All Girls Classrooms

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Are All-Girls Classrooms More Conducive to Academic Achievement in Math and

Science?

Deyanira Garcia Zea

Educational Psychology 602

Texas A&M University

February 17, 2010


Abstract

This critique evaluates some of the research done on the benefits as well as
disadvantages of all girls classrooms and the impact on their academic achievement as it
relates to math and science, which are fields usually dominated by males. There have
been many studies that contrast the differences between coed and single-gender
classrooms and the long-term benefits in high school and even post-secondary schools.
The findings of research are quite controversial, and they are still inconclusive as to the
real long-term benefits of single-gender schools especially for girls.

One relevant point in the studies is that there is some agreement among
researchers who support this theory, that the best alternative is to adapt public coed
schools to the system of single-gender classes for math and science, instead of
establishing a whole school segregation approach. (Shapka J. D., 2003).

Some of these studies, both in favor and against single-gender schooling, have
been highly criticized for the lack of proper statistical procedures, others for the
population samples focusing on private, public or catholic schools only, but many
researchers believe that there is a significant need to continue to investigate this issue and
seem to have reached an agreement that it is crucial for education in the U.S., to establish
what works in either catholic, private or single gender classes in coed schools and be able
to replicate it in any of those environments.

2
Introduction

The issue of gender in the schools has been investigated for many years, not only
in the United States but also in Europe and Asia. In order to address this gender question
and its relationship to academic achievement in math and science, it is compelling to start
by analyzing the teacher-student interactions in the classroom. Empirical findings suggest
that the interest boys and girls possess towards science is affected by the way teachers
interact with them. Furthermore, studies support the view that males receive more
attention from teachers and their learning is more encouraged in science classes than their
females’ counterparts. Additionally, male and female teachers seem to also have higher
expectations for boys in math and science than for girls. Research on the behaviors of
parents and families also suggests that their expectations about boys and girls and
scientific subjects are also heavily influenced by stereotypes. (Hoffmann, 2002)

One view against single-gender classes is that by separating boys and girls we
would create a social environment that does not exist in the real world, where men and
women compete professionally. However, the opposite view contends that on the
contrary, coed classrooms reflect too closely a reality of a world that is filled with
stereotypes and where men still have advantages over women especially in the scientific
field. (Shapka J. D., 2003)

Review of Literature

It is interesting to review the different research studies performed in different continents


have many points in common stemming from both supporters and detractors of single-
gender schooling. There was a longitudinal study carried out in the Quebec, Canada to
assess the impact of segregation in mathematics achievement of boys and girls. The
sample population was taken from eight public coed schools and two public all-girls
schools. Their result was that there is no significant impact on the achievement in
mathematics for girls in either school. They concluded that rather than taking the costly
measure of segregating schools, more efforts must be directed towards improving
teachers’ pedagogical methods. (Chouinard, 2008)

3
The main problem in dealing with research in this issue is that there are many
external factors that affect achievement, such as socioeconomic background, innate
ability, motivation whether intrinsic or imposed by parents. Therefore, as long as these
factors cannot be controlled there will always be room for criticism and for selection bias;
which is a distortion resulting from the method of collecting samples, then any
conclusions drawn may be wrong, attracting more and more controversy. (Jimenez,
1989)

Some retractors accuse single-gender schools of being anticuated and backwards


and that it does not foster socialization development but one thing to ponder about is that
if this is true why was the amendment of 1972 which prohibited teaching mathematics in
single-gender classed revoked in 2002? Making such a major decision must be somehow
backed by research, even if inconclusive, there is definitely “reasonable doubt” to allow
the option of segregating, at least for math courses.

Conclusion

Single-gender school numbers are one the rise in the United States since the
issuance of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, which authorizes the use of any
innovative and creative method of teaching. In response to this modification, as of the
2007-2008 school year there were 97 single-sex public schools and 295 coed schools
were imparting single-sex courses. (Billger, 2009). It seems that this trend is on the rise.
Even though the research is inconclusive, to some extent there is some consensus that the
beneficiaries of single-gender education in math and science are girls and that coed
classes seem to be better for boys. The key is to continue exploring and conducting
research in this fascinating and controversial area and find a balance of what works for
each. Additionally, the research is clear that teachers treat each differently according to
the subject, then this may also be the root of the problem on why girls are not motivated
to pursue careers in these fields. The focus should then be on teachers’ education.

4
References

Billger, S. M. (2009). On reconstructing school segregation: The efficacy and


equity of single-sex schooling. Economics of Education Review , 28, 393–402.

Chouinard, e. a. (2008). Coeducational or single-sex school: does it make a


difference on high school girls’ academic motivation? Educational Studies , 34 (2), 129-
144.

Hoffmann, L. (2002). Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes


for beginners. Learning and Instruction , 12 (5), 447-465.

Jimenez, E. (1989). Enhancing Girls' Learning through Single-Sex Education:


Evidence and a Policy Conundrum. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 11 (2),
117-142.

Shapka, J. D. (2003). Effects of a Girls-Only Curriculum During Adolescence:


Performance, Persistence and Engagement in Mathematics and Science. American
Educational Research Journal. 40 (4), 929-960.

You might also like