CSS Economics Book Part 1 - CSS Economics Syllabus
CSS Economics Book Part 1 - CSS Economics Syllabus
Entireeducation
CSS Economics-I Notes For CSS-2022
Created and Prepared by Entire Education Team
Contact Us: 03084293988, 03314019933
• Incentives and behaviors: How people, as individuals or in firms, react to the situations
with which they are confronted.
• Utility theory: Consumers will choose to purchase and consume a combination of goods
that will maximize their happiness or “utility,” subject to the constraint of how much income
they have available to spend.
• Production theory: This is the study of production—or the process of converting inputs
into outputs. Producers seek to choose the combination of inputs and methods of
combining them that will minimize cost in order to maximize their profits.
• Price theory: Utility and production theory interact to produce the theory of supply and
demand, which determine prices in a competitive market. In a perfectly competitive
market, it concludes that the price demanded by consumers is the same supplied by
producers. That results in economic equilibrium.
• Utility maximization: Individuals are said to make calculated decisions when shopping,
purchasing products that bring them the greatest benefit, otherwise known as maximum
utility in economic terms
• Nonsatiation: People are seldom satisfied with one trip to the shops and always want to
consume more
• Decreasing marginal utility: Consumers lose satisfaction in a product the more they
consume it.
Working through examples and/or cases, consumer theory usually requires the following inputs:
Cardinal theory of consumer behaviour also is helpful to explain the law of demand in the following
ways:
Mathematical Derivation of Consumer Behaviour:
Let U (x) be the utility from commodity X whose price is Px. Let N (x) be the net utility from x and
λ be the marginal utility of money (assumed constant).
Ultimately, the consumer incurs sacrifice of utility. Given the law of DMU, consump-tion of x rises
and, therefore, MUX falls until equality between MUx and λPx holds. Hence once optimality has
been reached, it is always possible for the consumer to find the optimal demand function.
For many economists in the last century, the assumptions on which the theory of cardinal utility
was built were very restrictive. They reformulated the theory of consumer behaviour and named
it ‘The Ordinal Theory of Utility’.
According to the ordinal theory, utility is no longer a measurable concept. What is required is the
existence of a preference base such that an individual can rank the consumption bundles
according to his preference ordering. Let us define two binary evaluations ‘preference to’
(symbolically P) and ‘preference between’ (symbolically I).
This preference ordering is among/ between ‘consumption bundles’, which refers to certain
amount of different commodities. For example: X = {x1, x2,…, xn} is a consumption bundle
consisting of, n commodities x1, x2, ……, xn.
5. Continuity of Preference:
There exist a set of points in the consumption space which divides it into less preferred and more
preferred areas such that these points are indifferent to one another. Once these assumptions or
axioms are valid, it is easier to show consumer preferences in a commodity space as in Fig. 1 (in
a two-dimensional or two-commodity framework).
The remaining two zones, viz., II and IV are important to draw indifference map as follows:
A ray through origin, OH, passes through Zone II. All Space points on OP are inferior to Y but
XPO i.e., somewhere between P and X where there is switch of preferences say point M.
Successive drawings of such a ray through origin can make us safely assert that there is a point
say M which is indifferent to X. Similar exercise can be carried out with Zone IV and joining these
points like W, M, Y, T, we get a curve called Indifference Curve.
An indifference curve is a locus of points in a commodity space—or commodity bundles—among
which the consumer is indifferent. Each point on an indifference curve yields the same utility as
any other point on that indifference curve. The IC approach has been applied in areas of
international trade and public finance, community (social) indifference curves (ICs and SICs) are
used to show gains from trade.
Similarly, ICs are used to compare to the welfare effects of a lumpsum tax and a price distorting
tax. IC approach including the Slutsky theorem is also used to show the effect of income tax on a
worker’s labour-leisure choice. At times SICs are used to compare cost of living indices and then
show the effects of price inflation.
1. IC is Downward Sloping:
In Fig. 2, along the IC, utility is constant. Therefore, when consumption of one commodity
increases, given the level of other commodity, utility increases. But since total utility is constant,
additional utility has to be sacrificed by reducing the consumption of other commodity. Hence IC
is downward sloping.
