Cortical Visual Impairment: Pediatrics in Review November 2009
Cortical Visual Impairment: Pediatrics in Review November 2009
Cortical Visual Impairment: Pediatrics in Review November 2009
net/publication/38062379
CITATIONS READS
10 2,943
1 author:
Luis H Ospina
CHU Sainte-Justine
40 PUBLICATIONS 646 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Luis H Ospina on 09 July 2015.
The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/30/11/e81
Pediatrics in Review is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly
publication, it has been published continuously since 1979. Pediatrics in Review is owned,
published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point
Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois, 60007. Copyright © 2009 by the American Academy of
Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0191-9601.
Definition
Vision loss caused by central nervous system damage often is referred to as CVI but also
may be referred to as cerebral visual impairment or neurologic visual impairment. These
terms refer to the fact that the primary defect may not necessarily be limited to the striate
(primary visual) cortex and may affect other areas subserving vision, such as the visual
associative cortex, optic radiations, and visual attention pathways. Although it is not yet
certain which of these three terms best describes the visual deficit, it is clear that use of the
label cortical blindness must be abandoned. That term not only evokes negative connota-
tions for the child and the family but is inaccurate because in almost every instance, some
degree of residual vision remains, and visual improvement can occur.
Epidemiology
CVI has become the greatest cause of pediatric visual impairment in developed countries
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and is becoming increasingly prevalent in developing nations. CVI is a
problem of increasing frequency for two primary reasons. First, the progress in neonatal
care has resulted in improved survival of children who have brain damage from hypoxia. As
a result, these children may suffer from CVI. (6)(7)(8) Second, the better outcomes
associated with improved treatment of other causes of pediatric vision loss such as
retinopathy of prematurity and congenital cataracts have diminished their roles as causes of
pediatric blindness. (9)
Various studies from the developed world illustrate the
preeminent place of CVI among the causes of pediatric visual
damage. Comparing current findings with previous preva-
Abbreviations lence studies, a population-based prospective study in five
Nordic countries identified an increase from 11% to 23% in
CT: computed tomography
the relative frequency of CVI as a cause of pediatric blind-
CVI: cortical visual impairment
ness. (7) Along with optic atrophy, CVI accounted for 45%
MRI: magnetic resonance imaging
of cases of pediatric blindness in this study. In a recent survey
PVL: periventricular leukomalacia
of blind children in Ireland, the most common morphologic
VEP: visual evoked potentials
diagnoses were optic atrophy, optic nerve hypoplasia, and
*Assistant Professor, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Neuro-ophthalmology, Ste-Justine Hospital, University de Montreal,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
is greater delay in visual development than in other areas who are unable to gaze directly because of eye or head
and when the degree of vision loss is unexplained by movement problems, which are not uncommon in CVI.
ocular findings. (48) Such a situation, paired with a (55) It is possible to attempt to determine whether
characteristic clinical history such as hypoxia, should alert fixation or following capacity exists, but the inherent
the clinician to the presence of CVI. In a typical case of fluctuation of vision cannot be ignored in children whose
CVI, results of the eye examination are normal, although vision can be influenced by fatigue, light conditions, or
this is not always the case. Concomitant ophthalmologic an unfamiliar environment. Therefore, obtaining an idea
problems such as optic atrophy, nystagmus, and other of a child’s daily visual behavior is more important than
conditions very frequently accompany CVI. This situa- assigning a numeric value to the visual acuity. Comments
tion is exemplified by the preterm baby who is treated from the family as to how the child functions in his or her
successfully for retinopathy of prematurity, but whose environment can be very useful.
