Limited open reduction and Ilizarov external fixation in the

Title treatment of distal tibial fractures

Author(s) Leung, F; Kwok, HY; Pun, TS; Chow, SP

Citation Injury, 2004, v. 35 n. 3, p. 278-283

Issued Date 2004

URL http://hdl.handle.net/10722/48647

Rights Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License

 This is a pre-published version

The use of Ilizarov external fixation in the treatment of distal

tibial fractures

Frankie LEUNG Senior Medical Officer, Department of

Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The

University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Hau Yan KWOK Medical Officer, Department of Orthopaedic

Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Tsz Shing PUN Medical Officer, Department of Orthopaedic

Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Shew Ping CHOW Professor, Department of Orthopaedic

Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Correspondence and Request for reprints:

Frankie LEUNG.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of

Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Tel: +852 2855 4654 Fax: +852 2817 4392

e mail: [email protected]
Summary

We reviewed 31 distal tibial fractures (sixteen involving tibial

plafond) treated with Ilizarov external fixation. The study population was

composed of 19 males and 12 females, with an average age of 54 (range, 13-

80 years). The fractures were classified according to the AO classification:

A1 (3), A2 (6), A3 (6), C1 (2), C2 (8), C3 (6). There were 6 open injuries.

In 14 of the pilon cases, open reduction of the intra-articular

fragments and bone grafting via a limited incision was performed. Clinical

follow up averaged 28 months (range, 18-42 months). All but one fractures

united with an average healing time of 13.9 weeks (range, 10-20 weeks).

All but one patient with AO Type A fracture had excellent or good

functional scores. The 14 cases of AO C2 and C3 group had 6 good results,

5 fair results and 3 poor results.

This method yielded satisfactory results comparable with previous

studies using open reduction and internal fixation while decreasing the

number of serious complications. Its usage can be recommended,

especially in fractures with severe soft tissue damage and in comminuted

fractures.
Introduction

Fractures of the distal tibia are among the most difficult fractures to treat. The

short distal segment presents difficulty for the orthopaedic surgeon in choosing

the appropriate fixation method. The intra-articular group of these injuries, the

pilon fracture, is due to high energy trauma and articular comminution is

frequently present. The greatest challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon lies in the

relatively tight soft tissue around the ankle. The conventional method of open

reduction follows by plate and screw fixation provides good outcomes only in

the fractures with less severe, lower energy trauma [5-8,10,12,13-15,18]. Once

complications including wound dehiscence and infection set in, patients will

have a lengthy stay in hospital. Often they need multiple operations, and may

even end up in having amputation [20]. As a result, it has been a recent

interest in treating these fractures with external fixation and limited internal

fixation [1-4,9,17,19].

The Ilizarov principle of circular external fixation has been applied to fracture

treatment. The advantage in using tensioned transfixion wires is that in a small

bone segment, multiple wires can be inserted and tightened, resulting in strong

fixation of the bone. This is particularly useful in fixing the short distal
fragment in distal tibial fractures. The transfixion wire can bypass the area with

poor soft tissue condition and the minimally invasive nature of the surgery can

avoid catastrophic wound complication that may follow the conventional open

fracture treatment. There is no need to extend the fixation device across the

ankle joint and early range of motion is possible. This is particularly important

in intra-articular fractures where joint motion is important for articular cartilage

healing and nourishment [16]. The elasticity of the wire allows micromotion

during weight bearing walking and that will facilitate fracture healing. This

study retrospectively evaluates the efficacy of this method in treating distal

tibial and pilon fractures.

Materials and Methods

Between July 1995 and March 1998, patients with distal tibial fractures or pilon

fractures admitted to our institute will be treated with the technique of circular

external fixation and limited internal fixation if necessary. All open fractures

were treated on an emergency basis in the operation theatre with irrigation and

debridement, followed by fracture fixation. The timing of operation for closed

fractures depended on the condition of soft tissues and the likelihood of a

limited open reduction, which was often dictated by the degree of articular
involvement (Fig. 1). The affected limbs were put in plaster slabs and elevated.

The definitive procedure for fixation was delayed for an average of 2 days in

the extra-articular group (AO type A) and 9 days in the intra-articular group

(AO type C).

The operation was performed with the patient in the supine position on a

radiolucent table. The device was Ilizarov external fixator (Smith & Nephew,

Richards Inc.). with tensioned wires for the distal bone fragment. Preassembly

of the frame was preferable, as this would greatly reduce the operation time.

