INTRODUCTION

Power system planning, design and operations require careful studies in order to
evaluate the system performance, safety, efficiency, reliability and economics. Such
studies help to identify the potential deficiencies of the proposed system. In the
existing system, the cause of the equipment failure and malfunction can be
determined through a system study. The modern interconnected power systems are
complex, with several thousand buses and components. The manual calculation of
the performance indices is time consuming. The computational efforts are very
much simplified in the present day calculations due to the availability of efficient
programs and powerful microcomputers. The following study tools are used for
power system analysis.

Digital computer - The main frame computers are used in power system
calculations such as power flow, stability, short circuit and similar studies. The
introduction of cheaper personal computers with the graphics capabilities has
reduced the computational costs. However, the results produced by the programs
are sophisticated and require careful analysis.

Transient Network Analyzer (TNA) - The TNA is a very useful tool to perform
transient overvoltage studies. The TNAs are small-scale power system models with
computer control and graphic capabilities. The TNA allows the use of statistical run
on the switching studies using circuit breakers. With the introduction of transient
programs such TNA studies can be efficiently performed with personal computers.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Microcomputer applications - With the advent of cheaper microcomputers
practically anybody can be provided with the necessary equipment. Data entry,
calculations, graphics and storage of the program-related documents are made very
simple. Many of the software programs from main frame are converted to
microcomputer applications. Also, the programs become more user-friendly and
very fast to execute with the larger memories available in the microcomputers. The
following microcomputer configurations are commonly used:

• A stand-alone workstation operated by a single user or a number of users at

different times. The programs and the data are stored in the microcomputer
memory.

• A workstation, which is part of a local area network, is another version of the

microcomputer application. In this arrangement sometimes the main software
is installed at the server and various users perform the calculations at the
workstation.

• Workstation connected to a central computer. This is similar to the local area

network, but the central computer may be a main frame or super computer.

• Large file transfer between various computer resources is achieved by e-mail

or through other Internet activities.

In all the microcomputer configurations, the printing or plotting devices is available

locally or at a centralized location.

1.1 POWER SYSTEM STUDIES

There are several power system studies performed to evaluate the efficient
operation of the power delivery [1,2]. Some of the important studies are:

• Impedance modeling.
• Power flow analysis.
• Short circuit studies.
• Transient stability analysis.
• Motor starting studies.
• Power factor correction studies.
• Harmonic analysis.
• Flicker analysis.
• Insulation coordination.
• Cable ampacity analysis.
• Ground grid analysis.
• Lightning surge analysis.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • EMF studies.
• Data acquisition systems.
• Relay coordination studies.

In this book, the nature of the study, a brief theory involved, practical examples,
criteria for the evaluation and typical computer software used in the evaluation are
described in a step-by-step manner for easy understanding.

Line Constants (Chapter 2) - The overhead transmission lines are supporting the
current carrying conductors. The conductor diameter, the resistance, the distance
between conductors, the distance of the conductors from the earth, the skin effect
factor, the soil resistivity and the frequency of the currents are some factors related
to the line parameters. Accurate value of the line constants are required for the
power flow, stability, voltage drop calculations, protection coordination studies and
other power system studies. The approach to the computer-aided calculations is
presented in this Chapter.

The underground cables are more complex than the overhead lines and the
parameter calculations involve the thickness of the insulation, shield and the various
materials involved in the construction. The approach to parameter evaluation and
examples are presented. The cable parameters are used in all kinds of power system
analysis. The calculated impedance values are presented in tables related to the line
or cable location. Sometimes there may be many line or cables involved in a system
and the parameters are presented in the impedance diagrams. Such diagrams will be
very useful in the system analysis.

Power Flow Analysis (Chapter 3) - Power flow studies are used to determine the
voltage, current, active and reactive power flow in a given power system. A number
of operating conditions can be analyzed including contingencies such as loss of
generator, loss of a transmission line, loss of a transformer or a load. These
conditions may cause equipment overloads or unacceptable voltage levels. The
study results can be used to determine the optimum size and location of the
capacitors for power factor improvement. Further, the results of the power flow
analysis are the staring point for the stability analysis. Digital computers are used
extensively in the power flow study because of the large-scale nature of the problem
and the complexities involved. For the power flow analysis, the acceptable voltage
levels are derived from the industry standards. The line and transformer loadings
are evaluated according to the normal, short-term emergency and long term-
emergency ratings.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Short Circuit Studies (Chapter 4) - The short circuit studies are performed to
determine the magnitude of the current flowing throughout the power system at
various time intervals after a fault. The magnitude of the current flowing through the
power system after a fault varies with time until it reaches a steady state condition.
During the fault, the power system is called on to detect, interrupt and isolate these
faults. The duty impressed on the equipment is dependent on the magnitude of the
current, which is a function of the time of fault initiation. Such calculations are
performed for various types of fault such as three-phase, single line to ground fault,
double line to ground fault and at different location of the system. The data is used
to select fuses, circuit breakers and surge protective relays. The symmetrical
component model is used in the analysis of the unsymmetrical faults and mutual
coupling.

Transient Stability Analysis (Chapter 5) - The ability of the power system

consisting of two or more generators to continue to operate after a change occurs on
the system is a measure of the stability. The steady state stability is defined as the
ability of the power system to remain in synchronism following relatively slow load
changes in the power system. Transient stability of the system is defined as the
ability of the power system to remain in synchronism under transient conditions
such as fault and switching operations. In a power system, the stability depends on
the power flow pattern, generator characteristics, system loading level, the line
parameters and many other details. Typical stability runs and the example results
showing the acceptable and not acceptable results are presented in this Chapter.

Motor Starting Studies (Chapter 6) - The majority of the load in the industrial
power system consists of three-phase induction and synchronous motors. These
motors draw five to seven times the rated current during energization and this
causes significant voltage drop in the distribution system. If the terminal voltage
drop is excessive, the motor may not produce enough starting torque to accelerate
up to rated running speed. Also, the running motors may stall from excessive
voltage drops or under voltage relays may operate. Further, if the motors are started
frequently, the voltage dip at the source may cause objectionable flicker in the
residential lighting system. By performing the motor-starting study, the voltage-
drop-related issues can be predicted. If a starting device is needed, the required
characteristics and rating can be determined. Using a computer program, the voltage
profile at various locations of the system during motor staring can be determined.
The study results can be used to select suitable starting device, proper motor
selection or required system design for minimizing the impact of the motor starting.

Power Factor Correction Studies (Chapter 7) - Usually, the power factor of

various power plants is low and there are several advantages in improving them.
The power factor capacitors provide an economical means of improving the power
factor. When the power factor improvement capacitor banks are installed in both

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 high voltage and low voltage levels, then there are several factors that require
careful consideration. Some of the important items are:

• Sustained overvoltages.
• Resonance frequencies of both high and low voltage capacitor banks.
• Voltage magnification at low voltage capacitor banks.
• Back-to-back capacitor switching.

In this Chapter, these aspects of the power factor correction are discussed.

Harmonic Analysis (Chapter 8) - Nonlinear power system loads such as

converters, arc furnaces and vapor lamps draw non-sinusoidal currents from the
source. The voltage distortion produced in the system depends on the system
impedance and the magnitudes of the harmonic currents injected. If the system
impedance is low, the voltage distortion is low in the absence of harmonic
resonance. In the presence of harmonic resonance, the voltage distortion is
responsible for interference in the computer system, additional heating effects in the
rotating machinery, overheating and failure of power factor correction capacitors,
additional line voltage drop and additional transformer losses. Also, the harmonic
frequencies induce voltage in the communication circuits. The harmonic analysis is
performed using frequency sensitive power system models.

Flicker Analysis (Chapter 9) - There are several industrial loads such as arc
furnace, traction load, a particle accelerator and motor-starting condition. If the
process of applying and releasing a load on a power system is carried out at a
frequency at which the human eye is susceptible and if the resulting voltage drop
great enough, a modulation of the light level of incandescent lamps will be detected.
This phenomenon is known as flicker. This Chapter evaluates the techniques for the
calculation of the voltage drop and using the frequency data in a graph to assess the
voltage flicker level. Also, certain measures to control the flicker in the power
system are discussed in this Chapter.

Insulation Coordination (Chapter 10) - The power system transients are

disturbances produced due to switching, faults, trapped energy, induced voltages,
inrush currents, ferro-resonance, loss of load, neutral instability and lightning. The
transients produce overvoltages, overcurrents and oscillatory behavior. The
overvoltages may damage the power system equipment due to flashover through
insulation breakdown. Usually a flashover will cause a temporary tripping and
reclosing operation. Permanent insulation damage will cause a sustained power
outage. Overcurrents can cause excessive heating and hence possible equipment
damage/tripping. The oscillatory type of transient may produce power quality
problems such as nuisance tripping, voltage notching, swings and sags. The power

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 system transients are modeled using the transients program and are analyzed in the
time domain. In this Chapter, the approach to the transient modeling of the power
system and solution approaches is presented with suitable examples. The transients
due to energization, de-energization, fault clearing, back up fault clearing and
reclosing are demonstrated with suitable examples. Approaches to minimize the
transients are also discussed in this Chapter.

Cable Ampacity Analysis (Chapter 11) - Cable installation in the underground

or in the cable trays are commonly used to transmit power within the generating
station. Also, the cables are used to transmit power at distribution level in the urban
areas. The current carrying capability of the cable is determined by the maximum
conductor temperature rise. This in turn depends on the conductor characteristics,
losses in the dielectric and shield and cooling arrangements. The analysis involves
the application of thermal equivalent circuits at the maximum loading conditions.

Grounding Grid Analysis (Chapter 12) - In the substations and generating

stations part of the fault currents are diverted through the grounding grids. During
the ground fault conditions the fault currents through ground grid causes the grid
voltage drop and hence the neutral voltage rise. The purpose of the safety analysis is
to evaluate the following:

• Grid potential rise.

• Maximum mesh voltage rise.
• Touch potential rise.
• Step potential rise.
• Allowable touch voltage and allowable step voltage.
• Safety performance analysis.

In order to calculate the above quantities, data for the soil resistivity, fault current
magnitude and duration and the geometry of the ground grid are required.

Lightning Surge Analysis (Chapter 13) - The lightning surge is one of the
major sources of external disturbance to the power system. The lightning surge can
strike the power system as a direct stroke or as a back flashover strike. The surge
current through the system depends on several factors such as the tower and
conductor configuration and the tower footing resistance. The system performance
is analyzed for the overvoltages without and with lightning arresters. The benefit of
having lightning arresters in the system to control the adverse effects of lightning
surges is demonstrated.

EMF Studies (Chapter 14) - Electric and magnetic fields exist wherever there is
electric power. Field calculation approaches are discussed both for the overhead
lines and underground cable circuits. The acceptable levels of radiated fields are

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 presented from various industry standards. This type of study can identify the levels
of field exposure and compare the existing levels with the industry standard values.
Some mitigation measures are also identified.

Data Acquisition Systems (Chapter 15) - The data acquisition techniques are
used to evaluate the power system performance under various conditions. When
there are several parameters to be measured in a system, a simple data acquisition
system can perform this function. When fast transients are to be measured, data
acquisition systems are used along with very small time step. There are several
types of data acquisition system software available for various applications. Also,
there are different communication protocols available to perform the data transfer.
In this Chapter, the following important data acquisition systems will be analyzed:

• Steady state analysis.

• Transient analysis.

These analyses include examples of performance analysis, graphical representation

and the approach for effective report preparation.

Relay Coordination Studies (Chapter 16) - The main objective of protection

coordination analysis is to minimize the hazards to personnel and equipment during
fault conditions. The studies are performed to select the fault-clearing
characteristics of devices such as fuses, circuit breakers and relays used in the
power system. The short circuit results provide the minimum and maximum current
levels at which the coordination must be achieved in order to protect the system.
Traditionally, the coordination calculations were performed in graphical sheets
using the time current characteristics. With the cheaper and faster microcomputers
available at the design and consulting offices, the time current characteristics of
various protective devices can readily be presented in graphical form. The
necessary settings can be calculated and presented along with the protective device
characteristics in order to verify the coordination.

Example 1.1 - A 160 MW cogeneration project is being planned for development

at a river bank. The plant will have one steam turbine driven generator unit of 90
MW 13.8 kV, 60 Hz, three-phase and a steam turbine driven unit of 70 MW, 13.8
kV, 60 Hz, three-phase. The generators will have individual circuit breakers and a
three-winding transformer, 13.8 kV/13.8 kV/138 kV. There will be one 138 kV
circuit breaker and a tie line to the other end of the river, which is 2 miles. Prepare
a simple one-line diagram of the proposed scheme and list the required system
studies.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Solution - The one line diagram of the proposed system is shown in Figure 1.1.
The required system studies are:

• Load flow analysis - To make sure that the line and transformer loadings are
within acceptable limits.
• Short circuit studies - To make sure that the circuit breaker ratings and relay
settings are performed to meet the new load flow conditions.
• Transient stability studies - To ensure that the system is stable under desired
operating and some contingency conditions.
• Cable ampacity studies - To select the 138 kV cable.
• Ground grid analysis - Ground grid for the substation and generating station
and related safety performance.
• Protection coordination studies - To get all the relay settings.
• Switching surge analysis - For insulation coordination.

PROBLEMS

1. A 520 MW cogeneration plant is to be developed at 13.8 kV level. The plant

will consist of six gas turbine units each 70 MW, 13.8 kV and two steam
turbine units with a rating of 50 MW, 13.8 kV each. The voltage is to be
stepped up to 345 kV at the local substation and the power is to be delivered
through a three-phase overhead line of 3 miles. Draw a one-line diagram of the
system and identify the ratings of the circuit breakers and step up transformer
units. What are the system planning studies required for this project? Refer to
Figure 1.1.

2. Is it necessary for the above developer (Problem 1) to perform harmonic

analysis? Explain.

3. There is a political form opposing the electric distribution system in a school

district. This is a health-related issue due to an overhead line. The electric
utility planners want you to look into this subject and recommend to them
suitable studies to be performed. What will be the recommendation?

4. A 230 kV transmission line is being installed between two substations at a

distance of 35 miles apart. There is a 340 feet river crossing involved in this
project and it was planned to install one tall tower at each end of the riverbank.
There will be one dead end tower following the tall tower for mechanical
considerations. Is there a need to perform special studies to reduce any risk
associated with this installation?

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 138kV
Circuit Breaker
2 miles

D-
138kVBus
ST Unit
MVA = 70 170 MVA
13.8 kV 13.8kV/13.8kV/138kV
Three Winding Transformer

Figure 1.1 One-Line Diagram of the Power Plant for Problem 1

5. A generating plant is proposed with four 200 MW generators as shown in

Figure 1.2. There are two step-up transformers and a ring bus arrangement to
connect the generators to the utility system. In order to proceed with the
project, what power system studies are required?

200 MW 200 MW

200 MW
200 MW

Line 4

Figure 1.2 One-Line Diagram of the Proposed Generating Plant and Ring Bus

REFERENCES

1. ANSI/IEEE Standard: 141, IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical

Distribution for Industrial Plants, 1993 (Red Book).

2. ANSI/IEEE Standard: 399, IEEE Recommended Practice for Power

System Analysis, 1990 (Brown Book).

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 2
LINE CONSTANTS

2.1 OVERHEAD TRANSMISSION LINE PARAMETERS

Transmission line parameters are used in the voltage drop calculations, load flow,
stability analysis, short circuit study, line loading calculations, transient analysis and
the performance evaluation of the lines under various loading conditions. The line
parameters are evaluated based on the installed line and tower configuration data.
The basic theory of line parameter calculations is involved and is explained well in
Reference [2]. The line constant calculation procedures suitable for computer-aided
analysis are discussed in this section.

Series impedance - The general method is well suited for the calculation of the
overhead line parameters as described in [1]. This procedure is explained using a
three-phase, 4 wire system shown in Figure 2.1. The voltage drop along any
conductor is proportional to the current. In steady state, the relation between the
voltage drop, impedance and the current is given by:
dV
[—] = [Z] [I] (2.1)
dx
dl
[—] = jco[C] [V] (2.2)
dx

Where [I] = Vector of phasor currents

[Z] = Series impedance matrix
[V] = Vector of phasor voltages measured phase to ground

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 I iy
} NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR
\
2.8M
I
R Q

2.8M ° 4k

2.8M

4M
•T 15. 9M
F I
C
18 4M
13. 4 M 1

r >r 1 1.
Figure 2.1 A Three-Phase, 4 Wire Overhead Transmission Line

where the self impedance (Zjj) and the mutual impedance (Z;k) are:

— + AXii) (2.3)

(2.4)

where the complex depth pp is:

(2.5)

R = Resistance of the conductor, Ohms/km

h = Average height of the conductor above the ground, m
dik = Distance between conductor i and k, m (see Figure 2.2)
Dik = Distance between conductor i and image conductor k, m
GMR = Geometric mean radius of conductor i, cm
x = Horizontal distance between conductors, m
(0 = Angular frequency, Radians/s
AR = Carson's correction term for resistance due to ground return effects

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 dik

Figure 2.2 Distances Between Conductors i and k

AX = Carson's correction term for reactance due to ground return effects

p = Resistivity of the soil, Ohm-m
Uo = Permeability of free space, H/m

The earth affects the capacitance of the conductor since its presence alters the
electric field of the conductor. In charging a conductor above the earth, there is a
potential difference between the conductor and the earth. In order to calculate the
capacitance of the conductor to earth, a fictitious conductor is assumed below the
earth's surface at a distance equal to twice the distance of the conductor above the
ground. Now if the earth is removed, the midpoint provides an equi-potential
surface. The fictitious conductor has a charge equal in magnitude and opposite in
sign to that of the original conductor and is called the image conductor.

The perfect earth behaves as a conductor. But in the presence of multiple

conductors, due to higher harmonic frequencies and higher earth resistivity values,
the effective resistance and the reactance increases. The increased values are
calculated using Carson's equations. Carson's correction terms AR and AX account
for the earth return effect and are functions of the angle cp (q> = 0 for self impedance
and (p = cpik in Figure 2.2 for mutual impedance) and of the parameter a:

a— (2.6)

with D = 2 h; in meter for self impedance

= 2 Dik in meter for mutual impedance

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 For a < 5, the correction factors are given in Reference [1]. For a > 5 the following
finite series is used:
(Cos</> VJ Cos 26 Cos3^ 3Cos5d 45Cos7<z5 V^IO" 7
AR = --- -, + - — + - —- - -- - ^— Q/km
a2 a
3
a
5
a
7 A/2 J
(2.7;
Cos^ Cos3^ t 3("os50 45Cos7^ 1 4fe>io" "l/Vrv! /I O\
— -^3— -5— -— ~7
v a a a y *v z

The trigonometric functions in the above equations can be calculated directly

from the geometry of the tower-conductor configuration using the following
relations:

hj + hk . xik
Cos (p - - c Sin (p — - (2.9)
Dik Dik
The above procedure can be extended for multi circuit lines. Carson's equations
for the homogeneous earth are normally accurate enough for power system studies.

Shunt capacitance - The capacitance between the phase conductor and the
ground can be calculated knowing Maxwell's potential coefficients. Maxwell's
potential coefficients [P] and the voltage [V] are given by:

[V] = [P][Q] (2.10)

where Q is the charge per unit length of the conductor. The diagonal elements PJJ
and the off-diagonal elements are calculated using the following equations:

1 2 hi
Pii= - In—^ (2.11)
27tsO ri

— (2.12)
dik

where 80 is the permittivity of free space. Knowing Maxwell's potential

coefficients, the capacitance matrix can be calculated using the relation
[C] — [P] '. In the capacitance matrix, the off-diagonal elements Cik — CRJ.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Elimination of ground effects - The ground effects can be included in the phase
conductors. Assume equation (2.1) has the following form:

V Zll Z12 I
(2.13)
Vc Z21 Z22

where V and Vg are system voltage and ground conductor voltages respectively.
Since Vg = 0, then:

dV
(2.14)
dx

(2.15)

Solving the above two equations:

dV i
=(Z11 -Zl2Z 2 2 Z2l)I (2.16)
dx

For the capacitance calculations, the same type of approach can be used. The
impedance components calculated using the above approach accounts for the
ground conductor effects.

Effective self and mutual impedance - If the self (Zjj) and mutual impedances
(Zik) of the individual conductors are known, then the effective self and mutual
impedance of the phases can be expressed as:

Zs Zm Zm

Zeq Zm Zs Zm (2.17)

Zm Zm Zs

(2.18)

(2.19)

The self and mutual capacitance are given by:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 (2.20)

(2.21)

Symmetrical component impedance - If the self (Zs) and mutual impedances

(Zm) of the phases are known, then the symmetrical components of the
impedances can be evaluated using the symmetrical component transformation:
1 1 1

s =• ' a2 (2.22)

where a = e1 * and a2 = e"j27t 3. Using the above transformation, equation 2.1 can
be transformed to provide the symmetrical component relation given by:

dV
~ (2.23)

Zpositive ~ Znegative (2.24)

Zzero ~ (Zs (2.25)

The symmetrical component capacitance is:

_1
Cpositive ~ Cnegative (Cs" Cm) (2.26)

Czero ~ (Cs+ 2 Cm) (2.27)

Typical line parameters - The calculated line parameters can be verified with
the typical parameters available from the literature. Such parameters are available
from system analysts working on the line design and calculations. Some typical
parameters are listed in Table 2.1.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 2.1 Typical Line Parameters

Parameter 66 kV 115 kV 138 kV 230 KV 345 kV 500 kV 750 kV

Ri, Ohm/mile 0.340 0.224 0.194 0.107 0.064 0.020 0.020

xi, Ohm/mile 0.783 0.759 0.771 0.785 0.509 0.338 0.528

RO, Ohm/mile 1.220 0.755 0.586 0.576 0.416 0.275 0.500

xo, Ohm/mile 2.370 2.300 2.480 2.235 1.624 1.050 1.584

Xo/Ro 1.950 3.050 4.230 4.080 3.490 3.800 3.170

C1, MFD/mile 0.014 0.015 0.014 0.014 0.019 0.013 0.020

CO, MFD/mile 0.009 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.012 0.009 0.013

Data for parameter calculations - The required data for the calculation of the
line parameters include the conductor details and tower configuration as listed
below.

• Resistance for phase and neutral conductors.

• Diameter for the phase and neutral conductors.
• Horizontal position of the conductor in the tower.
• Vertical position of the conductor in the tower.
• Sag of the conductor in the mid span.

The necessary conductor data is usually available from the manufacturers and
typical values for the following types are presented in Tables A-l through A-8.

Table; Description
A-l High Strength (HS) steel conductor.
A-2 Extra High Strength (EHS) steel conductor.
A-3 Aluminum Conductor Alloy Reinforced (ACAR).
A-4 Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR).
A-5 Aluminum Weld Conductor (ALUMOWE).
A-6 All Aluminum Conductor (AAC).
A-7 All Aluminum Alloy Conductor (AAAC).
A-8 Copper Conductors.

The required tower configuration data has to be from the specific installation.
Typical tower configurations are available from various books and
manufacturer's catalog.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Example parameter calculations — There are several programs available to
perform the line parameter calculations and the Electromagnetic Transients
Program (EMTP)-based overhead line parameters program is used [3] in the
example calculations. The typical input data and the calculated parameters are
discussed for the two-pole high voltage dc circuit, two phase traction circuit,
three-phase 230 kV ac circuit and three-phase 230 kV double circuit. The above
examples are chosen to demonstrate the different levels of complexities involved
in various line parameter calculations.

Example 2.1 - A typical two-pole high voltage dc circuit is shown in Figure 2.3.
The conductor and tower configurations are:

Description Phase Conductor Neutral Conductor

Type of conductor ACSR 500 kcmil 3/8 EHS
Resistance, Ohm/km 0.0249 1.9375
Diameter, cm 4.5771 1.2573
Conductor sag, m 10 9
The horizontal and vertical position of the conductor is shown in Figure 2.3. The
calculated line parameters are:

Self and Munial Components Symmetrical Components

Cs = 8.0017 nF/km C0 - 7.0238 nF/km
Cm =0.9778 nF/km C, - 8.9795 nF/km
Rs -0.1139 Ohm/km R0 = 0.1995 Ohm/km
Xs = 0.7875 Ohm/km X0 = 1.0836 Ohm/km
Rm = 0.0856 Ohm/km R, = 0.0282 Ohm/km
Xm =0.2961 Ohm/km Xj = 0.4914 Ohm/km
Surge Impedances
ZZero -645 Ohm Zpositive =381 Ohm

Example 2.2 - Consider a 230 kV, three-phase, four-conductor ac circuit is

shown in Figure 2.1. The conductor and tower configurations are:

Description Phase Conductor Neutral Conductor

Type of conductor 741 kcmil, AAAC 5/16 EHS
Resistance, Ohm/km 0.1010 9.32
Diameter, cm 2.5146 0.7925
Conductor sag, m 10 9

The input parameters for the calculation of the line constants using the
electromagnetic program are presented in List 2.1.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Neutral Conductor
6.1 M
I
B

41 M

21 M

Figure 2.3 Two Pole DC Tower Configuration for Example 2.1

List 2.1 Input Data for Line Constants Program (Edited Version)
(Courtesy of H. W. Dommel, Output from Overhead Line Parameters Program)

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H)

1 0.5 0.01 4 2.515 0 15.9 11.8
2 0.5 0.01 4 2.515 5.6 18.4 14.3
3 0.5 0.01 4 2.515 5.6 13.4 9.25
0 0.32 4 0.7925 2.82 23.4 19.4

(A) - Phase numbers for A, B, C

(B) - Skin effect factor
(C) - Resistance, Ohms/km
(D) - Reactance factor
(E) - Diameter, Cm
(F) - Conductor X coordinate, m
(G) - Conductor Y coordinate, m
(H) - Conductor Y coordinate with sag, m
The program output listing contains the data for various types of line parameters
such as conductor impedance, conductor equivalent impedance, symmetrical
component parameters and surge impedance parameters. Also, the capacitance
components include the line capacitance, conductor equivalent capacitance and
symmetrical component parameters. An edited version of the program output is
presented in List 2.2.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 List 2.2 Output of Line Constants Program (Edited Version)
(Courtesy of H. W. Dommel, Output from Overhead Line Parameters Program)

Capacitance, F/km: Equivalent Phase Conductors

1 7.87E-09=Cs

2 1.14E-09 7.92E-09

3 1.078744E-0 1.37E-09 8.07E-09

Capacitance, F/km; Symmetrical Components

0 5.56E-09=CO
O.OOE+00

1 4.281430E-1 2.13E-10
5.98E-11 3.78E-12
=C1
2 4.28E-11 9.15E-09 -2.13E-10
5.98E-11 1.31E-25 -3.78E-12

Impedance, Ohm/km; Equivalent Phase Conductors

1 8.12E-02=Rs
7.28E-01 = X s

2 6.67E-02 8.51E-02
2.40E-01 7.11E-01

3 6.34E-02 6.51E-02 7.85E-02

2.55E-01 2.62E-01 7.41E-01

Impedance, Ohm/km; Symmetrical Components

0 2.12E-01 = R O
1.23E+00 = X O

1 1.287834E-0 3.53E-04
1.21E-03 1.04E-02
=R1
2 1.33E-02 1.65E-02 -2.69E-05
6.85E-03 4.75E-01 1.05E-02

The horizontal and vertical position of the conductor is shown in Figure 2.1. The
calculated line parameters are:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Self and Mutual Components Symmetrical Components
Cs = 7.8671 nF/km Co = 5.5593 nF/km
Cm = 1.1434 nF/km C, =9.1483 nF/km
Rs =0.0812 Ohm/km Ro =0.2117 Ohm/km
Xs = 0.7282 Ohm/km X0 =1.2907 Ohm/km
Rm = 0.0667 Ohm/km R, =0.0165 Ohm/km
Xm = 0.2395 Ohm/km X, = 0.4745 Ohm/km
Surge Impedances
ZZero = 882 Ohm Znositive =377 Ohm

Example 2.3 - Consider a three-phase 230 kV double circuit with four

conductors (three phase conductors and one ground conductor) per circuit as
shown in Figure 2.4. The conductor and tower configurations are:

Description Phase Conductor Neutral Conductor

Type of conductor 741kcmil, AAAC 5/16 EHS
Resistance, Ohm/km 0.1010 9.32
Diameter, mm 25.146 7.925
Conductor sag, m 10 9

The horizontal and vertical position of the conductor is shown in Figure 2.4.

3.85M

>k *
6
4.1M
_ A
| I
OO A k
5.3M
O'o B o'o-r-
4.4M A

o'o c 31 3M
36
-Jk°'°C I
26. 3M
I I
22 M

>f w w >f ^

Figure 2.4 Three-Phase Double Circuit, Tower Configuration for Example 2.3

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The calculated line parameters are:

Self and Mutual Components Symmetrical Components

Cs = 7.9537 nF/km Co =5.9760 nF/km
Cm =1.1986 nF/km C, = 9.6687 nF/km
Coo -2.1204 nF/km
Rs =0.1721 Ohm/km Ro = 0.3447 Ohm/km
Xs = 0.8539 Ohm/km X0 = 1.4113 Ohm/km
Rm = 0.0699 Ohm/km Ri = 0.0767 Ohm/km
Xm = 0.3734 Ohm/km X, = 0.4592 Ohm/km
Roo =0.2717 Ohm/km
Xoo = 0.8649 Ohm/km
Surge Impedances
Z2ero = 803 Ohm 7
^positiv = 357 Ohm

2.2 IMPEDANCE OF UNDERGROUND CABLES

An increasing number of urban distribution networks use underground cables for

transmission and distribution systems. Performance evaluations and fault
calculations for such circuits require the data of sequence parameters. Typically,
these cables are shielded type and are laid in triangular configuration (Figure 2.5) or
in a horizontal configuration (Figure 2.6). The triplexed three cables are similar to
the one shown in Figure 2.5. In order to derive the parameters of the cable circuits,
consider the three-phase cable circuit shown in Figure 2.6.

