WORLD VIEW FOUNDATIONS

www.wvfoundations.org
The prerequisite for action is the will and courage to be truthful.”

The significance of Alfred Rosenberg in the age of Jewish-American

The current campaign towards establishing a one-world-order under the hegemony of the United
States is a clearly ruinous one since it is directed primarily by the alien rulers of American policy, the Jews,
one of whose most serious faults is the sinister mediocrity of their mind itself. To illustrate this we may
begin by considering the religious outlook of the Jews, which is completely devoid of mythological value
and, rather, portrays the historical destiny of the Jews as the destiny of the entire world which will be ruled
by the so-called "chosen people" of the Jewish God, Jehova. Already in the late nineteenth century, the
English cultural historian H.S. Chamberlain had noted that the materialistic attitude of the mind of the Jewish
scribes is clearly evident in their transformation of the elaborate mythological speculations of the Sumero-
Akkadians into a mere historical record of the Jewish tribe itself:

The fantastically scientific ideas in Genesis, concerning the origin of the organic world, the profound
myth of the fall of man, the theory of the development of man upto the first organisation of society
[which was originally the mythical and symbolical conception of an imaginative people (probably
the Sumero-Accadians)] ... all that became `history' [in the hands of the Jews] and thereby it at the
same time lost all significance as religious myth; for the myth is elastic, inexhaustible whereas here a
simple chronicle of facts, an enumeration of events, lies before us. That is materialism ... with this
view of religion only practical ends are pursued, no ideal ones.1

This materialistic world-view of the Jews is reflected also in the fact that, right from the beginning of the
creation of man, the Jewish god proscribes through the strictest interdictions all attempts at a spiritual
approximation of man to the level of the deity. By contrast, the Indo-European mythology is throughout
infused with the sense of the divinity of man, whose 'atman' or individual soul is identical in its purest form
with the 'brahman' or the divine brilliance of the cosmos.
In the Jewish religion, the restriction of man to the limitations of his intellect and the total disregard
of the divine potentiality of the spirit makes Jehova a virtual dictator over an impotent creation, so that we
indeed find in Jewish monotheism what Alain de Benoist perceptively calls "the mark of a compensated
impotence". All efforts to develop the creative spiritual powers of man are discouraged by the jealous god of
the Jews, as we remember from the very first account of human life in Genesis where Adam and Eve are
banished from the Garden of Eden for aspiring to the knowledge of good and evil. The resentment and envy
characteristic of Jehova are indeed the trademarks of the Jews themselves throughout their recorded history.
Indeed, as Chamberlain put it,

Jehova is really nothing else but an old Jew, provided with enormous will-power and good
intellectual gifts, but thereby wrathful and vengeful and lacking in many respects the simplest moral
concepts: he allows every deception, every plunder and carnage, as long as this serves his little

1
H.S. Chamberlain, Foundations of the Nineteenth Century.
 chosen people or one of his special favorites; he is without any feeling for inborn human value and
inborn merit.2