The operation started with the placement of a transverse wire across the talus or

calcaneus. The pin should be fixed to a half ring for distraction of the fracture

site. The pre-assembled frame was then applied to the tibia. A hybrid kind of

fixation using 5mm half pins for the proximal fragment was used in order to

minimize soft tissue impalement. 1.8mm wires were used to fix the distal

fragment and were tensioned to 120kg. Olive wires were used for reduction of

wedge fragments or for better alignment. The frame usually included 3 rings (2

for proximal and 1 for distal). The use of conical washers in connecting the

threaded rods to the rings greatly facilitated the reduction of the fracture. In

most cases, 3 half pins were inserted to the proximal fragment and 3 wires were

inserted to the distal fragment. The effect of ligamentotaxis on reduction was

assessed with the use of a C-arm. In fourteen cases of the pilon fractures, open

reductions of the intra-articular fragments via a limited open approach were

performed prior to the stabilization of the metaphyseal portion of the fracture. A

5 to 6 cm long incision was made anteriorly over the major fragments. The

ankle joint was visualized and anatomical reduction of the articular surface was

possible. Lag screws were inserted to fix the articular fracture. Bone graft

harvested from the iliac crest was placed in 15 patients (3 had extra-articular

fractures) to fill up bony defects or to support the articular surface. The

metaphyseal fracture fragments were not exposed. The surgical wound was

closed first before proceeding to the insertion of wires. The fixation of the rest

of the tibia was then performed in the above-mentioned manner. In two patients

with comminuted C3 fractures, the wire through the hind foot with the ring was

left behind for another two weeks to maintain the reduction by temporarily

immobilizing the ankle joint. In all other patients, the wire at the hind foot was

removed at the end of the procedure and the ankle would be free for movement.

The average duration of the operation was 126 minutes (range, 65 to 150

minutes).

Usually patients with extra-articular fractures were allowed weight bearing

walking as tolerated, while those with pilon fractures were kept non-
weightbearing for at least 8 weeks (Fig. 2). All patients were encouraged to

have early range of motion exercises. Clinical and radiological assessment was

done every two weeks until the fracture united (Fig. 3a to 3e). The fixator was

removed at an average of 15 weeks post-operatively (range, 10 to 20 weeks).

Results

There were 31 patients treated under the protocol. The study population

comprised 19 males and 12 females. The average age of the population was 54

years (range, 13-80 years). The fractures were classified according to the AO

classification [11]: A1 (3), A2 (6), A3 (6), C1 (2), C2 (8), C3 (6). Partial

articular fractures (AO type B) were excluded from the study since a rigid

fixation of the diaphyseal-epiphyseal junction is not necessary. The fibula was

intact in 5 patients.

There were 6 open injuries, and in 19 patients (61%) the mechanism of injury

was high-energy trauma, including fall from height, direct crush by heavy

object and motor vehicle accident. The average injury severity score was 8.3.

Ten patients had multiple fractures which included second long bone fractures
(4 patients), spinal fractures (3 patients), pelvic fractures (2 patients) and one

ipsilateral talus fracture.

Union

Clinical follow-up averaged 28 months (range, 18-42 months). All but one

fractures united with an average healing time of 13.9 weeks (range, 10 to 20

weeks). The only non-union case was a patient complicated with infection and

he would be discussed later.

Clinical assessment

In order to evaluate the pain and function of the subjects, a clinical scoring

system based on the one used by Teeny and Wiss [18] was obtained in 30

patients, excluding the one who had an arthrodesis. The results were graded as

excellent, good, fair, or poor (Table 1). The presence of intra-articular

involvement greatly affected the result (Table 2). In the fifteen patients with

AO extra-articular types A1-A3 fractures, fourteen of them had excellent or

good results and one had fair results. There was no poor result. The two

fractures in the C1 group also had excellent or good results. However, in the 14

patients with C2 and C3 fractures, there were all together 6 good results, 5 fair

results and 3 poor results.

Radiological assessment

Patients returned for follow-up visits at least every three months for the first

year and every six months thereafter. Serial radiographs were made and

evaluated for the bone healing, fracture alignment and the development and

progression of osteoarthritic changes. Degenerative changes were rated as mild

(one millimeter of narrowing of joint space), moderate (two millimeters

narrowing with small periarticular cysts or spurs) and severe (complete loss of

joint space with osteophytes or cysts). Only patients with C2 and C3 fractures

had radiographic signs of degeneration (Fig.3d to 3e). Out of fourteen patients

in this group, four had no changes, five had mild changes, three had moderate

changes and two had severe changes. The presence of moderate to severe

degeneration correlates well with the clinical outcome as all of them having

either fair or poor clinical score results. However, despite radiographic signs of

degeneration, no patients had symptoms severe enough necessitating an ankle

arthrodesis up to the time of follow up.

Complications

There were nine (29%) pin tract infection in this series. All responded to oral

antibiotics and local pin care although six of them had an early removal of the
involved pin as fracture healing progressed. Most of these infections involved

the wires in the region of the ankle. There seemed to be no correlation with the

fracture type.

There was one patient complicated with deep infection after the operation. He

was a 42-year-old patient who had an open pilon and ipsilateral talus fracture.

