BK0131 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine Type Stimulants ATS and O

PERPUSTAKAAN BNN r
TGL OITERIMA
No INDUK
No I<OOE BUKU 6•1. $ I rAv. I f
SUM BER
~~--
HARGA BUKU
PARAF PETUGAS
a\ Pe rpu stakaa n B NN
\::;1 112 0100113 6
Compiled and written by:
Prof. Paulina G. Padmoboedojo, MA, MPH

Expert Consultant, National Narcotics Board
National Coordinator, UNODC Project Improving AT.S' Data and
Information Systems (ADIRAS/01197)
PATmiiNS AND 'IRENDS OF
AMPIIm'AMINE-'IYPI) mMIJI.ANIS fA'n)
AND O'IHER DRIJGS OF AIIIJSE
IN INDONESIA. 1008
A Report from Project: ADIRAS/Ol/F97

Improving ATS Data and information Systems
August,2007
National Narcotics Board, Indonesia

and
Unkecl Nations Ofllce on Drup and Cttme (UNODC)
RePonal Centre for Asia and the Padftc
) '\ll) II 'V : ....,_..<.,.,...

iPERPUSJAkAA~ e ,_.~
CAY'IANG - JAKARTA Tl \11\u~
I'ORIEWORD
Amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) trafficking and abuse have increased

significantly in East Asia and the Pacific, including Indonesia. Illicit production,
trafficking, and abuse have been observed in recent years, but national responses to
face these challenges have been limited due to inadequate data and infonnation
system to understand the scope and magnitude and the patterns of ATS problem in
the region.
In an attempt to deal with the rapid rise in Amphetamine-type Stimulants

(ATS) abuse and to deal with the limitations of national drug infonnation systems, a
regional project ADIRAS/OI/F97: Improving ATS Data and Information Systems was
established in 2002 by the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific
aimed to develop infrastructure for better understanding of ATS-related issues in the
region and for exchanging data relevant to ATS abuse prevention and control.
Indonesia is one of the participating countries of the ATS project together with
Cambodia, China, Lao PRD, Myanmar, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.
Since 2004, the project in Indonesia has been able to document the scope and
magnitude of the ATS abuse, production aod trafficking, monitor changes in patterns
and trends and share this information with related government and non-government
organizations, regional countries as well as with regional and international agencies.
This 2006 ATS and other drugs of abuse data and information report is the
second annual ATS project publication. It includes 2006 reports of ATS and other
drugs of abuse related arrests, seizures, and abuse, collected from 33 provinces
throughout Indonesia aod compiled, processed and aoalyzed by the Department of
Research and Information of the National Narcotics Board. This report also includes
infonnation provided in the earlier reports for comparative analysis. Results of this
report have been used for programme planning and policy development.
Indonesia through the National Narcotics Boards (BNN) is one of the

participating countries in the "Improving ATS Data and Information Systems"
project. which is managed by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific. The National Narcotics Board
through its Research and Information Department. is responsible for monitoring drug
abuse patterns and trends in Indonesia and for disseminating the most current
information on those patterns and trends.
Grateful appreciation is expressed to the Indonesian National Police,
Provincial Police (POLDA), and BNN's Directorate of Drugs, for collecting,
processing, compiling and reporting the law enforcement data requested. Our
sincerest gratitude also goes and to the 96 drug abuse treatment institutions (RSKO,
general hospitals, mental hospitals, NGO rehabilitation centers, and prisons) for
reporting their treatment data, and to the Ministry of Health for compiling,
processing analyzing these drug abuse data and for reporting these data to BNN.
This report is compiled and written by Professor Paulina G. Padmohoedojo,

MPH, Expert Consultant of the National Narcotics Board and simultaneously the
national Project Coordinator of UNODC "Improving ATS Data and Information
Systems assisted by Sumirat, Head of Informatics Division, Rismalina, Head of
Monitoring and Evaluating Sub Division, Widba, ATS Data Entry Staff, Mia
Garmiaty, ATS Data Collecting Staff, Bastara, ATS Data Operator.
Dn. Made Mangku Pastika

Executive--Director
National Narcotics Board, Indonesia
ii
EXE«JIJTIVE SIJMMARY
1. Drug Use 2006. The 2006 national survey of high school and university
students from 33 provinces indicated an increasing trend of drug use in
Indonesia. The estimated li fetime prevalence of drug use among high school
and university students was 8.3% and 5.3% in the past year. In 2003, the
lifetime prevalence of drug use among high school and university students was
5.8% and 3.9% in the past year. Estimates on the total number of high school
and university students who had used drugs in their lifetime was about 1.4 to
1.7 million students, while about 912,000 to 1.1 million students had used
drugs in the past year.
The national survey 2006 further indicates that the higher the educational
level, the higher the drug use prevalence. Among junior high school students,
the drug use prevalence was 6%, nine percent (9%) among senior high school
students and 12% among university students. Senior high students from private
schools (10%) and university students (12%) had higher drug use prevalence
than those from public high schools and religious schools.
Drug use among males (12%) was threefold higher than that of females (4%).
The survey also indicated that the higher the age group, the higher rate of drug
use. Age groupl5 had 6%. This increased to 14% among age group 20 years
and older.
Based on the 2005 national household survey among 11087 household
respondents and 3,008 boarding house respondents, the prevalence drug
use among boarding house residents was significantly higher (13. 1%) than the
household (2.8%). Some 0.9% of the household population reported having
used in the past year and 0.4 percent in the past month. Among the boarding
house population, 5.2 percent reported having used drugs in the past year and
2.1% in the past month .
2. Types of Drugs of Abuse, 2006. The six types of drugs commonly used by the
drug users are as follows: (I) analgesics (43%); (2) ganja (38%); (3) Magic
mushroom (Kecubung) (21%); (4) ecstasy (15%); (5) methamphetamine
(shabu) (13%) and (6) benzodiazepine (9%). The first three drugs were
common used by junior high school students whi le ganja, ecstasy and
methamphetamine were used by senior high and university students. Ganja,
ecstasy and methamphetamine were also found to be the most popular drugs
used in the cities than in the rural areas. Yaba and ketamine have recently
emerged in 2006 as new drugs used.
National household survey in 2005 showed ganja as the most commonly used
illicit drug. Eighty-five percent (85%) of the household population had ever
used it during their lifetime, while 24.9 percent had used it in the past year.
Ganja is followed by Ecstasy with 32.1 percent; methamphetamine (28.9%);
barbiturates (20.9 %); heroin (12.9%); and benzodiazepine (10.8%).
iii
3. Drug Abuse Treatment Data. Drug abuse treatment data in 2006 indicated a
decreasing trend of drug users admitted in treatment centers from 2003 to 2006,
with a decreased rate of 29%. In 2003, forty two (42) treatment facilities
reported 7,014 drug cases. In 2004,70 treatment facilities reported 8,903 cases,
and in 2006, about 73 treatment facilities reported 6,359 cases.
4. Demographic Data of Drug users in treatment centers. Drug users in

treatment centers were generally young adults, with ages ranging from 20 to 29
years. Majority (92%) were males; majority were senior high school students;
unemployed, and not married.
5. Type of Illicit Drugs Used by TIR Patients, 2003-2006. Heroin was the
primary drug of abuse (72%) among T/R patients in 2003, followed by cannabis
(9.9%), ATS (3.7%), alcohol (2.8%) and sedatives (2.2%). In 2004, similar
ranking of drugs of abuse was reported. While heroin remained the primary
drug of abuse in 2006, a significant decrease in the percentage of heroin users
admitted for treatment can be noted from 2003 to 2006.
ATS abusers admitted in treatment facilities on the other hand increased
significantly by 124% from 2003-2006. Polydrug users also increased
significantly. Benzodiazepine abused in 2006 was 6.2 percent of the cases.
6. Methods of using Drugs, 2006. Majority were injecting, followed by inhaling

the drug and swallowing. Majority were polydrug users. Majority were
injecting, followed by inhaling the drug and swallowing.
7. Injecting Drug Use. In 2006, the national survey on drug abuse among students
estimated that 2 out of I 000 high school/university students interviewed were
injecting drug users. Among those who had used drugs in their lifetime (about
1.4 million-1.7 million students had used drugs in their lifetime), about 2.4%
were IDUs. The higher the education, the higher the use of injecting drugs.
The three provinces with the highest number of Injecting Drug Users among
university students were Yogyakarta (16 per 1000); Metro Jakarta (IS per
1000); and Central Java (14 per 1000). Injecting Drug Use in the city was higher
in the city (2.2% per 1000) than in the rural area ( 1.7 per 1000) in all levels of
education.
iv
8. Drug arrests 2005-2006. For the past five years (200 1-2006), the number of
illicit drug related arrests in Indonesia had significantly increased by 542%.
From 2004 to 2006, the increase was 179% and from 2005 to 2006, there was
39% increase. No significant changes in the demographic data of drug arrestees
from 2004 to 2006, with arrestees predominantly males, Indonesian nationality,
above 30 years of age with senior high education and majority were employed.
The number of arrests among those employed increased significantly from 2002
to 2005 but a decrease in all types of occupation can be noted in 2006. The
number of arrests working in private companies decreased by 47% from 2004 to
2005 and 35% decreased in 2006. Arrestees from manual/unskilled labors
increased from 29% in 2005 to 36% in 2006. Also noted is the dramatic
increased (192%) of arrests among the unemployed from 2002 to 2005 and
decreased slightly in 2006.
9. Illicit drug related arrests, by type of drugs, 2004-2006. From 2004 to 2006,
ganja consistently had the highest number of arrests, followed by
methamphetamine, heroin and ecstasy. The number of arrests relating to ganja
increased significantly by 122% from 2004 to 2006. Arrests related to heroin
remained stable. Total number of arrests related to ATS from 2004 to 2006 had
been relatively stable although a 31% increased fro m 2004 to 2005 occurred and
a 21% decreased in 2006. Other psychotropic drugs (G-List) have been stable
since 2004.
10. Illicit drug related arrest, by province, 2004-2006. Overall, the ten provinces
reporting the most number of illicit drug related arrest in 2004 to 2006 are as
follows: (I) Metropolitan Jakarta, (2) North Sumatra, (3) East Java, (4) Central
Java, (5) West Java, (6) Bali; (7) Riau; (8) East Kalimantan; (9) South
Kalimantan; and (10) Yogyakarta. In 2005, significant increased in the number
of illicit drug arrests was noted in these provinces with Metropolitan Jakarta
having 6538 total arrests followed by Central Java (2592); East Java (2473);
North Sumatra (2308); Riau (628); NTB (555); Bali (505); East Kalimantan
(391); and South Kalimantan (354). In 2006, significant increased of arrests
were reported in 3 provinces: Metropolitan Jakarta with 15% increase of arrests;
North Sumatra with 143% increased, and West Java with 83% increased.
Significant decrease of arrests can be noted in Central Java in 2006 with 326%;
Riau (234%) and East Java (35%).
II. Ecstasy Related Arrests, by Province and by Type of Drug Offense. Metro
Jakarta had the most number of ecstasy related arrests in the areas of ecstasy
production, distribution or drug dealing and consumption in 2005 and 2006.
Metro Jakarta is followed by North Sumatra, East Java, South Kalimantan and
Lampung. West Kalimantan; East Kalimantan , and Bangka Belitung newly
emerged with increased ecstasy related arrests in 2006.
12. Methamphetamine Related Arrests, by Province and by Type of Drug
Offense. Unlike ecstasy, no clandestine/kitchen laboratory in the production of
methamphetamine was found in 2005 and 2006. The provinces with most
number of methamphetamine related arrests (production, distribution and
consumption) in 2005 and 2006 were relatively the same as with ecstasy arrests
with slight change in the ranking. Metro Jakarta ranked first with the most
number of methamphetamine related arrests (distribution or drug dealing and
consumption) in 2005 and 2006, followed by East Java, Nort~ Sumatra, South
Kalimantan, Central Java, Riau, Bali, East Kalimantan West J~va and South
Sulawesi. While ecstasy related arrests in South Su lawesi had beOO stable since
2004, the number of shabu related arrests in this province increased more than
tenfo ld (1157%)in 2006. Bangka Belitung also experienced significant
increased (100%) related to methamphetamine (shabu) arrests with 7 arrests in
2004 to 14 in 2006. A number of provinces which had few or no arrests in the
past had emerged having ATS (ecstasy and methamphetamine) problem in
recent years as evidently indicated by the number of ATS related arrests in
Table 7 as follows: (I) East Nusa Tenggara; (2) Papua; (3) Banten; (4) Maluku;
(5) North Sulawesi; (6) Gorontalo; (7) North Sulawesi; (8) Aceh; (9) Kep. Riau
(Batam); and (10) Southeast Sulawesi.
13. Ganja Related Arrests, 2005-2006. The number of arrestees due to ganja
cultivation increased significantly (62%) from 2005 to 2006. Ganja production
is generally found in the island of Sumatra with North Sumatra having the most
number of ganja related arrests in 2005 followed by Aceh, South Sumatra, West
Sumatra and Jambi. In 2006, Aceh ranked first with the most number of
arrestees due to illicit ganja production with North Sumatra second, followed by
Jambi. Arrests due to illicit ganja dealing/trafficking increased by ,l 2% from
2005 to 2006. Metro Jakarta had the most number of arrestees ia' 2005 and
2006, followed by North Sumatra, Riau, West Java, Aceh, East, 'Java, West
Sumatra, Larnpung, Central Java, Bali and Yogyakarta in 2005.
In 2006, North Sumatra remained second to Metro Jakarta followed by West
Java, West Sumatra, East Java, Central Java, Riau, Jambi, Yogyakarta and
Larnpung .. Metro Jakarta remained the province with the most number of ganja
users arrested from a total of 1429 in 2005 to 2373 ganja arrestees in 2006,
followed North Sumatra, West Java, West Sumatra, Yogyakarta, East Java,
Central Java, Jambi, Bali and Lampung. It is interesting to note that Aceh
which had the highest arrestees due to illicit ganja cultivation offense in 2006
had relatively low number of arrested ganja users.
14. Arrests due to heroin trafficking/dealing a nd consumption in 2005 and 2006

were generally high on the is land of Java and Bali. Metro-Jakarta ranked first
with the most number of arrestees due to heroin trafficking/dealing and use,
followed by North Sumatra, Bali, East Java, West Java, Yogyakarta and South
Sulawesi.
vi
15. Seizures of Illicit Drugs, 2000-2006. The amount of illicit drugs seized from
2005 to 2006 was generally stable except for ecstasy and methamphetamine
which increased by 37% and 23% respectively.
16. Ganja seizure in 2005 increased significantly (169%) from 8,493.5 kg in 2004
to 22,835.7 kg in 2005 and decreased by 51% in 2006.
17. Ganja Seizures. In 2004, there was a total seizure of 113.7 hectares on ganja
cultivation, 8,493.5 kg of dried ganja leaves and 214,914 ganja plants. In
2005, the area seized decreased to 62.33 hectares but increased to 289.64
hectares in 2006. Aceh consistently ranked having the largest area for ganja
cultivation with 162,387 in 2005 to 949,114 plants in 2006, followed by North
Sumatra and Bengkulu.
18. Methamphetamine seizures. Total methamphetamine seizure indicated an

eight-fold increased (834%) from 27,837.26 gr. in 2004 to 260,164.35 grin
2005. From 2005 to 2006, there was a three-fold increased (376%).
19. Methamphetamine Seizures by Province. Metropolitan Jakarta consistently

had the largest seizures of methamphetamine with 6,585.192 gr. in 2004 to
74,505.06 gr. in 2005 with an increase of99%, and a seizure of 1,188,510.7 gr.
in 2006 with almost fifteen-fold increased (1 ,495%). East Java ranked second
with 2,852.868 grin 2004 to 19,114.74 grin 2006; followed by North Sumatra
from 3,919.13 gr. in 2004 to 30, I 07 grin 2006.
20. Ecstasy seizures 2005-2006. An increasing trend in ecstasy seizures from

2002 to 2006 is noted. In 2004, a total of 242,196 ecstasy tablets were seized. In
2005, the total number of ecstasy tablets seized was relatively the same as in
2004 but increased significantly (85%) in 2006 with 463,550.30 tablets seized.
From 2005 to 2006, ecstasy seizure increased by 37%. Metropolitan Jakarta has
remained having the largest amount of ecstasy tablet seizures since 2004,
followed by East Java, North Sumatra, Bali, East Kalimantan, South
Kalimantan , West Kalimantan, South Sumatra and Lampung. Clandestine
laboratories and production equipment were found in 4 provinces in 2005 :
North Sumatra, South Sulawesi, South Kalimantan and East Java. In 2006,
clandestine laboratories were seized in 12 : North Sumatra, Lampung, Metro
Jakarta, East Java, South Kalimantan, Bangka Belitung and Ban ten.
21. Other psychotropic drugs (G-List). Seizures of other psychotropic drugs (G-
List) increased significantly (117%) from 2004 to 2005 and decreased
significantly by 63% in 2006. Metro-Jakarta had the highest seizure of G-List
drugs in 2005, followed by Central Java, East Java, East Kalimantan (ranked
first in 2004) and South Kalimantan.
vii
22. Heroin and Cocaine Seizures, 2004-2006. The presence of heroin in
Indonesia had been stable since 2000 to 2006. Cocaine seizures had a
fluctuating trend since 2000 indicating a large increase in seizures in 200 I, a
very dramatic decreased in 2002. a significant increased in 2003 and significant
decreased in 2004 and continued decrease in seizures in 2005 and 2006.
viii
TARt~ 01' (}ONDWJS
Page
Foreword ........................................ ........ .............. .....................

