Great Britain in The Twentieth Century - TOPIC 2 - 3 (Without The Paris Peace Conference)
Great Britain in The Twentieth Century - TOPIC 2 - 3 (Without The Paris Peace Conference)
Great Britain in The Twentieth Century - TOPIC 2 - 3 (Without The Paris Peace Conference)
For the military history of the war: see T. Heyck, 109–117. (course reader)
United political powers – except for pacifists (NO ELECTIONS UNTIL PEACE)
Frustration:
Zeppelin bombings: Dec 1914; April 1915: London
long war, no real successes (for either side); feeling of hopelessness
many victims: 1500 casualties / day for 4,5 years
no family left untouched (1 million dead, 1,5 million wounded or permanently
maimed)
increasing paranoia and anti-German sentiment (e.g. physical insults on
English citizens with German names)
Political consequences:
Asquith (1908-1916): moderate Liberal; mediator rather than a leader, not very
decisive
War Council: Sir Herbert Kitchener (Secretary of War), Winston Churchill (First Lord
of Admiralty), D. Lloyd George (Min. of Ammunitions), Lord Curzon (Leader of the
House of Lords); H. H. Asquith PM; CONCENTRATION OF POWER: highly reflexive
political system
Asquith: to solidify his power, in May 1915 he created a great coalition (CON Bonar
Law, LAB, Arthur Henderson) – Ministry of Ammunitions: David Lloyd George (earlier
Chancellor of Exchequer) – privatized company with huge profits, enormous business
(240 000 machine guns produced by Nov 1918); removal of Churchill after Gallipoli
(April, 1915)
1
GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY (BA HISTORY SURVEY)
Institute of English and American Studies, Department of English
Zoltán Cora HANDOUTS
TOPIC 2: The Great War and Britain (1914–1918)
TOPIC 3: The repercussions of the First World War on Britain
Problems:
1)
Irish rebellion: 1916 – England’s misfortune is Ireland’s opportunity: Irish Republican
Brotherhood to contact Berlin – military and financial help to start a war against the
English
Easter Rebellion in Dublin: very badly organised, no real support arrived in time –
Irish Declaration of Independence (REPUBLIC). April 1916: crushed in 4 days –
leaders executed except a few, including Eamon De Valera because he had
American citizenship as well.
2)
Somme offensive: very unfortunate – attacks on Asquith (Bonar Law, LG: Min. of
Defence since June 1916, after solidifying his influence in ammunition business)
LG wanted Asquith to pass power to a more narrow war committee led by LG, mostly
supported by conservatives – but: neither Curzon, nor Austen Chamberlain acceded
to it, both LG and Asquith resigned. Asquith hoped that the king, George V, would
assign him as PM, but the king chose the more persuasive LG (Dec 7, 1916) –
Asquith resigned from politics (his son, Raymond, also died in the war).
War Cabinet by LG (1916-1918): (Balfour: For. Sec.; B. Law: Ch. of Exch.; Curzon,
Milner, Henderson, LG): strong conservative support for a strengthened war effort.
Split of the Liberal Party: Asquithian Liberals regarded this alliance with the
conservative as a treason and left DLG (100 Liberal MPs split), but it created a space
and opportunity for the Labour on the long run.
DLG (PM 1916-1922): the “Welsh Wizard”: dynamism, able politician, pragmatist; an
excellent tactician; businessman
A. J. P. Taylor: DLG was the British Napoleon, with all of Napoleon’s merits and
frailties.
2
GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY (BA HISTORY SURVEY)
Institute of English and American Studies, Department of English
Zoltán Cora HANDOUTS
TOPIC 2: The Great War and Britain (1914–1918)
TOPIC 3: The repercussions of the First World War on Britain
DLG: highest concentration in his hands!!! No real friends, only temporary allies, no
solid party affiliation; but: gaining huge wealth during PM-ship; a real chameleon;
(korabeli Gyurcsány).
Lord Beaverbrook on DLG: “He did not seem to care which way he travelled
providing he was in the driver’s seat”
Spring 1917: Imperial War Cabinet – include the representatives of the dominions
(General Smuts from South Africa !)
“garden city” PM: DLG as the key figure – had his meetings in the garden of Downing
Street 10.
Sept 1917: Henderson out of the cabinet due to the internationalist turn in
internationalist communist movement
May 1918: final liberal split: Frederick-case: Sir Frederick Maurice, the head of the
military intelligence, accused LG that he willingly refused Douglas Haig to use the
reserve forces during the Flandrian offensive. Asquithian Liberals also moved to
attack LG. Though LG retained help from Haig, he cunningly replied that he did so on
the council of Maurice’s data and information...
Economic consequences:
rise in taxes (MacKenna, new Chancellor of Exchequer) – income tax by 30%,
33% on luxury products, 50% extra tax on business profit
protective tariffs: off the gold standard temporarily
nationalisations: railways, shipping (esp. trade shipping), mining
regulation of prices; “national thrift”
3
GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY (BA HISTORY SURVEY)
Institute of English and American Studies, Department of English
Zoltán Cora HANDOUTS
TOPIC 2: The Great War and Britain (1914–1918)
TOPIC 3: The repercussions of the First World War on Britain
Social consequences:
Compulsory conscription: compulsory conscription from Jan 1916: 18-41 ages
unmarried (from May: married as well), except for those who were working in
“protected jobs” (mines, arsenals, etc.)
4
GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY (BA HISTORY SURVEY)
Institute of English and American Studies, Department of English
Zoltán Cora HANDOUTS
TOPIC 2: The Great War and Britain (1914–1918)
TOPIC 3: The repercussions of the First World War on Britain
5
GREAT BRITAIN IN THE 20TH CENTURY (BA HISTORY SURVEY)
Institute of English and American Studies, Department of English
Zoltán Cora HANDOUTS
TOPIC 2: The Great War and Britain (1914–1918)
TOPIC 3: The repercussions of the First World War on Britain
A.J.P. Taylor (Perry, 689–690.): lays stress on the negative effects of the war: doubt,
irrationality, disintegration, demoralization and disappointment – generations and civil
populace manipulated by war and propaganda
“The First World War was difficult to fit into the picture of a rational civilisation
advancing by ordered stages. The civilised men of the twentieth century had outdone
in savagery the barbarians of all the preceding ages, and their civilized virtues –
organisation, mechanical skill, self-sacrifice – had made war’s savagery all the more
terrible. Modern man had developed powers which were not fit to use. European
civilisation had been weighed in the balance and found wanting.”