0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views15 pages

Group 7 SVC and Statcom

This report compares SVC and STATCOM technologies for connecting an offshore wind farm to an onshore grid via a subsea HVAC cable. SVC uses thyristor-controlled reactors and capacitors to regulate reactive power flow, while STATCOM uses voltage source converters. Simulations were conducted to determine the maximum cable length possible with each technology. Results showed a 100km cable length was achievable. SVC and STATCOM were presented and their operations explained. The report concludes with the optimal combination of compensating device and cable length.

Uploaded by

hamza mandlwi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
116 views15 pages

Group 7 SVC and Statcom

This report compares SVC and STATCOM technologies for connecting an offshore wind farm to an onshore grid via a subsea HVAC cable. SVC uses thyristor-controlled reactors and capacitors to regulate reactive power flow, while STATCOM uses voltage source converters. Simulations were conducted to determine the maximum cable length possible with each technology. Results showed a 100km cable length was achievable. SVC and STATCOM were presented and their operations explained. The report concludes with the optimal combination of compensating device and cable length.

Uploaded by

hamza mandlwi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Final Report

Mini Project TET4190

28.10.2010

Optimal Distance for connection of offshore wind farm with AC cable with SVC or STATCOM

To increase the distance compensation technologies such as SVC and STATCOM can be used.
Comparison of the 2 technologies and with these technologies what will be the maximum
cable length.

Group nr 7 - Project nr 4

Students: Hans Lavoll Halvorson, NTNU [email protected]


Kalle Teearu, NTNU [email protected]
Raghbendra Tiwari, NTNU [email protected]

Contact person: Kamran Sharifabadi, Statkraft [email protected]

Professor: Tore Marvin Undeland [email protected]

1
Content

Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3
SVC – presentation of technology ......................................................................................... 3
STATCOM – presentation of technology .............................................................................. 4
Subsea Cable .......................................................................................................................... 6
Comparing SVC and STATCOM .......................................................................................... 7
Simulation results and discussion .......................................................................................... 9
Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 14
REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 15

2
Abstract
This report is the study of the behaviour of STATCOM and SVC in connection of an offshore
wind farm to an onshore grid substation with an HVAC cable. The study is based on
analytical and simulation analysis. The simulation is the expansion of the pre-defined models
of STATCOM and SVC in EMTDC/PSCAD and the results have been studied for the
improvement of voltage in steady state and the change in the reactive power in the system
with different lengths of HVAC cable. The report also depicts the principle of operation of
STATCOM and SVC and concludes for the combination of compensating device and the
length of the cable.

Index Terms—SVC, STATCOM, HVAC Cable, wind farm, EMTDC/PSCAD

Introduction
Many companies are looking into the possibilities of establishing large offshore wind parks,
and connecting them to onshore grids. FACTS units together with HVAC subsea cables make
an interesting alternative to HVDC. This paper looks shortly at the maximum distance of a
subsea cable and the two compensation technologies SVC and STATCOM. The goal is to
transmit power from a 700MW wind park, on a 400kV cable. Results show that a 100km
cable is possible.
Subsea cable
700MVA
offshore Power grid
wind farm

FACTS

SVC – presentation of technology


This part speaks briefly about one of the reactive power compensation methods, called Static
Var Compensator, which by definition is a static var generator whose output is varied so as to
maintain or control specific parameters of electric power system. [2] First option is variable
impedance type static var generators which as the name states change their impedance as a
result of changing system properties. To control reactive power flow through the cable and
avoid too high voltages, it is needed to use different variations of reactive elements in
different configuration. Shunt compensation is used to increase the maximum power that can
be transmitted through a cable. In the case of a wind farm, it is needed to have the area of
regulating the reactive power. That means the reactive components should be controllable. In
theory four types of static var generators are used.

First of these is the Thyristor Controlled Reactor (TCR). The current in the reactor can be
controlled by the firing delay angle of the thyristor bank. When the angle α is equal to zero
then the compensator is called Thyristor Switched Reactor. TSR just switches after every half
period.

3
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of SVC [4]

As an opposite of that the Thyristor Switched Capacitors are used. Although the capacitor is
the main part of the SVC, there is also inductor (reactor) in parallel to limit the surge current.
Because of the switching transients TSC can be switched only when current is 0. Therefore
firing delay angle is not used here. Hence TSC is used as an admittance which is either
connecter or disconnected from the power system.