2. ICs are Non-Intersecting:
In Fig. 3, CPB (since C has more of x1 than B for same x2). But CIA as both C and A lie in same
IC, IC0. Again, BIA, as both B and A lie on same IC1.
... Therefore, by the axiom of transitivity, CIB (or BIC) which is not possible or gives con-tradictory
results. Therefore ICs cannot intersect.
It can be seen that BPA, as more of x2 is consumed in B than A for the same amount of x1. Hence
all the points on IC1 are preferred to all the points on IC0, as it gives higher utility. Again, CPB as
for same x2, more of x1 is consumed. Therefore, all points on IC2 are preferred to all points on
IC0 and IC1 as it gives more utility. Higher IC gives higher utility (Fig. 4).
4. ICs are Convex to the Origin:
Axiom 4 leads to convexity of IC which implies diminishing MRS where by MRS we mean absolute
necessary reduction in consumption of x1 due to additional consumption of x2 by one unit such
that total utility is fixed (assuming two commodities x1 and x2 only)
Now we shall discuss about budget constraint and budget lines. The budget line is set off more
commodity bundles than can be purchased, if the entire money income is spent.
Hence, budget constraint is given by following equation:
m=p1x1 + p2x2
or, x2 = (m/p2 – p1/p2) x1 [This is indeed the equation of a downward sloping straight line.]
Consumers’ initial equilibrium is point E. Every time his income increases the budget line shifts F
and G are the corresponding equilibrium points. The locus of all the equilibrium points is called
income consumption curve. In the Fig. 6 both x1 and x2 are normal goods.
CONTACT US: 03084293988 17 CSS ECONOMICS-I NOTES FOR CSS-
2022
If x1 is inferior the ICC will be backward bending and if x2 is inferior it will be forward falling. See
(Fig 7). If consumption of a good falls as income rises, then such a commodity is called inferior
goods. So one important prediction is that if the consumer spends all his income on two goods,
both cannot be inferior at the same time.
The relation between money income and quantity consumed is explained by a function is known
as the Engel’s curve. Now we allow the price of one of the two goods to fall. Suppose that of x1
falls. In this case the budget line be-comes flatter and the consumer is able to reach higher
in-difference curves and enjoy more utility or satisfaction, thus improving his level of welfare.
So every time P1 falls, the consumer moves to higher IC and reaches a new equilibrium point.
The locus of succes-sive equilibrium points is the price consumption curve (PCC) which shows
the consumer’s reaction to a single price change which changes the price ratio, i.e., p1/p2.
There are two uses of PCC. First, we can derive the consumer’s demand curve for a commodity
from the PCC. According to the ordinal approach, the demand curve for a normal good is
downward sloping due to price effect which has been decomposed by Hicks and Slutsky into two
parts, namely, substitution effect and income ef-fect. The slope of the demand curve depends on
From the PCC we can predict price elasticity of demand (e) by using the total outlay method.
Three points will be noted in the context:
(i) If PCC is downward sloping, demand for x1 is price elastic.
(ii) If PCC is horizontal, demand for x1 is unitary price elastic.
(iii) If PCC is upward sloping, demand for x1 is price inelastic.
We will construct DH and DS for same ini-tial conditions as the one we considered while drawing
the Marshallian demand curve. Let price of x1, p1 fall from p1o to p1’. For Hicksian demand curve
we consider budget line, CD tan-gent to initial IC0 implying constant utility level even as new price
ratio P’1/P2 and hence parallel to AB’. Because of movement from E0 to EH, x1 rises from x1 to
x1H. This is purely substitution effect, and joining E0 and EM we get Hicksian demand curve DH.
This is own-price substitution effect according to Hicks. Under Slutsky interpretation, money
income is so adjusted that individual can purchase initial consumption bundle even at new prices.
