Introduction To Enhanced Oil Recovery: Lectur - 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

LECTUR_1

Introduction to Enhanced
Oil Recovery

Dr Muayad M. Hasan
Primary oil recovery, secondary oil recovery, and tertiary (enhanced) oil

recovery are terms that are traditionally used in describing hydrocarbons

recovered according to the method of production or the time at which they are

obtained. Primary oil recovery describes the production of hydrocarbons

under the natural driving mechanisms present in the reservoir without

supplementary help from injected fluids such as gas or water. In most cases,

the natural driving mechanism is a relatively inefficient process and results in

a low overall oil recovery. Oil extracted about 20%

The lack of sufficient natural drive in most reservoirs has led to the practice

of supplementing the natural reservoir energy by introducing some form of

artificial drive, the most basic method being the

injection of gas or water. Secondary oil recovery refers to the additional

recovery resulting from the conventional methods of water injection and


‫ﻏﯾر ﻗﺎﺑل ﻟﻼﻣﺗزاج‬ 1
immiscible gas injection. Usually, the selected secondary recovery follows the
‫ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔس اﻟوﻗت‬
primary recovery but may be conducted concurrently with the primary
2
recovery. Water flooding is perhaps the most common method of secondary
3
recovery. However, before undertaking a secondary recovery project it should

be clearly proven that the natural recovery processes are insufficient;

otherwise, there is a risk that the required substantial capital investment may

be wasted.
Oil extracted about (25-30)%

1
Tertiary (enhanced) oil recovery is the additional recovery over and above

what could be recovered by secondary recovery methods. Various methods of

enhanced oil recovery (EOR) are essentially designed to recover oil,

commonly described as residual oil, left in the reservoir after both primary

and secondary recovery methods have been exploited to their respective

economic limits. Figure 1.1 illustrates the concept of the three recovery

categories.

Figure 1.1 Oil recovery categories.

2
Mechanisms of Enhanced Oil Recovery

The terms enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and improved oil recovery (IOR)

have been used loosely and interchangeably at times. IOR is a general term
‫ﯾدل‬
that implies improving oil recovery by any means (e.g., operational strategies,

such as infill drilling, horizontal wells, and improving vertical and areal

sweep). EOR is more specific in concept and it can be considered as a subset

of IOR. EOR implies the process of enhancing oil recovery by reducing oil

saturation below the residual oil saturation “Sor.” The target of EOR varies

considerably by different types of hydrocarbons. Figure 1.2 shows the fluid

saturations and the target of EOR for typical light and heavy oil reservoirs and

tar sand. For light oil reservoirs, EOR is usually applicable after secondary

recovery operations with an EOR target of approximately 45% original oil in

place (OOIP). Heavy oils and tar sands respond poorly to primary and

secondary recovery methods, and the bulk of the production from these types

of reservoirs come from EOR methods.

Figure 1.2 Target for different crude oil systems.

3
Parameters affecting residual oil saturation (Sor)
The magnitude of the reduction and mobilization of residual oil saturation

“Sor” by an EOR process is controlled by two major factors, these are:

• capillary number “Nc”; and

• mobility ratio “M.”

The capillary number is defined as the ratio of viscous force to interfacial

tension force, or

where

μ = viscosity of the displacing fluid

σ = interfacial tension

υ = Darcy velocity

φ = porosity

ko = effective permeability of the displaced fluid, i.e., oil

Δp/L = pressure gradient

4
Figure 1.3 is a schematic representation of the capillary number and the ratio

of residual oil saturation (after conduction of an EOR process to residual oil

saturation before the EOR process). The illustration shows the reduction in

the residual oil saturation with the increase in the capillary number. It is clear

that the capillary number can be increased by:

• increasing the pressure gradient Δp/L;

• increasing the viscosity of the displacing fluid;

• decreasing the interfacial tension between the injection fluid and displaced

fluid.

Figure 1.3 Effect of Nc on residual oil saturation.

The reduction in the interfacial tension between the displacing and displaced

fluid is perhaps the only practical option in reducing residual oil saturation by

increasing capillary number. As shown in Figure 1.3, the capillary number has
5
to exceed the critical capillary number to mobilize residual oil saturation. It

should be noticed that by reducing the interfacial tension to zero, the capillary

number becomes infinite, indicating complete “miscible displacement.”

Another important concept in understanding the displacing mechanism of an

EOR process is the mobility ratio “M.” The mobility ratio is defined as the

ratio of the displacing fluid mobility to that of the displaced fluid, or:

where “k” is the effective permeability and “μ” is the viscosity. The mobility

ratio influences the microscopic (pore-level) and macroscopic (areal and

vertical sweep) displacement efficiencies. A value of M .1 is considered

unfavorable because it indicates that the displacing fluid flows more readily

than the displaced fluid (oil). This unfavorable condition can cause channeling

and by passing of residual oil. Improvement in mobility ratio can be achieved

by increasing the viscosity of the injection fluid, e.g., polymer flood.

Enhanced Oil Recovery Methods


All EOR methods that have been developed are designed to increase the

capillary number as given by Equation (1.1). In general, EOR technologies

can be broadly grouped into the following four categories:

• thermal;
• chemical;
6
• miscible;
• others.
Each of the four categories contains an assortment of injection schemes and a

different variety of injection fluids, as summarized below:

1- Thermal Method
 Steam injection
 Cyclic steam stimulation
 Steam flooding
 Steam-assisted gravity drainage
 In situ combustion
 Forward combustion
 Reverse combustion
 Wet combustion
 Toe-to-Heel Air Injection (THAI)
 Toe-to-heel Air Injection catalytic upgrading process In-situ (THAI-
CAPRI)
2- Chemical Method
 Polymer
 Surfactant slug
 Alkaline
 Micellar
 Alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP)
3- Miscible Method
 CO2 injection
 Lean gas
 N2
 Rich gas
 WAG flood
4- Others
 MEOR
 Foam

7
EOR Methods
As a first step in selecting and implementing an enhanced oil recovery

method, a screening study should be conducted to identify the appropriate

EOR technique and evaluate its applicability to the reservoir. Taber et al.

(1997) proposed screening criteria for enhanced oil recovery methods that

were developed by compiling numerous data from EOR projects around the

world. Based on extensive analysis of the collected data, the authors listed the

optimum reservoir and oil characteristics that are required for implementing a

successful EOR project in a particular field, as shown in Table 1.1. There is a

vast amount of literature on the subject of EOR and its variations, including

excellent reference textbooks by Smith (1966), Willhite (1986), van Poollen

(1980), Lake (1989), Stalkup (1983), and Prats (1983), among others. Brief

description and discussion of someof the listed EOR methods are presented

next.

8
Table 1.1 Summary of Screening Criteria for EOR Methods

You might also like