Case Title: Topic: Doctrine
Case Title: Topic: Doctrine
Case Title: Topic: Doctrine
12, 2012
DOCTRINE: The law is clear that the attestation must state the
number of pages used upon which the will is written. The purpose
of the law is to safeguard against possible interpolation or omission
of one or some of its pages and prevent any increase or decrease in
the pages.
FACTS:
Richard filed a petition for the probate of his father's Last Will
and Testament before the RTC of Manila with prayer for the
issuance of letters testamentary in his favor. Marybeth opposed the
petition contending that the purported last will and testament was
not executed and attested as required by law, and that it was
procured by undue and improper pressure and influence on the part
of Richard. The said opposition was also adopted by Victoria.
However, the RTC disallowed the probate of the will for failure
to comply with Article 805 of the Civil Code which requires a
statement in the attestation clause of the number of pages used
upon which the will is written. It held that while Article 809 of the
same Code requires mere substantial compliance of the form laid
down in Article 805 thereof, the rule only applies if the number of
pages is reflected somewhere else in the will with no extrinsic
evidence required. While the acknowledgment portion stated that
the will consists of 7 pages including the page on which the
ratification and acknowledgment are written, the RTC observed that
it has 8 pages including the acknowledgment portion. As such, it
disallowed the will for not having been executed and attested in
accordance with law.
RULING:
The law is clear that the attestation must state the number of
pages used upon which the will is written. The purpose of the law is
to safeguard against possible interpolation or omission of one or
some of its pages and prevent any increase or decrease in the
pages.