANT SCALE,
introducing numerous formulae for speeding
up play, creation of a “Grand Tour” of elite THE GREAT SUCCESS OF OPEN
tournaments, through to Magnus’ personal TOURNAMENTS, INTRODUCING
and highly successful endeavours to leverage
NUMEROUS FORMULAE FOR
his fame and find funding for the COVID
online existence where we are right now, SPEEDING UP PLAY
Problem
World
by Christopher Jones
[email protected]
Grandmaster of Chess Composition
Solutions are given on page 446
1
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-tr0
9vl-zp-tRN+-0
9K+k+-+-+0
9+-+-tr-+-0
9-+-+P+-+0
2
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-wQ-+-+0
9zpp+p+p+-0
9-+-+L+-+0
9+-+p+-+n0
9-zP-mk-+p+0
9+-+P+-+-0
9-+-mK-+-+0
9+N+-vLL+-0 9+-+ntR-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
3 4
John Rice (Surbiton) Kabe Moen (USA)
Mate in 2 Mate in 2
Original ORIGINAL
XIIIIIIIIY XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+K+0 9-snK+-+-+0
9+-vl-+-wQ-0 9+Rzp-+-+-0
9-+-+p+p+0 9q+p+-+pzp0
9+-+-+-+-0 9sn-zp-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0 9-+p+-+R+0
9+-+-+-wqk0 9+pzP-+ksN-0
9-+-+-+r+0 9-zP-+lzp-+0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
Barry Barnes (Rochester) Abdelaziz Onkoud (France)
Helpmate in 2 (b)Pg6>h4 Helpmate in 3 − 2 solutions
ORIGINAL ORIGINAL
Openings
for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro, [email protected]
20...¢xf7 21.¤h5
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+r+-tr0
9zppvl-+kzp-0
9-+p+-+-zp0
9+-+-+l+N0
9-+-+-+-+0
XIIIIIIIIY 9+-zP-vLP+P0
9r+-+q+ktr0 9PzP-+-zP-+0
9zpp+-+-zp-0 9tR-+-mK-tR-0
9-+p+-+-zp0 xiiiiiiiiy
It was at this point that I started to wonder if
9vl-+p+l+-0 our pre-teenager knew all the castling rules.
9-+-+-sN-+0 Did Fischer think the rook couldn’t cross a
square attacked by the bishop? Don’t laugh.
9+-zP-vLP+P0 Grandmaster Averbakh against Purdy in 1960
9PzP-+-zP-+0 thought the same thing. When Purdy castled
9tR-+QmK-tR-0 queenside, he had to explain that a rook could.
Averbakh replied something like, “Only the
xiiiiiiiiy king, not the rook?” Just look at the course of the
This is how an opening advantage slips game here. Fischer practically invites the bishop
away. Once you have an advantage, you off the h7–b1 diagonal and then castles. It’s just
have to play forcefully yet keep alert for a suspicion, but when immediate castling was
tactics that can get your opponent back in a better move, you have to wonder... 21.0–0–0.
the game. This is what has happened here.
21...g6 22.¤g3 ¥xh3 23.0–0–0 ¦d8 Black
17.¤xd5!? A mate threat would have might have tried to use the h-pawn to win,
been more consistent with the R on g1 despite opposite-coloured bishops, with
and a N able to go to h5: 17.£d4 £f7 23...¥xg3 24.¦xg3 ¥f5.
18.¤h5 ¥g6 19.¤f4 and a draw can be
agreed. Fischer wants the d-pawn. Still 24.¦xd8 ¥xd8 25.¦h1 ¥g2 26.¦xh6
playing for a win? ¦xh6 27.¥xh6 ¥xf3 28.¥e3
½–½
17...£f7 Obviously not 17...cxd5 18.£xd5+±.
A curious historical piece. I hope you
18.¤f4 ¦e8?! White seems to have lost the enjoyed the deep “opening theory” of the
thread of what he was supposed to do. He bishop sac in the fork trick. Next time out,
should have got those rooks to the centre a we will look at a line in the fork trick that
lot earlier. 18...¢h7. Tartakower took rather seriously.