vision remains deficient and insufficiently explained by
the ocular findings. In such a case, coexistence of some
degree of CVI, often from PVL, should be considered. Associated Neurologic and Ophthalmologic
Habits that represent adaptations to the disease fre- Abnormalities
quently are present in patients who have CVI. Most patients who have CVI have associated neurologic
(1)(49)(50) Such habits are appropriately termed “neu- deficits. Khetpal and Donahue (12) found that 65.3% of
robehavioral” signs and may aid in the diagnosis. To a children who had CVI had neurologic deficits. Whiting
large extent, many of these signs were identified and and associates (48) found that all of the patients in their
study had some degree of neurologic deficit, and Wong
described by James Jan, a pediatric neurologist who has
(56) found deficits present in all congenital cases in her
contributed enormously to the understanding of CVI in
series. Epilepsy, cerebral palsy, hemiparesis, microceph-
children. Light-gazing, a tendency to stare at bright light
aly, hydrocephalus, hearing problems, abnormal mental
(eg, the sun or fluorescent lights), is frequent even in
development, behavioral problems, myelomeningocele,
children who do not otherwise fixate. (51) Flicking the
progressive degenerative disorders, and hypotonia are
fingers in front of the eyes against the light for self-
among the reported anomalies, indicating that the dam-
stimulation sometimes is seen. (52) Enigmatically, pho-
age may not be limited to the visual pathways.
tophobia can be prominent and sometimes even coexist
(2)(11)(12)(48)(56)
with light-gazing. (53) The explanation for this phe-
Associated ocular findings, such as optic atrophy,
nomenon is unknown, but thalamic or cortical damage
nystagmus, strabismus, gaze palsy, and retinal disease,
may be responsible. also are common. (2)(5)(11)(12)(48)(56) Although the
A highly variable visual performance also is character- absence of nystagmus in a case of congenital visual inat-
istic, with such variation even seen from hour to hour. tention suggests a cerebral cause, it is now known that
(48) Children who have very limited vision may appear the presence of nystagmus should not dissuade the clini-
unexpectedly very responsive to color stimulation. (52) cian from diagnosing CVI in the appropriate setting.
Such a response possibly is due to the bilateral cerebral Nystagmus may result from concomitant anterior path-
representation of color, which is less likely to be elimi- way disease, such as optic nerve or retinal disease, or it
nated unless the lesions are very extensive. Head shaking may indicate subcortical rather than cortical damage.
often is present, (54) as is pronounced head turns to (57) In fact, nystagmus is common in PVL. (58) When
search for objects, conceivably to make use of residual optic atrophy coexists with CVI, clinical judgment is
peripheral vision. (52) Visual function also appears to be needed to define the relative contribution of each factor
better in more familiar environments. (48) to the visual limitation.
Obtaining a measurement of visual acuity can be Consideration of both the clinical presentation and
challenging in a child who suffers from accompanying neuroimaging findings often is sufficient to diagnose
neurologic deficits. If optotypes (standardized tables to CVI. Nonetheless, certain entities should be included in
test visual acuity) prove useless, preferential looking can the differential diagnosis for this disorder. The lack of
be attempted (ie, Teller Acuity Cards, in which high- interest characteristic of autism, the inability to generate
contrast gratings of different spatial frequencies are saccades (fast eye movements) in a child who has oculo-
shown beside blank areas on the same card). The child motor apraxia, or simply a delay in visual maturation may
usually prefers to fixate on the pattern of such cards, if simulate CVI, but in these cases, the diagnosis of CVI is
seen. Even this method has limitations in testing patients inappropriate.
Visual Improvement
Some improvement of vision virtually always occurs in
children who have CVI. The mechanism by which im-
provement occurs continues to be a topic of interesting
debate. In many cases, the likely explanation may be the
Figure 4. Head computed tomography scan for an 11-month- presence of residual visual potential, which gradually
old child who had prior cardiac arrest shows diffuse severe improves over time. (78) Improvement also may result
bifrontal and temporal cortical atrophy as well as lacunar from the sparing of some areas rather than total destruc-
infarcts in the basal ganglia (arrows). The occipital lobes are tion of visual cortical function at the time of injury. (48)
spared. Nonetheless, the fascinating changes observed in an-
imals make it difficult to ignore the possibility that more
sion tomography in patients who had CVI in whom MRI sophisticated responses to early damage of central vision
had revealed no abnormalities. may occur in humans. Some studies strongly support this
hypothesis. Research in cats whose visual cortex (areas
Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) 17, 18, 19) is ablated is particularly worthy of mention.
