Two trends are seen in the literature on technology integration's impact on teaching approaches. First, teaching methods are often not transformed or improved with e-learning, and sometimes resist change. Studies found technology is mainly used to disseminate existing materials online, not innovate. Despite investments, there are low levels of online participation and limited learning communities. Within online learning, student participation is key to results, but little is done to actively engage disengaged students, such as with learning analytics and nudging strategies. A research project investigated how these could efficiently involve students. The framework emphasizes managing expectations and commitments for students and teachers. It illustrates approaches that can promote participation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views3 pages
Conceptual Framework and Local Literature
Two trends are seen in the literature on technology integration's impact on teaching approaches. First, teaching methods are often not transformed or improved with e-learning, and sometimes resist change. Studies found technology is mainly used to disseminate existing materials online, not innovate. Despite investments, there are low levels of online participation and limited learning communities. Within online learning, student participation is key to results, but little is done to actively engage disengaged students, such as with learning analytics and nudging strategies. A research project investigated how these could efficiently involve students. The framework emphasizes managing expectations and commitments for students and teachers. It illustrates approaches that can promote participation.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Conceptual Framework
Two trends are noted in the literature on the impact of technology
integration on pedagogical practice. The first is that contrary to expectations, teaching approaches in e-learning contexts are not necessarily being transformed or changed for the better. Instead, there is a persistence of traditional modes of teaching and, in some cases, outright resistance to educational innovation. In a study of VLE use by faculty in a university in Ireland, Blin & Munro (2008) found that the dominant use of the VLE was for the dissemination of course-related materials previously distributed via the Intranet or on paper. cites survey results indicating that for majority of more than 20,000 students and 800 staff surveyed in five large technological universities in Australia, online learning meant the provision of information online and unmoderated discussions. Kirkwood observes that “Despite huge investment in infrastructure by governments and individual institutions, there are disappointing levels of uptake, of engagement, and limited development of ‘learning communities’” in both campus-based blended learning and DE contexts. Within the online learning environment, student participation is co nsistently recognized as a key indicator of learner results. There i s, however, little clarification on the use of proactive methods to pr omote low and nonengaged student engagement: for example, wi th the specific use of course learning analytics (CLA) and nudging strategies in courses to support these students. The authors were informed by a 12month research project, as well as the analytical i nsights offered by communication and critical literacy, to investiga te how CLA and nudging can be used more efficiently to involve st udents. Such insights were used to construct a philosophical cont ext needed by the authors. Built to emphasize concepts of expectation management and commitment for both students and scholars. The article discusses the structure's growth as well as the components and primary communication techniques that it embodies. The system contributes to practice by illustrating and justifying the open, time-efficient, student-focused approaches that can be simply incorporated into the online learning pedagogy of each course to promote the participation of both academics and students.
Local Literature
The results of the research papers included in the study indicate
that some of the many variables appear to dominate More: the participation of educators in online environments, interactions between students, teachers and content, and built content Connections between online and offline activities as well as between activities related to campus and practice. Therefore, the article points in the direction of some important variables, but also addresses and challenges the significance of analysis. Focusing on comparisons between e-learning, online learning, blended learning or "traditional" facet-face teaching and learning in individual formats. Researchers indicates that their learning experience in e - Learning courses is influenced by a number of factors. The factors highlighted by the literature reviewed to be of particular significance for the learning experience of professional education students and their learner identity include the presence of suitable online and off-line teaching and learning spaces and the presence of engaging and meaningful learning communities that support the social interactions of students. Teaching and learning are dynamic and more than just teaching, they are affected by in format. The review is based on systematic searches of the corpus carried out in January 2017 and contains 44 peer- reviewed articles. Published articles and papers between the years 2014 and 2017.