He had circular external fixator put on as an emergency procedure. He

developed pain and swelling at the fracture site and discharge from the distal

transfixion wire two months after the external fixator. He was diagnosed to

have osteomyelitis of the distal tibia and repeated debridements were performed.

The infection was under control and the fracture healed eventually with

subsequent bone grafting. However, there was destruction of the ankle joint

and subsequently the patient needed an ankle arthrodesis.

There was one case of skin necrosis in a thirteen-year-old boy who had an A3

fracture. There was initially some abrasion of the skin around the fracture

region which after the fixation showed a necrotic patch. Retrospectively, the

necrotic skin was caused by the jeopardized blood supply at the time of

distraction during fracture reduction. The necrotic skin was debrided and the

wound finally healed with granulation.

Two patients were found to have unsatisfactory reduction on follow-up and had

frame adjustment under fluoscopic guidance in the operating theatre. One sixty-

two year old lady had fifteen degrees of varus angulation, but she refused

further adjustment. Despite she had a malunion, she had an excellent functional

score at the end of follow up.

Discussion

Distal tibial fractures are complex injuries, not only regarding the bony

component, but also in terms of the management of the soft tissue problem.

Failure to recognize this often resulted in repeated surgery and even

amputations. In 1969, Ruedi and Allgower [13] reported a 74 per cent excellent

or good functional result when they reviewed 84 pilon fractures treated with

open reduction and internal fixation. Thereafter grew a widespread enthusiasm

for such technique. The four principles that they advocated [13-15] were: (1)

restoration of fibula length, (2) reduction of articular surface, (3) cancellous

bone grafting of the metaphyseal defect, and (4) Stabilization with a medial

buttress plate. While some authors [5-8] shared the same good results as Ruedi

and Allgower, others have reported less favorable results, together with a high
rate of complications. Teeny and Wiss [18] reported eleven (37 per cent) of

thirty patients having deep infection, and McFerran et al.[10] reported twenty-

one (40 per cent) of fifty-two patients having a major complication. Wyrsch et

al.[20] reported three (16%) amputations of nineteen patients having open

reduction and internal fixation. These reports reflected the fact that with

extensive surgical dissection in achieving an anatomical reduction, the

vascularity of the bony fragments are often jeopardized and these

devascularized fragments will act as foci for infection. The insertion of a bulky

plate into the tight soft tissue envelope of the distal tibia also impaired wound

healing. The incidence of skin slough and wound dehiscence was as high as

27% in the Teeny and Wiss series [18].

While anatomical reduction is still crucial in the reconstruction of the articular

surface, it is less important regarding the metaphyseal fragments. The biology

of the bony fragments should always be preserved maximally. The concept of

external fixation, when combined with minimal internal fixation if necessary,

can deal with both mechanical and biological aspects for better fracture healing.

Reduction is achieved largely through ligamentotaxis and extensive surgical

dissection is obviated. External fixation device spanning across the ankle joint

had been used with promising result [1-4,9,17,19]. A randomized, prospective

study on pilon fractures performed by Wyrsch et al.[20] comparing open

reduction and internal fixation with external fixation with or without limited

internal fixation showed similar results in the two groups. However, the latter

group was associated with fewer and less severe complications than internal

fixation.

The Ilizarov circular external fixation system provides the advantage of sparing

the ankle joint and allows early motion. The usage of tensioned wires is an

effective way to fix a short bony segment. Minor readjustment of the frame can

also be done as an outpatient procedure. This option is not possible with cast

immobilization, rigid internal fixation or uniplanar external fixation.

The current study yielded good results concerning the use of this technique in

treating AO type A extra-articular fractures. Fractures extending distally to

within 4 to 5 cm of the ankle joint can be satisfactorily treated. There was no

nonunion although three patients with comminuted fractures had primary bone

grafting. Early weight bearing walking could also be achieved in most patients.

It is extremely difficult to compare the results for the sixteen cases of pilon

fractures in this series with those reported in the literature on the technique of
open reduction and internal fixation although the incidence of major

complications in our series appears much lower. Radiological changes of

moderate to severe degeneration were noticed in 36% of our patients with C2

and C3 fractures. This may reflect the intrinsic difficulty in treating an intra-

articular fracture of the ankle joint. However, no patient in this series had an

ankle arthrodesis because of pain in a degenerated ankle.

Although the procedure was time-consuming and the safety zones for wire

insertion posed limitation on fracture reduction, its usage can still be

recommended, especially in fractures with severe soft tissue damage and in

comminuted fractures. The issue of whether fibular fixation is needed has not

been looked into in our current study, although we think that rigid fixation on

the lateral side may predispose to varus alignment during fracture healing,

especially in the case of marked tibial metaphyseal comminution.

