Grocery Customer Behavior Analysis Using RFID-based Shopping Paths Data
Grocery Customer Behavior Analysis Using RFID-based Shopping Paths Data
standard clustering methods are not feasible because moving data such environment. A more effective store environment can provide
as the shopping path should be adjusted in advance of the analysis, convenient services for customers and hence increases sales. Up
which is time-consuming and causes data distortion. To alleviate this to now, however, store managers have relied on experiences of
problem, we propose a new approach to spatial pattern clustering
the high-sales locations and those where customers tend to stay
based on the longest common subsequence. Experimental results using
real data obtained from a grocery confirm the good performance of the for a long time. Based on their experience, they decided where
proposed method in finding the hot spot, dead spot and major path to display products and how to change in-store layout.
patterns of customer movements. Farley and Ring [3] recorded the movement of some
customers by following them in order to analyze the shopping
Keywords—customer path, shopping behavior, exploratory path, one of the shopping behaviors, of customers. However,
analysis, LCS, RFID due to the numerous customers that visit the stores daily, it is
difficult to record individual consumption behavior with only a
I. INTRODUCTION few researchers and limited budget. The record is also not
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(11) 2011 1508 scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/13460
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering
Vol:5, No:11, 2011
Therefore, in this paper we propose a new method of spatial clustering method is inadequate for in-store shopping path
patterns clustering in order to solve the problems of previous pattern grouping.
studies by changing the real shopping path to path location
sequences and by using a new similarity measure between
different customers’ shopping paths. By adopting the longest
common subsequence (LCS) method as the basic idea and
expanding on it, we developed the main shopping path
identification technique that is capable of identifying the
hotspots where most of the customers’ visits are made and the
dead spots with few visits. We finally applied our newly
developed method to the real data of a large supermarket store
located in Seoul and analyzed its customer flow information.
Fig. 1 Euclidean distance and actual customer path in a store
II. RELATED LITERATURE
Since each customer has a different travel distance for
International Science Index, Economics and Management Engineering Vol:5, No:11, 2011 waset.org/Publication/13460
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(11) 2011 1509 scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/13460
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering
Vol:5, No:11, 2011
pattern.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(11) 2011 1510 scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/13460
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering
Vol:5, No:11, 2011
sequence but also identify the Hot spot and Dead spot areas. The
traditional Hot spot and Dead spot identification method uses close to the entrance, and that the areas within 5 meters of the
statistical analysis to sum up and compare all the locations entrance were the first Hot Spot. Furthermore, the area before
where the shopper visited. One of the main advantages of the moving to the casher’s counter after the shopping had been
suggested algorithm is its ability to simultaneously identify both completed had the most overlapping patterns and was
spots and the main shopping paths. As the LCS is characterized determined to be the second Hot Spot. Although few purchases
by grouping the main shopping path sequences in travel order, were made in this area, it is likely to be a highly effective area
the most repeatedly appearing nodes among all sequence groups for demonstration and should be used to display promotional
are regarded as a Hot spot, and the most rarely visited area as a products and hot products in order to generate more purchases.
Dead spot. The triangle area is a bridge area that connects the first Hot Spot
and the second Hot Spot, and most seasoning products and
IV. EXPERIMENTAL TEST AND RESULTS kitchen product purchases were made in this area. However, few
purchases were made in the area to the left side of the triangle,
To apply the proposed algorithm, we conducted a test and
even though the customers’ shopping paths included this area.
analyzed data for an actual large discount store located in Seoul,
These results indicated that the store manager needs to change
Korea. The store is a single floor building with an average of
product display and promote sales through product analysis.
554 customers daily.
More than 200 RFID Tags were installed on shopping carts
and 200 readers on shelves to collect the customers’ shopping
traces. The data were collected for a week in February 2011 and
filtered shopping paths were obtained for Monday, Wednesday
and Friday.
V. CONCLUSION
Existing customer analysis in retail stores has relied on basket
analysis or sales statistics, and has rarely included analysis for
service efficiency or customer behavior pattern. However, our
Fig. 9 Region of installed RFID devices and main products study provides a method to identify customers’ shopping paths
or major sales areas by collecting and analyzing information on
customers’ main travel path, which was not provided in the
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(11) 2011 1511 scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/13460
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering
Vol:5, No:11, 2011
existing customer analysis techniques. Existing customer [8] Hoyer, W. D. (1984), An Examination of Consumer Decision Making for
a Common Repeat Purchase Product, Journal of Consumer Research,
analysis methods using Euclidean distance suffered tumbling 11(3), 822-829.
issues with distant spots and data processing based on the [9] Hui, S. K., Bradlow, E. T. and Fader, P. S. (2009), Testing Behavioral
measurement. We have expanded the LCS technique and Hypotheses Using an Integrated Model of Grocery Store Shopping path
developed a new method to identify the customers’ main and purchase Behavior, Journal of consumer research, 36, 478-493.
[10] Hui, S. K., Fader, P. S. and Bradlow, E. T. (2009), Path Data in
pattern. This new method provides information necessary to Marketing: An Integrative Framework and Prospectus for Model
decide about customers’ shopping sequence and to determine Building, Marketing Science, 28(2), 320-335.
meaningful spots in stores. [11] Larson J. S., Bradlow E. T. and Fader P. S. (2005), An exploratory look at
supermarket shopping paths, International Journal of Research in
Based on this analysis, the results will increase understanding Marketing, 22(4), 395– 414.
of the customers’ consumption behavior and will assist in [12] McClure, P. J. and West, E. J. (1969), Sales Effects of a New Counter
deciding whether product display and layout need to be Display, Journal of Advertising Research, 9, 29-34.
[13] Newman, A. J., Yu, D. K. C. and Oulton , D. P. (2002), New insights into
changed. The proposed more quantitative method improves retail space and format planning from customer-tracking data, Journal of
existing qualitative analysis which mainly relied on store Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(5), 253-258.
employees’ daily experience and provides objective numbers in [14] Uotila, V. and Skogster, P. (2007), Space management in a DIY store
analyzing consumer shopping paths with data-tracking devices,
order to provide high-quality services to customers and increase
International Science Index, Economics and Management Engineering Vol:5, No:11, 2011 waset.org/Publication/13460
REFERENCES
[1] Cox, K. (1964), The Responsiveness of Food Sales to Shelf Space
Changes in Supermarkets, Journal of Marketing Research, 1(2), 63-67.
[2] Dickson, P. R. and Sawyer, A. G. (1986), Point-of-Purchase Behavior and
Price Perceptions of Supermarket Shoppers, Working Paper No. 86-102,
Marketing Science Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA
02138.
[3] Farley, J. U. and Ring, L. W. (1996), A Stochastic Model of Supermarket
Traffic Flow, OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 14(4), 555-567.
[4] Gil J., Tobari E., Lemlij M., Rose A., Penn A. (2009), The Differentiating
Behaviour of Shoppers: Clustering of Individual Movement Traces in a
Supermarket, Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax
Symposium.
[5] Harris, D. H. (1958), The effect of display width in merchandising soap,
Journal of Applied Psychology, 42(4), 283-284.
[6] Hirschberg, D. S. (1977), Algorithms for the longest common
subsequence problem, Journal of ACM, 24(4), 664-675.
[7] Hou, J-L. and Chen, T-G. (2011), An RFID-based Shopping Service
System for retailers, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25(1), 103-115.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 5(11) 2011 1512 scholar.waset.org/1307-6892/13460