Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions To Address Risks and Opportunities

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/335790924
Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
Method · January 2019

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16261.29928
CITATIONS READS
0 2,632
1 author:
Yousaf Ayub
University of the Punjab
13 PUBLICATIONS 9 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
ISO 17025:2017 Lab Accreditation (Chemical Sector) View project
ISO 9001 Certification View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Yousaf Ayub on 13 September 2019.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Doc:
Actions to Address Risk and Issue Date:1st Jan 2019
Opportunities Rev: 00
Lab System Procedure (LSP)
Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO 17025:2017 – Clause 8.5
Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:
Page 1 of 6
Doc:
Document History
Date Rev # DCR # Section Amendment Detail
Page 2 of 6
Doc:
1. Purpose
This procedure provides guidance to ABC Chemicals (ABC) QC Lab to evaluate and manage risk
relevant to lab processes.
2. Scope
This procedure is applicable on Quality Control Lab
3. Responsibility
Manager Quality Control is responsible for
• Identifying and conducting risk assessment in QC Lab
• Defining control measures of highlighted risks
• Implementation of control measures to manage risk in lab activities
4. Procedure
Risk Assessment is being carried out annually by the Nominated Team person including incharge by
keeping in view the Risk Matrix.
Risks associated with testing activities are identified by the Manager Quality Control, after risk
assessment it enters in the Quality Risk Assessment Form. This document includes the identification
and mitigation plans for risks associated with the defined inspection.
Following steps are followed while conducting risk assessment for inspections & calibration;
i. Identifying the testing process for which the risk most likely dominates
ii. Identifying the risk by allocation value for probability and impact according to table for testing
risks (shown below). These risks may associate to following but not limited to that points:
• Impartiality of testing body
• Confidentiality issues
• Chemist Biasness
• Sales commission on testing
• Nepotism or Financial pressure
• Influence of any interest party
• Any sort of external or internal pressure
• Equipment giving false readings
• Equipment giving unexpected results
• Referral to new customers
Page 3 of 6
Doc:
• Misuse or corruption of reference standards

• Lack of maintenance
iii. While identifying the risk, following questions are considered;
What could happen: what might go wrong, or what might prevent the achievement of the
relevant goals? What events or occurrences could threaten the intended outcomes?
How could it happen: is the risk likely to occur at all or happen again? If so, what could cause
the risk event to recur or contribute to it happening again?
Where could it happen: is the risk likely to occur anywhere or in any environment/place? Or is
it a risk that is dependent on the location, physical area or activity?
Why might it happen: what factors would need to be present for the risk to happen or occur
again? Understanding why a risk might occur or be repeated is important if the risk is to
be managed.
What might be the impact: if the risk were to eventuate, what impact or consequences would
or might this have? Areas of impact to consider include:
iv. Assigning a score to the likelihood (probability of occurrence) of identified risk. Each element is
given a score from 1 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk).
v. Probability is categorized into following categories;
Value Probability Definition
5 Very High At least once in a Day
4 High At least once in week
3 Medium At least once in a month
2 Low At least once in 6 months
1 Very Low At least once in a year or Rarely Occurs
vi. Assigning an Impact rating if the risk were to be encountered; this impact is comprised of
following elements;
• Impact on activities / operations
• Impact on relation with customers, supplier or any other body
• Adverse impact on the reputation of the ABC Chemicals for failure to meet or achieve our
strategic objectives
• Financial consequences
• Compromise compliance of regulations or laws
Page 4 of 6
Doc:
Again, each element is given a score from 1 (lowest risk) to 5 (highest risk).
Value Impact Description

Little/No impact on testing activities or the personnel
1 Very Low
performing the activity
Low Impact due to changes in work environment which may
2 Low
create delays in testing activity
Medium Impact due to changes in work environment (or
3 Medium
equipment) which may lead to ambiguous testing results
High Impact due to personal grievances or pressure on the
personnel performing the test which may lead to
4 High
compromised test results or falsified report ultimately lead to
high financial loss > 500000
Very high Impact due to illegal activity / Bribery case /
5 Very High
compromise/change in report for personal gains
vii. Calculating a final Risk Factor based on the equation:
Risk Factor = Probability Value X Impact Value
The risk is evaluated by plotting the probability value against the impact value as per the matrix
shown above (Risk Assessment Matrix).
Risk Assessment Matrix
Level of Risk
IMPACT
PROBABILITY Very Low Low Medium High Very High
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Very High (5) 5 10 15 20 25
High (4) 4 8 12 16 20
Medium (3) 3 6 9 12 15
Low (2) 2 4 6 8 10
Very Low (1) 1 2 3 4 5
If multiple (Risk= Probability x Impact) of the Probability and Impact is less than 5 risk be rated as “Green”
that means the process is in “Safe limits”. If the multiple of Probability and Impact is less than 10 and
greater than 4 (Yellow) then the “process requires additional control measures” to bring the risk to lower
level. If the risk is greater than 10 (Red) then “Immediate action is required” (including holding the
activity). All findings will be recorded in Risk Assessment Form
viii. When the risks are evaluated, their cause is found out and then the control measures are
suggested and control measures are prioritized according to the magnitude of the risk.
Page 5 of 6
Doc:
ix. When determining controls, or considering changes to existing controls, consideration shall be
given to reduce the risks as;
• Reduce the probability or likelihood of the risk
• Reduce the consequence or impact of the risk
• Share the risk
• Eliminate or avoid it altogether
• Accept or tolerate the risk
x. A risk may be acceptable or tolerable in the following circumstances:
• No treatment is available
• Treatment costs are prohibitive (particularly relevant with lower ranked risks)
• The level of risk is low and does not require using resources to treat it
• The opportunities involved significantly outweigh the threats
xi. The final column allows for entry of an estimated risk factor after mitigation, which is an estimate
on what the risk should be reduced to if the risk treatment is successful.
5. Related Documents
i. Quality Risk Assessment Form
ii. Corrective & Preventive actions
Page 6 of 6
View publication stats

Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions To Address Risks and Opportunities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions To Address Risks and Opportunities

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions To Address Risks and Opportunities

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Lab System Procedure (LSP) Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

Method · January 2019

ISO 17025:2017 Lab Accreditation (Chemical Sector) View project

ISO 9001 Certification View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Lab System Procedure (LSP)

Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities

ISO 17025:2017 – Clause 8.5

Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Date Rev # DCR # Section Amendment Detail

• Misuse or corruption of reference standards

5 Very High At least once in a Day

4 High At least once in week

3 Medium At least once in a month

2 Low At least once in 6 months

1 Very Low At least once in a year or Rarely Occurs

Value Impact Description

You might also like