Meaning and Concept Types of Takeovers: Unit - III
Meaning and Concept Types of Takeovers: Unit - III
Meaning and Concept Types of Takeovers: Unit - III
Types of Takeovers
Thomas Mathew
Unit - III
1
MEANING AND CONCEPT OF TAKEOVERS
4
The term ‘Takeover’ has not been defined under
SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and
Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 , the term basically
envisages the concept of an acquirer taking over
the control or management of the target company .
When an acquirer, acquires substantial quantity of
shares or voting rights of the target company, it
results in the Substantial acquisition of Shares
5
For the purposes of understanding the
implications of taking over it is necessary for us to
know what is the actual meaning of:
[i] Acquirer,
[ii] Target Company,
[iii] Control,
[iv] Promoter,
[v] Persons acting in concert and
[vi] substantial quantity of shares or voting rights.
6
1. Acquirer
7
2. Target Company
8
3. Control
9
4. Promoter
10
Promoter…..
15
3. Hostile takeover-
17
2. Vertical Takeover –
20
On November 18, 2001 the threat again raised for L&T
when RIL sold its entire stake to Grasim (A. V. Birla
group) at 46 percent higher price than market.(167 to
209/306)
On October 13, 2002 Grasim made a public
announcement of open offer to acquire 20 percent stake
in L&T at Rs.190 per share.
On November 8, 2002 the SEBI asked not to proceed with
this offer since it wanted to investigate the matter.
Further, on January 27, 2003 Grasim made a counter
proposal of vertical de-merger of cement business to L&T
board.
Grasim valued L&T’s cement business at Rs. 130/- per
share and made open offer to acquire control of the
cement business / company.
21
By April 2003, the SEBI came to conclusion that
Grasim had not violated Takeover Code, and
that its offer was valid subject to making some
additional disclosures.
However Grasim had got only 0.38 percent stake
in open offer.
But with the help of its subsidiary co. it
managed to get 15.73 percent of L&T equity
capital.
Thereafter, in June 2003 itself the L&T
management and Birla’s planned out a deal to
carry out a structured de-merger of cement
business of L&T . 22
It was decided that post de-merger, Grasim will
acquire the control of the resultant cement company.
[UlraTech]
However, L&T managed to retain certain key assets
like L&T brand, ready mix cement (RMC) business,
the gas power plant in Andhra Pradesh, and the entire
residential and office property of the cement division.
As a part of the scheme of de-merger L&T was allotted
20 percent of UlraTech’s equity.
The open offer by Grasim was meant for not only
taking control of UltraTech, but to give a chance to
FIs to bring down their stake, in the process making
heavy capital gains. 23
In acquiring L&T’s cement business, Birla had a
simple motive of ‘growth through acquisition’
After acquisition the combined capacity of Grasim
and UltraTech went up to 31 mn. tones, making
Grasim the largest producer in India and the eighth
largest in the world.
While Grasim was strong in the Southern markets,
L&T was strong in the rest of India. L&T’s strong
distribution network was very vital to Grasim to
push its own brands also.
24
On 2004 July 6 Larsen & Toubro and Grasim
Industries announced the completion of the
scheme of demerger L&T’s cement division with
Grasim having acquired a majority stake in the
company for around Rs.2,200 crore.
Grasim, which has cement brands such as Birla
Plus and Birla Super, was allowed to use the
L&T Cement brand till March 31, 2005.
However, the company decided not to use the
L&T Cement brand anymore and instead has
now chosen the UltraTech brand.
Along with Birla Plus and Birla Super, UltraTech
is positioned as a national brand ………… AND 25
26
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A MERGER AND A TAKEOVER
27
A merger involves the mutual decision of two
companies to combine and become one entity; it can
be seen as a decision made by two "equals". A typical
merger, in other words, involves two relatively equal
companies, which combine to become one legal
entity with the goal of producing a company that is
worth more than the sum of its parts.
In a merger of two corporations, the shareholders
usually have their shares in the old company
exchanged for an equal number of shares in the
merged entity.
28
A takeover, or acquisition, on the other hand, is characterized
by the purchase of a smaller company by a much larger one.
This combination of "unequals" can produce the same benefits
as a merger, but it does not necessarily have to be a mutual
decision. A larger company can initiate a hostile takeover of a
smaller firm, which essentially amounts to buying the
company in the face of resistance from the smaller company's
management. Unlike in a merger, in an acquisition, the
acquiring firm usually offers a cash price per share to the target
firm's shareholders or the acquiring firm's share's to the
shareholders of the target firm according to a specified
conversion ratio.
29
30