Unfortunately, the infusion of the Jewish monotheistic religious sensibility into the originally
polytheistic pagan peoples of Europe through the intermediary of the new reformed Judaic religion called
Christianity in the early centuries A.D. caused the Europeans to adopt the same rigid intolerance and
despotism of the Jewish ethos in the form of a desire to bring the entire world under the yoke of Christianity.
However, we should remember that the new Semitic religion deriving from the Jewish tradition was for a
few centuries at least, especially in the Middle Ages, elevated by the original European spirit of selfless
devotion to a superior spiritual cause through the institutions of feudalism and sacred imperialism. While the
Renaissance was responsible for the wondrous recovery of the culture of the ancients, the first stirrings of
the rise of anti-aristocratic thought are noticeable already in the same era as radical Protestantism and the
Puritan ethic, which are at once judeocentric and commercially oriented movements, as Max Weber has
demonstrated. It is not surprising that the inspiration for the French Revolution indeed came from the
example of the 1776 Revolution in the land of the Puritans. The French Revolution in turn paved the way for
the ensuing democratic Liberalism which finally resulted in the horrors of modern economic collectivism,
communistic as well as capitalistic. It is significant that both these forms of economic collectivism were
crystallised by the Jewish intellect, the former most notably by Karl Marx and the latter by the entire Jewish
capitalistic rule of modern America. The unfortunate emancipation of the Jews in the nineteenth century and
their gradual domination of the West thus resulted in the establishment of two fiercely anti-aristocratic
movements, communism in the first half of the twentieth century and capitalist democracy, which is today
being proclaimed from every corner of the world as the only possible government of nations.
The last great effort to stem the brazen affrontery of the Capitalists as well as of their totalitarian
counterparts, the Communists, was that undertaken by the National Socialist regime. When we study the
political writings of Alfred Rosenberg, the National Socialist ideologue and Minister of the Reich, for
instance, we are immediately struck by the depth of his understanding of the nature and consequence of the
Jewish menace as well as by the remarkable strength of his resistance to it. The first and most blatant
manifestation of the proletarian Jewish agenda was that of the Marxist Communists. As Rosenberg pointed
out in his revealing essay “Jewish World-Politics“ written in 1924:

It signifies an unparalled tragedy that, in the middle of the nineteenth century, for the armies of
striving workers no great representative arose who, rooted, with all his veins in his culture, had
through his personality bound past and present in order to gift to the millions a world-view for the
future. But, in place of such a representative, an incomprehensible fate brought forth two Jews, Marx
and Lassalle. The occasion of giving a religious content to the justified workers, movement
conducting a battle for bare existence was missed. The Romantic Socialism of a Weitling was not
deepened but falsified into a plutocratic Marxism.3

Marx's Communism was just the obverse of the stock-exchange rule, the 'expropriation of the expropriators':

Instead of preaching a religious, freeing ideal to the enslaved, he threw a flat Darwinistic empty
world-view rubbish at his feet. Instead of setting up for him as a goal a real homeland and the
striving for a national culture, he taught him to hate the history of his people and believe in a
nebulous 'International'. This poisonous seed of hatred against one's own people has perhaps been the
greatest crime of Marxism against all nations.

Since the bases of materialistic communism and of plutocratic democracy are essentially the same
Jewish economic institution of the stock-exchange, the two regimes have often been able to work together
politically and economically. And now that Communism has faded as an ideological support even in Eastern
Europe, capitalist democracy carries on the Jewish International under the banner of Capitalist Democracy.
As Rosenberg pointed out, the 'present-day democratic governments are the consequences of elections. The
elections are in the first place influenced by the press. The press is in the hands of rich stockholders. And
these are today, in most countries. Jews.' All the major countries of the West have thus lost their 'historical
2
Mensch und Gott, 29f.
3
All translations from Rosenberg are from Alfred Rosenberg, Political Essays, selected and
translated with an Introduction by Alexander Jacob, Sussex: Historical Review Press, 2004.
national attitude' and are to be judged only 'in relation to the new centre of power of the Jewish finance and
its democratic-Marxist following'. Since the Jews are spread over most of the nations of the West, 'the
Jewish family-politics exerts for its part a foreign political pressure when the internal politics of a state
threatens to become dangerous to the ruling financial and profiteering spirit.'
Indeed, shortly after the start of the first World War, the Jew Trotski-Bronstein declared that the war
signalled the end of the “nation state“ as an economic system and the creation of a 'United States of Europe
as the basis of the United States of the World'. And in 1921 Rosenberg noted that “Capitalism, in pure
culture, has firmly laid out its marching route: the syndicate for the plundering of all European nations, in
the first place Germany and Russia, has as good as been founded.“ In 1925, Rosenberg confirmed that “the
present-day propaganda for the ’United States of Europe‘ which originates from the circles of the stock-
exchange and the Jewish press means nothing more than the logical continuation of [the] same exploitative
economics [as that of the British Empire] sanctioned by a politically strenghtened union.“ We must bear this
in mind when we observe the reckless haste with which former Soviet states seek to join the European
Union and its rather self-effacing ally, NATO.
It cannot be forgotten either that the creation of the Jewish world-republic is intimately connected
also with the creation of a symbolic homeland for the Jewry - even though, as you may know, the Roman
emperor, Titus, destroyed Judaea in 70 A.D. deliberately in order to curtail the subversive politics of the
Jews, while his successor Hadrian renamed the land Palestine after the second Jewish revolt of 135 A.D.
Using the customary Jewish threats of financial punishments and proletarian revolutions, Chaim Weizmann
boasted in 1921 at the Zionist World Congress that England would be sure to do the Jewry's bidding in
aiding the creation of their state since it “in its world-embracing glance has perhaps ... understood more, and
more quickly, than any other nation, that the Jewish question roves over the world like a shadow and can
become an enormous power of construction and an enormous power of destruction“. As Rosenberg reminds
us, the forced creation of a Jewish state has resulted in the alarming problem that 'in a country which has
been inhabited for many centuries by Arabs and is Arab land, the Jewry has been pressed in like a lasting
infusion of poison, as it were.‘ The British who witnessed the violence which attended their unnatural
creation turned quicky enough anti-Jewish but their protests and warnings were ignored under pressure from
the Jewish authorities in London and New York with the result that

