New Classical Economics
New Classical Economics
New Classical Economics, is a school of thought in macroeconomics that builds its analysis entirely on a
neoclassical framework. Specifically, it emphasizes the importance of rigorous foundations based on
microeconomics, especially rational expectations.
The New Classical school emerged in the 1970s as a response to the failure of Keynesian economics to
explain stagflation.
New classical economics is based on Walrasian assumptions. All agents are assumed to maximize utility
on the basis of rational expectations. At any one time, the economy is assumed to have a unique
equilibrium at full employment or potential output achieved through price and wage adjustment.
New Classical and monetarist criticisms led by Robert Lucas, Jr. and Milton Friedman respectively forced
the rethinking of Keynesian economics. In particular, Lucas made the Lucas critique that cast doubt on
the Keynesian model. This strengthened the case for macro models to be based on microeconomics.
After the 1970s and the apparent failure of Keynesian economics, the New Classical school for a while
became the dominant school in Macroeconomics.
The new classical perspective takes root in three diagnostic sources of fluctuations in growth: the
productivity wedge, the capital wedge, and the labor wedge.
New classical economics is based on Walrasian assumptions. All agents are assumed to maximize utility
on the basis of rational expectations. At any one time, the economy is assumed to have a unique
equilibrium at full employment or potential output achieved through price and wage adjustment. In
other words, the market clears at all times.
New classical economics has also pioneered the use of representative agent models. Such models have
received severe neoclassical criticism, pointing to the disjuncture between microeconomic behavior and
macroeconomic results, as indicated by Alan Kirman.