Wettability and Roughness Characteristics of Modified Wood Boards Using A Hot-Press
Wettability and Roughness Characteristics of Modified Wood Boards Using A Hot-Press
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the thermal modification process by hot-press
Received 8 March 2011 on the wettability and surface roughness characteristics of the eucalyptus wood boards. The roughness
Accepted 29 April 2011 measurements, average roughness (Ra ), and maximum roughness (Rmax ) were taken both parallel and per-
Available online 28 May 2011
pendicular to the grain using a fine stylus tracing technique. Contact angle measurements were obtained
using a goniometer system connected to a digital camera and computer system. The results showed that
Keywords:
surface roughness values of the modified wood boards using a hot-press significantly decreased with
Thermal modification
increasing press pressure and with decreasing temperature. The contact angle measurements indicated
Wettability
Contact angle
that the thermal modification had a significant influence on the surface wettability of the wood boards.
Surface roughness Statistical analyses showed significant differences in the surface roughness and contact angle values of
Wood boards the wood boards following thermal modification. The results acquired in this work provide important
information for future research and utilization of the thermally modified wood boards.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
0926-6690/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.04.024
1456 O. Unsal et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 34 (2011) 1455–1457
Table 1 deviation for each sample were calculated from 60 photo images. A
Experimental design of the thermal modification process.
total of 50 test samples, 10 samples for each treatment, were used
Modification Press pressure Press temperature Pressing duration for the CA measurements.
group (MPa) (◦ C) (min)
Control – – –
2.2.4. Statistical analyses
A 4 150 45
B 2 150 45 For the surface roughness and wettability, all multiple compar-
C 4 180 45 isons were first tested using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) at
D 2 180 45 P < 0.05. Significant differences between the mean values of treated
and untreated groups were determined using Duncan’s multiple
range test.
2.2. Methods
Table 2
Surface roughness results of the thermally modified wood boards.
Control 3.65 (1.65) abc 21.33 (6.44) a 6.01 (0.67) abcd 40.36 (7.43) a
A 1.44 (0.01) c 8.99 (2.61) b 2.22 (0.72) d 16.80 (3.07) e
B 3.31 (0.13) a 18.57 (5.34) ab 3.87 (0.01) bcd 25.76 (4.96) ce
C 2.99 (0.47) b 18.94 (6.04) ab 3.32 (0.31) cd 23.16 (3.94) d
D 3.60 (1.00) abc 21.21 (5.87) ab 5.80 (0.16) abcd 35.70 (4.98) bcde
Homogenous groups: letters in each column indicate groups that are statistically different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05. Comparisons were between
each control and its test.
O. Unsal et al. / Industrial Crops and Products 34 (2011) 1455–1457 1457
Table 3 Aydin, I., 2004. Activation of wood surfaces for glue bonds by mechanical pre-
Contact angle results of the thermally modified boards. treatment and its effects on some properties of veneer surfaces and plywood
panels. Appl. Surf. Sci. 233, 268–274.
Groups Wettability Aydin, I., Colakoglu, G., Hiziroglu, S., 2006. Surface characteristics of spruce veneers
and shear strength of plywood as a function of log temperature in peeling pro-
CA (◦ ) Duncan’s grouping
cess. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 6140–6147.
Control 63.83 (6.66) d Ayrilmis, N., Dundar, T., Candan, Z., Akbulut, T., 2009. Wettability of fire retardant
A 77.21 (6.90) cd treated laminated veneer lumber (LVL) manufactured from veneers dried at
B 87.88 (4.47) bcd different temperatures. BioResources 4 (4), 1536–1544.
C 90.51 (5.03) acd Burmester, A., 1973. Effect of heat-pressure-treatment of semi-dry wood on its
D 94.56 (2.78) a dimensional stability. Holz Roh- Werkst. 31, 237–243.
Candan, Z., Hiziroglu, S., McDonald, A.G., 2010. Surface quality of thermally com-
Homogenous groups: letters in each column indicate groups that are statistically pressed Douglas fir veneer. Mater. Des. 31, 3574–3577.
different according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05. Comparisons were Candan, Z., Buyuksari, U., Unsal, O., Korkut, S. Wettability and surface roughness of
between each control and its test. thermally modified plywood panels. BioResources, submitted for publication.
Dogu, D., Tirak, K., Candan, Z., Unsal, O., 2010. Anatomical investigation of thermally
compressed wood panels. BioResources 5 (4), 2640–2663.
