AISC 1971 v02
AISC 1971 v02
MODERN STEEL
CONSTRUCTION
VOLUME XI I NUMBER 2 I SECONO QUARTER 1911
•
Published by
American Institute
of Steel Construction
CONTENTS
101 Park Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10017
Structural Steel Helps Build Newark Airport
Terminal Buildings 3
Steel Serves Well for Tennis Club 8
Wooten's Third Law & Steel Column Design 10
Edwin H. Webster, President Steel Modernizes Pumping Station 13
Gilbert M. Dorland, First Vice President
Van W. Coddington ,
Recording without Red Tape 15
Second Vice President
William R. Jackson, Treasurer
John K. Edmonds, 1971 ARCHITECTURAL AWARDS OF
Executive Vice President
Leslie H. Gillette,
EXCELLENCE COMPETITION
Assistant Executive Vice President
William W. Lanigan,
Tir e American Institute of Steel Construction ha$ announced
Secretary and General Counsel the opening of its twelfth annual A rchitatllral A lcards of Ex-
cellence Program to l'ecognize and ('ncourage creatit" uses of
---.J stmcluml steel. The 1971 Awa"ds will salute outstanding
aesthetic design in structural steel.
• DITORIAL STA~pr All "egistC1'('d architects practicin.'l professionally in the •
United Statl's arc invited to cnler Merl-frall1ed buildill.'ls of
Daniel Farb, Director of Publications
their design conMmcted anywhe,'c ill the 50 states and C01ll-
Mary Anne Donohue, Editor pll'led after January 1, 1970 and prior to Septembe,' I, 1971.
Th e structural frame of the buildin.'l must be stal, althou.'lh
it is 110t a requiremcnt that the stNI bf exposed al1d a part of
... OIONAL.. o ... Ple • • the architectural expression. BlIildillfls of all classifications are
Atlanta, Georgia eli.'lible, with equal emplra,.~is .'Iit'el1 to all sizes alld types in tire
Birmingham, Alabama jud.'lill.'l. There is 110 limit to the 'Illmber of entri(',~ by any ill-
Boston, Massachusetts c/ividual 01' /inn . Buildings named a,~ prcvious AAE winners
Chicago, Illinois will not be eligible.
Cleveland, Ohio
The C01llpctition will be jud,qecl by a panel of /it·e distin-
Columbus, Ohio
guished architects and engilleers. The memblTS of the 1971
Dallas, Texas
Denver, Colorado
National hay of Awards al'e:
DetrOit, MIchigan lo/on P. Eberllard, Al A Dean, School of Architecture and
Charlotte, North Carolina Environmental Design, State University of New York at
Hartford, Connecticut Buffalo, Buffalo, New Y01'k
Houston, Texas
Los Angeles, California lame. H . Finch , FAIA Finch Alexander BanlCs Roth-
Memphis, Tennessee schild & Paschal, Atlanta, Geol'gia
Milwaukee, Wisconsin Dolllen K. Ritchey, FAIA Deetcr Ritchey Sippel Archi-
Minneapolis, Minnesota tects, Pittsburgh, Pcnnsylvania
New York, New York
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Ell",o"l 1. Teal, M.A SCE Albert C. Martin and Associ-
Omaha, Nebraska ates, Los Angeles, Califor'l1ia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania lItox 0, Ur/JO lln , FAIA President-elect A lA ; Max O.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Urbahn A.~sociates, Inc., New YO"k, New York
St. Louis, Missouri
San Francisco, California Entries must be postmarked prior to September 4, 1971 and
Seattle, Washington addressed to the Awards Committee, American Institute of •
Syracuse, New York Steel Construction, 101 Park Avenue, New York, New York
Washington, District of Columbia 10017.
Structural Steel Helps Build
Newark Airport Terminal Buildings
In this age of jet travel, airports must $200-million, is being carried out by
keep pace with the ever·increasing de- the Port of New York Authority to meet
mand for additional facilities to handle this demand.
by Eugene J. Fasullo rapidly expanding passenger volumes This project includes construction of
and and larger aircraft such as the Boeing runways, taxiways, and three terminal
•
Herbert Y. Chu 747. The Redevelopment Program for buildings. Each terminal comprises a
Newark Airport, estimated at more than main building connecting to three cir-
cular satellite buildings. In turn, these
Mr. Fasutlo is Chief Structural En.ineer and nine satellite buildings will accommo·
Mr. Chu Is Senior Structural Engineer with
the Port of New York Authority. date a total of 83 DC·8 type aircraft
. "
,-
•
pre-cambering the 18 in. deep distribu- lightweight concrete floor and roof slabs
tion channel connecting all cantilever Connecti ons are supported by parallel beams on
tips and tilting the canti levers about The framing design for this building chords between radial girders. All the
their moment connections at the girder is rather complex. Beam sizes used vary periphery beams were designed for an
web. Expansion joints in the curved gir- from M6 rolled sections to 5-ft deep assumed reaction from an anticipated
der were introduced at the third points buil t·up girders, and column sizes vary future load ing bridge. The frame action
of the building to match the location of from WlO to the In box sections. Sim- between girders and columns is
other expansion joints. The joint detail ple span beams, continuous span beams achieved by moment connections. Since
has a bronze bearing plate with flat sur- or girders, horizontal trusses, posts sup- the satellite is only 200 ft dia., no ex-
face at the bottom to facilitate sliding ported on cantilever beams, rigid frames, pansion joints were required.