The role of VEP in confirming the diagnosis of CVI in The results could be summarized as anatomic and phys-
children and predicting visual outcome has been ad- iologic. After cortical lesions are produced, anterograde
dressed in many studies, and the subject is not free of and retrograde tracing methods reveal a response that
controversy. Different technical methods, such as “flash” consists of increased anatomic projections from the ret-
and “sweep,” are used to record potentials. Frank and
ina through the thalamus to the posteromedial lateral
Torres (71) did not find VEP valuable in diagnosing CVI
suprasylvian extrastriate visual area in neonatal but not in
because they were unable to identify differences in re-
adult cats. Also, the young cats, unlike the adult ones,
sponse between 30 children who had cortical loss of
demonstrate a functional compensation after cortical
vision and 31 who had neurologic lesions and no visual
ablation. Single-cell neurophysiologic responses mea-
involvement. Clarke and associates (72) found a low
positive predictive value (45.1%) for flash VEP because sured at least 6 months later in the posteromedial lateral
14 of 31 children who had abnormal responses remained suprasylvian cortex achieve normality. (79)(80) Al-
impaired and low specificity (39.3%) because only 11 of though the cells in the latter area do not acquire the
28 infants who showed improvement had had normal properties of the superior striate cortex, they do develop
results on VEP. Other authors have demonstrated that a receptive field properties. (81) Similarly, young monkeys
bad VEP result does not necessarily mean a poor future whose striate cortex is damaged, unlike older ones, dem-
visual outcome. (73)(74) onstrate a capacity to respond to stimuli in the hemifield
Nevertheless, other investigators have reported better opposite the ablation as well as the ability to localize
utility of VEP in the evaluation of pediatric CVI. Taylor those stimuli with eye movements 2 to 5 years after the
and McCulloch (75) reported that abnormal flash VEP injury. (82)
Beyond the Striate Cortex optic radiation correlated with a poor visual prognosis.
As mentioned, children afflicted with CVI seldom Other causes of CVI such as bacterial meningitis and
present with isolated lesions of the striate cortex. The epilepsy have been associated in the past with a poorer
associative areas of the occipital cortex or temporal or outcome. (44)(56) However, factors other than cause
parietal cortices frequently are affected, sometimes pre- (eg, timing of the insult, severity) must be considered for
dominantly. (69) Aside from abnormal visual acuity, each case. For example, Huo and associates (2) did not
many children who have CVI exhibit particular higher find a correlation between cause and prognosis.
visual deficits (cognitive visual disorders), and these def- More than 90% of children who have CVI remain
icits can occur in conjunction with preserved visual acu- visually handicapped despite some improvement of vi-
ity. (17)(83)(84)(85) Such deficits might result from sion. Their neurodevelopmental outcomes other than
lesions to the dorsal (parietal lobe, impaired ability to vision also remain poor. (11)
handle complex scenes) or the ventral (temporal lobe,
impaired recognition) stream systems. (8) Saidkasimova Rehabilitation and Management
and associates (86) published a series involving seven Early diagnosis and intervention are important in man-
children who had impaired perception of movement, aging pediatric CVI. (3)(90) Groups who have substan-
simultagnosia (one or some isolated elements of a visual tial experience in caring for affected patients have made
scene can be recognized, but not the whole complex specific suggestions concerning rehabilitation. Reducing
scene), visuomotor dysfunction, and impaired orienta- the amount of visual stimulation by presenting simple
tion. All exhibited some degree of periventricular white rather than crowded visual environments is believed to
matter anomaly. It is important to recognize that CVI enhance vision in children who have CVI. Cueing by
can involve much more than reduced visual acuity. (87) language, touch, and using contrasting colors are among
It has been suggested that evaluating the damage seen the many useful strategies for optimizing residual vision.
on neuroimaging to structures involved with mecha- A multidisciplinary approach for each child is essential.