today the Palestine is a fire-place which smoulders in the middle of the timber-work of the British
Empire. There two powers are crossed which are not limited only to the Palestine, for the longer the
fire continues in the Palestine so much more do the resistances against the Jewish tyranny in all Arab
states and beyond that in the other Moslem countries consolidate themselves. The English soldiers
believe that they fight for the British Empire, and they fight however for the violent injection of the
Jewish poison into communities with which Great Britain has to reckon.

As Rosenberg points out, this Zionist enterprise was indeed presented as an integral part of the British
Empire so that this “Jewish world power, supported by enormous financial means and supported by the
leadership of the proletarian revolutionary movements in almost all countries,“ was at the same time,
“decisively working at the collapse of the German Reich“, which had long opposed British interests as well
as Marxist ones. We need only substitute here the American Empire for the British and the fundamentalist
Islamic nations for the German Reich to see how the Zionist problem has continued to fester to this day
without any sign of a cure. With the total subjugation of Europe by America at the end of the second World
War, the Zionist dream continues to be combatted not by Germany but by some Islamic nations, which are
aided to a certain degree by Russia and a few other states that are not tightly controlled by the Jewish
American “Big Brother“.
But we must remind ourselves now that it is equally Europe’s responsibility to put an end to this
unnatural empire which holds it in its present drugged state of obedience. And it is here that we must turn to
the example of the Reich. According to Rosenberg, the only way to counter the Jewish international idea is
through the recovery of the racial and national idea:

This idea signifies the recognition of the idea of power and, yet, not imperialism. The first insofar as
the idea of power presents nothing else but the expression of the internal racial-national life-will and
the attempt to fight for its natural self-development, if necessary with one's life. Not imperialism for,
precisely from the conscious recognition of the actual personality-worth and of the special character
of one's own people - in the wider sense of race - follows also the actual evaluation of other genuine
 racial characteristics ... If the racial law succeeds in coming to an outbreak in Europe, this will have
an effect also world-politically. Germany for the Germans, China for the Chinese, that becomes the
world-political view from the racial conception of the state. The European racial pride would not be
affected thereby but, for the first time, awakened to true consciousness after it has been contaminated
upto now by the business mentality ... The realisation of the racial idea means therefore victory of the
national self-consciousness and of the idea of the state over economic interests and the raceless
financial dictatorship of individuals.