In addition to normal live loads, side· The entire framing system was de· ture. For the type of anticipated traffic,
walks on both arrivals and departures signed on the basis of elastic theory, the following criteria was applied,
floors were designed to support a mov- and non·composite action. However,
ing concentrated wheel load of 12,000 shear studs at nominal spacing were 6. < 0.005 in.
Ibs. This accounts for a possible acci- added to those beams which have long and
dent condition. On the concourse floor, spans and will support permanent win- Lid < 20
•
a moving concentrated load of 2,000 dow walls or masonry walls to create
Ibs distributed over 2\12-ft x 2V2-ft area composite action for minimizing live where 6. = deflection of a beam sub-
was used when stress in the beam ex· load deflection. Camber based on dead jected to a concentrated load of 300
ceeded that produced by the uniform load plus partial live load was specified Ibs at the center of the span; L =
span
live load. Along the sides of the con- on the framing plans for those beams of beam; and d = total depth of beam,
nector floor, a total conveyor loading of which have deflection in excess of V2-in. including the thickness of concrete slab.
200 Ibs per linear It was assumed to be In order to assure pedestrian comfort, This design was conceived and de-
carried by the structural framing. Due all beams under the public assembly veloped by the authors and their staff
to the open-air surroundings in the air- area were checked for undesirable vi- of The Port of New York Authority En-
port, the terminal buildings were de- bration due to uheel impact." The com· gineering Department. The entire proj-
signed to sustain a wind pressure of fort perceptibility is dependent upon ect is under the direction of William P.
20 psf on all exposed vertical surfaces, the rigidity and natural frequency of Starr, Jr., Engineer of Design, and Mar-
and 30 psf on all window assemblies. the floor system which is measured in tin S. Kapp, Chief Engineer. Fabricating
The In structure was designed on the terms of deflection caused by a given and erecting the 12,000 tons of structur-
basis of an assumed vehicle weight. load and ratio of span to depth of struc- al steel cost approximately $4-million.
DEPARTURE
ROADWAY
AIRL.INI[ QP£RA,no""s
PARKING
•
The present program outline of the
club is as follows, Indoors, there are
•
four tennis courts, two squash courts, scaped lawn forming a mall area be- alone was about $3.50 per sq ft, with
a 30 It x 60 It swimming pool, a lounge, tween them and the buildings. the modified extras amounting to be-
lockers, showers, saunas, a snack bar, The building consists of three sepa- tween $.25 and $.50 per sq ft. The third
and the office and pro shop. Outside are rate staggered sections. Two units are section which houses all other indoor
ten tennis courts, a 45 ft x 75 ft swim- modified pre·engineered buildings, each facilities costs about $30 per sq ft; this
ming pool, parking for 100 cars, and a housing two courts. The third section unit includes the swimming pool, squash
landscaped lawn area. The site consists houses all other indoor facilities and is courts, carpeting, and lockers. The aver-
of approximately 16 acres, with the also a metal building, except directly age cost of the total building was $16.80
south properly line along the Massa- over the indoor pool which is laminated per sq ft.
chusetts Turnpike. In order to isolate wood beams on concrete block-bearing All spaces except tennis courts and
the outdoor tennis courts from traffic walls. pool are air-conditioned. Gas-fired pack-
noise, a long narrow building was de- The building area covers a total of aged units heat the tennis courts. The
signed, and was located along the south 44,115 sq ft. The metal building is heating and ventilating equipment is
•
line between the Turnpike and the out- made up entirely of standard "off the housed in a series of simple roof and
door courts. The outdoor pool, another shelf" parts with several modifications wall extensions, utilizing the standard
source of noise, was also located along for aesthetics. The two sections hous- components of the building. These fur-
this line. The outdoor courts are kept ing the four indoor courts cost approxi- ther contribute to the variegated silhou-
to the north side of the site with a land- mately $10 per sq ft, the metal building ette of the building.
•
on com111.on scnse.