nisms of visual attention may be of interest. A child who (3)
has poor vision potentially could have difficulties “choos- Because CVI almost is never an isolated problem, it is
ing” among multiple presented images because of lesions important to diagnose and treat any accompanying neu-
involving visual spatial attention (frontal lobe, globus rologic conditions. Pediatric neurologists, developmen-
pallidus, caudate, putamen, and thalamus) or selection of tal pediatricians, and occupational therapists can be of
stimulus for attention (inferior parietal cortex, superior help. Providing the best possible control of associated
colliculus, pulvinar) structures. This possibility has been seizures that may interfere with visual function by opti-
discussed in detail by Hoyt, (69) and it may apply not mizing their pharmacologic treatment also may alter
only to cases of CVI in which the imaging findings of the visual behavior. Facilitating access to special services for
striate and parastriate cortices and periventricular regions concomitant cerebral palsy may help. (2)
appear preserved, but also to more typical cases such as Sleep disorders affect children who have visual impair-
CVI from PVL. Recent evidence confirms that thalamic ment, resulting not only from deregulation of the effect
damage, for example, is frequent in PVL. (88)(89) that vision is known to have on the sleep-wake cycle, but
also from concomitant neurodevelopmental abnormali-
Prognosis ties. Detailed descriptions of the effects of melatonin and
Almost all children afflicted with CVI show some degree other treatment interventions are discussed elsewhere,
of visual improvement with time. Using different criteria, (91)(92)(93)(94)(95) but we can testify to the benefits
Matsuba and Jan (11) found overall improvement of of enrollment in a pediatric sleep clinic.
visual acuity in 46% of patients, and Huo and associates Only in limited circumstances is a treatment directed
(2) noted improvement in 60%. The level of vision at the specific cause of CVI. Two examples are hydro-
achieved depends on many factors, including the cause, cephalus or shunt blockage, in which the appropriate
age of onset, and severity and type of injury. (1) Children surgical intervention is therapeutic.
who have subcortical damage seem to have a worse The pediatric ophthalmologist or neuroophthalmolo-
prognosis. In a retrospective study, Hoyt (5) found some gist is expected to play a role not only in assisting with the
recovery of vision in 78% of children who had striate diagnosis of CVI but also in identifying associated ocular
cortex injury compared with 42% of children who had abnormalities and treating them when possible. For ex-
periventricular white matter involvement. Lambert and ample, a child who has CVI and significant myopia may
colleagues (59) found that imaging abnormality of the benefit from glasses. Every person involved in the care of
an affected child must remember that the early promo- 5. Hoyt CS. Visual function in the brain-damaged child. Eye.
tion of visual development results in better outcomes. 2003;17:369 –384
6. Haddad MA, Sei M, Sampaio MW, Kara-José N. Causes of
(90) Clinicians must direct the child as soon as possible
visual impairment in children: a study of 3,210 cases. J Pediatr
to institutions capable of providing structured strategies Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2007;44:232–240
and facilitate access to services provided by the health and 7. Rosenberg T, Flage T, Hansen E, et al. Incidence of registered
educational systems. visual impairment in the Nordic child population. Br J Ophthalmol.