Mikha
i
Botvin l
nik
y
Anatol
Karpov
Bobby Fischer
The Match of the Century at Belgrade saw the meeting of the Soviet Union’s ten best
players and the ten best from the Rest of the World.
Fischer was due to play top board vs Spassky, but under pressure from Bent Larsen he
was persuaded to play board two, thus neatly sidestepping any Soviet preparation on those
boards. (A behind the scenes account of the Match was published in our June issue!)
Before Belgrade, Fischer had beaten Petrosian just once, at Bled 1961. In the first two
rounds he scored back−to−back wins.
Viktor Korchnoi
Ljubom
i
Ljuboj r
evic hik
Kupreic
or
Vikt
The USSR scraped home by the margin of (It should be noted that Fischer qualified
a point, but Larsen, Fischer, Portisch and for, but did not take up his place at, the
Hort all made plus scores for the Rest of Amsterdam Interzonal in 1964.)
the World.
Fischer was not at his absolute best at the
Yugoslav chess organisers capitalised on Siegen Olympiad and lost his individual
the presence of so many stellar names game to Spassky. The opening was a
by putting on a 5− minute chess event at reprise of the Exchange Grünfeld with
Herceg Novi. Fischer won with +17=4−1. which Fischer had lost to Spassky at Santa
Monica 1966. (The Fischer of 1972 would
Three days later the chess circus resumed not be so obliging.)
in Rovinj. The second half was played in
Zagreb. Fischer outshone a strong field The Palma Interzonal ran for just over a
and scored +10=6−1 to finish two points month. The 24 players fought it out for six
ahead of Gligoric, Hort, Smyslov and places in the 1971 Candidates. Half the field
Korchnoi, with Petrosian in sixth a further had qualified for previous Candidates and
half point adrift. four others would do so in the future.
This victory was probably the best of his Tudev Uitumen of Mongolia was the
career thus far and when he also won at early leader, but Fischer was a point
the Buenos Aires (+13=4), defeating his clear of the field after a round 5 victory
two closest rivals Tukmakov and Panno, the over Hort. He hit a quiet patch, losing
USCF persuaded Benko to cede his place in to Larsen in round 8, and Geller replaced
the Palma Interzonal to Fischer. him as leader.
The two met in round 12 and Fischer’s board. A victory at Vinkovci, where he
win in a drawn endgame gave him the defeated Gligoric and Taimanov, left him in
outright lead, which he never relinquished good form for Palma.
even when he conceded unlikely draws to
Jiminez and Uitumen. World champion Boris Spassky only lost
once during four events, and that against
After 16 rounds Fischer had a two−point Larsen in Belgrade.
cushion over the three players sharing 5th
place. He was first at Leyden (+2=10), then first
equal at the IBM, level with Polugaevsky.
After three more wins, over Rubinetti,
Uhlmann and Taimanov the destiny of the At Siegen his score of +7=5 was enough
First Prize was clear. to give the top board prize.
He continued in the same vein, finishing Other players shone brightly, if less
with +15=7−1, three and a half points clear frequently: Paul Keres at Budapest, Ljubomir
of his nearest rivals, Geller, Larsen and Kavalek at Caracas, Mark Taimanov at
Huebner. Taimanov and Uhlmann tied for Wijk aan Zee and Skopje. Korchnoi won
5th, a further point back. his Fourth Soviet Championship; the event
was held in Riga. David Bronstein won
(The original pairings entailed a last−round the USSR Cup, a knockout event held at
meeting between Smyslov and Taimanov. Dnepropetrovsk.
