Bratasz 2012
Bratasz 2012
Bratasz 2012
Available online at
www.sciencedirect.com
Original article
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A broad category of cultural heritage objects are multilayer structures composed of organic, humidity-
Received 20 April 2011 sensitive materials – wood, animal glue, paper, leather, bone or paints. They respond to variations in
Accepted 23 January 2012 relative humidity (RH) in their environment by cyclically gaining and losing moisture, and consequently
Available online 3 March 2012
swelling and shrinking. Differences in the moisture response of the materials induce internal stresses
in the individual layers of the structures, which cause objects to deform and crack. Polychrome wood
Keywords: is examined in detail. The cumulative physical damage of the design layer on wood due to repeated RH
Climate change
variations is quantified in terms of their magnitude and number of times they occur. The climatological
Relative humidity
Painted wood
risk index for accumulated, ‘fatigue’ damage is established, using a procedure to reduce irregular real-
Damage world climate histories into simple RH cycles of known damage impact. Using output from the Hadley
Risk index Model (HadCM3) and simple transfer functions predicting indoor temperature and RH from outdoor
climate, changes in the indoor climate through to 2100 were forecast for unheated buildings. European
maps highlighting the areas in which painted wood may be significantly affected by climate change are
presented.
© 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
1296-2074/$ – see front matter © 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.culher.2012.01.013
366 Ł. Bratasz et al. / Journal of Cultural Heritage 13 (2012) 365–370
its grain. Restraint may result from rigid construction restricting A2(a) emission scenario which represents a very heterogeneous
wood’s movement like framing of a painting or an ill-designed rigid world characterised by a strengthening regional cultural identities,
structure (cradle) added to confer greater planarity and dimen- with an emphasis on family values and local traditions, with high
sional stability to a painting. Wood can also experience internal population growth [12]. The scenario gives pronounced changes
restraint as the moisture diffusion is not instantaneous and the in future climate. Detailed justification for using this model to
outer parts of the wood respond dimensionally more quickly than assess the overall risk posed to monumental heritage by climate
the interior to variations in ambient RH. Analysis of the described change, and information on the methodology of mapping predicted
stress sources in restrained wood substrates is a separate issue, damage for Europe is contained in Ref. [3], an outcome of a larger
which is outside the scope of this paper. European project, NOAH’s ARK. 30-day averages of temperature
and RH were used to estimate the indoor climate for three 30-year
3. Materials and methods periods: 1961–1990 (baseline), 2010–2039 (near future) and
2070–2099 (far future).
To produce specimens imitating historic panel paintings, lime
wood substrates 10 mm thick were sized with rabbit-skin glue and 4. Results and discussion
coated with gesso composed of the same glue and ground chalk
(the pigment) at pigment-volume concentration (PVC) of 92% com- 4.1. Structural response of painted wood to variations in ambient
monly used in the restoration of panel paintings: the thickness of relative humidity
the dried gesso layer was approximately 0.5 mm.
Cycles of elongation in the gesso were produced by mechanically 4.1.1. Critical elongations causing damage of the design layer
stretching and compressing the specimens, at selected ampli- The DSPI technique can provide quantitative information about
tudes, which imitated dimensional changes induced by repetitive the number of cracks in the design layer on wood and their length
fluctuations of RH. The frequency of the elongation cycles was [5,6]. Consequently, an assessment of the cumulative damage to
approximately 0.3 Hz, and the specimens were subjected up to the layer as a function of the number of gesso elongation cycles was
36,500 cycles, equivalent to approximately 100 years of diurnal possible. Plots of the cumulative crack length versus the number
climatic fluctuations producing the same elongation. An exten- of stretching cycles were determined for a range of elongations
someter continuously monitored the elongation in the specimens. between 0.0015 and 0.005. For elongation of 0.0015, no fracture
The experiments were conducted under a constant RH of 50% in gesso appeared after the maximum number of 36,500 cycles
maintained in the laboratory. The specimens were taken out after applied, whereas elongation of 0.0025 produced first cracking after
a predetermined number of elongation cycles and the fracture 5000 cycles only (Fig. 1). The results obtained allow plotting an
development in the gesso was recorded using digital speckle pat- S-N curve where S is the elongation (strain) leading to fracture and
tern interferometry (DSPI), which is capable of monitoring physical N is the number of cycles to cause the first incidence of fracture
damage at the micro-level before it is discernible visually. Further at that elongation (Fig. 2). The general curve shape is sigmoid,
details of the experimental approach used can be found in refer- starting from the elongation for fracture in a single cycle or a few
ences [5,6]. cycles, and dropping to a plateau where cyclic elongation can be
The critical elongation values were translated into the critical tolerated for up to 36,500 cycles, equivalent to 100 years of diurnal
magnitudes of RH variations necessary to cause these elongations elongation cycles. The elongation of 0.002 was assumed to be
by using the swelling/shrinkage responses of wood [7] and gesso close to that value. Thus, the elongation tolerable at the maximum
[8] determined experimentally. number of cycles was approximately 1/3 of the single cycle fracture
Climate predictions for the future have been extracted from the elongation.
