Regional Groundwater Ow in An Area Mapped As Continuous Permafrost, NE Alaska (USA)
Regional Groundwater Ow in An Area Mapped As Continuous Permafrost, NE Alaska (USA)
Regional Groundwater Ow in An Area Mapped As Continuous Permafrost, NE Alaska (USA)
Fig. 1 Map showing the location of springs on the North Slope in eastern Alaska that were used extensively in this article. Springs
numbered from west to east
Previous knowledge larger quantities of water are needed. Williams and van
Everdingen (1973) produced a review paper on ground-
An understanding of groundwater dynamics in northern water investigations in permafrost regions of North
Alaska and other continuous permafrost regions has been America for the Second International Conference on
slow to develop. Part of the lack of progress is due to Permafrost. They presented material on the following
limited information on permafrost distribution, and a lack topics; permafrost and movement of groundwater, avail-
of demand for water-resource information in this sparsely ability of groundwater, icings, pingos and artesian
populated region. In the small villages with minimal water pressures, influence of permafrost on water quality,
needs, surface water (streams and lakes) generally is the methodology, studies of basin hydrology, investigations
source of choice. Interest in groundwater development is for pipeline projects, hydrologic model studies and
generally associated with resource development where research needs. Since their review, the number of
Fig. 2 Simple conceptual representation of the groundwater flow system in an area mapped as continuous permafrost in NE Alaska,
assuming that groundwater recharges through permafrost free areas of limestone on the south side of the Brooks Range and discharges
through taliks (probably coinciding with faults), extending through the permafrost north of the Brooks Range. Some discharge is apt to
discharge along the northern boundary of the permafrost and the coast
Eastward, the springs and mountains are located closer to known. For example, Red Hill spring with a discharge of
the coast. This results in a general decreasing trend in the 24.1 l/s (Childers et al. 1977) has been measured at
general elevation of springs. temperatures ranging from 29 to 33 °C and Okpilak spring
(69°17.227′–144°1.063′) with even lower flow has been
measured at 38 °C. However, Fig. 3 shows that there are
Discharge from springs several springs near 0 °C with rather low flows that appear
The measured temperature of springs (Table 1, Fig. 3) to be able to maintain the required taliks. A plot of
ranges from 0 to 33 °C. There are a large number of discharge versus elevation (Fig. 4) shows no discernible
springs that have temperatures at or just above the pattern, but there is a tendency for spring elevation to
freezing point of water. Most of these springs are located decrease from west to east.
either on the west or east ends of the study area. When Collectively for all the springs citied in this study, the
sampling in the winter with snow on the ground, it is discharge is 20,000 l/s, which would require a groundwater
possible that the measurements are not made at the point recharge area of 3,150 km2. This calculation is based on
where the spring first emerges from the ground, but some annual precipitation in the Brooks Range of around 400 mm
distance downstream. In late spring during snowmelt or in (Kane et al. 2012) and a runoff coefficient of 0.5 for the north
the summer, it is possible that spring flow is also mixed side of the Brooks Range (Kane et al. 2000), which would
with summer precipitation/runoff both diluting and alter-
ing the quality and temperature of the spring water.
During ablation, mixing will reduce the temperature if it
is not already at 0 °C; during the summer, precipitation
could alter the spring water temperature either up or down.
While Fig. 3 shows the ranges of temperature and
discharge of springs, there is no relationship between the
two variables.
The flow rate (Table 1) from springs varies from high
(5,494 l/s, Ivishak Hillside spring No. 7) to low (24 l/s,
Red Hill spring No. 12). What is not known is how much
heat is required to keep the taliks open for the springs to
exist; the amount of advected heat will depend upon the
groundwater water temperature and the flow rate. A quick
rumination of this yields the conclusion that the amount of
advected energy needs to offset the heat conducted from Fig. 3 A plot of water temperature versus spring discharge;
the talik by the colder permafrost and this will depend Ivishak Hillside has the highest flow rate at 5,500 l/s (T=7.4 °C) and
upon the geometry of the talik which is presently not Red Hill has the highest temperature at 33 °C (Q=24 l/s)
Spring-water chemistry
The data presented here is a mix of data collected by the
USGS and the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Water and
Environmental Research Center (UAF/WERC). It is
assumed that the USGS followed their protocol for testing
back in the 1970s. In the measurements UAF/WERC
personnel made, the procedures outlined in APKA-
Fig. 4 Plot of elevation versus discharge for springs in northeast-
ern Alaska where detailed data have been collected AWWA-WEF (1998) were followed. Where both parties
collected the same data for a common site, the magnitude
of the measurements was quite similar. This indicated that
leave a maximum of 200 mm of potential recharge. This the data could be collectively used together and the
200-mm estimate of annual recharge is obviously conserva- properties had not significantly changed over the 25-year
tive as it does not include evapotranspiration. period between sampling campaigns.