Executive Summary ... ... . .... .... .... ... . ... . .. . ... ... . .... ... . ... ..... .... ... ... . . .. . . iii
Table of Contents ....................................... .................................. ix
List of Tablea ..................................................................... ......... x
List of Figura . ..... ... . . ....... ........ . ... ... .... ... . ... .... ... . ... . .... ... . . .. . ... ... ... xii
Introduction .................................................................. .......... ...

Background ................... .............. .. .. ... .. . .. .................. .... ... .. .. .... ...
Method ... ... .. . ... .. ... .... ... ... .. ... ... .... ... ... .. .. ... .. .. ...........••........... .......
Patterns and Trends of Drug Abuse in Indonesia, 2006 ••• •••. . . •• . ••• ••• . ••• . ••. 4
Type of Drugs Abused, 2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Pen:entage Reporting Illicit Drug Use, Based on Household Survey 2005 . . .. . ... 1
Drug Abuse Treaunent Data, 2003-2006 ... . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . ... 9
Type of Illicit Drugs Used by TIR Patients, 2003-2006 .. ... .... .. .. .... .... ... .. . .. . 10
Demographic Data of Drug Abusers in Treaunent Centers, 2006 . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . II
Types of Drug Used by Drug Abuse TIR Patients, 2006 ...... .. . ... ... ... .. . .. .. .. .. 13
Injeeting Drug Use 2006 ...................................................... ........... 14
Drug Related Arrest., 2001-2006 ...... ................................................ 14

Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia, 2000-2006 .... ...... .... •........ .... ...... 21
Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Type of Drugs, 2004-2006 ...... ... . .. .•....... ...... 22
tnicit Drug Related Arrest, by Province, 2004-2006 . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .••. .. . . . . . . . .••.. 23
Ecstasy Related Arrests, by Province and by Type
of Drug Offense, 2005-2006 . . .. . . ... ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . 25
Methamphetamine Related Arrests, by Province and by Type
of Drug Offense, 2005-2006 ... ... .. .. ..... ..... .................. ................ .... .. 27
Ganja related arrests, 2005-2006 .. .. ... .. .. .............................. , . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 30
Seizures of Illicit Drugs, 2000-2006 ... ... ............................................. 33

Ganja seizures, 2000-2006 . . . . . . ... . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . ... ... . .. . . . .. . .. . . ... . . . . . .. . ... .•. 33
Methamphetamine seizures 2000-2006 ... .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . .. . . .•• . ... ... . .. . .•. . .. 35
Ecstasy seizures 2005-2006 ... . .. . . . .. . ... ... . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ... .•• . . . . . . ... . .. . . .. . .. . .... 36
Seizures of other psychotropic drugs (G-List) . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . ... ... . . . •. . .. . . .. . .. . .... 37
Heroin and cocaine Seizures, 2000-2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 39
List of Ananea .. .... ............. .... ....... ...... .. .. .................... ... .. ....... .. .. 40
ix
List of Tables
Page
Table I. Drug Abuse Prevalence Among Indonesian High School and

University Students in their Lifetime and in Past Year,
by Educational Levels, 2006 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 4
Table 2. Estimated Total Number of Drug Abusers Among High School

and University Students, by Educational Levels, 2006 .. .......... ..
Table 3. Types of Drugs Abused in Past Year, 2006 .... .. .................... .
Table 4. Drug Abuse Prevalence by Individnals in their Lifetime,

The Past Year, and the Past Month, by Household (City and
Village) and Boarding House, and Gender .. ........................ ..
Table 5. Percentage Reporting Use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia

Among Household Population, and Boarding House
Population, Aged 10-60: Lifetime and Past Year
prevalence, 2005 ...... ... .. .............. .... .... ..... ................... .
Table 6A. Total Number of Drug Users in Indonesia from Drug Treatment
and Rehabilitation Facilities, Based on Drug of Abuse, 2006 ......
Table 68. Drug Abuse Treatment & Rehabilitation Data Per province
and Per type of Drugs of Abuse, 2006 .. .. .. ................................... 9
Table 7. Distribution of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Occupation 2000-2006 ....................................... 21
Table 8. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Type of Drug Seized, 2004-2006 ................................... 22
Table 9. Top Ranking Provinces in Indonesia with the Most Number of

Ecstasy Related Arrests, by Type of Drug Offense, 2005 and
2006 ................ ........................................ 25
Table I 0. Total Number of Ecstasy Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Type of Drug Offense, by Province, 2004-2006 26
X
Table II. Top Ranking Provinces in Indonesia with the most Number of
Methamphetamine Related Arrests, by Type of Drug Offense,
2005 , 2006 .. 27
Table 12. Total Number of Methamphetamine (Shabu) Related Arrests

in Indonesia, by Type of Arrest, by Province, 2004-2006 . 28
Table 13. Tota l Number of ATS & other Psychotropic Drugs Re lated
Arrests in Indonesia, by Province, 2004-2006 . 29
Table 14. Total Number of Cannabis (Ganja) Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Type of Arrest, by Province, 2005-2006 . 31
Table 15. Total Number of Heroin Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Type of Arrest, by Province, 2004-2006 . 32
Table 16. Seizures of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia, 2000-2006 33
Table 17. Seizures of Ganja, ATS and Psychotropic Drugs,

by Province, 2005-2006 . 35
xi
TA.BI..~ 01' (JONftNfS fC"IIIIIIuedJ
List of Figures
Page
Figure I. Lifetime Prevalence use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia

Among Household Popu lation, and Boarding House
population, aged I 0-60, 2005 .............. .. ..
Figure 2. Type of Drugs Used, 2003-2006 . 10
Figure 3. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Age Group, 2006. II
Figure 4. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Gender, 2006 . II
Figure 5. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Education Attainment, 2006. 12
Figure 6. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Employment, 2006 . 12
Figure 7. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Marital Status, 2006 12
Figure 8. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Admission status, 2006 . 13
Figure 9. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Type of Drugs used, 2006. 13
Figure 10. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Methods of Drug Use, 2006 . 13
Figure II. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrestees in Indonesia,

2001-2006. 14
Figure 12. Total Number of Drug Arrest, by Gender, 2000-2006 . 15
Figure 12-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia

by Gender, 2005 . 15
Figure 12-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia

by Gender, 2006 . . 15
Figure 13. Total Number of Drug Arrest, by Gender, 2000-2006. 16
Figure 14. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Nationality, 2005 -2006. 16
xii
Figure 15. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,
by Nationality, 2000-2006 . 17
Figure 16. Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Age Group, 2000-2006 . 17
Figure 17-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Arrest, by Age, 2005 . .. 18
Figure 17-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Arrest, by Age , 2006 . 18
Figure 18. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrestees in Indonesia,

by Education, 2000-2006 . 18
Figure 19-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Education, 2005 . 19
Figure 19-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Education, 2006 . 19
Figure 20-A. Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Occupation, 2005 19
Figure 20-B. Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Occupation, 2006 19
Figure 21 -A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests among

the Employed in Indonesia, by Occupation, 2005 . 20
Figure 21-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests among

the Employed in Indonesia, by Occupation, 2006 .. 20
Figure 22. Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,

by Type of Drug Seized, 2000-2006 . 21
Figure 23-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Type

of Drugs, 2004 . 23
Figure 23-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Type

of Drugs, 2005 . 23
Figure 23-C. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Type

of Drugs, 2006 . 23
Figure 24. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Province, 2004-2006 .... 24
xiii
Figure 25. Seizures of Ganja in Indonesia, 2000-2006 ................ ..• .. 34
Figure 26. Cannabis Seizures in Indonesia, 2006 34
Figure 27. Seizures of Shabu in Indonesia, 2000-2006, in Kg 35
Figure 28. Methamphetamine Crystal Seizures in Indonesia, 2006 . 36
Figure 29. Seizures of Ecstasy in Indonesia, 2000-2006 . 37
Figure 30. Ecstasy Seizures in Indonesia, 2006 . 37
Figure 31 Seizures ofG-List Drugs in Indonesia, 2000-2006. 38
Figure 32. G-List Seizures in Indonesia, 2006. 38
Figure 33. Seizures of Heroin and Cocaine in Indonesia, 2000-2006 . 39
Figure 34. Heroin Seizures in Indonesia, 2006 . 39
xiv
TABtl) OJ' (]ONTIJNIN ((),nJ/nuedJ
List of Annexes
Page
Annex 1. List of Provincial Narcotics Board .................... ... .. . 40
Annex 2. Drug Abuse Record Form (Indonesia) 41
Annex 3. Drug Abuse Report Form (Annual)······················ ~ ·· 42
Annex 4. Drug Abuse Treatment Data Sources 2003-2006 44
Annex 5. List of Provincial Police Office (Polda) ..... . . .. . .. ..... .. . . 48
Annex 6. Law Enforcement Standard Recording Form .................. . •.. 49
Annex 7. Law Enforcement Data Reporting Form ...................... ..• .. 50
Annex 8. National Household Survey of Illicit Drug Use and

Trafficking in Indonesia, 2005 . 51
Annex 9. List of Provinces Reporting Drug Abuse Treatment and

Rehabilitation Data 2003-2006 . 64
XV
INI'RODIJCDON
Background
The rising trend of illicit drug abuse and trafficking continue to affect most
parts of the world causing social, economic and behavioral problems. Indonesia is no
exception. Over the years, Indonesia, like many other countries in the region, has
been confronted with illicit drug abuse, production and trafficking. While
comprehensive drug abuse data was not available until 2003, records and reports
during the decades up to the mid-1990s indicate that the major drugs of abuse were
cannabis (ganja) and benzodiazepines, along with alcohol. Poly-drug abuse was
common. Since the late-1990s, both drug production and abuse in Indonesia has
increased significantly and has become one of the major concerns of the government.
Large seizures of cannabis continued to rise and of increasing concern is the growing
production of synthetic drugs, specificall y ecstasy and methamphetami ne (shabu) as
evidently shown by the seizures of large clandestine laboratories. Abuse of
Amphetamine-type stimulants like ecstasy and methamphetamine also has become a
major concern to public health since their emergence in the late 1990s.
UNODC Project "Improving ATS Data & Information Systems".
In an attempt to deal with the rapid rise in Amphetamine-type Stimulants

(A TS) abuse and to deal with the limitations of national drug informat ion systems, a
regional project ADIRAS/Ol/F97: Improving ATS Data and Information Systems was
establi shed in 2002 by the UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the Pacific
aimed to develop infrastructure for better understanding of ATS-related issues in the
region and for exchanging data relevant to ATS abuse prevention and control.
In 2002, a meeting was convened for project ADIRAS/01 / F97: Improving

ATS Data and Information Systems attended by six ASEAN countries (Cambodia,
Laos, Philippines, Vietnam , Myarunar and Thailand) plus China. Indonesia attended
as observer. On August 20, 2003, UNODC Regional Centre for East Asia and the
Pacific convened the first annual Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Meeting for
project ADIRAS/0 1/F97. This time, BNN Indonesia was added as an official
participant of the project.
Method of ATS and other Drugs Collection and Reporting
Since 2003, the Data and Information Center (Pusdatin) of the Ministry of
Health has been responsible for monitoring the drug abuse patterns and trends. It
collects drug abuse data from various health and social institutions such as general
hospitals, mental hospitals, public health centers, municipal/city health offices,
prisons and drug treatment and rehabilitation centers throughout Indonesia using the
drug abuse standard recording form developed by BNN and the Ministry of Health
(MOH) in 2003. The 2003 revised drug abuse standard recording form (Annex 2)
includes patient registration number, gender, age, education, occupation, civil status,
drug/s abuse, methods of abuse, age of patient first took drugs, source/s of drugs, and
status of discharge (treated, referred, or passed away).
The form together with the instruction on how to complete the form, were
distributed to relevant institutions throughout Indonesia, identified as existing ATS
information sources and contacts as a base for national information network on drug
abuse.
A drug abuse report form (Annex 3) was also formulated which includes:
total number of drug users, by gender: male and female; by age group; by
occupation; by educational attainment; type of drugs used; methods of use; and
number of mortality. Data compilation, processing, analysis, and documentation are
routinely undertaken by the Ministry of Health, and findings are shared with BNN
and its related members, including NGOs.
In 2003, out of 94 institutions as drug abuse data sources, 44 institutions

responded and 71 institutions in 2004 (Annex 4). In 2005, increased provincial
autonomy severely affected and complicated MOH data collection management,
limiting its scope of action to strengthen the data collection networks. With this
constraint, BNN attempted to take over and continue to collect drug abuse data, this
time through the Provincial Narcotics Board (Annex I), but with limited results. In
2006, the Ministry of Health and the BNN attempted to work together collecting
drug abuse data. Seventy-three (73) institutions reported.
Since 2003, five national surveys have been conducted to determine the
prevalence of drug abuse in Indonesia. Three of the national surveys conducted in
2003, 2004 and 2006 aimed to determine the drug use prevalence among high school
and university students. Also in 2003, a special survey on drug use among prison
inmates was also conducted. In 2005, a national household survey was conducted for
the first time in 33 provinces which also includes special population (boarding
houses' residents) to determine the prevalence of drug use among the general
population in Indonesia.
The law enforcement data bas been regularly undertaken by the Provincial
Police Office (Annex 5) every month since 2000. Overall, the law enforcement
standardized recording form (Annex 6) includes total number of illicit drug related
arrests, type of arrest (drug user, dealer, trafficker, producer), gender, nationality,
age, occupation, seizures (amount seized). Data from the provincial police is then
sent to BNN through a reporting form (Annex 7) for recapitulation, data processing,
analysis and reporting.
Areu or data coUedioo across 33 Provincial Narcotia Board (BNP)

in Indonesia as of 2006
PATDJRNS AND 'IRIJNDS OJ' A'fS AND
01111JR DRIJGS IN INDONIJSIA. 2006
Patterns and Trends of Drug Abuse in Indonesia, 2006
Prevalence of Drug Use among Indonesian Students.
The 2006 national survey of high school and university students from 33
provinces indicated an increasing trend of drug use in Indonesia. The estimated
lifetime (having ever used illicit drugs) prevalence of drug use among high school
and university students was 8.3% and 5.3% in the past year (Table 1). In 2003, the
lifetime prevalence of drug use among high school and university students was 5.8%
and 3.9% in the past year.
Table 1. Prevalence of Drug Use among Indonesian High School and University
Students in their Lifetime and in Past Year, by Educational Levels, 2006
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2006
Estimates on the total nwnber of high school and university students who had
used drugs in their lifetime was about 1.4 to 1.7 million students, while about
912,000 to 1.1 million students had used drugs in the past year (Table 2).
Table 2. Estimated Total Number of Drug Abusers Among High School and
University Students, by Educational Levels, 2006
Junior Senior
Academy/
Educational Level High High Total
Faculty
Scbool Scbool
Total Number 9,681,802 6 11,385 3 585,728 19,578,915
Lifetime Prevalence
Minimum 540,245 499,862 380,804 1,420,911
Maximum 660 299 610,942 465,427 1,736,668
Past Year Prevalence
Minimum 374,686 340,815 196,856 912,257
Maximum 457,949 416,551 240,602 1,115,103
The national survey 2006 further indicates that the higher the educational
level, the higher the drug use prevalence. Among junior high school students, the
drug use prevalence was 6%, nine percent (9%) among senior high school students
and 12% among university students. Senior high students from private schoo ls (10%)
and university students ( 12%) had hi gher drug use prevalence than those from public
high schoo ls and religious schools.
Drug use among males (12%) was threefold higher than that of females (4%).
The survey also indicated that the higher the age group, the higher rate of drug use.
Age groupl5 had 6%. This increased to 14% among age group 20 years and older.
Types of Drugs Abused, 2006