Among the different reasons proposed to explain wettability Dundar, T., Ayrilmis, N., Candan, Z., 2008. Evaluation of surface roughness of lami-
change, the plasticization of lignin leading to a reorganization of nated veneer lumber (LVL) made from beech veneers treated with various fire
retardants and dried at different temperatures. Forest Prod. J. 58 (1/2), 71–76.
the lignocellulosic polymeric components of wood seems to be Giebeler, E., 1983. Dimensional stabilization of wood by moisture-heat-pressure-
the more probable explanation. All these results showed that high treatment. Holz Roh- Werkst. 41, 87–94.
temperatures, generally used for wood heat treatment, are not nec- Hakkou, M., Pétrissans, M., Zoulalian, A., Gérardin, P., 2005. Investigation of wood
wettability changes during heat treatment on the basis of chemical analysis.
essary to modify its hydrophilic properties, which can be modified Polym. Degrad. Stab. 89 (1), 1–5.
at lower temperatures. This change of wettability could have sig- JIS B 0601, 2001. Geometrical Product Specification (GPS) – Surface Texture: Profile
nificant consequences on the use of the material, in particular for Method – Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters. Japanese Indus-
trial Standard.
the adhesion of paints and coatings (Hakkou et al., 2005). Lu, Z., 2003. Chemical Coupling in Wood–Polymer Composites. Ph.D. Thesis,
The findings obtained in this study were in agreement with Louisiana State University, Agricultural and Mechanical College.
a previous study of thermally modified oriented strandboard by Militz, H., 2002. Thermal treatment of wood: European processes and their back-
ground. IRG/WP 02-40241.
Unsal et al. (2010). It was reported that the thermally modified
Seborg, R.M., Millett, M.A., Stamm, A.J., 1945. Heat-stabilized compressed wood
panels had greater contact angle values than those of the unmod- (Staypak). Mech. Eng. 67, 25–31.
ified panels. It was concluded that this modification resulted in a Stamm, A.J., 1964. Wood and Cellulose Science. Ronald Press, NY, USA.
Stamm, A.J., Haris, E.E., 1953. Chemical Processing of Wood. Chemical Publishing
relatively poor wettability.
Co., Inc., NY, USA.
Unsal, O., Candan, Z., 2007. Effects of press pressure and temperature on the moisture
4. Conclusions content, vertical density profile and Janka hardness of pine wood panels. In:
Proceedings of 10th International IUFRO Division – 5, Wood Drying Conference
, Orono, ME, USA, August 26–30.
The thermal modification process is a significant factor that Unsal, O., Candan, Z., 2008. Moisture content, vertical density profile and Janka hard-
influences the surface roughness and wettability of wood boards. ness of thermally compressed pine wood panels as a function of press pressure
Increasing the severity of thermal modification resulted in and temperature. Drying Technol. 26, 1165–1169.
Unsal, O., Kartal, S.N., Candan, Z., Arango, R.A., Clausen, C.A., Green, F., 2008. Pre-
smoother surfaces. The wettability properties of the treated boards liminary investigation of biological resistance, water absorption and swelling
were lower than those of the untreated boards. The improved of thermally compressed pine wood panels. In: IRG/WP 39th Annual Meeting ,
characteristics of the thermally modified wood boards offer many Istanbul, Turkey, May 25–29, 11 p.
Unsal, O., Kartal, S.N., Candan, Z., Arango, R.A., Clausen, C.A., Green, F., 2009. Decay
potential and attractive new opportunities to wood products indus- and termite resistance, water absorption and swelling of thermally compressed
try. wood panels. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 63 (5), 548–552.
Unsal, O., Candan, Z., Buyuksari, U., Korkut, S., Babiak, M., 2010. Effects of ther-
mal modification on surface characteristics of OSB panels. Wood Res. 55 (4),
References 51–57.
Wang, J., Cooper, P.A., 2004. Vertical density profiles in thermally compressed bal-
Aydin, I., Colakoglu, G., 2002. The effects of veneer drying temperature on wetta- sam fir wood. Forest Prod. J. 55 (5), 65–68.
bility, surface roughness and some properties of plywood. In: Proceedings of Wang, J., Cooper, P.A., 2005. Effect of grain orientation and surface wetting on vertical
the Sixth Panel Products Symposium , Landudno, Wales, UK, 9–11 October, pp. density profiles of thermally compressed fir and spruce. Holz Roh- Werkst. 63,
60–70. 397–402.