V.Jooten 's
Third Law &
Steel Column Design
by Jim Wooten In the early days, designers did not designers probably were pragmatists
Ch ief Structural Design Engineer have the benefit of the uncommon who decided that they would never
AFCD Steel, Li ttle Rock, Ark. knowledge which extensive resea rch has know what the actua l stresses in the
given us, and they had to depend on members were, and they didn't care as
As you may know, Wooten's Third Law common sense. (However, some of the long as the structure did not collapse
states, "The acquisition of uncommon earliest structures were based on ulti- and was not too uneconomical. Those
knowledge inhibits the application of mate strength, which we think of as a fortunate few who are not rich, hand-
common sense." (Wooten's First and "modern" technique.) Because they had some or charming, yet score wel l with
Second Laws are concerned with sex no practical means of dealing with in- the opposite sex, never ask questions-
and, although they are much more in- determinate structures, they made the they just enjoy their success. However,
terest ing, are not germane to this dis- structure determinate by assuming it might profit the rest of us to search
cussion.) The "Absent-Minded Profes- pinned ends and designing beams as for the answer.
•
sor" is an illustration of the Third Law elastic simple spans - thus using an Continuing our history, things rocked
at work, but many other examples come important corollary of the Third Law along well until the early thi rties, when
to mind readily. For instance, the first which we sha ll discuss later. If the Hardy Cross published his papers on
use to which we put the discovery of structure had to support latera l loads moment distribution. This brilliant, com-
nuclear fission was a bomb which had as a frame, t hey again made the frame mon sense idea did much to dispel the
the potential of destroying us. The au- determinate with assumed inflection fear of indeterminate structures and
tomobile is a marvelous application of poin ts and developed on ly the computed helped speed the burgeoning develop-
uncommon knowledge, but its operators frame moment at the beam-colum n con- ment of monolithic concrete design .
have displayed an amazing lack of com- nection, ignori ng the moments caused Steel design did not change much, but
mon sense in its use and abuse. We by vertica l loads on the beams. This simple beams were not very glamorous
have been so lavish with DDT and its apparent inconsistency seemed to work, and the designer felt a little guilty be-
fellow uncommon chlorinated hydro- and, under some conditions, it was not cause he had no elastic moments to
carbons that some say we are now on overly conservative. (For a detai led dis- distribute.
the verge of wiping out all life except cussion, see "Wind Connections with The development of plastic design in
the insect which they were designed to Simple Framing" by Robert O. Disque, the fifties was a common sense ap-
control. Perhaps the best illustration of AISC Engineering Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, proach which explained the true action
the Thi rd Law is the computer, a ma- July 1964.) of continuous beams and single-story
chine which can absorb millions of bits For column design, the Frui t Salad frames under stress and should have
of the most sophisticated uncommon (F.S .) facto r was concocted, wherein the quelled the elastic stress syndrome
knowledge and still remain abysmally proportion of the column strength used which began to infect steel design;
stupid, becoming completely unhinged by t he axia l load at one allowable stress however, its use in columns was de-
if one jot or tittle is misplaced in its (apples) is added to that used by bend- layed fo r so long that common sense
program. Unfortunately, like the com- ing about one axis at a second allow- was inundated by the Computer Age.
puter, we tend to become programmed able stress (oranges) and to tha t used The computer's rapid solution of stu-
rather than educated. by bending about the other axis at a pendous slope deflection equations and
In the design of structural steel, plas- third allowable stress (pears). Mathe- massive stiffness matrices renders ob-
tic analysis has helped us to use com- matically, it is difficult to add apples to solete the necessity of rationa lizing and
mon sense in designing continuous oranges and pears, but the idea appeals simplifying problems - or even of un-
•
beams, but the Third Law creeps in to our common sense as well as to ou r derstanding them. No one need feel
when we attempt to analyze column taste. guilty of using simple solutions when
stresses. A brief historical review (with Many structures were built using the computer can make them extreme ly
carefully selected facts) may help to th ese simple assumptions and many complicated. Anyone can plug a fa lse
demonstrate this. are stil l giving dependable service. The assumption into an incorrect formula
•
heat and the rolling and subsequent for a given allowable strain. The above qualifications are not un-
cooling of the particular shape intro- Before proceeding further, it is nec- duly restrictive since the overwhelming
duce certain residual stresses. Any fab- essary to add the following qualifica- majority of steel buildings are designed
rication process - cutting, coping, tions to the above statements: in line with these provisions for the
punching, cambering, or welding - im- 1. The material is assumed to be sake of integrity or economy.
