Scribd
Upload
361 views2 pages

SBM Scoring Matrix

This document outlines a scoring matrix for assessing school-based management (SBM) practices. It assigns 60% of the overall score to improvements in learning outcomes, such as enrollment increases, completion rates, and test scores. The remaining 40% is based on assessments of SBM principles like leadership, curriculum, accountability and resource management. Schools are rated on a scale from 0.5 to 3 to determine their level of SBM practice as developing, maturing or advanced.

Uploaded by

Ysabella Andres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
361 views2 pages

SBM Scoring Matrix

This document outlines a scoring matrix for assessing school-based management (SBM) practices. It assigns 60% of the overall score to improvements in learning outcomes, such as enrollment increases, completion rates, and test scores. The remaining 40% is based on assessments of SBM principles like leadership, curriculum, accountability and resource management. Schools are rated on a scale from 0.5 to 3 to determine their level of SBM practice as developing, maturing or advanced.

Uploaded by

Ysabella Andres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SBM SCORING MATRIX

A. IMPROVEMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES 60 %

a.1. Access (Enrolment Increase) 45 %


a.2. Efficiency (Completion Rate, Cohort
Survival Rate, Drop-Out Rate) 25 %
a.3 Quality NAT 30%

B. SBM PRACTICES (D-O-D) 40 %

============
100 %
STEP 1 – DETERMINE PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

 Access - Enrolment Increase - (45%)


 Efficiency - Drop-out Rate (DR), Completion Rate (CR) - (25%)
 Quality - NAT MPS (30%)

A. Access (45%)
INCREASE ENROLMENT RATE
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 1 – 3.00% increase
2 Average 3.01 – 5.00% increase
3 High 5.01 % - up increase

B. EFFICIENCY (25%)
DECREASE DROP OUT RATE
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 0.01 – 2.0% decrease
2 Average 2.01 – 4.0% decrease
3 High more than 4% decrease

INCREASE COMPLETION RATE


Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 1 – 3.00% increase
2 Average 3.01 – 5.00% increase
3 High 5.01 % - up increase
C. QUALITY AND RELEVANCE (30%)
INCREASE ACHIEVEMENT RATE
Get the average of NAT for the last three (3) years, use the rating scale below
to determine the MPS.
Rating Description Indicator
1 Marginal 26 – 50%
2 Average 51 – 75%
3 High 76 – 100%

STEP 2 : Compute for Validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

CUMULATIVE SCORES OF
SBM PRINCIPLES WEIGHT RESULTS
VALIDATORS PER PRINCIPLE
Leadership &
30%
Governance ___________x 0.30
Curriculum &
30%
Learning ___________x 0.30
Accountability &
Continuous
25%
Improvement ___________x 0.25
Resource
15%
management ___________x 0.50
SUB TOTAL 100%

STEP 3: Compute for Final Rating

AREAS WEIGHT COMPUTATION RESULTS


A. Performance
60% 2.65 x 0.60 1.59
Improvement
B. SBM Assessment
40% 2.50 x 0.40 1.00
Score
TOTAL 100% 2.59
SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE ADVANCED

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE

NUMERICAL RATING SCALE DESCRIPTION


0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

You might also like