Maclntyre 1961
Maclntyre 1961
.
1 Maclntyre
Department of Chemical Pathology. Postgraduate Medical School.
London. England
Page
.
1 Introduction ..................................................... 1
1.1. Historical; Background ....................................... 2
2. The Flame Photometer ............................................ 3
2.1. The Atomizer ............................................... 3
2.2. The Burner ................................................. 5
2.3. The Optical System .......................................... 6
2.4. Photosensitive Detectors ...................................... 6
2.5. Measurement of Emission ..................................... 6
2.6. Internal Standard Instruments .................................. 7
2.7. Commercial Flame Photometers ................................ 8
3. Fundamental Principles ............................................ 8
3.1, The Flame .................................................. 8
3.2. Emission Spectra ............................................. 9
3.3. Absorption Spectra ........................................... 10
3.4. Organic Solvents ............................................. 13
3.5. Interference ................................................. 14
4 Practical Applications ............................................. 19
4.1. Calcium .................................................... 19
4.2. Magnesium ................................................. 21
4.3. Determination of Magnesium and Calcium in Biological Fluids and
Tissues ..................................................... 23
.
5 Working Conditions ............................................... 26
6. Conclusion ...................................................... 27
References ........................................................ 27
I . Infroduction
It is the object of this review to provide a critical account of modem
flame photometry in the light of the basic principles of the method. No
attempt has been made to provide a catalog of the innumerable articles
appearing on the subject. but it is hoped that this chapter will help
clinical chemists to decide whether flame photometry is applicable to a
particular problem and perhaps to suggest ways of overcoming difficulties
with the method .
1
2 I. MAC-
1.1. HISTORICAL;
BACKGROUND
Herschel ( H l ) studied the emission of salts introduced into a flame;
he recorded [quoted by Mavrodineanu (M2) ] that:
“Salts of soda give a copious and purely homogeneous yellow.
Salts of potash give a beautiful pale violet.
Salts of lime give a brick red, in whose spectrum a yellow and bright
green line are seen.
Salts of strontia give a magnificent crimson. If analyzed by the prism
two definite yellows are seen, one of which verges strongly to orange.
Salts of magnesia give no colour.
Salts of lithia give a red (on the authority of Dr. Turner’s experiment
with the blow-pipe ) .
Salts of baryta give a fine pale apple-green. This contrast between the
flames of baryta and strontia is extremely remarkable.
Salts of copper give a superb green, or blue green.
Salts of iron (protoxide) gave white, where the sulphate was used . . . .
The colors thus communicated by the different bases to flames afford
in many cases a ready and neat way of detecting extremely minute quan-
tities of them; . . .”
Talbot ( T l ) had previously studied the flame spectra of lithium and
strontium, but the full potentialities of Herschel’s observations for qual-
itative analysis were first realized in the work of Kirchhoff and Bunsen
( K 1 ). These authors discovered cesium in 1860 and rubidium in the
following year by observation of their flame spectra.
Janssen (J1) suggested that spectral analysis, until then used only for
qualitative observations, was suitable also for quantitative work. He felt
that such a development would be particularly advantageous in the case
of elements like sodium which were difficult to determine by classic
procedures. His suggestions bore fruit 3 years later when Champion et
ul. (C1) constructed an instrument for the determination of sodium in
plant ash. A solution of plant ash was introduced into the flame by
means of a platinum wire and the emission intensity measured by com-
paring it by means of a visual photometric attachment with light from
a reference constant-intensity sodium flame. This “spectronatromAtre”
was the first flame photometer; and when one considers that it was
capable of an accuracy of between 2 and 5 %, it is interesting that it was
not for more than 70 years that the method was applied to clinical
problems.