A2

Figure 2.5 Cables in Triangular Configuration

(Al, A2 and A3 are distances between cables A, B and C)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 A3

A1 A2

Figure 2.6 Cables in Horizontal Configuration

(Al, A2 and A3 are distances between cables A, B and C)

There are other configurations for laying the cables in the conduit or pipes. Each
configuration has advantages and disadvantages. However, the impedance
calculation procedure is the same. For discussions on the cable applications, see
Reference [4]. For a three-phase circuit with shielded cables, the symmetrical
component parameters can be calculated as follows.

Self impedance of the phase conductor (Zaa) in Ohms/ 1000 feet:

Zaa = Ra + 0.0181 + j0.037?[4.681 +0.6101ogee( -—^- (228)

GMRa

Mutual impedance of the phase conductor (Zab) in Ohms/1000 feet:

1.55 Jp~ x -I
Zab = 0.0181 + j0.0377[ 4.681 +0.6101oge(l (2.29)
* GMD J J

Self impedance of the neutral conductor (Znn) in Ohms/ 1000 feet:

Rn
Rnn - [ - + 0.0181] (2.30)

5.24
Xnn = 0.0377 [4.681 + 0.610J loge (0.1 29<Jp~) + 0.6 10 log

1
GMRn Kn GMRC

Znn = (Rnn + j Xnn) Ohms/1000 feet (2.32)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Mutual impedance of the ground conductor (Zan) in Ohms/1000 feet:

1.55VP
V
= 0.0181 + j0.037?[ 4.68+ 0.6101oge{ } ] (2.33)
3 2
'GMR C GMD

Positive sequence (Zl) and zero sequence (ZO):

Z2
Zj = [Zaa -Z ab -- — JOhms/lOOOfeet (2.34)

->£-> an
ZQ =[Z a a +2Z a b -- ] Ohms/1 000 feet (2.35)

Where

GMR — Geometric mean radius of the phase conductor, inches

GMRs = Radius from the center of phase conductor to shield, inches
N = Number of shield neutral wires
Ra = Resistance of the phase conductor, Ohms/1000 feet
Rn = Resistance of the neutral conductor, Ohms/ 1000 feet
Al, A2, A3 - Distance between three phase cables, inches
GMD = ^/Al x A2 x A3 = Geometric mean distance, inches
Kn = Spacing factor of concentric neutral wires
p = Resistivity of earth, Ohm-m

Example 2.4 - Calculate the positive and zero sequence impedance of three 115
kV cables laid horizontally with a spacing of 8 inches. The sheaths are solidly
grounded at both ends of the cable. The cable is a 750 kcmil compact round
aluminum conductor with a 0.10 inch thick lead sheath. The resistance of the
conductor is 23 (a-Ohm/feet and the resistance of the sheath is 142 u-Ohm/feet.
The resistivity of earth is 100 Ohm-m. The thickness of the insulation is 0.85
inch. The geometric mean radius of the conductor is 0.445 inch. Also, calculate
the positive and zero sequence impedances using the EMTP program. Compare
the results. Calculate the charging capacitance values.

The geometric mean distance between the conductors GMD is:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 GMD = ^8 x 8 x 10 = 10.079 inch
Self impedance of the phase conductor (Zaa) per equation (2.28) is:

Zaa = (0.0483 + j 0.2615) Ohms/1000 feet

Mutual impedance of the phase conductor (Zab) per equation (2.29) is:

Zab = (0.0181 + j 0.1863) Ohms/1000 feet

Self impedance of the neutral conductor (Znn) per equation (2.32) is:

Znn = (0.0181 + j 0.2323) Ohms/1000 feet

Mutual impedance of the ground conductor (Zmg) per equation (2.33) is:

Zan = (0.1681 + j 0.2323) Ohms/1000 feet

The positive sequence (Zl) impedance per equation (2.34) is:

Zl = (0.0431 + j 0.0712) Ohms/1000 feet

The zero sequence impedance per equation (2.35) is:

ZO - (0.1689 + j 0.0625) Ohms/1000 feet

PROBLEMS (In each case, the resistivity of earth is 100 Ohm-meter).

1. Consider the double circuit line shown in Example 2.3 (also see Figure 2.4).
The line is to be operated at 138 kV with the same conductor positions.
Calculate the line parameters of the 138 kV in Ohms and in P.U. The phase
conductor is 550 kcmil from Table A-6. The neutral conductor is 3/8 HS
from Table A-l. Compare the calculated values with the typical values.

2. The configurations of the tower and the conductors of a 66 kV three-phase

single circuit line is similar to the one shown in Figure 2.1. The length of the
conductor arm is 8 feet. The vertical height of the phase conductors A, B and
C are 40 feet, 54 feet and 38 feet respectively. The height of the neutral
conductor is 62 feet. The phase conductor is 600 kcmil, ACSR. The neutral
conductor is 7.6 EHS. The span length between the towers is 200 feet.
Estimate the line parameters in the phase quantities and symmetrical
components both in Ohms and in P.U. Compare the values with the typical
values.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 3. Why are EHS conductors used for the neutral circuit? Why are the ACSR,
AAAR, ACAR and copper conductors used for the neutral circuit? What are
the primary conductor materials for the overhead system? Which conductor
is used and what are the factors involved in the selection?

4. Compare the properties of the neutral conductor of the overhead system and
the sheath used in the underground cable system.

5. Calculate the positive and zero sequence impedance of a 115 kV XLPE

cable installed in a triangular configuration with a spacing of 10 inches
between the centers of the cables. The sheaths are solidly grounded at both
ends of the cable. The cable is a 1000 kcmil, compact round aluminum
conductor and the thickness of the sheath is 0.100 inch. The conductor
resistance is 0.225 micro-ohm/feet. The resistance of the sheath is 141
micro-ohm/feet. The thickness of the insulation is 0.84 inch. The diameter of
the conductor is 1.06 inch. Also, represent the cable conductors like
overhead conductors and calculate the symmetrical component parameters
using the electromagnetic transients program. Compare the values.

6. The symmetrical component impedances of a 138 kV circuits are:

Zl = (0.0928 + j 0.431) P.U.

ZO = (0.699 +j 0.843) P.U.
Charging MVAR =0.2113 P.U. on 100 MVA base.

Calculate the self and mutual impedances in Ohms. Also, calculate the self
and mutual charging capacitance in microfarad.

REFERENCES

1. H. W. Dommel, EMTP Theory Book, Prepared for Bonneville Power

Administration, Portland, Oregon, 1986.

2. J. Grainger, W. Stevenson, Jr., Power System Analysis, McGraw-Hill

Book Companies, New York, 1994.

3. H. W. Dommel, Overhead Line Parameters Program, University of

British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1980.

4. ANSI/IEEE Standard 141, IEEE Recommended Practice for Electric

Power Distribution for Industrial Plants, IEEE Press, 1993 (Red Book).

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 3
POWER FLOW ANALYSIS

3.1 INTRODUCTION

The bulk electrical power is generated by three main methods: hydro sources, coal
fired stations and nuclear generating stations. Isolated power supplies are obtained
from diesel engine driven generators, wind electric generators, solar panels and
batteries. The bulk power is generated at 4.16 kV, 13.8 kV, 18 kV or 22 kV and is
stepped up to high voltages for transmission. The load centers are usually located
away from generating stations. Therefore, the power is transmitted to the load
centers and is stepped down to distribution level. The load is supplied at various
voltage levels. The load may be residential, industrial or commercial. Depending on
the requirement the loads are switched on and off. Therefore, there are peak load
hours and off peak load hours. When there is a need, power is transmitted from one
area to the other area through the tie lines. The control of generation, transmission,
distribution and area exchange are performed from a centralized location. In order
to perform the control functions satisfactorily, the steady state power flow must be
known. Therefore, the entire system is modeled as electric networks and a solution
is simulated using a digital program. Such a problem solution practice is called
power flow analysis.

The power flow solution is used to evaluate the bus voltage, branch current, real
power flow, reactive power flow for the specified generation and load conditions.
The results are used to evaluate the line or transformer loading and the acceptability
of bus voltages. In general the power flow solutions are needed for the system under
the following conditions:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • Various systems loading conditions (peak and off peak).
• With certain equipment outaged.
• Addition of new generators.
• Addition of new transmission lines or cables.
• Interconnection with other systems.
• Load growth studies.
• Loss of line evaluation.

In order to solve for the power flow solutions, it is necessary to model all the
networks, generators, transformers and shunt capacitors. The approach to the
modeling and the analysis of large-scale power flow solutions are presented in this
Chapter. Some related definitions are given below.

Area - A section of a large power system or the power system of one power
company.

Bulk power system - An interconnected power system with many generators,

transmission lines and substations on which a disturbance or fault can have
influence outside of the local area.

Contingency - An event involving the loss of one or more elements (such as a line,
transformer, circuit breaker or generator), which affects the power system.

Normal fault-clearing - A fault-clearing consistent with the correct operation of

the protective relay scheme and with the correct operation of all the circuit breakers
followed by a fault.

Delayed or backup fault-clearing - A fault-clearing consistent with the correct

operation circuit breaker failure scheme and its associated breakers, or of a backup
relay scheme with an intentional time delay.

3.2 THE POWER FLOW PROBLEM

The formulation of the power flow problem can be shown using a three-bus
example shown in Figure 3.1. Let the bus voltages be VI, V2 and V3. The currents
injected at the three nodes are II, 12 and 13. The line admittance values are Ya, Yb
and Yc respectively. The shunt admittance at the bus locations are Yl, Y2 and Y3
respectively. The power flow problem is to solve for the bus voltages, branch
currents, and real and reactive power flows through various branches. The relation
between the bus voltages [V] and the branch currents [I] are given by [1]:

[V] =[Z][I] (3.1)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Where [Z] is the bus impedance matrix of the network. Since the bus voltages are
known, the branch currents can be calculated using the relation:

[I] =[Y][V] (3.2)

VI V3
Ya
II 13
12 ^
V2

Yb Yc
—1 1
Yl [

Figure 3.1 One Line Diagram of the Three Bus System

Where [ Y] is the bus admittance matrix of the system, which can be set up from the
power system network. The matrix equations are to be solved for the variables. In
order to simplify the solution approach, the solution variables are described by the
following four quantities.

P = Real power
Q = Reactive power
V = Magnitude of the bus voltage
u = Angle of the bus voltage
Then, the current is expressed as:

(P-JQ) +J5
-e J (3.3)
V
To solve the power flow equations, two of the four variables must be known at each
bus. The following three type of buses are defined.

Load bus (Type 1) - In a load bus, the real power (P) and the reactive power (Q)
are known. The variables V and o are not specified.

Generator bus (Type 2) - In a generator bus, the voltage (V) is kept constant and
the output power (P) is fixed. These two items are controlled by the excitation
system and the governor. The unknown variables are Q and O .

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Swing bus (Type 3) - At the reference generator or swing bus, the voltage (V) and
the load angle ( § ) are known. The unknown variables are P and Q.

The known and the variables to be solved at various buses are:

Type Bus P Q Y_ 5_
1 Load bus Known Known Solve Solve
2 Generator bus Known Solve Known Solve
3 Swing bus Solve Solve Known Known

The objective of the power flow study is to evaluate the two quantities at each bus
that is not specified. The equation 3.2 is a set of linear equations. Introduction of P
and Q produces a set of nonlinear complex equations. Therefore, the solution
approach is by the iteration method.

Formulation of the [Y] Matrix - The admittance matrix [Y] is required to solve
the equation 3.2. The formulation of the admittance matrix is shown by using an
example in Figure 3.1. The Y's are admittance of various branches or shunts, V's are
the voltages and Fs are currents. The equations are written as:

11 = (Ya + Yb + Yl) VI - Yb V2 - Ya V3 (3.4)

12 = -Yb VI + (Yb + Yc + Y2) V2 - Yc V3 (3.5)

13 = -Ya VI - Yc V2 + (Yc + Ya + Y3) V3 (3.6)

Where Vi's are the node voltages (i = 1,2, 3). The above three equations can be
written in matrix form as:

Ya + Y b + Y l -Yb - Ya VI
-Yb Yb+Yc + Y2 - Yc V2 (3.7)
-Ya -Yc Yc + Ya + Y3 V3

The [Y] matrix is symmetrical and the diagonal elements contain the admittance of
all the branches connected to the node. The off diagonal admittance element is due
to the outgoing branch to the k-th node. This procedure is easy to implement
through a computer program to form the [Y] matrix for the given network. By
solving the equation 3.7, the branch currents can be evaluated.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 3.3 THE SOLUTION APPROACH

The load flow problem is complex, since all the quantities (V, I, kVA, and Z) are
complex numbers. Further, the known and the unknown variables are not the same
in all the equations. Therefore, there is a need to adjust these equations accordingly.
The introduction of (P + jQ) in these equations introduce nonlinearity, making the
solution approach difficult. The basic solution approaches are illustrated using a
three-bus problem. In order to make the solution approach simplified, the resistance
and the shunt capacitance are neglected. Consider a three-bus problem as shown in
Figure 3.2. Bus 1 is the swing bus with voltage magnitude and the angle specified.
Bus 2 is a generator bus with P specified. Bus 3 is a load bus with P and Q
specified. Voltages V2 and V3 are to be obtained by the solution. The system
equations are written for bus 2 and bus 3 as:

12 = Y21 VI + Y22 V2 + Y23 V3 (3.8)

12 = P2/V2 (3.9)

Combining equations (3.8) and (3.9):

V 2 = — V 2 - (Y21V1-Y23V3) (3.10)
Y22V

The equation contains V2 on both sides and hence can be solved only by iteration
techniques. Substituting the known parameters, equation (3.10) can be rewritten as:

V2 =
— — + 5 + 10V3 (3.11)

In a similar manner the equation for V3 can be written as:

V3 = — — + 10 + 10V2 (3.12)
201V3 )
V1 = 1.0PU V2
= 5PU
PI P2= 1.1 PU
V3

Y = 1 0 PU 4_ Y=10PU
P3 = -1.3PU

Figure 3.2 Three Bus Example

There are several approaches to solve these equations. The solution approaches are
shown using the three-bus example.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Gauss Iteration Method - By this method, the unknowns V2 and V3 are assigned
with estimated values. Note that the bus voltages are always around 1.0 P.U.
Compute the value of V2 and V3 using the initial estimates of V2 and V3. Repeat
the procedure until a solution is reached. Each complete computation of V2 and V3
is called on iteration. The first iteration for the equations (3.11) and (3.12) using
V2 = V3 = 1.0P.U. gives:

V2 = — l + 5 + 10(1.0) = 1.0733P.U. (3.13)

V3 = — ( — + 10 + 10(1.0) | = 0.9350P.U. (314)

20V 1.0 '

The equation for the nth iteration is given by:

V2 (n) = - -
15^V2(n-l)

(n) _ i f -1.3
V3

The calculated voltages are said to converge, if the voltage values get closer and
closer to the actual solution. The criterion satisfying the desirable accuracy is called
the convergence criterion. Comparing the calculated voltage and the previous bus
voltage can perform a voltage check. If the difference is within the specified limits,
then the power flow solution can be accepted.

V' = (V n -'-V n ) < Vtolerance (3.17)

An example voltage tolerance can be 0.0001 P.U. The voltage V2 and V3 during
the iteration procedure using the Gauss approach is shown in Table 3.1.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 3.1 Voltages V2 and V3 During the Gauss Iteration

Iteration V2 V3
1 1.0733 0.9350
2 1.0312 0.9618
3 1.0521 0.9428
4 1.0379 0.9518
5 1.0450 0.9454
7 1.0402 0.9484
8 1.0425 0.9463
9 1.0409 0.9473
10 1.0417 0.9466
11 1.0412 0.9469

The Gauss solution converges slowly. Other acceptance criteria for large-scale
power flow problems are the calculation and comparison of real power for all the
buses. The difference in the power between iteration n and (n-1) is called the
mismatch power and if this quantity is within specified limits (generally in the range
of 0.01 to 0.001 P.U.), then the solution is acceptable.

Pmismatch = ^P'"' - ZP<""" (3.18)

Gauss-Seidel Iteration Method - In this method, the unknowns V2 and V3 are

assigned with estimated values. Then compute the value of V2 using the initial
estimates of V2 and V3. Compute the value of V3 using the initial estimate of V3
and just calculated value of V2. Repeat the procedure until a solution is reached.
The first iteration for the equations (3.19) and (3.20) yields:

1/1.1 x
V2 = — ( + 5 + 10(1.0) ) =1.0733P.U (3 19)
15 1.0

1 / -1.3 v
V3 = —( + 10 + 10(1.0733) ) =0.9717P.U (320)
20 i.o

Table 3.2 shows the calculated bus voltages using the Gauss-Seidel iteration
method.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 3.2 Voltages V2 and V3 During the Gauss-Seidel Iteration

Iteration V2 V3
1 1.0733 0.9717
2 1.0556 0.9558
3 1.0463 0.9499
4 1.0431 0.9478
5 1.0419 0.9471
7 1.0415 0.9469
8 1.0414 0.9468
9 1.0413 0.9467

It can be seen that this solution approach converges faster than the Gauss method,
since the updated values are used in each iteration.

The Newton-Raphson method - A faster solution is obtained using the Newton-

Raphson method and is suitable for large-scale problems. In this approach, the
partial derivatives are used to construct the Jacobian matrix. For the three-bus
problem, the bus power relations are given by:

P 1 = V 1 ( Y 1 1 V 1 + Y 1 2 V 2 + Y13 V3)
P2 = V2 (Y21 VI + Y22 V2 + Y23 V3) (3.21)
P3 = V3 (Y31 VI + Y32 V2 + Y33 V3)

The elements of the Jacobian matrix based on equation (3.21) are:

API ~3P1 3P1 3P1 AVI

3V 1 3V2 3V3
3P2 3P2 3P2
AP2 = AV2 (3.22)
3V 1 3V2
3P3 3P3
AP3 3V 1 3V2 AV3

The equation (3.22) can be written as:

[AP] = [j] [AV] (3.23)

where [J] is the Jacobian matrix. For the three bus power flow problem, the voltage
of the swing generator is specified as VI = 1.0 P.U. and is constant. Therefore,
AV 1 = 0 and therefore, the equation (3.22) reduces to:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 AP2~ ~dP2 dP2 AV2~
5V 1 aV2
= (3.24)
dP3 5P3
AP3 AV3
_5V1 aV2

The changes in V2 and V3 can be calculated by iterative method, by assuming

suitable starting values for V2 and V3 as 1.0 P.U. The equation to the computation
can be presented as:

AV2 V2 -1 AP2
-[J] (3.25)
AV3 V3 AP3

This is the basic equation for the calculation of the Newton-Raphson method. For
the three-bus system, the derivatives for the Jacobian matrix are calculated as:

= Y21V1 + 2Y22V2 + Y23V3 (3.26)

SV2

8P2
- Y23V2 (3.27)
dV3

8P3
= Y32V3 (3.28)
dV2

dP3
= Y31V1 + Y32V2 + 2Y33V3 (3.29)
dV3

Using the V2 = V3 = 1.0 and the admittance values for the branches, the Jacobian
matrix and the inverse are obtained as:

10 10 0.2 0.2
W= 10 15
and
0.2 0.3

AP2 = 1.0(-5 -15 + 10) -1.1 = -1.1

AP3 = 1.0(-10- 10 + 20) +1.3 =1.3

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 V2 1.0 0.2 0 . 2 - 1 . 1 0.96
(3.30)
V3 1.0 0.2 0.3 1.3 0.87

Proceeding in the same way as outlined above the iteration procedure will give a
solution. The Newton-Raphson solution approach is much faster than the other
approaches.

The fast decoupled load flow - One of the main issues with the Newton-Raphson
method is the need for evaluating and inverting the Jacobian matrix. For an n bus
system, the size of the matrix is (2n-ng-2) , where ng is the number of generator
buses. Further, the Jacobian matrix must be recalculated and inverted for each
iteration. Therefore, there is a need for simplified approaches to solve the power
flow problem. A closer examination of the power flow problem will reveal the
following:

• P is sensitive to the load angle and relatively insensitive to the voltage.

• Q is sensitive to the voltage and relatively insensitive to the load angle.

Therefore, the full derivative equation can be decoupled into two equations as:

ap
AP = [—] M (3.31)
dS
dQ
AQ = -[—] AV (3.32)
av
Solving for A5 and AV:
ap .1
A£ = [—] AP (3.33)
d§
dQ 4
AV - -[—] 'AQ (3.34)
av
The sub matrix involved in equation (3.33) and (3.34) is only half the size of the
Jacobian matrix. Further approximations and rearrangements will create the
following equations:

A P - [Bp] A6 (3.35)

A Q = [Bq] AV (3.36)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The solution for the above equations are given by:

Ap (3.37)

AQ (3.38)

The array [Bp] and [Bq] has to be formulated and evaluated only once unless phase
shifting transformers are present in the system.

3.4 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

The power flow cases are generally classified as design cases, contingency cases
and extreme contingency cases. The definition of the individual case and the
acceptable performance under the given operating case has to be considered.

Base case - A base case is a design requirement case with all the equipment
operating within the normal ratings. This is applicable for peak and off peak load
conditions. The system voltage at all the buses will be within ± 5% [2]. But in
many cases a much lower margin may be specified by the utility. The base case
criteria are applicable for all the planning studies of the bulk power system.

Contingency case - A contingency case is a power flow case with one component
outage, followed by fault clearing. The fault may be any one of the following:

• Loss of one component without a fault.

• A permanent three-phase fault on any bus section, any one generator,
transmission line or transformer cleared in normal fault clearing time.
• A permanent three-phase fault on a circuit breaker, cleared in normal fault
clearing time.
• Simultaneous phase to ground faults on different phases of each of two double
circuits installed on a double circuit tower, cleared in normal fault clearing
time. Some utilities consider this a multiple contingency case.
• A permanent three-phase to ground fault on any bus section, any generator,
transmission line or transformer with delayed fault clearing.

Contingency cases must have all lines loaded within short-term emergency ratings
and all other equipment loaded with long term emergency ratings. Allowable system
voltages are within a range of 0.95 P.U. to 1.05 P.U. It is expected that within 15
minutes all line and cable loading can be reduced to within the long term emergency
ratings by adjustment of phase shifting transformers and/or re-dispatch of
generation. Sometimes, a contingency analysis is performed using the entire system.
Then, the following types of cases are found in the results.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Acceptable cases - These are power flow cases, without any overloaded branches
or undervoltage or overvoltage buses.

Cases with overloaded lines - If there are overloaded lines or transformers, then
the line overloading can be brought to the normal ratings using transformer tap
changing or other control actions. The normal rating has to be achieved in 15
minutes (if the overload exceeds the STE rating) or in 30 minutes if the overload is
within LTE rating.

Cases with overvoltage or undervoltage - If there are overvoltage or undervoltage

buses, then the bus voltages can be brought to the normal values using transformer
tap changing or other control actions.

Cases with overloads lines and voltage deviated buses - Actions required as
above.

Not converged cases - The power flow solution is not converged for the given
contingency case.

Islanded cases -During islanded operation, the system parts into two or more
sections and each section may tend to have overvoltage or undervoltage problems
depending on the amount of generation available in each section.

The not converged and the islanding cases are not acceptable. All the cases require
careful analysis in order to avoid any loss in the system performance.

Multiple contingency cases - Sometimes more than one fault occurs in a power
system due to a common cause (for example a lightning strike) or for other reasons.
Though the power systems are not designed for multiple contingencies, the power
system planners need to know the effect and remedial approaches for such events.
Some of the multiple contingencies are:

• Loss of an entire generating plant.

• Sudden dropping of a very large load.
• Loss of all lines from a generating station or substation.
• Loss of transmission lines on a common right of way.
• Three-phase fault on a bus section, generator or transmission line with delayed
clearing.

The effect of multiple contingencies may be line overloads, unacceptable bus

voltages, islanding or any other emergency condition. Therefore, planning studies
are always needed in this direction to understand the system behavior.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Steady state voltage requirements - The steady state voltage requirements are
defined by the ANSI standard C84.1 [2] and the summary is presented in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3 Steady State Voltage Limits

Nominal Voltage Maximum Voltage Minimum Voltage

kV kV kV

12.5 13.1 11.9

13.8 14.5 13.1
24.9 26.1 23.7
34.5 36.2 32.8
46.0 48.3 43.7
69.0 72.5 65.6
115 121 109
138 145 131
161 169 153
230 242 218
345 362 327
500 550 475

In case the voltage limit is not specified, it is a good practice to use a maximum and
minimum voltage of +5% and -5% of the nominal voltage respectively. In extra
high voltage systems, an upper voltage tolerance of+10% is often used.

Loading levels - The loading levels of transmission lines, cable circuits and
transformers are usually given as nominal ratings. In the case of emergency
conditions, the short term emergency rating (STE) and long-term emergency ratings
are used, which are defined below.

Nominal rating - The nominal rating is the continuous loading that causes rated
temperature at the specified ambient conditions. The nominal rating of a
transmission line is given by:
Line rating =>/3 (kV)(kA), MVA (3.39)

Short-term emergency rating (STE) - This is a 15 minute emergency rating. This

rating is higher than the nominal rating by a factor of 1.1 to 2.0 and is determined
by the operating utility.

Long-term emergency rating (LTE) - This is a 30 minute emergency rating. This

rating is higher than the nominal rating by a factor of 1.05 to 1.8 and is determined

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 by the operating utility. Some example ratings are shown in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4 Example of Nominal, LTE and STE Ratings

Voltage Nominal Rating LTE Rating STE Rating

Equipment kV MVA MVA MVA

Overhead line 500 1,000 1,100 1,200

Cable 345 550 650 900
Transformer 345/138 300 400 460

3.5 THE SYSTEM DATA

The system voltages encountered in the power flow problems vary from high
voltage to extra high voltage levels. In such complex problems, it is advantageous to
use per unit system to represent and solve the power flow problem. System studies
are usually performed using 100 MVA base. The voltage at each level is used as the
base voltage at that circuit. The required data are bus data, load data, generator data,
branch data, transformer data and area exchange data. The required data in each
category is outlined below [5].

Bus data - The bus data describes the bus location and the voltage in kV and per
unit.

• Bus number.
• Bus name.
• Bus type (swing bus or generator bus or load bus).
• Real part of the shunt admittance.
• Reactive part of the shunt admittance (reactive or capactive).
• Per unit voltage and angle.
• Bus voltage in kV.

The bus number and the bus name are used to keep track of the power flows and
current flow in various branches to the given bus.

Load data - The load data are used to represent the load at various bus locations.
Usually, the constant MVA load representation is used. Sometimes, the constant
current or constant impedance type of load model can be used. The load data
include:
• Bus number.
• Load identification number.
• Area number.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • Real power in MW.
• Reactive power in MVAR.

The load data are used in the programs in any one of the following load types.

• Constant impedance type where P = C V and Q = FV .

• Constant current load, where P = BV and Q = EV.
• Constant MVA load, where P = A and Q = D.

where the constants A through F are defined based on the nature of the load (such as
residential, industrial or agricultural).

Generator data - Through the generator data, the machine power capabilities are
expressed along with the MVA base. The arrangement of data is as follows:

• Bus number.
• Generator number.
• Generator power in MW.
• Maximum power of the generator in MW.
• Generator reactive power in MVAR.
• Maximum reactive power in MVAR.
• Minimum reactive power in MVAR.
• Generator resistance in P.U.
• Generator reactance in P.U.
• Base MVA of the generator.

Branch data - The branch data provide the line impedance and the line charging
data. The data consist of the following:

• From bus number.

• To bus number.
• Branch identification number.
• Line resistance in P.U. on 100 MVA base.
• Line reactance in P.U. on 100 MVA base.
• Line charging susceptance in P.U. on 100 MVA base.
• Line rating in MW.
• Line in or out identification code.

Transformer data - The transformer impedance is expressed along with the branch
data. However, the transformer tap changing data are expressed in this part as:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • From bus number.
• To bus number.
• Circuit number.
• Tap setting in P.U.
• Tap angle in degrees.
• Maximum tap position.
• Minimum tap position.
• Scheduled voltage range with tap size.

Area data - If the power flow data have several areas, then the required
identifications are provided as:

• Bus number.
• Number of the swing bus.
• Net exchange leaving the area in MW.
• Exchange tolerance in MW.

The presence of the dc lines and the switched shunt data require special
considerations. Once the raw data are entered in the required format, the program
using suitable commands can read the data. Then the power flow is solved and
the data are saved as a digital file. There are several formats for transporting or
presenting the load flow data file. The required data consist of solved load flow
cases for peak load conditions and off-peak conditions. Usually the data are
supplied in IEEE common data format specified in reference [5]. Also, the
various programs have the capability to convert from one format to the other.

3.6 EXAMPLE IEEE SIX BUS SYSTEM

Consider the IEEE six bus power flow case given in Reference [4]. A one-line
diagram of the system is shown in Figure 3.3. The system contains six buses, four
generators seven branches and five loads. The bus data, branch data and the
generator data are given below. The system data are prepared and the power flow
are solved using the PTI's PSS/E program [6].

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Bus3 Bus2

Bus4
Bus5
Gen4
- Load

Figure 3.3 One-Line Diagram of the IEEE Six Bus System

Bus Data
Bus Type G, P.U B.P.U. kV Voltage, PU
1 3 0 0 13.8 1.050
2 1 0 0 230 1.000
3 2 0 0 230 1.020
4 2 0 0 230 1.010
5 2 0 0 18 1.050
6 1 0 0 230 1.000

Branch Data
Bus I Bus J R, P.U X, P.U. B, P.U. Rating,MW
1 2 0.025 0.1682 0.259 175
2 3 0.0238 0.2108 0.3017 75
3 4 0.0328 0.1325 0.0325 75
4 5 0.1021 0.8957 0.2406 100
5 6 0.213 0.8957 0.2406 75
6 2 0.1494 0.3692 0.0412 75
6 3 0.1191 0.2704 0.0328 75

Generator Data

Bus Pg,min, MW Pgmax,MW Qgmin,MVAR Qgmax,MVAR MVAb

1 150 200 -138 138 150
3 30 63 0 98 30
4 50 70 -81 81 50
5 380 400 -110 226 380

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The calculated power flow solution using a program is presented in Table 3.5. The
solution report can be obtained from all the power flow programs. In the output of
the computed results, at each node the following results are presented:

• Generation, MW, MVAR, MVA, % loading, bus voltage in P.U.

