Writing A Notice: Name of The Organisation/Institution, Place Notice Date Heading BODY Which Must Include
Writing A Notice: Name of The Organisation/Institution, Place Notice Date Heading BODY Which Must Include
A notice is written in order to inform people or pupils (in a school) about an event or an
activity.
NOTICE
HEADING
1. Event (what?)
2. Date/time/duration (when?)
3. Place/Venue (where?)
Signature
Section:
English grammar
personal pronouns
it and there
you and they
possessive pronouns (see possessives:- pronouns)
this, that, these and those
one and ones
questions
reflexive pronouns
reciprocal pronouns: each other and one another
indefinite pronouns
relative pronouns
His father has just retired. Was a teacher. > He was a teacher.
I’m waiting for my wife. Is late. > She is late.
Look at the time! Is half past two.> It’s half past two.
Go away.
Play it again please.
there
We use there as a dummy subject with part of the verb be followed by a noun
phrase. (see Clauses, sentences and phrases):
It
It’s raining.
It’s a lovely day.
It was getting cold.
• on the telephone:
• when we cannot see them and we ask them for their name:
We use you to talk about people in general including the speaker and the hearer:
You can buy this book anywhere > This book is on sale everywhere.
You can’t park here > Parking is not allowed here.
They don’t let you smoke in here > No smoking here
This is Janet.
These are my friends, John and Michael.
WARNING:
We don’t say These are John and Michael.
We say This is John and this is Michael.
What’s that?
This is our house, and that’s Rebecca’s house over there.
Those are very expensive shoes.
We also use this, these, that and those with nouns to show proximity
… and that and those for people or things that are not near us:
See those two girls? Helen is the tall one and Jane is the short one.
Which is your car, the red one or the blue one?
My trousers are torn. I need some new ones.
See those two girls. Helen is the one on the left.
Let’s look at the photographs. The ones you took in Paris.
• as a direct object when the object is the same as the subject of the verb:
We can use a reflexive pronoun as direct object with most transitive verbs, but these are the
most common:
amuse blame cut dry enjoy help
satisf
hurt introduce kill prepare teach
y
Some verbs change their meaning slightly when they have a reflexive pronoun as direct
object:
We do not use a reflexive pronoun after verbs which describe things people usually do for
themselves, such as wash, shave, dress:
• as the object of a preposition when the object refers to the subject of the clause:
Warning
• with the preposition by when we want to show that someone did something alone and/or
without any help:
We often put the reflexive pronoun at the end of the clause when we are using it for
emphasis:
We use the reciprocal pronouns each other and one another when two or more people do the
same thing. Traditionally, each other refers to two people and one another refers to more
than two people, but this distinction is disappearing in modern English.
We also use the possessive forms each other’s and one another’s:
somebody someone something
everybod
everyone everything
y
We use indefinite pronouns to refer to people or things without saying exactly who or what
they are. We use pronouns ending in -body or -one for people, and pronouns ending in -thing
for things:
Nobody came.
Nothing happened.
We use else after indefinite pronouns to refer to people or things in addition to the ones we
already mentioned.
Subjec
Object Possessive
t
that that
We use who and whom for people, and which for things.
Or we can use that for people or things.
• after a noun, to make it clear which person or thing we are talking about:
My mother, who was born overseas, has always been a great traveller.
Lord Thompson, who is 76, has just retired.
We had fish and chips, which is my favourite meal.
When whom or which have a preposition the preposition can come at the beginning of the
clause...
I had an uncle in Germany, from who[m] I inherited a bit of money.
We bought a chainsaw, with which we cut up all the wood.
Determiners are words which come at the beginning of the noun phrase.
Specific determiners:
We use a specific determiner when we believe the listener/reader knows exactly what we
are referring to:
General determiners:
The general determiners are:
When we are talking about things in general and the listener/reader does not know exactly
what we are referring to, we can use an uncount noun or a plural noun with no
determiner:
… or you can use a singular noun with the indefinite article a or an:
Determiner
We use the general determiner any with a singular noun or an uncount noun when we are
talking about all of those people or things:
It’s very easy. Any child can do it. (= All children can do it)
With a full licence you are allowed to drive any car.