Also Fixed Capacitor, Thyristor-Controlled Reactor type var generators are used. This is
basically capacitor bank in parallel with TSR. By changing the angle α of the thyristor bank
on the reactor side we change the total amount of reactive power flow to network. Since
capacitor has constant output at all times it is the reactor side that controls the total amount of
reactive output to the network. To decrease the capacitive output, the current in the reactor is
increased by decreasing delay angle α. From the point where α is equal to zero going on, it
appears that the bank is going to have larger inductive current than capacitive current. This
means inductive var output to the network.

Thyristor-Switched Capacitor, Thyristor-Controlled Reactor (TSC-TCR) banks are basically


number of capacitors in parallel, one of these parallel elements is reactor which is used to
smooth the reactive current output. This works as the previous (FC-TCR), but for smaller
losses on the standby mode it has the possibility of turning off some capacitance.

STATCOM – presentation of technology

The Static Synchronous Compensator or STATCOM is a device of generating controllable


reactive power directly, without the use of AC capacitors or reactors unlike to Static VAR
Compensators (SVC), by various switching power converters assembly. This FACTS device
was disclosed by Gyugyi in 1976. These converters (dc to ac or ac to ac) are operated as a
voltage and current sources and they produce reactive power without reactive energy storage
components (capacitor or inductor) by circulating alternating current among the phases of the
ac system.

4
Fig. 2 Reactive Power generation by a voltage sourced switched converter [2]

The basic operating principle of reactive power generation by a voltage sourced converter is
similar to that of the conventional rotating synchronous machine shown is figure beside. For
purely reactive power flow, the three-phase converted EMF V0 of the converter after the
capacitor unit are in phase with the system voltages va, vb, and vc. The reactive current I
drawn by the synchronous compensator depends on the magnitude of the system voltage V,
that of the converter voltage V0 and the total circuit reactance (transformer leakage reactance
plus reactance of the coupling Transformer) X:
V  V0
I
X
The corresponding reactive power Q exchange is expressed as:
V
1 0
Q V V2
X
The three phase output voltage is generated by a voltage sourced dc to ac converter operated
from an energy storage capacitor. The converter consists of either 6 pulse bridges or 12 pulse
bridges.
By varying the amplitude of the output voltages produced, the reactive power exchange
between the converter and the ac system can be controlled in a manner similar to that of the
rotating synchronous machine. That is, if the amplitude of the output voltage is increased
above that of the ac system voltage, then the current flows through the tie reactance from the
converter to the ac system and the converter generates reactive (capacitive) power for the ac
system. If the amplitude of the output voltage is decreased below that of the ac system, then
the reactive current flows from the ac system to the converter, and the converter absorbs
reactive (inductive) power. If the amplitude of the output voltage is equal to that of the ac
system voltage, the reactive power exchange is zero.

STATCOM has its application in Power quality improvement, improving Transient Stability
margin, Stabilizing grid voltages in wind farms and in other transmission networks after a
disturbance that is after the load changes or short circuit faults.

5
Subsea Cable
Laying very long HVAC cables at sea offer many difficulties, and a real life project would
have to consider important details like maximum weight load for cable laying vessels, axial
forces during laying, cable and jointing technology for the highest voltages, costs etc. Sheath
and armor current play a considerable role in very long lengths of cable. Different companies
have different methods of determining acceptable losses in a power transmission. An overall
more detailed approach must be taken. This report has a rather theoretical approach focusing
on the FACTS units, and the cable theory is just briefly commented.

The cables in table 1 are found from ABB cable catalog [3]. To transmit 700MW of power,
the 400kV single core 1000mm2 cable is chosen for the simulations. It has a current rating of
1290A at given circumstances.

Cross- Un Charging Current


Capacitance Inductance Resistance
section CU (Um) current rating
[μF/km] [mH/km] [Ω/km]
[mm2] [kV] [A/km] [A]
Three- 220
1000 0.19 7.4 0.38 0.026 825
core (245)
Three- 275
1000 0.18 9 0.39 0.026 825
core (300)
Single- 220
1000 0.19 7.4 1.35 0.026 1290
core (245)
Single- 330
1000 0.17 10.7 1.35 0.026 1290
core (362)
Single- 400
1000 0.16 13.5 1.35 0.026 1290
core (420)
Table 1 Assuming 20°C in seabed, 1m laying depth, 1Km/w thermal resistivity, max 90°C conductor. Wide
spacing single cores. ABB cable catalog [3]

A cable’s capacitance will produce a reactive current, Ic, lagging the useful current Ip by 90o.
Both Ip and Ic contribute to heating the cable when considering the cables maximum current
rating, In, which is limited by the cables maximum allowed temperature and surrounding
conditions. [1] At critical length, the charging current is equal to the rated current of the cable.
Ic = In. Brakelmann[5] provides that voltage swing should not exceed 10%, and phase
variation should not exceed 30o. Maximum power that can be transmitted to the receiving end
is 87% of the nominal power, when the two angles in the sending and receiving end of the
cable are equal and 30o.