1996;80:49 –53
8. Dutton GN, McKillop EC, Saidkasimova S. Visual problems as a
result of brain damage in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:
Summary 932–933
9. Good WV. Development of a quantitative method to measure
• Most cases of CVI, the primary cause of pediatric vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment. Trans Am
visual impairment in developed countries, are caused Ophthalmol Soc. 2001;99:253–269
by hypoxia-ischemia. The moment at which the 10. Murphy D, Good WV. The epidemiology of blindness in
insult occurs determines, to a large extent, the children [abstract]. Presented at American Academy of Ophthal-
pattern of cerebral damage. mology, San Francisco, Calif. 1997
• Preterm babies tend to develop subcortical injuries in 11. Matsuba CA, Jan JE. Long-term outcome of children with
the form of periventricular leukomalacia and have a cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:
worse prognosis; in term newborns, parasagittal 508 –512
infarctions are more common. Combined subcortical 12. Khetpal V, Donahue SP. Cortical visual impairment: etiology,
and cortical lesions are not uncommon. associated findings, and prognosis in a tertiary care setting. J AA-
• Advances in neuroimaging and research performed POS. 2007;11:235–239
mostly in animals have provided a better 13. Edmond JC, Foroozan R. Cortical visual impairment in chil-
understanding of the visual pathways involved in CVI dren. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:509 –512
and the molecular mechanisms of the damage. 14. Pike MG, Holmstrom G, de Vries LS, et al. Patterns of visual
• Attention now is being directed to the involvement impairment associated with lesions of the preterm infant brain. Dev
of visual functions other than acuity in CVI, such as Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:849 – 862
the “cognitive” aspects. Neuroanatomic correlation 15. Roland EH, Jan JE, Hill A, Wong PK. Cortical visual impair-
with these other aspects of vision gradually is ment following birth asphyxia. Pediatr Neurol. 1986;2:133–137
becoming available. 16. Jacobson LK, Dutton GN. Periventricular leukomalacia: an
• In spite of the progress in diagnostic methods, important cause of visual and ocular motility dysfunction in chil-
interventional treatments for CVI are still very dren. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:1–13
limited, and management remains restricted to 17. Dutton GN, Jacobson LK. Cerebral visual impairment in chil-
assistance in rehabilitation and education. Such dren. Semin Neonatol. 2001;6:477– 485
support must include a multidisciplinary approach 18. Takashima S, Tanaka K. Development of cerebrovascular ar-
that addresses the psychosocial impact on patients chitecture and its relationship to periventricular leukomalacia. Arch
and their families. Neurol. 1978;35:11–16
• Because the neurologic damage capable of affecting 19. Back SA, Luo NL, Borenstein NS, Levine JM, Volpe JJ, Kinney
vision usually results in other neurologic handicaps, HC. Late oligodendrocyte progenitors coincide with the develop-
integrated treatment is required. mental window of vulnerability for human perinatal white matter
injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1302–1312
20. McQuillen PS, Sheldon RA, Shatz CJ, Ferriero DM. Selective
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. The author thanks Mrs. vulnerability of subplate neurons after early neonatal hypoxia-
ischemia. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3308 –3315
Monique Grimard and Dr Alexandre de Saint-Sardos for
21. Haynes RL, Folkerth RD, Keefe RJ, et al. Nitrosative and
their invaluable aid in preparing this article. oxidative injury to premyelinating oligodendrocytes in periven-
tricular leukomalacia. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:441– 450
22. Ferriero DM. Neonatal brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:
References 1985–1995
1. Good WV, Jan JE, DeSa L, Barkovich AJ, Groenveld M, Hoyt 23. Kanold PO, Kara P, Reid RC, Schatz CJ. Role of the subplate
CS. Cortical visual impairment in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994; neurons in functioning maturation of visual cortical columns. Sci-
38:351–364 ence. 2003;301:521–525
2. Huo R, Burden SK, Hoyt CS, Good WV. Chronic cortical visual 24. Hoyt CS. Hydrocephalus, brain anomalies and cortical visual
impairment in children: aetiology, prognosis, and associated neu- impairment. In: Taylor D, Hoyt CS, eds. Pediatric Ophthalmology
rological deficits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:670 – 675 and Strabismus. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier Saunders; 2005:
3. Groenveld M, Jan JE, Leader P. Observations on the habilita- 675– 686
tion of children with cortical visual impairment. J Vis Impair Blind- 25. DeSousa AL, Kleiman MB, Mealey J Jr. Quadriplegia and
ness. 1990;84:11–15 cortical blindness in Hemophilus influenzae meningitis. J Pediatr.
4. Goggin M, O’Keefe M. Childhood blindness in the Republic of 1978;93:253–254
Ireland: a national survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:425– 429 26. Margolis LH, Shaywitz BA, Rothman SG. Cortical blindness
associated with occipital atrophy: a complication of H. influenzae 47. Good WV, Jan JE, Burden SK, Skoczenski A, Candy R. Recent
meningitis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1978;20:490 – 493 advances in cortical visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol.