Hence dm = x1dp1 + x2dp2 -dm + x1dp1 + x2dp2 = 0
The Homogeneity Property of the Demand Function own-price substitution effect is always
negative. Modem economists like K. Lancaster and L.R. Klein have generalized the homogeneity
property and have emerged with the conclusion that the result holds even in situations when only
representative consumer purchases different goods instead of two. In fact, due to
interrelationships of demand the quantity demanded of each commodity is a function of ‘n’
absolute prices and the money income of the buyer. So the constrained optimisation problem
here is:
In this case, if all absolute prices and the money income get doubled at the same time, the relative
prices and real income will remain constant and there is no reason why the consumer’s purchase
plan will be altered. It is a tribute to the Nobel laureate economist Paul A. Samuelson who
developed the re-vealed preference approach to show that if we eliminate the income effect of a
decrease in p, it is still possible to derive the downward sloping demand curve for x1 from the
actual choice of consumer in the market place.
Revealed preference is a relation that holds between the bundle that is actually demanded at
some budget and bundles that could have been demanded at that budget. For example, when we
say X = X (x1 , x2) is revealed preferred to Y = Y (y1 , y2), we are claiming that X is chosen when
Y could have been chosen, i.e., p1x1 + p2x2 ≥ P1Y1 + P2Y2.
Samuelson retains the two main assumptions of the IC approach, namely, rationality and
consistency and has provided a scientific basis of the theory of the consumer demand in terms of
two axioms of revealed preference, namely, weak axiom of revealed preference weak axiom of
revealed preference (WARP) and strong axiom of revealed prefer-ence (SARP). WARP implies
that, if (x1, x2) is directly preferred to (y1, y2) and the two bundles are not same, then it cannot
happen that (y1 y2) is directly revealed preferred to ( x1, x2).
Let L = (x1 , x2 , p) denote a lottery, i.e., a consumer receives price x1 with probability p and x2
with probability (1 -p). Let M0 denote initial endowment. According to the expected utility theorem,
we have EU (L) =pU (M0 + x1) + (1 -p) U (x2 + M0) where U is a function of money value and is
cardinal. The utility is additive separable in x1 and x2 and is linear in p and (1 -p).
Let the utility function be U = √M and initial endowment be M0 = 36. Let us consider a gambler,
in which individuals coins 13 with probability 2/3 and loses 11 with probability 1/3. We needed to
examine whether the individual participates in gambler or not. For this we must calculate expected
utility from the gambler.
There is a slight problem with computation of percentage changes in this manner. We get different
answers depending on whether we move up or down the demand curve. One way out of this
difficulty is to take the average of two prices and the two quantities over the range we are
considering and comparing the change of the average, instead of comparing it to the price or
quantity at the start of the change.
It has been argued that certain relationships exist between price and quantity demanded and
supplied, other things remaining constant
The vertical demand curve has zero elasticity at every price as given in Fig. 3.4(b):
They rise steadily as the price rises from £1 to £5 per unit; then, when the price rises further to £6
per unit, total revenue remains constant at £30. At prices higher than £6, total revenue actually
falls as price is increased. So it is not safe to assume that a price increase is always the way to
greater revenues.
Here, in Table 3.1, we show the elastic, unit elastic and inelastic sections of the demand schedule
according to whether a reduction in price increases total revenue, causes them to remain
Hence, we have three relationships among the three types of price elasticity and total revenue:
a. Price-Elastic Demand:
A negative relationship exists between small changes in price and changes in total revenue. That
is, if price is lowered, total revenue will rise when the firm faces price-elastic demand. And, if it
raises price, total revenue will fall.
b. Unit Price-Elastic Demand:
Small changes in price do not change total revenue. In other words, when the firm is facing
demand that is unit-elastic, if it increases price, total revenue will not change; if it decreases price,
total revenue will not change either.
c. Price-Inelastic Demand:
A positive relationship between small changes in price and total revenue. That is, when the firm
is facing demand that is price-inelastic, if it raises price, total revenue will go up; if it reduces price,
total revenue will fall. We can see in Fig. 3.5 the areas in the demand curve that are elastic, unit-
elastic and inelastic. For price rise from £1 to £5 per unit, total revenue rises from £10 to £30, as
demand is price-inelastic.
When price changes from £5 to £6, however, total revenue remains constant; at £30, demand is
unit-elastic. Finally, when price rises from £6 to £11, total revenue decreases from £30 to 0.
Clearly, demand is price-elastic. This has been shown distinctly in Fig. 3.5.
In this formula P1 and q1 represent the original price and quantity, and P2 and q2 represent the
new price and quantity.
