1985 - 1994: Windows and Office: Popular Electronics
1985 - 1994: Windows and Office: Popular Electronics
1985 - 1994: Windows and Office: Popular Electronics
Windows 1.0 was released on November 20, 1985 as the first version of the Microsoft Windows line
Microsoft released Microsoft Windows on November 20, 1985, as a graphical extension for MS-
DOS,[16]:242–243, 246 despite having begun jointly developing OS/2 with IBM the previous
August.[31] Microsoft moved its headquarters from Bellevue to Redmond, Washington, on
February 26, 1986, and went public on March 13,[32] with the resulting rise in stock making an
estimated four billionaires and 12,000 millionaires from Microsoft employees.[33] Microsoft
released its version of OS/2 to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) on April 2, 1987.[16] In
1990, the Federal Trade Commission examined Microsoft for possible collusion due to the
partnership with IBM, marking the beginning of more than a decade of legal clashes with the
government.[34] :243–244 Meanwhile, the company was at work on Microsoft Windows NT, which was
heavily based on their copy of the OS/2 code. It shipped on July 21, 1993, with a new
modular kernel and the 32-bit Win32 application programming interface (API), making it easier to
port from 16-bit (MS-DOS-based) Windows. Microsoft informed IBM of Windows NT, and the
OS/2 partnership deteriorated.[35]
In 1990, Microsoft introduced the Microsoft Office suite which bundled separate applications such
as Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel.[16]:301 On May 22, Microsoft launched Windows 3.0,
featuring streamlined user interface graphics and improved protected mode capability for
the Intel 386 processor,[36] and both Office and Windows became dominant in their respective
areas.[37][38]
On July 27, 1994, the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division filed a competitive impact
statement which said: "Beginning in 1988, and continuing until July 15, 1994, Microsoft induced
many OEMs to execute anti-competitive 'per processor' licenses. Under a per-processor license,
an OEM pays Microsoft a royalty for each computer it sells containing a particular
microprocessor, whether the OEM sells the computer with a Microsoft operating system or a non-
Microsoft operating system. In effect, the royalty payment to Microsoft when no Microsoft product
is being used acts as a penalty, or tax, on the OEM's use of a competing PC operating system.
Since 1988, Microsoft's use of per processor licenses has increased."[39]