0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views26 pages

CR Zones ZTA Planning Board Worksession Slides

The document discusses proposed changes to the Commercial Residential (CR) zones in Montgomery County. It introduces new neighborhood and town categories for the CR zones, with varying densities, heights, and development methods. The CR Neighborhood zone allows the lowest densities and heights by standard method only. The CR Town and CR Metro zones allow greater densities and heights, utilizing either standard or optional methods. The changes aim to balance compatibility and flexibility through categories tailored to context.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views26 pages

CR Zones ZTA Planning Board Worksession Slides

The document discusses proposed changes to the Commercial Residential (CR) zones in Montgomery County. It introduces new neighborhood and town categories for the CR zones, with varying densities, heights, and development methods. The CR Neighborhood zone allows the lowest densities and heights by standard method only. The CR Town and CR Metro zones allow greater densities and heights, utilizing either standard or optional methods. The changes aim to balance compatibility and flexibility through categories tailored to context.

Uploaded by

Planning Docs
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

CR Zones ZTA

Planning Board Worksession Slides


Introduction of Neighborhood and
Town Categories
January 6, 2011 – March 10, 2011

2/15/2011 1
Background: 12 Months of Conversation &
Counting
 Discussions since PHED  Issues
worksession on Kensington • Parking flexibility
zoning
• Reduced benefits for
 Integration of certain areas
“transitional” area issues
• New benefits for small
during Board’s
lots/low densities
worksessions on Wheaton
• Appropriate uses for
 Incorporation of Takoma
contexts
Park concerns on
revitalization  Opportunities
 Review of sketch plans in • Clarifications of provisions
White Flint • Modifications based on
 Pre-Application meetings “lessons learned”
regarding GSSC properties.
2/15/2011 2
ZTA Steps

 Part 1: Introduction
• Jan 6 – Mar 10 : Board Discussion
• Late March: Council Introduction
 Part 2: Recommendation
• Feb - Mar: Final Staff Examination
 Continued Stakeholder Meetings
 Further Staff Research, Mapping, Modeling
 Staff Recommendation
• Apr – June?: Public Hearings And Worksessions
• June?: Approval of ZTA

2/15/2011 3
CR Zone Categories
 CR Neighborhood (CRN)
• Restricted commercial uses
• Low density & height limits
• No optional method
 CR Town (CRT)
• Some restrictions on commercial uses
• Medium density and height limits
• Standard and optional methods
• Public benefits must equal 50 points in optional method
 CR Metro (CR)
• Existing use table
• Full density and height range
• Standard and optional methods
• Public benefits must equal 100 points in optional method
 Same sequence of factors: CR_# C# R# H#

2/15/2011 4
Category Density & Height Limits
 CRN
• Up to 1.5 FAR and 65 feet
 CRT
• Up to 4.0 FAR and 150 feet
 CR
• Up to 8.0 FAR and 300 feet

9
max 300’ height 8
7
6
FAR

5 Optional Method
max 150’ height Density
4
Standard Method
3
Density
2
max 65’ height
1
0

2/15/2011
CRN CRT CR 5
Density in Context
 Density Range by Categories
• CRN: from 0.5 up to 1.5 FAR
• CRT: from 0.5 up to 4.0 FAR
• CR: from 0.5 up to 8.0 FAR
*Manhattan: 18+ FAR
CR
Full build-out of
R-60 house =
0.875 FAR

CRT

CRN
0.5 FAR
2/15/2011 6
Height in Context
 Height Range by Categories
• CRN: from 40’ up to 65’
• CRT: from 40’ up to 150’
• CR: from 40’ up to 300’
*Manhattan: 1,000’+

CR
Max height of Max height of
R-60 house = R-200 house =
35’ (average 50’ (average
along slope) along slope)
CRT
CRN
40’

2/15/2011 7
Density Averaging
 What can go where
• Uses are governed by map
• Height is governed by map
• Density can move but can’t increase when adjacent to
single-family residential

R-60 CRN1.0 C0.5 R0.5 H45 CRT2.0 C1.5 R1.5 H65

Height may
not exceed Density can move
45’ around but not
exceed 1.0 on any
CRN property

2/15/2011 Uses limited to those allowed by mapped zone 8


Description and Objectives of the CR
Zones
 Establishes general goals regarding environmental,
economic, and social objectives.
 Addresses appropriate densities and heights, which
are functions of the zones.
 Addresses appropriate uses to ensure compatibility,
which is a function of the category.

2/15/2011 9
Definitions Specific to the CR Zones
 New Terms & Modifications
• Add “Applicable Residential Zone” for reference when
addressing restrictions on properties that are adjacent and
confronting certain zones.
• Modify “Cultural Institutions”: add “performance”
establishments.
• Add “Limits of Disturbance” for public use space
requirement for large lots.
• Add “Tenant Footprint” for differentiation between retail
store sizes allowed.