The State of Alaska (2008) geological map shows that the The pH of the spring water ranged from a low of 6.4 to
areal coverage of surficial limestone is much greater (at least a high of 8.2 (Table 1). The low values (6.4–6.8) were
one-half of the eastern one-third of the Brooks Range) than found at both the east and west ends of the study area. The
the recharge area derived in the preceding paragraph. pH in the middle of the study area was above 7.0, with 16
Although potential recharge areas are widespread through of 22 values in the narrow range of 7.9–8.2. The pH
the whole of the Brooks Range, the distribution of surficial values found here are typical of groundwater in general.
limestone is greater, both on the south side of the Brooks Calcium levels (Table 2; Fig. 6) vary from 36 to 78 mg/
Range and east of the Dalton Highway. l for the springs with one outlier at 7.4 mg/l (Kuparuk,
spring No. 2). Calcium levels are generally low for
groundwater in igneous and metamorphic bedrock and
Specific conductivity high for carbonate sedimentary formations. With the
Specific conductivity was measured at all of the springs extensive limestone bedrock in the Brooks Range (State
(Table 1; Fig. 5) visited by personnel either from the of Alaska 2008), especially in the eastern sector, high
University of Alaska Fairbanks in the last decade or the levels of calcium should be expected if that is the pathway
USGS in the early 1970s. There was little difference between of the groundwater. As mentioned previously, the
similar measurements taken by the two organizations at the Kuparuk River spring (No. 2) has the low outlier value
same springs. The values ranged from a low of 210 μS/cm to of calcium; this spring has many features that separate it
a high of 1,000 μS/cm. Most of the measured values were in from the quality of most of the other springs. For example,
the high 200s. The high value of specific conductivity was at it has a low pH, temperature near 0 °C, and low
a hot spring (Red Hill, spring No. 12, Table 1) with a magnesium and potassium levels.
measured temperature of 33 °C. The ionic constituents that Magnesium levels (Table 2; Fig. 6) range from 0.7 to
increase specific conductivity of water are calcium, 21 mg/l. The springs in the middle of the study area have
the highest values with Red Hill (No. 12) at 21 mg/l and
Sadlerochit (No. 14) at 18 mg/l. About one-half of the
springs are in the 7–9 mg/l range. Sodium levels are
generally low (0.3–2.8 mg/l) except for the same two
springs, Red Hill (120 mg/l) and Sadlerochit (7.8 mg/l).
These two springs are also warmer than the other springs
that were analyzed in detail; the higher sodium and
temperature values are likely a result of deeper ground-
water flow. Potassium, which is not very soluble, ranges
from 0.1 to 5.8 mg/l, with Red Hill the highest.
Sadlerochit spring has the highest chloride level at
4.0 mg/l, while most of the remaining springs are below
1.0 mg/l.
Groundwater with high bicarbonate levels are generally
Fig. 5 Relationship between specific conductivity and spring an indication of limestone or dolomite bedrock. Bicar-
temperature showing an increase in specific conductivity with bonate levels (Table 2; Figs. 6 and 7) of the springs ranged
temperature from 62 to 322 mg/l with an average of 146 mg/l. The hot
spring (Red Hill, No. 12) had the highest and the compared with the other springs. Alkalinity was measured
Kongakut River above the delta (No. 20) had the lowest. at several springs; most alkalinity (capacity to neutralize
The lowest value of calcium (Table 2) was at the acids) is due to carbonate and bicarbonate. Figure 8 shows
Kuparuk River aufeis (spring No. 2) at 7.4 mg/l, which the strong relationship between specific conductivity and
compares to the area average for all springs of around alkalinity.