What we note here immediately is the wide difference between the racialism of the National Socialist
thinkers and the racialism of the so-called right-wing movements of today which are, both in America and in
Europe, heavily infiltrated by Jews and distorted by the latter into anti-immigration, and particularly anti-
Islamic, movements which seek to divert the natural hatred of the genuine patriot for enemies of the state
such as the alien Jewish overlords to weak foreign immigrants. This is the reason why so-called nationalist
parties such as the British National Party and Geert Wilder’s Partij voor der Vrijheid are not genuinely
nationalist but rather pseudo-nationalist factions supported by the Jews.

As Rosenberg declared,

the [racialism of the National Socialists] is not a preaching of racial hatred but a preaching of racial
consideration. It declares nothing further than that every person conscious of honour must pay heed to
his inner voice, through which he recognises that it is no accident if in this world men of different
colours and different minds live, and these men produce different sorts of states and different sorts of
cultures. Precisely this consciousness will produce also, through an inner respect for oneself,
chivalrousness of manners and respect for every genuine race, a chivalrousness which seemed to have
well-nigh disappeared from the earth in the last centuries.

We must bear in mind also that, already in the 19th century, Richard Wagner had noted that it was Jewish
agitators who used German nationalist catch-words such as "Deutschtum" and "German freedom" to deceive
the German folk and lull it into a false sense of superiority. In developing the European spirit today,
therefore, one should take care to avoid the temptation of self-complacency, of believing that every
European is "quite of oneself ... something great and needs to take no sort of pains to first become it".
Indeed, as Wagner reminds us, the fact that

Goethe and Schiller, Mozart and Beethoven have issued from the German people's womb far too easily
tempts the bulk of middling talents to consider the great minds their own by right of birth, to persuade
the mass with demagogic flatulence that they themselves are Goethes and Schillers.4

The regeneration of Europe can be undertaken only by cultured Europeans and not by counterfeit, and
exploitative, Jewish Americans or Jewish Europeans. This regeneration must encompass all spheres of social
life, for, as Rosenberg already noted in 1924, the Jewish international idea is all pervasive, so that politically
'this ideal is called a world-republic, economically a world-bank, culturally it is expressed ... in the rootless
Futurism, in the modern Negro music of our metropolises'. We immediately understand why negro hip-hop
music has become so ubiquitous today and so widely translated into every language of Europe, and Asia.
We may add to Rosenberg's observation also the fact that the motive force of the establishment of the Jewish
American world-order is 'frivolitas', the grinning insolence of the Jew which lures the masses into its casinos
and pornographic houses while concealing its criminal, subversive aims. Of the other numerous
manifestations of the deliberate brutalisation of the masses I may mention just a couple such as the now
fashionable football hooliganism and the revolutionary rhetoric of rock music. What is even more alarming
than the corruption of the masses, however, is the deliberate reduction of the so-called educated classes to
the same proletarian level in the opera- and ballet-houses of the West, where the aristocratic sentiments
expressed in the original music of Romantic operas, especially the Wagnerian, are trivialised and travestied
by repulsive and abstract stage-settings, and modern classical ballet dancers are compelled to ape the
negroid gestures of hip-hop street dancers.
In fact, as Rosenberg pointed out, 'capitalistic democracy could only live on the misery of the
peoples. It grew from speculation and corruption, from exploitation and racial disgrace'. Only an ideology of

4
R. Wagner, “What is German?” (1865).
nationalism can produce social justice. The task therefore before all serious politicians is to chisel out one
state after another from the international bank-state of the Jewish international stock exchange 'until that
usurious structure collapses which sucks the marrow of all the nations, and makes its power from the
strength of others'. In 1938, Rosenberg was able to declare that

Europe is today most consciously represented by two states: by Germany and Italy. Both have made
the cut between nationally bound interests and a parasitic politics and both have thereby produced the
preconditions for an organic relationship between the different nations. We hope that this relationship
of the old cultured nations of Europe will be comprehended increasingly deeply as our common
destiny and cannot any longer be prevented by anti-European Jewish interests.

