Statistics-Exercise 3
Statistics-Exercise 3
10-39. Fifteen adult males between the ages of 35 and 50 participated in a study
to evaluate the effect of diet and exercise on blood cholesterol levels.
The total cholesterol was measured in each subject initially and then three
months after participating in an aerobic exercise program and switching to a
low-fat diet. The data are shown in the accompanying table. Do the data support
the claim that low-fat diet and aerobic exercise are of value in producing a mean
reduction in blood cholesterol levels? Use __0.05.
Blood Cholesterol Level
Subject Before After
1 265 229
2 240 231
3 258 227
4 295 240
5 251 238
6 245 241
7 287 234
8 314 256
9 260 247
10 279 239
11 283 246
12 240 218
13 238 219
14 225 226
15 247 233
10-40. An article in the Journal of Aircraft (Vol. 23, 1986, pp. 859–864)
describes a new equivalent plate analysis method formulation that is capable of
modeling aircraft structures such as cranked wing boxes and that produces
results similar to the more computationally intensive finite element analysis
method. Natural vibration frequencies for the cranked wing box structure are
calculated using both methods, and results for the first seven natural frequencies
follow:
Finite Equivalent
Element Plate,
Freq. Cycle/s Cycle/s
1 14.58 14.76
2 48.52 49.10
3 97.22 99.99
4 113.99 117.53
5 174.73 181.22
6 212.72 220.14
7 277.38 294.80
(a) Do the data suggest that the two methods prove the same mean value for
natural vibration frequency? Use __0.05.
(b) Find a 95% confidence interval on the mean difference between the two
methods.
Mercedes Volkswagen
24.7 24.9 41.7 42.8
24.8 24.6 42.3 42.4
24.9 23.9 41.6 39.9
24.7 24.9 39.5 40.8
24.5 24.8 41.9 29.6
(a) Construct a normal probability plot of each of the data sets. Based on these
plots, is it reasonable to assume that they are each drawn from a normal
population?
(b) Suppose that it was determined that the lowest observation of the Mercedes
data was erroneously recorded and should be 24.6. Furthermore, the lowest
observation of the Volkswagen data was also mistaken and should be 39.6.
Again construct normal probability plots of each of the data sets with the
corrected values. Based on these new plots, is it reasonable to assume that they
are each drawn from a normal population?
(c) Compare your answers from parts (a) and (b) and comment on the effect
of these mistaken observations on the normality assumption.
(d) Using the corrected data from part (b) and a 95% confidence interval, is
there evidence to support the claim that the variability in mileage performance is
greater for a Volkswagen than for a Mercedes?