50 mg/l. Sulfate was the major contributor to the specific
conductivity at this site. Sadlerochit (spring No. 14) has
the highest concentration of calcium at 78 mg/l (Table 2) Radiocarbon dating
and the second highest specific conductivity of 410 μS/ A few samples of spring water were collected for
cm. Except for the two hot springs, Red Hill and Okpilak, radiocarbon dating. There are many possible sources of
Sadlerochit is the warmest spring at 13 °C with a flow of error when performing 14C dating of groundwater; the
approximately 1,000 l/s. Red Hill, with the highest three major sources of error are: (1) the 14C level of
specific conductivity (Table 2), has average Ca levels atmospheric CO2 is not constant, (2) recharge entering the
(55 mg/l) and high levels of magnesium (21 mg/l), sodium groundwater system may mix with other water of different
(120 mg/l), potassium (5.8 mg/l) and sulfate (150 mg/l) ages, and (3) carbon from other sources (some much older
Fig. 6 A plot of spring-water chemistry for data collected by the USGS (Childers et al. 1977) and UAF/WERC. Some data is absent in
cases where there were no measurements; also note the log scale on the y-axis
Discussion
Interest in potential groundwater flow on the North Slope
of Alaska for this study resulted from various field
observations during a number of related hydrologic
research projects. UAF/WERC hydrologic investigations
concentrated on active layer and surficial hydrological
processes (Kane et al. 1989, 2000; McNamara et al.
1998). There are, however, two aufeis deposits in the
Kuparuk watershed that were of interest; why were they
there and what was the origin of the water that allowed
them to form? There also existed several USGS open file
Fig. 8 Plot of alkalinity versus specific conductivity of springs in
northeastern Alaska. The data plotted here are a mix of some of the reports about aufeis deposits in more remote areas (away
springs in Table 1 and new springs (like Okpilak) that had not been from the road system) of the North Slope. It was not until
sampled before the last decade that UAF/WERC personnel were able to
get helicopter support for their research projects and could This 591 mm would be the equivalent groundwater recharge
visit some of these more remote sites. Individually, the required above the spring in the watershed to produce the
springs may not seem very significant hydrologically, with spring discharge. Best estimate of annual precipitation
the largest spring discharging about 5,500 l/s (5.5 m3/s). measured over a 4-year period for this area by this study is
Collectively the 22 springs presented in Table 1 discharge about 400 mm (Kane et al. 2012). In an adjacent creek
over 20,000 l/s (20 m3/s). The significance of these (spring No. 6, Flood Creek, drainage area 207 km2), the
springs at the watershed scale can be better appreciated depth of hypothetical groundwater recharge over the basin
by the size of the aufeis formations that develops above the spring would be 233 mm in comparison again with
downstream at winter’s end (Sloan et al. 1976; Yoshikawa average annual precipitation around 400 mm. In addition to
et al. 2007). Aufeis is an important water-storage spring discharge, there is both surface runoff and evapo-
component in the winter months and influences the local transpiration from the watershed above the spring. It should
geomorphology and ecology. Sloan et al. (1976) reported be recalled that these watersheds also have extensive
that the larger aufeis formations generally developed at the permafrost that will further prevent recharge. These two
same locations each year, but the depth and areal coverage cases demonstrate that a significant amount of the ground-
varied from year-to-year. water recharge for these two springs has to originate outside
Clearly, some of these large springs discharge more water the watersheds from where the discharge occurs. The
annually than seems possible from a water-balance view- headwaters of these two watersheds border on the continen-
point at the watershed scale. In the Saviukviayak River tal divide, so the likely source (some may come from
tributary spring (spring No. 5, Table 1), the discharge was adjacent watersheds) for groundwater recharge is on the
measured at 1,529 l/s; assuming the discharge is constant south side of the continental divide in the Brooks Range.
over a period of 1 year (measurements show this to be One of the most extensive surficial rock formations in
generally true), this would be equivalent to a depth of the Brooks Range, especially on the south side of the
591 mm over the 83 km2 drainage area above the spring. divide, is limestone, conglomerate, shale, and dolomite
Fig. 10 Plot of deuterium (δD or hydrogen (δ2H)) versus oxygen (δ18O) isotopes of spring runoff in northern and central Alaska. Spring
water samples (blue circles) are similar to values for the central or southern parts of the Brooks Range. Water samples north of the
continental divide in the Brooks Range (green squares) are lighter than spring water in the same area