As he proclaimed in 1940, “what the National Socialist Revolution means for all nations, for all of Europe ...
[is] the liberation of all European nations from the nightmare of finance-piratical system which was up till
now strong enough develop from its hand death-threatening powers of destruction“. Unfortunately, after the
disastrous second World War, the West has well-nigh forgotten the importance of the nationalism of the
Germans and the Italians during that war and the victory of the Jewish international interests in America
seems at present complete.
However, the Jewish rule in America slowly but surely strangles the cultural growth of America itself
through its narrow rational and commercially oriented preoccupations. For, as Nietzsche had revealed, the
Jewish social ethos is the very opposite of the European:

Rome found in the Jew the incarnation of the unnatural, as though it were its diametrically opposed
monstrosity, and in Rome the Jew was held to be convicted of hatred of the whole human race: and
rightly so, in so far as it is right to link the well-being and the future of the human race to the
unconditional mastery of the aristocratic values, of the Roman values.5

Chamberlain too had pointed out that the sociological predilection of the Jewish intellectuals for capitalism,
democracy, social mobility and modernism threaten the spirit of the Aryan, who is characterised by
"Innerlichkeit" and inner spiritual and intellectual freedom. Indeed, the entire thrust of a world order ruled by
Americans ruled by Jews is in total opposition to the natural socio-cultural direction of the Indo-European
nations. Unlike the Indo-Europeans, who have always relegated business endeavours to the lower ranks of a
society ruled by priests and kings, the Jews have never had any other concern but commercial rule over foreign
nations which have been debased through popular revolutions and internecine wars.
The weaknesses of American society are evident to every objective outsider. I may just recall to you an
early assessment of America as a democracy by the French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville who reported in the
second part of his book On Democracy in America, published in 1840, that

a nation cannot long remain strong when every man belonging to it is individually weak, and … no
form or combination of social polity has yet been devised to make an energetic people out of a
community of pusillanimous and enfeebled citizens.6

Even today, the chief political characteristic of the American order is not so much democracy in the classical
sense as, rather, a vulgar proletarian democracy, that is, democracy not through the real participation of the
most valuable sections of every society in the government of the nation, but, instead, through the mass
election of a few candidates presented to the public by big business interests. The primacy of politics, or the
cultivation of the nation, recedes in such a system before the brute force of finance, which begins to usurp a
political office which it is ill equipped to occupy. For, its main concerns are the proliferation of its own
commercial interests, especially in the international forum. Internationalism is thus encouraged for its own
benefit regardless of the damage that this causes to the individual national societies that are forced to enlist
in its order for economic reasons.
There is in America hardly any real education among the youth, since every effort at disciplining a
child is considered a violation of his rights, and mechanical computers and their many monstrous
distractions have annulled the importance of the traditional schoolmaster without having either the humanity
5
Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morals, I, Sec.16. The Roman reference is to Tacitus, Historiae, V,5,
and Annales, XV,44.
6
A. de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, tr. H. Reeve, N.Y.: Vintage Books, II:347.
or the discernment of the latter. True culture is virtually impossible in such a stunted society, and serious
philosophy and art are either totally shunned, or quickly and very "democratically" reduced to the level of
the louder, and commercially more successful, "popular culture". These evil effects of capitalistic
democracy are typical of a system that opposes the emergence of any clearly defining national culture. The
Jewish rule of America has thus resulted in an alarming emptiness at the base of a nation which presumes to
export its social and political model to the rest of the world.
However, the domination of the major channels of intellectual information by the Jews has not only
ensured their own academic and social supremacy but also effected a totalitarian indoctrination of the
American people. As Walter Kerr reported already in 1968,

what has happened since World War II is that the American sensibility has become part Jewish ... The
literate American mind has come in some measure to think Jewishly. It has been taught to, and it was
ready to. After the entertainers and novelists came the Jewish critics, politicians, theologians.7

