Scribd
Upload
46 views

Surface Interp Tools

ArcGIS provides several tools for surface interpolation from sample data points, including spline, IDW, natural neighbor, kriging, and trend analysis. Spline fits a minimum curvature surface through data points, while IDW averages nearby points with closer points weighted higher. Kriging also weights nearby points but uses semivariograms of spatial structure rather than just distance. Trend analysis plots sample points in 3D and fits polynomials to projected scatter plots on axes, allowing rotational analysis of directional trends.

Uploaded by

RMolina65
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views

Surface Interp Tools

ArcGIS provides several tools for surface interpolation from sample data points, including spline, IDW, natural neighbor, kriging, and trend analysis. Spline fits a minimum curvature surface through data points, while IDW averages nearby points with closer points weighted higher. Kriging also weights nearby points but uses semivariograms of spatial structure rather than just distance. Trend analysis plots sample points in 3D and fits polynomials to projected scatter plots on axes, allowing rotational analysis of directional trends.

Uploaded by

RMolina65
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Surface Interpolation Methods

ArcGIS provides a number of different tools for creating an estimated surface from sample data
points. Selection of the proper tool is dependent on your modeling needs, knowledge of how the
tools operate, and the sample data set.

Spline estimates grid cell values by fitting a minimum-curvature surface to the sample data. It’s
like a flexible sheet of plastic that passes through each data point but otherwise bends as little as
possible. The difference between regularized and tension splines is one of flexibility: a
regularized spline has more "give" in it and produces smooth surfaces with estimated values that
may fall well outside the sample data range. Tension splines are less smooth but conform more
closely to the sample range.

Spline is usually better when:


-- the range of sample values may not include the extremes of the phenomenon being
interpolated
-- the number of sample values is relatively small. (Spline generally produces better surfaces
than IDW with sparse sample data sets.)
-- you want to see a surface with a smooth distribution of values.

IDW (Inverse Distance Weighted) estimates cell values by averaging the values of nearby
sample data points. The closer a point is to the center of the cell which is being estimated, the
more weight it is given.

IDW is usually better when:


-- you know that your sample data points represent the minimum and maximum values of your
surface. (Because IDW is an averaging process, all interpolated values are within the sample
range.)
-- you have line data that you want to use to interrupt the interpolation process. (For example,
you wouldn't want to interpolate elevation data over a cliff, or animal habitat data across a
river the animal couldn't cross.) IDW lets you set interpolation barriers of this kind.
-- you are more interested in the spatial variation near your sample points than in the smoothness
of the overall surface.
-- you have a large set of sample values

For most purposes, either an IDW or Spline interpolation with default settings will give you good
results.

Natural Neighbor
This is a tool that operates in 3D Analyst. It interpolates a surface from points using a natural
neighbor technique. The technique uses a weighted average of neighboring sample points and
creates a surface that does not exceed the minimum or maximum values in the sample data set.

Kriging
Like IDW interpolation, kriging forms weights from surrounding measured values to predict
values at unmeasured locations. As with IDW interpolation, the closest measured values usually
have the most influence. However, the kriging weights for the surrounding measured points are
more sophisticated than those of IDW. IDW uses a simple algorithm based on distance, but
kriging weights come from a semivariogram that was developed by viewing the spatial structure
of the data. To create a continuous surface or map of the phenomenon, predictions are made for
locations in the study area based on the semivariogram and the spatial arrangement of measured
values that are nearby.

Semivariogram(distance h) = 0.5 * average [ (value at location i– value at location j)2]

Trend
The Trend Analysis tool provides a three-dimensional perspective of the data. The
locations of sample points are plotted on the x,y plane. Above each sample point, the
value is given by the height of a stick in the z dimension. The unique feature of the Trend
Analysis tool is that the values are then projected onto the x,z plane and the y,z plane as
scatter plots. This can be thought of as sideways views through the three-dimensional
data. Polynomials are then fit through the scatter plots on the projected planes. An
additional feature is that you can rotate the data to isolate directional trends through the
values. There are many other features that allow you to rotate and vary the perspective of
the whole image, change size and color of points and lines, remove planes and points, and
select the order of the polynomial that is to fit the scatter plots.
Two other methods, Trend and Kriging, can be used with Avenue requests in the Map
Calculator. Trend estimates grid cell values by fitting a polynomial surface to the sample points.
Kriging uses geostatistical methods to create an optimal surface.

You might also like