I like beef, lamb, pork - any meat.
We use the general determiner another to talk about an additional person or thing:
Quantifiers
We use quantifiers when we want to give someone information about the number of
something: how much or how many.
We use "which" as a determiner to ask a question about a specific group of people or things:
1. We use the indefinite article, a/an, with count nouns when the hearer/reader does not
know exactly which one we are referring to:
Police have been searching for a 14 year-old girl who has been missing since Friday.
Jenny Brown, a pupil at London Road School, is described as 1.6 metres tall with short
blonde hair.
She was last seen wearing a blue jacket, a blue and white blouse and dark blue jeans and blue
shoes.
Anyone who has information should contact the local police on 0800349781.
3. We do not use an indefinite article with plural nouns and uncount nouns:
She was wearing blue shoes. (= plural noun)
She has short blonde hair. (= uncount noun)
Police have been searching for a 14 year-old girl who has been missing since Friday.
Jenny Brown, a pupil at London Road School, is described as 1.6 metres tall with short
blonde hair.
She was last seen wearing a blue jacket, a blue and white blouse and dark blue jeans and blue
shoes.
Anyone who has information should contact the local police on 0800349781.
My brother is a doctor.
George is a student.
5. We use a/an with a singular noun to say something about all things of that kind:
We use the definite article in front of a noun when we believe the hearer/reader knows
exactly what we are referring to.
We live in a small village next to the church. = (the church in our village)
Look at the boy in the blue shirt over there. = (the boy I am pointing at)
• because we have already mentioned it:
A woman who fell 10 metres from High Peak was lifted to safety by a helicopter. The
woman fell while climbing.
The rescue is the latest in a series of incidents on High Peak. In January last year two
men walking on the peak were killed in a fall.
We also use the definite article:
The wolf is not really a dangerous animal (= Wolves are not really dangerous animals)
The kangaroo is found only in Australia (= Kangaroos are found only in Australia)
The heart pumps blood around the body. (= Hearts pump blood around bodies)
We use the definite article in this way to talk about musical instruments:
Joe plays the piano really well.(= Joe can play any piano)
She is learning the guitar.(= She is learning to play any guitar)
• With adjectives like rich, poor, elderly, unemployed to talk about groups of people:
the United Kingdom; the Kingdom of Nepal; the United States; the People’s Republic
of China.
• countries which have plural nouns as their names:
• geographical features, such as mountain ranges, groups of islands, rivers, seas, oceans and
canals:
the Himalayas; the Canaries; the Atlantic; the Atlantic Ocean; the Amazon; the Panama
Canal.
• newspapers:
the Empire State Building; the Taj Mahal; the Mona Lisa; the Sunflowers
• organisations:
the Ritz; the Ritz Hotel; the King’s Head; the Déjà Vu
*Note: We do not use the definite article if the name of the hotel or restaurant is the
name of the owner, e.g.,Brown’s; Brown’s Hotel; Morel’s; Morel’s Restaurant, etc.
• families:
a lot
all any enough less lots of
of
mor
most no none of some
e
a couple etc
hundreds of thousands of
of .
a
(not) much a bit of
little
And, particularly with abstract nouns such as time, money, trouble, etc:, we often use:
Members of groups
You can put a noun after a quantifier when you are talking about members of a group in
general…
…but if you are talking about a specific group of people or things, use of the … as well
Note that, if we are talking about two people or things we use the quantifiers both, either and
neither:
The supermarket was Both the supermarkets were All the supermarkets were
closed closed. closed
I don’t think the I don’t think either of the I don't think any of the
supermarket was open. supermarkets was open. supermarkets were open
Singular quantifiers:
There was a party in every street. = There were parties in all the streets.
Each child was given a prize. = All the children were given a prize.
There was a prize in each competition. = There were prizes in all the competitions.