To avoid this, rounds 4 and 5 were switched
with rounds 22 and 23.) Mikhail Botvinnik played his last
tournament, finishing with a minus score at
In such an event even the favourites can Leyden. It was the end of an era.
struggle. Poor Hort never got going, while
Polugaevsky struggled to defeat the tail− Meanwhile other careers were blossoming.
enders. Portisch was on course for his third Ljubomir Ljubojevic was first equal
Candidates, but a penultimate round loss to at Sarajevo. Robert Huebner was a
Jimenez put paid to that. convincing winner at Sombor, and Anatoly
Karpov made his first Grandmaster norm.
Bent Larsen had an up and down start to his
year. First prize at Lugano in an 8−player Here are two interesting games from 1970.
double−round event. A plus on board One First, the battle of two Viktors and a win by
for the Rest, but then equal last at Leyden - the future World Champion.
tied with Botvinnik.
1–0
Yugoslavia was the second world chess power at that time. It was an era when Belgrade
was the second city in the world (after Moscow) for the greatest number of Grandmasters.
After hosting the ‘Match of the Century’ in Belgrade, instead of disbanding the chess
circus moved to the Yugoslav coastline - the beautiful city of Herceg Novi. It was the
beginning of April. Some players who took part in the Match of the Century had different
plans - the world champion Boris Spassky flew back to the USSR, while Botvinnik, Keres,
Gligoric and a few others went to prepare for other events. However, the two−day event in
Herceg Novi turned out to be one of the best blitz events in chess history, which involved
four players who were or would win the title of world champion in chess!
And the undisputed hero of the event was Bobby Fischer, scoring 19 points out of 22
games. Bobby defeated the rest of the USSR with 8.5 to 1.5. His scores were as follows:
2:0 against Tal; 2:0 against Petrosian; 1.5:0.5 against Bornstein. Only Korchnoi managed
to save his honour by staying even with the American, managing to win in one game!
The tournament was, effectively decided in the first round, when Fischer defeated ‘The
pirate from Riga’ with 2:0 who, for many years, was the undisputed blitz king! This was
also sweet revenge for the debacle against Tal in the 1959 Candidates (where Tal beat
Fischer in four games!).
22.e3 A pawn up and a powerful square on Mikhail Tal - Robert James Fischer
d4, the position is easily winning for White.
Herceg Novi blitz Herceg Novi YUG (1.1),
22...a5 23.¤d4 ¤xa3 24.¦xa3 ¥c4 25.¥f1 08.04.1970
¥d5 26.¥g2 ¥c4 27.¦a4 ¥d3 28.b4!
XIIIIIIIIY 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.¤c3 e5 4.¥c4 ¥e7 5.d3
¤f6 6.0–0 ¤c6 7.¤e1 0–0 8.f4 a6 9.a4 exf4
9-+-trr+k+0 10.¥xf4 ¥e6 11.¥xe6 fxe6 12.¥g3 £b6
9+-+-+pvl-0 13.£d2 ¤g4 14.¤f3 ¤d4 15.¦ab1 ¤xf3+
16.gxf3 ¤e5 17.¢g2 ¤g6 18.¤e2 ¤h4+
9-zp-+-+pzp0 19.¥xh4 ¥xh4 20.b4 £c7 21.bxc5 dxc5
9zp-+-+-+-0 22.a5 ¦f6 23.f4 ¦af8 24.¦b6 ¥g5 25.e5
9RzP-sN-+-+0 ¦f5 26.¦xe6 £f7 27.¦d6 ¥xf4 28.¦xf4
¦xf4 29.¤xf4 £xf4 30.£xf4 ¦xf4 31.¦d7
9+-zPlzP-zPP0 ¦a4 32.e6 ¢f8 33.¦f7+ ¢e8 34.¦xg7
9-+-+-zPL+0 ¦xa5 35.¦xb7 ¦a2 36.¢f3 ¦xc2 37.¦xh7
c4 38.d4 c3 39.d5 ¦d2 40.¢e4 c2 41.¦c7
9+-tR-+-mK-0 ¢d8 42.¦c4 a5 43.h4 a4 44.¢e5 a3 45.d6
xiiiiiiiiy ¦e2+ 46.¢f5 ¦f2+ 47.¢g4 a2 48.d7 ¢e7
28...axb4 29.¦xb4 ¦d6 30.¦d1 ¥c2 49.¦c8 ¦d2 50.¦e8+ ¢f6 51.e7 ¦xd7
31.¦d2 ¥f5 32.¦db2 ¦c8 32...¦b8 of
course was slightly more tenacious, but 0–1
after 33.¤xf5 gxf5, Black’s pawn structure
on the kingside is hopeless.