27. Tepperberg J, Nussbaum D, Feldman F. Cortical blindness 2001;43:56 – 60
following meningitis due to Hemophilus influenzae type B. J Pedi- 48. Whiting S, Jan JE, Wong PK, Flodmark O, Farrell K, McCor-
atr. 1977;91:434 – 436 mick AQ. Permanent cortical visual impairment in children. Dev
28. Acers TE, Cooper WC. Cortical blindness secondary to bacte- Med Child Neurol. 1985;27:730 –739
rial meningitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965;59:226 –229 49. Jan JE, Freeman RD, Scott EF. Stereotyped behavior. In:
29. Ackroyd RS. Cortical blindness following bacterial meningitis: Visual Impairment in Children and Adolescents. New York, NY:
a case report with reassessment of prognosis and aetiology. Dev Med Grune and Stratton; 1977:239 –255
Child Neurol. 1984;26:227–230 50. Good WV, Hoyt CS. Behavioral correlates of poor vision in
30. Treister G, Stein R, Kosary IZ. Acute non-supporative menin- children. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1989;29:57– 60
goencephalitis associated with transient amaurosis. Am J Ophthal- 51. Jan JE, Groenveld M, Sykanda AM. Light-gazing by visually
mol. 1969;68:105–107 impaired children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990;32:755–759
31. El Azazi M, Malm G, Forsgren M. Late ophthalmologic man- 52. Jan JE, Groenveld M, Sykanda AM, Hoyt CS. Behavioural
ifestations of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Am J Ophthal- characteristics of children with permanent cortical visual impair-
mol. 1990;109:1–7 ment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1987;29:571–576
32. Brodsky M, Baker RS, Hamed LM. The apparently blind 53. Jan JE, Groenveld M, Anderson DP. Photophobia and cortical
infant. In: Pediatric Neuroophthalmology. New York, NY: Springer- visual impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:110 –116
Verlag; 1996:1– 41 54. Jan JE, Groenveld M, Connolly MB. Head shaking by visually
33. Thun-Hohenstein L, Schmitt B, Steinlin H, Martin E, Bolt- impaired children: a voluntary neurovisual adaptation which can be
shauser E. Cortical visual impairment following bacterial meningi-
confused with spasmus nutans. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990;32:
tis: magnetic resonance imaging and visual evoked potentials find-
1061–1066
ings in two cases. Eur J Pediatr. 1992;151:779 –782
55. Jan JE, Groenveld M. Visual behaviors and adaptations associ-
34. Fernell E, Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Von Wendt L. Epidemiol-
ated with cortical and ocular impairment in children. J Vis Impair
ogy of infantile hydrocephalus in Sweden. I. Birth prevalence and
Blind. 1993;87:101–105
general data. Acta Pediatr Scand. 1985;75:975–981
56. Wong VC. Cortical blindness in children: a study of etiology
35. Persson EK, Anderson S, Wiklund LM, Uvebrant P. Hydro-
and prognosis. Pediatr Neurol. 1991;7:178 –185
cephalus in children born in 1999 –2002: epidemiology, outcome
and ophthalmological findings. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007;23:
57. Brodsky MC, Fray KJ, Glasier CM. Perinatal cortical and
1111–1118 subcortical visual loss: mechanisms of injury and associated ophthal-
36. Houliston MJ, Taguri AH, Dutton GN, Hajivassiliou C, mologic signs. Ophthalmolology. 2002;109:85–94
Young DG. Evidence of cognitive visual problems in children with 58. Jacobson L, Ygge J, Flodmark O. Nystagmus in periventricular
hydrocephalus: a structured clinical history-taking strategy. Dev leucomalacia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:1026 –1032
Med Child Neurol. 1999;41:298 –306 59. Lambert SR, Hoyt CS, Jan JE, Barkovich J, Flodmark O.