We often use every to talk about times like days, weeks and years:
BUT: We do not use a determiner with every and each. We do not say:
Possessives
possessive nouns
possessive adjectives
possessive pronouns
questions
reciprocal pronouns
We use a noun with ’s with a singular noun to show possession:
We are having a party at John’s house.
Michael drove his friend’s car.
We use s’ with a plural noun ending in -s:
This is my parents’ house.
Those are ladies’ shoes.
But we use ’s with other plural nouns:
These are men’s shoes.
Children’s clothes are very expensive.
We can use a possessive instead of a noun phrase to avoid repeating words:
Whose coat is
It’s my wife’s [coat]. > It’s my wife’s.
this?
Can you match these possessive adjectives to the right personal pronouns?
Subjec
Object Possessive Adjective
t
I me
You you
Subjec
Object Possessive Adjective
t
He him
She her
It it
We us
They them
We use possessive adjectives:
• to show something belongs to somebody:
That’s our house.
My car is very old.
• for relations and friends:
My mother is a doctor.
How old is your sister?
• for parts of the body:
He’s broken his arm.
She’s washing her hair.
I need to clean my teeth.
Can you match these possessive pronouns to the right personal pronouns and
possessive adjectives?
yours, mine, theirs, ours, hers, his, its
Subjec
Object Possessive adjectives Possessive pronouns
t
I me my
You you your
He him his
She her her
It it its
We us our
They them their
We can use a possessive pronoun instead of a noun phrase:
Is that John’s car? No, it’s [my car] > No, it’s mine.
We can use possessive pronouns after of.
We can say:
Susan is one of my friends.
or
Susan is a friend of mine.
but not
Susan is a friend of me
or
I am one of Susan's friends.
or
I am a friend of Susan's.
but not
I am a friend of Susan
We use whose to ask questions:
Pattern A Pattern B
We use the reciprocal pronouns each other and one another when two or more people do the
same thing. Traditionally, each other refers to two people and one another refers to more
than two people, but this distinction is disappearing in modern English.
We also use the possessive forms each other’s and one another’s:
Adjectives
-ing adjectives:
-ed adjectives:
Opinion adjectives:
Some adjectives give a general opinion. We can use these adjectives to describe almost any
noun:
wonderfu
awful important nasty
l
Some adjectives give a specific opinion. We only use these adjectives to describe particular
kinds of noun:
Usually we put an adjective that gives an opinion in front of an adjective that is descriptive:
a nice red dress; a silly old man; those horrible yellow curtains
a handsome young man; a big black car; that horrible big dog
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Genera
Specific Colou
l Size Shape Age Nationality Material
opinion r
opinion
Some of the commonest -ed adjectives are normally used only after a link verb:
We say:
north northern
countless eventful
south southern
occasional indoor
east eastern
lone outdoor
west western
We say:
When we want to describe how something or someone changes we can use two
comparatives with and:
We often use the with comparative adjectives to show that one thing depends on another:
Superlative adjectives:
Intensifiers:
(Intermediate)
We use words like very, really and extremely to make adjectives stronger:
exceptionall incredibl
amazingly
y y
remarkabl
particularly unusually
y
We also use enough to say more about an adjective, but enough comes after its adjective:
absolutel utterl
completely totally
y y
exceptionall particularl
really quite
y y
Warning!
(Advanced)
Some intensifiers go with particular adjectives. For example we use the intensifier highly
with the adjectives successful, intelligent, likely and unlikely:
We use the intensifier bitterly with the adjectives disappointed, unhappy and cold:
(Intermediate)
quite a
much far a lot
lot
a great a good a good
a fair bit
deal deal bit
We use much and far as intensifiers with comparative adjectives in front of a noun:
easil by muc
y far h
Adjectives as intensifiers:
(Advanced)
absolut complet
total
e e
perfec
utter real
t
We say:
Mitigators
Mitigators are the opposite of intensifiers. When we want to make an adjective less strong
we use these words:
quite
When we use quite with a strong adjective it means the same as absolutely:
The food was quite awful. = The food was absolutely awful.