Useful current Reactive current Reactive power


U
I p  In  Ic Ic    C Qc  3    C U 2
3

As we can see in the figure, reactive current will build up more and more along the length of
the cable, making the current distribution along the cable uneven. If not compensated, it will
be highest at the end of the cable. The optimal solution is obviously to place FACTS units in
the middle of, or all along the cable length to even out the current distribution. The FACTS
unit should stabilize voltage, and provide reactive power at different load levels. In this report,
end-compensation is simulated.

6
Fig. 3 Current distribution of an 100km long 245kV three-phase submarine cable, conductor 1200mm2.
Full lines: compensation at both ends. Dotted lines: compensation only in the onshore-station.
Thermal current rating: 1323A [5]

Comparing SVC and STATCOM

Both a STATCOM and SVC can be used to mitigate reactive power and stabilize voltage in a
long subsea cable. The two FACTS units have been shown to have different technologies, and
they work in different ways. The effects of these differences are shown and compared in this
chapter.

As the two following figures show, the STATCOM is superior to the SVC regarding the range
of operation with different system voltages and reactive powers. V-I and V-Q characteristics
are shown.

Fig. 4 V-I characteristic of the STATCOM (a) and the SVC (b) [2]

7
Fig. 5 V-Q characteristic of the STATCOM (a) and of the SVC (b) [2]

The STATCOM has a greater ability to mitigate transients than the SVC, as explained in
figures below. This is connected to the fact that STATCOM’s attainable response time is
significantly better than SVC, with time lag in the control systems of 200-300μs compared to
2.5-5ms.

Fig. 6 Transmitted power versus transmission angle of a two-machine system with a midpoint STATCOM
(a) and a midpoint SVC (b) obtained with different var ratings [2]

Fig. 7 Improvement of transient stability obtained with a midpoint STATCOM (a) and a midpoint SVC
(b) of a given var rating. [2]

8
STATCOM can easily exchange electric energy onto any suitable energy carrier through its
DC side. An SVC does not have such capabilities. When considering loss versus VAR output,
STATCOM has more losses than SVC. Future development of better semiconductors may
reduce and change this relationship. A STATCOM is smaller than an SVC, in view physical
size and installation. No large capacitor or reactor banks are needed.

Simulation results and discussion


PSCAD has been used to simulate a STATCOM and subsea cable. Subsea cable is simply
modeled as a PI-equivalent with half the cable capacitance in each end of the cable. Wind
farm is modeled as an automatic power controlled voltage source. The receiving grid is
modeled as voltage source. STATCOM model is found in the PSCAD example library
“statcom_6pls_pwm.psc”. There is a breaker between the grid and STATCOM that closes
1.5s into the simulation.

Fig. 8 PSCAD model for subsea cable and STATCOM compensation

Three different cases are simulated.

Case 1.1 - 700MW with STATCOM after 1.5s. 50km cable


Case 1.2 - 700MW with STATCOM after 1.5s. 100km cable
Case 1.3- 700MW with STATCOM after 1.5s . 150km cable

Generation: 700MW, 400kV, 60Hz.


Subsea single phase cable: 1000mm2 CU.
Per unit base parameters: 700MVA, 400kV.
STATCOM transformer: 100MVA, 25/400KV

9
Fig. 9 Reactive power of transmission line

The STATCOM is turned on, and needs some time to stabilize. The stabilizing time is linked
to the cable-length. Shorter cables have a bigger peak in reactive effect and less stabilizing
time as the STATCOM turns on. The delay is due to the longer time constant of the reflected
voltage through the increasing cable length. Reactive power generation in the cable is reduced
due to the lower voltage after switching on the STATCOM. This is the reason why the
amount of reactive power before and after is not constant.