37. Arroyo HA, Jan JE, McCormick AQ, Farrell K. Permanent Visual recovery from hypoxic cortical blindness during childhood.
visual loss after shunt malfunction. Neurology. 1985;35:25–29 Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging predic-
38. Corbett JJ. Neuro-ophthalmologic complications of hydro- tors. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1371–1377
cephalus and shunting procedures. Semin Neurol. 1986;6:111–123 60. Eken P, de Vries LS, van Nieuwenhuizen O, Schalij-Delfos
39. Sakas DE, Whittaker KW, Whitwell HL, Singounas EG. Syn- NE, Reits D, Spekreijse H. Early predictors of cerebral visual
dromes of posttraumatic neurological deterioration in children with impairment in infants with cystic leukomalacia. Neuropediatrics.
no focal lesions revealed by cerebral imaging: evidence for a trigemi- 1996;27:16 –25
novascular pathophysiology. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:661– 667 61. Eken P, de Vries LS, van der Graaf Y, Meiners LC, van
40. Rodriguez A, Lozano JA, del Pozo D, Homar Paez J. Post- Nieuwenhuizen O. Haemorrhagic-ischaemic lesions of the neona-
traumatic transient cortical blindness. Int Ophthalmol. 1993;17: tal brain: correlation between cerebral visual impairment, neurode-
277–283 velopmental outcome and MRI in infancy. Dev Med Child Neurol.
41. Eldridge PR, Punt JA. Transient traumatic cortical blindness in 1995;37:41–55
children. Lancet. 1988;1:815– 816 62. Flodmark O, Roland EH, Hill A, Whitfield MF. Periventricular
42. Castano G, Lyons CJ, Jan JE, Connolly M. Cortical visual leukomalacia: radiologic diagnosis. Radiology. 1987;162:119 –124
impairment in children with infantile spasms. J AAPOS. 2000;4: 63. Flodmark O, Lupton B, Li D, et al. MR imaging of periven-
175–178 tricular leukomalacia in childhood. Am J Neuroradiol. 1989;10:
43. Remler BF, Leigh RJ, Osorio I, Tomsak RL. The characteris- 111–118
tics and mechanisms of visual disturbance associated with anticon- 64. Lanzi G, Fazzi E, Uggetti C, et al. Cerebral visual impairment
vulsant therapy. Neurology. 1990;40:791–796 in periventricular leukomalacia. Neuropediatrics. 1998;29:145–150
44. Chen TC, Weinberg MH, Catalano RA, Simon JW, Wagle 65. Ugetti C, Egitto M, Fazzi E, et al. Cerebral visual impairment
WA. Development of object vision in infants with permanent cor- in periventricular leukomalacia: MR correlation. Am J Neuroradiol.
tical visual impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;114:575–578 1996;17:979 –985
45. Mukamel M, Weitz R, Nissenkorn I, Yassur I, Varsano I. Acute 66. Casteels I, Demaerel P, Spileers W, Lagae L, Missotten L,
cortical blindness associated with hypoglycemia. J Pediatr. 1981; Casaer P. Cortical visual impairment following perinatal hypoxia:
98:583–584 clinicoradiologic correlation using magnetic resonance imaging.
46. Moel DI, Kwun YA. Cortical blindness as a complication of J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1997;34:297–305
hemodialysis. J Pediatr. 1978;93:890 – 891 67. Johnson MA, Pennock JM, Bydder GM, Dubowitz LM,
Thomas DJ, Young IR. Serial MR imaging in neonatal cerebral Greater residual vision in monkeys after striate cortex damage in
injury. Am J Neuroradiol. 1987;8:83–92 infancy. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:3928 –3933
68. Barcovich AJ. MR and CT evaluation of profound neonatal 83. Dutton GN. Cognitive visual dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol.