However, the principles of flame photometry were not fully developed
until the brilliant work of Lundegirdh ( L l , L2). This worker devised for
the first time a satisfactory method of introducing solutions into the
FLAME PHOTOMETRY 3
4
H,
3 KI HI)
01
1
FIG.3. Atomizer constructed from two capillaries at right angles. Atomizer (two
vertical cross sections at right angles): (A) lower part carrying air inlet (B)and drain
for waste ( C ) . ( A ) is joined by the ground glass joint ( D ) to the upper part (E),
which carries the solution inlet ( F ) , the b d e plate ( G ) , and the outlet to the
burner (H).( F ) and ( G ) are mounted on ground glass joints (1, K), ( F ) is joined
by a piece of narrow rubber tubing to the vertical tube ( L )which dips into the
solution to be analyzed. (By permission of Doming0 and Klyne ( D 2 ) . )
that organic solvents can be used only in the integral atomizer without
difficulty and without producing an unstable flame. On the other hand,
flames cooler than air-hydrogen are not usable with type ( b ) ,while the
spray chamber-atomizer can be used with any flame.
2.2. THE BURNER
As will have been gathered from the preceding description, two main
types of burners are employed. The Meker type burner is most often
used for cooler flames. In this type the flame gases are mixed inside the
burner tube and are prevented from striking back by a grid at the mouth
of the tube, Different grids are employed for different gas mixtures, but
6 I. MACINTYRE
the orifices in the grid for the hotter flames are generally inconveniently
small so that frequent cleaning may be necessary; the integral atomizer-
burner has already been mentioned.
the greatest problems. In the author's opinion the extra cost entailed in
the provision of internal standard operation would be better expended
by providing improved optical resolution and more sensitive photocells.
FLAMEPHOTOMETERS
2.7 COMMERCIAL
There are many excellent commercial instruments on the market, and
it should be fairly simple to select a suitable model from the considera-
tions mentioned in the preceding section.
When the requirement is for many routine analyses of sodium and
potassium, a simple filter flame photometer burning a low temperature
flame should be purchased. Many such models are on the market. On
the other hand, if analysis for calcium and magnesium in biological
fluids is also required, then only a fairly complex instrument with mono-
chromator, photomultiplier, and high-temperature flame is satisfactory
(Fig. 4). Compromise instruments between these two extremes lose the
simplicity of the first type without gaining the versatility of the second.
3. Fundamenfal Principles
3.1. THEFLAME
A thorough study of flames is described by Gaydon and Wolfhard
( G1) ; for practical analytical purposes their most important character-
istic is their temperature. This is because the proportion of atoms which
are excited in the % m edepends critically upon the flame temperature
as well as on the characteristics of the element. Table 1 lists the tem-
peratures of flames which have been used in flame photometry. When
an integral atomizer-burner is used, aspiration of an aqueous solution
results in some lowering of flame temperature, perhaps by as much as
TABLE 1
FLAME TEMPERATURES
Temperature
Fuel-oxidant mixture ("GI
Coal gas-air 1840
Propane-air 1925
Butane-& 1930
Acetylene-air 2050
Hydrogen-air 2115
Hydrogen-oxygen 2690
Acetylene-oxygen 3110
Hydrogen-perchloryl fluoride 3300
Hydrogen-fluorine 4000
Cyanogen-oxygen 4850
FLAME PHOTOMETRY 9
Resonance NjIN,
line PjIP, T = 2000°K T = 3000°K T = 4000°K T = 5000°K
Ca 8521 A 2 4.44 x 10-4 7.24 x 10-3 2.98 x 10-2 6.82x 10-2
Na 5890 A 2 9.86 x 10-6 5.88 x 10-4 4.44 x 10-3 1.51 x 10-2
Ca 4227 A 3 1.21 x 10-7 3.69 x 10-5 6.03 x 10-4 3.33 x 10-3
Zn 2139 A 3 7.29 x 10-16 5.58 x 10-10 1.48 x 10-7 4.32 x 10-6
a By permission from Walsh (Wl).