• Load, MW, MVAR, MVA, % loading.

The calculated power flow results can be compared with the results of the six-bus
system provided in the reference [4].

Table 3.5 Output of the Power Flow Program (Edited Version)

(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc. Output from PSS/E Program)
IEEE 6 BUS SYSTEM
BASE CASE

BUS 1 BUS1 13.8 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA %I 1.0400PU 0.00

GENERATION 1 196.8 10.6R 197.0 99 14.352KV
TO 2 BUS2 13 .8 1 1 196 .8 10.6 197.0 108

BUS 2 BUS2 13.8 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA %I 1.0028PU -18.15

13.839KV
TO LOAD-PQ 56 . 3 56 .4
TO 1 BUS1 13.8 1 1 -187.7 189.1 108
TO 3 BUS3 13.8 1 1 84 . 9 88.6 50
TO 6 BUS6 13.8 1 1 46 .4 46.4 62

BUS 3 BUS 3 13 .8 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA 1.0200PU -28.36

GENERATION 1 53.0 43.. 1R 68.3 108 14.076KV
TO LOAD-PQ 170.0 9..0 170.2
TO 2 BUS 2 13 .8 1 1 -83 .2 9 .7 83.8 47
TO 4 BUS 4 13 .8 1 1 -44 .7 3 ..0 44.8 59
TO 6 BUS6 13 .8 1 1 10 . 9 21 ..4 24.1 31

BUS 4 BUS4 13 .8 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA %I 1.0300PU -25.05

GENERATION 1 60. 0 27.6R 66.0 94 14.214KV
TO LOAD-PQ 91.6 15.0 92 . 8
TO 3 BUS3 13 . 8 1 1 45.3 -3.8 45.5 59
TO 5 BUSS 13 .8 1 1 -76.9 16.4 78.7 76

BUS 5 BUSS 13 . 8 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA %I 0.9900PU .30

GENERATION 1 382 . 0 15.OR 382.3 96 13.662KV
TO LOAD-PQ 247.0 52.4 252.5
TO 4 BUS4 13 .8 1 1 84 .4 -30.9 89.9 91
TO 6 BUS 6 13 . 8 1 1 50 .6 -6.6 51.0 69

BUS 6 BUS6 AREA CKT MW MVAR MVA %I 0.9459PU -28.48

1 13.054KV
TO LOAD-PQ 98 .4 10..0 98 .9
TO 2 BUS2 1 1 -43 .2 5..2 43 .5 61
TO 3 BUS3 1 1 -10 .2 -22 ..9 25 .. 1 35
TO 5 BUSS 1 1 -45 .0 7.7 45..6 64

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 3.6 Output of the Contingency Analysis (Edited Version)
(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc. Output from PSS/E Program)
C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S
X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS BASE CASE
FROM NAME TO NAME CRT PRE-CNT POST-CNT RATING PERCENT
1*BUS1 13.8 2 BUS2 13.8 1 197.0 197.0 175.0 108.3
X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT
1
BUSES WITH VOLTAGE LESS THAN 0.9500: 6 BUS4 13.8 0.9459 0.9459

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 1
X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X
OPEN LINE FROM BUS 2 [BUS2 13.800] TO BUS 3 [BUS3 13.800] CIRCUIT 1
*** NOT CONVERGED ***

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 2
X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X FROM
OPEN LINE FROM BUS 5 [BUS5 13.800] TO BUS 6 [BUS6

13.800] CIRCUIT 1 CONTINGENCY OVRLOD 2

FROM NAME TO NAME CKT PRE-CNT POST-CNT RATING PERCENT
1*BUS1 13.8 2 BUS2 13.8 1 197.0 211.6 175.0 116.3
3 BUS3 13.8 4*BUS3 13.8 1 45.5 84.9 75.0 109.8
4 BUS4 13.8 5*BUS3 13.8 1 89.9 135.5 100.0 136.9
X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT
1
BUSES WITH VOLTAGE LESS THAN 0.9500: 6 BUS6 13.8 0.9090 0.9459

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 3
X MULTI - SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X FROM NAME
OPEN LINE FROM BUS 4 [BUS4 13.800] TO BUS 5 [BUS5 13.800] CIRCUIT
*** NOT CONVERGED ***

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 4
X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X
OPEN LINE FROM BUS 3 [BUSS 13.800] TO BUS 4 [BUS4 13.800]
*** NOT CONVERGED ***

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X-- O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 5
X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X
OPEN LINE FROM BUS 2 [BUS2 13.800] TO BUS 6 [BUS4 13.800] CIRCUIT 1
FROM NAME TO NAME CKT PRE-CNT POST-CNT RATING PERCENT
1*BUS1 13.8 2 BUS2 13.8 1 197.0 200.6 175.0 110.2

X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT

1
BUSES WITH VOLTAGE LESS THAN 0.9500: 6 BUS6 13.8 0.8956 0.9459

C O N T I N G E N C Y E V E N T S X - - O V E R L O A D E D L I N E S 6

X MULTI-SECTION LINE GROUPINGS X FROM

OPEN LINE FROM BUS 3 [BUS3 13.800] TO BUS 6 [BUS4 13.800] CIRCUIT 1
FROM NAME TO NAME CKT PRE-CNT POST-CNT RATING PERCENT
1 BUS1 13.8 2*BUS2 13.8 1 197.0 191.0 175.0 111.8

X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT X BUS X V-CONT V-INIT

' BUSES WITH VOLTAGE LESS THAN 0.9500: 6 BUS6 13.8 0.8143 0.9459

Contingency Analysis - An outage of one component in a power system is known

as a contingency and the system performance is expected to be normal. The
component can be a transmission line, transformer, a circuit breaker or a bus

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 section. There is a need to perform a power flow in every system to identify the
power flows under such condition. A contingency analysis is performed for the six-
bus system and the results are presented in Table 3.6. The following types of cases
are present in the results.

Acceptable cases - None.

Cases with overloaded lines - Base case.
Cases with overvoltage or undervoltage - None.
Cases with overloaded lines and voltage deviated buses - 2,5,6.
Not converged cases -1,3 and 4.
Islanded cases - None.

A multiple contingency analysis was not performed in this case, since the test
system itself is very small. In large-scale problems, it is necessary to perform such
an analysis.

3.7 CONCLUSIONS

The basis of the power flow problem suitable for the large-scale analysis is
presented in this Chapter. The approach to formulate the power flow problem, the
various solutions approaches, the acceptance criteria for the solutions and the
required data for the analysis are discussed. The IEEE six-bus power flow problem
is taken and the solution is presented along with discussions. For further analysis
and theory reference [7] is recommended.

PROBLEMS

1. What are the three type of buses used to define the power flow problem? Is it
possible to solve the power flow problem without such definitions?

2. What are the different approaches available for solving the power flow
problem? Compare the different techniques and select the most efficient
approach.

3. If there is only one source and the loads are connected to the power system
in a radial manner, is it still necessary to define the three types of buses and
the usual power flow solution approach? If not, how can you handle the
power system problem with only one source?

4. The IEEE 24 bus system data for the reliability test are available in
Reference [3]. Study the data and simulate the power flow and validate the
results.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 5. The IEEE nine bus system consists of nine buses, three generators, nine
branches and six loads. The data for the nine bus system are given below.
Draw the one-line diagram of the system for the given system.

Bus Data
Bus Type G, P.U B,P.U. kV Voltage, PU
1 2 0 0 16.5 .040
2 1 0 0 230 .000
3 1 0 0 230 .000
4 1 0 0 230 .000
5 2 0 0 18 .020
6 1 0 0 230 .000
7 1 0 0 230 .000
8 2 0 0 13.8 .020
9 1 0 0 230 .000

Branch data

Bus I Bus J R, P.U X, P.U. B, P.U.

1 2 0 0.0576 0
2 3 0.01 0.085 0.088
3 4 0.032 0.161 0.153
5 4 0 0.0625 0
4 6 0.0085 0.072 0.0745
6 7 0.0119 0.1008 0.1045
7 8 0 0.0586 0
7 9 0.039 0.17 0.179
9 2 0.017 0.092 0.079

Generator Data
Pg.min Pgmax Qg,min Qg.max
Bus MW MW MVAR MVAR MVAb Xd1
1 2 0 0 16.5 1.040 0.06
5 163 0 0 230 1.000 0.12
8 85 0 0 230 1.000 0.18

The power flow through various branches is given in the table below. Prepare the
power flow data and solve the power flow problem and compare the calculated
and the benchmark results.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Power flow results
Bus I BusJ P, MW Q , MVAR
1 2 72.90 49.90
2 3 41.40 33.70
3 4 86.30 10.00
5 4 163.00 37.80
4 6 76.50 9.50
6 7 24.00 22.90
7 8 85.80 15.70
7 9 60.90 1.90
9 2 30.90 17.90

REFERENCES

1. ANSI/IEEE Standard: 399, IEEE Re<

System Analysis, 1990 (Brown Book).

2. ANSI Standard C84.1, American National Standard Voltage Ratings for

Electric Power Systems and Equipment (60 Hz), 1982.

3. IEEE Subcommittee Report, "IEEE Reliability Test System," IEEE

Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-98, No.6,
November/December 1979, pp. 2047-2054 (for 24 bus data).

4. R. Billington and S. S. Sachdeva, "Real and Reactive Power Optimization

by Sub Optimal Techniques," IEEE PES Summer Meeting, Oregon, July
1971, Paper 71 Tp596-PWR (6 bus data).

5. Common Format for Exchange of Solved Load Flow Cases, IEEE

Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-92, No.6,
November/December 1973, pp. 1916-1925.

6. PSS/E Program, Power Technologies, Inc., Schenectady, New York.

7. J. Grainger and W. D. Stevenson, Jr., Power System Analysis, McGraw-

Hill Book Company, 1994.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 4
SHORT CIRCUIT STUDIES

4.1 INTRODUCTION

In a power system short circuits occur once in a while due to lightning, flash over
due to polluted insulation, falling of tree branches on the overhead system,
animal intrusion and erroneous operations. When the fault current magnitudes are
significant, it can cause damage to equipment and explosion if the fault is not
cleared for prolonged time. Also, electrical fires and shock hazards to people are
possible in a faulted power system. Therefore, it is important to design the power
system such that the fault is isolated quickly to minimize the equipment damage
and improve personnel safety.

Short circuit studies are performed to determine the magnitude of the current
flowing throughout the power system at various time intervals after a fault. The
magnitude of the current through the power system after a fault varies with time
until it reaches a steady state condition. During the fault, the power system is
called on to detect, interrupt and isolate these faults, The duty impressed on the
equipment is dependent on the magnitude of the current, which is a function of
the time of fault initiation. Such calculations are performed for various types of
fault such as three-phase, single line to ground fault, double line to ground fault
and at different location of the system. The calculated short circuit results are
used to select fuses, circuit breakers and protective relays. The symmetrical
component model is used in the analysis of the unsymmetrical faults with mutual
coupling.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The power system components such as utility sources, generators, motors,
transformers and cables are represented by impedance value. The short circuit study
is performed by representing the electric network in a matrix form. The program
places a fault at a required location and performs the short circuit calculations. The
short circuit study results are performed according to the applicable industry
standards.

4.2 SOURCES OF SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS

The short circuit current contributions are from the utility sources, generators,
synchronous condensers and induction motors. Typical current waveforms during a
short circuit are shown in Figure 4.1 for various types of contributing sources.

Utility sources - A utility represents the large interconnection of generators,

transmission lines and load circuits. The transmission lines, distribution lines and
transformers introduce impedance between the generator source and the fault point
during a short circuit. Therefore, the source voltage remains unaffected during fault
conditions.

Generator sources - An in-plant generator contributes to a short circuit and the

current decreases exponentially. The generator is driven by a prime mover and an
exciter supplies the field; the steady state current will persist unless the circuit is
open by a circuit breaker. The generator fault current is determined by three
reactance values during various time frames:

• Xd" - Direct axis sub-transient reactance, during the first cycle

• Xd' - Direct axis transient reactance, during 1 to 2 seconds
• Xd - Direct axis reactance, during steady state

The total short circuit current (It) of a generator consists of an ac component

(lac) and a dc component (Idc). These components are given by equations 4.1
through 4.3. The ac component of the generator fault current is:

1 1 .--1-
Iac = e Td" + (4.1)
X
.X d X d xd d

The dc component of the generator currents is:

r( 1 1 JL
Idc = (V2) — e'Td (4.2)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The total generator fault current (It) is:

c + Idc (4.3)

The reactance values are expressed in per unit in the above equations and the
calculated currents will be in per unit. An example is presented at the end of this
Chapter to show the generator short circuit currents.

Synchronous motor and synchronous condenser - The synchronous machines

supply fault current like a synchronous generator. The fault current decays rapidly
since the inertia of the motor and load acts as the prime mover with the field
excitation maintained. The fault current diminishes as the motor/condenser slows
down and the motor excitation decays.

Induction motor load - The fault current contribution from an induction motor is
due to the generator action produced by the load after the fault. The field flux of the
induction motor is produced due to the stator voltage and hence the current
contribution decays very rapidly upon fault clearing as the terminal voltage is
removed.

Total fault current as a function of time - When a short circuit occurs in a

system, the circuit impedance decreases appreciably. Therefore, the circuit current
increases significantly as shown in Figure 4.2. During an asymmetrical fault, the
total current can be treated as the sum of a dc current and a symmetrical ac
component. The direct component eventually decays to zero as the stored energy in
the system is expended in the form of I R loss. The direct current decay is inversely
proportional to the X/R ratio of the system between the source and the fault.
Therefore, it is important to analyze the short circuit current during the first cycle,
the next several cycles and in the steady state.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 UTILITY
CONTRIBUTION

GENERATOR
CONTRIBUTION

SYNCHRONOUS
MOTOR
CONTRIBUTION

INDUCTION
MOTOR
CONTRIBUTION

TOTAL
SHORT-CIRCUIT
CURRENT
WAVEFORM

Figure 4.1 Decaying Short Circuit Current Waveforms

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 TOTAL
DC SHORT-CIRCUIT
COMPONENT a CURRENT

Figure 4.2 Total Fault Current Waveform

4.3 SYSTEM IMPEDANCE DATA

Each component in an electrical system is represented by a suitable impedance

value. Then the impedance values are converted to a common base. The system
impedance data related issues are presented below.

Source data - The utility source is represented by a per unit impedance which is
equivalent to the maximum short circuit MVA level available from the utility at the
point of common coupling. The minimum source impedance is used in the short
circuit current calculations for relay settings. The source impedance data is usually
provided by the system/utility.

Example 4.1 - The three-phase and one line to ground fault short circuit duties of a
230 kV, 3-phase power system is 671 MVA and 738 MVA respectively. Find the
symmetrical component impedance values on a 100 MVA base.

Solution - Use an X/R ratio of 20.

kV
_~ = 78.8 Ohm
MVA,3ph 671

X (base) on 100 MVA base = (230 x 230)/100 - 529 Ohm

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 X, on 100 MVA base = 78. 8 Ohm/529 Ohm - 0.1489 P.U.

Ri on 100 MVA base = 0.1489 P.U./20 = 0.0073 P.U.

X = - =57.5 Ohm
0 MVA, slg MVA,3ph

X0 on 100 MVA base = 57.5 Ohm/529 Ohm =0.1086 P.U.

Ro on 1 00 MVA base = 0. 1 086 P.U./20 - 0.0054 P.U.

Transmission lines - The transmission lines are represented by positive and zero
sequence impedance values. The approach to calculate the transmission line
constants and typical values are presented in Chapter 2. In transmission lines it is
assumed that the positive and negative sequence impedance values are equal.

Cable data - The cable impedance values are presented by the positive and zero
sequence impedance values. The calculation procedures are discussed in Chapter 2.

Transformer impedance - The transformer impedance values are given in

percentage on the self-cooled transformer kVA rating and are converted to per unit
on the study base. Typical impedance data of two winding transformers up to 2.4
kV are presented in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 Typical Transformer Impedance up to 2.4 kV

3-Phase % Impedance
kVA X/R Ratio Range
112.5 3.0 1.6-6.2
150.0 3.5 1.5-6.4
225.0 4.0 2.0-6.6
300.0 4.5 2.0-6.0
500.0 5.0 2.1 -6.1
750.0 6.0 3.2-6.6
1000.0 7.0 3.2-6.6
1500.0 7.0 3.5-6.8
2000.0 8.0 3.5-6.8
2500.0 9.0 3.5-6.8

The impedance values for the transformers above 2.4 kV are listed in Table 4.2.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 4.2 Typical Transformer Impedance Above 2.4 kV Ratings

Primary Primary % Impedance

kV kVBIL Range
2.4 - 22.9 60-150 5.5-6.5
34.4 200.0 6.0-7.0
43.8 250.0 6.5-7.5
67.0 350.0 7.0-8.0
115.0 450.0 7.5-8.5
138.0 550.0 8.0-9.0

For the calculation of the line to ground fault short circuit currents, the zero
sequence connection diagram for certain transformers are required.

Synchronous machines - A synchronous machine is represented by the sub-

transient direct axis reactance. Typical reactance values for various synchronous
machines are presented in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 Typical Reactance of Synchronous Machines in Percentage

Type of Generator Xd Xq Xd' Xd" X2 xo

Turbo generator, 2 -pole 95 - 145 92 - 142 12-21 7-14 9-16 1 -8
Turbo generator, 4-pole 95 - 145 97 - 142 20-28 12-17 14-19 1.5-14
Waterwheel generator, no damper 60 - 145 40-95 20-45 17-40 30-65 4-25
Waterwheel generator, with damper 60 - 145 40-95 20-45 13-25 13-35 4-25
Synchronous condenser 150-220 95 -140 30-50 20-35 20-35 2-15
Salient pole motor, high speed 65-90 40- 100 15-35 10-25 10-25 2-15
Salient pole motor, low speed 80-150 40-100 40-70 25-45 25-45 4-27

Note: Use average value as typical data and on machine MVA base.

Induction motors - The kVA rating of induction motors is approximately equal to

the hp rating. The sub-transient reactance is given by the locked rotor reactance.
Typical locked rotor reactance values of various induction motors are given by:

Over 600 V = 0.17 P.U. on machine kVA base

600 V and less = 0.25 P.U. on machine kVA base

The motor resistance can be calculated using the X/R ratio curve given in ANSI
Standard 242. Sometimes, the motors in each substation are lumped by type and
size and a single per unit impedance is determined based on the lumped kVA.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 4.4 SHORT CIRCUIT CALCULATIONS

The following short circuit calculations are generally performed.

Three-phase fault - The three-phase conductors are shorted together. The

magnitude of the fault current is given by:

If = — (4.4)
L
\

Where E is the phase voltage and Zl is the positive sequence impedance.

Phase to ground fault - Where one phase conductor is shorted to ground. The fault
current magnitude is given by:

If =
(Z + zE z )
\ 2 + 0}
(L +L
(4 5)
'

Where Zi, Zi and Zo are the positive, negative and zero sequence impedances
respectively.

Double line to ground fault - Where two phase conductors are shorted to ground.
The positive sequence current magnitude is given by:

(4 6)
zZ 0/rz
(
2
+z '

The three-phase fault currents are the highest and least for phase to ground fault.
However, the phase to ground fault current can be the highest under certain
circumstances such as:

Near solidly grounded synchronous machines.

Near the solidly connected wye of a delta/wye transformer of the three
phase core/three leg design.
• A grounded wye/delta tertiary auto-transformer.
A grounded wye grounded wye/delta, three winding transformer.

Therefore, in systems with the above type of connections, it is necessary to conduct

a phase to ground fault calculation. For resistance grounded systems, the phase to
ground fault currents will be limited. The following assumptions are made in the
short circuit calculations:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 An unloaded power system is considered.
• The impedance at the fault location is assumed to be zero.
Load characteristics are ignored.
• Motors are assumed to run at rated speed with rated terminal voltage.
• Nominal transformer taps will be considered.
• A symmetrical three-phase power system is considered.

The momentary or first cycle, the interrupting and the symmetrical short circuit
currents are calculated to meet the circuit breaker selection and relay applications.

Momentary or first cycle short circuit current calculations - The momentary or

first cycle current is used to evaluate the closing or latching of the medium or high
voltage circuit breaker. The circuit impedance of the utility sources, generators,
transmission lines and transformers are used for the momentary current calculations.
The sub-transient reactance of utility source and the generator are used. The
reactance of the synchronous motors and induction motors are modified according
to Table 4.4 from IEEE Standard 141.

Table 4.4 Multipliers for Short Circuit Current Calculations

Type of Rotating Machine LV Studies First Cycle Interrupting

Generator, hydro generators with 1.0 Xd" 1.0 Xd" 1.0 Xd"
amortisseur windings & condensers
Synchronous motors 1.0 Xd" 1.0 Xd" l.SXd"
Induction motors
Above 1000 hp at 1800 rpm or less 1.0 Xd" 1.0 Xd" 1.5Xd"
Above 250 hp at 3600 rpm 1.0 Xd" 1.0 Xd" l.SXd"
All others, 50 hp and above 1.0 Xd" 1.2Xd" 3.0Xd"
Less than 50 hp Neglect Neglect Neglect

The impedance of the equivalent network is established and is converted into per
unit at each fault point. The first cycle fault current is calculated using the pre fault
voltage and the impedance at the faulted node. The approximate calculated first
cycle fault current for comparison with the circuit breaker capability is obtained by
using a 1.6 multiplier specified in ANSI C37.010-1989. The total three phase
symmetrical fault current (Isc tot) is:

Epu L6
Isc tot Ibase (4.7)
Xpu

This current magnitude is compared with the latching current rating of a circuit
breaker and the instantaneous rating of the relay settings.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Interrupting current calculations - The interrupting fault currents are calculated
in accordance with ANSI C37.010-1989 for symmetrical current rated circuit
breaker applications. The reactance of the rotating machines is chosen and applied
as per the multiplying factors listed in Table 4.4. For the calculation of the
interrupting currents, both the resistance and reactance of the equivalent circuit is
needed. Therefore, the equivalent R and X are calculated at the fault point and the
X/R ratio is determined. The interrupting current is calculated using the E/Z
method. A multiplying factor is calculated using the X/R ratio and the contact
parting time of the circuit breaker. The minimum contact parting times are
presented in Table 4.5 obtained from ANSI C37.010-1989.

Table 4.5 Contact Parting Time for Circuit Breakers

Rated Interrupting Time Minimum Contact Parting

Cycles at 60 Hz Time, Cycles at 60 Hz
6 4
5 3
3 2
2 1.5

The multiplying factors are plotted in ANSI C37.5-1979 for two specific
conditions.

• Fault fed predominantly from generators for three-phase faults (8, 5, 3 and 2
cycles).

• Fault fed predominantly from networks with two or more transformations for
three phase and line to ground faults (8, 5, 3 and 2 cycles).

The calculated interrupting fault current (lin) is given by:

=
Epu
lin (Multiplying Factor) ibase (4.10)
Xpu

This interrupting current is to be compared with circuit breaker interrupting

capability. It can be seen that the short circuit calculation procedures for the
momentary duty and the interrupting duty are different.

Short circuit calculations for low voltage circuit breaker applications - The
impedance diagram for evaluating the short circuit current at the faulted point
developed. The rotating machine impedance values used without multiplying
factors are shown in Table 4.4. The resistance values are also calculated using the

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 procedure used in the interrupting current calculations. The fault current is given by
E/Z. The low voltage short circuit values are used for the selection of the circuit
breakers including the molded case types.

Short circuit current calculation for relay applications - For the instantaneous
relay setting, the fault current magnitude from the momentary duty is used. For
other applications with a time delay, the steady state symmetrical fault currents are
calculated and used. The impedance for the transformer, overhead line and the
cables are obtained for the steady state conditions. The motor contributions are
neglected. For synchronous machines the steady state reactance can be used. In this
case it can be seen that the dc component has almost decayed to zero and it is not
considered. The required symmetrical fault current is obtained by using the E/Z
method. In many power system and industrial set ups, the source impedance is
different for peak and off-peak conditions. Therefore, the maximum and minimum
fault currents are to be calculated and the relay settings should be verified for both
conditions.

Impedance diagram - The impedance diagram is derived from the one line
diagram by modeling the circuit elements by the respective impedance. The
impedance magnitude used for the fault calculation depends on many factors which
are discussed in the circuit breaker current rating calculations. This is important for
the reactance of the rotating machines (see Table 4.4). Once the fault location and
type of short circuit is identified, then the corresponding impedance diagram is
developed. This concept is demonstrated with the help of an example.

Per unit quantities - For a balanced three-phase system, the relation of three-phase
kVA, line to line voltage, base current and base impedance are defined as:

Base kVA
Base current = —T= (411)
V3(BasekV)
(BasekVA) 2
Base impedance = (4 12)
BaseMVA

For changing the P.U. impedance from the given base kV to new base kV:
'kV.
given
Xnew (Xgiven) (4.13)
~kV
new
When both the kVA and kV are new, then the new P.U. impedance can be
calculated using the following equation:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 f .,,.
kVA
\ f -kV .
new given
Xnew (Xgiven) (4.14)
kVA kV
^ given new

Example 4.2 - The nameplate specifications of a two winding transformer are 40

MVA, 69 kV/13.8 kV, delta/wye-grounded, 7% impedance. This transformer is to
be connected in a 13.2 kV distribution system. The system studies are performed on
a 100 MVA base. Calculate the transformer impedance on 13.2 kV and 100 MVA
base.

Solution - The new P.U. impedance can be calculated as:

f r\r\\ f i o \^
Xnew = (7.0% |—J[—J =2.7324%

4.5 COMPUTER-AIDED ANALYSIS

There are several programs available to perform the short circuit studies. These
programs can be used to perform the following data-related operations.

Convert the raw system data to a common base.

• Prepare one-line diagrams.
• Determine system impedance for the calculation of momentary,
interrupting, symmetrical and relay short circuit currents.

The input data to these programs can be entered interactively or presented in ASCII
data files or through graphic interface. The output of the short circuit study includes
the following.

• Short circuit input data used in the network analysis.

• Calculations of three-phase, single line to ground fault, line to line and
double line to ground fault currents. For the three-phase, 4 wire system
with a neutral conductor, the short circuit currents are required for the line
to neutral short circuit.
• Calculation of appropriate circuit breaker current ratings based on ANSI
or IEC standards.
• Some programs present the short circuit outputs in a one line diagram with
the calculated values.
• Summary of currents at all the buses.

The user selects the necessary short circuit results at appropriate buses and

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 compares the results with the circuit breaker ratings. Also, the short circuit
currents are compared with the equipment short circuit ratings to ensure safe
performance.

Example 4.3 - An industrial power plant is shown in Figure 4.3. The 230 kV
source has a three-phase circuit current rating of 28,000 A. The step down
transformer (Tl) is 100 MVA, 230/24 kV, 0.10 P.U. reactance, delta/wye-
grounded with an X/R ratio of 20. There is a 500 MVA standby generator
connected to the 24 kV bus. The reactance of the generator is 0.2 P.U with X/R
ratio of 20. Transformer T2 is 75 MVA, 24/4.16 kV, delta/wye, 0.11 P.U.
reactance with X/R ratio of 30. There are two 2,000 hp, 0.9 power factor, Xd" =
0.2 P.U, Xd1 = 0.26 P.U. with X/R ratio of 20. The low voltage system contains a
transformer T3, 4.16 kV/600 V, 0.08 P.U reactance and X/R - 30. There is a low
voltage motor at the 600 V bus with a rating of 400 hp, Xd" = 0.3 and X/R = 30.
Perform a short circuit study using computer-aided software and determine the
short circuit currents at Fl and F2. Also, show the step-by-step calculations.
Compare the results.

Solution - The reactance of all the passive elements are listed below. A 100 MVA
base is used in the calculations.

Transformer, Tl, X = (0.10)( 100/100) = 0.1 P.U.

Transformer, T2, X = (0.11)( 100/75) =0.15 P.U.
Transformer, T3, X = (0.08)(100/0.75) = 10.67 P.U.

Sub-transient reactance of rotating machines

230 kV system short circuit MVA = (>/3 ) (230 kV) (28 kA) =11154
230 kV source impedance, X = 1.0 (100/11154) = 0.00896 P.U.
Generator Gl, X = (0.25) (100/500) = 0.05 P.U.
Induction motor Ml, X = (0.20) (100/2) = 10 P.U.
Induction motor M2, X = (0.20) (100/2) = 10 P.U.
Induction motor M3, X = (0.30) (100/0.4) = 75 P.U.

Momentary fault current calculations - For the momentary or first cycle short
circuit calculation, induction motors less than 50 hp are omitted. For the 400 hp
motor, X = 1.2 Xd" = (1.2) (75 P.U.) = 90 P.U. The reactance of the source,
generator and the induction motors are identified in the impedance diagram for the
first cycle or momentary short circuit calculations, in Figure 4.4.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 SOURCE, 23O kV

Gl

24 kV

4.16 kV

M2 Ml
M3

Figure 4.3 One-Line Diagram for Example 4.3

0.00896 P.U

Figure 4.4 Impedance Diagram for the Momentary Duty Calculation

The symmetrical first cycle or momentary short circuit current at the faulted point
Fl is calculated as:

Ibase at the 4.16 kV bus = 100 MVA/( >/3 )(4.16 kV) - 13.879 kA
1
Isym = (13.879kA) =78.3 kA
0.1772
The peak value of the momentary short circuit current is (1.6 x 78.3 kA) 125.3 kA.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Calculation of the interrupting short circuit current - The impedance diagram is
shown in Figure 4.5. The reactance, X/R ratios and the resistances for the circuit
breaker interrupting current calculations are listed below.

Transformer Tl, X/R = 30, R = (0.10/30) = 0.003 P.U.

Transformer T2, X/R = 30, R = (0.15/30) = 0.005 P.U.
Transformer T3, X/R = 30, R = (10.67/30) -3.560 P.U.

230 kV system, X/R = 20, R - (0.00896/20) = 0.00045 P.U.