As a child he was quite brilliant. = As a child he was absolutely brilliant.
a bit - just a bit - a little - a little bit - just a little bit - rather - slightly
Adjectives as intensifiers:
absolute
total - complete
utter - perfect
real
We say:
He’s a complete idiot.
They were talking utter nonsense.
We often use two nouns together to show that one thing is a part of something else:
the village church; the car door; the kitchen window; the chair leg;
my coat pocket; London residents
Warning
We do not use a possessive form for these things. We do not talk about:
We often use noun modifiers with nouns ending in -er and -ing:
a thirty kilogram suitcase; a two minute rest; a five thousand euro platinum watch; a
fifty kilometre journey;
We often put two nouns together and readers/listeners have work out what they mean. So:
an ice bucket = a bucket to keep ice in
an ice cube = a cube made of ice
an ice breaker = a ship which breaks ice
the ice age = the time when much of the Earth was covered in ice.
Why do we use adverbials?
We use adverbials of manner to say how something happens or how something is done:
Adverbial
He spoke angrily.
They live here.
We will be back soon.
He spoke angrily.
They live just here.
We will go in a few minutes.
If we want to emphasise an adverb of manner we can put it in front of the main verb:
bad > badly; quiet > quietly; recent > recently; sudden > suddenly
But we do not use other adverbials of manner after link verbs. We use adjectives instead:
Location
Examples:
We use adverbials to to talk about the direction where someone or something is moving.
Examples:
Walk past the bank and keep going to the end of the street.
The car door is very small so it’s difficult to get into.
Distance
Examples:
in
beside between by in inside
between
He was standing by the table.
She lives in a village near Glasgow.
You’ll find it in the cupboard.
We use phrases with of as prepositions:
at the back
at the top of at the bottom of at the end of
of
There were some flowers in the middle of the table.
Sign your name here – at the bottom of the page.
I can’t see. You’re standing in front of me.
We can use right as an intensifier with some of these prepositions:
He was standing right next to the table.
There were some flowers right in the middle of the table.
There’s a wood right behind our house.
Direction
We also use prepositional phrases to talk about direction:
acros dow
along back back to into
s n
everywher
here indoors inside nowhere
e
Distance
Adverbials of time
today this week/month/year the day before yesterday the other day/week/month
• We use at with:
clock times: at seven o’clock - at nine thirty - at fifteen hundred hours
mealtimes: at breakfast - at lunchtime - at teatime
• We use in with:
• We use on with:
Note: We say at night when we are talking about all of the night:
but we say in the night when we are talking about a short time during the night:
We use the adverb ago with the past simple to say how long before the time of speaking
something happened:
We use since with the present perfect or the past perfect to say when something started:
alway occasionall
never normally often
s y
We use the adverbial a lot to mean often or frequently. It comes at the end of the clause:
We use how often or ever to ask questions about frequency. How often comes at the
beginning of the clause:
Longer frequency phrases, like every year or three times a day usually come at the end of the
clause:
We use still to show that something continues up to a time in the past present or future. It
goes in front of the main verb:
We use yet in a negative or interrogative clause, usually with perfective aspect (especially in
British English), to show that something has not happened by a particular time. yet comes at
the end of the sentence:
Adverbials of probability
We use adverbials of probability to show how certain we are about something. The most
frequent adverbials of probability are:
Intensifiers:
much - far - a lot - quite a lot - a great deal - a good deal - a good bit - a fair bit
Mitigators:
a bit - just a bit - a little - a little bit - just a little bit - slightly
Intensifiers:
When we intensify a superlative adverb we often use the in front of the adverb, and we use
these words and phrases as intensifiers:
Punctuation
Bracketing Commas
Bracketing commas (also called isolating commas) do a very different job from the other
three types. These are the most frequently used type of comma, and they cause more
problems than the other types put together. The rule is this: a pair of bracketing commas is
used to mark off a weak interruption of the sentence — that is, an interruption which does not
disturb the smooth flow of the sentence. Note that word `pair': bracketing commas, in
principle at least, always occur in pairs, though sometimes one of them is not written, as
explained below. Look carefully at these examples of bracketing commas:
Schliemann, of course, did his digging before modern archaeology was invented.
