Marketing Decision Making: Gyaan Kosh Term 4
Marketing Decision Making: Gyaan Kosh Term 4
CONTENTS
1. Go-To-Market Strategies
2. Marketing Research
a. MDS and Semantic Analysis (Perceptual Maps)
b. Conjoint Analysis
4. Resource Allocation
Participants: Sales Force Options: Direct Sales Force Agents / Distributors / Retailers/Value-
Added Partners.
Non Sales Force: Advertising &/Promotion/Direct Mail/Tele-channels/Internet.
Marketing Research
Two Key Questions: What attributes does the consumer use in comparing competing
products& how do these characteristics relate to the technical features [Perceptions]. What
is the relative weight assigned to each attribute when deciding which product to buy
[Preference]
2. Product
1. Perceptions of a new product concept in the context of existing brands in the market
2. Find the “gap” in the market to position the product Semantic Analysis
REMEMBER: Semantic Scaling always asks questions about the perceived products along
a number of dimensions.
Gyaan Kosh Term 2 MKDM
MDS Analysis:
REMEMBER: MDS always asks questions about SIMILARITIES and DISSIMILARITIES
between TWO Products on various attributes
Gyaan Kosh Term 2 MKDM
Conjoint Analysis
Steps in Conjoint:
a. Attribute list formation
b. Data collection
c. Utility Calculation
d. Market Simulation
Conjoint (trade-off) analysis has become one of the most widely-used quantitative methods
in Marketing Research. It is used to measure the perceived values of specific product
features, to learn how demand for a particular product or service is related to price, and to
forecast what the likely acceptance of a product would be if brought to market.
In contrast to simpler survey important of each attribute, situations. research methods that
directly ask respondents what they prefer or the survey important of each these
preferences are derived from these relatively realistic tradeoff attribute, situations.
Each profile includes multiple conjoined product features (hence, conjoint analysis), such as:
The result is usually a full set of preference scores (often called part-worth utilities)
for each attribute level included in the study. (This is obtained by running a
regression)
2. Applying the choice Model (converting utility scores for product alternatives to probabilities
of choice):
Pros:
1. Results are easy to interpret& key attributes are easily established. 2. Attributes
can be categorical as well as intervally scaled.
Cons: 1. Relevant attributes& key levels must be known in advance 2. Approach gets messy
with many attributes& levels 3. Market share estimates obtained differ from actual shares.
Some Real-World Applications of Conjoint:
Gyaan Kosh Term 2 MKDM
2. Customer Segmentation.
1. Financial approaches:
a) Percentage of sales b) Affordability
3. Sales response:
Adbudg:
Implementation:
What do you expect the sales level (relative to current levels) to be in response to
– no sales force
– 50% of current sales force
– 100% of current sales force
– 150% of current sales force
– saturation level sales force
Answering these questions is usually done by forcing a consensus estimate from a team of
managers– all members of the team first answer the questions privately– results are
revealed& discussed– adjustments are made& discussed until a single set of answers to
the 5 questions remains.
Resource Allocation
Assumptions:
• All managers of various divisions share the same corporate goal
• All managers agree that opportunities vary at any point in time and over time
• There is sufficient information about ajor competitors and market structure
Gyaan Kosh Term 2 MKDM
Strengths
– easy to use
– diverse applications
• Resource allocation• Effect of mergers on strategy
Weaknesses
- Questions about share profitability link
– Assumptions about finite cash flow
– Subject to Moral Hazard
– Often misapplied as they appear to be “easy to use”
– Assumes independence across SBUs.
GE Mckinsey Matrix:
Steps:
3. We get the Maximum WTP by multiplying Exchange Rate in Column 1 with the sum in
Column 8.