33.¦xb6 ¦xb6 34.¦xb6 ¦xc3 35.¤xf5 Robert James Fischer - Viktor Korchnoi
gxf5 36.¥d5 ¦b5 was more precise. Herceg Novi blitz Herceg Novi YUG (10.1),
08.04.1970
36...¦c7 37.¦b5 ¦e7 38.¥c4 ¦e5?
XIIIIIIIIY 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 ¥b4 4.e5 ¤e7 5.a3
¥xc3+ 6.bxc3 c5 7.a4 £a5 8.¥d2 ¤bc6
9-+-+-+k+0 9.£g4 0–0 10.¤f3 f6 11.¥d3 f5 12.£g3
9+-+-+pvl-0 c4 13.¥e2 b5 14.0–0 bxa4 15.¤g5 ¤xd4
9-+-+-+-zp0 XIIIIIIIIY
9+R+-trp+-0 9r+l+-trk+0
9-+L+-+-+0 9zp-+-sn-zpp0
9+-+-zP-zPP0 9-+-+p+-+0
9-+-+-zP-+0 9wq-+pzPpsN-0
9+-+-+-mK-0 9p+psn-+-+0
xiiiiiiiiy 9+-zP-+-wQ-0
Better to give up the pawn on f5 with 38...f4
or ¥f8. II is just a matter of time in any case.
9-+PvLLzPPzP0
9tR-+-+RmK-0
39.¦b7 ¢h7 40.¦xf7 ¢g6 41.¦c7 ¥f8 xiiiiiiiiy
42.¦c6+ ¢g7 43.¥d3 ¥e7 44.¥c2 ¦a5 16.cxd4 £xd2 17.£h4 h6 18.¤f3 ¤g6
45.¢g2 19.¤xd2 ¤xh4 20.¦xa4 ¤g6 21.¦fa1 a6
22.¤b1 ¤e7 23.¦a5 ¤c6 24.¦5a4 ¤xd4
1–0 25.¥d1 f4 26.¤c3 ¤c6 27.¤e2 ¤xe5
*Vladan Dinic is a Serbian journalist who started by writing on chess in the late 1960s and
afterwards moved into political journalism. He was the editor of several leading Yugoslav/
later Serbian papers. He currently edits a political magazine in Serbia called “Svedok”. He
has authored several books, including, “Fischer – the king of chess”, about the 1992 rematch
between Fischer and Spassky and the time he spent with them in Belgrade and Sveti Stefan.
The book was published in Serbia in 2008.
6 Issues for
$ 119.99
100 PAGES PER ISSUE
UNITED KINGDOM:
DELIVERY BY ROYAL MAIL
Endgame Studies
by Ian Watson
[email protected]
1 XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+p+-0
9-+-+-zP-+0
9+p+-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+K+-+-+-0
2
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+p+-+-+0
9zp-zP-+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+p0
9-+-+-+-+0 9PzP-+-+-zP0
9+-+-+-+k0 9+-+K+k+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
M Zinar M Zinar
Cirtdan 2018 Dvoretsky 70 MT 2017
3 4
draw win
XIIIIIIIIY XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-mK-+-+0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-zpP+p0 9+P+PzPPzPP0
9pzp-+p+-zP0 9-+kzp-zP-zp0
9mkp+-zP-+-0 9+-zpp+P+-0
9-zp-+-zp-+0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+P+-+-zP-0 9+-+-+pzp-0
9-+-+P+P+0 9-+p+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0 9+-+-+-+K0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
M Zinar M Zinar
Shakhmatnaya Kompozitsia 2017 Sosiura−120 MT 2018
Win Win
Back to Basics
Our world is returning to normal, after the greatest upheaval of our lifetimes. It won’t,
however, return to just how it was, so the second half of 2020 feels like a new beginning.