output of two widely used models from the Hadley Centre, UK: It should be noted at this point, that the levels of elongation
HadCM3 and HadRM3. HadCM3 is a coupled ocean-atmosphere at which the first incidence of fracturing on undamaged gesso
global circulation model with a grid resolution of 2.5 × 3.75◦ i.e. appears, were accepted as the critical ones. This accepted criterion
278 × 295 km2 at 45◦ N latitude [9–11]. HadRM3 is a regional of damage is very conservative, as design layers on wooden historic
climate model, which encompasses Europe at a higher resolution
(a grid of equal-area cells, 50 × 50 km2 ) but spans only the years
2070 to 2099. The model outputs used in this work relied on the
Fig. 4. Indoor temperature and relative humidity (RH) in a room in the Teutonic
Knights Castle in Malbork, Poland during period January 2006 to July 2007. Measured Fig. 6. Indoor relative humidity (RH) predicted for the period of 2070–2099 from
and predicted 30-day central moving averages calculated of the data points recorded the HadCM3 climate model. Plot of 30-day averages (upper part) is compared with
every five minutes in the two adjacent 15-day periods. the set of simple cycles (bottom part) obtained by the rainflow analysis.
Ł. Bratasz et al. / Journal of Cultural Heritage 13 (2012) 365–370 369
Fig. 8. Climatological risk index to painted wood mapped over Europe for
2070–2099 derived from HadRM3 output under the A2 scenario.
Fig. 7. Histogram showing the number of times single cycles of various sizes occur.
Outcome of the rainflow analysis of time-series of 30-day relative humidity (RH)
averages for three periods indicated.
detailed insight into the damage potential of the RH variations [4] M.F. Mecklenburg, C.S. Tumosa, D. Erhardt, Structural response of painted wood
allowed the definition of a climatological risk index based on the surfaces to changes in ambient relative humidity, in: V. Dorge, F.C. Howlett
(Eds.), Painted Wood: History and Conservation, The Getty Conservation
number and the magnitude of the variations of the 30-day RH Institute, Los Angeles, 1998, pp. 464–483.
averages. The index is calculated as a yearly ‘dose’ or accumulated [5] R. Kozłowski, Ł. Bratasz, Ł. Lasyk, M. Łukomski, Allowable microclimatic vari-
fatigue damage of the pictorial layer from the real-world climatic ations for painted wood: direct tracing of damage development, in: A.S.
Chui, A. Phenix (Eds.), Proceedings of Symposium ‘Facing the Challenges of
variations measured or predicted by the climate change scenarios. Panel Paintings Conservation: Trends, Treatments and Training’, Los Ange-
As historic painted wooden objects are preserved indoors, transfer les, May 17–18 2009, The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 2011,
functions predicting indoor climatic parameters from outdoor pp. 158–164.
[6] Ł. Lasyk, M. Łukomski, Ł. Bratasz, Simple DSPI for Investigation of Art Objects,
climate data were derived for unheated historic buildings. The
Optica Applicata 41 (2011) 687–700.
output from climate models can then be used to predict the future [7] Ł. Bratasz, R. Kozłowski, A. Kozłowska, B. Rachwał, Sorption of moisture and
threat to painted wood indoors. dimensional change of wood species used in historic objects, in: J. Gril (Ed.),
Proceedings of the International Conference held by COST Action IE0601 ‘Wood
The presented methodology is not limited to forecasting the
Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage’, Braga, November 5–7 2008,
damaging impact of future outdoor climate change on painted Firenze University Press, Florence, 2010, pp. 11–16.
wood. It can be also used to assess quality of climate stabilisation [8] S. Michalski, Crack mechanism in gilding, in: D. Bigelow, E. Come, G.J. Landrey,
in more precise way than offered by general climate classes like C. Van Horne (Eds.), Gilded Wood: Conservation and History, Sound View Press,
Madison, Connecticut, 1991, pp. 171–181.
ones proposed by ASHRAE [17]. The analysis can be applied to [9] T.C. Johns, J.M. Gregory, W.J. Ingram, C.E. Johnson, A. Jones, J.A. Lowe,
both natural climates in buildings with no active climate-control J.F.B. Mitchell, D.L. Roberts, D.M.H. Sexton, D.S. Stevenson, S.F.B. Tett, M.J.
systems and to artificial climates in buildings where active systems Woodage, Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with
the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios, Clim. Dyn. 20 (2003)
operate to control air temperature (heating), air temperature and 583–612.
humidity (air-conditioning), or ventilation rate. Similar indices [10] C.C. Gordon, C.A. Senior Cooper, H.T. Banks, J.M. Gregory, T.C. Johns, J.F.B.
were derived to assess climate quality in respect to risk of chemical Mitchell, R.A. Wood, The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat trans-
ports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments,
degradation or mould growth in cultural heritage institutions. Clim. Dyn. 16 (2000) 147–168.