12 I. MACINTYRE
/( ( fl
rectifier
. A
4
Chopper
3.4. ORGANIC
SOLVENTS
Organic solvents give a greatly increased sensitivity in emission work
and are most successfully used with an integral type of atomizer. The
organic solvents exert their enhancing effect either in aqueous-organic
solvent mixtures or still more when the organic solvent is used in 100 %
concentration. While several factors are of importance, the main reason
for this increased sensitivity is the increased flame temperature possible
with organic solvents, so that temperatures 200-300" higher than is pos-
sible with aqueous solvents can be attained. The exponential dependence
of sensitivity in emission work on flame temperature makes this increased
flame temperature very s i e c a n t . This subject has been most fully
studied by Dean (Dl). Table 3 records the enhancement possible when
organic solvents are used in place of aqueous solutions. By dissolving a
suitable complexing agent in an organic solvent, for example, 4-methyl-
2-pentanone, many elements can be extracted directly into the organic
solvent, which is then directly sprayed into the flame. This procedure is
TABLE 3
EMISSIONINTENSITY OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS
IN
WATERAND ORGANIC SOLVENTS~
Wave- Excitation Sensitivity
length potential (pg/ml)/(% T ) Enhance-
Element (mP) (ev) Water Organic men€
A1 396.2 3.14 67.0 0.5b 134-fold
Cr 425.4 2.91 5.0 0.16 50
cu 324.7 3.81 0.6 0.06c 10
Fe 372.0 3.3 2.5 0.125b 20
La0 560 2.21 0.5 0.05b 10
Pb 405.8 4.37 14.0 1.3d 11
Li 323.3 3.83 46.0 2.08b 22
460.3 4.52 12.5 0.7b 18
610.4 3.87 4.4 O.6b 8
670.8 1.85 0.067 0.007b 9
Mg 285.2 4.34 1.0 O.lb 10
Mn 403.4 3.08 0.20 0.018b 11
Na 330.2 3.75 12.5 0.9b 14
818 3.61 1500 125* 12
By permission from Dean (Dl, p. 63).
b 4-Methyl-2-pentanone.
0 Chloroform.
Gasoline.
14 I. MACINTYRE
Ionization in various flames for alkali and alkaline earth metals is shown
in Table 4 ( a and b). As the dissociation of an atom into ion and electron
has a dissociation constant, it follows that increase in the flame content
of electrons will depress the ionization. This is accomplished when
another element, also capable of ionization in a flame, is present in solu-
tion. This depression of ionization will lead to an increase in the number
of atoms in the ground state, with a consequent increase in the number
of excited atoms. The resultant increase in emission intensity of the
element being measured is referred to as cationic interference or enhance-
ment. Since this phenomenon depends on ionization, it will not occur in
cooler flames or with elements of high ionization potential. Thus, sodium
and potassium which have fairly low ionization potentials may be deter-
mined together without cationic interference in the coal gas-air flame,
although in the air-acetylene flame the presence of sodium will enhance
potassium emission and vice versa (Figs. 6 and 7). This type of inter-
ference is quite common and is to be distinguished from spectral inter-
ference. The effects can be readily minimized by adding excess of
interferent, so that ionization is fully depressed and independent of any
further variation in interferent concentration; or when convenient, the
interference can be entirely removed by a suitable selection of flame
temperature. Thus, sodium and potassium cause mutual cationic inter-
ference in air-acetylene but not in coal gas-air flames, while sodium
markedly enhances calcium emission in an oxygen-acetylene flame but
to a small or negligible extent in an air-acetylene or oxygen-hydrogen
flame. This type of interference has been claimed to be absent from
atomic absorption spectrophotometry, but this is rather a reflection of
the fact that the absorption method has been used with elements with
higher ionization potentials in relatively cool flames rather than to an
16 I. MACINTYRE
Ionization
potential Air- Hydrogen- Acetylene-
Element (ev) propane OXY OXY g*
Lithium 5.37 < 0.01 0.9 16.1
sodium 5.12 0.3 5.0 26.4
Potassium 4.32 2.5 31.9 82.1
Rubidium 4.16 13.5 44.4 89.6
Cesium 3.87 28.3 69.6 96.4
Calcium 6.11 < 0.01 1.0 7.3
Strontium 5.69 < 0.1 2.7 17.2
Barium 5.21 1.0 8.6 42.8
5By permission from Dean ( D l , p. 42).
From W. H. Foster, Jr., Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
May, 1959.