Prof. Kevin MacDonald's recent study of the Jewish involvement in the intellectual and political movements
of the twentieth century ascertains that the Jewish pseudo-intellectualism actually works in a deliberate and
concerted manner against the organic world-view of the European in order to subvert and destroy it. The
various intellectual movements that the Jews have spearheaded in the twentieth century such as Boasian
anthropology, psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt School of Social Research, the New York Intellectuals and the
entire gamut of political radicalism, have served a Jewish agenda in higher educational and political circles
of developing "a fundamental restructuring of the intellectual basis of gentile society in ways conducive to
the continued existence of Judaism".8 The swell of Jewish ideology over the land has effectively contributed
to the decline of a homogeneous Protestant culture in the United States.
Unfortunately, the intellectual perspectives spawned by the chameleon Jewish thinkers has gained
currency in the larger academic and social arenas of America through the networks established in the elite
universities which subject all aspiring intellectuals to "a high level of indoctrination at the undergraduate and
graduate levels".9 Jewish-owned publishing houses eagerly propagate these pseudo-intellectual fashions, and
the media and Hollywood fan the flames of enthusiasm for such viewpoints among the less intellectual
masses. The real horror of this propaganda machine is that "these intellectual movements have been
fundamentally irrational"10 and marked by a thoroughgoing philosophical skepticism which has sought to
"impose a medieval anti-scientific orthodoxy on much of the contemporary intellectual world".11 But, unlike
the Christian medieval orthodoxy which was fundamentally anti-Semitic, the Judaic orthodoxy of the
twentieth century seeks to undermine all intellectual bases for the development of gentile organic collectivist
structures which might revive anti-Semitism. In the process of this monstrous thought-control of society, the
Jews have effectively destroyed both the social health and the artistic and scientific capacities of the Western
peoples amongst whom they live.
The most blatant evidence of the seizure of power in America by the Jews, after their long centuries
of co-habitation with the European peoples as slaves, subjects and socialists is represented by the infiltration
of the Conservative Party by the so-called "Neoconservatives" of present-day American politics. The
Neoconservatives are, in fact, neither conservative nor new, being old socialist and communist Jews who
moved from the left to the right under pressure from the blacks and other extreme left-wing groups impatient
with the exploitative mechanisms of the Jewish capitalists. We note once again the essential identity of
communism and democracy with regard to its leaders. It is not surprising that the paleo- or old Conservative
politician, Pat Buchanan, wrote in 1991 that it was the task of his conservative group to take back their
movement from „the neoconservatives ... the ex-liberals, socialists and Trotskyists who signed on in the
name of anti-communism and now control our foundations and set the limits of permissible dissent". As a
correspondent of the old conservative, Russell Kirk once noted, "the chief enemy of American conservatism
has not been the Marxists, nor even the socialist liberals in the Democratic Party, but the Neo-conservatives,
who have sabotaged the movement from within and exploited it for their own selfish purposes."12 M.E.
7
Quoted in K. MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.
8
K. Macdonald, Separation and its Discontents, p.x.
9
K. Macdonald, Culture, p.225.
10
Ibid., p.233.
11
Ibid., p.235.
12
R. Kirk, The Neoconservatives: An endangered species, Washington, D.C.: Heritage Foundation,
Bradford put it more pungently in his remark during the gloating exultations of America's Gulf War, "I
always feared the domestic Left more than Moscow ... I fear it even more now, since sometimes it calls itself
conservatism. And the danger is perhaps greater now that Communism is out of the way".13
The usurpation of the nationalist conservative tradition by alien internationalist forces that are
