Scribd
Upload
25 views9 pages

Sasassa

Uploaded by

Joli Smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views9 pages

Sasassa

Uploaded by

Joli Smith
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Another easier way to compute productivity change, since the unit produces basis is the same, is to simply compare

the Input
Productivity is inversly proportional to Used Input hence the percentage change is [(Old Used Input / New used input)-1]

For Labor (hours): 300/275 - 1 = 0.0909


For Resin (pounds): 50/45 - 1 = 0.1111
For Capital Invested ($): 10000/11000 - 1 = -0.0909
For Energy (BTU): 3000/2850 - 1 = 0.0526
Percentage
Old Productivity New Productivity
Change
Units Produced per Units Produced per -
Used Input Used Input

3.33 3.64 9.09%

20 22.22 11.11%

0.1 0.09 -9.09%

0.33 0.35 5.26%

s to simply compare the Input value.


put / New used input)-1]
Since Problem 2 has been solved, its worth noting that the way to find the outsdanding score is the sumproduct of the weight
Example for HI-TECh (Canada)
0.5*3 + 0.2*4 + 0.3*5 = 3.8

The same can be done with the other companies.


the sumproduct of the weights array with the rating array.
It is worth noting that Provider D is strictly worse than Provider A for all values of w since the slope is the same and it has lowe
The 2 score curves are parallel with yD lower than yA.

yA and yC intersect point: yA = yC ==> 5w + 320 = 3w + 370 ==> 2w = 50 ==> w=25


For w < 25, yA < yC.
for w > 25, yA> yC.

yB and yC intersect point: yB = yC ==> 4w + 330 = 3w + 370 ==> w = 40


for w < 40, yB < yC.
for w > 40, yB > yC.
Since w range is 1 through 30, hence yB < yC for all possible w.

The final solution for chosing Provider C is 1 < w < 25.

On the right, I will verify this solution graphically.


Score of Provider A: 500
yA = 5w + 320
Score of Provider B:
yB = 4w + 330 450
Score of Provider C:
yC = 3w + 370
Score of Provider D: 400
yD = 5w + 225

Provider Score
350

300

250

200
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1
pe is the same and it has lower intersect with the y axis. w
w yA
1 325
2 330
3 335
25; 445 4 340
25; 445 5 345
6 350
7 355
8 360
9 365
yA 10 370
yB 11 375
yC 12 380
yD
13 385
14 390
15 395
16 400
17 405
18 410
19 415
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 20 420
w
21 425
22 430
23 435
24 440
25 445
26 450
27 455
28 460
29 465
30 470
yB yC yD
334 373 230
338 376 235
342 379 240
346 382 245
350 385 250
354 388 255
358 391 260
362 394 265
366 397 270
370 400 275
374 403 280
378 406 285
382 409 290
386 412 295
390 415 300
394 418 305
398 421 310
402 424 315
406 427 320
410 430 325
414 433 330
418 436 335
422 439 340
426 442 345
430 445 350
434 448 355
438 451 360
442 454 365
446 457 370
450 460 375

You might also like