Pratchett has, it would seem, abandoned Rincewind the wizard to the ravages of the
Discworld.
The Pakistanis, like the Australians before them, have exposed the shortcomings of the
England batting order.
Rupert Brooke, who was killed in the war at the age of 28, was one of our finest poets.
We have been forced to conclude, after careful study of the data, that the proposed
correlations, in spite of their obvious appeal, do not stand up.
In each case a weak interruption has been set off by a pair of bracketing commas. (The last
example has two weak interruptions.) Now notice something important: in every one of these
examples, the weak interruption set off by bracketing commas could, in principle, be
removed from the sentence, and the result would still be a complete sentence that made good
sense. Try this with some of the examples:
Pratchett has abandoned Rincewind the wizard to the ravages of the Discworld.
The Pakistanis have exposed the shortcomings of the England batting order.
We have been forced to conclude that the proposed correlations do not stand up.
This is always the case with bracketing commas, and it gives you a simple way of checking
your punctuation. If you have set off some words with a pair of bracketing commas, and you
find you can't remove those words without destroying the sentence, you have done something
wrong. Here is an example of wrong use, taken from Carey (1958):
If you try to remove the words outside that door, the result is *Yet lay a whole new world,
which is not a sentence. The problem here is that outside that door is not an interruption at
all: it's an essential part of the sentence. So, the bracketing commas shouldn't be there. Just
get rid of them:
*She groped for her cigarettes, and finding them, hastily lit one.
This time, if you try to remove the words and finding them, the result is *She groped for her
cigarettes hastily lit one, which is again not a sentence. The problem is that the interruption in
this sentence is only the sequence finding them; the word and is not part of the interruption,
but an essential part of the sentence. So move the first comma:
She groped for her cigarettes and, finding them, hastily lit one.
Now check that the interruption has been correctly marked off:
This is a good sentence, so you have now got the bracketing commas in the right places.
Since bracketing commas really do confuse many people, let's look at some further examples:
What's wrong here? Well, that comma can't possibly be a listing comma, a joining comma or
a gapping comma; therefore it must be intended as a bracketing comma. But where is the
interruption it is trying to bracket? It can't be the three words at the end: *Stanley was a
determined is so much gibberish. In fact, the weak interruption here is the phrase even
ruthless, and the bracketing commas should show this:
This is perfect, since now the bracketed interruption can be safely removed:
Stanley was a determined figure.
Sometimes this very common type of mistake will not disturb your reader too much, but on
occasion it can be utterly bewildering:
*The Third Partition of Poland was the last, and undoubtedly the most humiliating act in the
sorry decline of the once-powerful kingdom.
Here the sequence before the comma, The Third Partition of Poland was the last, seems to
make sense by itself, but unfortunately not the sense that the writer intends. With only one
comma, the reader will surely assume the writer means `The Third Partition of Poland was
the last [partition of Poland]', will go on to assume that the word undoubtedly begins another
statement, and will be left floundering when she abruptly comes to a full stop instead of a
verb. The essential second bracketing comma removes the problem:
The Third Partition of Poland was the last, and undoubtedly the most humiliating, act in the
sorry decline of the once-powerful kingdom.
The people of Cornwall, who depend upon fishing for their livelihood, are up in arms over
the new EC quotas.
But note carefully: this sentence is talking about all the people of Cornwall, and not just some
of them, and hence so was the original sentence. The weak interruption in the original
sentence is merely adding some extra information about the people of Cornwall. Now
consider this different example:
The people of Cornwall who depend upon fishing for their livelihood are up in arms over the
new EC quotas.