Thus, (P1 + P2)/2 is a measure of the average price in the range along the demand curve and
(q1 + q2) / 2 is the average quantity in this range.
Fig. 3.7 shows the market of food. Wars have disrupted imports of food. The sc is far to the left of
free market equn price P0 is very high. Instead of allowing free market equn at E, the government
imposes a P ceiling P1. The quantity sold is Q1 and ED is the distance AB. The price ceiling
creates a shortage of supply relative to demand by holding food prices below their equilibrium
level.
The ceiling price P1 allows the poor to afford food, but it reduces total food supplied from Q0 to
Q1 with ED AB at the ceiling price, rationing must be used to decide which potential buyers are
actually supplied. This rationing system could be arbitrary.
Food may go to suppliers’ friends, not necessarily the poor, or may take bribes from the rich who
jump the queue. Holding down the price of food may not help the poor after all. Ceiling prices are
often organised by rationing by quota to ensure that available supply is shared out fairly,
independently of ability to pay.
Whereas the aim of a price ceiling is to reduce the price for consumers, the aim of a floor price is
to raise the price for suppliers. One example of a floor price is a national minimum wage or floor
price for agricultural products.
At the floor price P1 private individuals demand Q1 but supply Q2. In the absence of government
sales or purchases the quantity traded will be Q1, the smaller of Q1 + Q2.
However, the government may agree to purchase the ES AB so that neither private suppliers nor
private demanders need be frustrated. Because European butter prices are set above the free
market equilibrium price as part of the CAP, European governments have been forced to
purchase massive stocks of butter that would otherwise have been unsold at the controlled price.
Hence the famous butter mountain.
Cross-elasticity varies from minus infinity to plus infinity. Complementary goods have negative
cross-elasticities and substitute goods have positive cross-elasticities.
This appears to be identical with the formula for elasticity of demand. However, you will recall that
price elasticity of demand is always negative. But price elasticity of supply is normally positive
since the supply curve slopes upwards from left to right; except in the case of a backward-bending
supply curve, in which case it would have negative elasticity.
Elasticity of Demand and Supply # 15. Price Elasticity of Supply and Length of Time for
Adjustment:
We already know that the longer the time allowed for adjustment, the greater the price elasticity
of demand. The same proposition also applies to supply.
The longer the time for adjustment, the more price-elastic the supply curve becomes:
1. The longer the time allowed for adjustment, the more firms are able to figure out ways to
increase production in an industry.
2. The longer the time allowed, the more resources can flow into an industry through expansion
of existing firms.
We can show a whole set of supply curves similar to the ones we did for demand. In Fig. 3.10,
when nothing can be done in the short-run, the supply curve is vertical SS, when price is Pe and
quantity supplied is Qe.
With a given price increase to P1, there will be no change in the short-run in quantity supplied; it
will remain at Qe. Given same time for adjustment, the supply curve will rotate at price Pe to
S1S1. The new quantity supplied will shift out to Q1 at P1. Finally, the long- run supply curve is
shown by S2S2. The quantity supplied again increases to Q2 at P1 and so on.
The diagram shows the determination of equilibrium price through the interaction of the forces of
demand and supply. E is the point where demand for and supply of the good are equal and OP
price is determined. Now due to some reason or the other, demand for the commodity increases.
That is why the DD demand curve shifts to D1D1. The new demand curve D1D1 intersects the
supply curve SS on point E1. Here the equilibrium price is determined at the level OP1 In
comparative static economics the old and the new equilibrium positions are compared.
In the above figure, we can compare E and E1 points of equilibrium. But it does not show how the
new point of equilibrium i.e. has been reached. In other words, comparative static economics
does not show the path of change. Here we can only compare the two still pictures of the
competitive market.
It may be mentioned that both types of equilibrium analysis are useful, each being valuable in its
own way. Partial equilibrium analysis is useful when the changes in conditions in one market have
little repercussions on other markets.
However, when the changes in conditions in one market have significant effects on other markets,
general equilibrium analysis should be used. Thus, in partial equilibrium analysis when we
consider the determination of market price of a commodity we assume that prices of other goods
do not change.