References

[1] Bonar SK, Marsh JL: Unilateral external fixation for severe pilon

fractures. Foot and Ankle 14:57-64, 1993

[2] Bonar SK, Marsh JL: Tibial plafond fractures: changing principles of

treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2:297-305, 1994

[3] Bone LB: Fractures of the tibial plafond. The pilon fracture. Orthop Clin

North America 18:95-104, 1987

[4] Bone LB, Stegemann P, McNamara K, Seibel R: External fixation of

severely comminuted and open tibial pilon fractures. Clin Orthop

292:101-107, 1993

[5] Bourne RB: Pylon fractures of the distal tibia. Clin Orthop 240:42-46,

1989

[6] Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, MacNab I: Intraarticular fractures of the

distal tibia: The pilon fracture. J Trauma 23:591-596, 1983

[7] Helfet DL, Koval K, Pappas J, et al.: Intraarticular Pilon fracture of the

tibia. Clin Orthop 298:221-228, 1994

[8] Kellam JF, Waddell JP: Fractures of the distal metaphysis with

intraarticular extension: The distal tibia explosion fracture. J Trauma

19:593-601, 1979
[9] Marsh JL, Bonar S, Nepola JV, Decoster TA, Hurwitz SR: Use of an

articulated external fixator for fractures of the tibial plafond. J Bone

Joint Surg 77A:1498-1509, 1995

[10] McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS: Complications

encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma 6: 195-

200, 1992

[11] Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P: The AO Classification of Fractures.

New York, Springer, 1988

[12] Ovadia DN, Beals RK: Fractures of the tibial plafond. J Bone Joint Surg

68A:543-551, 1986

[13] Ruedi TP, Allgower M: Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the

ankle joint. Injury 1:92-99, 1969

[14] Ruedi TP, Allgower M: Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the

ankle joint: Results 9 years after open reduction and internal fixation.

Injury 5:130-134, 1973

[15] Ruedi TP, Allgower M: The operative treatment of intraarticular

fractures of the lower end of the tibia. Clin Orthop 138:105-110, 1979

[16] Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW: The biologic effect of

continuous passive motion on the healing of full thickness defects in

 articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone

Joint Surg 62A:1232-1251, 1980

[17] Saleh M, Shanahan MD, Fern ED: Intra-articular fractures of the distal

tibia: surgical management by limited internal fixation and articulated

distraction. Injury 24;1:37-40, 1993

[18] Teeny SM, Wiss DA: Open reduction and internal fixation of tibial

plafond fractures. Clin Orthop 292:108-117, 1993

[19] Tornetta P, Weiner L, Bergman M, et al: Pilon fractures: Treatment with

combined internal and external fixation. J Orthop Trauma 7:489-496,

1993

[20] Wyrsch B, McFerran MA, McAndrew M, Limbird TJ, Harper MC,

Johnson KD, Schwartz HS: Operative treatment of fractures of the tibial

plafond. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:1646-

1657, 1996
Rating Results

Excellent (>92 points) No pain, normal gait, normal range of motion, no swelling

Good (87-92 points) Minimal pain, ¾ normal motion, normal gait, trivial

swelling

Fair (65-86 points) Aching with use, ½ normal motion, normal gait, non-

steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, mild swelling

Poor (<65 points) Pain with walking or rest, ½ normal motion, limp, swelling

Table 1 . Clinical rating system according to Teeny and Wiss

AO Clinical Scoring System Total

Classification Excellent Good Fair Poor

A1 2 (67%) 1 (33%) / / 3

A2 3 (50%) 3 (50%) / / 6

A3 2 (33%) 3 (50%) 1(17%) / 6

C1 1 (50%) 1 (50%) / / 2

C2 / 5 (63%) 2 (25%) 1 (12%) 8

C3 / 1 (17%) 3 (50%) 2 (33%) 6

31

Table 2. The results of clinical scores according to different fracture types

Legends for illustrations

Fig. 1 Open reduction of articular fragments via a small incision. The

frame had been put on for ligamentotaxis

Fig. 2 Weight-bearing walking for extra-articular fractures

Fig. 3a A 36-year-old man sustained a C2 fracture showing the lateral

view

Fig. 3b Same patient showing the A-P view

Fig. 3c Post-fixation AP view

Fig. 3d 22 months after the injury. Lateral view showed mild

degeneration.

Fig. 3e AP view showing the same patient

Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig. 1 Open reduction of articular fragments via a small incision. The
frame had been put on for ligamentotaxis
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig. 2 Weight-bearing walking for extra-articular fractures
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig. 3a A 36-year-old man sustained a C2 fracture showing the lateral
view
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig. 3b Same patient showing the A-P view
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig. 3c Post-fixation AP view
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig.3d 22 months after the injury. Lateral view showed mild
degeneration.
Top
Frankie LEUNG
Fig 3e AP view showing the same patient