Sharpe BMW Case: Presented by

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Sharpe BMW Case

Presented
By
Tyler Houska,
Kris Kennedy &
Toufiq Khan Majlis
Case
Brief
q
Sharp BMW is part of Serra Automotive Group

q
Only Dealership of BMW within the group

q
Service department is primary source of revenue for Sharp
BMW

q
82% absorption rate
ü
Service department was targeted to absorb all overhead,
meaning new car sales are pure profit.

Organization Industry People


Sharpe BMW
Sharpe BMW Automotive Dealership
Service Department
Case
Brief
Organization Structure of Sharpe BMW
Case
Brief
Revenue Structure of Sharpe BMW
Case
Brief
Open Systems Model
Case
Brief
Open Systems Model

Environments The accepted way the industry does it

Customer pay jobs pay more technicians


Inputs
than warranty pay jobs

Transformations Technicians are not motivated by CSI on


(Social Component) customer pay jobs

Compensating technicians better, may


Feedback positively affect CSI score
Case
Brief
Technician Pay Structure
q
Hourly rate stays same ($13/hour)

q
Two types of jobs: Customer Pay or Warranty Pay

ü
Customer Pay = Mitchell Guide to Auto Repair (rate was higher)

ü
Warranty Pay = set by dealership (rate was lower)
Interventio
ns Change Intervention
Intervention 1: Strategic
(Part 6, Page 568) Strategic Alliance

q
Share a service facility with a Buick dealership within the Serra group

Pros Cons
q Financial savings q Management complexity

ü Cost savings on rent/ownership of q Facility organization (separating Buick


facility vs. BMW jobs)

ü Equipment was shared q Organization and management of


finances
q Sharing work force resource
(technicians were shared on non-
specialized jobs)
Interventio
ns Resource Intervention
Intervention 2: Human
(Part 5, Page 422 & 431)
Goal Setting and Reward Systems
q
Goal was set on a group level

q
Goals were not discussed/set for technicians

q
CSI was means to gauging quality of work service department was
performing

q
BMW rewards dealerships to meet CSI scores -
ü
Financially
ü
Sport Activity Vehicle (SAV) (Assume it is a desired vehicle)

q
Target CSI score is 91 points, lowest allowed by Sharpe BMW
Interventio
ns Resource Intervention
Intervention 2: Human
(Part 5, Page 422 & 431)
Goal Setting and Reward Systems
Pros Cons
q Gives employees/management a target q This system does not directly benefit
to achieve those being measured

q Reward systems in general are q Technicians may work slower, focusing


motivators too much on quality

q Reward systems keep employees on q Too much emphasis was placed on CSI
schedule score (should have equal importance as
auto sales and overall revenue)
q Satisfactory CSI rating results in bonus
for technicians (on some jobs)
Interventio
ns Resource Intervention
Intervention 2: Human
(Part 5, Page 422 & 431)
Goal Setting and Reward Systems
Interventio
ns
Inspiration Cases
Case Industry People Change Concept
17.1 Customer All employees at Establishing Chapter 17
The Goal-Setting Relationships Siebel Systems organization’s Performance
Process at Siebel Management that use Goal- objectives based Management
Systems Software Setting Process. on it’s core
values Goal Setting
(Page 422 - 426)

Case Industry People Change Concept


17.3 Catalog The supervisors Improvement of Chapter 17
Revising the Retailer in charge of the Performance
Reward System managing the organizational Management
at Lands’ End performance reward systems
standards and Reward Systems
the employees (Page 431 - 446)
that they are
used for. .
Leadership/Evaluation/Institutionalization

OD & Change
Steps
Management Issues

q Score a CSI for all customers ü Goal Setting


(Ch. 17, pg. 422)
Creating q Change the scoring on the CSI
Vision q Reward employees with bonuses
ü Reward Systems
from accumulated CSI (Ch. 17 Pg. 431)

ü Performance-Based Pay
Systems
(Ch. 17 Pg. 438)
Leadership/Evaluation/Institutionalization

OD & Change
Steps
Management Issues

q Keep Warranty and Non- ü Method for Collecting Data,


Warranty scores separate Questionnaires
(Ch. 7, pg. 125)
Managing q Inform customers of scoring
change ü Goal Setting and Reward
Transition Systems
q Start bonuses low and increase (Ch. 17, pg. 422 & pg. 431)
them as fit (2%)

q Inform all employees on the


change is CSI scoring and
bonus opportunity
Leadership/Evaluation/Institutionalization

OD & Change
Steps
Management Issues

q Retain employees/technicians ü Employee


Involvement (Ch. 9
q Present the adjustments to
Pg. 154)
others in Serra Group

Sustaining q Improve quality of jobs with ü Goal Setting


bonuses (Ch. 17, pg. 422)
Momentum
q More satisfied customers with ü Reward Systems
better quality jobs
(Ch. 17 Pg. 431)
q Increased motivation of workers
with goals and rewards

q Higher CSI ranking nationally


Leadership/Evaluation/Institutionalization

Measure for Success:

ü
Meeting CSI expectations (91)
ü
Satisfied employees/technicians
o
Survey employees on thoughts with new “system”
o
Retain more technicians
ü
All customers (warranty/non-warranty) satisfied/happy with their product
Leadership/Evaluation/Institutionalization

Step by Step:

q
Dunn informs survey company about change
a) Excellent (100), Very Good (90), Good (80), Fair (60), Poor (0)
b) Also add Warranty or Non-warranty Customer

q
Sharpe BMW begins recording all CSI scores

q
End of each month
v)
Pay bonuses to technicians with high accumulated CSI score
ü
Over 91
ü
Bonus begins at 2% for first year

q
At end of each quarter (3 months)
v)
Survey all employees/technicians on feedback with new system

q
After one year
v)
Dunn presents this system to other members of Serra Group

You might also like