DR Moshiri - Class II Correction by Leveraging Molar Rotation - 2
DR Moshiri - Class II Correction by Leveraging Molar Rotation - 2
DR Moshiri - Class II Correction by Leveraging Molar Rotation - 2
“Invisalign is an excellent appliance for use in treating Class II malocclusions with success. special attention to
correcting poor rotations of upper molars is very beneficial in treatment outcomes and progress, and their
correction achieves many important goals towards Class I progression.”
DR. MAZYAR MOSHIRI
Orthodontic correction of mild to moderate Class II malocclusions Here are Dr. Moshiri’s techniques for addressing Class II
with the Invisalign® system may be handled both predictably with Invisalign:
and efficiently. Dr. Mazyar Moshiri generally considers the
following variables below, in priority. Correction of any mesial Tip 1: Correct Any Mesial Rotation of Upper 1st and
2nd Molars
rotation of the maxillary molars tops this list. It has been shown
that up to 85% Class II patients have mesial rotation of their Request that the buccal surfaces of the upper molars are near
maxillary 1st molars.1 parallel to each other on the ClinCheck® treatment plan. The
majority of Class II malocclusions have a relative maxillary
When correcting a unilateral or bilateral Class II dental
transverse discrepancy, and considering the mechanics needed
malocclusion, it is important to carefully evaluate the etiology
for Class II correction involve the maxillary molars being directed
of the Class II relationships. One cause for displacement of the
towards a wider part of the arch, the doctor should request
molars is mesial movement into the leeway space left during
adequate expansion during the rotational corrections.
the transition from mixed to permanent dentition. This creates a
loss of arch length and resultant mesial version of the remaining Due to the rhomboidal shape of the upper first molars,
dentition anteriorly, creating a Class II cuspid relationship and correction of mesial rotations alone may open up to 2-3 mm
increased overjet. Any further mesial drift from anterior crowding of space per side for subsequent distalization of bicuspids and
and/or arch constriction further exacerbates this problem. cuspids. The decision to use a beveled vertical attachment
Correction of molar rotation not only helps to classify the molars (beveled distal towards the direction of the force), will depend
into a Class I relationship, but concomitantly opens room for on whether additional distalization of the molars is required in
subsequent distalization and Class I correction of the remaining combination with rotational corrections, as this decision may your
buccal dentition. change the attachment protocol. It is important to note even
without attachments rotational correction of molars with aligners
DR. MOSHIRI’S PRIORITY LIST FOR CLASS II alone is a predictable movement.
MALOCCLUSION CORRECTION WITH INVISALIGN
1
Liu D, Melsen B. Reappraisal of Class II molar relationships diagnosed from the lingual side. Clin Orthod Res. 2001;4(2):97-104.
Tip 2: Use Elastics Early and Often
One of the great benefits of Invisalign is the ability to initiate
Class II elastics early in treatment. Elastics are critical for
anchorage control and a predictable finish, especially considering
that simultaneous movements are known to be the most efficient
means of treatment. This means that as space is gained from
correction of molar rotations, space closure mesial to the molars
for distalization of the remaining buccal segment is also occurring.
This space closure needs to be controlled and directed distally.
The bite jump is used primarily to represent dental AP correction of expansion indicated on the ClinCheck treatment plan
of Class II / Class III malocclusion and autorotation closure may not express clinically, especially when using a lot of
of open bite patients, unless the treatment plan calls for Class II elastic wear which has a constrictive force on the
orthognathic surgery, or if mandibular growth is expected for maxillary arch. Dr. Moshiri believes expansion needs to be
teen patients. “over-engineered” in the ClinCheck treatment plan for
proper treatment of Class II patients as the software cannot
If segmental mechanics are being used, as in tooth-by-tooth
predict the constrictive force Class II elastic wear. Otherwise,
distalization mechanics, then a bite jump is not indicated. In
interocclusal interferences may prevent proper occlusion.
this case, the practitioner would find it useful to evaluate the
particular stage of movement indicated on the ClinCheck 2. Anticipate Enough Anterior Torque for Proper Anterior
treatment plan against the actual clinical outcome occurring with Centric Contacts: Anterior lingual root torque is another
the patient’s dentition to properly track treatment success. movement that should be over-prescribed (by about 20%)
for the movement to occur clinically. First, diagnose how
Tip 4: Use a Tooth Size Discrepancy (TSD) Analysis for much torque is required off cephalometric measurements,
First Molar to First Molar (6-6)
and then instruct your technician to add this amount into
Undiagnosed tooth size discrepancies (TSD) may be a significant the ClinCheck treatment plan. For example, if the upper
cause of occlusal instability and poor treatment outcomes. This incisors require 10 degrees of lingual root torque, ask the
information may be attained via the Bolton analysis for tooth size technician to add 12 degrees of lingual root torque. This is
discrepancies. Any known TSD is important knowledge to have very important as lack of anterior root torque will distalize the
for detailing the occlusion and increasing the opportunity for mandible from heavy centric contacts, creating a Class II bite
treatment success. Given your patients’ anterior esthetics and a mild posterior open bite.
(i.e. small upper laterals), buccal occlusion, depth of bite, etc., Bite ramps (bite turbos) lingual to the upper incisors further
any existing tooth size discrepancy may be used to the clinicians’ increase the predictability of this movement. The lingual
advantage to further treat a Class II malocclusion predictably. force from the lower incisors against the bite ramp, facilitated
by the propulsive movement of the mandible forward from
For example, if at the end of the ClinCheck treatment plan the
Class II elastics, helps to seat the aligner anteriorly while
patient is still Class II in the premolar and canine areas and a
providing a counter moment to the Power Ridge on the
maxillary excess is indicated on the TSD analysis, then this may
buccal of the aligner. If the patient is Class II division 2, ask for
be used to create any further space needed for distalization or
the technician to push the teeth out first before placing bite
reduction of overjet. In another scenario, if a mandibular excess
ramps to allow for better for application of force relative to
is noted, IPR may be used for mesialization of the lower dentition
the center of resistance for the maxillary teeth.
with Class II elastics to further aid in Class I molar correction.
3. Use Aligner Chewies Daily: Instruct patients to use Aligner
Tips for Predictable Finishes Chewies on a daily basis to promote settling of the dentition
The above methodology has proven very valuable in Dr. Moshiri’s into the aligner. Ask patients to bite straight down (not side-
practice in evaluating and treating Class II patients with Invisalign. to-side like chewing gum) and to apply average pressure for
Here are some additional suggestions to further enhance 5 seconds at a time, walking the Chewie around the mouth,
treatment outcomes for Class II patients: focusing on areas where the majority of their movements are
occurring. Have patients use Chewies 2-3 times a day for
1. Request Adequate Expansion for Class II Correction: Ask for
10-15 minutes per exercise.
2 mm of buccal overjet on all teeth and avoid a “socked-in”
occlusion at the end of the ClinCheck treatment plan.
The reasoning behind this preference is that the amount
CLINICAL TIPS & TECHNIQUES
Disclosure: Dr. Mazyar Moshiri was provided an honorarium from Align for his presentation. The statements, views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author, and do not
necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Align Technology, Inc.
Align Technology, Inc. © 2013 Align Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Invisalign and ClinCheck,
2560 Orchard Pkwy among others, are registered trademarks of Align Technology, Inc.
San Jose, CA 95131 M20225 Rev B June 2013
WWW.INVISALIGN.COM