Project: MBTA Project No. E22CN07, GLXC Project No.

4019139
DP24 New South Abutment SPL Wall Design
Temporary Condition 2 - Strength I
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020
2/12

ANALYSIS AND CHECKING SUMMARY

The following tables summarize cri cal resuls for all design sec ons. These results may include wall moments,
shears, displacements, stress checks, wall embedment safety factors, basal & slope stability safety factors, etc.
Summary vs Design Section
Base model Wall Moment Wall Shear Wall Displace Max Support Critical Support Embedment Comments
0: AASHTO LRFD (201 (k-ft/ft) (k/ft) (in) Reaction (k/ft) Check Wall FS
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (201 178.36 17.82 0 19.73 0.944 1.413 Calculation successful

Extended Summary
Table: Extended summary for all design sections.
Design Section Calculation Result Wall Displacement Settlement
Name (in) (in)
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia Calculation successful 1.93 6.85

Table: Extended summary for wall moments and shears for all design sections.
Design Section Wall Moment Wall Moment Wall Shear Wall Shear
Name (k-ft/ft) (k-ft) (k/ft) (k)
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia 178.36 1457.33 17.82 145.57

Table: Extended summary for wall stress checks for all design sections.
Design Section STR Combined STR Moment STR Shear Wall Concrete Service
Name Wall Ratio Wall Ratio Wall Ratio Stress Ratio FIC
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia 0.599 0.594 0.421 N/A
Table notes:
STR Combined: Combined stress check, along eccentricity line considering axial load and moment (demand/capacity).
STR Moment : Moment stress check, assuming constant axial load on wall (demand/capacity).
STR Shear : Shear stress check (shear force demand/wall shear capacity).
Table: Extended summary for support results for all design sections
Design Section Max Support Max Support Critical STR Support Support Geotech
Name Reaction (k/ft) Reaction (k) Support Check Ratio Capacity Ra o (pull
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia 19.73 161.19 0.944 0.756 0.944
Table notes:
STR Support ra o: Cri cal structural stress check for support (force demand/structural capacity).
Support geotech capacity ra o: Cri cal geotechnical capacity stress check (demand/geotechnical capacity).
Cri cal support check: Cri cal demand/design capacity ra o (structural or geotechnical).
Table: Summary for basal stability and wall embedment safety factors from conventional analyses.
Design Section FS Toe FS Toe FS Toe FS
Name Basal Passive Rotation Length
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia 2.273 N/A 98.529 1.413
Table notes:
FSbasal : Cri cal basal stability safety factor (relevant only when so clays are present beneath the excava on).
TOE FS Passive : Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available horizontal thrust resistance/Driving hor. thrust.
TOE FS Rota on: Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available resis ng moment/Driving moment.
TOE FS Length : Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available wall embedment/Required embedment for FS=1.0
Table: Summary for wall embedment safety factors from elastoplastic analyses.
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 3/12
Design Section FS Mobilized FS
Name Passive True/Active
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia N/A N/A
Table notes:
FS Mobilized Passive : Safety factor= Available horizontal passive resistance/Mobilized passive thrust.
FS True/Ac ve : Soil thrust on retained wall side/Minimum theore cally horizontal ac ve force thrust.
Table: Summary for hydraulic safety factors, water flow, and slope stability
Design Section Hydraulic Qflow FSslope
Name Heave FS (ft3/hr)
Base model Not analyzed Not analyzed Not analyzed
0: AASHTO LRFD (2012): Strength Ia 2.163 N/A N/A