2/15/2011 10
Methods of Development
• CRN
• Standard method only
• CRT
• Standard method up to 1.5 FAR & 65 feet;
• Optional method above w/sketch plan
• CR
• Standard method up to 1.5 FAR & 80 feet;
• Optional method above w/sketch plan
• Site Plan Required in All Zones:
• When adjacent or confronting residential properties and
density of 0.5 FAR or more;
• 10,000sf or more;
• 45 feet or more; or
• 10 or more dwelling units
2/15/2011 11
Site Plan
 Ensuring Compatibility or Requiring Onerous Process?
• Balance sought based on impacts
 Adjacent/confronting residential at 0.5 FAR or more
 > 10,000 sf or 10 units
 > 40’ in height
• Trade-off for higher standard method
 Benefits & sketch plan not required
 MP conformance and public review is required

2/15/2011 12
Standard/Optional Method Thresholds
 No benefits for higher density or revitalization on small
lots and in struggling markets?
• Balance sought based on the lowest amount of density that
ensures flexibility and economic viability
• Reliance on site plan review & CR standards and requirements
 MP conformance
 Building/parking placement & design
 Public use space, landscape, & lighting
 SWM & environmental requirements

2/15/2011 13
Approval Procedures

Zone? CRN

CRT
Standard
or
Method
CR

Density
> 1.5
FAR or H
> 65’
CRT /
80’ CR Optional Method Sketch Plan

2/15/2011 14
Approval Procedures
Adj. To
Res & > No to all:
0.5 FAR
Building
> 10,000 Permit
sf
Standard
Method
> 40’
Site
Plan

≥ 10 units
Yes to any:

2/15/2011 15
Land Uses
 Uses of particular concern: comparison of “edge” zones:

Use C-T C-1 CBD0.5 CRN


Farm & Country Markets Not as “farm products, sale Not as “farm products, sale Not listed L
of” of”
Seasonal Outdoor Sales Not as “Christmas trees, sale Not as “Christmas trees, sale Not listed L
of between 12/5 and 12/25” of between 12/5 and 12/25”
Auto Repairs & Service - P SE/P L
Auto Sales, indoors - - - L
Eating & Drinking Establishments SE P P L
Hotels & Motels - - - L

Personal Living Quarters - P/SE (over 50 units) P/SE (over 50 units) P

Retail Trades ≤ 5,000 SE (as individually listed) P (as individually listed) P P


Retail Trades ≤ 15,000 SE P (as individually listed) P L
Rooftop Mounted Antennas P P P P

2/15/2011 16
Land Uses
 Are Compatibility & Flexibility Mutually Exclusive?
• Site Plan
 CR: Required for any use on property adjacent or confronting
residential > 0.5 FAR, etc.
 CT: Required for any use
 C-1: Not required
 CBD0.5: Required for optional method (above 25 units or 1.0 FAR)
• Master Plan Conformance
• Limited Use Buffer
 100’ for structures, parking, access
 Planted and screened
• Drive-Through Service
 Differentiated only for eating/drinking uses in most zones
 Restricted in all cases in CR
 Site plan required

2/15/2011 17
Land Uses
 CRN
• Permits residential and commercial uses compatible in transitional areas
• Limits uses with greater impacts
• Does not allow more intense uses
 CRT
• Permits residential and greater range of commercial uses
• Limits more intense uses
• Does not allow only most intense uses
 CR
• Existing use table
 Limited Uses
• Restricted to 100 feet from residential properties
• Buffering requirements
 New Uses
• Auto rental services w/storage of vehicles
• Vet with boarding care
• Day care centers split – up to and over 30 users
• Retail uses separated by tenant footprints

2/15/2011 18
Limited Uses
 Transitional
Protections
• Compatibility with
residential
neighborhoods
• 100’ setbacks from
property lines
• Buffering
requirements
• Property access with
mitigation

2/15/2011 19
Master Plan Conformance
 Site plans must be consistent with master plan
 Board may find changes have rendered recommendations no
longer applicable
 Site plans must substantially conform to design guidelines

2/15/2011 20
Streets
 Priority Retail Streets & Streetscape
• Removed
• If one’s design must conform to the master plan and
design guidelines and priority retail streets and
streetscape standards are identified in master plans or
design guidelines, these sections are redundant

2/15/2011 21
Bikes and Showers
 Clarified Relationship with 59-E
 Simplified Table
 Identified #s of Public and Private Spaces

2/15/2011 22
Parking
 Minimums adjusted upward for new contexts
 Some maximum caps removed
 Shared parking facilities for municipalities
retained
 Surface parking design refined
 Site plan required for drive-through services
 Waiver of parking requirements added

2/15/2011 23
Development Standards
 Removed Density and Height: References Section
15.1
 Clarified Setback Language – No Change
 Revised Public Use Space for Small and Large Lots
 Changed Payment-in-Lieu Section
 Clarified Residential Amenity Space Language to
Reflect Change in Workforce Housing Law

2/15/2011 24
Public Use Space
 Same for all contexts
 Public use space for standard method projects:
• Not required for sites under 5,000sf
• 10% of net lot requirement for sites up to 3 acres
• 10% of limits of disturbance for sites over 3 acres
 Pay in lieu for public use space modified with
self-contained language (no reference to section
59-D-2)

2/15/2011 25
Optional Method: Public Benefits
 Reorganized Sections
 Changed from % to Points
 Established Points for CRT
 No Change in CR – 100% = 100 Points; Same Benefits
Available
 Major public facilities expanded to include
infrastructure
 Transit proximity points adjusted for CRT zones
 New public benefits for smaller lots, less intense
development
 Removed 30% Cap; Require 4 out of 7 Categories
 Shifted Some Benefits
 BLTs required only for CR

2/15/2011 26

You might also like