0 I00 2 00
10
FIG.6. Flame photometer readings for potassium; effect of sodium. Curve A, solu-
tions containing 2 mg K/100 ml (as KC1) +
Na (as NaCl), as shown by abscissas;
Curve B, solutions containing no K, but Na, as shown by abscissas. Asterisks denote
ordinate and abscissa for curve A only. ( B y permission of Domingo and Klyne
(D2).)
Atomic rotio K : No -
FIG.7. Flame photometer readings for sodium; effect of added potassium. In all
solutions 2 mg Na/100 ml (as NaCl); K (as KCl) added as shown by abscissas. ( B y
permission of Domingo and Klyne ( D 2 ) . )
FLAME PHOTOMETRY 19
plasma or serum. (2) Phosphate solution (10 ml) and sodium solution
(25 ml 200 mM NaCl) are diluted to approximately 700 ml in a volu-
metric flask. Perchloric acid (55.5 ml) is added and the volume is made
up to 1 liter. This solution is used for analysis of urine and fecal ash.
(3) H3PO4 ( 1 ml) is added to HCl (100 ml) and the volume is made up
to 1 liter. This solution is used for soft tissue analysis.
Procedure
The same dilution is used for analysis of both calcium and magnesium
in plasma or serum, urine, tissue ash, and, where possible, in fecal ash.
Occasionally a further dilution of the fecal ash solution may be appro-
priate where one element is in unusual concentration.
Readings are obtained for those standards just above and just below
each unknown sample reading, and the results are calculated by inter-
polation.
The normal (95% ) ranges for plasma or serum obtained with minimal
stasis from fasting subjects is 1.5-1.8 meq/liter for magnesium and
4.9-5.5 meq/liter for calcium. If heparin is used for an anticoagulant, it
should be purified by ion exchange resins, as samples of heparin are often
contaminated with calcium.
All glassware should be specially acid-washed and finally rinsed in
distilled water. All contact with filter paper or rubber stoppers should
be avoided.
The precision of a single routine estimation of calcium or magnesium
by this procedure is between 1 and 2%.
P l u m or Serum. One volume of plasma or serum is added drop by
drop to 9 volumes of combined diluting and deproteinizing fluid ( I ) .
The tube is capped with "parafilm" (A. Gallenkamp & Co. Ltd., London,
E. C. 2), and the contents are mixed by gently inverting the tube several
times, It is then centrifuged, and the clear supernatant is used.
Urine. Urine is diluted 10- or 20-fold with diluting fluid (2). Twenty-
four-hour urine specimens should be collected in a Winchester bottle
containing 10 ml concentrated HCl in order to prevent precipitation of
magnesium and calcium.
Feces. Specimens are homogenized, and a sample is dried at 105" for
16 hours. A known weight (approximately 1.0 g ) is ashed in a platinum
crucible at 400".The ash is dissolved in NHCl (200 ml HCl/g dry feces).
The solution is thoroughly shaken to ensure complete dissolution. The
solution is further diluted as required with diluting fluid (2).
Soft Tissues. Soft tissues are dried to constant weight at 105" and then
ground in an agate mortar with several changes of a mixture of equal
26 I. MACINTYRE
volumes of ethyl ether and light petroleum (b.p. 40-60"). Obvious tendon
is removed in the case of muscle. The powder is placed in the oven at
105"for 12 hours. A known weight (approximately 20 mg) of the dry fat-
free tissue powder is weighed into a platinum crucible and ashed at 400".
The ash is dissolved in diluting fluid ( 3 ) (4 m1/20 mg tissue powder).
The ash solution is suitable for the determination of sodium and potas-
sium by flame photometry as well as for calcium and magnesium.
Microanu2ysi.s. The methods described are directly applicable even
when only a small volume of plasma or urine is available. Magnesium
or calcium can easily be determined on 25 microliters of plasma with
the same precision as' in the macro-procedure. This small volume contains
approximately 2.5 pg of calcium and 0.5 pg of magnesium.