Max. Moment vs Stage

Base Model DS: 1
M stg0 (k-ft/ft) DS: 0 DS: 1

Max. Shear vs Stage

Base Model DS: 1
V stg0 (k/ft) DS: 0 DS: 1

Max. Support F vs Stage

Base Model DS: 1
Rmax Stage 0 (k/ft) DS: 0 DS: 1

TIEBACK SECTION DATA

Name Fy Fc' Dfix Numbe Dinside Afree Efree Pa STR Pu STR PresGr FSgeo UserGcap Pa GEO Pu GEO WireModel
(ksi) (ksi) (in) Strands (in) (in^2) (ksi) (k) (k) (psi) (k) (k) Yes/No
Tieback 150 4 7 7 0 1.58 29000 189.6 213.3 35 1 True 189.6 237 Yes
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 4/12

ANALYSIS AND CHECKING SUMMARY

Summary of Wall Moments and Toe Requirements

Top Wall Wall L-Wall H-Exc. Max+M/Cap Max-M/Cap FS Toe FS Toe FS Toe FS 1 Toe EL. Slope
(ft) Section (ft) (ft) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft/ft) Passive Rotation Embedment (ft) Stab. FS
48.51 Wall 1 47.79 27.72 178.36/300.08 1.53/300.57 No Calc. 98.529 1.413 6.21 N/A

Summary of Basal Stability and Predicted Wall Movements According to Clough 1989 Method Wall: W
1. FSmin 2. DxMax (in) 2. Stiffness 2. FSbasal 3. Dx/H (%) 3. Stiffness 3. FSbasal
@ stage 0 @ stage 0 @ DxMax @ DxMax @ stage 0 @ Dx/H max @ Dx/H max
2.273 3.183 6 2.273 0.957 6.016 2.273

Basic information for supports

Support Type Elev. Z X Supports Angle Space H Free L Fixed L
Number (ft) (ft) Wall # (deg.) (ft) (ft) (ft)
0 Tieback 45 1.82 Wall 1 15 8.17 22.52 40
Notes: Space H= Horizontal support spacing
Fixed L= Fixed support length (tiebacks)
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 5/12
Free L = Free support length
Critical support reactions and stress checks
Support R.Max R.Min R.Max R.Min STR
Number (k) (k) (k/ft) (k/ft)
0 161.19 0 19.73 0 0.94
Notes: R.max = Maximum support reaction.
R.min = Minimum support reaction.
STR = Critical support capacity stress check = Load/Design capacity
General assumptions for last stage: Strength I
Load Combination 0 LC 0
Concrete Code: ACI 318-11
Steel Code: ANSI/AISC 360-10
1st Wall Limit Equilibrium Assume: Blum's method
Drain State Clays Default
Water γ= 62.4 pcf Simple flow
Drive-Wedge Ka, + δ-Coul
Resist-Wedge Kp,+ δ-DM7.2
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 6/12
Extended vs Stage
Calculation Result Wall Displaceme Settlement Wall Moment Wall Moment
(in) (in) (k-ft/ft) (k-ft)
Strength I Calculated 1.93 6.85 178.36 1457.33

Wall Shear Wall Shear STR Combined STR Moment STR Shear
(k/ft) (k) Wall Ratio Wall Ratio Wall Ratio
Strength I 17.82 145.57 0.599 0.594 0.421
Table notes:
STR Combined: Combined stress check, along eccentricity line considering axial load and moment (demand/capacity).
STR Moment : Moment stress check, assuming constant axial load on wall (demand/capacity).
STR Shear : Shear stress check (shear force demand/wall shear capacity).
Max Support Max Support Critical STR Support Support Geotech
Reaction (k/ft) Reaction (k) Support Check Ratio Capacity Ra o (pull out
Strength I 19.73 161.19 0.944 0.756 0.944
Table notes:
STR Support ra o: Cri cal structural stress check for support (force demand/structural capacity).
Support geotech capacity ra o: Cri cal geotechnical capacity stress check (demand/geotechnical capacity).
Cri cal support check: Cri cal demand/design capacity ra o (structural or geotechnical).
FS Toe FS Toe FS Toe FS Zcut FS Mobilized FS
Basal Passive Rotation Length (nonlinear) Passive True/Active
Strength I 2.273 N/A 98.529 1.413 N/A N/A N/A