Based on the 2006 national survey, there were six types of drugs commonly
used by the drug users namely: (I) analgesics (42.1%); (2) ganja (36.9%); (3) Magic
mushroom (Kecubung) (2 1.8%); (4) ecstasy (14.3%); (5) methamphetamine (shabu)
(12.2%), (6) benzodiazepine (8%), and heroin (7.5%) (Table 3). Ganja, ecstasy and
methamphetamine were found to be the most popular drugs in the cities than in the
rural areas.
Table 3. Types of Drugs Abused in Past Year,2006
Junior Senior Academy/

Types of Drugs Total
HS HS Univenity
N= 1289 I 740 904 3 933
Analgesics 49.7 41,6 32.4 42.1
Mae:ic mushroom Kecubung) 30.8 19.6 13.4 21,8
Barbiturates 7.1 6.0 6.9 6.5
Gan·a 18.1 42.3 55.2 36.9
Benzodiazepine 7.4 8.6 7.7 8.0
Methamphetamine shabu 9.2 12.1 16.7 12.2
Ecstasy 9.5 15.4 19.2 14.3
Heroin 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.5
Morphine 7.6 6.3 5.0 6.4
Cocaine 7.0 5.3 4.8 5.7
Source. Nat10nal NarcotiCS Board (BNN), 2006
Based on the 2005 national household survey among II 087 household
respondents and 3,008 boarding house respondents, the lifetime prevalence drug use
among boarding house residents was significantly higher (13.1 %) than the household
(2.8%). Some 0.9% of the household population reported having used in the past
year and 0.4 percent in the past month. Among the boarding house population, 5.2
percent reported having used drugs in the past year and 2.1% in the past month
(Table 4). The drug use prevalence among males was significantly much higher
(4.6%) compared to females (0.4%). The prevalence of drug use of household
population in the city reporting having ever used illicit drugs was higher (2.8%) than
in the village (1.3%).
Table 4. Drug Abuse Prevalence by Individuals in Tbeir Lifetimes,
tbe Past Year, and Past Montb, by Household Population (City and Village)
and Boarding House, and Gender
Prevaleaee Lifetime Put Year Past moatb

M F M&F M F M&F M F M&F
Household 5.4 0.5 2.8 1.6 0.2 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.4
(c;ty)
I iN=7959l
House hold 2.6 0.2 1.3 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4
(Village)
I <N=3128l
Boarding 18.1 7.3 13.1 6.4 3.9 5.2 2.9 1.2 2.1
House
I (N= 3008)
Age group 20-29 had the highest prevalence of illicit drug use for both
members of the household population and boarding house rCsidents.
The household survey 2005 also indicated that Pontianak in West

Kalimantan had the highest prevalence rate of illicit drug use in a lifetime (29.7%),
followed by Yogyakarta (14%), Metro Jakarta (12%), Medan, North Sumatra
(8.6%), Surabaya, East Java (7.6%) and Makassar, South Sulawesi (6.8%)
Among all members of the household population, both in city and village,
males were significantly more likely than females to have ever used illicit drugs
(5.4% in the city and 2.6% in the vi llage), to have used illicit drugs in the past year
(1.6% and 1.0% respecti ve ly
City residents were generally more likely than residents in the villages or
rural areas to have ever used illicit drugs (2.8%) or to have used it in the past year
(0.9%) or past month (0.4%). Jakarta had the highest prevalence of illicit drug use for
lifetime (6.0%), followed by Medan (5.7%), Bandung (4.8%), Yogyakarta (4.3%),
Pontianak (3.6%), Semarang (3.5%), Denpasar (2.9%), Pekanbaru (2.2%) and 2.1%
for Surabaya and Jambi.
Percentage of vi llage residents who had ever used illicit drugs was 1.3%, had
used drugs in the past year (0.5%) or in the past (0.4%). However, Deli Serdang, a
rural area in North Sumatra reported 5.0% of illicit drug use for lifetime, some 2.4
percent in the past year and some 1.8 percent in past month.
Percentage Reporting Dlicit Drug Use, based on Household Survey,
2005
Based on the 2005 Household survey, ganja was the most commonly used
illicit drug. Ganja was used by 85% percent of members of the household
population in their lifetimes and 24.9 percent in the past year. Among boarding bouse
population, 83.9 percent bad ever used ganja in their lifetime and 28.6 percent in the
past. Some 23.1 percent of boarding bouse residents bad used ecstasy in their
lifetimes and 37.1 percent in the past year, which indicates an increased used of
ecstasy in the past year.
Methamphetamine was reported by some 28.9 percent of members of the

household population in their lifetimes and 8.8 percent in the past year while 26.6
percent of the boarding house population had ever used methamphetamine in their
lifetimes and 24.5% in the past year.
Barbiturate was used by some 20.9 percent in their lifetimes and 2.8 percent
in the past year. Some 12.9 percent bad used heroin in their lifetimes and 6.0 percent
in the past year. Some 10.8 percent had ever used benzodiazepine in their lifetime
and 1.2 percent in the past year. Use of other drugs was less common and these other
illicit drugs were used by less than 2 percent of the household population in the past
year (Figure Iffable 5).
Figure l. Lifetime Prevalence Use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia Among

Household Population and Boarding House Population, Aged 10-60,2005
Table 5. Percentage Reporting Use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia Among
Household Population, and Boarding House Population, Aged 10-60: 2005
Lifetime and Past Year Prevalence
Boarding
City Village Household
House
N 212 37 249 384
Types of Dru2s ever used 2
Metbampbetime (Shabu) 30.2 21.6 28.90 26.6
MDMA Ecstasy 34.0 21.6 32.1 27.3
Heroin (Putauw) 14.2 5.4 12.9 13.3
Gan·a 84.9 86.5 85.1 83.9
Morphine 2.4 0.0 2.0 1.6
Barbiturates 22.6 10.8 20.9 8.3
Cocaine 1.4 0.0 1.2 1.0
LSD 1.4 0.0 1.2 0.5
Magic mushroom 8.5 5.4 8.0 2.6
(Kecubung)
Others 4.2 0.0 3.6 2.1
Types of Drugs used in the
past year
Methamphetime (Shabu) 9.9 2.7 8.8 24.5
MDMA Ecstasy 11.3 0.0 9.6 37.1
Heroin_ (Putauw) 7.1 0.0 6.0 11.8
Gan·a 23.6 32.4 24.9 28.6
Morphine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3
Cocaine 1.4 0.0 1.2 25.0
LSD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Magic mushroom 2.8 0.0 2.4 0.0
(Kecubung)
Others 0.5 0.0 0.4 12.5
1
Total number of respondents who had used drugs
2
More than one answer
Drug Abuse Treatment Data, 2003-2006
Table 6A indicates a decreasing trend of drug users admitted in treatment
centers from 2003 to 2006, with a decreased rate of 29%. In 2003, forty two (42)
treatment facilities reported 7,014 drug cases. In 2004, 70 treatment facilities
reported 8,903 cases, and in 2006, about 73 treatment facilities reported 6,359 cases.
Some concerns have been raised with regard to the low number of drug users
being treated relative to the overall need. Observations indicate that it could be due
to lack of quality control of treatment centers' operations, lack of treatment capacity,
high cost of treatment, relapse rates are high some up to almost 90% and perhaps
treatment system remains largely voluntary.
Table 6A. Total Number of Drug Users ill Indonesia

from Drug Treatment and Rehabilitation Facilities, Based on
,... ,...
DRUG OF ABUSE
1003
(4J)TIR
wiRSKO
No. %
_
D ruaor Abuse 2006
.... (19)TIR
Fadlidet
w/RSKO
No. %
(40) TIR
Fad lltin
w/RSKO
No. % No.
2006
(96)TIR
Fadlittn
w!RSKO
%
Heroin :5033 71.8 4983 56 3.451 69 21:51 33.8
Gana/Cannabi.l
ATS
Sedalivts/H aotia
692
,.
,.
9.9
3.7
2.2
817
711
271
9.2
8.0
3.0
,.,
424
31
8.5
10.8
0.6
,..
900
166
14.2
9. 1
2.6
lnbalanb 7 0. 1 4 0.4 4 0. 1 26 0.4
A kobo! 198 2.8 2" 2.4 367 7.3 3>4 5.6
Conine 0 0 2 0.2 2 0. 1 81 1.3
Benzodiazeplnes 17 0.2 49 I 393 6.2
Multi leDru Usen 669 9.5 1.101 12.4 114 2.3 1662 26.1
Otben
TOTAL
144
7014
Sour«. Nat1onal NarcotiCS Soard (BNN)
2.1
100
780
8,903
and MOH, Rl, 2006
8.7
100 "
4998
0.3
100
46
6 59
0.7
100
Table 68. Drug Abuse Treatment & Rehabilitation Data Per province and
Per ofDru of Abuse 2006
N~
......,_ T..,l
.. .......
c.....
or u...
MM·
......
..... """"""
.....·~ ..... """"'
2107 89 1660 100
Mold
101
"'""'ll7
912 260 lOS 50 497
648 284 199 76 89
323 4 17 47 2 253
285 143 53 101 27 61
266 4 36 39 187
2119 10 10 59 130
162 162
145 145
112 27 13 72
107 I 32 25 18 31
98 I 39 31 26
70 70
10 7
"
35
29
22
I
4 17
20
6
12
27 27
II II
'
Type of Illicit Drugs Used by Treatment and Rehabilitation Patients,
2003-2006
In 2003, 42 treatment facilities reported 7,014 with heroin as the primary
drug of abuse (72%), followed by cannabis (9.9'/o), ATS (3.7%), alcohol (2.8%) and
sedatives (2.2%). In 2004, 70 treatment facilities reported 8,903 cases with similar
ranking of drugs of abuse. In 2006, the 73 treatment facilities reported 6,359 cases
with heroin still remaining as the primary drug of abuse, although significant
decrease in the percentage of heroin users adntitted for treatment occurred from 2003
to 2006 while ATS abusers adntitted in treatment facilities increased significantly by
124% from 2003-2006 (Figure 2). Poly.J.rug users also increased significantly.
Benzodiazepine abused in 2006 was 6.2 percent of the cases.
Figure 1. Type of Drugs Used, 1003 -1006
• Ganja • ATS
• Alcohol • Cocaine
• Multiple drug use
Source: NationaJ Narcotics Board (BNN), 2003-2006
10
Demographic Data of Drug Abusers in Treatment Centers, 2006
Drug abusers admitted in treatment and rehabilitation centers were generally
young adults, with ages rnnging from 20 to 29 years. Majority (92%) were males;
majority were senior high school students; unemployed, and not married.
Figure 3. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Age Group, 2006
Figure 4. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Gender, 2006
So•ru: National Narcotics Board (BNN) and MOH, Rl, 2006
II
Figure S. Drug Abuser in lndonesi~ by Education Attainment, 2006
~ "'f i >
l f ,.
2
~ a~ !!" !!"
a .. = i
~
I
2
!i
!'
t
f ~
So•rtt: NarionaJ Narcotics Board (BNN) and MOH, RI, 2006
Figure 6. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Employment, 2006

2500
2181
2000
1500
1000
500
= :
"~ ~ ~
2
5 ~
~
IC'
; ~ ,.i!
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN) and MOH. RI, 2006
Figure 7. Drug Abuser in lndonesi~ by Marital Status, 2006
I• Muried Not <lear I

Sooree' National Nam>tic:s Boanl (BNN) and MOH, Rl, 2006
ll
Figure 8. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Admission Status, 2006
Types of Drug Used by Drug Abuse TIR Patieots, 2006.
Heroin still remained the most commonly abused drugs among the TR
patients in 2006, followed by ganja, ATS, and benzodiazepine. Majority were
injecting, followed by inhaling the drug and swallowing. Majority were polydrug
users (Figure 9).
Figure 9. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Type of Drugs used, 2006

2500 2151
2000
'""'
1000
""'
!&
~
!~ i.=- i..-
~ I
Sotutt: National Narcotics Board (BNN) and MOH. RI, 2006
Figure 10. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Methods of Drug Use, 2006
-......
"""
,
,
,,.. ...
"'"
....... '"'
"
!
~
i.. ~
...
if j
~ :1
i
s
Souru: National Narcotics Board (BNN) and MOH. RI, 2006
13
Injecting Drug Use 2006
In 2006, the national survey on drug abuse among students estimated that 2
out of 1000 high school/university students interviewed were injecting drug users.
Among those who bad used drugs in their lifetime (about 1.4 million-!.? million
students bad used drugs in their lifetime), about 2.4% were IDUs. The higher the
education, the higher the use of injecting drugs. More males (85.5%) were injecting
drug users than females (14.2%). Majority of the IDUs were within the age group
15-19 years (Table 6).
The three provinces with the highest number of Injecting Drug Users among
university students were Yogyakar1a (16 per 1000); Metro Jakar1a (15 per 1000); and
Central Java (14 per 1000). Injecting Drug Use in the city was higher in the city
(2.2% per I 000) than in the rural area (I. 7 per I 000) in all levels of education.
Table 6. Total Number of Injectiog Drug Users

by Edueational Level, Gender and Age Group, 2006
Citv/Raral Ja.JorBS SealorBS Acadeaoy/Faadty Toeal

N l2 65 61 148
Geuder
-Male 77.3 90.8 83.6 85.8
-Female 22.7 9.2 16.4 14.2
Age Group
-<15 so 0 0 7.4
-15-19 so 92.3 23 57.4
->20 0 7.7 77 35.1
Drug Related ArresU, 2001 -2006. For the past five years (2001-2006), the number
of illicit drug related arrests in Indonesia had significantly increased by 542%. From
2004 to 2006, the increase was 179% and from 2005 to 2006, 39"/o (Figure II).
Figure 11. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrestees

in Indonesia, 2001 - 2006
. .
,, ,, lotJ ...
,
-
I• No. of illicit drag nlattd ...restees I
Source: National Narcotics Board {BNN}, 2001-2006
""
14
Significant increase (179%) can be noted in the number of people arrested
due to illicit drug related cases from II ,323 arrestees in 2004 to 31,635 in 2006. No
significant changes in the demographic data of drug anestees from 2005 to 2006,
with arrestees predominMtly males, Indonesian nationality, above 30 years of age
with senior high education and majority were employed. The number of arrests from
the working groups generally increased significantly from the year 2002 to 2005 but
generally decreased in all types of occupation in 2006 (fable I). Decreased of
arrestees working in private companies from 47o/o in 2005 to 35% in 2006 is noted
while arrestees from manuaVunskilled labors increased from 29"/o in 2005 to 36% in
2006. The rests were farmers (2%), Armed Forces/police personnel (I%) and civil
servant (I%). Also noted is the dramatic increased (192%) of arrests among the
unemployed from 2002 to 2005 and decreased slightly in 2006.
Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Gender. Since 2000. illicit drug arrestees were
predominantly males significant increased (187%) from 2004 to 2006 (Figure 12),
although the number of females arrested bas also gradually increased from 2000 to
2006.
Out of 21 ,046 drug arrestees in 2005, majority (92%) were males (Figure 12-A).
Very slight change in the proportion can be noted in 2006 (Figure 12-B).
Fig•rr 12-A. Totll N1111mberofUiicil flgure 11-8. ToUI NumberofDiicil
Dru& Related Arnst ht .. dD•esia by Dn11 Related Arrest in lftdo•es ia by
Gender, 20M Gender,2006
.....
93%
SHru: National Nan:otics Board (BNN), 200S Sotlru: National Narcotics Board (BNN). 2006
13
Figure 13. Total Number of Drug Arrest, by Gender, 2000-2006
So•ru: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2000-2006
Significant increase in the number of arrest in both genders from 2005 to

2006 can be noted with about 40% increased for males and 28% for females (Figure
13.)
Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Nationality, 2005-2006. Arrestees in 2005 and