For example, the rise in price of petrol following imposition of a tax on it would cause little effect
on the prices of goods such as wrist watches, drapers, bowling balls, and in turn there would be
negligible feedback effect of changes in prices of these goods on the demand and price of petrol.
If prices of petrol and of only these commodities are to be considered and since there are little
repercussions of changes in prices of petrol on these other commodities, the use of partial
equilib-rium analysis of price determination of petrol would be quite reasonable.
However, when market for automobiles is considered, the rise in price of petrol would have an
important effect on their demand and price. Therefore, the assumption of partial equilibrium
analysis that prices of automo-biles would remain constant, when the price of petrol changes
would be seriously wrong.
This is because petrol and automobiles being complements to each other, their markets are inter-
related and mutually inter-dependent and changes in their prices would significantly affect each
other. In such cases when there exist inter-relationship and inter-dependence of the markets for
goods (whether they are complements or substitutes), the general equilibrium analysis should be
used. In general equilibrium analysis, all prices are considered variable and the analysis of
simultaneous determi-nation of equilibrium in all markets is made.
In fact when we look at the economic system as a whole, there is a great deal of inter-relation-
ship and inter-dependence among various markets for commodities and factors and there are a
large number of decision making agents—consumers, producers, workers, (who supply labour)
and other resource owners.
All these agents are self-interested and would behave to maximise their goals; consumers would
maximise their utility, and producers would maximise their profits. A comprehen-sive analysis of
the economic system when prices and quantities of all commodities and factors are considered
as variable and which would take into account all inter-relationships and inter-dependence could
be made only through general equilibrium analysis. The general equilibrium would occur when
markets for all commodities and factors and all decision-making agents, consum-ers, producers,
resource owners are simultaneously in equilibrium.
To sum up, partial equilibrium analysis focuses on explaining the determination of price and
quantity in a given product or factor market when one market is viewed as independent of other
markets. On the other hand, general equilibrium analysis deals with explaining simultaneous
equi-librium in all markets when prices and quantities of all products and factors are considered
CONTACT US: 03084293988 54 CSS ECONOMICS-I NOTES FOR CSS-
2022
as variables. Thus, in general equilibrium analysis inter-relationship among markets of all
products and factors are explicitly taken into account.
In what follows we shall explain the conditions of general equilibrium of exchange and produc-tion
in an Economy.
We shall concentrate on the conditions of general equilibrium with regard to the, following three
aspects:-
1. The distribution of goods and services for consumption among individuals in the society;
2. The allocation of productive factors to the production of various goods and services; and
3. The composition of production (or output mix) together with the distribution of consump-tion.
Although the question of existence of general equilibrium is an abstract one, it is very important
because many propositions of economics rest on the existence of general equilibrium.
Producer’s Equilibrium:
Producer’s Equilibrium: MR-MC Approach, Perfect Competition and Diagrams!
Conditions of Producer’s Equilibrium – MR-MC Approach:
Producer’s equilibrium is often explained in terms of marginal revenue (MR) and marginal cost
(MC) of production. Profit is maximized (or a producer strikes his equilibrium) when two conditions
are satisfied – (i) MR = MC, and (ii) MC is rising (or MC is greater than MR beyond the point of
equilibrium output). Let us understand the significance/rationale of these conditions with reference
to Table 1.
In Table 1, MR = MC in two situations – (i) when 2 units of output are produced, and (ii) when 10
units of output are produced. However, while in situation 1 (when output = 2 units) MC is falling,
Implying that the equilibrium will be struck when 10 units of output are produced, not when 2 units
of output are produced. Reason is simple. Given the price, falling MC only increases the difference
between TR and TVC (recall, ΣMC = TVC, and ΣMR = TR). So that TR – TVC tends to rise, or
that profits tend to rise in a situation of falling MC.
Accordingly, it would be an irrational decision for a producer to strike his equilibrium in a situation
of falling MC. It is only when MC is rising that a producer would strike his equilibrium. Thus,
equilibrium will be struck when MR = MC = 12, and MC is rising. The producer will maximize
profits when 10 units of output are produced. Let us illustrate this point further with reference to
Table 1.
Table 1 offers us two different situations when MR = MC, as under: