Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 135 views

    Seminar Presentation ON Bubble Deck Slab: Department of Civil Engineering

    Uploaded by

    Shinde vishal
    The document summarizes a seminar presentation on bubble deck slabs. It describes how bubble deck slabs replace inactive concrete in solid slabs with hollow plastic spheres, reducing weight by up to 50% and concrete usage by 10.55-25%. Literature reviews studies showing bubble deck slabs obtain larger spans with fewer columns at reduced cost, though they have lower punching shear capacity. Finite element analysis finds bubble deck slabs perform similar to solid slabs structurally. In conclusion, bubble deck slabs provide a more sustainable concrete construction technique.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Seminar Presentation ON Bubble Deck Slab: Department of Civil Engineering

    Uploaded by

    Shinde vishal
    135 views15 pages
    The document summarizes a seminar presentation on bubble deck slabs. It describes how bubble deck slabs replace inactive concrete in solid slabs with hollow plastic spheres, reducing weight by up to 50% and concrete usage by 10.55-25%. Literature reviews studies showing bubble deck slabs obtain larger spans with fewer columns at reduced cost, though they have lower punching shear capacity. Finite element analysis finds bubble deck slabs perform similar to solid slabs structurally. In conclusion, bubble deck slabs provide a more sustainable concrete construction technique.

    Original Title

    bubbledeckslabseminarppt-171124103336

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes a seminar presentation on bubble deck slabs. It describes how bubble deck slabs replace inactive concrete in solid slabs with hollow plastic spheres, reducing weight by up to 50% and concrete usage by 10.55-25%. Literature reviews studies showing bubble deck slabs obtain larger spans with fewer columns at reduced cost, though they have lower punching shear capacity. Finite element analysis finds bubble deck slabs perform similar to solid slabs structurally. In conclusion, bubble deck slabs provide a more sustainable concrete construction technique.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    135 views15 pages

    Seminar Presentation ON Bubble Deck Slab: Department of Civil Engineering

    Uploaded by

    Shinde vishal
    The document summarizes a seminar presentation on bubble deck slabs. It describes how bubble deck slabs replace inactive concrete in solid slabs with hollow plastic spheres, reducing weight by up to 50% and concrete usage by 10.55-25%. Literature reviews studies showing bubble deck slabs obtain larger spans with fewer columns at reduced cost, though they have lower punching shear capacity. Finite element analysis finds bubble deck slabs perform similar to solid slabs structurally. In conclusion, bubble deck slabs provide a more sustainable concrete construction technique.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 15

    SEMINAR PRESENTATION

    ON
    BUBBLE DECK SLAB

    PRESENT GUIDED
    BY: BY:
    Shivani Dr. Shilpa
    Sharma Pal

    DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING


    CONTENTS
    S.No Topic
    .
    1. Introduction-
    1.1  Solid slab
    1..2  Hollow core slab
    1.3  Bubble deck slab
    2 Example of Project
    3 Materials
    4 Advantages and Disadvantages
    5
    6 Literature Review
    7 Conclusion
    8 Scope of future use
    Reference
    NEED OF BUBBLE DECK SLAB
    1. SOLID SLAB

    INACTIVE CONCRETE
    (Central portion of RCC solid
    slab)
    Problems with inactive concrete-
    • Large amount of concrete consumption
    • Span limitation
    • Material wastage
    Solution
    2. HOLLOW CORE SLAB

     Pre fabricated one way spanning concrete elements


    with hollow cylinders, replacing inactive concrete.
    PROBLEMS-
     The elements are usually large and heavy.
     Rigid design and no flexibility of adaptation in the field.
     Large hoisting and erection costs.
    INTRODUCTION
    3. BUBBLE DECK SLAB

     The best solution for above two problems is Bubble


    Deck Slab.
     This slab is invented by Jorgen Breuning in Denmark
    1990’s.
     It’s a method of virtually eliminating all concrete from
    the middle of a floor slab, which is not performing any
    structural function, thereby dramatically reducing
    structural dead weight.
    MATERIALS
    PLASTIC SPHERES
    (hollow spheres made from recycled
    High Density Polyethylene).
     Enough strength (90% of solid slab)
    & rigidity.