2006 were predominantly (99%) Indonesians (Figure 14). Significant increase of
arrests (181%) among Indonesian nationality can be noted from 2004-2006 while
39% increase can be noted from 2005 to 2006. The number of foreigoers arrested
remains stable (Figure 15).
Figure 14. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest io Indonesia,

by Nationality, 2005-2006
Sourtt: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2005-2006
16
FlpulS.TOCliJN. .bor.,JlliciC.,..Re-Arr..Cilll....,_ia,
1Jr Nllfiollaliey, Zllfti.Z41fj
·-
:mz DB
So•rce: Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN), 2000-2006
Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Age, 2005-2006. Majority of the people arrested
due to drug related offeoses since 2000 were above 30 years old. In 2003, significant
increased of arrestees among this age group can be noted and continued to increase
in 2006, with significant increased of 166% from 2004 to 2006 (Figure 16). This is
followed by age groups 25-29 and 2()..24 with very slight differeoce and finally and
age groups 16-19. No significant difference in the proportion of age groups among
drus arrestca can be DOled in 2005 and 2006 (Fisum 17-A and 17-BJ.
Figure 16. Total Na mber of Illicit Drag Related Arre•t In Jadoa ..t.,
by Age Groap, 2000..2006
So•ru: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2000-2006
17
Figure 17-A. Total Nvmbe1-oflllict Figure 17-8. Totlil N•mberof
Dr•1 Arrest. by Aze, 1:005 lllkit Dn1 Arrat, by Aze, 2006
t•..- 7%
26~.
• < IS ye•rs • 16-19 ynrs • 2~24 ynrs

• 20-24
2S-29 ynrs • >30
So.rce: National Natt:Otics Board (BNN). 200S Sotlrce: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2006
Illicit Drug Related Arrests, by Education, 2005-2006. Since 2000, most of the
drug arrestees had senior high education. A dramatic increased of drug arrestees
among those with senior high education in the last four years can be noted,
increasing from 3,141 in the year 2002 to 20,977 in 2006, an increased of 568%
(Figure 18). From 2004 to 2005, the percentage of arrestees with senior higb
education increased by 134% and from 2005-2006, it continued to increase by 46%
(Figure 18).
More than sixty percent (63%) of those arrested due to illicit drug offences in
2005 had senior higb education, 23% had junior higb education, II% had primary
grade education and 3% had academy/ university education (Figure 19-A). In 2006,
the proportion of arrestees, by education, seemed to be relatively the same (Figure
19-B).
Figur e 18. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by E ducation, 2000-2006
Source: Badan Narkotika NasionaJ (BNN), 2000-2006
18
F'egurc 19-A. Total number or Illicit Dn.g flcure 19-B. Tot.! Nu•beror
Related Arnsts i• htdoHiia, Illicit Ontc Rellted Arrats i•
by Educatioa, 2005 ladonaia. by Educatio11, 2006
13%
• Primary Grade • J••ior Higla

= ~~io r1ifhadt • !~:~;."~.~-
1
• Senior lltgh acade•y!Ua~.
Source: Nllional NatCO(ics Board (BNN), 2005 Source: National NatCO(ics Board (BNN), 2006
Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Occupotion. Majority (73%) of the illicit drug
offender.; arrested in 2005 were employed, 22% were unemployed and five percent
(5%) were students (Figure 20-A). No sigoificant change in the proportion can be
noted in 2006 (Figure 20·8).
Figure 20-A. Toto! Number Illicit Drug Figure 20-B. Toto! Number Illicit
Related Arrest in Indonesia, Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,
by Occupation, 2005 by Oc:cupation, 2006
5% 5%
S..rce: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 200S S..rce: National Narcotics ao.d (BNN), 2006
Among the employed, 47% worked in private companies in 2005; 29% were
oosk.illed/manual laborer.;; 200/o worked as private entrepreneurs; 1% fanners; 1%
Armed Forces/police personnel and 1% civil servants (Figure 21-A).
19
Figure 21-A. Total Number ofllli<it Drog Related Arrests amoog the
Employed in Indonesia, by Occupation, 2005
• CiviiMrnnt • Armed Forces/Police • E•ployf'e in private co.

Entre rennr • F.rmer • Laborer
Sooru: Badan Narkottb Nasional (BNN), 2005
The proportion of drug arrestees among those employed in private companies

showed significant decrease in 2006 (from 47% in 2005 to 35% in 2006), while
significant increase in the proportion of arrestees among the unskilled/manual
laborer.; (29% in 2005 to 36% in 2006), is indicated in Figure 21-B.
Figure 21-B. Total Number oflllicit Drog Related Arrests amoog the Employed
in Indonesia, by Occupation, 2006
• Civil Servant • Armed Forces/Police • Employf'e in private co.

Entrepreneur • Farmer • Labortr
Source: Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN). 2006
The number of arrests from these working groups generally increased

significantly from the year 2002 to 2005 but generally decreased in all types of
occupation in 2006 (Table 7). Also noted is the dramatic increased of arrests among
the unemployed, which increased from 1726 in 2002 to 5048 in 2005 with 192%
increased and decreased slightly in 2006.
20
Table 7. Distribution of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,
by Occupation 2000-2006
YEAR
OCCUPATION
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Civil servant 36 39 31 57 64 137 29
Armed Forces/
37 6 40 54 112 233 80
Police
Employee in 1,268 1,228 1,766 2,991 3,541 8,143 3,559
private co.
Entrepreneur 669 769 656 1,029 1,579 3,504 2,423
Farmer 154 127 99 132 222 323 377
Laborer 569 833 582 1111 1,774 5048 3,651
University 260 202 257 345 356 610 418
Students
High School 206 141 153 309 214 393 369
Students
Unemployed 1,756 1,579 1,726 3,689 3,453 5,048 4,588
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2()()()..2006
Illicit Drug Related Arrests iD Indonesia, 2000-2006. Significant increased in tbe

number of illicit drug related arrests can be noted from tbe year 2000 to 2005,
particularly of ganja and psychotropic drugs (which include ecstasy and shabu)
related arrest. Other addictive substances arrests remain stable from 2003 to 2006
(Figure 22).
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2()()()..2006
21
Illicit drug related arrests, by type of drugs, 2004-2006. From 2004 to 2006,
ganja consistently ranked first with the most number of arrests, followed by
methamphetamine, heroin and ecstasy (Table 8/Figures 23-A,B,& C).
The number of arrests relating to ganja increased significantly by 122% from

2004 to 2006. Arrests related to cocaine increased significantl y by 400% from 2004-
2006. Arrests related to heroin remained stable (Table 8).
Total number of arrests related to ATS from 2004 to 2006 had been relatively
stable although a 31% increased from 2004 to 2005 occurred and a 21% decreased
in 2006. Other psychotropic drugs (G-List) have been stable since 2004 (Table 2/
Figures 22-A,B,& C).
Table 8. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

by Type of drug seized, 2004-2006
ILLICIT DRUG YEAR
NO.
RELATED ARREST 2004 2005 2006
I. Total Narcotic Arrest 5,223 8,171 9,422
I. Gan·a 3,272 5,583 7,257
2. Hashish 12 10 s
3. Heroin 1,930 2,574 2,143
4. Morphine /Candu /opium 6 I
s. Cocaine 3 3 IS
II. Total ATS Arrest 4,522 5,943 4,683
I. Ecstasy 1,456 1,698 1,548
2. Methamphetamine (Shabu) 3,066 4,245 3,135
III. Other psych otropic drugs 914 790 975
(tablet) G-List Drugs
IV. Total Other addictive 559 1,348 2,275
Substances
I. Alcoho l 651 1,339 2,246
2. Traditional herbs 8 s 7
3. Cosmetics 2 4 14
4. Fake drugs 8
Total 11,3I5 I6,252 I7,355
Sou rce: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2004-2006
22
Fiprel.l-A. Total N••bcrofiUidt Flf:•rell-8. Tetal N••berefl.it Dr111
Dn~c Rebted Al'ftlta., by~ of Reb ted Arnsts, by Type ef Orwp, 2005
Drucs. 2004
5%
9%
So•rc~: National Narcotics Board (BNN). 2004 Sour«: National Nan::otics Board {DNN). 2005
Figure 23-C. Total Number of Illicit Dral!l: Related Anats,

by Type of Drop, 2006
Otber
Psychotropic
Drugs
Sbabu
6•1.
0%
0"/o
Soun=e: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2006
Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Provillee, 2004-2006. Overall, the ten provinces
reporting the most number of illicit drug related arrest in 2004 to 2006 are as follows:
(I} Metropolitan Jakarta, (2) North Sumatra, (3) East Java, (4) Central Java, (5) West
Java, (6) Bali; (7) Riau; (8) East Kalimantan; (9) South Kalimantan; and (10)
Yogyakarta (Figure 24 !fable 9).
23
In 2005, significant increased in the number of illicit drug arrests is noted in
these provinces with Metropolitan Jakarta having 6538 total arrests followed by
Central Java (2592); East Java (2473); North Suma!Ia (2308); Riau (628); NTB
(555); Bali (505); East Kalimantan (391); and South Kalimantan (354).
In 2006, significant increased of arrests were reported in 3 provinces:

Metropolitan Jakarta with 15% increase of arrests; North Somalia with 143%
increased, and West Java with 83% increased. Significant decrease of arrests can be
noted in Central Java in 2006 with 326%; Riau (234%) and East Java (35%)
(Figure24).
Figure 24. Total Number of lllieit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia, by

Province, 2004-2006
coo
.l I ~ :MJ I
.. • Ill -.
·-·----.
1 ..
0
:-~
. . l=t=l= "Fl:.
~':::
-"=" :;l
; :l:H~-r=H :: I
. -.. . . . . ... . .
~~
12111
~
••
-
- *.
m
B
D a
m
oO
m
N
m
..., -
;;IQ-.., 2511-
1lll! lSIII
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN). 2004-2006

•
a
am •
a :zn -m
~DB
~.
•
~
8
*g
•
•
•
D
24
Ecstasy Related Arrests, by Province and by Type of Drug Offense, 2005, 2006.
The provinces with most number of ecstasy related arrests (production, distribution
and consumption) in 2005 and 2006 are shown in Table 3. Metro Jakarta ranked first
with the most number of ecstasy related arrests in the areas of ecstasy production,
distribution or drug dealing and consumption in 2005 and 2006 (Table 9). Jakarta is
followed by North Sumatra, East Java, South Kalimantan and Lampung. Clandestine
laboratories were found in these provinces.
Table 9. Top Ranking Provinces in Indonesia with the Most Number of Ecstasy
Related Arrests, by Type of Drug Offense, 2005 and 2006
ECSTASY
Production Distribution Consumption
No. Provinces
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. Metro Jaya 7 337 248 786 416
2. North Sumatra 2 2 61 70 56 37
3. East Java I I 27 56 50 51
4. South Kalimantan I I 17 29 69 57
5. Lampung I 36 15 97 15
6. Bali 75 52 72 45
7. Riau 78 33 49 3
8. South Sumatra 19 21 67 9
9. Jambi 17 28 25 60
10. Central Java 24 16 34 8
II. East Kalimantan 20 34 30 15
12. Bangka Belitung I 22 21 22 13
13. West Kalimantan 16 41 6 16
14. West Java 16 9 25 14
15. Dl Yogyakarta 8 8 29 14
16. National Police
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2005, 2006
It can also be noted that a number of provinces experienced an increased in

ecstasy arrests in 2006 as follows: West Kalimantan; East Kalimantan, and Bangka
Belitung (Table I 0).
While ecstasy related arrests in South Sulawesi had been stable since 2004,
the number of shabu related arrests had a very significant increased (1157%) with 7
arrests in 2004 to 88 arrests in 2006. Bangka Belitung also experienced significant
increased (100%) related to methamphetamine (shabu) arrests with 7 arrests in 2004
to 14 in 2006 (Table I0).
25
Table 10. Total Number of Ecstasy Related Arrests in Indonesia, by Type
of Drug Offense, by Province, 2004-2006
ECSTASY
Dealing/ Consumption!
No. Provi..Dtes Production
TnffiekiD2 Use
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. Aceh 2
2. North Sumatra • 2 2 2 61 70 37 37
3. West Sumatra 5 3 28 10
4. Riau• 9 78 33 28 3
5. Bengkulu I 12
6. Jambi 17 28 19 60
7. South Sumatra• 8 2 19 21 19 9
8. Lampung • 6 1 36 15 44 15
9. Metro Jakarta• 1 5 337 248 439 4!6
10. West Java 16 9 20 21
II. Central Java 24 16 30 8
12. Yogyakarta 8 8 26 14
13. East Java• 3 I I 27 56 43 51
14. Bali• 4 75 52 62 45
15. West Nusa Tenggara I I 3 I
16. East Nusa Tenggara
18. South Kalimantan• 5 I I 17 29 33 57
19. Central Kalimantan 2 3 4 5
20. East Kalimantan 20 34 14 15
21. South Sulawesi 5 9 5 2
22. Southeast Sulawesi 2
23. Central Sulawesi I 3
24. North Sulawesi I I 3
25. Maluku I I
26. Papua
27. Bangka Be1i1itung 22 21 10 13
28. Gorontalo 2
29. Kep. Riau 2 5
30. Banten I
31. National Police 3 6 26 5
TOTAL 9 12 796 731 891 805
26
Methamphetamine Related Arrests, by Province and by Type of Drug offense,
2005, 2006. Unlike ecstasy, no clandestine/kitchen laboratory in the production of
methamphetamine was found in 2005 and 2006. The provinces with most number
of methamphetamine related arrests (production, distribution and consumption) in
2005 and 2006 were relatively the same as with ecstasy arrests with very sli ght
change in the ranking as shown in Table II. Again, Metro Jakarta ranked first with
the most number of methamphetamine related arrests (distribution or drug dealing
and consumption) in 2005 and 2006, followed by East Java, North Sumatra, South
Kalimantan, Central Java, Riau, Bali, East Kalimantan , West Java and South
Sulawesi (Tables 11112).
Table 11. Top Ranking Provinces in Indonesia with the Most Number of
methamphetamine Related Arrests, by Type of Drug Offense, 2005, 2006
METHAMPHETAMINE
Production Distribution Consumption
No. Provinces
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. MetroJaya I 462 326 569 503
2. East Java 197 239 704 358
3. North Sumatra 205 !58 486 372
4. South Kalimantan 32 49 187 168
5. Central Java 50 40 162 118
6. Riau 194 33 81 14
7. Bali II 43 81 56
9. West Java 27 31 78 46
10 South Sulawesi 10 25 38 63
II. DI Yogyakarta 5 6 81 56
12. Jambi 7 19 102 28
13 Central Kalimantan II II 47 28
27
Table 12. Total Number of Methamphetamine (Shabu) Related Arrests
in Indonesia, by Type of Arrest, by Province, 2004·2006
METHAMPHETAMINE SHAB
Dealing/ Consumption/
No. Provioea Produetion
Traffickio2 Use
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. Aceh 5 3 3 3
2. North Sumatra 205 158 486 372
4. Riau 194 33 74 14
5. Bengkulu 2 4
6. Jambi 7 19 102 28
7. South Sumatra 5 9 17 5
8. Lampung 8 2 21 7
9. Metro Jakarta I 462 326 569 503
10. West Java 27 31 78 46
II. Central Java 50 40 162 118
13. East Java 197 239 704 358
14. Bali II 43 81 56
15. West Nusa Tenggara 8 6 II 15
18. South Kalimantan 32 49 187 168
19. Central Kalimantan II II 47 28
22. Southeast Sulawesi 2 II 5
23. Central Sulawesi 4 26 I
24. North Sulawesi I I 4
25. Maluku 3 3
26. Papua I
27. Bangka Belitung I 5 7 9
28. Gorontalo 10 2
29. Kep. Riau 3 8
30. Banten 2 I
31. National Police I I 20 2 7
TOTAL 2 - 1,349 1,145 2,894 1,189
Source. NatiOnal Narcottcs Board (BNN), 2004 2006
28
Table 13. Total Number of ATS & other Psychotropic Drugs Related Arrests
in Indonesia, by Province, 2004-2006
-- .....
ATS
-
Poychotropk
No. i'roviDCa
,... ,.,.
Eawy
,... 2106 ,... G-Liot
200!1
Acch 36
2. Nonh Sumatra 86 100 109 306 691 530 14 14
3. West Sumatra 21 33 13 9 32 41
4. Riau 36 106 36 134 268 47
5. Bengkulu 13
6. Jambi 22 36 88 87 109 47
7. SouthSumatrn 16 40 38 22 14
Lampung 80 31 17 29
8.
9. MetroJakana "
818 776 669 764 1,032 829 394 126 274
10. West Java 42 36 30 160 105 77 146 141 128
II.
12.
CcntrnlJava
Yl)gyakana
90
15
"
34
24
22
217
41
21 2
86
158
62
31
26
32
30
"18
13. East Java 44 71 108 516 901 591 107 m 219
14. Bali 49 137 97 39 92 99
15. West Nusa Tenggan 13 19 21
16. East Nusa Tenggan
West Kalimantan 22 50 32 17
17.
" 24
18. South Kalimantan 51 87 268 219 217
39 12 "
19
19.
20.
Central Kalimantan
East Kalimantan 34 49
36
320 "
207 164 142 169
21. South Sulawesi 15 10 II 48 88 17
22. Southeast Sulawesi II
23. Central Sulawesi 30
24. North Sulawesi 13
25. Maluku
26. Pa ua
27. BangkaBelitun 32 34 14
28. Gorontalo 12
29. Kep. Riau II
30. Ban ten