Generator Gl, X/R = 20, R = (0.05/20) = 0.0025 P.U.
Motor Ml, X = (1.5 Xd") = (1.5 x 10) = 15 P.U.
Motor Ml, X/R = 20, R = (15/20) = 0.75 P.U.
Motor M2, X/R = 20, R = (15/20) = 0.75 P.U.
Motor M3, X = (3 Xd") = 3 x 75 = 225 P.U.
Motor M3, X/R = 30, R = (225/30) = 7.5 P.U.
E/X = | (13.879kA) = 77.32kA
0.1795J

0.00896 P.U

1795 P.U

Figure 4.5 Impedance Diagram for the Interrupting Duty Calculation

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 0.00045 P.U

Figure 4.6 Resistance Diagram for the Interrupting Duty Calculation

The resistance circuit for the interrupting duty calculation is presented in Figure 4.6.
Using the reduced R, the X/R ratio is calculated at the faulted point Fl.

The X/R ratio at the faulted point Fl = 0.1795/0.0054 = 33.24

The corresponding NCAD ratio is determined from C37.010. The NCAD ratio for
X/R ratio of 33.24 is 0.96.

The interrupting current = (77.32 kA) (0.96) = 74.2 kA

Short circuit calculation for low voltage circuit breaker applications - The
impedance diagram for evaluating the short circuit current at the faulted point F2
is shown in Figure 4.7. The impedance at F2 = (1.4698 + j 9.4817) P.U. =
9.5949 P.U. The base current at 600 V is 96.2278 kA. The short circuit current at
F2is 10.41 kA.

0.184 P.IM 0.0065 P.U 1.4698 P.U

9.4817 P.U
3.56 P.U

2.5 P.U

Figure 4.7 Impedance Diagram for the Low Voltage Short Circuit Current Study

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Computer-aided analysis - The data is entered interactively to the program and the
input data listings and the output summary are presented below. The software used
in the calculations was the AFAULT program from the SKM System Analysis. The
present version of the program is called Power tools for Windows with the
particular option [9]. The program performs the calculations by placing various
faults at each node for different fault duties. The equipment voltage rating,
reactance and the reactance to the 100 MVA base are displayed. The input data is
classified into various sections as discussed below.

Source data as per List 4.1. - From Bus, to Bus, Voltage, Base MVA, Xd", X/R,
X on 100 MVA Base.
List 4.1 Source Data
Xd" Zon 100 MVA Base
From Bus To Bus kV Base MVA P.U X/R P.U
Source Bus 1 230 11154 28 20 (0.00045 +J0.00895)
Generator 1 Bus 5 24 500 0.25 20 (0.0025 +j 0.05)
Motor M 1 Bus 9 4.16 2 0.2 20 (0.5 + j 10)
Motor M2 Bus 10 4.16 2 0.2 20 (0.5 + j 10)
Motor M3 Bus 11 0.6 0.4 0.3 30 (2.5+J75)

Feeder data as per List 4.2. The assumed impedance values are low and are not
used in the step-by-step calculations. From Bus, to Bus, Voltage, Length in Feet, Zl
or Z2 in P.U, ZO in P.U.

List 4.2 Feeder Data

Line Length
From Bus To Bus kV Feet Z l o r Z 2 , P.U. ZO, P.U.
Bus 1 Bus 2 230 125 (0.0 + j 0.01) (0.0 + j 0.03)
Bus 3 Bus 4 24 125 (0.0 + j 0.01) (0.0 + j 0.03)
Bus 4 Bus 5 24 125 (0.0 + j 0.00022) (0.0 + j 0.00065)
Bus 4 Bus 6 24 250 (0.0 + j 0.00043) (0.0 + j 0.001 30)
Bus? Bus 8 4.16 250 (0.0 + j 0.01445) (0.0 + j 0.04334)
Bus 8 Bus 9 4.16 130 (0.0 + j 0.00751) (0.0 + j 0.02254)
Bus 9 Bus 10 4.16 150 (0.0 + j 0.00867) (0.0 + j 0.026)

Transformer data as per List 4.3 - Primary Bus, Connection, Voltage, Secondary
Bus, Connection, Voltage, MVA Base, Z1/Z2 on 100 MVA Base, ZO on 100 MVA
Base.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 List 4.3 Transformer Data
Primary Primary Sec Sec
From Bus To Bus Conn kV Conn kV Zl orZ2, P.U. ZO, P.U.
Bus 2 Bus 3 Del 230 Wye 24 (0.03 + j 0.10) (0.0003 + j 0.10)
Bus 6 Bus? Del 24 Wye 4.16 (0.048 + j 0.1 467) (0.005+ J O . 1467)
Bus 8 Bus 11 Del 4.16 Wye 0.6 (0.36 +j 10.6667) (0.36 + j 10.6667)

The program calculates the short circuit components at each bus location for the
various fault duties along with the summary for each type of calculations. The
summary of the typical output listing is presented below.

Fault current for the low voltage circuit breaker applications as per List 4.4.
The list includes the Bus Number, Bus Name, Voltage, Fault Current for Three-
Phase, X/R Ratio, Fault Current for SLG, X/R Ratio.

List 4.4 Fault Current for the Low Voltage Circuit Breaker Applications

Voltage 3 Phase 3 Phase SLG SLG

Bus# Bus Name Volts Fit, kA X/R kA X/R
1 BUS 1 230000 29.478 20.55
2 BUS 2 230000 14.811 40.94
3 BUS 3 24000 60.47 27.6 40.181 30.53
4 BUS 4 24000 66.981 24.91 35.753 34.31
5 BUSS 24000 67.155 24.85 35.671 34.39
6 BUS 6 24000 66.194 25.21 35.375 34.68
7 BUS 7 4160 78.611 29 83.298 29.44
8 BUSS 4160 73.095 31.19 73.07 33.57
9 BUS 9 4160 70.521 32.33 68.684 35.71
10 BUS 10 4160 67.662 33.7 64.172 38.22
11 BUS 11 600 10.14 29.7 9.736 29.67

Fault current for momentary or first cycle as per List 4.5. The list includes the
Bus Number, Bus Name, Voltage, Fault Current for 3-Phase, X/R Ratio, Fault
Current for SLG, X/R Ratio. The fault current magnitude is 1.6 times the short
circuit at the fault location.

Fault current for interrupting as per List 4.6. The output contains the Bus
Number, Bus Name, Voltage, decrement ratio, Fault Current for three-Phase, X/R
Ratio, Fault Current for SLG, X/R Ratio.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 List 4.5 Fault Current for the Momentary Duty
Voltage 3 Phase 3 Phase SLG SLG
Bus# Bus Name Volts E/Z* 1.6 X/R E/Z* 1.6 X/R
1 BUS1 230000 47.165 20.55
2 BUS 2 230000 23.697 40.94
3 BUS 3 24000 96.751 27.6 64.29 30.53
4 BUS 4 24000 107.17 24.91 57.204 34.31
5 BUSS 24000 107.448 24.85 57.073 34.39
6 BUS 6 24000 105.91 25.21 56.6 34.68
7 BUS 7 4160 125.778 29 133.277 29.44
8 BUSS 4160 116.952 31.19 116.913 33.57
9 BUS 9 4160 112.834 32.33 109.895 35.71
10 BUS 10 4160 108.259 33.7 102.675 38.22

List 4.6 Fault Current for the Interrupting Duty

Voltage 3 Phase 3 Phase SLG SLG
Bus# Bus Name Volts Ratio E/ZKA X/R E/ZKA X/R
1 BUS 1 230000 0.999 29.478 20.55
2 BUS 2 230000 0.999 14.811 40.94
3 BUSS 24000 0.334 60.47 27.6 40.181 30.53
4 BUS 4 24000 0.278 66.981 24.91 35.753 34.31
5 BUSS 24000 0.277 67.155 24.85 35.671 34.39
6 BUS 6 24000 0.278 66.194 25.21 35.375 34.68
7 BUS 7 4160 0.963 78.611 29 83.298 29.44
8 BUS 8 4160 0.96 73.095 31.19 73.07 33.57
9 BUS 9 4160 0.959 70.521 32.33 68.684 35.71
10 BUS 10 4160 0.958 67.662 33.7 64. 1 72 38.22

The results from the step-by-step calculations and the computer-aided analysis are
compared at the faulted points Fl (node 8) and F2 (node 11).

Description Calculated Computer-Aided

Momentary at Fl (node 8) 125.3 kA 116.952 kA
Interrupting at F1 (node 8) 74.2 kA 73.095 kA
Low voltage short circuit at F2 (node 11) 10.41 kA 10.140 kA

In the step-by-step calculations, the cable lengths are ignored. Therefore, the
calculated short circuit currents are higher than the values from the computer-aided
analysis.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 4.6 LIMITING THE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS

Using series reactors, high impedance transformers and high resistance grounding
can control the short circuit current in the power system. The series reactor can be
used in the generator circuits, bus bars, feeders and in the shunt capacitance circuits.
There are advantages and limitations to these approaches. With the application of
shunt capacitor banks for power factor correction, there is always the inrush current
issue during energization. Also, the outrush current from the capacitor banks is a
concern when a line circuit breaker closes in to a nearby fault. In order to limit both
the inrush and outrush currents series reactors are used. Three schemes of series
reactors for shunt capacitor application are discussed.

Scheme 1: Series reactor with each capacitor bank - Such a scheme is shown in
Figure 4.8. In order to satisfy the criteria (Iph . f) to less than 2.0E+7, there will be
two reactors with two capacitor banks.

Scheme 2: Series capacitors for inrush and outrush requirements - The required
scheme is shown in Figure 4.8. The reactor size for each capacitor bank will be
small to limit the inrush current. A third reactor will be used to limit the outrush
current.

Scheme 3: Reactor to limit outrush current and breaker to limit the inrush current -
The inrush current can be controlled by using circuit breaker with controlled
switching or by using closing resistor/inductor. The outrush current can be
controlled by using a series reactor. Such a scheme is shown in Figure 4.8.

Example 4.4 - In order to demonstrate the circuit breaker selection and the
application of series reactor for the current limiting a shunt capacitor bank, a case
is presented. The circuit breaker is chosen to meet this application and the short
circuit current magnitudes are calculated if the required current specifications are
met. Then a reactor is chosen in series with the circuit breaker and the procedure
is repeated. The system is a 230 kV, 60 Hz, three-phase with a short circuit rating
of 40 kA. The circuit breaker has to be selected for capacitor switching
application. The capacitor is available in two banks each of which is 60 MVAR.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Scheme 1
L1, L2 - Series Reactors
C1, C2 - Capacitance

L3

Scheme 2
L2 L1, L2 , L3- Series Reactors
L1
C1, C2 - Capacitance

-C1

L3

Scheme 3
L2, L3 - Series Reactors
L2
C1, C2 - Capacitance

C2

Figure 4.8 Series Reactor Schemes for Current Limiting

Solution - The circuit breaker is intended to switch 120 MVAR shunt capacitor
banks and should meet the performance criteria described in ANSI C37.06 [7].
The desired performance specifications of the circuit breaker to meet the
capacitor switching application (definite purpose) of the 230 kV systems are:

Nominal voltage rating = 230 kV

Maximum voltage rating = 242 kV
Rated current = 2000 A
Three-phase short circuit rating = 40kA

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Rated capacitive current (breaking duty) = 400 A
TRY 188 kV peak - peak voltage base = 443 kV (2.4 PU)
Inrush current = 20 kA peak
Transient frequency = 4,250 Hz
Without current limiting reactor - When a system fault occurs near the
capacitor bank location, the electrical energy stored in the capacitor bank
discharges through the low fault impedance with considerable magnitude and at
high frequency. Such a system is shown in Figure 4.9. The size of the 230 kV
capacitor bank is 60 MVAR, three-phase.
Fault
System

'pk

Capacitor
Bank

Figure 4.9 Fault Outside the Circuit Breaker Without Series Reactor

The expected outrush current magnitude and frequency, for a single 60 MVAR,
230 kV capacitor bank is given by:

/-< _ MVAR 60
= 3 MFD
2 >r(60) x k V 2 2 ;r(60) x 2302

V 230 k V x • / r
Pk
TI pk --_--^=__--54.1kA
_ V/V3, 5111.A

.T _
= 15.3kHz
2 ^L f x C 2 > /36.1//Hx3//F

An inductance of 10^ H for the bank and 0.261 JU H/ft with a 100 feet cable
length is used (IEEE C37.012-1998).

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The calculated outrush current magnitude of 54.1 kA is much higher than the
allowable IEEE Standard C37.06 (Table 3A) value of 20 kA. Also, the
frequency of the outrush current is higher than the allowed value of 4,250 Hz.
The outrush current from the capacitor bank needs to be controlled using current
limiting series reactors. The minimum series reactor needed to limit the (Ipk x f)
product to less than 2.0 x 10 is given by:

Vpk
'min 7
2n x2 xlO

With current limiting reactor - The equivalent circuit with a series reactor in
the shunt capacitor circuit is shown in Figure 4.10. For the proposed 230 kV, 60
MVAR bank the minimum reactor needed is:

230 kVx
T

min ~
_
= 1.5 mH
2 ;r(2x!0 7 )

For the high outrush current to occur, a breaker must close into a fault very close
to the 230 kV substation. A series inductor of 3 mH is selected for the 230 kV
circuit and the corresponding Ipk and the frequency of oscillation are given by:

= 6kA

f = = 1.68 kHz
2 Af x C 2 ^3000 y u H x 3

This peak current and the frequency of oscillation are below the ANSI C37.06
values. Therefore, the circuit breaker is acceptable for the energization of the
230 kV, 60 MVAR shunt capacitor bank.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Reactor

Circuit
Breaker

C1 = 60 MVAR

Figure 4. 10 Capacitor Circuit with Series Reactor

From this example, it is clear that series reactors can be useful in shunt capacitor
circuits to limit the fault current magnitudes and in the protection of circuit
breakers.

Example 4.5 - Consider a 800 MVA, 13.8 kV generator with the following
parameters:

Xd" = 0.210 P.U. TdO" =0.0348

Xd? -0.330 P.U. TdO1 =7.6280
Xd =1.820 P.U. TdO =0.330

Calculate the total fault currents at 1.5 cycles.

Solution -

(IT)
Xd" = (0.210)1 -^- | = 0.02625 P.U.
v j
X'd = (0.330) = 0.04125 P.U.
800
f 100^1
Xd = ( 1 . 8 2 0 ) =0.2275 P.U.
\800j
The ac components of the generator short circuit currents are:

Id" = = 38.10 P.U.

vx
^day

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Id' - = 24.242 P.U.

Id = = 4.3956 P.U.
V y

The time constants of the ac currents are given by:

" ^
— (TdO") = 0.02215 s = 1.3287 cycles

T'd = Xd. (TdO') = 1.3830 s = 82.98 cycles

X,

The ac component of the generator fault current is:

t t
Iac = (Id"-Id')e"Td" +(I'd-Id) e ~Td' + W

At 1.5 cycles, the ac current components are:

lac = (13.858 x 0.3233) + (19.8464 x 0.982) + 4.3956

= 28.3667 on 100 MVA base

100MVA
Ibase = 4.18kA
V3(13.8kV)
lac = (28.3667 P.U.) (4.18 kA) = 118.6814 kA

The dc component of the generator currents is:

Idc = (A/2) (38.10) e ~Td Where Td in cycles is (0.33 x 60) 19.8 cycles.

Idc at a time oft =1.5 cycles is:

Idc = 49.9428 P.U. on a 100 MVA base

= (49.9428 P.U. x 4.18 kA) = 208.95 kA

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The total generator fault current (It) is:

It = Vlac 2 + Idc2 = V118.68 2 + 208.952 = 240.3 kA

Therefore, in the generator circuit there are both ac and dc current components
present as shown.

PROBLEMS

1. The three-phase short circuit rating of a 230 kV, 60 Hz system is 670 MVA.
The single line to ground fault rating is 600 MVA. Calculate the source
impedance values on a 100 MVA base. State the assumptions made, if any.

2. The three phase short circuit rating of a 345 kV source is 20,000 MVA and
the single line to ground short circuit MVA is 15,200 MVA. Calculate the
sequence impedance of the source in P.U. on a 100 MAV base.

3. A 75 kVA, 14 kV/4.16 kV, delta/wye-grounded, 6% impedance transformer is

to be used in a 13.8 kV distribution system. The system studies are performed
on a 100 MVA base. Calculate the transformer impedance for the new bases.

4. Calculate the total fault currents due to a 3-phase fault at the open terminals of
a generator at 1.6 cycles. The name plate specifications of the generator are
500 MVA, 13.8 kV with the following parameters:

Xd" =0.200 P.U. TdO" =0.030

Xd' =0.350 P.U. TdO' =8.000
Xd =1.800 P.U. TdO =0.350

5. What are the different types of faults in a power system? What is the role of a
neutral conductor in the power system?

6. Why is it necessary to select a circuit breaker based on the short circuit current
ratings?

7. Consider an industrial power system with a 115 kV source from a substation

(Bus 1) to the next substation (Bus 2) connected through an overhead line. Bus
2 is connected to Bus 3 through an underground cable of 2,000 feet length. A
step down transformer at Bus 3 supplies an electrical motor at 13.8 kV. The
necessary system data are as follow:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Source impedance on 100 MVA base is:
Z, =Z 2 = (0.0026 + j 0.0218) P.U.
Zo = (0.0071 +j 0.02441) P.U.

Overhead line impedance between Bus 1 and Bus 2 on 100 MVA base:
Z = (0.0120 +j 0.0820) P.U.

Cable impedance between Bus 2 and Bus 3:

Zi = (0.0118 + j 0.0980) Ohm/1000 feet
ZO = (0.0656 + j 0.5889) Ohm/1000 feet

Transformer impedance at Bus 3:

MVA = 120
Voltage ratio =115 kV/4.16 kV
Connection = Wye/Delta
Reactance = 12%

Induction motor drive:

Rating =100MW
Voltage = 13.8kV
Power factor =0.8

Draw the one-line diagram of the system and state the assumptions. Calculate
the short circuit currents at each node and select the circuit breaker ratings at
appropriate locations. Also calculate the voltage drop at various locations. If
the voltage profile is not acceptable, suggest suitable remedial actions.
Compare the calculated results with a computer program output.

8. Refer to Example 4 regarding the energization of a 60 MVAR capacitor bank.

Using the same circuit breaker, an additional 60 MVAR shunt capacitor bank
is to be connected for power factor correction purposes. This capacitor bank
is to be energized through a circuit switcher as shown in Figure 4.11. The
value of the series reactor is 20 mH. Calculate the Ipk and frequency of
oscillation without series reactor and with series reactor. Discuss the circuit
breaker suitability for the given application.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Circuit Switcher
with Series Reactor

Reactor

Circuit
Breaker

C1 = 60 MVAR C2 = 60 MVAR

Figure 4.11 Back-to-Back Capacitor Switching with a Circuit Switcher

REFERENCES

1. ANSI/IEEE Standard: 141, IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical

Distribution for Industrial Plants, 1996 (Red Book).

2. ANSI/IEEE Standard: 399, IEEE Recommended Practice for Power

System Analysis, 1990 (Brown Book).

3. ANSI Standard: C37.10, American National Standard Requirements for

Transformers 230,000 Volts and Below.

4. ANSI Standard 242, IEEE Recommended Practice for Protection and

Coordination of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems, 1986.

5. ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.010, IEEE Application Guide for AC High

Voltage Circuit Breakers Based on a Symmetrical Current Basis, 1989.

6. ANSI/IEEE Standard C37.13, IEEE Standard for Low Voltage AC Power

Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures, 1981.

7. ANSI Standard C37.06, AC High Voltage Circuit Breakers Rated on a

Symmetrical Current Basis, 2000.

8. ANSI Standard C37.012, Application Guide for Capacitance Current

Switching for AC High Voltage Circuit Breaker Rated on a Symmetrical
Current Basis, 1998.

9. Power Tools for Windows, SKM System Analysis, Inc., Manhattan

Beach, California.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 5
TRANSIENT STABILITY ANALYSIS

5.1 INTRODUCTION

Transient stability studies are related to the effects of transmission line faults on
generator synchronism. During the fault the electrical power from the nearby
generators is reduced and the power from remote generators remains relatively
unchanged. The resultant differences in acceleration produce speed differences
over the time interval of the fault and it is important to clear the fault as quickly as
possible. The fault clearing removes one or more transmission elements and
weakens the system. The change in the transmission system produces change in the
generator rotor angles. If the changes are such that the accelerated machines pick up
additional load, they slow down and a new equilibrium position is reached. The
loss of synchronism will be evident within one second of the initial disturbance.

Faults on heavily loaded lines are more likely to cause instability than the faults on
lightly loaded lines because they tend to produce more acceleration during the fault.
Three phase faults produce greater accelerations than those involving one or two
phase conductors. Faults not cleared by primary faults produce more angle
deviations in the nearby generators. Also, the backup fault clearing is performed
after a time delay and hence produces severe oscillations. The loss of a major load
or a major generating station produces significant disturbance in the system. In the
power system, the various electrical phenomena occur in different time frames as
shown in Figure 5.1. These include:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Power Swings
Frequency Operations,
Switching Sure es Changes I Planning

1
i i
Q^ 1C 0.1 10 100 1000 10" 106 10?

1 Da 1
1cy cle 1 Mn 1 Hour V Week

Figure 5.1 Power System Transients

• Switching surges, below one cycle duration.

• Power swings, a few cycles.
• Frequency changes, a few minutes to one hour.
• Operation and planning issues, several days to years.

The switching surges are studied using the electromagnetic transients program. The
power system swings are studied using the transient stability program. The transient
stability studies are performed as a part of the planning to the addition of new
generators, transmission lines and power factor correction equipment. The system
response is usually nonlinear and hence the transient stability simulations performed
for one condition can not apply to a similar condition in another part of the network.
Therefore, various operating conditions are studied during the transient analysis.

Problems caused by instability - The transient instability on a generator produces

high transient shaft torques. In order to protect the generator from such transient
torques they are tripped using suitable protection. Such protection is provided on
large generators, synchronous condensers and large synchronous motors in the form
of loss of field relaying. The tripping of many generators may lead to voltage
depression in a system. A system with oscillatory generators may also lead to the
tripping of the generators and lines. In order to avoid cascaded tripping and prevent
a total blackout, many utilities try to perform a systematic load shedding.

5.2 STEADY STATE STABILITY

Consider a generator connected to a remote source through a line impedance Z as

shown in Figure 5.2. The phasor diagram of the one machine system is shown in
Figure 5.2.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 E1

Figure 5.2 One Machine System

The current I is given by:

E1-E2
I = (5.1)

The expression for power (P) is:

* (E1-E2)
P - Real (Ell ) = Real[El- -

El (El E2)
P = Sina + -—j—— Sin(S-a) (5.2)
Z Z

Where Z = (R + jX). For a pure reactance, Z = jX and a = 0,

E1E2
= (5.3)
X

This is the generator electrical power, where 5 is the rotor angle. This is a sine
function as shown in Figure 5.3. The operating point occurs where the electrical
power output of the generator Pe is balanced with the mechanical power (Pm). A
change in the angle away from the operating point will result in a power imbalance,
which acts to accelerate or decelerate the rotor. The Pmax point is the maximum
power possible from the generator. The (0 through 90) degree is the steady state
operating range in a stable mode. The (90 through 180) degree is the unstable
operating region of the generator. The steady state operating limit is obtained from
equation (5.3) given by the relation:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 1 90 -
Stable Region ^
^ Unstable Region
1 no -.
^ / ^ ^X^ Unstable
. n RO
Stable X^ N. Operating
£L
Rn Operating >/
. - un bu X Point ,
oj - "

S. o 4n
Point • X
\7~
O on
/ \_
n on -
/ \
(D 30 60 S)0 120 150 180
Angle, Degree

Figure 5.3 Power Angle Curve

dP (El E2)
— =0= ^ iCos£ = 0 (5.4)
d^ X
This occurs when o = 90 degree. The maximum power Pmax is:
Ell |E2
(5.5)
max X

Pmax is the steady state stability limit.

5.3 TRANSIENT STABILITY

The transient stability analysis refers to the immediate effects of transmission line
disturbances on generator synchronism [1]. The three types of transient
disturbances of importance are load changes, switching operation and faults in
subsequent circuit isolation. In order to demonstrate the concept of transient
stability using equal area criteria, a disturbance due to load change is considered. A
sudden load increase can result in transient disturbance. In Figure 5.4, point 1
(angle o \) shows the operating point of a generator on the power angle curve with
load 1 and point 2 (angle 8 2) shows the operating point at load 2. Because of the
inertia of the rotating parts of the machine and the internal voltage of the generator,
the rotor angle does not change momentarily to operating point 2. Instead, the
differences in the power input and output are used in accelerating the generator
rotor. In this process, the rotor angle overshoots to point 3 and comes back to

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 operating point 2. For a stable operation, the area Al is equal to area A2. This is
given by:
El E2 El E2
P = Sin S\ = Sin 82 (5.6)
X X

This condition is shown in Figure 5.4, where 8 3 is greater than 90 degrees but is
stable because o 3 is less than o 4 the critical angle for the load 2. With load 2, the
angle settles to S 2 with a stable operating point. If the angle at point 3 exceeds the
angle at point 4, then there may not a stable operating point.

P
o
w
e
r
Al

Load 1

Angle

Figure 5.4 Power Angle Curve, Equal Angle Criteria During Load Change

Oscillatory stability - A machine being transiently stable on the first swing does
not guarantee that it will return to the steady state operating point. System effects
such as sudden changes in load, short circuits and transmission line switching not
only introduce transient disturbances on machines but also give rise to less stable
operating conditions. For example, if a transmission line is tripped due to a fault,
the resulting system may be much weaker than the pre-fault condition and
oscillatory instability may result. The oscillation may decrease and the machine may
become stable. Sometimes the oscillations may increase, leading to loss of
synchronism. In either case, the oscillatory mode is undesirable.

5.3.1 Swing Equation

Following a system disturbance or load change on a power system, a generating unit

tends to oscillate around its operating point until it reaches a steady state. For a
synchronous machine with constant field excitation, an equation for the dynamic

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 motion is obtained by relating the angular acceleration of the rotor to the rotor
torque. This relation is:

(Inertia) (Angular acceleration) + Damping torque + (Te - Tm) = 0

For small deviations the characteristic equation can be written as:

2Hd2 8 Dd 8 , 0
1A£ = 0 (5.7)
2 dt
dt

This is called the swing equation [1], where:

Ac) = Rotor angle deviation from the steady state, radians

H = Inertia constant of the generator unit, kW-sec/kVA
D = Damping coefficient representing friction
0.23 1(J) (RPM 2 ) ( 1 0 ~ 9 )
H = -^— ^--- v (5 8)
Base MVA '

0) = Synchronous frequency, 377 radians/s for 60 HZ system

Kl = Synchronizing coefficient, P.U. power/Radian
Rpm = Synchronous machine speed in revolutions/minute
J = Moment of inertia, Ib-fT

The term Kl is called the synchronizing power that acts to accelerate or decelerate
the inertia towards the synchronous operating point. The synchronizing coefficient
Kl is the slope of the transient power angle curve.
dP El E2
Kl = Cos 5 (5.9)
d5 X
Where
El = Internal voltage behind transient reactance, P.U.
E2 - Bus voltage, P.U.
X = (Xd' + Xe) = Series reactance between the terminal voltage and the
infinite bus, P.U.
Xd' = Generator transient reactance, P.U.
8 = Angle between El and E2

The swing equation governs the power system dynamic response with a frequency
given by:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 iKlto

This is called the natural frequency of the local mode. This frequency of oscillation
is usually 0.5 Hz to 2.5 Hz.

Example 5.1 - A generator connected to an infinite bus has the following

parameters:

H = 3.2 8 = 25 degrees Xd' - 0.25 P.U Xe = 0.3 P.U

E1 = 1.05P.U E2=1.0P.U
Find the local frequency of oscillation.

Solution:
Kl.* 1 - 0 5 *'- 0 ) Cos(25) = 1.73
(0.25 + 0.30)

con = = io.69Rad/s (1.61 Hz)

(2)(3.2)

Inter area oscillations - If two areas in a power system are interconnected by a

weak power line, then there may be a low frequency oscillation between these
systems. An example system is shown in Figure 5.5. Then the inter area oscillation
can be evaluated using the effective value of H is given by:
TT (H1)(H2)

Where HI and H2 are the inertia constants of system 1 and 2. If there are many such
areas present in a power system, then a computer-aided solution can be obtained.

Tie Line

Figure 5.5 Two Areas Interconnected by a Tie Line

If the systems MVAs to be combined are different, equation (5.11) is not

applicable.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 5.4 CRITERIA FOR STABILITY

The purpose of the transient stability analysis is to study the stability issues of the
generating units for disturbances on the interconnections with the main grid. The
stability of the generating units will depend on the dynamic characteristics of the
entire grid as well as those of the generating units connected to the system.
Consequently it is necessary to model the dynamics of the entire power system
along with load flow for the maximum load conditions. Sometimes it may be
necessary to analyze the stability issues of a lightly loaded system as well. The
transient stability performance will be assessed in accordance with the utility's
standards for planning and operating criteria. The stability cases are classified as
either design requirement cases or extreme contingency assessment cases.

Design requirement cases - These are cases for which the stability of the bulk
power system shall be maintained. These cases include the following contingencies:

• A permanent three-phase fault on any generator, transmission circuit,

transformer or bus section with normal fault clearing.

• A permanent phase to ground fault on any transmission circuit, transformer or

any bus section with delayed clearing.

All generating units shall remain stable following a permanent three-phase fault
on any transmission element with normal fault clearing and with due regard to
reclosing facilities.

Extreme contingency assessment cases - These are cases for which the extent of a
widespread system disturbance is to be determined, even though extreme
contingencies have low probabilities of occurrence. These cases include a
permanent three-phase fault on any generator, transmission circuit, transformer or
bus section, with delayed fault clearing. The critical clearing times to maintain
stability should be determined for these cases.