basically communist in their mentality has transformed American democracy in this century into a garish
and sterile plutocracy that rules as dictatorially as Stalin did. The current war against "terrorism" has helped
to obscure the fact that the intellectual dictatorship, both blatant and subtle, of the Jewish elite is indeed
generically related to the blatant terrorism and violence that created the Israeli state and sustain it to this day.
As Russell Kirk put it, "What really animates the neoconservatives ... is the preservation of Israel. That lies
at the back of everything".14 The tremendously powerful Jewish lobby, the American-Israeli Political Affairs
Committee, which sponsors, or in other ways controls, many of the successful political candidates in
American elections today, acts as a blatant agent for the foreign state of Israel, so that American foreign
policy-making is more often than not determined in terms of its suitability or unsuitability for the prosperity
of Israel.
The American world-order, though called democratic, is indeed the fulfilment of Karl Marx's
prophecy of a (Jewish) proletarian dictatorship. The real evil of the Marx's revolutionary thought is that it
cunningly substitutes for the natural aristocratic leaders the most successful representatives of the dominant
economic class, regardless of their essentially petty financial background and their weak aptitude for the
national-cultural goals of politics. Whereas modern elitist theorists like Pareto and Mosca stressed the
importance of the character and public spirit of the political leaders, Marx envisioned no leadership other
than the economic elite representing the wealthiest elements of the egoistic proletariat. This is the real bane
of present day American society, which we may rightly call a Marxist one, for the rise to power in it of
formerly outcast social elements, particularly the Jews, represents the most radical undermining of the
traditional aristocratic strength of the West. Of course, the dictatorship of the proletariat that the Jews have
accomplished is not the triumph of the entire populace as anarchist leaders of a nation for such a
phenomenon is indeed a mere chimera or opium for the masses, but rather the rule in the name of the
proletariat of a few wealthy and largely anonymous multinational financial organisations. What remains
effective of a proletarian dictatorship is the unhappy fact that these organisations catering to the masses
succeed in projecting as cultural norms the puerile egoism of the masses. Hence the immense vulgarity of
the tenor of American society in general, which is most markedly influenced by the empty-headed,
computer-generated, television and film entertainments of Hollwood.
A new world-order established on such unnatural and unsound foundations cannot last, even if it
were indeed put into force by economic and military might. And, if Europe is not to decay under the disease
of modern Americanism, an effective remedy must be found to its spread. This remedy, as Rosenberg
pointed out, is a return to the natural socio-political ethos of the Europeans, which is at once nationalistic
and aristocratic. The Europeans should begin to divine too, behind the facade of contemporary power-
politics, the deeper, natural affinities which exist between nations of the same philosophical and cultural
development, so that they will not cast their lot with states such as America and Israel which are essentially
hostile to everything that the ancient cultural heritage of the Indo-Europeans represents. Today, the
intellectual weakness and moral cowardice of the average democratic American have been fittingly duly
rewarded by a total enslavement to alien masters so that they do not even realise that the battles of liberation
that are continuing in the Middle East are indeed daily dramatic confirmations of their own lack of freedom.
If Europe is to be spared this frightful fate of intellectual atrophy it must immediately renounce its allegiance
to the Judeo-American axis and stand forth once again as the continent of higher civilisation and of
enlightened, that is, Indo-European, culture.
It is true that Europe has suffered considerably under the force of the American invasion after the
disastrous world war. As the German scholar, W. Halbfass recently stated in his book, India and Europe: An
Essay in Understanding,15