31. National Police 27
TOTAL 1,456 1,698 1,548 3,066 4,245 3, 135 914 790 975
Source National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2004-2006
29
A number of provinces which had few or no ATS arrests in the past had
emerged with ATS (ecstasy and methamphetamine) problem in recent years as
indicated by the number of ATS related arrests shown in Table 7. These provinces
are as follows: (I) East Nusa Tenggara; (2) Papua; (3) Banten; (4) Maluku; (S) North
Sulawesi; (6) Gorontalo; (7) North Sulawesi; (8) Aceh; (9) Kep. Riau (Batam) (10)
Southeast Sulawesi.
The most number of arrests due to other Psychotropic drugs (G-List) in

2004 to 2006 came from (I) Metro Jakarta; (2) East Java; (3) West Java; and (4) East
Kalimantan. These are followed by Central Java, South Kalimantan and Yogyakarta
and Central Kalimantan, but with lesser number of arrests (Tables 13).
Ganja Related Arrests, 2005-2006. The number of arrestees due to ganja

cultivation increased by 62% from 2005 to 2006. Ganja production is generally
found in the island of Sumatra as evidently shown in Table 8 with North Sumatra
having the most number of ganja related arrests in 2005 followed by Aceh, South
Sumatra, West Sumatra and Jambi. In 2006, Aceh ranked first with the most number
of arrestees due to illicit ganja production followed by North Sumatra, and Jambi
(Table 14).
Arrests due to illicit ganja dealing/trafficking increased (22%) from 2,662

in 2005 to 3236 in 2006. Metro Jakarta had the most number of arrestees in 2005
and 2006. This is followed by North Sumatra, Riau, West Java, Aceh, East Java,
West Sumatra, Lampung, Central Java, Bali and Yogyakarta in 2005. In 2006, North
Sumatra remained second to Metro Jakarta followed by West Java, West Sumatra,
East Java, Central Java, Riau, Jambi, Yogyakarta and Lampung ..
Metro Jakarta remained the province with the most number of ganja users
arrested from a total of 1429 in 2005 to 2373 ganja arrestees in 2006, followed North
Sumatra, West Java, West Sumatra, Yogyakarta, East Java, Central Java, Jambi, Bali
and Lampung. It is interesting to note that Aceh which had the highest arrestees due
to illicit ganja cultivation in 2006 had relatively low number of arrestees due to ganja
use (Table 14).
30
Table 14. Total Number of Cannabis (Ganja) Related Arrests in Indonesia,
by Type of Arrest, by Province, 2005, 2006
Cannabis Gao·a
Dealing/ Consumption/
No. Provinces Production
TraffickiDK Use
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. Aceh 8 36 91 52 8 lO
2. North Sumatra 21 30 707 793 654 676
3. West Sumatra 3 l 69 115 50 Ill
4. Riau l 1 202 66 43 9
5. Bengkulu 1 2 12 1
6. Jam hi 3 6 22 56 41 43
7. South Sumatra 7 l 12 12 13 14
8. Lampung 68 33 56 26
9. Metro Jakarta 1,024 1,552 1,429 2,373
10. West Java 3 2 193 228 253 318
11. Central Java 5 1 56 83 81 75
12. Yogyakarta 1 38 47 83 99
13. East Java 3 2 82 92 89 88
14. Bali 1 39 47 33 36
15. West Nusa Tenggara 13 9 4 9
18. South Kalimantan 5 2 2 3 3
19 Central Kalimantan 2 1 2
22. Southeast Sulawesi 2 1
23. Central Sulawesi 1
24. North Sulawesi 2
25. Maluku 5 1
26. Papua 4 8
27. Bangka Belitung 4 14 8 5
28. Gorontalo
29. Kep. Riau 10 6
30. Banten 3
31. National Police 2 l
55 89 2,662 3,236 2,866 3,932
TOTAL
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2005,2006
31
Table 15. Total Number of Heroin Related Arrests in Indonesia, by Type of
Arrest, by Province, 2005, 2006
Heroin
Dealing/ Conoumpdoo/
No. Proviacea Producdon
Traffickin2 Use
2005 2006 2005 2006 2005 2006
I. Aceh I I
2. North Sumatra 23 IS 94 87
4. Riau 6 I
5. Bengkulu
6. Jarnbi 4 2 4
7. South Sumatra
8. Larnpung 2 I 6
9. Metro Jakarta 858 71 4 1,293 1,08 1
10. West Java 14 7 21 17
II. Central Java 6 5 II 6
13. East Java 20 29 82 59
14. Bali 25 6 21 26
IS. West Nusa Ten1Z.2ara 2
18. South Kalimantan
19. Central Kalimantan I
20. East Kalimantan 3
21. South Sulawesi 13 I 14
22. Southeast Sulawesi
23. Central Sulawesi
24. North Sulawesi I
25. Maluku I
26. Papua
27. Banda Belitung I
28. Gorontalo I
29. Kep. Riau I
30. Banten
31. National Police I 17 I
TOTAL 980 818 2,574 1,325
Source: Nalional Narcolics Board (BNN), 2005, 2006
32
Arrests due to heroin trafficking/dealing and consumption in 2005 and
2006 were generally high on the island of Java and Bali. Metro-Jakarta ranked first
with the most number of arrestees due to heroin trafficking/dealing and use, followed
by North Sumatra, Bali, East Java, West Java, Yogyakarta and South Sulawesi
(Table 15).
Seizures of Illicit Drugs, 2000-2006

The amount of illicit drugs seized from 2005 to 2006 generally decreased or
stable except for ecstasy and methamphetamine which experienced significant
increased with 37% and 23% respectively.
Cannabis seizure in 2005 increased significantly (169%) from 8,493.5 kg
in 2004 to 22,835.7 kg in 2005 and decreased by 51% in 2006 (Table 16).
Table 16. Seizures of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia, 2000-2006
YEAR
DRUGS
1000 1001 1001 1003 1004 1005 1006
22835.7 II
Cannabis(kg) 6333.9 2779 1.1 61291.4 24 204.7 8493.5
718.4
Hashish(gr) 3 888.64 5631.8 687 642.62 607. 1 720. 1 4734.2
Heroin(kg) 22.7 16 .6 20.0 21.9 12.7 19.8 10.6
Morphine(gr) 2ll 0.68 II
Cocaine(kg) 17.4 30.1 2.3 28.6 6.3 1.0 1.1
Ecstasy(Tablet) 109,567 90,523 84,4 13 205,700 25 1,072 255,0 16 349,61 I

Methamphetamine/ 368.1 1,214.8
76.7 48.8 46.7 22.6 28.4
Shabu(kg)
Other psychotropic
drugs(tablet)G-List 382,174 375,640 421 ,259 238,300 1,045,290 2,272,419 755,252
Drug>
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), January 2000-2006
Ganja Seizures. In 2004, there was a total seizure of 113.7 hectares on ganja
cultivation, a total seizure of 8,493.5 kg of dri ed ganja leaves and 214,914 ganja
plants. In 2005, the area seized decreased to 62.33 hectares but increased to 289.64
hectares in 2006. Aceh consistently ranked the largest area for ganja cultivation with
162,387 in 2005 to 949,114 plants in 2006 fo llowed by North Sumatra and
Bengkulu.
Cannabis seizures continued to increase significantly from 2000 to 2002. In

2003, the amount of ganja seized decreased significantly up to 2004, increased
significantly (169%) in 2005 and decreased by 51% in 2006 (Table 16/ 17/Figure 25).
33
Figure 25. Seizures of Ganja, 2000-2006
70,000
60,000 •
50,000
1\
40,000
I \
30,000
I \
20,000 / \. ~
10,000
/ .~.../ ~
41
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Sotoree: Nllhonal Narco6cs Board (BNN), 2000.2006
Figure 26. Connabis Seizures in Indonesia, 2006
• '> 1.000,000 Kz :4,000-I,OOO,OOOKc - :<4..000Kg ~ :O.liNoiAvailllble

Table 17. Seizures of Ganja, ATS and Psychotropic Drugs,
by Provinces, 2005-2006
584.50
1 7934 19
14 6115
"'
148.555
15084
42 1 672 9053.5
4746 1.3345
274 5002 131.103
"'
"' '"
4.191
.
21.587
59JHO 57.222
.
1301125 98252 438 418
1.045
81 50
J "
OJ 74 2S '"'"
51030
HS9 16 121 87 ' JJ
2.58194 4.7362 1.32375

"'
""
15.08
29.296.3H7 I lS I
4208 10.004
226.5 140.20
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2000-2006
Methamphetamine seizures 2000-2006. Reported total seizure for

methamphetamine indicated a dramatic increased from 27,837.26 gr. in 2004 to
260,164.35 grin 2005, and I ,237,922.15 gr. in 2006 (Figure 26).
Figure 27. Seizures ofShabu in Indonesia, 2000-2006, in Kg.

1400
1200
1000
I
1110
I
600
7
I
400 ., '"'<<· .. '. 7'
...
200
./
0
""'
,.,
lOOI l002 lOOJI - I 20051
2l6 1&4 .16&1 1,214.81
~1\ltt~ne(shd:Ju)~
''"
"' I
Source: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2000-2006
35
Sbabu Seizures by Province. Metropolitan Jakarta consistently had the highest
seizures from 2004 to 2006 with 6,585.192 gr. in 2004 to 74,505.06 gr. in 2005, and
I, 188,510.7 gr. in 2006. East Java ranked second with 2,852.868 gr in 2004 to
19,114.74 grin 2006; followed by North Sumatra from 3,919.13 gr. in 2004 to
30,107 grin 2006 (Table 17).
Figure 28. Methamphetamine Crystal Seizures in Indonesia, 2006
• : > J,OOOGnu• : SOO - J,OOO Gnm - : < 500 Gnm ~ : Dlltao Not Av.i lab~
Ecstasy Seizures 2005-2006. In 2004, a total of 242,1% ecstasy tablets were

seized. In 2005, the total number of ecstasy tablets seized was relatively the same as
in 2004 but inereased sisnificantly (85%) again in 2006 with 463,550.30 tablets.
Since 2004 to 2006, metropolitan Jakarta has remained having the largest
amount of ecstasy tablet seizures followed by East Java, North Sumatra, Bali, East
Kalimantan, South Kalimantan, West Kalimantan, South Sumatnl and Lampung
(Table 17).
Figure 29 indicates an increasing trend in ecstasy seizures from 2002 to 2006

(Figure 27). From 2005 to 2006, a 37% increased of ecstasy seizure is noted.
Figure 29. Seizures of Ecstasy iD Indonesia, 2000-2006
/
_.,... ,/
/
... -..,
/
Dll
Soul't'e: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 21)0()..2006
Figure 30. Ecstasy Seizures iD Indonesia, 2006
• : > 3,000 Pills : 500- 3,000 Pills - : < 500 Pills ~ :Dahl Not Avail•ble
For other psychotropic drugs (G·List). Seizures of other psychotropic drugs (G·
List) increased significantly (1 17%) from 2004 to 2005 and decreased significantly
by 63% in 2006 (Figure 31 ).
37
Metro-Jakarta had the highest seizure of G-List drugs in 2005, followed by
Central Java, East Java, East Kalimantan (ranked first in 2004), South Kalimantan
(fable 17).
Figure 31. Seizures of G-List Drugs in Judouesia, 2000-2006
A
/\
/ \
0
.. ._,. / '
Souree: National Narcotics Board (BNN), 2000.2006
Figure 32. G-List Seizures in Judouesia, 2006
• : > 9,000 Pills :300 - 9,000Pills - :<JOOPIIIs 9 : O.t. NotAv1i11b~
38
Heroin and Cocaine Seizures, 2000..2006. The presence of heroin in Indonesia had
been stable since 2000 to 2006. Cocaine seizures bad a fluctuating trend since 2000
indicating a large increase in seizures in 200 I, a very dramatic decreased in 2002, a
significant increased in 2003 and significant decreased in 2004, with continued
decrease in seizures in 2005 and 2006 (Figure 33).
Figure 33. Seizures of Heroin and Cocaine in lndones~ 2000-2006
~+-------~r----------.r-------------------~
~+-~--~~~--------~~------------------~
1001 200Z 2003 2004 2005 1006

- -(!<g.)
Source: National Nan:otics Board (BNN), 2000-2006
Figure 34. Heroine Seizures in Indonesia, 2006
. : >lOOGnm : 100-200Gn• - : < IOOGnm ~:Data Not Available
39
Annexes
ANNEX I. LIST OF PROVINCES WITH PROVINCIAL

NARCOTICS BOARD AS OF 2007
NO. PROVINCIAL NARCOTICS BOARD (BNP)