Hydraulic Qflow FSslope

Heave FS (ft3/hr)
Strength I 2.163 N/A N/C

Support Force/S vs Stage

0:(El.45) k/ft
0:Strength I 19.727

Support Force vs Stage

Support Force vs Stage
0:(El.45) k/8.171 ft
0:Strength I 161.187

Embedment FS vs Stage
Min Toe FS FS1 Passive FS2 Rotation FS3 Length (from FS1, FS2) FS4 Mobilized Passive FS5 Actual Drive Thrust / Theory
Stage 0 1.413 N/A 98.529 1.413 N/A N/A

Table notes:
FSbasal : Cri cal basal stability safety factor (relevant only when so clays are present beneath the excava on).
Wall embedment safety factors from conven onal analysis (limit-equilibrium):
FS1 Passive : Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available horizontal thrust resistance/Driving hor. thrust.
FS2 Rota on: Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available resis ng moment/Driving moment.
FS3 Length : Safety factor for wall embedment based on FS= Available wall embedment/Required embedment for FS=1.0
Wall embedment safety factors from non-linear analysis:
FS4 Mobilized Passive : Safety factor= Available horizontal passive resistance/Mobilized passive thrust.
FS5 True/Ac ve : Soil thrust on retained wall side/Minimum theore cally horizontal ac ve force thrust.
Tables for stress checks follow: Support force/Design capacity

Support Check vs Stage

0: (EL= 45)
0:Strength I 0.944
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 7/12
Forces (Res. F, M/Drive F, M)
FS1 Passive FS2 Rotation FS3 Length FS4 Mobilized Passive FS5 Actual Drive Fh EQ Soil Fh EQ Water
(FxResist/FxDrive) (Mresist/Mdrive) (Embedment/ToeFS=1) (FxPassive/FxPas_Mobili / Theory Active
Stage 0 N/A 715844.59/7265. 18.78/13.29 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Reinforcement Requirements
Parameter Description
Note: Wall does not use steel reinforcement. Section does not apply.

SOIL DATA
Name g tot g dry Frict C' Su FRp FRcv Eload rEur kAp kPp kAcv kPcv Vary Spring Color
(pcf) (pcf) (deg) (psf) (psf) (deg) (deg) (ksf) (-) NL NL NL NL Model
Fill 125 125 32 0 N/A N/A N/A 300 3 0.31 3.26 N/A N/A True EXP
Glacial Till 135 135 38 0 N/A N/A N/A 626.3 3 0.24 4.2 N/A N/A True Linear
B2/B3 Bedroc 155 155 0 36000 N/A N/A N/A 300 3 1 1 N/A N/A True Linear

Name Poisson Min Ka Min sh ko.NC nOCR aH.EXP aV.EXP qSkin qNails kS.nails PL
v (clays) (clays) - - (0 to 1) (0 to 1) (psi) (psi) (k/ft3) (ksi)
Fill 0.35 - - 0.47 0.5 1 0 7.2 4.8 20 -
Glacial Till 0.45 - - 0.384 0.5 - - 35 19.3 70 -
B2/B3 Bedroc 0.35 - - 1 0.8 - - 0 0 0 -

gtot = total soil specific weight

gdry = dry weigth of the soil
Frict = fric on angle
C' = effec ve cohesion
Su = Undrained shear strength (only for CLAY soils in undrained condi ons, used as a cutoff strength in NL analysis)
Evc = Virgin compression elas c modulus
Eur = unloading/reloading elas c modulus
Kap = Peak ac ve thrust coefficient (ini al value, may be modified on each stage according to analysis se ngs).
Kpp = Peak passive thrust coefficient (ini al value, may be modified on each stage according to analysis se ngs).
Kacv = Constant volume ac ve thrust coeff (only for clays, ini al value)
Kpcv = Constant volume passive thrust coeff (only for clays, ini al value).
Spring models= spring model (LIN= constant E over the soil layer height , EXP=exponen al , SIMC=simplified winkler)
LIN= Linear-Elas c-Perfectly Plas c,
EXP: Exponen al, SUB: Modulus of Subgrade Reac on
SIMC= Simplified Clay mode