This time their are no bracketing commas because there is no interruption: now we are not
talking about all the people of Cornwall, but only about some of them: specifically, about the
ones who depend upon fishing for their livelihood. Here the phrase who depend upon fishing
for their livelihood is not an interruption but an essential part of the sentence, and hence it
receives no bracketing commas.
Sometimes a weak interruption comes at the beginning or at the end of its sentence. In such a
case, one of the two bracketing commas would logically fall at the beginning or the end of the
sentence — but we never write a comma at the beginning or at the end of a sentence. As a
result, only one of the two bracketing commas is written in this case:
When the weak interruption all in all comes at the beginning of the sentence, it has only a
following comma; when it comes at the end, it has only a preceding comma. Compare what
happens when the interruption comes in the middle:
Now the interruption has two bracketing commas. Regardless of where the interruption is
placed, it could be removed to give the perfectly good sentence I think we can say that we've
done well.
Here are some further examples of weak interruptions that come at the beginning or at the
end.
At the beginning:
Although Mercury is closer to the sun, Venus has the higher surface temperature.
After capturing the Aztec capital, Cortés turned his attention to the Pacific.
Once again, the words set off by a single bracketing comma in these examples could be
removed to leave a good sentence. Check this for yourself.
There are a number of common words which typically introduce weak interruptions
containing complete sentences. Among the commonest of these are although, though, even
though, because, since , after, before, if, when and whenever. Weak interruptions introduced
by these words are usually rather long, and therefore they most often come at the beginning
or at the end of a sentence. Some examples:
Although Australian wines are a fairly new phenomenon, they have already established a
formidable reputation.
After the Roman legions withdrew from Britain, the British found themselves defenceless
against Irish and Viking raids.
If there are any further cuts in funding, our library will be severely affected.
Hitler could never have invaded Britain successfully, because their excellent rail system
would have allowed the British to mass defenders quickly at any beachhead.
Columbus is usually credited with discovering America, even though the Vikings had
preceded him by several centuries.
There is just one case in which you might find yourself apparently following all the rules but
still using bracketing commas wrongly. Consider the following example, and try to decide if
the comma is properly used:
Note that in each of these examples, the material set off by commas could be removed
without destroying the sentence.
The comma in this example is clearly not a listing comma, a joining comma or a gapping
comma. Is it a bracketing comma? Try removing the words before the comma:
The material set off by commas could be removed without destroying the sentence.
This appears to be a good sentence, and so you might think that the original example was
correctly punctuated. But it is not. The problem is that the original sentence was an
instruction to notice something, and the words Note that are therefore an essential part of the
sentence, not part of the interruption. The interruption, quite clearly, consists only of the
words in each of these examples. When we tried to remove the first seven words, we got
something that was a sentence, purely by accident, but a sentence in which the original
meaning had been partly destroyed. The original attempt at punctuating was therefore wrong,
and it must be corrected by adding the second bracketing comma around the interruption:
Note that, in each of these examples, the material set off by commas could be removed
without destroying the sentence.
Now the interruption marked off by the bracketing commas can be safely removed without
wrecking the sense of the sentence:
Note that the material set off by commas could be removed without destroying the
sentence.
Therefore, when you are checking your bracketing commas, make sure that the words
enclosed in commas really do make up an interruption, and do not include an essential part of
the sentence.
In many cases a weak interruption does not absolutely require bracketing commas. Thus
either of the following is fine:
With or without the bracketing comma, this sentence is perfectly clear. Sometimes, however,
the bracketing comma is absolutely essential to avoid misleading the reader:
Here the reader naturally takes Just before unloading the trucks as a single phrase, and is left
floundering as a result. A bracketing comma removes the difficulty:
The best way to avoid problems of this sort is, of course, to read what you've written.
Remember, it is your job to make your meaning clear to the reader. The reader should not
have to struggle to make sense of what you've written.
• Use a pair of bracketing commas to set off a weak interruption which could be removed
from the sentence without destroying it.
• If the interruption comes at the beginning or the end of the sentence, use only one
bracketing comma.