I. Nangroe Aceh Darussalam (NAD
2. North Sumatera Sumatera Utara
3. Riau Island Kepulauan Riau
4. Bangka Be litung
5. Riau
6. West Sumatera Sumatera Barat
7. South Sumatera Sumatera Selatan
8. Bengku lu
9. Lampung
10. Jambi
II. Dki Jakarta
12. West Java Jawa Barat
13. Banten
14. Yogyakarta
15. Central Java Jawa Tengah
16. East Java Jawa Timur
17. West Ka limantan Kal imantan Barat
18. East Kalimantan Kalimantan Timur
19. South Kalimantan Kalimantan Se latan
20. Central Ka limantan Kal imantan Tengah
2 1. North Sulawesi Sulawesi Utara
22. Central Sulawesi Sulawesi Tengah
23. Southeast Sulawesi Su lawes i Tengf!;ara
24 . South Sulawesi Sulawesi Selatan
25. Gorontalo
26 . Bali
27 . West N usa Temu;~ara (Nusa Ten~Z.gara Barat
28 . East Nusa Tenggara (Nusa Tenggara Ti mur
29 . Maluku
30. North Maluku Maluku Utara
31. Papua
40
ANNEX 2. DRUG ABUSE RECORD FORM (INDONESIA)
YEAR
INSTITUTION :GENERAL HOSPIT AUM ENTAL HOSPITAUHEALTH CENTER/REHAB CENTER/PRISON
ADDRESS
DISTRICT I CITY
PROVINC E
.......
~
....,
"'""
.
,
·~
M A RfJAL
STAT\IS
Rounor
~-
IAST I MON'TII
M ....
um ... -· .,..CD I ·;:;::
""'"""" -c.u• c....
·~
~
DISCHAAGl
LReco....,cd
l . IW...,.ed
.......
JPaloe,..·•
·~
SU PERVISOR
(NAME)
41
ANNEX 3. DRUG ABUSE REPORT FORM (ANNUAL)
NO.
NUMBER/MONTH TOTAL
5 6 7 I 9 10 11 12 NUMBER
8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15
Institution
1. Hos ital
2. MentaiHos ita!
3. Rehabilitation
Center
4. Others
Admission
I. NcwCase
2. FailcdCase
Home Address
I. Cit
2. District
3. SubDistrict
4. Sex
I. Male
2. Female
A<
I. < 12 cars
2. J2.J9 ycars
3. 20-25 cars
~=
·
~I .
3. JuniorHigh
School
tion
2. PrimifV School
4. Senior High
School
S. Academy/
Facult
7. Occu ation
1. Civil Service
2. Private
3. Studcnt/uils
f=.s
.
1-:-- 6.
2. UnmarTicd
3. Widow/cr
42
I 9
10. OrugsBeingUscd
Since Last Month
10 II
" IJ 14 15
I Cannabis
2. Herion
3. Oth er O ioid
4 Cocaine
l . Am hethamine
6. Ecstas
7. Others
II . Route or
Administration
I. ln "ect
2. Oral / Swallow
3. Smoke / Inhale
4. Sniff / Snort
S. Others
12. Initiation A e
I. < 12
2. 12- 18 '"'
3. 19-25 '"'
4. 26-40 '"'
S. >40 '"'
13 . '"'
Hos italDischar e
I. Recovered
2. Patient's
Decision
3. Referred
4. Dead
14. Dru Sources
I. Drug Dealer /
Trafficker
2. Dispensary /
Dru Store
3. Others
ll. Motivation
I. Foo
2. PeerG rou
3 Problem
43
ANNEX 4. DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT DATA SOURCES 2003-2006
YEAR
NO. INSTITUTION LOCATION
2003 2004 1003 1016
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
I. Drug Dependency Jakarta ./ ./ ./ ./
Hospital
General Hospitals
2. RS San lah Denpasar, Bali ./ ./ ./ ./
3. RS Dr. Kariadi Semarang, Central ./ ./ ./
Java
4. RS Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandun~. West Java ./ ./ ./
5. RS Dr. Cipto Jakarta ./
Ma~gunku s umo
6. RS Fatmawati Jakarta ./ ./ ./
7. RS Dr. Moh . Hoesin Palembang, South ./ ./ ./
Sumatra
8. RS Dr. Wahidin, Makassar, South
Makassar Sulawesi
9. RS Dr. M. Jamil Padang ./
10. RS Pondok lndah Jakarta ./ ./ ./
II. RS Husada Jakarta ./ ./
12. RS St. Carolus Jakarta ./ ./
13. RS Duren Sawit Jakarta ./ ./
14. RS Persahabatan Jakarta ./ ./ ./
IS. RS Bhayangkara Jakarta ./
16. RS Moch Ansari South Kalimantan ./ ./
17. RS Atma H. South Kalimantan ./ ./
18. RS Tampan Riau ./
19. RS Dadi South sulawesi ./
20. RSUD Kab Serang Tangerang ./
21. RSUD Tangerang Tangerang ./
22. RS Wangaya Bali ./
23. RS Dr. Emaldi B South Sumatra ./
24. RS Charitas South Sumatra ./
25. RS Siti Chadi"ah South Sumatra ./
26. RS Muhammadyah South Sumatra ./
27. RS Pusri South Sumatra ./
28. RS Pertamina South Sumatra ./
29. RS Bina Alma Bali ./
30. RS Abdoel Moeloek Bandar Lam pun~ ./
Mental Hospitals
31. RSJ Soehato Heerd 'an Jakarta ./ ./
32. RSJ Dharma'aya Jakarta ./
33. RSJ Marzuki Mahdi Bogor, West Java ./ ./
34. RSJ Pontianak West Kalimantan ./
35. RSJ Tamban South Kalimantan ./ ./
44
I 2 3 4 5 6 7
36. RSJ Bandung West Java ./ ./ ./
37. RSJ Menur Surabava, East Java ./ ./
38. RSJCimahi West Java ./
39. RSJ A minoG Central Java ./
40. RSJ Sud 'arwadi Central Java ./
41. RSJ Menur Central Java ./
42. RSJ Surakarta Central Java ./
43. RSJ Ambon Maluku ./
44. RSJ Aceh Aceh ./
45. RSJ Kendari Southeast Sulawesi ./
46. RSJ Jambi Jambi ./ ./
47. RSJ Bali Bal i ./ ./
48. RSJ PalembanR South Sumatra ./
49. RSJ Prof. Dr. Soeroyo Mage lang, Central ./ ./ ./
Java
50. RSJ Dr. Radj iman Lawang, Central ./ ./ ./
Wed iod ini ngrat Java
51. RSJ Bi na Atma Denpasar, Bali ./ ./ ./
52. RSJ Bangli Bangli, Ba li ./ ./
53. RSJ BenRkulu Benltkulu ./
54. RSJ Lampuno Bandar Lampung ./
55. RSJ Mataram Mataram, NTB ./ ./ ./ ./
56. Sanatorium Jakarta ./ ./
DharmawanRsa
Health Centen
57. Kampung Bali H.C. Jakarta ./ ./
58. Tambora health Center Jakarta ./
59. Pasar Minggu H.C. Jakarta ./ ./ ./
60. Tebet H.C. Jakarta ./ ./
61. Pamulang H.C. Tangerang ./ ./
62. Kemiri H.C. Tangerang ./
63. Puskesmas Jakbar Jakarta ./
64. Puskesmas Jaksel ./
Rehabilitation Centers
65. Galih Pakuan R.C. Bo~or, West Java ./ ./ ./
66. PP lnsyaf R.C. Medan, North ./ ./ ./
Sumatra
67. PP Khusnul Khotimah Tan2eran2 ./ ./
68. Pamardi siwi T.C. Jakarta ./ ./ ./ ./
69. Yayasan Rumah Anak Jakarta ./ ./
Panah
70. Yavasan Darullchsan Jakarta ./ ./
71. Yayawan Terracotta Jakarta ./ ./
Yayasan Tulus Hati Jakarta ./ ./
72.
Yayasan Puri Elok Jakarta ./ ./
73.
Teratai
74. Yavasan Asa Ban~sa Jakarta ./ ./
45
I 2 3 4 s 6 7
75. Yayasan Dian Krida Jakarta ./ ./
Utama
76. Yayasan Al-Jahu Jakarta ./ ./
77. Yavasan Doulous Jakarta ./ ./
78. Yavasan Kasih Mu lia Jakarta ./ ./
79. Yayasan Karya Bhakt i Jakarta
80. Yayasan Pe lkesi Jakarta
81. Paguyuban Asuhan Jakarta
Napza
82. Wisma Adiksi Jakarta ./ ./
83. WismaAifiat Jakarta
84. Rumah Harapan dan Jakarta ./ ./
Pemulihan Bethesda
85 . Pondok Pesantren Jakarta
Suryalaya
86. Pondok Pesantren Tasikmalaya
Survalaya
87. Pondok Pesantren Surabaya, East Java ./ ./ ./
Surya laya
88. Pondok Pesantren ./
Hikmah Sya'adah
89. Getsemani Jakarta ./ ./
90 . Panti Napza PSK W South Kalimantan ./ ./
Me lati
91. Yayasan Kesehatan Bali ./ ./
Bangli
92. Yavasan Bali Nurani Bali ./ ./
93. Unit Van T&R UPRS West Kalimantan ./ ./
94. Yavasan Ar-Rahman South Sumatra ./
95. Yayasan Al-lch las South Sumatra ./
City Health Offices
96. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Banda Aceh
Banda Aceh
97. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Medan
Me dan
98. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Padang, West ./
Padang Sumatra
99. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pa lembang. South ./ ./
Palemban~ Sumatra
100. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandar lampung ./ ./
Bandar Lampung
101. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandung ./ ./
Bandun~
102. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Serang
Seran~
103. Di nas Kesehatan Kota Serna rang, Central
Semarang Java
46
I l 3 5 7
104. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Yogyakarta '
,/ ,/
6
Yo2Yakarta
105. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Surabaya, East Java ,/ ,( ,/
Surabaya
106. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Denpasar ,/ ,(
Denpasar
107. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pontianak ,(
Pontianak
108. Dinas Kesehatan Kola Samarinda ,(
Samarinda
109. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Menado ,(
Menado
110. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Balikpapan, East ,(
Balikpapan Kalimantan
Ill. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Makassar ,(
Makassar
SpKial Prisoas for
Dru& Crimloals
112. LP Pemuda Kelas U Tangerang, West ,( ,(
Java
Ill. Pematang Siantar North Sumatra ,( ,(
114. Lubuk LinJWtu West Sumatra ,/
115. Bandar Lampung Larnpung ,( ,(
116. Cipinan~ Jakarta ,( ,/
117. Banceuv West Java ,( ,( ,/
118. Madiun East Java ,/ ,(
119. Pamekasan East Java ,( ,( ,/
120. Martapura South Kalimantan ,( ,(
121. Ban li Bali ,/ ,/ ,( ,(

122. Maras South Sulawesi ,( ,(
12l. Jayapura Irian Jaya ,( ,(
124. Cirebon West Java ,( ,( ,(
125. Nusakambangan Central Java
126. Yo2Vakarta Di YoJtYakarta ,( ,(
127. Pad an• West Sumatra ,(
128. Tangerang Tangerang ,(
129. Kerobokan Bali ,/ ,(
Supporting
IDstitutiou
llO. Yavasan Pelita Ilmu Jakarta ,( ,(
Ill. Kios lnfonnasi Jakarta ,( ,( ,(

Atma·aya
ll2. Directorate PRSKN. Jakarta ,( ,(
Deot. Social Welfare
Ill. Directorate Bina Jakarta ,/ ,(
Khusus Narkotika
TOTAL 133 44 71 20 96
./ - Sent data
"
ANNEX 5. LIST OF PROVINCIAL POLICE OFFICE (POLDA)
NO. POLDA
I. Nanwoe Aceh Darussalam (NAD
2. North Sumatera Sumatera Utara
3. Riau Island (Kepulauan Riau
4. Bangka Belitung
5. Riau
6. West Sumatera Sumatera Barat
7. South Sumatera Sumatera Selatan
8. Bengk:ulu
9. Lam pun~
10. Jambi
II. DKIJakarta
12. West Java Jawa Barat
13. Banten
14. Yogyakarta
IS. Central Java Jawa TengahJ
16. East Java Jawa Timur
17. West Kalimantan Kalimantan Barat
18. East Kalimantan Kalimantan Timur
19. South Kalimantan (Kalimantan Selatan
20. Central Kalimantan (Kalimantan Tengah)
21. North Sulawesi Sulawesi Utara
22. Central Sulawesi Sulawesi Tengah)
23. Southeast Sulawesi Sulawesi Temurnra)
24. South Sulawesi Sulawesi Selatan
25. Gorontalo
26. Bali
27. West Nusa Ten22818 (Nusa Tenll.SW8 Barat
28. East Nusa Ten~ (Nusa TenRUra Timur
29. Maluku
30. North Maluku Maluku Utara
31. Papua
ANNEX 6. LAW ENFORCEMENT STANDARD RECORDING FORM
LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA MONTHLY RECORD FORM MONTH: ...... YEAR ....
=
::. ::::. 1 ::-;J"S"I~I''"I ::-. -·- ... ~1.::::. · -
49
ANNEX 7. LAW ENFORCEMENT DATA REPORTING FORM
I. Date 10. DrugRc:latc:dA r rc:sts

2. Provi-nce a Cannabis
3. Total Number of Arrests b. Heroine
a. DrugU;J~,~~~~~=-
4. Total Number of Drug Related Arruts c Cocaine
d. Morphine
b DrugDealc:r e. Methamphetamine (Shabu)
c. DrugTrafficking f. Ecstasy
d. DrugProducer g. DaftarG
e. Others h. BK
5. Sex: Mogadon
a. Male j. Valium
b. FemaliOo=====- k. Precursor
6. Nationality: I. Alcohol icBeverages
m. Other(specify) _ _ _ __
a Indonesian•• -=====-
b. Foreigner_
II. Drug Seizures
7. Age:
b.
<lSi!~~~~~
16-19
c. 20-24
a.
d. 25-29
Type of Drugs
Seized
Number of Cases Amount Seized Unit Cost
e. >30
8. Edo<Ot;oo'
a. Primary School:~=====
b.
c.
Junior High School
Senior High School
_ ~mp~~a~~::~aculty _ _ _ __
9
SW • Private
WS""Entrepreneur
c. TN • Farmer 12. Laboratory and Equipment Seized :
d. MH = University Student
e. BR .. Laborer a
b.
NumberofLaborato,.,,;="======------
Kind of Equipment_
f.PNG "' Unemployed
g. StreetChildrc:n
13. Number of Drug Related Dea ths (if known) _ _ _ _ _ __
h SexWorker
Entertainment Worker
Others
50
ANNEX 8. NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY OF ILLIC IT DRUG USE
AND TRAFFICKING IN INDONESIA, 2005
Com piled and Translated by Paulina G. Padmohoedojo, MA., MPH

Expert Consultant, National Narcotics Board, Indonesia
INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY

Th.is document presents the main findings of the 2005 National Household Survey on
Drug Abuse including boarding houses, conducted by the Health Research Center of
the University of Indonesia (Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan) and the National Narcotics
Board (BNN), Indonesia. The 2005 survey provides information on the use of illicit
drugs, alcohol and tobacco among members of Indonesia household population aged
10 to 60 in both city and rural areas, and residents of boarding houses in the cities.
Specifically, the survey had the following objectives:
• provides data about the prevalence of use of illicit drugs; tobacco and alcohol for
the total household population and for boarding house residents;
• examines the demographic correlates of the use of illicit drugs, alcohol and
tobacco;
• identifies high ri sk groups of drug abuse in the community;
Survey Location. Survey of household aged 12 to 60, was conducted in 16
provinces based on the number of drug cases reported and population density. To get
the drug abuse situation in the urban area, the capital cities of the 16 provinces were
selected. Only 7 provinces (North Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, Riau, West
Kalimantan, West Java, East Java) were selected to provide the drug situation in the
rural areas with one Regency (kabupaten) outside of the capital city chosen through
random sampling (Table I).
Table 1. Survey Locations in 16 Provinces
SurveY Loutloa
No. l'roviace CIIY Vlllaee
I. DKI Jakarta Jakarta
2. Dl Yogyakarta Yogyakarta
3. North Sulawesi Manado North Minahasa
4. West Nusa Tenggara Mataram
5. West Kalimantan Pontianak Sambas
6. Jambi Jambi
7. Papua Javaoura
8. East Java Suraba a Madiun
9. North Sumatra Medan Deli Serdang
10. West Java Bandune C irebon
II. Riau Pekanbaru Indragiri hulu
12. East Kalimantan Samarinda
13. Central Java Semarang
14. Bali Denoasar
15. South Sulawesi Makassar Mares
16. Lampung Bandar lamoune
51
Rural area includes selected sub-districts (Kecamatan) within the Regency
(Kab upaten). The selected Regencies are as follows: North Minahasa of Sulawesi,
Sambas in West Kalimatan, Madiun in East Java, Deli Serdang in North Sumatra,
Cirebon in West Java, Indragiri Hulu in Riau and Maros in South Sulawesi. Survey
of Boarding houses was also conducted in 7 selected cities (Jakarta, Yogyakarta,
Surabaya, Pontianak, Medan and Makassar).
Survey Methodology. To derive estimate of prevalence of drug abuse in the

community, two types of surveys were conducted: one on household survey covering
members of the household population and the other is a survey of boarding houses
covering special groups in the community, mainly high school and university
students and workplace employees.
The survey was supported by qualitative study using in-depth interview of three
groups of informants: drug users (with 2 respondents per city of 16 cities), parents of
drug users (with 2 respondents per city of 16 cities), and police officials (I police
chief in 16 cities and 7 villages).
Through survey, data on knowledge on drug abuse and HIV/AIDS and its prevention
were collected. From the drug users as informants, background data of drug user,
including types of drugs used, methods of drug use, and treatment history were
gathered. From parents of drug users, information on the history of drug use, actions
taken and social and economic losses within the household were determined. From
police officers as informants, information regarding drug trafficking was derived
Population survey and Sampling Methods.
There were two types of study population: regular households and special
households. In both populations, eligible respondents were of ages 10-60 years. The
number of respondents and the sampling methods for both populations differ because
of their different characteristics (Table 2).
Table 2. Sampling Methods of Household and Boarding Houses Survey
No. Items Household Boardina bouse