and infantile asphyxia. Am J Neuroradiol. 1992;13:959 –972 1994;78:723–726
69. Hoyt CS. Brain injury and the eye. Eye. 2007;21:1285–1289 84. Dutton GN, Saaed A, Fahad B, et al. Association of binocular
70. Silverman IE, Galetta SL, Gray LG, et al. SPECT in patients lower visual field impairment, impaired simultaneous perception,
with cortical visual loss. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1447–1451 disordered visually guided motion and inaccurate saccades in chil-
71. Frank Y, Torres F. Visual evoked potentials in the evaluation of dren with cerebral visual dysfunction–a retrospective observational
“cortical blindness” in children. Ann Neurol. 1979;6:126 –129 study. Eye. 2004;18:27–34
72. Clarke MP, Mitchell KW, Gibson M. The prognostic value of 85. Lowery RS, Atkinson D, Lambert SR. Cryptic cerebral visual
flash visual evoked potentials in the assessment of non-ocular visual impairment in children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:960 –963
impairment in infancy. Eye. 1997;11:398 – 402 86. Saidkasimova S, Bennett DM, Butler S, Dutton GN. Cognitive
73. Granet DB, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Breton ME. The visual- visual impairment with good visual acuity in children with posterior
evoked response in infants with central visual impairment. Am J periventricular white matter injury: a series of 7 cases. J AAPOS.
Ophthalmol. 1993;116:437– 443 2007;11:426 – 430
74. Atkin A, Raab E, Wolkstein M. Visual association cortex and 87. Good WV. The spectrum of vision impairment caused by
vision in man: pattern-evoked occipital potentials in a blind boy. pediatric neurological injury. J AAPOS. 2007;11:424 – 425
Science. 1977;198:629 – 631 88. Ligam P, Haynes RL, Folkerth RD, et al. Thalamic damage in
75. Taylor MJ, McCulloch DL. Prognostic value of VEPs in young periventricular leukomalacia: novel pathologic observations rele-
children with acute onset of cortical blindness. Pediatr Neurol. vant to cognitive deficits in survivors of prematurity. Pediatr Res.
1991;7:111–115 2009;65:524 –529
76. Kupersmith MJ, Nelson JI. Preserved visual evoked potential 89. Ricci D, Anker S, Cowan F, et al. Thalamic atrophy in infants
in infancy cortical blindness. Relation to blindsight. Neuroophthal- with PVL and cerebral visual impairment. Early Hum Dev. 2006;
mology. 1986;6:85–94 82:591–595
77. Good WV, Hou C. Sweep visual evoked potential grating 90. Sonksen PM, Petric A, Drew KJ. Promotion of visual develop-
acuity thresholds paradoxically improve in low-luminance condi- ment of severely visually impaired babies: evaluation of a develop-
tions in children with cortical visual impairment. Invest Ophthalmol mentally based programme. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1991;33:
Vis Sci. 2006;47:3220 –3224 320 –335
78. Hoyt CS, Nickel BL, Billson FA. Ophthalmological examina- 91. Leger D, Prevot E, Philip P, et al. Sleep disorders in children
tion of the infant: developmental aspects. Survey Ophthalmol. 1982; with blindness. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:648 – 651
26:177–189 92. Brennan R, Jan JE, Lyons CJ. Light, dark and melatonin:
79. Spear PD. Plasticity following neonatal visual cortex damage in emerging evidence for the importance of melatonin in ocular phys-
cats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1995;73:1389 –1397 iology. Eye. 2007;21:901–908
80. Spear PD, Kalil RE, Tong L. Functional compensation in 93. Jan JE, Freeman RD, Fast DK. Melatonin treatment of sleep-
lateral suprasylvian visual area following neonatal visual cortex wake cycle disorders in children and adolescents. Dev Med Child
removal in cats. J Neurophysiol. 1980;43:851– 869 Neurol. 1999;41:491–500
81. Guido W, Spear PD, Tong L. How complete is physiological 94. Jan JE, O’Donnell ME. Use of melatonin in the treatment of
compensation in extrastriate cortex after visual cortex damage in paediatric sleep disorders. J Pineal Res. 1996;21:193–199
kittens? Exp Brain Res. 1992;91:455– 466 95. Stores G. Medication for sleep-wake disorders. Arch Dis Child.
82. Moore T, Rodman HR, Repp AB, Gross CG, Mezrich RS. 2003;88:899 –903
Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/30/11/e81
References This article cites 91 articles, 22 of which you can access for free
at:
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/content/30/11/e81#BIB
L
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Neurologic Disorders
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/neurologi
c_disorders
Disorders of the Eye
http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/cgi/collection/eye_disor
ders
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,
tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
/site/misc/reprints.xhtml