1988, 3.
13
Quoted in D. Frum, op.cit., 157.
14
Quoted in Mark Gerson, The Neoconservative Vision: from the Cold War to the Culture Wars,
Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1996, p.315.
15
W. Halbfass, India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding, Albany, NY: SUNY, 1988, p.440.
 In a sense, Europe itself has been "superseded" and left behind by the modern Westernized world. It is
certainly no longer the master and protagonist of the process of "Europeanization". The direction of this
process, the meaning of progress, the significance of science and technology have become thoroughly
questionable ... The search for alternatives now appears as a matter of life and death.

However it is not impossible for the Europeans today to recover their original spiritual character and reform
the degenerate type of democratic government which has been forced upon them. If they are to succeed in
arresting the deleterious cultural invasions of a commercial international order which seeks to effect global
unity regardless of the laws of Nature and Spirit, they must strive to counter the Jewish 'frivolitas' with the
'gravitas' that informed the ancient Roman Republic and Empire – the Roman civilisation being forever the
ideal on which the rebirth of Europe must be modelled. Even though Rosenberg criticised the Roman law as
being geared to the protection of the strong and not of the weak, he too recognised that the strength of the
Roman Empire persisted, in diverse ways, in the Germanic Holy Roman Empire and, we may add, in the
empires of Napoleon and the National Socialists. It is significant that the last of these, like the Roman,
sought especially to destroy the Jewish power.
As Rosenberg indicated already in 1925, “when we stand before an either-or – destruction of the
West or securing of Europe in the world - ways must also be found to attain this goal. At the top stands a
demand without whose fulfilment all is in vain – the elimination of the Jews from all the states of Europe.“
Though this demand may seem to prefigure some of the excesses of the anti-Judaism practised during the
Reich, Rosenberg’s own conception of the liberation of the state from the Jewish control, as set out in his
book, Die Spur des Juden im Wandel der Zeiten written in 1920, only envisages the removal of Jews from
German territories to Palestine “or, in general, over the borders“ (Art.8 of the 8 measures that Rosenberg
suggested in this work in order to curb the Jewish ambitions within the German state). Of the other measures
outlined, three or four are valid even today since they recommend that “The Jews do not have the right to
indulge in German politics in word, writing or action“ (2), they do not have the right „to assume state
official positions“ (4) and „do not have the right to be represented in the directorship of the state banks and
communal credit institutions“ (6). Further “Jews do not have the right to be leaders in political and
communal cultural institutions (theatres, galleries, etc.) and to assume professor and instructor positions in
German schools and universities“ (5). Steps such as these were indeed implemented by the National
Socialist regime between 1933 and 1938. Today they have become necessary once again in the task of
reviving Europe from its present moribund state.
What paralyses the West today is the fundamental malaise brought about by the revolutionary social
changes of the post-war years and the loss of all traditional aristocracy and religiosity of political thought.
The materialisation and vulgarisation of the world by the Jewish American elite can therefore be radically
combatted only with a firm aristocratic philosophical foundation. The Indo-European civilisations, both
eastern and western, have been directed in their most glorious periods by a spiritual direction of all worldly
politics. The future of the West must be won by a strenuous re-education of the youth in the classical virtues,
while the family must be strengthened by the elimination of the subversive influences of belligerent - and
licentious - feminism. The regeneration of a nation, as Rosenberg stressed, is dependent on its relationship to
its past: “if a people does not find any more relationship with the great people of the past, this people has not
only lost its history but also is incapable of shaping a future.“ It is necessary to make a determined and
concerted effort to renounce the seductive materialistic way of life prescribed as the capitalist democratic
norm by the alien elite that rule America and, by extension, even Europe, an elite that have, in the course of
the last century, well-nigh destroyed the spiritual and cultural springs of the West.
The national consciousness of the Europeans must therefore be revived in order to strengthen the
body politic if it is to survive the assaults of its powerful internal as well as external enemies. Although this
goal may at first glance seem insuperably difficult in the face of the growing Americanisation and
Judaisation of the world, we may derive definite encouragement in our mission from Rosenberg’s remark
that

The Jew is in every respect far inferior to us. He gluts himself on our generosity as the ivy with
thousand roots sucks into an oak-tree. An energetic operation will be brought about with natural
necessity even in our age. It is important only to look further, to create an impersonal restriction which
prevents the parasite from being able to put forth roots again. Self-confidence, belief in oneself, a
pitiless sense of truth, and courage of convictions: these are the corner-stones of our battle.
Only with such virtues can we achieve what Rosenberg called

the racial internal-political and foreign-political liberation from the immoral profiteering-state;
liberation of our European racial consciousness vis-a-vis the other races of the globe; the victory of an
aristocratic idea over the sordid commercial mentality of the age that passes away at present. That is
the world-battle of today, the world-revolution of tomorrow, the war of which we do not know when it
will be ended, which however must be fought through, if Germany and the entire old Europe should
not decay in the morass as so many peoples of ancient history did.