Self-Evaluation Checklist For Scientific Reports: What To Look Out For YES NO

SELF-EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Since being able to write good research reports is an essential part of your training in Biology, and
these reports account for a significant proportion of your grades, use this checklist to make sure that
your report meets all the requirements listed before you hand in your next report. Tick in the
appropriate columns and note the necessary improvements where needed. Then make the relevant
changes in your reports. You are encouraged to attach this checklist when submitting your report.
WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR YES NO IMPROVEMENTS

NEEDED
Presentation: First impression of my Lab report

1. My title page contains…
a. an accurate and informative title of my research.
b. my personal information e.g. name, student #, course
c. the name of the person I am submitting the report to
spelled correctly
Main Report Sections
2. The Abstract …
a. summarizes the whole experiment in one paragraph.
b. provides concise information on the objective, procedure,
results, discussion and finally the conclusion of the
research.
3. The Introduction …
a. provides a context for the research.
b. synthesizes information from the literature tracing the
development of knowledge of the problem and summarizes
its present state.
c. identifies gaps and inadequacies of current knowledge.
d. states my hypotheses as statements that can be supported

or refuted, and my prediction.
e. briefly presents the approach used in the research.
f. excludes background information not directly related to the

problem.
4. The Materials and Methods section …

a. completely, accurately and precisely presents an exact
process description used in the research in paragraph form
(NOTE: Check if your course requires a different form of
presentation of the methods section)
b. provides enough details of the experimental procedure to

allow someone else to replicate the experiment.
5. The Results section …
a. presents the data I obtained. (NB. Report your data even if
it is contrary to the hypotheses or expectations.)
b. summarizes the data using means, frequency tables,
percentages, or other descriptive statistics.
Figures/tables/graphs are used if they enhance clarity of
presentation of information.
c. makes a reference to the relevant self-explanatory
figures/table/ graphs in the text (e.g. See Figure 3).
d. has captions above tables but below figures/graphs

e. does not contain the same data presented twice in different
figures/tables/graphs.
f. does not interpret the data.
6. The Discussion section …

a. starts with 1-2 sentences summarizing the overall trend of
the findings.
b. states whether the hypothesis is supported/rejected, with
caveats/exceptions where necessary.
c. integrates the literature when explaining why the data
supported or did not support the hypotheses.
d. accounts for errors in a clear and rational way—in terms of
some physical variables
e. analyzes the strengths /limitations of the research.
7. Conclusion section (either separate or part of Discussion section)…

a. provides a conclusion arising from the results and the
discussion.
b. offers suggestions for improvement of the experiment (if
any).
8. References Section…
a. contains accurate documentation of sources used.
b.. follows convention of documentation of the field
consistently.
Writing in Science
I have checked to ensure that I have presented my points
in a logical sequence and used connectors to make it
easy for a reader to follow my points.
I have expressed myself in the most concise and
accurate way I can. There are no ambiguous statements
or pronouns that makes my writing unclear.
Sentence structure…I do not have fragments or run-on
sentences; I use the active voice instead of the passive
voice where possible.
I have run the spell checker through the text to ensure
there are no spelling mistakes.
© Dr. Elaine Khoo, 2005. The Writing Centre, University of Toronto at Scarborough. See terms and conditions for use
at http://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~tlsweb/TWC/webresources/terms.htm

Self-Evaluation Checklist For Scientific Reports: What To Look Out For YES NO

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Self-Evaluation Checklist For Scientific Reports: What To Look Out For YES NO

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Self-Evaluation Checklist For Scientific Reports: What To Look Out For YES NO

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SELF-EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

WHAT TO LOOK OUT FOR YES NO IMPROVEMENTS

Presentation: First impression of my Lab report

Main Report Sections

d. states my hypotheses as statements that can be supported

e. briefly presents the approach used in the research.

f. excludes background information not directly related to the

4. The Materials and Methods section …

b. provides enough details of the experimental procedure to

d. has captions above tables but below figures/graphs

6. The Discussion section …

7. Conclusion section (either separate or part of Discussion section)…

You might also like