I. Sampling design Clusters 3 stages Purposive; Location
(Regency/city; village; Mapping based on sentinel
neighborhood
2. Target Household members ages Boarders
10·60
3. Sample size 200 household; I household 500 respondents derived
with 2-3 respondents from I 00·120 boarding
houses
4. Procedure in the In each selected household, In each boarding house,
selection of 2-3 household members respondents to be selected at
respondents ages I 0·60 to be random sampling
interviewed.
52
In the household survey, the sample design was a multi-stage area probability
sample. The basic plan involved three cluster stages, with cluster as primary
sampling unit, based on the size of the population in every village (kelurahan). The
sampling frame was derived from the Bureau of Statistics Center. Within the selected
cluster (kelurahan), two (2) neighborhood units (Rukun Tetangga/RT) were selected
through simple random sampling. Within the selected neighborhood (RT), ten (10)
households were selected through systematic random sampling with one or two
eligible residents (if any) within these households. Hence, the total sample size was
I 0 clusters • 2 neighborhoods (RT) • I 0 households= 200 households. It is assumed
that the average number of household members is four (4), hence, a total of 800
individuals as respondents in every Regency (kabubaten)/city (kota). With this total
number of respondents selected through random sampling procedure, errors of
prevalence estimates of less than 10% is assured at 90% level.
In the boarding house survey, samples were taken through purposive random
sampling. Listing of boarding houses within the schools or educational institution
and workplace including recreational places was undertaken to identify the location
and total number of boarders. The sentinel approach was used. Mapping of
boarding houses per city location was done as a framework to get samples of
boarders as respondents through probability proportional to size method and
systematic sampling. After all data had been taken and the proportion per sentinel
had been made, selection of respondents in every boarding house was done through
random sampling.
After selection, respondents were interviewed in person in their homes by trained

interviewers, using structured questionnaire.
The questionnaire for household survey consisted offive parts: (I) Identification and
control; (2) List of household members; (3) Household social-economic situation; (4)
Respondents demographic data; (5) Prevalence of illicit drug use in the lifetime, in
the past year, and in the past month, including frequency of use, dosage per use,
method/s of use and drug treatment experience.
The drugs examined were :

cigarettes.
alcohol.
mushrooms (kecubung).
inhalants (aica, aibon, uhu).
barbiturates (luminal, nipam, BK, mogadon).
benzodiazepam (valium, lexotan).
ganja (marijuana).
methamphetamine (shabu).
ecstasy.
cocaine.
53
SURVEY FINDINGS
Number of Household Respondents interviewed
A total of 4,355 households with a total of 20,302 household members or an average

of 4.7 persons per household were listed and screened. Out of these total household
members, 15,604 respondents or 77% met the requirements as respondents (aged I 0-
60 years old). Out of these eligible respondents, 11 ,053 respondents or 71% were
successfull y interviewed (Table 3).
Table 3. Number of Household Respondents, 2005
Citv ViUue Total

Number of Respondents Listed 14247 6055 20302
Number of listed eligible 77.3 75.9 76.9
respondents 55.9 51.7 54.6
Number of respondents to be
interviewed
Actual Number of Respondents 7959 3128 11087
interviewed
Table 3-A. Total Number of Household and Boarding House

Respondents Interviewed
Household Boardin2 House

Total Household 4.355 600
Male & Female II 053 3 008
-Male 5168 1,611
-Female 5885 1.397
Boarding House Respondents . Mapping of boarding houses recorded 3,653

boarding houses with 27,380 residents. From this total, a sample of 600 boarding
houses was chosen with 3,008 residents distributed in 6 cities (Table 4).
Table 4. Distribution of Boarding House Respondents, by background

characteristics, 2005
Percent
Total Number of BoardiM Houses 600
Location
Campus 59.0
Industry/Factory 11.5
Office 8.7
Market 9.0
Recreational places 11.8
Gender
Male 30.5
Female 29.8
Male & Female 39.7
54
Demographic Characteristics of Respondents
There were more female respondents in the household survey, both city and rural
areas (53% female and 47% male). Conversely, there were more males (54%) than
females in the boarding house survey. More than 50% of household survey
respondents (56%) were aged 30 years old and above while respondents of the
boarding house survey were younger with 77.3% aged 20-29 years old. Educational
level of respondents in the boarding house survey was far much higher (more than
90% of both female and female were senior high school graduates or above) than in
the household survey with only 47%. Majority (63.8%) of the boarding house
survey respondents were students while 48% of household respondents were
employed, with almost 18% students. Only 26.6% of the household respondents and
8.5% of boarding house respondents had a monthly income of more than 1,500,000
rupiah (US$ I ~ Rp.9,500).
Table 5. Number ofHouseho1d and Boarding House Respondents Interviewed

by Gender and Demographic Characteristics: 2005
Household Boardlna House

Demoerapblc Characteristics
Male Female M+F Male Female M+F
TOTAL RESPONDENTS 5168 5885 11053 1611 1387 2998
AGE GROUP
J0-\9years 21.4 19.6 20.4 14.0 21.1 17.3
20-29 years 22.0 25.1 23.6 78.4 76.1 77.3
>30years 56.6 55.4 56.0 7.6 2.8 5.4
EDUCATION
Elementary grade graduate 28.2 33.8 31.2 2.5 1.4 2.0
Junior High school graduate 2 1.9 21.7 2 1. 8 4.1 2.1 3.2
Senior Hi~ school ~raduate + 49.9 44.5 47.0 93.4 96.5 94.8
CURRENT EMPLOYMENT
Employed 70.6.1 28.8 48.3 32.6 25.1 29.2
Students (High SchooV 19 16.8 17.9 61.1 67.1 63.8
University) 10.3 54 .4 33.8 6.3 7.8 7.0
Unem Joyed
N 5049 5718 10767 824 595 1419
MONTHLY INCOME
< 500,000 rupiah 13.6 14.2 14.3 35.0 36.0 35.4
Between 500,000-1 ,500,000 Rp. 58.0 57.3 59.2 57.4 54.3 56.1
> I ,500,000 rupiah 26.1 25.7 26.6 7.6 9.7 8.5
3Number of respondents who were willing to answer the question
55
Prevalence of Drug Abuse in Indonesia, 2005
The 2005 national household survey indicated that the prevalence drug use among
board ing house residents was 13. 1% which was signi ficantly much hi gher than the
household (2.8%). Some 0.9% of the household population reported having used in
the past year and 0.4 percent in the past month. Among the boarding house
population, 5.2 percent reported having used drugs in the past year and 2.1% in the
past month.
The drug use prevalence among males was significantl y much higher (4.6%)
compared to females (0.4%). The prevalence of drug use o f household population in
the city reporting having ever used illicit drugs was higher (2.8%) than in the village
(1.3%)(Table 6).
Table 6. Preva lence of Drug Abuse by individuals in their lifetime, the past
year, and the past month, by household (city and village) and boarding bouse,
and gender.
Prevlleaee
Lifetime Put Year Past month
I' M&l' M F M&l' M&f
Household 5.4 0.5 2.8 1.6 0.2 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.4
I (City)
I ~i~~::.~ld
2.6 0.2 1.3 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.7 0.1 0.4
Board ing 18.1 7.3 13.1 6.4 3.9 5.2 2.9 1.2 2.1
House
Age group 20-29 had the highest prevalence of illicit drug use for both members of
the household population and boarding house residents. For members of the
household population aged 10-60, age group 20-29 was the most likely to have ever
used illicit drugs (5. 1%) and 14.3% among boarding house residents {Table 7).
Table 7. Prevalence of Drug Abuse by individuals in their lifetime, the past

year, a nd the past month, by household and boarding house, aged 10 to 60
let • ear Past moath
Ovra
Household
:z.
S.:.~~.':l
1.1
Houselaold Boanllac
boose
5.2
Household
0.4
a::::a2.1
Age Group
10- 19 1.2 8.9 0.8 3.3 0.6 1.4
20-29 5.1 14.3 1.8 5.9 0.9 2.3
30 > 1.7 9.9 0.3 2.5 0.2 1.2
Location
City 2.8 0.9 0.4
Rural area 1.3 0.5 0.4
Campus 13.4 5.7 2.3
Industry 3.8 1.8 0.8
Office 14.6 5.5 1.2
Market 11 .0 0.5 0.5
Recreational 24.0 9.6 3.8
laces
56
Table 8. Prevalence of Drug Use among households and boarding house
residents Lifetime, by location, gender, education, employment and age group,
2005
·.~ .
,. ... ,." ... " ,"
T• .• . .• .
... " ," .... ...
T• T•
L""atioa
,.. ... ...
Cit
Lac:a tioa
..• ll.l
8.1
•.o
" 20
0.<
0.> 00
c~ 13.1 21.9 2B_6 • .0 00 00

'"'~
20.5
50 "O.l
0.0
" 2.9 0 .0 0.0 10.0
1."""' 16.7 22.8 22.2

,, 22.3
0.0
"
19.S
21.1 ,, 11.3
20.7
,,
... O.l •. ... ,,
0.0
29 1.2
0.0
0.2 ... 0 .•
0.0
o.•
0.<
14.3
16.1
,,
0.1
00
0.0
1.1
o.• 0.0 27.3 20.0 24.1
l .O
Em 1o
,. "
m~nl
• .1 12.2
,,
0.8 O.l 0.9 0.0 O.l 13.2
" 10.0
Students(High
Schooi/Univ
'·''' ''
IU
22 .0
l2
20.0
IH
20.2 ...
50 2.1
00
22 II 25 .0
Pontianak in West Kalimantan had the highest prevalence rate of illicit drug use in a
lifetime (29.7%), followed by Yogyakarta (14%), Jakarta (12%), Medan (8.6%),
Surabaya (7.6%) and Makassar (6.8%) (Table 9).
Table 9. Prevalence of Drug Abuse by boa rding house population during their
lifetime, the past year, and during the past month, by gender and
loca tion of study
Li(etime Past Year Past Month

Male Female M/F Male Female M/F Male Female M/F
Boarding 18.1 7.3 13.1 6.4 3.9 5.2 2.9 1.2 2.1
House
Jakarta 19.8 3.4 12 .0 11.5 2.1 7.0 7.3 0.8 4.2
Yo~yakarta 22.9 1.4 14.0 3. 1 t.O 2.2 0.3 0 .0 0.2
Pomianak 30.5 28.9 29.7 10.7 15.0 13 .0 0.9 3.4 2.2
Suraba a 11.8 3.3 7.6 3.9 1. 6 2.8 2.0 1.6 1.8
Medan 14.0 1.8 8.6 7.9 1.4 5.0 5.7 0.5 3.4
Makassar 11.4 0.5 6.8 2.4 0.0 1.4 t.O 0.0 0.6
Percentage Reporting Illicit Drug Use.

Ganja was the most commonly used illicit drug (Table I 0). Eighty-five percent of
members of the household population had ever used it during their lifetime, while
24.9 percent had used it in the past year. This is also true among boarding house
resident wherein 83 .9 percent had reported having ever used ganja in their lifetime
and 28.6 percent in the past year.
57
Some 32.1 percent of the household population had ever used ecstasy during their
lifetime and 9.6 percent in the past year whi le 23.1 percent of boarding house
residents had ever used ecstasy during their lifetime and 37.1 percent in the past year,
indicating increased used of ecstasy in the past year.
Methamphetamine was reported by some 28.9 percent having used it in their
lifetimes and 8.8 percent in the past year among household population while 26.6
percent of the boarding house population reported having ever used
methamphetamine in their lifetime and 24.5% in the past year.
Barbiturates was reported by some 20.9 percent having ever used barbiturates in their
lifetime and 2.8 percent in the past year. Heroin was reported by 12.9 percent having
ever used heroin in their lifetimes and 6.0 percent in the past year. Some 10.8
percent had ever used benzodiazepine in their lifetime and 1.2 percent in the past
year. Use of other drugs was less common and these other illicit drugs were used by
less than 2 percent of the household population in the past year.
Table 10. Percentage reporting use of illicit drugs in Indonesia among

Household Population, and Boarding House population, aged 10-60: 2005
lifetime and past year prevalence.
Boarding
Cily Village Household
house
N 212 37 249 384
Types of Dru2.s ever used
Mechamphecime Shabu 30.2 21.6 28.90 26.6
MDMAEcstasv 34.0 21.6 32.1 27.3
Heroin Putauw 14.2 5.4 12.9 13.3
oan·a 84.9 86.5 85.1 83.9
Morphine 2.4 0.0 2.0 1.6
Benzodiaze ine 11 .8 2.7 10.4 7.3
Barbiturates 22.6 10.8 20.9 8.3
Cocaine 1.4 0.0 1.2 1.0
LSD 1.4 0.0 1.2 0.5
Kecubun~?;, mushroom 8.5 5.4 8.0 2.6
Others 4.2 0.0 3.6 2.1
Types of Drugs used in the past year
Methamphetime Shabu 9.9 2.7 8.8 24.5
MDMA Ecstasy 11.3 0.0 9.6 37.1
Heroin Putauw 7.1 0.0 6.0 11.8
Gan·a 23.6 32.4 24.9 28.6
Morphine 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3
Cocaine 1.4 0.0 1.2 25.0
LSD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kecubun11;, mushroom 2.8 0.0 2.4 0.0
Others 0.5 0.0 0.4 12.5
4
Total number of respondents who had used drugs
' More than one answer
58
Table 11. Percentage of illicit drug use in Indonesian Household Population
and Boarding House Population, Aged 10 to 60: 2005 Lifetime, Past Year, and
Past Month Prevalence, by Gender and Survey Location
. .....
Liftfi- Paoi Yflr PISI Monlh
Mil' . .... MIF Ftmale
""
..•
Mi lt Pt1111k F-•le
H o-~old Po p.ia Ci o.s u 0. 2 0.9 0.9 0. > 0.6
60 ) .0 u >.9 0.1 O.> 06
...
2.2
'""'"
II.~
~okoru 6.)
........
0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.0
" "
....
0.9 0.9 0.9
u
0.0
u
0.0 00
" " "
) .0
" " "
..
00 0.0 0.1
~
u .., 0.0
"""""' 6.0 ).6 0.9
u " " "
0)
0.)
"u
0.) 02 06
"
,·~·
"~
...... 2.9 0.6
" 0.0 0.0 0.0
" 00
.
0.6 00
6.2 0.6
,,
2> 0.6 0.6 00 00
....""'"'
~
11.7
11.7
6.>
>.2
00
0) 22
2.2
''
2.6
0.0
00
0.0
))
0.6
u
'·'
"''
0.0
0.0
0.0
26
00
0.2
'""'""' .., u
..,
0.6
Somarillda
,_.,
0.6 2.S
" 00 0.1
"
=-....
0.6 0.0 0.0 00
H
"u '' " 0.6
25
2.9
" 0.1 2.>
" 0.1
00
0.0
" ".., " 00
"" 0.0
0.2
~.
ll e-HidPep. l• rlot Villo t "2.6

00
0.2
l.6
u " "
0.> ,
O>
0. 2
0.0
0. > 0.6
0.9 0.9 0.2 0.0 OS 0.2
MlnalwaUtan 0.9
" OS
0.0
S.m"" 00 0.0 00
" 0.0 0.0
"
0.0
0.0
0.0
Madiun
O.liSer
26
ll.S
0.0
0.0
l.2
>O "'·' 00
00
03
2.6
00
6. > 0.0 u
Cin:bon
'... _"riHilir
0.6
.,
"
0.0
0.6
00
0.2
l.O
0.>
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
"
0.0
00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
Among all members of the household population, both in city and village, males
were significantly more li kely than femal es to have ever used illicit drugs (5 .4% in
the city and 2.6% in the vi llage), to have used illicit drugs in the past year (1.6% and
1.0% respectively) and in the past month (0.9% and 0.7% respectively).
City residents were generally more likely than residents in the villages or rural areas
to have ever used illicit drugs (2.8%) or to have used it in the past year (0.9%) or past
month (0.4%) (Table II ). Jakarta had the hi ghest prevalence of illicit drug use for
lifetime (6.0%), followed by Medan (5.7%), Bandung (4.8%), Yogyakarta (4.3%),
Pontianak (3.6%), Semarang (3. 5%), Denpasar (2.9%), Pekanbaru (2.2%) and 2. 1%
for Surabaya and Jambi .
Percentage of village residents who had ever used illicit drugs was 1.3%, had used
drugs in the past (0.5%) or in the past (0.4%). However, Deli Serdang, a rural area in
North Sumatra reported 5.0% of illicit drug use fo r lifetime, some 2.4 percent in the
past year and some 1.8 percent in past month (Table II ).
59
Table 11 . Prevalence of Tobacco use Among Household and Boarding House
Populations, by Age and Gender, 2005.
Household memben Boarding House Population