SOIL BORINGS
Top Elev= superior SOil level
Soil type= type of the soil (sand , clay , etc)
OCR= overconsolida on ra o
K0= at rest coefficient
Name: Boring 1, pos: (-65.617, 0)
Top elev. Soil type OCR Ko
47.22 Fill 1 0.47
20 Glacial Till 1 0.38
4.4 B2/B3 Bedroc 1 1

WALL DATA
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 8/12
Wall section 0: Wall 1

Wall uses wall section 0: Wall 1

Wall type: Soldier pile and timber lagging
Top wall El: 48.51 ft Bottom wall El: 0.72 ft
Hor. wall spacing: 8.17083333 ft Wall thickness = 1.817 ft
Passive width below exc: 5.85 ft Active width below exc: 3.833 ft Swater= 3.833 ft
Steel members fy = 50 ksi Esteel = 29000 ksi
Wall friction: Percentage of Soil Friction = 30%
Steel wall capacities are calculated with ANSI/AISC 360-10
Concrete capacities are calculated with ACI 318-11
Note: With ultimate capacities you may have to use a structural safety factor.
Soldier pile wall properties
Table: Soldier Pile Properties
Name Sec o W A D tw Or t bf tf k Ixx Sxx rX Iyy Syy rY rT Cw fy
(plf) (In^2) (In) (In) (In) (In) (In) (In^4) (In^3) (In) (In^4) (In^3) (In) (In) (In^6) (ksi)
W21x132 W21x1 264 77.6 21.8 0.65 12.4 1.04 1.54 6440 590.8 9.11 3649 294.3 6.86 6.86 39315 50

GENERAL WALL DATA

Hor wall spacing= Wall horizontal spacing
Passive width below exc= spacing for passive thrust pressure for classic analysis
f'c=fck= cylindrical concrete resistance
fyk=fy= steel rebar characteris c resistance
Econc= Concrete Elas c modulus
fctk= characteris c Concrete tension
Esteel= steel elas c modulus
TABULAR DATA (principal parameters)
1) Diaphragm wall (rectangular cross sec on)
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 9/12
N/A= data not available
Fy=fyk
F'c=fck
D=wall thickness
B=wall width
2)Steel sheet pile
DES=shape (Z or U)
W=width per unit of length
A=area
h=height
t=horizontal part thickness
b=width of the single sheet pile part
s=inclined part thickness
Ixx=strong axis iner a (per unit of length)
Sxx=strong axis sec on modulus (per unit of length)
3)Secant piles wall, Tangent piles wall, soldier piles, soldier piles and mber lagging
W=weight per unit of length
A=area
D=diameter
tw=web thickness
tp= pipe thickness
bf=flange width
= flange thickness
k= flange thickness+stem base height
Ixx= strong axis iner a modulus (per unit of length)
Sxx= strong axis sec on modulus (per unit of length)
rx=radius of gyra on about X axis
ry=radius of gyra on about Y axis
Iyy=weak axis iner a modulus (per unit of length)
Syy=weak axis sec on modulus (per unit of length)
rT=radius of gyra on for torsion
Cw= warping constant