Twenty-five microliters of plasma are pipetted into a microcentrifuge
tube of approximately 0.4 ml capacity (Beckman Instruments, Inc.,
Spinco Division, Palo Alto, California). Then 250 pl of diluting fluid
(1) are added and the tube centrifuged in a microcentrifuge (Beckman
Instruments, Inc. ) . The supernatant fluid is analyzed by aspirating
directly from the micro-tube above the packed protein precipitate. It is
convenient to make an adaptor which will hold the small tube in the
sample turntable (Fig, 4) in the correct position for spraying.
The procedure may be still further scaled down in the case of calcium.
One or two microliters of plasma (0.1 or 0.2 pg of calcium) are pipetted
into the micro-tube. Then 250 pl of diluting fluid ( 2 ) are added and after
centrifugation the supernatant fluid is analyzed as described above.
5. Working Conditions
There are several essentials for the satisfactory operation of a flame
photometer when many analyses are to be undertaken.
1. A period of at least several weeks must be allowed between the
receipt of a flame photometer from the manufacturers and the under-
taking of clinical analysis. This is an absolute essential if the analyst is
to become thoroughly familiar with the working of his instrument.
2. The flame photometer must be carefully maintained. It is the
author's experience that an integral burner atomizer should be thoroughly
and carefully cleaned every day. In addition, one or two spare burners
should be available. These should be ordered when the flame photometer
is being purchased.
3. All reagents should be stored in polythene vessels.
4. An ample supply of deionized distilled water should be available.
5. Control solutions of composition unknown to the analyst should be
FLAME PHOTOMETRY 27
analyzed with every batch. Where the control solution gives a result
outside of the chosen confidence limits, the analysis should be repeated
and if the error persists the test solutions should not be reported and the
analyses should be discarded until the cause of the error has been defi-
nitely proven.
6. For satisfactory flame analysis it is essential that the analyst or his
supervisor should be conversant with the theoretical basis of the method.
Rule-of-thumb working will sooner or later result in serious errors being
made.
6. Conclusion
Relatively few reliable texts are available on the subject of flame
photometry, but recently a comprehensive textbook (D1) has appeared.
A full bibliography is given in this book and the whole subject is thor-
oughly covered. The reviewer has drawn heavily on this work in pre-
paring this review. For more detailed theoretical considerations the
reader should consult Mavrodineanu and Boiteux (M3).
REFERENCES
Al. Alcock, N., MacIntyre, I., and Radde, I., The determination of magnesium in
biological fluids and tissues by flame spectrophotometry. J. Clin. Pathol. 13, 506-510
(1960).
B1. Barnes, R. B., Richardson, D., Berry, J. W., and Hood, R. L., Flame photom-
etry; a rapid analytical procedure, Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. Ed. 17, 605-611 (1945).
C1. Champion, P., Pellet, H., and Grenier, M., De la spectrombtrie; spectrona-
trom8tre. Compt. rend. acad. sci. 76, 707-711 (1873).
C2. Cholak, J,, and Hubbard, D. M., Spectrochemical analysis with the air-
acetylene flame. Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. Ed. 16, 728-734 ( 1944).
D1. Dean, J. A., “Flame Photometry.” McCraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
D2. Domingo, W. R., and Klyne, W., A photoelectric flame photometer. Biochem.
J. 46,400408( 1949).
E l . Ells, V. R., The Lundegardh flame method of spectrographic analysis. J. Opt.
SOC. Am. 31, 534-542 (1941).
E2. Ells, V. R., and Marshall, C. E., The determination of exchangeable bases
by the Lundegirdh spectrographic method. Soil Sci. Sac. Am. Proc. 4, 131-135
( 1939).
G1. Gaydon, A. G., and Wolfhard, H. G., “Flames, Their Structure, Radiation
and Temperature.” Chapman & Hall, London, 1953.
G2. Griggs, M. A., Johnstin, R., and Elledge, B. E., Mineral analysis of biologic
materials; use of Lundegirdh spectrographic method. Ind. Eng. Chem., Anal. Ed.
13, 99-101 (1941).
H1. Herschel, Sir J. F., Treatises of sound and light. In “Encyclopaedia Metro-
politana; or System of universal knowledge on a methodical plan projected by
Samuel Taylor Coleridge,” 2nd ed., rev., p. 438. J. J. Griffin, London, 1848.
28 I. MACINTYRE