Critical fault clearing times - The critical clearing time is the maximum allowable
time that a fault can be sustained without the synchronous generator becoming
unstable. Typical fault clearing times are:

• For a three-phase fault, the typical maximum fault clearing time (including the
relay operating time plus circuit breaker opening time) is 8 cycles.

• For a double line to ground fault, the typical maximum fault clearing time,
including the breaker failure is 17 cycles.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • For a line-to-ground fault, the typical maximum fault clearing time (including
the backup relay operating time plus circuit breaker opening time) is 30 cycles.

Assessment of the rotor angles for stability - As per classical stability theory, the
generator will be stable for steady state rotor angles below 90 degrees and unstable
for above 90 degrees. However, the rotor angles can swing into the unstable region
during transient conditions and will be back in the stable-operating region. In the
transient stability studies, the relative rotor angles are monitored with respect to the
swing generator. Depending on the rotor angle oscillation, the generators can be
stable, unstable or oscillatory. Typical rotor angle plots for the above three
conditions are shown in Figure 5.6. If the rotor angle swings around 90 degrees and
decays very rapidly, then the generator is stable. If the rotor angle goes beyond 180
degrees in the first cycle, then the generator is unstable. If the rotor angle continues
to oscillate without damping, then the generator is oscillatory. The unstable and
oscillatory cases are unacceptable.

i i i i i i n
T1HE (SECONDS)

Figure 5.6 The Stable, Unstable, and Oscillatory Rotor Angles

(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc, Output from PSS/E Program)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Voltage swing during the disturbances - It is customary to monitor the bus
voltages at critical locations during transient stability studies. During the fault, the
bus voltage drops and upon fault clearing the voltage recovers. As per industrial
standards, the allowable voltage dips during the fault is identified in Chapter 6.
From the stability point of view, the voltage has to recover to the rated voltage
immediately after fault clearing. Such a voltage condition is acceptable and is
shown in Figure 5.7. If the voltage fails to recover and is oscillatory, then such a
condition is marginal and is unacceptable. If the voltage falls below 60% of the
rated voltage and fails to recover (voltage collapse), such a condition is
unacceptable.

Figure 5.7 Voltage Recovery Followed by Fault Clearing

(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc, Output fromPSS/E Program)

5.5 POWER SYSTEM COMPONENT MODELS

In order to perform transient stability analysis, the models of the generators,

excitation systems, governors and other critical component are required. The
transmission lines are usually represented by positive sequence impedance. The
other important models are discussed below.

Type of generator units - Several type of generating units are used for power
production depending on the type of fuel used. The fossil, nuclear, combustion
turbines, hydro unit, combined cycle units and the diesel generators are used in
power production. Typical characteristics of these units are discussed below.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Fossil units - The bulk of the power for utility applications are generated using the
fossil fuel (coal, oil and natural gas) units. The size of the units varies from a few
MW to 1000 MW. The smaller units were common in plants installed in 1950s.

Nuclear steam units - Nuclear units are either light water reactor (LWR) or
pressure water reactor (PWR) units.

Combustion turbine units - The combustion turbines are designed to burn liquid,
gas fuel or natural gas. These units can be either industrial or jet engines. Therefore,
generally high speed engines are used.

Hydro units - These generator units are used for conventional or pumped storage
applications. The conventional hydro units may be low head, medium head or high
head. The pumped storage units are used as peaking units. Water is pumped from
the lower reservoir to the upper reservoir during off peak hours. During peak hours,
the water in the upper reservoir is used to produce electricity. Hydro power is the
cheapest and cleanest form of electrical energy.

Combined cycle units - In the combined cycle units, the gas turbine is used to
operate as the main power generating unit. The exhaust heat of the gas turbine is
used in a steam boiler to operate a steam turbine generator. Therefore, the overall
efficiency of the combined cycle generation is higher than the other forms of
generation.

Diesel engines - For emergency and standby production of electricity, small diesel
engine driven generators are used.

Generator models - Usually block diagram representation of the synchronous

machine is used in the small signal analysis [1,6]. The needed variables are
electrical torque, speed, rotor angle, terminal voltage and the field voltage. This
model represents a generator as it behaves when connected to an infinite bus
through an external reactance. The linearized model can be used in both the time
and frequency domain analysis. The model is based on the d-q axis theory and the
state variable approach is used. The parameters used in the generator modeling are:

Symbol Description
MVA Generator MVA Rating
T'do Direct axis transient time constant, second
T"do Direct axis sub-transient time constant, second
T'qo Quadrature axis transient time constant, second
T"qo Quadrature axis sub-transient time constant (second)
H Inertia constant (machine MVA base) MW/s-MVA

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 D Damping factor
Xd Synchronous reactance, direct axis
Xq Synchronous reactance, quadrature axis
X'd Transient reactance, direct axis
X'q Transient reactance, quadrature axis
X"d Sub-transient reactance, direct axis
XI Leakage reactance
S(l .0) Saturation factor at 1.0 P.U.
S(l .2) Saturation factor at 1.2 P.U.

Some of the models available for the generator are:

Classical H D Xd'
Laminated rotor
without damper H D Xd Xd' Xq Tdo1
Generator with
damper windings H D Xd Xd1 Xd" Xq Xq' Xq" Tdo'Tdo" XI
Solid rotor H D Xd Xd' Xd" Xq Xq' Xq" Tdo' Tdo" Tqo' Tqo" XI
Solid rotor with
mutual reactance H D Xd Xd' Xd" Xrm Xq Xq' Xq" Tdo' Tdo" Tqo' Tqo" XI

The classical model is used whenever the machine data is not available in detail.
The solid rotor model is used when the machine data is available. Further the
saturation model is used in the detailed studies. Solid rotor generators are suitable
for high speed applications, where the forces on the rotor are significant. The round
rotor motors are constructed in all MVA ranges. Typical machine data for various
round rotor machines are presented in Table 5.1.

The salient pole generators are used in low speed hydro generators, synchronous
condensers and synchronous motor applications. Typical machine data for various
salient pole machines are presented in Table 5.2.

Excitation system models - A general functional block diagram in Figure 5.8

indicates the generator excitation subsystems used in the electric power system
studies. These include a terminal voltage sensor, voltage regulator, an exciter,
excitation system stabilizer and in some cases a power system stabilizer. The three
common excitation systems used are dc exciters, ac exciters and static exciters. The
excitation models used in the transient stability studies were developed by IEEE
working groups [2-4].

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 5.1 Typical Machine Data for Solid Rotor Machine

Parameter 50 MVA 30 MVA 300 MVA 600 MVA

ST GT Fossil Nuclear
MVA 50 120 300 600
KV 13.8 13.8 13.8 18.0
H 6 3.3 4 3.5
D 1 1 1 1
Xd 2.13 1.65 1.3 1.9
Xd' 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.29
Xd" 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.22
Xq 1.98 1.58 1.75 1.75
Xq' 0.37 0.41 0.47 0.44
Xq" 0.18 0.18 0.23 0.22
Tdo' 5.44 5.32 4.8 6.8
Tdo" 0.02 0.03 0.35 0.035
Tqo1 0.57 0.38 1.50 0.41
Tqo" 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07
XI 0.16 0.08 0.15 0.15

Table 5.2 Typical Machine Data for Salient Pole Machines

Hydro Condenser Motors

MVA 80 130 100
KV 13.8 13.8 13.8
H 4 2.0 2.0
D 1 1 1
Xd 1.25 2.00 1.50
Xd' 0.30 0.44 0.20
Xd" 0.25 0.30 0.14
Xq 0.70 1.25 0.90
Tdo' 4.00 9.00 2.00
Tdo" 0.04 0.04 0.03
Tqo1 0.57 0.38 1.50
Tqo" 0.06 0.06 0.04
XI 0.15 0.20 0.09

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Vref

Figure 5.8 Block Diagram for the Generator Excitation System

Type 1, continuously acting regulator and exciter - The dc exciters are

associated with the older generators, may be direct acting rheostatic, rotating
amplifier and magnetic amplifier types. A block diagram of the type DC1, dc
commutator type exciter with internally acting voltage regulator is shown in Figure
5.9. This exciter utilizes a direct current generator with a commutator as the source
of excitation power. The reference voltage and the generator output voltage signal
are compared and an error voltage is produced. The error voltage is amplified using
an amplifier with a gain constant of KA and the output voltage is used to drive the
exciter field. When the exciter saturation limiter is included in the loop, the exciter
voltage is limited accordingly. The other types of dc exciters are:

Type DC 2 - DC commutator type of exciter

Type DC 3 - Non continuously acting regulator

The voltage regulator output is used to control the exciter which may be a
separately or self excited dc machine. The exciter saturation function is defined as
SE. In Figure 5.10, A and B are defined as the excitation output voltage on constant
resistance load saturation curve and the air-gap line respectively. Then the
saturation factor SE is defined as:

A-B
SE =• (5.12)
B

The exciter saturation SE using the no load curve is given by:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 EFD

Damping

Figure 5.9 Block Diagram of an IEEE Type 1 Exciter

Airgap Line No Load Saturation

__^———
*—^•«—
V Load Saturation

Figure 5.10 Exciter Saturation Curves

C-B
SE - (5.13)
B

This constant is used for the alternator rectifier exciters, because exciter regulation
effects are accounted by inclusion of synchronous reactance and commutating
reactance voltage drops in the model.

Type 2, alternator supplied rectifier exciters - This type of excitation system

uses an ac alternator and either a stationary or rotating rectifier to produce the direct
current needed for the generator field. A block diagram of the excitation system is
shown in Figure 5.11. The transfer function includes one additional time constant to
compensate for the exciter, which is not included within the damping loop. Other
characteristics of the type 2 systems are similar to type 1. Some of the other
excitation systems using the same principles are, Type AC1 with field controlled
alternator with diode rectifier excitation system. Type AC2 with high initial
response field controlled alternator rectifier excitation system. Type AC3 with field
controlled alternator rectifier excitation system with a self-excited machine. Type
AC4 with an exciter using a controlled rectifier.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Vr

Damping

Figure 5.11 Block Diagram of the Type 2 Excitation System

Type 3, static exciters with terminal potentials and current supplies - In this
type of exciter, the required dc power is supplied though transformer and rectifiers.
The ceiling voltage of this type of exciter will be very high. Otherwise, the
functions of this type of exciter are similar to type 1. Figure 5.12 shows the transfer
functions of the type 3 excitation system. The other exciters performing the same
type of functions are Type ST1, Type ST2 (a compound source rectifier exciter)
and Type ST 3 (with a controlled rectifier).

vref vs Regulator
+
l
k.
KA
r r 1 sT
+ A

Lafd Ifd

Figure 5.12 Block Diagram of the Type 3 Exciter

In addition to the above excitation models, some old systems still use the old IEEE
exciter models published in the IEEE Committee report on "Computer
Representation of Excitation Systems". These models should be converted to the
revised models if possible. Whenever the parameters of an exciter are not available,
a simplified exciter model may be used. Typical parameters for an exciter are:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 TA -10 Second TB = 1 Second K =200
TE = 0.05 Second Emin =0 Emax = 2.5 to 6

The symbols used in the excitation system modeling are:

Efd = Exciter output voltage
Ifd = Generator field current
KA = Gain of the voltage regulator
KB = Gain of the voltage regulator, second stage
KD = Demagnetizing factor
KE = Exciter constant related to self excited field
KF, KN = Excitation system control system stabilizer gains
KG = Inner loop feedback constant
KH = Exciter field current feedback gain
KL = Gain of exciter field current limit
KJ = First stage regulator gain
KP = Potential circuit gain coefficient
KR = Constant associated with regulator
KS = Power system stabilizer gain
SE = Exciter saturation function
TA, TB, TC = Voltage regulator time constants
TE = Exciter constant
TF = Excitation system stabilizer time constant
TR — Regulator input filter time constant
Tl, T3 = PSS lead compensating time constants
T2, T4 = PSS lag compensating time constants
T5 = PSS washout time constant
VA — Regulator internal voltage
VB = Available exciter voltage
VC = Compensator output voltage
VERR = Error voltage signal
VF = Excitation system stabilizer output
VN = Rate feedback input variable

Power system stabilizer - Even with the presence of automatic voltage regulators
there will be local and inter area oscillations. In order to control such oscillations,
the power system stabilizer is used. A block diagram of a power system stabilizer is
shown in Figure 5.13 which is used to provide supplementary signal to the voltage
regulator for the improvement of the oscillatory behavior. The commonly used PSS
input signals are frequency, rotor speed and accelerating power. The lead-lag
network provides the lead over the dynamic frequency range of interest for phase
compensation. Depending on the need, two or three stages of lead-lag networks are
used. The typical parameters used in a PSS stabilizer are given by:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 VS1
High Frequency Filters

Lead Lag Network •*• Lead-Lag Network

Figure 5.13 Block Diagram of a Power System Stabilizer

Kq =3 T2 T4 = 0.025 s
Tq = 1 . 0 s Tl T3 - 0.25 s Limits = ± 0.5

Typical parameters of the various IEEE excitation system models are presented
in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3 Typical Parameters of Various Excitation Systems

Const Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 DC1 DC2 DC3 AC1 AC2 AC3 ST1 ST2 ST3
TA 005 0.02 0.15 002 0.2 002 0.02 0.016 0 0.15 04
TB 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 3
TC 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TE 0.95 0.8 0.05 095 025 ] 0.8 1.66 1.33 0.5
TF 1 0.6 1 1 1.03 1 0.5
TF1 1 1 1
TF2 0
TR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRH
KA 400 400 120 400 10 400 250 1200 250 120 7.2
KB 100
KC 0.2 0.17 0 0 0 7 1.1
KD 0.38 0.47 0
KE -017 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1
KF 003 004 0.03 0.03 0.105 003 003 0.147 0 002
KG 1
KH 0.5
Kl 0 0 4.8
KJ 200
KL 1
KLV 1
KN 0051
KP 0 1.19 4.36
KR 60
KV 0.05
El 3.1 3.1 3.38 3.75 3.8 5 3.5 2.49
SE(E1) 0112 0.112 0.22 0.083 0.068 0.03 0.04 0.046
E2 4 13 4.13 4.5 5 45 6.64 4.4 3.322
SE(E2) 0.225 0225 0.95 0.233 0.267 0.1 0.2 0 3 7 1
VRMIN -3.5 -7.5 -12 -3.5 -1 0 -6.6 -13.1 -7.48 -1.2 0
VRMAX 35 73 1.2 35 1 5.7 7.3 145 9.35 12 1
VAMIN -5.82 -1.05
VAMAX 5.82 1.05
VIM IN -9999 -0.2
V1MAX -9999 0.2
VLR 7.08
VLV 0.5
VGMAX 6.37
EFDMAX 1.715 4.5 8.23

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Turbine governor data - The turbine governor models are used to give
representations of the effects of the power plants on power system stability. The
speed governing mechanisms provide damping during the disturbances and helps to
improve the stability. A block diagram is presented in Figure 5.14 to show the
relation between the turbine governor to the generator. The following basic turbine
governor models are available [4]:

• Non-reheat steam turbine.

• Tandem compound single reheat.
• Tandem-compound double reheat.
• Cross-compound single reheat (HP, LP shaft and LP shaft).
• Cross-compound single reheat (HP, IP shaft and LP shaft).
• Hydro turbines.
• Gas turbines.
• Diesel engines.

All single shaft governor and prime mover characteristics can be modeled using the
block diagram shown in Figure 5.15. In this general case, any of the poles or zeros
of the gate or valve servo or the steam or water supply may be zero. Because of the
limiter between the servo and the energy system transfer functions, each of them
must be realizable. Typical governing system models and data are presented in
References [4,5]. The most common type of speed-governing system for steam and
hydro turbines is mechanical-hydraulic control and electro-hydraulic control. If the
governor parameters are not readily available, then typical data can be used. Some
of the typical models used for steam turbine units and the parameters are available
in Reference [4].

Speed
Turbine Governor Inertia

Speed Control
Speed Governor • —
Mechanism
Mechanical
Power
Speed Governing System

Figure 5.14 Speed Governor and Turbine Relation to Generator

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Gatecr V\feteror3eem
Shaft Rwer
System Dynarrics

Shaft Fbwer

AJX

Figure 5.15 Single Shaft Governor and Energy Systems

Hydro units - The typical turbine governor models suitable for the hydro
generators are discussed in Reference [4]. Depending on the level of detail needed
several models are available for the hydro units. Typical parameters of the hydraulic
turbine units are listed in Table 5.4.

Table 5.4 Typical Parameters of the Hydraulic Turbine Governors

Parameter Typical Value Range

TR (second) 5 2.5-25.0
TG (second) 0.3 0.2 - 0.40
TP (second) 0.04 0.03 - 0.05
DELTA 0.3 0.2- 1.0
SIGMA 0.05 0.03 - 0.06

Typically, TR - 5 TW and delta = 2.5 TW/2H; where H is the inertia constant of

the turbine generator on machine MVA base.

Induction motor model - The electrical and mechanical characteristics of the

induction machines are modeled and used in the system dynamic performance study
[7]. The model parameters are derived from the manufacturer's data. The induction
motor models are used for large machines in the motor starting study, voltage
recovery study and stability analysis. Typical data for the motors are presented in
Table 5.5.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 5.5 Typical Model Parameters of Double Cage Induction Motors
(Machine parameters on the machine kVA base)

Parameter 20 kVA 99.1 kVA 402 kVA

H, Second 0.5 0.44 0.696

RA, P.U. 0.02 0.02 0.008
LA, P.U. 0.015 0.025 0.080
LM, P.U. 2.7 2.7 3.6
Rl.P.U. 0.02 0.015 0.03
LI, P.U. 0.15 0.04 0.07
R2, P.U. 0.015 0.015 0.015
L2, P.U. 0.05 0.13 0.08

Load models - The bus voltage and the frequency are not constant during system
disturbances. Therefore, the load models can have significant effects on the time or
frequency domain results. Then the real and reactive power components of the load
can be represented by the following equations:

P - (A + B V + C V2)

Q = (D + EV + F V 2 )

Where the constants A through F are selected based on the type of load such as
residential, industrial, or agricultural. The parameter V is the per unit voltage. In the
stability analysis the change in the load due to frequency change is very small
compared to the effects due to the voltage. Therefore, after neglecting the frequency
effects, the load can be expressed as [7]:

Constant impedance type, P = C V2, Q - F V2

Constant current type, P = BV, Q = EV
Constant MVA type, P = A, Q = D

The relation between the load MVA and the various types of load are shown in
Figure 5.16. In the power flow analysis, the constant MVA load model is used. In
the power system stability analysis, the constant current model is usually used.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 140
130
« 120
110 MVA .
= 100
90

80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115

Voltage, Percentage

Figure 5.16 Relation Between the Load MVA and the Bus Voltage

The generator, exciter and the governor models discussed are based on the IEEE
models. Every software has specific models based on the requirement and the
user has to follow the program instructions accordingly.

5.6 SIMULATION CONSIDERATIONS

The transient stability analysis using a personal computer-based program requires

all the necessary data. Some of the data-related issues are discussed below.

Numerical methods for the solution of time domain solutions - The following
analytical approaches are used in the dynamic analysis. The specific approach and
the usefulness are discussed below.

Direct solution through differential equations - The behavior of the dynamic

systems can be expressed by differential equations using the system variables. The
differential equations can be solved using the classical techniques in closed form
equations. Sometimes analog computers can be used to solve these equations. The
digital computer approach can be used to obtain both time and frequency domain
solutions. Such approaches are suitable for small systems and are difficult to use for
large-scale problems.

Laplace transforms - By this approach, the differential equations can be

transformed to s-domain, partial fractions, inverse Laplace transform and then to
time domain solution. This approach is suitable for linear differential equations and

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 is not suitable for large-scale problems.

Transfer functions - The system can be expressed into differential equations and
the transfer functions can be identified. Again such an approach is suitable for small
networks.

Block diagrams - The system can be identified into small block diagrams and can
be analyzed. For large-scale networks such a procedure is time-consuming and
difficult to follow.

Feedback control system - Using the state variable approach, the components can
be identified with suitable transfer functions. Then the data for the components can
be identified for each of the system components.

Eigenvalue analysis - The differential equations can be used to solve for the
eigenvalues and the eigenvectors. Depending on the location of the roots, the
stability of the system can be assessed. For large-scale problems this requires
careful consideration. For small networks, this approach is suitable and amount of
graphical support requirement is less.

Digital computer solution approach - The differential equations can be solved by

making use of the numerical techniques. The solution technique can be based on
Runge-Kutta method or similar approach. Since the microcomputers are equipped
with significant amount of fixed and virtual memory, such an approach is very
commonly used in the transient stability analysis. The power flow and the stability
programs are capable of handling various bus numbers specified by the user.

Fault type and locations - The various types of faults and the location of the
faults are needed in identifying the dynamic stability case list. Some of the faults
to be used in the selection of the case list are:

• Three-phase line faults leading to single circuit outage.

• Three-phase bus faults leading to the loss of a bus.
• Three-phase bus faults leading to loss of a generator.
• Faults leading to the major line overloading.
• Faults leading to voltage contingencies.
• Faults leading to islanded operation of the system.
• Faults leading to the outage of a major transmission line with a large generator
connected to the system through a weak transmission line.

When a large system is given, these cases are not easy to identify when hundreds of
buses and lines are present. Also, a large number of cases will arise if the above

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 procedure is used to prepare a case list. Further, when a systematic approach is used
there will be several cases repeating under various selection criteria. Therefore,
there is a need to limit the number of cases within reasonable bounds and perform
an assessment on the selected stability cases.

Fault clearing times - The following typical fault clearing times are used.
Primary fault clearing time — 6 cycles
Backup fault clearing time =16 cycles
The customer specifications for fault clearing are always valuable data.

Simulation of a three-phase fault -The three-phase bolted fault is the most

severe type of fault used for the assessment of the transient stability. The
sequence of events used in the simulation as shown in Figure 5.17 are:

• Before fault up to 0.1 second.

• Place a three-phase fault at the desired bus at 0.1 second.
• The fault is placed for 6 cycles (duration of 0.1 second).
• Fault is cleared at 0.2 second.
• The after fault effects are calculated until 5 seconds.

Before Fault During Fault After Fault Clearing

0 01 0.2 5
Time, second *•

Figure 5.17 Events in a Three-Phase Fault in the Transient Stability Analysis

Simulation of the loss of a generator - The loss of a generator unit in a power

system is a very severe type of fault and hence the stability assessment is necessary.
The loss of generation can be due to the loss of field, over voltage tripping, under
voltage tripping or due to some other fault. The transient stability analysis involves
running the simulation before and after the fault. In this case, there is no simulation
during the fault, since the loss of the unit is momentary. In the case of a bus fault,
the generator is outaged after the normal or backup fault clearing operation.

Backup fault clearing - If the primary relaying fails to clear a fault, then the
backup fault clearing is performed by the appropriate backup relay. In such a
condition, the fault is present in the power system for longer time duration and
possibility to go into the unstable operation is higher. In such cases, sometimes the
critical fault clearing times are studied. Critical fault clearing time is the time at
power system will become unstable, if the fault is not cleared.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Data for stability analysis - As outlined above, the stability data have to be
defined using suitable models for the generator, exciter, turbine-governor, induction
motors, loads and other important components. The transmission line, cables and
the source data are generally represented by positive sequence impedance.

Parameters to be monitored - In order to assess the transient stability of the

system, several parameters can be monitored. Some of the important parameters to
be monitored are:

• Rotor angle.
• Bus voltage.
• Bus frequency deviation.
• Generator field voltage.
• Generator field current.
• Generator power.
• Generator reactive power.
• Generator rotor speed.
• Branch flow (P, Q and MVA).

The rotor angles and the voltages are very important parameters for assessing the
stability of the generator and the system.

Example 5.2 - Consider the IEEE six bus power flow case given in Reference
[8]. A one-line diagram of the system is shown in Figure 5.18. The system
contains six buses, four generators, seven branches and five loads. The bus data,
branch data and the generator data are given in Chapter 3. The load flow analysis
is performed for this system in Chapter 3. Now consider the generator and exciter
dynamics data for the power system components. The generator dynamics data
are assumed to be of the same type, except for the H constants. An example
printout of the generator data and the exciter are given in List 5.1. The load is
modeled using constant MVA in the power flow analysis. The load is converted
into constant current load for the stability analysis.

Solution - The following two case studies are presented to demonstate the time
domain analysis of the stability. The study was performed using the PTI's PSS/E
program [10].

• Loss of generator at bus 4, no automatic voltage regulator.

• Loss of generator at bus 4, with automatic voltage regulator.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 GENERATOR 1 AT BUS 1 13.8 KV

MBASE ZSOURCE
200.0 0.00000+J 0.12000

T'DO T''DO T'QO T''QO H DAMP XD XQ

6.00 0.060 0.20 0.050 4.00 2.00 1.8000 1.7500

X'D X'Q X''D XL S(l.O) S(1.2)

0.6000 0.8000 0.2050 0.150 0.0900 0.3800

EXCITER AT BUS 1 13.8 KV

TA/TB TB K TE EMIN EMAX

0.100 10.000 100.0 0.100 0.00 4.00

List 5.1 Example Generator and Exciter Data at Bus 1

(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc, Output from PSS/E Program)

Since this is a very small system, severe fault such as a three-phase bus fault may
lead to the entire system becoming unstable. Therefore, a fault condition is chosen
with a loss of 60 MW generation out of the total of 690 MW. The following steps
are involved in the simulation:

• Read the dynamic data.

• Read the required channel data for the time domain plots.
• Link the required library of data.
• Run the dynamics from 0.0 seconds to 0.1 second, under pre-fault condition.
• Introduce the fault (loss of generator 4).
• Run the simulation up to 5 seconds.
• Plot the time domain results using a graphics program.

Loss of generator at bus 4, no automatic voltage regulator - This case was

simulated in order to show how the system will perform without an automatic
voltage regulator. The generator rotor angle of the generator at bus 5 and the
voltage at bus 2 are plotted in Figure 5.19. It can be seen that the rotor angle is
changing very rapidly and is unstable. In a similar manner, the bus voltage falls
below the nominal value and is oscillatory.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Bus3 Bus2

Bus4 Bus6
Bus5
Gen4
= Load

Figure 5.18 IEEE Six Bus System used in the Example

SPT. PUG OS

Figure 5.19 Rotor Angle (the falling curve) and the Voltage Plots (the oscillatory
curve) without Automatic Voltage Regulator
(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc, Output from PSS/E Program)

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Loss of generator at bus 4, with automatic voltage regulator - In order to
show the effect of the automatic voltage regulator, a regulator with a gain of 400
is introduced. The time domain simulation is performed as above. The generator
rotor angle at bus 5 and the voltage of bus 2 are plotted as before and is shown in
Figure 5.20. It can be seen that the generator rotor angle oscillations decay fast
and settle. Also, the bus voltage is low during the fault and recovers to the
nominal value after removing the fault.

Figure 5.20 Rotor Angle and the Voltage Plots with Automatic Voltage Regulator
(Courtesy of Power Technologies, Inc, Output from PSS/E Program)

As indicated above, several types of faults can be simulated and the system stability
can be assessed. Also, the effect of any parameter can be studied using the time
domain analysis.

5.7 CONCLUSIONS

The theory of steady state stability and transient stability is presented in the Chapter.
The importance of the swing equation in assessing the system stability is discussed.
The generator models, exciter models, governor models, induction motor models
and load models suitable for power system stability analysis are discussed. Typical
data for various models are indicated. The IEEE six-bus system is used to
demonstrate the unstable and stable conditions using a practical stability program.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 PROBLEMS

1. What are the two types of stability encountered in power systems? If the
system is oscillatory, then under what category can this be analyzed?

2. There are two small power systems with HI and H2 values of 4.0 and 5.0
respectively. The reactance of the tie line interconnecting the areas is 0.6 P.U.
The voltage El and E2 are 1.03 P.U and 1.02 P.U respectively. The load angle
is 15 degrees. Calculate the frequency of inter area oscillation.

3. A small power system X is connected through a tie line with a reactance of 0.5
P.U. to another power system Y. If there is a sudden loss of load of 0.1 P.U. on
100 MVA base, calculate the power variation through the tie line. Calculate the
frequency of oscillation in the tie line during the disturbance. The voltages in
the X and Y systems are 1.0 P.U. and 1.01 P.U. respectively. Use a 100 MVA
base.

4. There are two generators operating under identical conditions delivering the
same P at Vt =1.02 P.U. One machine is operating at 0.85 lagging power factor
and the other machine is operating at 0.85 leading power factor. If there is
three-phase fault at the terminal of the machine, then discuss the stability
margin.

5. Consider a generator with specifications 300 MVA, 13.8 kV, 0.85 power
factor and 3,600 rpm. The moment of inertia of the turbine generator is
600,000 Ib-ft . Calculate the inertia constant H on the generator MVA base and
at 100 MVA base. When the unit is delivering 120 MW, a three-phase fault
occurs. Calculate the speed of the generator unit at 10 seconds, if the over
speed relay did not trip the unit out of service.

6. Discuss the following terms from the power system stability point of view.

Unstable operating point in Figure 5.3 Accelerating power

Critical fault clearing time H constant
Voltage collapse Synchronizing power
Extreme contingency cases Design requirement cases
Infinite bus Exciter

7. What are the different approaches available for solving the stability
problems? Compare the different techniques and recommend the most
efficient approach.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 REFERENCES

1. R. T. Byerly and E. W. Kimbark, Stability of Large Electric Power

Systems, IEEE Press, 1974.

2. "Computer Representation of Excitation Systems," IEEE Committee

Report, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-
87, June 1968, pp. 1460-1464.

3. "Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies," IEEE

Committee Report, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,
Vol. PAS-100, No. 2, February 1981, pp. 494-509.

4. "Dynamic Models for Steam and Hydro Turbines in Power System

Studies," IEEE Committee Paper, IEEE Transactions on Power
Apparatus and Systems, November/December 1973.

5. D. G. Ramesy and J. W. Skooglund, "Detailed Hydro Governor

Representation for System Stability Studies," IEEE Transactions on
Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-80, No. 1, January 1970, pp.
106-111.

6. D. G. Ramesy and R. T. Byerly, "Dynamic Simulation of Interconnected

Systems," IEEE Pica Conference Paper, 1967.