Age/Gender
Smokin2 NotSmokin2 Smokin2 NotSmokinR
10-19 10.4 0.3 25.5 2.5
Male 10.7 0.4 22.9 2.9
Female 6.3 0.3 37.0 2.4
20-29 15.5 0.7 30.2 2.9
Male 15.1 2.4 28.3 4.9
Female 22.9 0.3 39.4 1.9
30 years+ 4.8 0.5 13.5 4.0
Male 5.0 1.1 10.6 8.7
Female 2.5 0.2 40.0 0.0
Cigarette use among boarding house population was significantly much higher than
the household population (Table II). Age group 20-29 had the highest prevalence of
alcohol use (30.2%), followed by age group 10-19 with 25.5% among the boarding
house population. It is interesting to note that females in age group 30 years above
among the boarding house population had significant prevalence rate (40.0%) as
compared to male (10.6%).
Among household population, age group 20-29 also had the highest prevalence of
drug use with 15.5%. Females had higher prevalence of alcohol use (22.9%) than
males (15.1 %) in thi s particular age group.
Table 12. Prevalence of Alcohol use Among Household and Boarding House
Populations, by Age and Gender, 2005.
Household memben Boardin2 House Population

Age/Gender Alcohol Non Alcohol Non Alcohol
Alcohol Use
Use Use Use
10-19 18.9 0.2 23.4 2.1
Male 19.8 0.4 24.2 1.0
Female 15.4 0.0 21.3 2.6
20-29 22.0 1.4 30.2 4.1
Male 21.2 0.1 31.4 5.8
Female 21.9 0.5 26.3 3.1
30 years+ 7.1 0.5 19.2 2.5
Male 7.4 0.9 16.7 2.0
Female 3.4 0.2 42.9 3.3
60
Alcohol use among boarding house population is much higher than the household
population (Table 12). Age group 20-29 generally had the hi ghest prevalence of
alcohol use. Among the boarding house population age group 20-29 had the highest
prevalence of alcohol use (30.2%), followed by age group 10-19 (23.4%) and 30
years + with 19.2 percent. It is interesting to note that females in age group 30
years above among the boarding house population had significant prevalence rate of
alcohol use (42.9%) as compared to male (16.7%).
Among household population, age group 20-29 also had the hi ghest prevalence of
alcohol use with 22.0% followed by age group 10-19.
Table 13. Prevalence of Cigarette and Alcohol use among Household and
Boarding House Population, in their Lifetime, in the Past Year and in Past
Month, by Age, Gender, Education and Employment, 2005
Household Board in House

Lifetime Past Past Lifellme Past Past
Year Month Year Month
ofCi areneUse 28.8
i
36.2 28.1 56.4 43.4 42.3
16.0 10.1 9.9 44.4 29.0 28.0

3.3 32.3 31.3 57.8 44.9 43.8
42.4 34. 1 33 .3 74. 1 67.9 67.3
Gender
Male 68.9 57.3 56. 1 8 1.3 67.5 66.0
Female 7.6 3.8 3.5 27.5 15.4 14.8
Education
Elementarv 2rnd. 32.0 26.9 26.3 68.9 55.7 55.7
Junior H.S 2rad. 32.9 26.6 26.0 70.5 65.3 64.2
Senior H.S uad. + 40.6 31.1 30.2 55.6 42.4 41.3
Em lo ment
Em lo ed 57.5 48.2 47.1 6 1.4 50.6 49.9
~~~:"~~~~~
17.3 10.8 10.3 53.5 39.0 37.9
Unem lOVi:d 16.0 10.7 10.3 63.5 55.3 53.8

Prevalence of Alcohol Use 32. 1 13 .9 4.9 6 1.4 50.6 49.9
Ae.e Grouo
10-19 6. 1 3.4 0.6 32.2 19.9 6.2
20-29 22.3 11.8 3.9 40.3 26.2 7.9
30+ 20.5 7.7 3. 1 46.9 24.1 8.6
Gender
Male 35.1 15.5 5.5 56.1 37.4 11.8
Female 3.0 1.1 0.4 19.6 10.7 2.8
Education
~~d.
13 .0 4.9 2.1 36.1 18.0 4.9
so;ad, 16.2 7.2 2.7 42.1 25.3 5.3
~ .+ 22.1 10.0 3.3 39.2 25.2 7.8
EnmlOVment
EitlOiOVed 29.6 12.4 4.7 38.0 22.9 7.7
~~:"~~~~:?
7.5 4.1 1.1 39.3 25.4 8.0
Unem lo ed 7.0 3. 1 0.9 46.6 32.2 4.8
61
Table 11 indicates the prevalence of cigarette use and alcohol use among household
and boarding house population in their lifetime, in the past year and in past month,
2005.
Cigarette and alcohol use among boarding house population were significantly much
higher than the household population, in their lifetime, in the past year and in the past
month.
Prevalence of cigarette use among boarding house population in their lifetime was
56.4%, 43.4 percent in the past year, and 42.3 percent in past month. Among
household population, the prevalence of cigarette use was 36.2 in their lifetime, 28.8
percent in the past year and 28.1 percent in the past month.
Age group 30+ had the highest prevalence rate with 74.1 percent among boarding
house population in their lifetime and 42.4 percent among household population.
Males among boarding house population had significantly higher prevalence (81.3
%) in their lifetime than their male counterparts in the household population (68.9%).
The employed among the household population had higher prevalence of cigarette
use (57.5%) in their lifetime while the unemployed group among the boarding house
population had slightly higher prevalence (63.5%).
Prevalence of alcohol use among the boarding house population was much higher
(61.4%) than among the household population (32.1%) in their lifetime. Prevalence
of alcohol use among boarding house population in their lifetime was 61.4 percent,
50.6 percent in the past year, and 49.9% in past month. Prevalence of alcohol use
among household population was 32.1 percent in their lifetime, 13.9 percent in the
past year and 4.9 percent in past month. More household population who are
employed had ever used alcohol in their lifetim(29.6%). while more boarding house
population who were unemployed had ever used alcohol in their lifetime (46.6%).
Prevalence of Illicit Drugs, Cigarette and Alcohol use, 2005.
Lifetime Paat year Pa.tmonth
I-+- Illicit drugs - - - A.lcollol Clgareuej
62
Boarding house Population
60
56.4
50
43.3 42 .3
40
30
~
20
~
10
o43...1
Ufetime
- <
-----------Past--.month
;2
1-+- lllk:lt Drugs - Alcohol Cigarette I
63
ANNEX9. UST OF PROVINCES REPORTING DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT
AND REHABILITATION DATA 2003 • 2006
YEAR
NO. PROVINCE INSTITUTION
2003 2004 lOGS 2006
4 5 6 7
DKI Jakarta • Dru ndency Hospital ./ ./ ./ ./
- RS Dr. Cipto Mana,wtkusumo ./
- RS Fatmawati ./ ./ ./
- RS Pondok lndah ./ ./ ./
·RSHusada ./ ./
- RS St. Carolus ./ ./
- RS Duren Sawit ./ ./
• RS Penahabatan ./ ./ ./
- RS Bhayangkara ./
- RSJ Soehato Heml'an ./ ./
- RSJ Dharmaiava ./
- Kamoumt Bali H.C. ./ ./
- Tambora health Center ./
- PasarMin H.C. ./ ./ ./
- TebetH.C. ./ ./
- Puskesmas Jakbar ./
- Puskesmas Jakse\ ./
- Pamardisiwi T.C. ./ ./ ./ ./
- Yavasan Rumah Anak Panah ./ ./
- Vavasan Darullchsan ./ ./
- Ya awan Terracotta ./ ./
- Yayasan Tulus Hati ./ ./
- Yayasan Purl Elok Teratai ./ ./
- Yavasan Asa Barutsa ./ ./
- Yavasan Dian Krida Utama ./ ./
- Yavasan AI-Jahu ./ ./
- Ya asan Doulous ./ ./
- Yayasan Kasih Mulia ./ ./
- Yayasan Karya Bhakti ./ ./
- Yayasan Pelkesi ./ ./
- P112Uvuban Asuhan Naoza ./ ./
- Wisma Adiksi ./ ./
- WismaAifiat ./ ./
- Rumah Harapan dan Pemulihan ./ ./
Bethesda
- Getsemani ./ ./
- Yayasan Pelita llmu ./ ./
- Kios lnformasi Atmaiava ./ ./ ./
- Directorate PRSKN, Dept. ./ ./
Social Welfare
- Directorate Bina Khusus ./ ./
Narkotika
- Ci inan2 ./ ./
- Sanatorium Dharmawan2sa ./ ./
*This list of ATS drugs abuse network is combination of MOH data plus BNN data
64
J s
"'"' "'"' "'

2. West Java • RS Dr. Hasan Sadikin
- RSJ Marzuki Mahdi
- RSJBanduW
"' "' "'
- Galih Pakuan R.C.
- LP Banceuv "'"' "'"' "'"'
- LP Cirebon
"' "' "'
- RSJ Cimahi
"'
3. Centra\ Java
-
-
Dinas Kesehatan Kota Bandun
RS Dr. Kariadi
"' "'"' "'"'
- RSJ Am inoG
"'
- RSJ Sud·arwadi
"'
- RSJ Menur
"'
- RSJ Surakarta
"' "'
- RSJ Prof. Dr. Soerovo
"' "' "'
- RSJ Dr. Radjiman
Wediodinin~rat "' "'
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semaran
"'
- Nusakambane.an
"'
4. East Java - RSJ Menur
"' "'
- Pondok Pesantren SurviliVa
"' "' "'
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Suraba a
"' "' "'
- Madiun
"' "'
5. Yogyakarta
- Pamekasan
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota "'
"'
"'
"'
"'
Yogyakarta
- LP Yo2vakarta
"' "'
6. Banten - RSUD Kab SeraliP
"'
"'"'
- RSUD Tan eran
- Pamulang H.C.
"'
- KemiriH.C.
"'
- PP Khusnul Khotimah
"' "'
- Pondok Pesantren Hikmah
Sva'adah "'
- LP Pemuda Kelas II
"' "'
- LP Tan~eranrr
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Serane. "'"'
7. Bali - RS San lah
"' "' "' "'
- RS Wan2ava
"'
- RSJ Bina Atma
- RSJ Bali "' "' "'"' "'
- RSJ Bang\i
"' "'
- Yayasan Kesehatan Ban li
"' "'
• Yavasan Bali Nurani
"' "'
· Dinas Kesehatan Kota DeflPasar
"' "'
• LPBamdi
"' "' "' "'
· LP Kerobokan
"' "'
8. South Sumatra - RS Dr. Moh. Hoesin
"' "' "'
- RS Dr. Emaldi B
"'
- RSCharitas
"'
- RS Siti Chadi' ah
"'
-
-
RS Muhammad ah
RS Pusri "'"'
65
- RS Pertamina ./
- RSJ Palemban2 ./
- Yavasan Ar-Rahman ./
- Ya asan A l-lchlas ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota ./ ./
Palemban"
9. West Sumatra - RS Dr. M. Jamil ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pad3nQ ./
- LP Lubuk Lin 1H~au ./
- LP Padan ./
10. North Sumatra - PP lnsyafR.C. ./ ./ ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Medan ./
- LP Pematam1: Siantar ./ ./
II. South Sulawesi - RS Dr. Wahidin, Makassar ./ ./
- RSDadi ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Makassar ./
- LPMaros ./ ./
12. Southeast - RSJ Kendari ./
Sulawesi
13. North Sulawesi - Dinas Kesehatan Kota Menado ./
14. South Kalimantan - RS Moch Ansari ./ ./
- RSAtmaH. ./ ./
- RSJ Tamban ./ ./
- Panti N30za PSKW Melati ./ ./
- LP Mart-;pura ./ ./
15. East Kalimantan - Dinas Kesehatan Kota ./
Baliknanan
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota ./
Samarinda
16. West Kalimantan - RSJ Pontianak ./
- Unit Yan T&R UPRS ./ ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Pontianak ./
17. Riau - RS Tamnan ./

18. Bandar Lampun - RS Abdoel Moeloek ./
- RSJ Lamoune. ./
- Dinas Kesehatan Kola Bandar ./ ./
Lamoune.
- LP Bandar Lamnun ./ ./
19. Nangroe Aceh - RSJ Aceh ./
Darussalam
- Dinas Kesehatan Kota Banda ./ ./ ./
Aceh
20. Jambi - RSJJambi ./ ./
21. WestNusaT. - RSJMataram ./ ./ ./ ./
22. Bengkulu - RSJ Bengkulu ./
23. Maluku - RSJ Ambon ./
24. Paoua - LP Javanura ./ ./
TOTAL 24 48 70 18 96
./ - Sent data
66

BK0131 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine Type Stimulants ATS and O

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BK0131 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine Type Stimulants ATS and O

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BK0131 Patterns and Trends of Amphetamine Type Stimulants ATS and O

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PERPUSTAKAAN BNN r

Prof. Paulina G. Padmoboedojo, MA, MPH

A Report from Project: ADIRAS/Ol/F97

National Narcotics Board, Indonesia

) '\ll) II 'V : ....,_..<.,.,...

Amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) trafficking and abuse have increased

In an attempt to deal with the rapid rise in Amphetamine-type Stimulants

Indonesia through the National Narcotics Boards (BNN) is one of the

This report is compiled and written by Professor Paulina G. Padmohoedojo,

Dn. Made Mangku Pastika

4. Demographic Data of Drug users in treatment centers. Drug users in

6. Methods of using Drugs, 2006. Majority were injecting, followed by inhaling

14. Arrests due to heroin trafficking/dealing a nd consumption in 2005 and 2006

18. Methamphetamine seizures. Total methamphetamine seizure indicated an

19. Methamphetamine Seizures by Province. Metropolitan Jakarta consistently

20. Ecstasy seizures 2005-2006. An increasing trend in ecstasy seizures from

Foreword ........................................ ........ .............. .....................

Introduction .................................................................. .......... ...

Injeeting Drug Use 2006 ...................................................... ........... 14

Drug Related Arrest., 2001-2006 ...... ................................................ 14

Seizures of Illicit Drugs, 2000-2006 ... ... ............................................. 33

Table I. Drug Abuse Prevalence Among Indonesian High School and

Table 2. Estimated Total Number of Drug Abusers Among High School

Table 3. Types of Drugs Abused in Past Year, 2006 .... .. .................... .

Table 4. Drug Abuse Prevalence by Individnals in their Lifetime,

Table 5. Percentage Reporting Use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia

Table 7. Distribution of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,

Table 8. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

Table 9. Top Ranking Provinces in Indonesia with the Most Number of

Table I 0. Total Number of Ecstasy Related Arrests in Indonesia,

Table 12. Total Number of Methamphetamine (Shabu) Related Arrests

Table 14. Total Number of Cannabis (Ganja) Related Arrests in Indonesia,

Table 15. Total Number of Heroin Related Arrests in Indonesia,

Table 16. Seizures of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia, 2000-2006 33

Table 17. Seizures of Ganja, ATS and Psychotropic Drugs,

Figure I. Lifetime Prevalence use of Illicit Drugs in Indonesia

Figure 2. Type of Drugs Used, 2003-2006 . 10

Figure 3. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Age Group, 2006. II

Figure 4. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Gender, 2006 . II

Figure 5. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Education Attainment, 2006. 12

Figure 6. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Employment, 2006 . 12

Figure 7. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Marital Status, 2006 12

Figure 8. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Admission status, 2006 . 13

Figure 9. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Type of Drugs used, 2006. 13

Figure 10. Drug Abuser in Indonesia, by Methods of Drug Use, 2006 . 13

Figure II. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrestees in Indonesia,

Figure 12. Total Number of Drug Arrest, by Gender, 2000-2006 . 15

Figure 12-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia

Figure 12-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia

Figure 13. Total Number of Drug Arrest, by Gender, 2000-2006. 16

Figure 14. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

Figure 16. Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests in Indonesia,

Figure 17-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Arrest, by Age, 2005 . .. 18

Figure 17-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Arrest, by Age , 2006 . 18

Figure 18. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrestees in Indonesia,

Figure 19-A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

Figure 19-B. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrest in Indonesia,

Figure 20-A. Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Occupation, 2005 19

Figure 20-B. Illicit Drug Related Arrest, by Occupation, 2006 19

Figure 21 -A. Total Number of Illicit Drug Related Arrests among