Let’s enter this new era by looking at the basics: here are four studies with pawns only. They
are all composed by the modern maestro of pawn endings, Mikhail Zinar. He has achieved
the same dominance over the field of pawn endings that Nikolai Grigoriev attained nearly
a hundred years ago. In 1935, in a tournament for composing pawn endgame studies,
Grigoriev won ten of the twelve awards; if there were such a tournament today, Zinar
could do the same.
Zinar will celebrate his seventieth birthday in November. In the anthologies, it says he was
born in 1951. That’s because his parents adjusted his recorded date of birth by six months,
hoping to postpone his eventual drafting into the army, and later on he didn’t try to correct
it, not wanting to get them in trouble for forgery. His first pawn endgame was published
in 1974, so maybe I’ll do a fiftieth−anniversary column in 2024.
These four are much more recent compositions of his. The first is indeed basic - simple
and easy? Well, it’s easier than the other three… The second will clearly involve Black
taking the h−pawn and getting boxed in and put in zugzwang, but the preceding play has
both sides trying to arrange that they aren’t the one in that eventual zugzwang. In the
third, the Black pawn cage around his king tells you there will be stalemate−avoidance
play. The fourth obviously begins with a knight promotion, so maybe you can guess
the theme.
Solutions to Problems
This month’s originals
We start with two very approachable 2-movers. In Kabe’s one, there are three threatening
queen moves to consider, but only one forces mate next move. In John’s opener, by contrast,
there is only one candidate move, but a wealth of play to enjoy when you examine its
consequences. Even newcomers to helpmates may find the BWBW# collaborative sequences
in the two parts of Barry’s example. The 3-move helpmate by Abdelaziz represents more of
a solving challenge, but in any event there is the option of reading on and enjoying the two
well-matched solutions!
1.¢b4 ¢g2 2.¢c5 b4 3.¢xb4 ¢f3 4.¢c3 1.f8£ fxg3 2.£f6 exf6 3.exf6 e5 4.f7 e4 5.f8¤
¢e4 5.¢d2 ¢f5 6.¢e3 ¢xf6 7.¢f4 e3 6.¤g6 hxg6 7.h7 g5 8.h8£ g4 9.£a1 mate.
draws. Not 2.¢xb5? ¢f3 3.¢c4 ¢e4
4.¢c3 ¢e5 5.¢d3 ¢xf6 6.¢e4 ¢g5 wins. Or 1…f3 2.£f4 fxg2 3.£d2 g1£ 4.£a2
I agree with the judge of the tourney, who mate.
said “2.¢c5 is marvellous.”
There is try−play: 1.f8¤? fxg3 2.¤g6 hxg6
Zinar 3.h7 g5 4.h8£ g4 5.£f6 exf6 6.exf6 e5
Dvoretsky 70 MT - 2017 7.f7 e4 8.f8£ e3 draws.
printed magazine
save
UK Non-UK
£55 £85
12 issues per year
postage included
subscribe
Purchase or renew your subscription and have BCM delivered to your door:
On-line: visit our website www.britishchessmagazine.co.uk
Email: contact [email protected], we’ll get back to you right away
By post: write to BCM at Albany House, 14 Shute End, Wokingham, Berkshire, England
RG40 1BJ with a cheque payable to British Chess Magazine Limited, your post and email
addresses (and if possible a contact phone number)
Save time, go on-line. It’s more convenient and better for the environment, why not do it
on-line. Enjoy priority support. No waiting for your turn, we are here for you 24/7. Anytime,
anywhere. If you’re on the move, read digital BCM from your handheld or other device.
Thank you for your continuing support!
BRITISH CHESS MAGAZINE, the World’s Oldest Chess Journal