7. M. H. Kent, W. R. Schmus, F. A. McGrackin and L.M.Wheelr, "Dynamic

Modeling of Loads in Stability Studies," IEEE Transactions on Power
Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-88, May 1969.

8. R. Billington and S. S. Sachdeva, "Real and Reactive Power Optimization

by Sub Optimal Techniques," IEEE PES Summer Meeting, Oregon, July
1971,Paper71TP596-PWR(6busdata).

9. "Procedures for the Exchange of Power Plant and Load Data for
Synchronous Stability Studies," IEEE Committee Paper, IEEE
Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-100, No. 7,
July 1981, pp. 3229-3242.

10. Power System Simulator/Engineering (PSS/E) Program, Power

Technologies, Inc., Schenectady, New York,

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 6
MOTOR STARTING STUDIES

6.1 INTRODUCTION

A large number of induction motors are used in industrial facilities to perform

various drive applications. Starting large induction motors on line can cause
severe disturbance to the motor, to the load and to the other power system loads
connected close to the motor. All the polyphase induction motors can be
classified into squirrel cage and wound rotor type. The wound rotor induction
motors are suitable for loads requiring high starting torque with reduced starting
currents. The squirrel cage induction motors are robust and require very little
maintenance during normal operating conditions. Therefore, many of the
industrial drives are equipped with squirrel cage induction motors. The squirrel
cage induction motors are classified by the National Manufacturers Association
(NEMA) based on the torque speed characteristics as design A, B, C or D.
Recently, the high efficiency motors are being classified as Design E motors.
The speed torque characteristics of all the four designs are presented in Figure
6.1. Some of the approaches in the application of these motors are presented
below.

Design A motors usually have low rotor resistance, single cage type with
excellent running characteristics. The starting current is high with moderate
starting torque. Typical loads are fans, blowers and pumps.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 • • • • Design B
- - —Design A
Design C
Design D

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

Speed, P.U.

Figure 6.1 Torque Speed Characteristics of Design A, B, C and D Motors

Design B motors are of the double cage type with high rotor resistance and are used
for full voltage starting. These motors have about the same starting torque as design
A, but somewhat lower performance at the operating point, and the same
applications as design A. This is the most commonly used squirrel cage motor.

Design C motors are also double cage design with higher rotor resistance than
design B, with better starting torque, drawing relatively low starting current. The
applications are constant speed loads such as conveyors and crushers.

Design D motors have higher starting torque than all the squirrel cage motors using
a high rotor resistance. They have low efficiency and are used for high inertia loads
such as die-stamping machines, punch presses and shears.

Design E motors are energy efficient and are not available widely. These motors
are intended to provide better efficiency than Design B motors. A 200-hp design E
motor has an efficiency of 95.8% as opposed to 95% efficiency for a standard
motor. The difference is greater for smaller motors. Also, the locked rotor current
of Design E motors are much higher than standard designs. Such a design will result
in a larger voltage drop during motor starting.

The online starting of any of these motors draws significant starting current
producing voltage drop. Therefore, some of the motors are provided with starters
and online starting requires careful consideration.

Full voltage starting is most commonly used because of its simplicity and low cost.
In this case the motor is connected to the power system through a circuit breaker.
With this method, the inrush current drawn from the line, the sudden application of

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 torque to the load and the mechanical stresses produced on the motor windings will
be significant. However, most power systems can supply the inrush current without
producing appreciable voltage drop for starting small and medium size motors.
Also, in drive applications, sudden load torque may not produce any mechanical
damage in most cases. Maximum torque is available to the load, although the
reduction in motor torque produced by the voltage drop at the motor terminals must
be considered in specifying the torque required. Presently, the motor end windings
are braced and can withstand stresses produced by the inrush current when started
on full voltage.

A frequent problem has been failure to start when the motor coupled to its load is
energized for the first time. Typically the motor appears to start smoothly, then is
tripped off line by relay action before it reaches full speed. When the starting time is
prolonged enough to exceed the permissible locked rotor time, the relay can operate
even though its time current curve is at all points above the motor starting curve.
Some of the effects of starting a large motor are presented below.

Motor terminal voltage - During the starting, the motor terminal voltage should
be maintained at approximately 80% of the rated voltage for type B motors having a
standard 150% starting torque at full voltage with a constant torque load applied. A
81.6% rated voltage will develop a torque T = 0.8162 x 150% = 100%. Also, in
every case the starting time has to be evaluated for the 11 damage limit of the motor.

Effect of motor starting on other running motors - Motors that are running
normally on the system will slow down in response to the voltage drop occurring
when a large motor is started. The running machines must be able to reaccelerate
once the machine being started reaches the operating speed. If the voltage drop is
very severe, the loading on the running machines may exceed the breakdown torque
at the reduced voltage. The decelerating machines may impose heavy current
demand to produce excessive voltage drop.

Heavy starting currents - In the case of design B motors, the pullout torque is
200% of the rated torque. If the motor terminal voltage falls below 71% of the
rated voltage the motor may stall. This is based on the assumption that the
developed torque is proportional to V . If other than design B motors are used on
the system, a similar criterion can be established to evaluate re-acceleration
following a motor starting.

Flicker - Power system loads such as computer equipment, power electronic

equipment and sensitive control devices may be affected during motor starting.
There is a wide variation in the magnitude of the voltage drop by electronic
equipment. Voltage fluctuations may also cause objectionable light flicker in

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 domestic applications. The flicker curves and the allowed flicker levels are
discussed in detail in Chapter 8. For various new electronic equipment, the
allowable voltage drop data has to be obtained from the manufacturer.

Effect on control devices - The control devices are not required to pick up at
voltages below 5% of the rated name plate value. The dc control devices can
operate at 80% of the rated voltage. Critical control operations can therefore
encounter difficulty during the motor starting period if the voltage drop is excessive.
The actual drop out voltage of industrial contactors is 60% - 70% of the rated
system voltage.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

The online switching device can be a molded case circuit breaker, or oil-immersed
circuit breaker, or air break circuit breaker, either held closed magnetically or
latched in. For a given rating, the oil-immersed circuit breaker has a lower initial
cost but requires greater maintenance. For some applications the choice of the
circuit breaker is determined by the interrupting rating of the system.

According to the IEEE Standard 399 a motor starting study should be performed if
the motor horse-power exceeds approximately 30% of the supply transformer base
kVA rating if no generators are present. For smaller horse power motors, a study is
needed depending on the daily fluctuation of nominal voltage, size and length of the
cable, load rating, regulation of the supply voltage, transformer impedance and tap
ratio, load torque and motor torque.

If generation is present and no other sources are involved, a study is required if the
motor horse-power exceeds 10% to 15% of the generator kVA rating. The
acceptable minimum voltages under various operating conditions are listed in Table
6.1.
Table 6.1 The Acceptable Voltage Levels During Motor Starting

Description Allowable Voltage, % Rated

Acceptable system voltage (95% - 105%)
Acceptable voltage for motor starting 85% [2]
At the starting motor terminal 80% [ 1 ]
At the terminals of other motors 71 %
AC contactor pick up voltage 85%
DC contactor pick up voltage 80%
Contactor drop out voltage (60 - 70)%
Solid state control devices 90%
Noticeable flicker 3% change

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The above criteria can be used to evaluate the voltage drop due to motor starting in
a power system.

6.3 STARTING METHODS

If a normal supply voltage is applied to an induction motor at standstill, the starting

current will be on the order of 6 times the rated current. The starting torque is also
limited and can be improved by inserting a resistance in the rotor circuit in the case
of slip ring motors. However, there is need to limit the inrush current during the
starting. There are several starting methods used for large motors.

Series impedance starting - A resistance or reactance can be used in series with

the motor winding during starting. Then by using a contactor, the series impedance
can be short circuited. If a series reactance is used in the starting, the power factor
will be poor and produce significant disturbance in the line. If a series resistance is
used, then the power factor will be better, but the losses in the resistance will be
high. Standard reactors are available to limit the starting voltages at the motor
terminal to 50%, 75% and 90% of the terminal voltage at the instant of starting.
When starting with a series reactance the kVA drawn from the supply is reduced
directly proportional to the applied voltage and the motor torque is reduced
proportional to the square of the voltage. If x is the fraction of the voltage reduced
by the series impedance, then the starting current and the torque are given by:
1st = x Isc (6.1)
2 „,
Tst = x Tsc (6.2)

fxl ^ ^1
Tst (1st}2 , sc 2 sc
-X sf (6.3)
Tf v I f yJ
V v
If y V
If
J

Using the above relations, the starting current and the starting torque can be
evaluated if the full load current, short circuit current, slip at the rated load, the full
load torque and the fraction of the voltage applied are known.

Auto-transformer starting - In this method, a reduced voltage is applied to the

motor using an auto-transformer and the voltage is increased to the nominal value
after the starting. With auto-transformer starting, the acceleration time of the motor
is longer, if a constant torque is produced during the starting. Further, the reactance
of the auto-transformer is in parallel with the motor. In the case of an auto-
transformer starting, if a tapping of transformation x is used then the phase voltage
across the motor is (x VA/3). With the auto-transformer starter the equations (6.1)
through (6.3) can be used.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Wye/delta starter - For small and medium size motors, the wye/delta starter can be
used. The stator winding is connected in wye during the starting and in delta for the
running. This starter is the simplest form of mechanical equipment and is suitable
for small and medium size motors.

Shunt capacitors to reduce the starting current - The shunt capacitors can be
used across the motor terminals to reduce the reactive component of the current
during the starting. Experimental results on a 2-hp, 220 V, 7 A, 3,600 rpm, wye
connected, three-phase induction motor show significant reduction in the line
currents. The starting currents without and with shunt capacitors are listed in Table
6.2.

Table 6.2 Starting Currents Without and With Shunt Capacitors

Case Description Current, A

Motor without shunt capacitors 50.0 A
Motor with 240 MFD shunt capacitors 34.5 A
Motor with 480 MFD shunt capacitors 31.0 A

The shunt capacitors can cause ferroresonance when interacting with the magnetic
circuit of the induction motors. Therefore, the shunt capacitors has to be switched
off as soon as the starting is completed. However, switching off the shunt capacitors
requires further consideration from the transient recovery voltage point of view.

Example 6.1 - Find the percentage of tapping required on an auto-transformer to

start an induction motor against 1/3 of the full load torque. The short circuit current
with a normal voltage is 6 times the full load current and the full load slip is 3%.
T J
st 1 st
Solution- — =~ — = 6 sf =0.03
3 f
Tf If

T ( ^2
st 2 I Isc
= X Sj
T
f
1
2 2
- = x (6) (0.03)
3
Solving for x, the required transformer tapping, x = 0.56 or 56%

Example 6.2 - A three-phase, 6-pole, 60 Hz induction motor takes 60 A at the full

load and runs at 1160 rpm to develop the rated torque. The starting current at rated
voltage is 300 A. Calculate the starting torque for online and wye/delta starting.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Solution- Isc = 300A, If =60 A
f
Xst Isc
Sf for online starting
Tf fi
v /
1200 -1160 \
- 0.033
1 ^ 1200 )
T f \^
-§L = -?_ 0.033 = 0.825
T,-
^ Vv 60 yJ

If a wye/delta starter is used,

sf = I - II ^^ I 0.033 = 0.275

6.4 SYSTEM DATA

The electrical system is represented by suitable impedance values. Then the

impedance values are converted to a common base. The data-related issues for the
motor starting in a power system are presented below.

Source data - The utility source is represented by a per unit impedance which is
equivalent to the short circuit MVA level available from the utility at the point of
common coupling. The minimum capacity of the source is used in the short circuit
impedance calculations. The source impedance data is usually provided by the
utility. Whenever the exact data is not available, typical generator data can be used.

Transmission lines - The transmission lines are represented by positive and zero
sequence impedances. The approach to calculate the transmission line constants and
typical values are presented in Chapter 2.

Cable data - The cable impedances are presented by the positive and zero sequence
impedance values. The calculation procedure is discussed in Chapter 2.

Transformer impedance - The impedances given in percentage on the self-cooled

transformer kVA rating are converted to per unit on the study bases. Typical
impedances of two winding transformers are presented in Chapter 4. Typical X/R
ratio of transformers are available in IEEE standard C37.010. For the calculation of
the one line to ground fault short circuit currents, the zero sequence connection
diagrams for certain transformers are required. The equivalent zero sequence
circuits for three-legged, core type transformers need special considerations.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 R2(1-s)/s

Figure 6.2 Equivalent Circuit of Single Cage Induction Motor

Induction motors -The rotor design of the induction motor is such that there is
significant dependence of the rotor resistance on the motor speed. The effect must
be included in any motor model intended for the starting analysis. A typical
equivalent circuit used to represent the single cage induction motor is shown in
Figure 6.2. Rl and R2 are stator and rotor resistances per phase. XI and X2 are the
stator and rotor leakage reactance per phase respectively. Xm is the magnetizing
reactance/phase.

The motor data required for the simulation of starting characteristics are the horse
power rating, rated voltage, synchronous speed, moment of inertia of the rotating
parts, type of the motor (single cage or double cage) and locked rotor code. The
squirrel cage rotor windings are designed to provide proper running performance as
well as the starting duties. In order to limit the starting kVA to meet the design
specifications, NEMA has established starting kVA standards, each identified by a
code letter which is stamped on the motor name plate. The value is expressed in
kVA/hp. The recommended kVA/hp values are listed in Table 6.3.

Table 6.3 Locked Rotor Code of Induction Motors

Code KVA/hD Code KVA/ho

A 0.0-3.14 L 9.0-9.99
B 3.15-3.54 M 10.0- 11.19
C 3.55-3.99 N 11.2- 12.49
D 4.0-4.49 P 12.5-13.99
E 4.5-4.99 R 14.0- 15.99
F 5.0-5.59 S 16.0- 17.99
G 5.6-6.29 T 18.0- 19.99
H 6.3-7.09 U 20.0-22.39
J 7.1 -7.99 V 22.4 - and up
K 8.0-8.99

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The commonly used design B motors belong to code F and the nominal kVA/hp is
5.5. The inertia constant of the rotating parts (H in kW-sec/kVA) can be calculated
using the equation (6.4) for the FPS system:
0.231xlO~ 6 (wk) 2 RPM 2
H = (6.4)
kVA
Where wk = Moment of inertia of the machine and load, Ib-ft
RPM = Synchronous speed

Usually the motor ratings are expressed in horsepower and there is a need to
convert the same into kVA rating. The kVA and the horse-power relation is given
by:

(hp) (0.746)
KVA = (6.5)
(PF) (Efficiency)

The power factor of the motor during starting is required and the following typical
values can be used if the data is not readily available.

• Under 1,000-hp, 0.20.

• Above 1,000-hp, 0.15.

The motor models are available in graphical form either in metric or FPS units.
Example motor data are shown in Table 6.4.

Table 6.4 Example Motor Model Suitable for Motor Starting Analysis
Hp = 1000 Voltage = 4.160 kV Current = 117 A Speed = 1800 RPM
Power factor = 0.90 Efficiency = 0.98 Wk 2 = 7500 Ib-ft
Speed, P.U. Torque, P.U. Current, P.U. Power Factor
0.0 1.5 6.2 0.22
0.1 1.45 6.1 0.22
0.2 1.38 6.1 0.23
0.3 1.34 6.0 0.24
0.4 1.39 5.9 0.25
0.5 1.47 5.8 0.26
0.6 1.63 5.5 0.27
0.7 1.86 5.2 0.29
0.8 2.20 4.8 0.36
0.9 2.25 4.2 0.40
0.95 1.65 3.2 0.72
0.975 1.25 2.0 0.93
1.0 0.0 0.2 0.10

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Load model - Usually the load model is presented in graphical form or in equation
form. The data includes a model name, model type (graphical or equation), moment
of inertia of the load and the torque speed characteristics of the load. The models
are generally available for loads such as fans, pumps, compressors, blowers and
motor generator set. An example graphical model for a load is given in Table 6.5.

Table 6.5 Example Load Model

Load Model Load = Fan KW = 800 Speed =1.800 RPM

Speed, P.U. Torque, P.U.

0.0 0.0
0.1 0.01
0.2 0.05
0.3 0.10
0.4 0.15
0.5 0.25
0.6 0.36
0.7 0.48
0.8 0.65
0.9 0.78
0.95 0.92

Motor switching data - During the simulation, the motor has be switched on at a
suitable time. This can be performed using a time-dependent switch or voltage-
dependent switch. For the time domain simulations, a time-dependent switch is
used.

Controller data - The motor starting involves the direct switching or switching
through a suitable control device such as:

Auto-transformer switching Part-winding starting

Wye-delta starter Shunt capacitor starting
Series reactance or resistance Solid state starters

The control function may be voltage, speed or time. Depending upon the program
capability these functions are implemented.

Synchronous machines - A synchronous machine is represented by the sub-

transient direct axis reactance. Typical reactance values for various synchronous
machines are presented in Chapter 4.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 6.5 VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS

There are several approaches available to calculate the voltage drops in the feeder
circuits. The impedance method, the short circuit kVA method, the (R + j X)
method and the load flow solution using computer-aided analysis are some of the
commonly used methods. The technique involved in various approaches is
discussed below. The computer-aided approach is discussed in a later section.

The impedance method - In this approach, the impedance of various lines and the
transformers are calculated using the equation:
X
kVr2
Z(Ohms) = (6.6)
MVA
J
The impedance of a line in one kV (kVl) to another kV (kV2) is converted using
the equation:
s\

ZV2(Ohms) = ( — ZV1 (6.7)

The impedance of the load is calculated using the equation:

/ o
kV2
Zload(Ohms) = (6.8)
MVA
V J
Then the total impedance and the voltage drop are calculated using the equation:
I Motor Impedance ]
% Voltage drop = \\ \ xlOO (69)
[ Total Impedance J
It can be seen that the phase angles are neglected in these calculations and hence the
solution is approximate.

Short circuit kVA method - The short circuit kVA of the system at the motor
terminals is calculated using the formula:
100 (kV Abase)
KVAsc = (6JO)
— z%—
Usually the motor short circuit rating can be calculated from the name plate data.
Then the voltage drop at the terminal during the motor starting is given by:

100 (Motor Short Circuit kVA)

% Voltage Drop = v(611)
Motor Short Circuit kVA +KVAsc ' '

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 The (R + j X) method - In this method, all the impedance values are calculated and
added using the vectors. The phase angles are not neglected. Finally the absolute
impedance values and the voltage drop are calculated using the equation (6.9). This
approach is more accurate since the phase angles are taken into account.

6.5.1 Effect of Initial Conditions

The initial conditions of power system operation have influence on the voltage
drops calculated. The initial conditions may be due to the nature of the existing load
in adjacent buses, running motors and initial bus voltages.

Type of load - The presence of constant impedance loads such as lights, resistors,
reactors and lightly loaded motors does not have significant influence on the
calculated voltage drop. Also, the constant current loads have a combination of the
above loads plus loaded motors do not affect the voltage drop calculations.
However, fully loaded motors will have certain influence on the calculated voltage
drops.

Loaded motors at unity power factor - If there are large number of fully loaded
induction motors or synchronous motors at unity power factor, then the operation of
these motors will have significant effect on the calculated voltage drop. An
approximate mathematical relation can be presented for the modified voltage drop
(Vm) as:
0.65 x Initial kVA I
Vm = x Voltage Drop with no Initial Load (6.12)
Generator kVA J
The application of this must be done carefully, if the calculated voltage drop is over
30%. Under such conditions, the running motors will stall drawing significant
current and additional voltage drop. Also, the contactor may drop isolating the
motors from service.

Leading power factor motor loads - In some cases synchronous motors may be
running with leading power factor. In such cases, the reactive power supplied from
the source produces a smaller voltage drop. The mathematical relation representing
such a condition is given by:

100 (Motor Short Circuit kV A - Leading PF kV A)

% Voltage Drop - —(613)
Motor Short Circuit kVA + KVAsc - Leading PF kVA v ' '
Effect of initial bus voltage - In some cases it is possible that the actual bus
voltage is less than the expected 1.0 P.U voltage. If the source voltage is always on
the higher side of the nominal voltage, then the available terminal voltage at the
motor will be higher.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 6.6 CALCULATION OF ACCELERATION TIME

The acceleration time of the motor shaft during starting can be calculated by solving
the equation of motion given by:

1 T dco

The time required to accelerate from the speed fo\ to &>2 is:

tm-) J d(D
t =ft- (6.15)
(T-T1)
In order to find the value of this integral, it is necessary to know the motor torque
(T) and the load torque (Tl) as a function of speed. In the simplest case, when the
motor torque and the load torque are constant, then:

( 0)2 ~col)
A? = JT —--— (6.16)
(T-T1)

w 2?rN
=-- <6-17>
The total inertia J is represented by Wk . Simplifying the equation (6.16) using
these terms,

At = - (6.18)
308(T-T1)

During the starting of a motor, the terminal voltage will drop and the corresponding
torque will be less. Therefore, suitable correction factor has to be applied to account
for the torque reduction. The motor terminal voltage and the accelerating torque are
given by :

Input kVA
Motor terminal voltage = V 1- (6.19)
Input kVA + KVAsc

Where KVAsc is the short circuit rating of the source. The net motor torque (Tr)
can be calculated by:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Tr = T [V in per unit]" (6.20)

The net accelerating torque is the difference between the resultant motor toque and
the load torque. In order to improve the accuracy of the calculated acceleration
time, a reduced time step is required. The calculation procedure is explained using
an example.

Example 6.3 - Consider a 500-hp, 460 V, 1170 rpm, 3 phase induction motor for
an application with torque speed characteristics as shown in Table 6.6. The
combined inertia of the motor shaft and the load is 3,500 Ibs-ft . The short circuit
kVA of the system is 35,000 kVA. The input to the motor at rated load is 450 kVA.
Calculate the acceleration time in seconds using a step-by-step approach.

Table 6.6 The Speed Torque Characteristics of the Motor and Load in P.U.
Speed Motor Load
Increment Torque,% Torque, % %kVA
0 to 20% 84 5 550
20 to 40% 93 8 540
40 to 60% 120 20 525
60 to 80% 175 30 480
80 to 100% 167 45 350

Solution - One iteration of calculation is shown below and the table of results is
calculated using a spread sheet.

Voltage at the motor terminal before stating = 105%

Speed increment = 20%
Motor input kVA (5.5 x 450 kVA) = 2475 kVA
2475
Motor terminal voltage = 105 1 = 98.07%
2475 + 35000

Motor full load torque (5250 x 500 hp/1170 rpm) = 2239.3 Ib-ft
Net torque (84% - 5%) = 79%
Net torque (0.79 x 2239.3 Ib-ft) - 1769.1 Ib-ft

Tr - Tt [V in per unit]" = 1769.1 [0.9807] = 1701.5 Ib-ft

3500 x l l 7 0 *0.20
AAt = = = 1.5 second
308(T-T1) 308x1759.1
This calculation can be repeated and the step-by-step results are presented in a
table. The total delta t's are added to get the total starting time of the motor.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Speed %oflvttcr FV Torque IVbtor Load Net Net Tor. Delta t
Increment %kVA kVA Vdtege Lb-tt Torque,% Torque,% Torque,% Lb-ft Seconds
Oto20% 550 2475 98.07 100 84 5 79 1,769.06 1.50
20 to 40% 540 2430 98.18 110 93 8 85 1,903.42 1.40
40 to 60% 525 23625 98.36 140 120 20 100 2239.32 1.19
60 to 80% 480 2160 98.90 200 175 30 145 3,247.01 0.82
80to100°/! 350 1575 100.478469 180 167 45 122 2,731.97 0.97
Total starting time in seconds 5.88

6.7 MOTOR STARTING WITH LIMITED-CAPACITY GENERATORS

In smaller power systems with one or two generators, the source impedance is
significant and a motor starting will result in the drop in the speed of the generator.
Usually, the generators are equipped with automatic voltage regulators and
governors. The motor starting performance depends on the type of voltage
regulator. With normal regulators there will be some voltage drop during the motor
starting. With high-speed regulators, the performance will be better and with extra
high speed regulation will be still better. It is necessary to perform motor starting
studies modeling both the generator and motor to be started.

6.8 COMPUTER-AIDED ANALYSIS

In large-scale power systems with multiple generators and feedback network

connections with various voltage levels, it is difficult to calculate the voltage drops
using the above-mentioned approaches. Therefore, computer-aided approaches are
used to calculate the required voltage drops. The motor to be started is represented
using the locked rotor impedance values and the power factor. The motor starting
solution is performed and the voltage drops at various bus locations are identified.
Also, the voltage, current, speed and power factor of the motor to be started is
available from the outputs.

There are several programs available to perform the motor starting analysis. In
order to perform the analysis the dynamic torque speed relation needs to be
resolved. Figure 6.3 illustrates the torque speed characteristics of a typical induction
motor. One is the torque characteristic of a motor and the other is the load
characteristic. The difference between the two torque curves represents the net
torque available to accelerate the motor. The point of intersection of these two
curves represents the steady state operating point. The dynamic equation of the
motor starting function is given by:
Tn
(6.21)
a, 2H

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 3.5 -

3 -

2.5 -•
Z>
Q. J
2
=J
1.5 -
O
1 -

0.5

0 -
C) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Speed, P.U

Figure 6.3 Speed Torque Characteristics of the Motor and the Load

Where H = Stored energy, kW-second/KVA

Tn = Accelerating torque

= Speed deviation with respect to time

dt
3 = Machine angle with reference to a fixed reference

The accelerating torque of the motor varies as a function of the motor terminal
voltage, motor rotor current and the motor speed. As the motor accelerates, both the
current and the power factor change, affecting the terminal voltage. Therefore, in
the motor starting simulation the following steps are used to solve equation (6.21).

• Solve the power flow equations to get the terminal voltage at time t = 0.
• Assume an initial motor speed.
• Calculate the motor current, torque and terminal voltage using the power flow
and the equivalent circuit.
• Integrate the shaft dynamic equation to a new rotor speed.
• Calculate the slip and R2/s terms.
• Increment the time step and repeat the entire calculations till the steady state
speed is reached.

Usually the motor starting analysis programs have a motor model library and a load
model library. The user can select the available data or can edit the existing data to
meet the data requirement. The load models are available for typical loads such as
fans, pumps, compressors, blowers and motor generator set. During the simulation
the necessary parameters are monitored in order to assess the effectiveness of the
motor starting. Some of the parameters useful for the motor starting evaluation are:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Bus voltage Motor speed
Motor terminal voltage Motor input current
Motor torque Load torque
Accelerating torque Real power and reactive power
Power factor

The plots can be examined to evaluate the acceptance of the starting condition. The
program output report contains the following:

Branch loading data Pre-starting voltages Final voltage report

Using both the graphical and report results the performance of the motor starting
can be evaluated.

Example 6.4 - A one-line diagram of a power system with a 1000-hp motor is

shown in Figure 6.4. The motor is to be started on line. The source impedance of
the system at the 69 kV level is (0.3172 + j 9.5617) Ohm/phase. The step down
transformer is 40 MVA, 69/13.8 kV, 10% impedance on nameplate MVA. The
medium voltage transformer is 2.5 MVA, 13.8/4.16 kV, 12% impedance. The
motor and the load torque characteristics are given in the reproduced output of the
input data. Perform a motor starting study using a computer-aided program and
discuss the results. Assume the cable and other necessary data.

Solution - The data is prepared interactively and the motor starting study is
performed. The Power Tools for Windows Program is used for the motor starting
study [3]. The input data listing is presented as a part of the output. This enables
verification of the accuracy of the data. The input data include the source,
transformer, cables, motor and the load models. The output includes the motor
starting characteristics in time domain and the performance at the operating point.

The time domain plot is presented for the motor speed in Figure 6.5. The motor
speed slowly increases to rated speed in 7.33 seconds. The motor terminal
voltage drops to 4 kV and then starts increasing, see Figure 6.6. The drop is
around 4% and is acceptable. The current during the starting is 6 P.U. and drops
to nominal value at the end of the start time and is shown in Figure 6.7. The
motor power factor is shown in Figure 6.8. The power factor increases from 0.2
to 0.8 during the starting process. Finally, the accelerating torque is shown in
Figure 6.9.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 69/1 3.8 kV 13.8/4.16 kV
—) c—
10 20^^30 ) C 60n

69 kV
_JL jr I

Motor
I

T1 T2
1000hp

10, 20, 30, 50 and 60 = Node numbers used in the study,

Tl and T2 = Transformers
Figure 6.4 One Line Diagram of the System used in Example 6.4

List 6.1 Edited Program Output

(Courtesy of SKM Analysis, Inc.)
FEEDER DATA

FEEDER FROM FEEDER TO QTY KV L-L LENGTH

10 UTILITY 20 TX A PRI 1 69000. 40. MI

IMPEDANCE: .0100000 + J .1000000 PER UNIT
B/2: .003824 PER UNIT

30 HBUS 50 TXD PRI 1 13800. 100. FT

IMPEDANCE: .1020 + J .0504 OHMS/M FEET

SOURCE BUS THEVENIN EQUIVALENT IMPEDANCE: .31722 + J 9.5167 OHMS

TRANSFORMER DATA

PRIMARY RECORD VOLTS PRI * SECONDARY VOLTS SEC

L-L FLA L-L FLA KVA

20 TX A PRI 69000. 335. 30 HBUS 13800, 1673. 40000,

IMPEDANCE: 0100 + J 10.00 PERCENT

50 TXD PRI 13800. 105. 60 4160 4160. 347. 2500.

IMPEDANCE: .1000 + J 12.00 PERCENT

BRANCH LOAD DATA

F R O M /TO BR. CONSTANT KVA CONSTANT Z

B U S / B U S TYPE KVA %PF KVA %PF

10 UTILITY
20 TX A PRI FEEDER 15601 -94.1 307 -99.9

30 TX A PRI
50 HBUS TRANS. 15601 -94.1 307 -99.9

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 List 6.1 Edited Version of the Output - Continued
(Courtesy of SKM Analysis, Inc.)
MOTOR DATA

MOTOR NAME B U S MODEL DISCRIPTION

NO . /NAME / INITIAL STATUS KVA KV RPM

MTR 60 60 GRAPHICAL MODEL 1036.1 4.16 1800.