Fig. 10 Reactive power output from the STATCOM

Longer cable means more reactive power must be consumed by the STATCOM. As
previously mentioned, the stabilizing time is linked to the cable length.

10
Fig. 11 Active power of transmission line

During the transient at STATCOM turn on, we see a fluctuation in active power. It is due to
the power drawn by the STATCOM and transformer inrush current. Due to the same reason
active power at the wind farm has the same fluctuations. As the cable length increases, a
power peak after some seconds is being delayed.

Fig. 12 Grid voltage at STATCOM injection point

For long cable the grid voltage is high prior to STATCOM turn on. STATCOM stabilizes the
voltage by drawing the surplus reactive power in the system. If a very short cable is
simulated, the voltage will be low prior to STATCOM turn on. The STATCOM will stabilize
the voltage by compensating the deficit of reactive power.

The simulation results show very much ripple in the current. The reason for this may be
tuning issues with the STATCOM, or unfortunate relationships between capacitances in the
STATCOM and cable. Further study of this is required. In PSCAD replacing the STATCOM

11
capacitance with bigger or smaller capacitances doesn’t influence the result. Replacing it with
PSCAD voltage source may be a possibility, but this needs further studies and tuning of the
model.

Fig. 13 Phase angles at sending and receiving end

The phase angels are changed slightly, but not significantly.

Simulation results SVC


PSCAD model “tcr_tsc.psc” in the example library has been amended to include subsea cable
as in the STATCOM model. Before turning on the SVC at t=1.5s, voltages and reactive
effects in the cable are measured to be equal to the STATCOM model. As the results show,
heavy oscillating is observed when the SVC is turned on. Different SVC parameters and
settings were tried, both at low and high loads and voltages, but the results where not as
expected. Further investigation needs to be done into the details of PSCAD’s SVC model.

Fig. 14 PSCAD model for subsea cable and SVC compensation

12
Fig. 15 Voltage for 100km cable - comparing SVC and STATCOM

In the SVC simulation, steady state voltage starts oscillating around its previous state. In this
figure it is compared to the voltage of STATCOM regulation. As STATCOM stabilizes the
voltage at 1 pu, SVC is making it oscillate.

Fig. 16 Reactive power in 100km cable

The reactive power goes from a stable steady state prior to SVC turn-on, to quite strong
oscillation after.

13
Fig. 17 Active power in 100km cable

Also the active effect on both receiving and sending end of the cable suffers from heavy
oscillating.

Conclusions

The steady state behaviour of STATCOM and SVC were studied in this report. When
using the pre-designed models of STATCOM and SVC from PSCAD’s library, it
appeared that the results of STATCOM were much more relevant to the expected
outcome. The STATCOM has been found to have quite good response to any system
voltages which may be higher or lower due to the surplus reactive power in the system
generated by the HVAC cables. It maintains the predefined grid voltage by generating
or consuming the reactive power. The other noticeable characteristic is the settling time
of voltage when STATCOM is switched on. The longer the cable, longer the time it takes
to reach a steady state value of 1 pu. It also limits the length of the cable in between
offshore wind farm and the onshore grid substation.

The SVC showed no stabilizing effect, in fact it caused worse situation than in
uncompensated state. Therefore we can say that the conclusion on SVC’s impact on the
subsea cable in our brief survey has no significant meaning and should not be taken as
reliable information. STATCOM however fulfilled our expectance in terms of voltage
stabilization, power transmission and angle theory.

Therefore, in this study, 100 km cable with STATCOM at grid end has been concluded
to be a best combination for a 700 MW, 400 kV off shore wind farm.

And, since the characteristics of the generating units of the wind generators have not
been considered here, further study has been proposed to make a better result and
conclusion.

14
REFERENCES

[1] Cigre 370. Integration of large scale wind generation using HVDC and power electronics.
Working Group B4.39. February 2009
[2] Understanding FACTS. Concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems.
Hingorani. Gyugyl. IEEE press. 2000. ISBN 0-7803-3455-8.
[3] XLPE Submarine Cable Systems. Attachment to XLPE Land cable systems – users guide.
Rev 5. ABB
[4] Benefits of SVC and STATCOM for electric utility application. Noroozian, Petersson,
Thorvaldson, Nilsson, Taylor. ABB
[5] Efficiency of HVAC power transmission from offshore-windmills to the grid. H.
Brakelmann. CIGRE.VDE

15

You might also like