DESIGN APPROACHES AND COMBINATION FACTORS

The Design Approaches (from Codes or Customized by the user) and related safety factors are the following:
Ftan fr=mult factor for fric on angle
F C'= safety factor on effec ve cohesion (Eurocode 7 methods)
F Su'= safety factof for undrained shear strength (Eurocode 7 methods)
F EQ= Load factor for seismic loads
F perm load= Load factor for permanent loads (dead load, etc)
F temp load= Load factor on live loads and other temporary loads
F perm supp= Reduc on factor for resistance for pull out checking of permanent ebacks
F temp supp= Reduc on factor for resistance for pull out checking of temporary ebacks
F earth Dstab= Load factor for driving earth pressures, unfavorable (on retained side)
F earth stab= Safety factor for passive pressures, favorable (on excava on side)
F GWT Dstab (ground water)= Load factor for driving water pressures, unfavorable
F GWT stab (ground water)= Load factor for resis ng water pressure, favorable
F HYD Dstab= Load factor for hydraulic heave, unfavorable (hydraulic checking)
F HYD stab= Resistance factor for hydraulic heave, favorable (hydraulic checking)
F UPL Dstab= Load factor for upli check, unfavorable
F UPL stab= Resistance factor for upli check, favorable
Stage Design Code Design Case F(tan F F F F(perm F(temp F(perm F(temp F Earth F Earth F GWT F GWT F HYD F HYD F UPL F UPL
Name fr) (c') (Su) (EQ) load) load) sup) sup) (Dstab) (stab) (Dstab) (stab) (Dstab) (stab) (Dstab) (stab)
0 AASHTO LRFD Strength Ia 1 1 1 0 1 1.75 1.11 1 1.35 1.33 1 1 1 1 1 1
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 10/12

EXCAVATION STAGES SKETCHES

A sequence of figures for each excavation stage is reported
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 11/12
Originator: SG Date: 4/2/2020
Checker: ALS Date: 4/2/2020 12/12

GENERAL ANALYSIS CRITERIA

Summary of stage assumptions

Name Analysis Drive ka-Mult Htr T/B Resist Res Contle

Method Press (%) Press Mult Method
Stage 0 Conven onal Ka+ δ N/A N/A Kp+ d N/A Free Earth

Name Support Axial Used Min Toe Toe Toe

Model Incl FSwall FDtoe FSrot FSpas
Stage 0 Simple span True N/A 1.413 98.529 N/A
Name=excava on stage name
Analysis method
springs = Elastoplas c spring analysis used
DR = Drained condi on for CLAY model
U = Undrained condi on for CLAY model for all the soils
Up = Undrained condi on just for selected soil
Limit equilibrium analysis se ngs
Drive press:
Ka (Ac ve pressure diagram), Ka-Trap = Trapezoid apparent diagram from ac ve pressures x mul plier,
FHWA= Federal Highway Administra on apparent pressure diagrams.
Ko = At-rest lateral earth pressures.
Peck = Peck 1969 Apparent earth pressure diagrams.
2 Step rect = Two step rectangular apparent earth pressure diagram.
User def. = User defined apparent earth pressure diagram.
Ka+d (and so on) indicates that wall fric on is applied
ka mult = mul plica on factor for Ka when Ka-Trap is selected
Htr T/B (%) = trapezoidal pressure scheme, top and bo om triangular percentage of excava on depth H
Resit press = Kp (passive earth pressures)
Res Mult = Safety factor applied directly on resis ng pressures (
COntle Method = can lever analysis method for limit equilibrium analysis.
Support Model: Method for calcula ng support reac ons in limit-equlibrium analysis.
Beam= support reac ons beam analysis (uses Blum's method).
Trib= support reac ons from tributary height calcula ons (Can be applied with apparent diagrams).
Axial Incl = Axial loads included for structural design
Used FS wall = Safety factor for axial+bending wall resistance to divide ul mate wall capaci es.
Min FD Toe= embedded minimum safety factor (for limit equilibrium analysis)
Toe FS rot= rota on safety factor (classic for limit equilibrium analysis)
Toe FSpas= driving/resis ng pressure safety factor (for limit equilibrium analysis)

SUPORTS REACTIONS (TIEBACKS, STRUTS, SLABS, RAKERS)

Support 0
Stage No R
(k)
0 161.187