4160 OFFLINE Wk**2(LB-FT2): 1081.708 2H: 1.563
GRAPHICAL MODEL DATA
SPEED(RPM) CUF '(AMPS) TORQUE(FT-LBS) PF
.00 785..14 2128 .47 .300
180.00 776,.51 2128 .47 .300
360.00 767..88 2128 .47 .310
540.00 762..13 2217..16 .320
720 .00 754..94 2276..28 .330
900.00 742 ,.00 2424..09 .360
1080.00 724 ..74 2512 .78 .400
1260.00 700 ..30 2660 .59 .460
1440 .00 668..66 2778 .84 .540
1530.00 648 ,.53 3074 .46 .620
1620.00 625..52 3517 .89 .760
1710.00 582..38 4995 .99 .860
1755.00 330..74 6474 . 10 .840
1776 .60 143 .80 2956 .21 .800
1800.00 28..76 .00 .100
MOTOR SWITCHING DATA
PUT ON LINE AT TIME: 2.00
CONTROLLER TYPE: FULL VOLTAGE CONTROL FUNCTION: TIME
LOAD DATA
LOAD BREAK-A-WAY TORQUE (FT-LBS): 1182.
LOAD(FT-LBS) = 118. + .8991E-03 * (RPM 2.00)

°000
1800 -

1600 ^^
5
1400 ^^
Q. 1200 - ^^
QL
1000 -
/
•a
0)
« 800 - /
o.
co 600 - /
400 /
200 ^^
Q
^^
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time, Second

Figure 6.5 Motor Speed During Starting

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 of 3
O

0 5 10 15 20 25
FREQUENCY NUMBER
Figure 7.11 Frequency Domain Results at the 13.8 kV Bus; Damping R = 9 Ohm

There is very small voltage amplification. This behavior is attributed to the

damping resistor in the 5th harmonic filter. Therefore, a frequency response study
was conducted without the 5th harmonic damping resistor and is shown in Figure
7.12. Without damping resistors, the voltage magnification at the fifth harmonic
frequency is significant.

r 3

0 5 10 15 20 25
FREQUENCY NUMBER
Figure 7.12 Frequency Domain Results at the 13.8 Bus with no Damping R

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 \
z>
\
a \
Qj"
4 08 - \
O)
a \
o \
\ /
4 -
^~—^
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time, Second

Figure 6.6 Bus Voltage During Starting

°nn

finn
-—- ^
\
Current A

Ann - \
^nn
9nn
\
mn -
n
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time, Second

Figure 6.7 Motor Current During Starting

3 4 5
Time, Second

Figure 6.8 Power Factor at the Motor Terminal During Starting

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 3 4 5
Time, Second

Figure 6.9 Accelerating Torque of the Motor During Starting

6.9 CONCLUSIONS

The concepts involved with motor starting are discussed with respect to various
motor designs. The criteria for motor starting are stated very briefly. The starting
methods used are outlined. The system data required for motor starting analysis are
presented with example data. The various voltage drop calculation approaches are
discussed for motor starting analysis along with computer-aided analysis. An
example analysis is presented along with the output report and some important
plots.

PROBLEMS

1. The rating of a motor used in an industrial application is 2,500-hp and is

supplied through a 24.9 kV, three phase feeder. The system impedance at the
source is (3.318 + J5.982) Ohm at 24.9 kV. Calculate the voltage at the point of
common coupling during the motor stating. Identify if there is a flicker problem
and suggest suitable remedial approach. See Reference [2].

2. Consider a motor supplied from a source with a short circuit capacity of 40,000
kVA. The rating of the motor is 1500 hp, 4.16 kV, 0.9 power factor, 1800 rpm
with a WK2 of 10,200 lb-ft2. Assume a torque speed and kVA characteristics as
given in the example calculations. Calculate the acceleration time of the motor
using the step-by-step approach.

3. What is the effect of inertia on the motor starting? Explain this in terms of a
very large inertia constant versus a smaller inertia constant.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 4. What will happen if the speed torque characteristics of a motor load is
nonlinear. Give an example practical load and mention its effect on the starting
and operation of the motor. Hint - Air conditioner application.

5. A 2 MW, 4.16 kV, 1,800 rpm induction motor is running at the operating
point. Another motor is to be started in a nearby location with the torque speed
characteristics and load characteristics as given in the typical data. The motor
to be started is a 1.5 MW, 4.16 kV, 1200 rpm, three-phase induction motor.
The short circuit rating of the source is 750 MVA. Simulate the system using a
motor starting or dynamics program. Assess the starting condition and
recommend which remedial measures are needed, if any. State the assumptions
made.

6. What is the difference between the simulation of a running motor and starting
motor using a dynamics program?

REFERENCES

1. ANSI/IEEE Standard 399, IEEE Recommended Practice for Power System

Analysis, 1990 (Brown Book).

2. M. K. Walker, "Electric Utility Flicker Limitations", IEEE Transactions on

Industry Applications, Vol.IA-15, No.6, November/December 1979, pp. 644-
655.

3. Power Tools for Windows Program, SKM Analysis, Inc., Manhattan Beach,
California.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 APPENDIX A

CONDUCTOR DATA

Table A-l Electrical Characteristics of High Strength (HS) Conductors

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile inch
5/8 2.19 2.27 1.12 0.1083 0.621
1/2 3.44 3.57 1.24 0.115 0.495
7/16 4.45 4.62 1.33 0.1188 0.435
3/8 6.51 6.75 1.5 0.1244 0.36
5/16 9.7 10 1.8 0.139 0.3125

Table A-2 Electrical Characteristics of Extra High Strength (EHS) Conductors

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile inch
5/8 2.26 2.32 1.08 0.1083 0.621
1/2 3.56 3.66 1.2 0.115 0.495
7/16 4.61 4.74 1.28 0.1188 0.435
3/8 6.74 6.93 1.44 0.1244 0.36

Notes for Tables A-l and A-2:

Xi = Inductive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc = Capacitive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, Megohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-3 Electrical Characteristics of Aluminum Conductor Alloy Reinforced
(ACAR) Conductors

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
BLUEBIRD 0.0405 0.0454 0.348 0.0774 2339 1.762
KIWI 0.0417 0.0468 0.35 0.0778 2267 1.735
CHUKAR 0.049 0.0544 0.36 0.0802 1933 1.602
LAPWING 0.0555 0.0608 0.368 0.0821 1703 1.504

BITTERN 0.0698 0.0739 0.381 0.0854 1362 1.345

BLUEJAY 0.0799 0.0834 0.39 0.0873 1197 1.259
CURLEW 0.0806 0.0845 0.391 0.0876 1172 1.246
ORTOLAN 0.0863 0.0897 0.394 0.0885 1109 1.212

CARDINAL 0.0885 0.092 0.396 0.0888 1081 1.196

CARDINAL 0.0906 0.094 0.396 0.0888 1081 1.196
DRAKE 0.1032 0.1058 0.405 0.0911 927 1.108
TERN 0.1098 0.1144 0.41 0.0923 854 1.063

GROSBEAK 0.1278 0.1297 0.419 0.0945 740 0.99

DOVE 0.1469 0.1488 0.429 0.0964 653 0.927
PELICAN 0.1905 0.1925 0.444 0.1003 504 0.814
MERLIN 0.2765 0.278 0.465 0.1054 355 0.683

ACAR900 0.1062 0.109 0.408 0.0911 900 1.092

ACAR2000 0.0487 0.0544 0.355 0.0795 2000 1.63
ACAR1600 0.0608 0.0655 0.372 0.083 1600 1.458
ACAR1000 0.0947 0.0978 0.393 0.0897 1000 1.152
ACAR1200 0.0788 0.0826 0.386 0.0873 1200 1.263

Notes for Table A-3:

Xi — Inductive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc = Capacitive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, Megohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-4 Electrical Characteristics of Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR)
Conductors

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
JOREE 0.0371 0.0425 0.337 0.0755 2515 1.88
KINGFISHER 0.0392 0.0447 0.342 0.0765 2385 1.82
THRASHER 0.0404 0.0454 0.342 0.0767 2312 1.802
KIWI 0.0431 0.0484 0.348 0.0778 2167 1.735
BLUEBIRD 0.0431 0.0477 0.344 0.0774 2156 1.762
CHUKAR 0.0522 0.0561 0.355 0.0802 1781 1.602
LAPWING 0.0583 0.062 0.364 0.0821 1590 1.504
FALCON 0.0581 0.0611 0.358 0.0813 1590 1.545
BITTERN 0.0587 0.0618 0.3776 0.0855 1557.4 1.345
NUTHATCH 0.0614 0.0649 0.367 0.0828 1510.5 1.465
PARROT 0.0612 0.0641 0.362 0.0821 1510.5 1.505
BOBOLINK 0.0648 0.0681 0.371 0.0836 1431 1.427
PLOVER 0.0646 0.0673 0.365 0.0828 1431 1.465
DIPPER 0.0686 0.0717 0.374 0.0845 1351.5 1.386
MARTIN 0.0684 0.071 0.368 0.0837 1351.5 1.424
BITTERN 0.0729 0.0759 0.378 0.0854 1272 1.345
PHEASANT 0.0727 0.0751 0.372 0.0846 1272 1.382
OXBIRD 0.078 0.0806 0.3863 0.0873 1192.5 1.266
BUNTING 0.0777 0.0805 0.382 0.0863 1192.5 1.302
CRACKLE 0.0775 0.0798 0.376 0.0855 1192.5 1.338
BLUE JAY 0.0833 0.0859 0.386 0.0873 1113 1.258
FINCH 0.083 0.0851 0.38 0.0866 1113 1.293

Notes for Table A-4:

Xi = Inductive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc = Capacitive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, Megohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-4 Electrical Characteristics of Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR)
Conductors - Continued

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
ORTOLAN 0.0898 0.0922 0.39 0.0885 1033.5 1.212
CURLEW 0.089 0.091 0.385 0.0877 1033.5 1.245
NONAME 0.089 0.091 0.386 0.0878 1033.5 1.245
TERN 0.0957 0.0976 0.4068 0.0925 957.2 1.063
CORNCRAKE 0.0972 0.0994 0.396 0.0897 954 1.165
NOCODE 0.0968 0.0989 0.393 0.0894 954 1.18
CARDINAL 0.0964 0.0983 0.389 0.0889 954 1.196
REDBIRD 0.0964 0.0982 0.39 0.089 954 1.196
MERGANSER 0.0952 0.0966 0.382 0.0876 954 1.248
TURNSTONE 0.103 0.1052 0.4 0.0906 900 1.131
RUDDY 0.1031 0.1053 0.399 0.0905 900 1.131
NOWORD 0.1025 0.1045 0.397 0.0902 900 1.146
REDSTART 0.1022 0.104 0.394 0.0898 900 1.162
CANARY 0.1022 0.104 0.393 0.0897 900 1.162
BALDPATE 0.1011 0.1024 0.385 0.0885 900 1.212
WILLET 0.106 0.1082 0.4 0.0909 874.5 1.115
CRANE 0.1051 0.107 0.395 0.0901 874.5 1.146
COOT 0.1167 0.1189 0.411 0.093 795 1.04
TERN 0.1166 0.119 0.406 0.0923 795 1.063
TURBIT 0.1166 0.1185 0.407 0.0924 795 1.063
PUFFIN 0.1162 0.1179 0.404 0.0921 795 1.077
CONDOR 0.1158 0.117 0.401 0.0916 795 1.092
CUCKOO 0.1157 0.1169 0.402 0.0916 795 1.092
DRAKE 0.1152 0.117 0.399 0.0911 795 1.108
MALLARD 0.1145 0.116 0.393 0.0903 795 1.14
SKIMMER 0.1145 0.116 0.393 0.0903 795 1.14
GREBE 0.1296 0.1314 0.413 0.0939 715.5 1.009
CROW 0.1286 0.13 0.407 0.0931 715.5 1.036
STILT 0.1285 0.1296 0.408 0.0931 715.5 1.036
STARLING 0.1279 0.129 0.405 0.0927 715.5 1.051
REDWING 0.1273 0.128 0.399 0.0919 715.5 1.081

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-4 Electrical Characteristics of Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR)
Conductors - Continued

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
BUTEO 0.1273 0.128 0.399 0.0919 715.5 1.081
GULL 0.138 0.139 0.411 0.0942 666.6 1
FLAMINGO 0.1379 0.139 0.412 0.0942 666.6 1
CAN NET 0.1375 0.139 0.409 0.0937 666.6 1.014
SWIFT 0.1459 0.1477 0.425 0.0963 636 0.93
KINGBIRD 0.1453 0.1469 0.424 0.096 636 0.94
ROOK 0.1446 0.146 0.415 0.0949 636 0.977
GOOSE 0.1447 0.146 0.414 0.0949 636 0.977
GROSBEAK 0.144 0.145 0.412 0.0944 636 0.99
EGRET 0.1431 0.144 0.406 0.0936 636 1.019
SCOTER 0.1431 0.144 0.406 0.0936 636 1.019
DUCK 0.1519 0.1533 0.417 0.0956 606 0.953
PEACOCK 0.152 0.153 0.418 0.0956 605 0.953
SQUAB 0.1515 0.153 0.415 0.0952 605 0.966
TEAL 0.1505 0.151 0.41 0.0943 605 0.994
WOODDUCK 0.1505 0.1514 0.41 0.0943 605 0.994
OSPREY 0.1662 0.168 0.432 0.098 556.5 0.879
PARAKEET 0.1653 0.166 0.423 0.0968 556.5 0.914
DOVE 0.1646 0.166 0.42 0.0964 556.5 0.927
EAGLE 0.1634 0.164 0.415 0.0956 556.5 0.953
PELICAN 0.1937 0.195 0.441 0.1003 477 0.814
FLICKER 0.1927 0.194 0.432 0.0991 477 0.846
HAWK 0.1921 0.193 0.43 0.0987 477 0.858
HEN 0.1907 0.191 0.424 0.0979 477 0.883
CHICKADEE 0.2325 0.234 0.452 0.103 397.5 0.743
BRANT 0.2315 0.2327 0.444 0.1018 397.5 0.772
IBIS 0.2306 0.231 0.441 0.1014 397.5 0.783
LARK 0.2288 0.229 0.435 0.1006 397.5 0.806
MERLIN 0.2747 0.276 0.463 0.1054 336.4 0.684
WIDGEON 0.2735 0.2749 0.454 0.1043 336.4 0.71
JUNCO 0.3412 0.342 0.459 0.1065 266.8 0.66
PENGUIN 0.4284 0.434 0.557 0.1112 211.6 0.563
TURKEY 3.458 3.46 0.774 0.1421 26.24 0.198

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-5 Electrical Characteristics of Alumoweld Conductors (ALUMOWE)

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
37 No.5 0.2282 0.2327 0.604 0.87 1224.2 1.273
37 No.6 0.2879 0.2935 0.618 0.0904 971 1.134
37No.7 0.363 0.2327 0.632 0.0939 770.4 1.01
37No.8 0.4577 0.4667 0.646 0.0973 611 0.899
37No.9 0.5773 0.5886 0.66 0.1007 484.2 0.801
37 No. 10 0.7278 0.7409 0.674 0.1042 384.2 0.713
19 No.5 0.442 0.4507 0.645 0.097 628.7 0.91
19 No.6 0.5574 0.5683 0.659 0.1004 498.6 0.81
19No.7 0.703 0.7171 0.673 0.1038 395.6 0.721
19No.8 0.8864 0.9038 0.687 0.1073 313.7 0.642
19No.9 1.118 1.14 0.701 0.1107 248.7 0.572
19N0.10 1.409 1.437 0.715 0.1141 197.3 0.509
7 No.5 1.217 1.24 0.707 0.1121 231.6 0.546
7 No.6 1.507 1.536 0.721 0.1155 183.7 0.486
7No.7 1.9 1.937 0.735 0.119 145.8 0.433
7No.8 2.4 2.44 0.749 0.1224 115.6 0.385
7No.9 3.02 3.08 0.763 0.1258 91.6 0.343
7N0.10 3.81 3.88 0.777 0.1293 72.7 0.306
3 No.5 2.78 2.78 0.707 0.1219 99.3 0.392
3 No.6 3.51 3.51 0.721 0.1253 78.7 0.349
3No.7 4.42 4.42 0.735 0.1288 62.5 0.311
3No.8 5.58 5.58 0.749 0.1322 49.5 0.277
3No,9 7.04 7.04 0.763 0.1356 39.3 0.246
3N0.10 8.87 8.87 0.777 0.1391 31.2 0.22
10No.11 1.247 1.247 0.735 0.119 38.8 0.4449

Notes for Table A-5:

Xi = Inductive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc = Capa.citive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, Mej^ohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-6 Electrical Characteristics of All Aluminum Conductors (AAC)

Rdc Rac Xi,Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
BLUEBONNET 0.0271 0.0357 0.323 0.0714 3500 2.158
TRILLIUM 0.03134 0.0392 0.332 0.0736 3000 1.998
LUPINE 0.03764 0.0446 0.344 0.0764 2500 1.823
COWSLIP 0.04658 0.0525 0.357 0.0797 2000 1.63
JESSAMINE 0.05319 0.0585 0.366 0.0817 1750 1.525
COREOPSIS 0.0585 0.0634 0.372 0.0831 1590 1.454
GLADIOLUS 0.0616 0.0663 0.375 0.0838 1511 1.417
CARNATION 0.065 0.0695 0.378 0.0846 1431 1.379
COLUMBINE 0.0688 0.0731 0.381 0.0855 1351.5 1.34
NARCISSUS 0.0732 0.0772 0.385 0.0864 1272 1.3
HAWTHORN 0.0781 0.0819 0.389 0.0874 1192.5 1.258
MARIGOLD 0.0836 0.0872 0.393 0.0884 1113 1.216
LARKSPUR 0.09 0.0933 0.398 0.0895 1033.5 1.172
BLUEBELL 0.09 0.0933 0.399 0.0895 1033.5 1.17
HAWKWEED 0.0931 0.0963 0.401 0.09 1000 1.151
CAMELLIA 0.09316 0.0964 0.4 0.09 1000 1.152
GOLDENROD 0.0975 0.101 0.403 0.0906 954 1.126
MAGNOLIA 0.0975 0.101 0.403 0.0907 954 1.124
SNAPDRAGON 0.1034 0.106 0.406 0.0915 900 1.094
COCKSCOMB 0.1034 0.106 0.407 0.0915 900 1.092
CROCUS 0.1064 0.109 0.408 0.0919 874.5 1.078
ANEMONE 0.1064 0.109 0.409 0.092 874.5 1.077
LILAC 0.117 0.12 0.414 0.0933 795 1.028
ARBUTUS 0.117 0.12 0.415 0.0934 795 1.026

Notes for Table A-6:

Xi = Inductive reactance at one foot spacing; and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc = Cap acitive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, Megiohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-6 Electrical Characteristics of All Aluminum Conductors (AAC) -
Continued

Rdc Rac Xi Xc Diameter,

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile Ohm/mile Mohm/mile kcmil inch
CATTAIL 0.1242 0.127 0.417 0.0942 750 0.998
PETUNIA 0.1242 0.127 0.417 0.0942 750 0.998
NASTURTIUM 0.1301 0.133 0.421 0.0949 715.5 0.975
VIOLET 0.1301 0.133 0.421 0.0949 715.5 0.974
FLAG 0.133 0.135 0.422 0.0953 700 0.962
VERBENA 0.133 0.135 0.422 0.0953 700 0.962
ORCHID 0.1464 0.149 0.428 0.0967 636 0.918
MEADOWSW 0.1553 0.157 0.432 0.0976 600 0.891
MISTLETOE 0.1674 0.169 0.438 0.0988 556.5 0.858
DAHLIA 0.1674 0.169 0.438 0.0988 556.5 0.858
HYACINTH 0.1864 0.188 0.443 0.1003 500 0.813
ZINNIA 0.1864 0.188 0.443 0.1004 500 0.811
SYRINGA 0.1954 0.197 0.446 0.101 477 0.795
COSMOS 0.1954 0.197 0.446 0.101 477 0.795
GOLDENTUFT 0.2069 0.208 0.451 0.1019 450 0.769
CANNA 0.234 0.235 0.459 0.1037 397.5 0.723
DAFFODIL 0.2662 0.267 0.466 0.1056 350 0.679
TULIP 0.2766 0.278 0.469 0.1062 336.4 0.666
PEONY 0.3101 0.311 0.476 0.1079 300 0.629
LAUREL 0.349 0.35 0.483 0.1097 266.8 0.593
DAISY 0.349 0.35 0.489 0.11 266.8 0.586
VALERIAN 0.3724 0.373 0.487 0.1106 250 0.573
SNEEZWORT 0.3724 0.373 0.493 0.111 250 0.567
OXLIP 0.4398 0.441 0.504 0.1134 211.6 0.522
PHLOX 0.5551 0.556 0.518 0.1169 167.8 0.464
ASTER 0.6994 0.7 0.532 0.1203 133.1 0.414
POPPY 0.8821 0.882 0.546 0.1237 105.6 0.368
PANSY 1.1113 1.114 0.56 0.1272 83.69 0.328
IRIS 1.402 1.402 0.574 0.1306 66.36 0.292
ROSE 2.232 2.232 0.602 0.1375 41.74 0.232
PEACHBELL 3.551 3.551 0.63 0.1444 26.24 0.184

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-7 Electrical Characteristics of the All Aluminum Alloy Conductors
(AAAC)

Rdc Rac Xi Xc Diameter,

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile Ohm/mile Mohm/mile kcmil inch
SOLAR 0.1148 0.117 0.405 0.0911 927 1.108
SPAR 0.1434 0.146 0.419 0.0944 741 99
RUNE 0.1629 0.165 0.429 0.0964 652 0.926
RUBLE 0.1812 0.183 0.435 0.098 587 0.879

REMEX 0.1902 0.192 0.438 0.0987 559 0.858

REX 0.2113 0.212 0.444 0.1003 504 0.814
RAGOUT 0.2284 0.23 0.449 0.1014 465 0.782
REDE 0.2536 0.254 0.455 0.108 420 0.743

RADIAN 0.2694 0.27 0.459 0.1039 395 0.721

RADAR 0.2993 0.3 0.465 0.1054 355 0.683
RAMIE 0.3397 0.341 0.473 0.1073 313 0.642
RATCH 0.3775 0.378 0.48 0.1089 281 0.608

KITTLE 0.431 0.431 0.494 0.1112 247 0.563

KOPECK 0.5438 0.544 0.508 0.1146 196 0.502
KAYAK 0.684 0.684 0.522 0.118 155 0.447
KIBE 0.862 0.862 0.536 0.1214 123 0.398

KENCH 1.37 1.37 0.564 0.1283 77 0.316

KAKI 2.18 2.18 0.593 0.1353 49 0.25
KAZOO 3.47 3.47 0.621 0.1421 31 0.198

Notes for Table A-7:

Xi Inductive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc Capacitive reactance at one foot spacing and at 60 Hz, ]Megohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table A-8 Electrical Characteristics of Copper Conductors

Rdc Rac Xi.Ohm Xc.Mohm Diameter

Size Ohm/mile Ohm/mile /mile -mile kcmil inch
#14 13.8864 13.8864 0.7346 0.1721 4.11 0.0727
#12 8.7648 8.7648 0.7067 0.1653 6.53 0.0915
#10 5.4912 5.4912 0.6778 0.1582 10.38 0.116
#8 3.4426 3.4426 0.6499 0.1514 16.51 0.146
#6 2.1701 2.1701 0.6218 0.1446 26.24 0.184
#4 1.3622 1.3622 0.5937 0.1376 41.74 0.232
#3 1.0824 1.0824 0.5798 0.1343 52.62 0.26
#2 0.8554 0.8554 0.5657 0.1308 66.36 0.292
#1 0.6811 0.6811 0.5502 0.127 83.69 0.332
1/0 0.5386 0.5386 0.5363 0.1237 105.6 0.372
2/0 0.4277 0.4277 0.5222 0.1202 133.1 0.418
3/0 0.3389 0.3389 0.5079 0.1167 167.8 0.47
4/0 0.2693 0.2693 0.4938 0.1132 211.6 0.528
250kcmil 0.2276 0.2276 0.4835 0.1107 250 0.575
SOOkcmil 0.1901 0.1901 0.4724 0.108 300 0.63
350kcmil 0.1626 0.1626 0.4629 0.1057 350 0.681
400kcmil 0.142 0.142 0.4548 0.1037 400 0.728
SOOkcmil 0.114 0.114 0.4414 0.1005 500 0.813
GOOkcmil 0.095 0.095 0.43 0.0977 600 0.893
700kcmil 0.0813 0.0813 0.4207 0.0954 700 0.964
750kcmil 0.076 0.076 0.4165 0.0944 750 0.998
SOOkcmil 0.0713 0.0713 0.4127 0.0934 800 1.03
900kcmil 0.0634 0.0634 0.4054 0.0916 900 1.094
1000kcmil 0.057 0.057 0.3991 0.0901 1000 1.152
1250kcmil 0.0456 0.0456 0.3854 0.0867 1250 1.289
1 SOOkcmil 0.0379 0.0379 0.3744 0.0841 1500 1.412
1750kcmil 0.0325 0.0325 0.3649 0.0818 1750 1.526
2000kcmil 0.0285 0.0285 0.3568 0.0798 2000 1.632

Notes for Table A-8:

Xi Inductive reactance at one foot spacingI and at 60Hz, Ohms/mile

Xc Capacitive reactance at one foot spaciiig and at 60 Hz, Me£^ohm-mile

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 APPENDIX B

EQUIPMENT PREFERRED RATINGS

B-l Circuit Breaker Ratings

The circuit breakers used in the power system applications are classified into two
categories in the ANSI Standard C37.06, 1979 as general purpose and definite
purpose.

General purpose circuit breakers - These are used for the switching of lines,
transformers, reactors and buses. The preferred ratings of such circuit breakers are
from ANSI Standard C37.06, Tables 1, 2 and 3 representing the indoor, outdoor
and gas insulated switchgear as follows.

Table 1 Preferred ratings for indoor circuit breakers (4.76 kV through 38 kV).

Table 2 Preferred ratings for outdoor circuit breakers 72.5 kV and below,
including circuit breakers in gas insulated substations (15.5 kV through
72.5 kV).

Table 3 Preferred ratings for outdoor circuit breakers 121 kV and above, including
circuit breakers applied in gas insulated substations (121 kV through 800
kV).

Definite purpose circuit breakers - These are used for the switching of shunt
capacitors. Preferred ratings of such circuit breakers from ANSI standard C37.06,
Tables 1 A, 2A and 3A for indoor, outdoor and gas insulated switchgear are:

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 1A Preferred capacitance current switching ratings for indoor circuit
breakers (4.76 kV through 38 kV).

Table 2A Preferred capacitance current switching ratings for outdoor

circuit breakers 72.5 kV and below including circuit breakers in
gas insulated substations (15.5 kV through 72.5 kV).

Table 3A Preferred capacitance current switching ratings for outdoor

circuit breakers 121 kV and above including circuit breakers
applied in gas insulated substations (121 kV through 800 kV).

B-2 Surge Arresters

The surge arresters are used to protect the power system equipment from
overvoltages produced due to switching and lightning. Before the 1980s the gaped
silicon carbide arresters were used. Then the Metal Oxide Varistors (MOV) were
introduced in the 1980s for the same applications. Presently MOV arresters are used
in the protection of overhead lines, underground cables, transformers, circuit
breakers, shunt capacitors and other power system equipment. The following MOV
surge arrester ratings are reproduced from IEEE standard 141.

Table B-l Station class MOV arrester characteristics.

Table B-2 Intermediate class MOV arrester characteristics.
Table B-3 Distribution class MOV arrester characteristics, normal duty.
Table B-4 Distribution class MOV arrester characteristics, heavy duty.
Table B-5 Distribution class MOV arrester characteristics, riser pole.

B-3 Shunt Capacitors

Shunt capacitors are used for power factor correction in all levels of power system
voltages. The preferred shunt capacitor ratings are reproduced from IEEE Standard
103 6 in Chapter 10.

REFERENCES

1. C37.06 Preferred Ratings and Related Required Capabilities for AC High

Voltage Breakers, 2000.

