Please discuss the significance of the free-rider problem as it relates to the concept of herd
immunity. Is it possible to balance the rights of conscientious objectors to vaccination and
immunization with a duty to protect public health and safety?
In my opinion, the concept of free rider problem does hinder the concept of herd immunity for
public good. It allows free riders the choice of self-interest to avoid vaccines for various reasons.
Although, there are vaccination clinics and testing mandatory for vaccine related diseases, it
doesn’t cover the whole herd on the choice of immunization.
Firstly, it would require lot of exploration into the educational aspects of the use of vaccines to
protect the public. Secondly, exploring the misconceptions and fears of use of vaccines among
people. Thirdly, ensuring that follow up of patients who received the vaccines for any allergies
and side effects is essential.
David Ropeik (2013) discuss four conventional responses to the free rider problem participation
mandates, exclusion, incentives, and social norms. He suggests to restrict the community and
social activities of unvaccinated children, thereby reduces others’ potential exposure to disease.
In addition. Incentives work best when aimed at health care providers (through insurance
payments) or at schools, to keep vaccine exemption rates to a minimum.
Furthermore, promoting a social norm in favor of vaccination by use of creative social examples
include stickers that talk about blood donation or prompts to tweet a health behavior throughout
your social network are favorable options to promote healthy behaviors.
References:
1. Ropeik D. (2013). How society should respond to the risk of vaccine rejection. Human
vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1815–1818. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.25250
2. Buttenheim, A. M., & Asch, D. A. (2013). Making vaccine refusal less of a free
ride. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 9(12), 2674–2675.
https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.26676