    STEEL
     ( Steel reinforcement is of MS
    or HYSD can be used ).
    CONCRETE
    Concrete is made up of
    Standard
    Portland Cement with
    max
    WORKING PROJECT OF BUBBLE DECK
    SLAB

    Longer span, fewer columns

    Source- Google
    ADVANTAGES
    DISADVANTAGE
    S
    •Concrete usage is reduced as •Punching shear capacity is
    1Kg of recycled plastic low.
    replaces 100kg of concrete. •Skilled labour required.
    Hence this technology is green •Conventional slab is less
    technology. deflect than bubble deck slab.
    •Reduces the overall dead load •Load carrying capacity is less
    of structure & leads to 30 %to than conventional slab.
    50% lighter slab which reduces
    load on columns , walls and
    foundations.
    •Larger spans.
    •Lower the cost of total
    LITERATURE REVIEW

    S.N TITLE AUTHOR ABSTRACT CONCLUSION


    O.
    1. An experimental Nagesh The author •They founded that 50%
    study on bubble Hanche and studied the dead weight reduction
    deck slab system Arati Shetkar use of Hollow compared to solid slab ,
    with hollow plastic balls in less CO2 emission.
    elliptical balls. the reinforced • Less concrete required .
    concrete slab •Load carrying capacity of
    and its slab is depend on
    effects. arrangements of bubbles.
    2. Experimental Prof. Nishant To determine •Results shows bubble
    study on bubble Rajoria , load bearing deck slab carried less load
    deck slab Muhammad capacity and due to stiffness reduction
    Shafiq to estimate because of plastic balls
    Mushfiq amount of introduce in to the slab.
    (IRJET) concrete • 10.55-25% of concrete
    saved. saved as compare to solid
    slab.
    S.N TITLE AUTHOR ABSTRACT CONCLUSION
    O.
    3. An Neeraj Tiwari , To increase the • Continuous
    experimental Sana Zafar strength of slab arrangement of bubbles
    study on by using increase the strength
    bubble deck continuous and compare to alternate
    slab. alternative bubble arrangement.
    bubble • volume of concrete in
    arrangement in bubble deck ( continuous
    the slab and to ) are less required i.e.
    determine the 25% approx.
    deformation and •Conventional slab is
    failing less deflect .
    mechanisms.
    By using ANSYS SOFTWARE
    S.NO TITLE AUTHOR ABSTRACT CONCLUSION
    .
    4. Punching shear Reshma This paper •Compared to solid
    strength Mathew, compared the slab punching shear
    development of Binu.P punching shear capacity of bubble deck
    bubble deck slab behavior of slab is less .
    using GFRP bubble deck slab • They used GFRP
    (Glass fiber to solid slab by strips with various
    reinforced using ANSYS orientation as a
    polymer) software. strengthening system
    stirrups. which increase load
    carrying capacity up to
    20%.
    5. Finite element Subramania Analysis is •Voided slabs
    analysis of n, K* and performed using performed similar to
    voided slab with Bhuvaneshw ANSYS software that of solid slab ,
    high density ari , P on 6 specimens either by plate analysis
    polypropylene in which 3 are or finite element
    void formers solid and others analysis.
    voided. •Voided slab V30
    CONCLUSION
     Weight reduction is 50% compared to solid slab.
     Concrete usage reduced up to 10.55-25% as 1Kg of
    recycled plastic replaces 100 Kg of concrete, reduces
    CO2 emission.
     Obtain large span with less supporting columns.
     Punching shearing capacity is less so GFRP(Glass Fiber
    Reinforced Polymer) stirrups with various orientation is
    used as a strengthening system for bubble deck slab.
     Reducing material consumption made it possible to make
    the construction time faster and overall costs are reduced
    by 8-10%.
    SCOPE OF FUTURE USE
     Used for constructing all types of building
    especially Sky Scrappers.
     Best of larger span halls like theatres and
    auditoriums.
     Pedestrain bridge decks.
     Used in parking areas as less number of columns
    are required.
    REFRENCES
     Bhagyashri G. Bhade and S.M Barelikar An
    Experimental study on two way bubble deck slab with
    spherical hollow balls International Journal Of Recent
    Scientific Research ISSN: 0976- 3031 Volume: 7(6)
    June -2016.
     Churakov A.G., “Biaxial hollow slab with innovative types
    of voids”, Construction of Unique Buildings and
    Structures, ISSN 23004-6295.No.6(21).2014.
     Saifee Bhagat “ parametric study of R.C.C voided and
    solid slab ” IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil
    Engineering , Volume 11, Issue2, pp 11-21,2010.
     Kitjapat Phuvoravan and Elisa, D.Sotelino. “Nonlinear
    Finite Element for Reinforced Concrete Slabs”. J. Struct.
    Eng. 131(4).pp. 643-649. 2005.

    You might also like