2. IEEE Standard 141, Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution for
Industrial Plants, 1993.

3. IEEE Standard 1036, IEEE Guide for Application of Shunt Capacitors, 1992.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 1
Preferred Ratings for Indoor Oilless Circuit Breakers
Maximum Closing and
Symmetrical Latching
Rated Rated Rated Short- Interrupting Capability 2 7K
Maximum Voltage Rated Continuous Circuit Current (at Rated Rated Maximum Capability and Rated times Rated Short-
Voltage Range Current at 60 HZ Rated Maximum Interrupting Voltage Divided Short-Time Current Circuit Current kA,
kV,rms Factor K Amperes, rms kV) kA, rms Time cycles by K kV, rms KA, rms Crest
4.76 1.36 1200 8.8 5 3.5 12 32
4.76 1.24 1200, 2000 29 5 3.85 36 97
4.76 1.19 1200,2000,3000 41 5 4.0 49 132
8.25 1.25 1200, 2000 33 5 6.6 41 111
15.0 1.30 1200,2000 18 5 11.5 23 62
15.0 1.30 1200, 2000 28 5 11.5 36 97
15.0 1.30 1200,2000, 3000 37 5 11.5 48 130
38.0 1.65 1200, 2000,3000 21 5 23.0 35 95
38.0 1.0 1200, 3000 40 5 38.0 40 108

Table 1A
Preferred Capacitance Current Switching Ratings for Indoor Oilless Circuit Breakers

General-Purpose Definite-Purpose Circuit Breakers Rated Capacitance

Circuit Breakers Switching Current
Rated Capacitance Shunt Capacitor Bank or Cable
Switching Current Back-to-Back
Shunt Capacitor
Bank or Cable Inrush Current
Rated Rated Short-
Maximum Circuit Rated Continuous Isolated
Voltage Current kA, Current Amperes, Isolated Current Current Current Peak Current Frequency
kV,rms rms rms Amperes, rms Amperes, rms Amperes, rms kA Hz
4.76 8.8 1200 400 630 630 15 2000
4.76 29.00 1200 400 630 630 15 2000
4.76 29.00 2000 400 1000 1000 15 1270
4.76 41.00 1200,2000 400 630 630 15 2000
4.76 41.00 3000 400 1000 1000 15 1270
8.25 33.00 1200 250 630 630 15 2000
8.25 33.00 2000 250 1000 1000 15 1270
15.00 18.00 1200 250 630 630 15 2000
15.00 18.00 2000 250 1000 1000 15 1270
15.00 28.00 1200 250 630 630 15 2000
15.00 28.00 2000 250 1000 1000 15 1270
15.00 37.00 1200 250 630 630 15 2000
15.00 37.00 2000 250 1000 1000 18 2400
15.00 37.00 3000 250 1600 1600 25 1330
38.00 21.00 1200,2000,3000 50 250 250 18 6000
38.00 40.00 1200,3000 50 250 250 25 8480

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 2
Preferred Ratings for Outdoor Circuit Breakers 72.5 kV and Below,
Including Circuit Breakers Applied in Gas Insulated Substations

Rated Maximum Closing and

Rated Rated Rated Short- Maximum Symmetrical Latching Capability
Maximum Voltage Rated Continuous Circuit Current (at Voltage Interrupting Capability 2.7K times Rated
Voltage Range Current at 60 Hz Rated Maximum Divided by K and Rated Short-Time Short-Circuit
kV,rms Factor K. Amperes, rms kV) kA.rms kV, rms Current kA. rms Current kA, Crest
15.5 1.0 600, 1200 12.5 15.5 12.5 34
15.5 1.0 1200,2000 20.0 15.5 20.0 54
15.5 1.0 1200,2000 25.0 15.5 25.0 68
15.5 1.0 1200,2000,3000 40.0 15.5 40.0 108
25.8 1.0 1200,2000 12.5 25.8 12.5 34
25.8 1.0 1200,2000 25.0 25.8 25.0 68
38.0 1.0 1200, 2000 16.0 38.0 16.0 43
38.0 1.0 1200,2000 20.0 38.0 20.0 54
38.0 1.0 1200,2000 25.0 38.0 25.0 68
38.0 1.0 1200, 2000 31.5 38.0 31.5 85
38.0 1.0 1200, 2000, 3000 40.0 38.0 40.0 108
48.3 1.0 1200,2000 20.0 48.3 20.0 54
48.3 1.0 1200,2000 31.5 48.3 31.5 85
48.3 1.0 1200,2000,3000 40.0 48.3 40.0 108
72.5 1.0 1200, 2000 20.0 72.5 20.0 54
72.5 1.0 1200, 2000 31.5 72.5 31.5 85
72.5 1.0 1200,2000,3000 40.0 72.5 40.0 108

Table 2A
Preferred Capacitance Current Switching Ratings for Outdoor Circuit Breakers 72.5 kV and Below,
Including Circuit Breakers Applied in Gas Insulated Substations
General-Purpose
Circuit Breakers
Rated Definite-Purpose Circuit Breakers Rated Capacitance
Capacitance Switching Current
Switching Shunt Capacitor Bank or Cable
Current Back-Back
Shunt Capacitor
Bank or Cable Inrush Currei
Rated Rated Short- Overhead Isolated
Maximum Circuit Rated Continuous Line Current Current Current
Voltage Current kA, Current Amperes, Isolated Current Amperes, Amperes, Amperes, Peak Frequency
kV.rms rms rms Amperes, rms mis rms rms Current kA Hz
15.5 12.5 600, 1200 250 100 400 400 20 4240
15.5 20.0 1200, 2000 250 100 400 400 20 4240
15.5 25.0 1200, 2000 250 100 400 400 20 4240
15.5 40.0 1200, 2000, 3000 250 100 400 400 20 4240
25.8 12.5 1200, 2000 160 100 400 400 20 4240
25.8 25.0 1200, 2000 160 100 400 400 20 4240
38.0 16.0 1200,2000 100 100 250 250 20 4240
38.0 20.0 1200, 2000 100 100 250 250 20 4240
38.0 25.0 1200, 2000 100 100 250 250 20 4240
38.0 31.5 1200, 2000 100 100 250 250 20 4240
38.0 40.0 1200,2000, 3000 100 100 250 250 20 4240
48.3 20.0 1200, 2000 10 100 250 250 20 6800
48.3 31.5 1200, 2000 10 100 250 250 20 6800
48.3 40.0 1200, 2000, 3000 10 100 250 250 20 6800
72.5 20.0 1200, 2000 20 100 630 630 25 3360
72.5 31.5 1200,2000 20 100 630 630 25 3360
72.5 40.0 1200, 2000, 3000 20 100 630 630 25 3360

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 3
Preferred Ratings for Outdoor Circuit Breakers 121 kV and Above,
Including Circuit Breakers Applied in Gas Insulated Substations
Closing and
Maximum Latching
Rated Short- Rated Symmetrical Capability 2.7K
Rated Rated Circuit Current Rated Maximum Interrupting times Rated
Maximum Voltage Rated Continuous (at Rated InterruptinjI Voltage Capability and Short-Circuit
Voltage Range Current at 60 Hz Maximum kV) kA, Time Divided by Rated Short- Current kA,
kV,rms Factor K Amperes, rms rms Cycles K kV, rms Time Current Crest
121 1.U 12UU i!U 3 121 2U t>4
121 1.0 1600, 2000, 3000 40 3 121 40 108
121 1.0 2000, 3000 63 3 121 63 170
145 1.0 1200 20 3 145 20 54
145 1.0 1600,2000,3000 40 3 145 40 108
145 1.0 2000, 3000 63 3 145 63 170
145 1.0 2000, 3000 80 3 145 80 216
169 1.0 1200 16 3 169 16 43
169 1.0 1600 31.5 3 169 31.5 85
169 1.0 2000 40 3 169 40 108
169 1.0 2000 50 3 169 50 135
169 1.0 2000 63 3 169 63 170
242 1.0 1600, 2000, 3000 31.5 3 242 31.5 85
242 1.0 2000, 3000 40 3 242 40 108
242 1.0 2000 50 3 242 50 135
242 1.0 2000, 3000 63 3 242 63 170
362 1.0 2000, 3000 40 2 362 40 108
362 1.0 2000 63 2 362 63 170
550 1.0 2000, 3000 40 2 550 40 108
550 1.0 3000 63 2 550 63 170
800 1.0 2000, 3000 40 2 800 40 108
800 1.0 3000 63 2 800 63 170

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table 3A
Preferred Capacitance Current Switching Ratings for Outdoor Circuit Breakers 121 kV and Above,
Including Circuit Breakers Applied in Gas Insulated Substations
General-Purpose Circuit
Breakers Rated
Capacitance Switching Definite-Purpose Circuit Breakers Rated Capacitance
Current Switching Current
Shunt Capacitor Bank or Cable
B.ack-to-Bac k
Inrush Current
Rated Rated Short- Overhead
Maximum Circuit Rated Continuous Line Isolated Overhead Isolated Peak
Voltage Current kA, Current Amperes, Current A, Current A, Line Current Current Current A, Current Frequency
kV.rms rms rms rms rms A, rms A, mis rms kA Hz
121 20 1200 50 50 160 315 315 16 4250
121 40 1600, 2000, 3000 50 50 160 315 315 16 4250
121 63 2000, 3000 50 50 160 315 315 16 4250
145 20 1200,2000 63 63 160 315 315 16 4250
145 40 1600, 2000, 3000 80 80 160 315 315 16 4250
145 63 2000, 3000 80 80 160 315 315 16 4250
145 80 2000, 3000 80 80 160 315 315 16 4250
169 16 1200.00 100 100 160 400 400 20 4250
169 31.5 1600.00 100 100 160 400 400 20 4250
169 40 2000.00 100 100 160 400 400 20 4250
169 50 2000 100 100 160 400 400 20 4250
169 63 2000.00 100 100 160 400 400 20 4250
242 31.5 1600,2000,3000 160 160 200 400 400 20 4250
242 40.0 2000, 3000 160 160 200 400 400 20 4250
242 50.0 2000.00 160 160 200 400 400 20 4250
242 63.0 2000, 3000 160 160 200 400 400 20 4250
362 40.0 2000, 3000 250 250 315 500 500 25 4250
362 63 2000 250 250 315 500 500 25 4250
550 40 2000, 3000 400 400 500 500 500
550 63 3000 400 400 500 500 500
800 40 2000, 3000 500 500 500 500 500
800 63 3000 500 500 500 500 500

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table B-l Station Class MOV Surge Arrester Characteristics

MCOV FOW Discharge Peak KV at Indicated Impulse Current for an 8/20 Wave SSP
kV, rms kV, rms kV.peak 1.5KA 3kA 5kA 10 kA 20 kA 40 kA kV, Peak
3 2.55 9.1 6.9 7.2 7.5 8.0 9.0 10.3 6.3
6 5.10 17.9 13.6 14.2 14.8 15.8 17.7 20.3 12.4
9 7.65 26.6 20.2 21.1 22.0 23.5 26.4 30.2 18.4

10 8.40 29.3 22.2 23.3 24.2 25.9 29.1 33.3 20.3

12 10.20 35.5 26.9 28.2 29.4 31.4 35.2 40.4 24.6
15 12.70 44.2 33.5 35.1 36.6 39.1 43.9 50.3 30.6
18 15.30 53.3 40.4 42.3 44.1 47.1 52.8 60.6 36.8

21 17.00 59.1 44.8 46.9 48.9 52.3 58.7 67.2 40.9

24 19.50 67.8 51.4 53.8 56.1 60.0 67.3 77.1 46.9
27 22.00 76.5 58.0 60.8 63.3 67.7 75.9 87.0 52.9
30 24.40 84.9 64.3 67.4 70.3 75.1 84.2 96.5 58.7
36 29.00 101.0 76.4 80.0 83.4 89.2 100.0 115.0 69.7
39 31.50 110.0 83.0 86.9 90.6 96.9 109.0 125.0 75.8
45 36.50 128.0 96.8 102.0 106.0 113.0 127.0 146.0 88.3
48 39.00 136.0 103.0 108.0 113.0 120.0 135.0 155.0 93.8

54 42.00 135.0 105.0 112.0 115.0 122.0 136.0 151.0 98.0

60 48.00 154.0 120.0 127.0 131.0 139.0 155.0 173.0 110.0
72 57.00 183.0 142.0 151.0 156.0 165.0 184.0 205.0 131.0
90 70.00 223.0 174.0 184.0 190.0 202.0 226.0 251.0 161.0
90 70.00 236.0 185.0 195.0 202.0 214.0 237.0 266.0 169.0
96 74.00 242.0 190.0 201.0 208.0 220.0 245.0 274.0 175.0
108 76.00 267.0 209.0 221.0 229.0 243.0 271.0 301.0 193.0
108 84.00 279.0 219.0 232.0 239.0 254.0 284.0 316.0 202.0

120 98.00 311.0 244.0 257.0 266.0 283.0 315.0 351.0 231.0
132 106.00 340.0 264.0 280.0 289.0 306.0 342.0 381.0 249.0
144 115.00 368.0 287.0 303.0 314.0 332.0 369.0 413.0 271.0
168 131.00 418.0 326.0 345.0 357.0 379.0 421.0 470.0 308.0
172 140.00 446.0 348.0 368.0 381.0 404.0 448.0 502.0 330.0
180 144.00 458.0 359.0 380.0 392.0 417.0 463.0 517.0 339.0
192 152.00 483.0 379.0 401.0 414.0 440.0 488.0 546.0 360.0
228 182.00 571.0 447.0 474.0 489.0 520.0 578.0 645.0 424.0

Notes:
MCOV = Maximum continuous over voltage
FOW = Front of wave protective level
SSP = Maximum switching surge protective level

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table B-2 Intermediate Class MOV Surge Arrester Characteristics

MCOV FOW Discharge Peak KV at Indicated Impulse Current for an 8/20 SSP
kV, rms kV, rms kV.peak 1.5kA 3kA 5kA 10 kA 20 kA 40 kA kV, Peak
3 2.55 10.4 6.6 7.2 7.5 8.0 9.3 10.8 5.9
6 5.10 18.9 13.1 14.2 14.8 16.2 18.2 21.2 11.7
9 7.65 30.5 22.0 23.5 25.0 260 31.5 38.0 20.0

10 8.40 33.5 24.5 28.0 27.5 29.0 35.0 42.0 22.5

12 10.20 41.0 30.0 31.5 34.0 35.5 42.5 51.0 27.5
15 12.70 61.0 37.0 39.5 42.0 44.0 52.5 61.5 34.0
18 15.30 61.0 44.5 48.0 50.0 52.0 63.0 77.0 40.5

21 17.00 68.5 49.5 53.5 56.0 59.0 70.5 95.5 45.5

24 19.50 78.0 57.0 60.0 65.0 67.0 81.0 98.0 52.0
27 22.00 88.0 64.0 68.5 72.0 76.0 91.0 110.0 58.5
30 24.40 97.5 71.0 76.0 80.0 84.5 101.0 122.0 66.0
36 29.00 116.0 84.0 91.0 96.5 101.0 121.0 145.0 78.0
39 31.50 126.0 91.5 98.0 104.0 109.0 131.0 158.0 84.0
45 36.50 146.0 1060 114.0 120.0 126.0 152.0 183.0 97.0
48 39.00 156.0 113.0 122.0 129.0 135.0 163.0 195.0 104.0

54 42.00 168.0 122.0 130.0 138.0 145.0 174.0 210.0 112.5

60 48.00 191.0 139.0 149.0 157.0 165.0 198.0 239.0 127.0
72 57.00 227.0 165.0 177.0 187.0 196.0 236.0 284.0 151.0
90 70.00 280.0 203.0 218.0 230.0 242.0 290.0 351.0 186.0
90 70.00 294.0 214.0 230.0 242.0 255.0 306.0 370.0 196.0
96 74.00 303.0 220.0 236.0 249.0 262.0 314.0 379.0 201.0
108 76.00 335.0 244.0 261.0 276.0 290.0 348.0 420.0 223.0
108 84.00 350.0 254.0 273.0 288.0 303.0 364.0 439.0 233.0

120 98.00 390.0 284.0 304.0 321.0 336.0 406.0 490.0 260.0

Notes:
MCOV = Maximum continuous over voltage
FOW = Front of wave protective level
SSP = Maximum switching surge protective level

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table B-3 Distribution Class MOV Arrester Characteristics; Normal Duty
MCOV FOW Discharge Peak KV at Indicated Impulse Current for an 8/20 Wave SSP
kV, rms W, rms kV,peak 1.5 kA 3kA 5kA 10 kA 20 kA 40 kA kV, Peak
3 2.55 12.5 9.8 10.3 11.0 12.3 14.3 18.5 8.5
6 5.10 25.0 19.5 20.5 22.0 24.5 28.5 37.0 17.0

9 7.65 33.5 26.0 28.0 30.0 33.0 39.0 50.5 23.0

10 8.40 36.0 27.0 29.5 31.5 36.0 41.5 53.0 24.0
12 10.20 50.0 39.0 41.0 44.0 49.0 57.0 74.0 34.0
15 12.70 58.5 45.5 48.5 52.0 57.5 67.5 87.5 40.0

18 15.30 67.0 52.0 56.0 60.0 66.0 76.0 101.0 46.0

21 17.00 73.0 55.0 60.0 64.0 73.0 84.0 107.0 49.0
24 19.50 92.0 71.5 76.5 82.0 90.5 106.5 138.0 63.0
27 22.00 100.5 78.0 84.0 90.0 99.0 117.0 151.5 69.0
30 24.40 108.0 81.0 88.5 94.5 108.0 124.5 159.0 72.0
36 29.00 - - - - - - - -

Table B-4 Distribution Class MOV Arrester Characteristics; Heavy Duty

MCOV FOW Discharge Peak KV at Indicated Impulse Current for an 8/20 Wave SSP
kV, rms kV, rms kV,peak 1.5kA 3kA 5kA 10 kA 20 kA 40 kA kV, Peak
3 2.55 12.5 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 13.0 15.3 8.0
6 5.10 25.0 19.0 20.0 21.0 22.0 26.0 30.5 16.0

9 7.65 34.0 24.5 26.0 27.5 30.0 35.0 41.0 22.5

10 8.40 36.5 26.0 28.0 29.5 32.0 37.5 43.5 23.5
12 10.20 50.0 38.0 40.0 42.0 44.0 52.0 61.0 32.0
15 12.70 59.0 43.5 46.0 48.5 52.0 61.0 71.5 38.5

18 15.30 68.0 49.0 52.0 55.0 60.0 70.0 82.0 45.0

21 17.00 75.0 53.0 57.0 60.0 65.0 76.0 88.5 48.0
24 19.50 93.0 68.0 72.0 76.0 82.0 96.0 112.5 61.0
27 22.00 102.0 73.5 78.0 82.5 90.0 105.0 123.0 67.5
30 24.40 109.5 78.0 84.0 88.5 96.0 112.5 130.5 70.5
36 29.00 136.0 98.0 104.0 110.0 120.0 140.0 164.0 90.0

Notes:
MCOV = Maximum continuous over voltage
FOW = Front of wave protective level
SSP = Maximum switching surge protective level

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table B-5 Distribution Class MOV Arrester Characteristics; Riser Pole

MCOV FOW Discharge Peak KV at Indicated Impulse Current for an 8/20 Wave SSP
kV, rms kV, rms kV,peak 1.5kA 3kA 5kA 10 kA 20 kA 40 kA kV, Peak
3 2.55 . - - -
6 5.10 17.4 13.0 14.0 14.7 16.2 18.1 21.1 11.7

9 7.65 25.7 19.3 21.0 21.9 24.0 27.0 31.6 17.5

10 8.40 28.5 21.2 23.0 24.0 26.5 29.8 34.8 19.2
12 10.20 34.8 25.9 28.0 29.4 32.3 36.2 42.2 23.3
15 12.70 43.1 32.3 36.0 36.6 40.2 46.1 52.7 29.1

18 15.30 51.4 38.6 41.9 43.8 48.0 54.0 63.2 34.9

21 17.00 57.6 42.8 46.4 48.6 53.6 60.2 70.5 38.7
24 19.50 68.8 51.6 55.9 58.5 64.2 72.1 84.3 46.6
27 22.00 77.1 57.9 62.9 65.7 72.0 81.0 94.8 52.4
30 24.40 88.5 63.5 69.0 72.0 79.5 89.4 104.4 57.6
36 29.00 102.8 77.2 83.8 87.6 96.0 108.8 126.4 69.8

Notes:
MCOV = Maximum continuous over voltage
FOW = Front of wave protective level
SSP = Maximum switching surge protective level

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 APPENDIX C

EQUIPMENT TEST VOLTAGES

In insulation coordination studies the maximum switching surge voltages are

compared with the withstand voltages of the equipment. In order to compare the
withstand voltages, the BIL and other related data are required for the transformers,
circuit breakers, overhead line insulators, cables and other power system equipment.
Some of the critical data required for the analysis are reproduced from various
standards.

Circuit breaker test values - The circuit breakers used in the power system
applications are classified into two categories in the ANSI Standard C37.06,
1979 as general purpose and definite purpose [1]. The schedule of dielectric test
values for both categories are presented in the same standard. These values are
reproduced below.

Table C-l Schedule of dielectric test values and external insulation for ac
high voltage circuit breakers (4.76 kV through 800 kV).

Table C-2 Schedule of dielectric test values for circuit breakers applied to
gas insulated substations (72.5 kV through 800 kV).

Power transformer test voltages - The test voltages for the power transformers
are presented in Table C-3, from the ANSI Standard C57.12.00 [2].

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Test voltages for shunt reactors - The test voltages for the shunt reactors are
presented in Table C-4, from the ANSI Standard C57.21 [3].

Test voltages for gas Insulated substations - The test voltages for the gas
insulated substations are presented in Table C-5, from the ANSI Standard C37.122
[4].

Test voltages for oil-immersed transformers - The test voltages for the oil-
immersed transformers are presented in Table C-6 from the ANSI Standard 141 [5].
The values in the parentheses are for the distribution transformers, instrument
transformers, constant current transformers, step- and induction voltage regulators
and cable pot heads for distribution cables.

BIL for power circuit breakers, switchgear assemblies and metal enclosed
buses - The test voltages for the power circuit breakers, switchgear assemblies and
metal enclosed buses are presented in Table C-7, from the ANSI Standard 141 [5].

Impulse test levels for dry type transformers - The test voltages for the dry type
transformers are presented in Table C-8, from the ANSI Standard 141 [5].

Surge arrester - The withstand voltages of the surge arrester for various duties are
presented in Tables B-l through B-5.

REFERENCES

1. ANSI Standard C37.06, Preferred Ratings and Related Required Capabilities

for AC High Voltage Breakers, 2000.

2. ANSI Standard C57.12.00, IEEE Standard General Requirements for Liquid

Immersed Distribution Power Transformers, 1993.

3. ANSI Standard C57.21, IEEE Standard for Terminology and Test Code for
Shunt Reactors Rated Over 500 kVA, 1990.

4. ANSI Standard C37.122, IEEE Standard for Gas Insulated Substations, 1993.

5. ANSI Standard 141, Recommended Practice for Electric Power Distribution

for Industrial Plants, 1993 (Red Book).

6. IEEE Standard 1036, IEEE Guide for Application of Shunt Capacitors, 1992.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table C-l Test Voltage Values for AC High Voltage Circuit Breakers
Low Frequency Impulse Test 1 .2 x 50 Microsecond Wave
Maximum 1 Minute 10 Second Full Wave Interruptor Chopped Wave, kV Crest
Voltage Dry rms Wet rms Withstand Full wave 2 microsec. 3 microsec.
kV, rms kV kV kV Crest kV, Crest Withstand Withstand
4.76 19 N/A 60 N/A N/A N/A
8.25 36 N/A 95 N/A N/A N/A
15 36 N/A 95 N/A N/A N/A
15.5 50 45 110 N/A N/A N/A
25.8 60 50 125 N/A N/A N/A
38 80 75 150 N/A N/A N/A
48.3 105 95 200 N/A 322 288
72.5 160 140 250 N/A 452 402
121 260 230 350 412 710 632
145 310 310 550 488 838 748
169 365 365 650 552 969 862
242 425 425 750 675 1160 1050
362 555 555 900 975 1680 1500
550 860 860 1300 1350 2320 2070
800 960 960 2050 1540 2640 2360

Table C-2 Test Voltages for Circuit Breakers in Gas Insulated Substations

Low Freq Impulse Test 1.2 x 50 Microsecond Wave

Maximum 1 Minute Full Wave Interruptor Chopped Wave Switching Impulse
Voltage Dry rms Withstand Full wave 3 micro s Withstand Withstand V Withstand V
kV, rms kV kV, Crest kV, Crest kV, Crest kV, Crest (1) kV , Crest (2)
72.5 140 300 - 300 - -
72.5 160 350 - 350 - -
121 215 450 340 450 - -
121 260 550 410 550 - -
145 260 550 410 550 - -
145 310 650 490 650 - -
169 310 650 490 650 - -
169 365 750 560 750 - -
242 365 750 560 750 . .
242 425 900 675 900 - -
362 425 900 675 900 720 800
362 500 1050 790 1050 825 900
550 615 1350 975 1300 1050 1175
550 740 1550 1165 1550 1175 1300
800 860 1800 1350 1800 1425 1550

Notes:
(1) = With circuit breaker
(2) = Withstand voltage from terminal to terminal on one phase with circuit breaker open

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table C-3 Dielectric Insulation Levels for Class II Power Transformers
Induced Voltage Test
(Phase-to-Gro und)
Basic Lightning
Nominal System Impulse Insulation Chopped Ave Svvitching Impulse One Hour Applied Voltage
Voltage Levei(BlL) Level Chopped Wave Level (BSL) Level Test Level
(kV) (kV Crest) (kV Crest) Level (kV Crest) (kV Crest) (kV rms) (kV rms)
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7
15 and below 110 120 34
25 150 165 50

34.5 200 220 - - 70

46 250 275 - - - 95

_
69 250 275 _ . 95
350 385 - - - 140

115 350 385 280 105 120 140

450 495 375 105 120 185
550 605 460 105 120 230

138 450 495 375 125 145 185

550 605 460 125 145 230
650 715 540 125 145 275

161 550 605 460 145 170 230

650 715 540 145 170 275
750 825 620 145 170 325

230 650 715 540 210 240 275

750 825 620 210 240 325
825 905 685 210 240 360
900 990 745 210 240 395

345 900 990 745 315 360 395

1050 1155 870 315 360 460
1175 1290 975 315 360 520

500 1300 1430 1080 475 550

1425 1570 1180 475 550 -
1550 1705 1290 475 550 -
1675 1845 1390 475 550 -

765 1800 1980 1500 690 800 .

1925 2120 1600 690 800
2050 2255 1700 690 800 -

Notes: Columns 5 and 6 provide phase to ground test voltages for wye-connected
windings.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table C-4 - Insulation Classes and Dielectric Tests
for Oil-Immersed Shunt Reactors

Insulation Class Low-Frequency Test BIL and Full Wave Chopped Wave
Crest Crest Minimum Time to
(W) (kV) (kV) (kV) Flashover, micro-s
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
15 34 110 130 2

18 40 125 145 2.25

25 50 150 175 3
34.5 70 200 230 3
46 95 250 290 3
60 120 300 345 3

69 140 350 400 3

92 185 450 520 3
115 230 550 630 3
138 275 650 750 3
161 325 750 865 3

180 360 825 950 3

196 395 900 1035 3
215 430 975 1120 3
230 460 1050 1210 3
260 520 1175 1350 3

287 575 1300 1500 3

315 630 1425 1640 3
345 690 1550 1780 3
375 750 1675 1925 3
400 800 1800 2070 3

430 860 1925 2220 .

460 920 2050 2360 -
490 980 2175 2500 -
520 1040 2300 2650 -
545 1090 2425 2800 -

Notes: (1) = Wye connected shunt reactors for operation with solidly grounded
neutral.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table C-5 Voltage Ratings of Gas Insulated Substations

Substation Test Values Disconnect Switch Open Gap Interrupter Open Gap
Rated Field
Rated Tests Low Sw
Max Rated Low Freq Sw Impulse Freq Impulse Low Freq Impulse Impulse Low Freq Sw Impulse
Voltage B I L k V Withstand kV Withstand Withstand kV Withstand kV Withstand Withstand Withstand Withstand Withstand
kV rms Crest rms kV Crest rms Crest kV rms kV Crest kV Crest kVrms kV Crest
72.5 300 140 * 105 330 154 300 140
72.5 350 160 * 120 385 176 350 160
121 450 215 * 160 495 236 450 215
121 550 260 * 195 605 286 550 260
145 550 260 * 195 605 286 550 260
145 650 310 * 230 715 341 650 310
169 650 310 * 230 715 341 650 310 -
169 750 365 * 270 825 401 750 365 -
242 750 365 * 270 825 401 750 365 -
242 900 425 * 320 990 467 900 425 -
362 900 425 720 320 990 467 800 900 425 800
362 1050 500 825 375 1155 550 900 1050 500 900
550 1300 615 1050 460 1430 676 1175 1300 615 1175
550 1550 740 1175 550 1705 814 1300 1550 740 1300
800 1800 860 1425 645 1980 946 1550 1800 860 1550

Tabel C-6 - Impulse Test Levels for Liquid-Immersed Transformers

Insulation Windings Bushing withstand voltages

class and Chopped wave B1L impulse
nominal Hi-pot Minimum time to B1L full wave Switching 60-cycle 1 60-cycle 10 full wave
bushing rating tests flashover (1.2/50) surge level min dry s wet (1.2/50)
kV kV kV kV kV kV kV kV
(rms) (rms) (rms) Micro-sec (rms) (rms) (rms) (rms) (rms)
1.2 10 54 (36) 1.5(1) 45 (30) 20 15(10) 13(6) 45 (30)
2.5 15 69 (54) 1.5(1.25) 60 (45) 35 21(15) 20(13) 60 (45)
5 19 88 (69) 1.6(1.5) 75 (60) 38 27(21) 24 (20) 75 (60)
8.7 26 110(88) 1.8(1.6) 95 (75) 55 35 (27) 30 (24) 95 (75)
15 34 130(110) 2.0(1.8) 110(95) 75 50 (35) 45 (30) 110(95)
25 50 175 3.0 150 100 70 70 (60) 150
34.5 70 230 3.0 200 140 95 95 200
46 95 290 3.0 250 190 120 120 250
69 140 400 3.0 350 280 175 175 350
92 185 520 3.0 450 375 225 190 450
115 230 630 3.0 550 460 280 230 550
138 275 750 3.0 650 540 335 275 650
161 325 865 3.0 750 620 385 315 750

The values in parentheses are for the distribution transformers, instrument

transformers, constant current transformers, step and induction voltage regulators
and cable pot heads for distribution cables.

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.

 Table C-7 Basic Impulse Insulation Levels (BIL) of Power Circuit Breakers,
Switchgear Assemblies and Metal-Enclosed Buses

Voltage Voltage
Voltage rating BIL rating BIL rating BIL
(kV) (kV) (kV) (kV) (kV) (kV)
2.4 45 23 150 115 550
4.16 60 34.5 200 138 650
7.2 75 46 250 161 750
13.8 95 69 350 230 900
14.4 110 92 450 345 1300

Table C-8 - Impulse Test Levels for Dry-Type Transformers

Nominal winding voltage (volts) High-potential test Standard BIL (1.2/50)

Delta or Grounded
ungrounded wye wye kV (rms) kV (crest)
4 10
120-1200 1200Y/693 4 10
10 20
2520 4360Y/2520 10 20
12 30
4160-7200 8720Y/5040 10 30
8320 10 45
31 60
12000-13800 13 800Y/7970 10 60
34 95
18000 22 860 Y/ 13 200 10 95
38 110
23000 24 940 Y/ 14 400 10 110
40 125
27600 34500Y/19920 10 125
34500 50 150

Copyright 2002 by Marcel Dekker. All Rights Reserved.