100% found this document useful (1 vote)
689 views2 pages

Clearfield Doctrine: Exhibit 8a

The Clearfield Doctrine established that when governments use private commercial paper like Federal Reserve Notes, they lose their sovereignty status and become no different than a private corporation. As a private corporation, the government must hold a contract with any individual to compel a specific performance and bring the contract as evidence in court. This 1942 Supreme Court case is important because it was decided after the US incorporated in 1925 and agreed to use the Federal Reserve's private currency. The Clearfield Doctrine means governments are bound by contract law when enforcing corporate statutes against individuals.

Uploaded by

Ramon Martinez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
689 views2 pages

Clearfield Doctrine: Exhibit 8a

The Clearfield Doctrine established that when governments use private commercial paper like Federal Reserve Notes, they lose their sovereignty status and become no different than a private corporation. As a private corporation, the government must hold a contract with any individual to compel a specific performance and bring the contract as evidence in court. This 1942 Supreme Court case is important because it was decided after the US incorporated in 1925 and agreed to use the Federal Reserve's private currency. The Clearfield Doctrine means governments are bound by contract law when enforcing corporate statutes against individuals.

Uploaded by

Ramon Martinez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Exhibit 8a

Clearfield Doctrine

All courts where dissolved in 2008 under the clearfield doctrine then became registered
companies on Dunn and Bradstreet company search. When governments enter the world of
commerce, they are subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation U.S v Burr
309 U.S 22. See 22, U.S CA 286 e Bank of US v Planters Bank of Georgia 6L Ed (Wheat 244.)
NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer government entities in that they
are demanding private monies and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They
are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In The Box. Clearfield Doctrine
- “private commercial paper is used by corporate government, then government loses its
sovereignty status and becomes no different than a mere private corporation” . Government
create and enforce CIVIL LAWS known as statues, acts and legislation created by the Bar
Association (set up by Rothschilds) which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of
CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete
transparency!

Governments Have Descended to the Level of Mere Private Corporations


Clearfield Doctrine Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v.
United States 318 U.S. 363- 371 1942 Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme
Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371
1942: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and
take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where private corporate
commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is concerned
. . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
entities entirely separate from government." What the Clearfield Doctrine is
saying is that when private commercial paper is used by corporate government,
then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no different than a
mere private corporation. As such, government then becomes bound by the
rules and laws that govern private corporations which means that if they intend
to compel an individual to some specific performance based upon its corporate
statutes or corporation rules, then the government, like any private corporation,
must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other commercial agreement
between it and the one upon who demands for specific performance are made.
And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or
commercial agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce
its demands, called statutes. This case is very important because it is a 1942 case
Exhibit 8a

that was decided after the UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its
"CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION" in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it
was decided AFTER the 'corporate government' agreed to use the currency of
the private corporation, the FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the
Federal Reserve Note, is still in use today. References: (i) Articles of
Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-
incorporation-of-u-scorp-company.pdf (ii) From The Great American Adventure
by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-
american-adventurecomplete-work-by-judge-dale.pdf [4] Corporations are not
and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist
on paper. 5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are
private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances
to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
bet they do! 6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot
promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL
LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law
of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency!
Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate
statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing
to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? [8] Enforcement of these
corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are
unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these
officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-
2000] (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-
corporation/

You might also like