pose further residual stresses and if structural grade carbon steel which has The simple beam moment diagram
the member does not fit perfectly in the the necessary ductility to conform to for vertical loads and the portal frame
field, only God knows what happens to almost any stupid assumption. analysis for lateral loads are simple
the poor thing before it is finally laid 2. The loads are assumed to be the computations that identify the total
to rest. Since we don't even know what customary static loads found in build- moments which the structure must sup-
state of stress the member is in before ings with the possibility of few load port. Knowing these, the designer may
any loads are applied, it is hardly logi- reversals. make any "rational" assumption he
cal to think that we know more about it
after we apply certain assumed loads
which are probably 50 percent to 100
percent wrong. This is why it is irra-
tional to base allowable stresses on a Th e computtr render.
certain yield stress at which the mem- obsolete the llccc ..itJl of
ra.tiotlalizhll1 a.rui ,impli/JlilIV
ber is assumed to fail. We must "fail" problem. - or even 0/
the steel elastically to cut it. punch it, tUlder.tatldi"Q thrm .
or perform any act of fabrication on it.
A bent plate connection has been
"failed" before any load is applied. Yet
plastic design research has shown that 1/
I
these residual stresses and elastic "fail-
ures" in the member do not interfere
with the attainment of its theoretical I
ultimate strength.
I
•
Thus we must confess that, with all
our uncommon knowledge, we cannot
compute the actual stress at any point
in member. Having conceded that, we
can see it never was important anyway.
•
wishes as to the distribution of these sign deep trusses in industrial build- or after loading. We can forget moments
moments and the material will conform ings as simple spans with pinned ends, induced in columns by checkerboard
to this assumption. Considering vertical then connect the ends to the columns loading, because continuous beams, de-
loads only, he may assume pinned ends to develop the portal frame moments signed for maximum loads, will develop
and design the beam for maximum mo- from lateral loads, ignoring the gravity the unbalanced moments from reduced
ment at midspan and the column for moments induced in the columns. We loading without help from the columns.
axial loads only if the structure is braced connect a deep girder to the web of a Depending on the relative lengths of
laterally. Or he may assign any portion long slender column by means of a long each, we can use the moment capacity
of the total moment to end fixity, re- bolted connection to develop "shear" of a column to assist the beams or ig-
ducing the moment at midspan cor- only and have no qualms about design- nore the elastic moment i f it is of no
respondingly, provided that the end ing the columns for axial load only, yet economic advantage. Summarily,
connection and either the adjoining the connection will develop the full 1. The acquisition of uncommon
beam, if present, or the column, or both elastic moment of the column and pro- knowledge inhibits the application of
acting together, be strong enough to duce an F. S. factor of 1.5 to 2.0. Should common sense (Wooten's Third Law).
develop this moment. This can be car- a beam, intended to have a "shear" 2. Structural Steel, having no un-
ried to absurdity by assigning the total connection only welded to its web, by common knowledge, is smarter than the
moment to the ends and placing a pin mistake have its flanges welded to the engineer who designs it (Wooten's Cor-
at midspan, and the structure will be columns, it is highly unlikely that the ollary).
stable although probably not economi- designer would insist on the flanges 3. Elastic slress in a braced steel
cal. The same procedure can be used being cut loose. member is usually meaningless, which
to analyze moments due to lateral loads. None of these examples conform to is fortunate because it is impossible to
It should be remembered that the strain the design assumptions, yet they are compute. If the consequent slrain of a
of the members will vary as the ma- successful because a plastic hinge de- structure is acceptable, the only stress
terial conforms to the various assump· velops in the beam, the connection, or criterion is that the lolal structure be
tions made. the column, and the connection be- proportioned to support the lolal simple
There should be nothing very upset- haves as a pin from that point onward moments induced by the loading. Con-
ting about Wooten's Corollary, since we without stressing the member. sequently, "semi-rigid" connections and
use it every day without admitting it. We ignore the moment at the con- "checkerboard" stresses are wasteful
Our standard bolted shear connections, nection when the girder is much stiffer placebos for the theoretician, and do
which are assumed to act as pins, must than the column because so little elas- not contribute to the physical health of
yield and deform considerably before tic moment can be developed by the the structure.
rotating or distributing the load equally slender column (of course, it can't re- 4. Wooten's First and Second Laws
to all bolts as we also assume. We de- sist much either), however, when the are more interesting.
Structural Solution
.----.....----
.. ,..::.
::
Structural steel rigid framing, 60·ft
long x 30-ft high, spaced at 18 ft cen- ~
- -
--::--~
--
• -. -
..
.
,
..
-
. l~ ·
·-
- .
1 .
••
the architectural design. The columns -: .... _ . :,- -, .: . ~' P, 't' .
were utilized to support the crane run-
way which, in turn, provided stiffness to
the columns. 1IIIIil.I~:: ~!,e" III Iii : 1
•
Welded connections were predomi-
nantly adapted to provide a clean finish.
Conventional cross bracing was pro-
vided in the plane of the roof to resist
wind loads and crane loads.
•
reflecting plastic film was applied to
the skylight at the main entry .