Interesting examples of such indices are the isoperm value and the [11] V. Pope, M.L. Gallani, P.R. Rowntree, R.A. Stratton, The impact of new physical
mould growth hazard index used by the National Archives UK to parameterizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3, Clim. Dyn. 16
(2000) 123–146.
evaluate impact of the developed environmental strategies on the
[12] IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). IPCC Special Report Emis-
stored documents [23]. Another potential application of the risk sion Scenarios: Summary for Policymakers, 2000.
indices is evaluation of the harmlessness, or otherwise, of various [13] S. Michalski, The ideal climate, risk management, the ASHRAE chapter, proofed
fluctuations, and towards a full risk analysis model, in: F. Boersma (Ed.),
strategies for reducing the environmental control needed to ensure
Proceedings of Experts’ Roundtable on Sustainable Climate Management
good preservation of the objects, using less and simpler equipment Strategies, Tenerife Island, April 2007. The Getty Conservation Institute,
and lowering investment, maintenance and energy costs. In this Los Angeles, http://getty.edu/conservation/science/climate/climate experts
way, low-energy solutions can be safely introduced to make the roundtable.html. (Accessed 28 November 2011).
[14] S. Jakieła, Ł. Bratasz, R. Kozłowski, Numerical modelling of moisture movement
historic buildings sustainable so that even as the energy cost rise and related stress field in lime wood subjected to changing climate conditions,
and limits on carbon emissions are imposed, high standards of Wood Sci. Technol. 42 (2008) 21–37.
preservation are maintained with affordable and efficient means. [15] M.F. Mecklenburg, Some mechanical and physical properties of gilding gesso,
in: D. Bigelow, E. Come, G.J. Landrey, C. Van Horne (Eds.), Gilded Wood: Con-
servation and History, Sound View Press, Madison, Connecticut, 1991, pp.
Acknowledgements 163–170.
[16] L. Uzielli, Historical overview of panel-making techniques in Central Italy, in:
K. Dardes, A. Rothe (Eds.), The Structural Conservation of Panel Paintings, The
This research was supported by grant PL0086 from Iceland, Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, 1998, pp. 110–135.
Liechtenstein and Norway through the European Economy Area [17] Museums, Galleries, Archives and Libraries, Chapter 21, in: ASHRAE Handbook
Financial Mechanism and a grant from the Polish Ministry of Sci- – HVAC applications, ASHRAE – American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and
Air-Conditioning Engineers Inc. (2007).
ence and Higher Education supporting activities of COST Action [18] P. Lankester, P. Brimblecombe, Future thermohygrometric climate within his-
IE0601 “Wood science for conservation of cultural heritage”. toric houses, J. Cult. Herit., 2011, doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.06.001.
[19] H. Schellen, Heating Monumental Churches, Indoor Climate and Preser-
vation of Cultural Heritage, Eindhoven Technical University, Eindhoven,
References 2002.
[20] L. Samek, A. De Maeyer-Worobiec, Z. Spolnik, L. Bencs, V. Kontozova, Ł. Bratasz,
[1] Climate Change and Museum Collections, a discussion held on September R. Kozłowski, R. Van Grieken, The impact of electric overhead radiant heat-
17, 2008 London, edited transcription, International Institute of Conser- ing on the indoor environment of historic churches, J. Cult. Herit. 7 (2007)
vation, www.iiconservation.org/dialogues/IIC climate change transcript.pdf. 361–369.
(Accessed 28 November 2011). [21] D. Camuffo, Microclimate for Cultural Heritage, Developments in Atmospheric
[2] The Plus/Minus Dilemma: The Way Forward in Environmental Guide- Science 23, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998.
lines, a discussion held on May 13, 2010 Milwaukee Wisconsin, USA, [22] ASTM Standard E 1049–85, Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue
edited transcription, International Institute of Conservation, www.iiconser- analysis, 2005.
vation.org/dialogues/Plus Minus trans.pdf. (Accessed 28 November 2011). [23] S. Hong, M. Strlič, I. Ridley, K. Ntanos, N. Bell, M. Cassar, Monitoring and mod-
[3] C. Sabbioni, P. Brimblecombe, M. Cassar, The Atlas of Climate Change Impact elling the storage environment at The National Archives, United Kingdom,
on Cultural Heritage: Scientific Analysis and Management Strategies, Anthem in: J. Bridgland (Ed.), ICOM Committee for Conservation, 16th Triennial
Press, London, 2010. Conference, Lisbon: Preprints, 2011.