Introduction To Enhanced Oil Recovery: Lectur - 1
Introduction To Enhanced Oil Recovery: Lectur - 1
Introduction To Enhanced Oil Recovery: Lectur - 1
Introduction to Enhanced
Oil Recovery
Dr Muayad M. Hasan
Primary oil recovery, secondary oil recovery, and tertiary (enhanced) oil
recovered according to the method of production or the time at which they are
supplementary help from injected fluids such as gas or water. In most cases,
The lack of sufficient natural drive in most reservoirs has led to the practice
otherwise, there is a risk that the required substantial capital investment may
be wasted.
Oil extracted about (25-30)%
1
Tertiary (enhanced) oil recovery is the additional recovery over and above
commonly described as residual oil, left in the reservoir after both primary
economic limits. Figure 1.1 illustrates the concept of the three recovery
categories.
2
Mechanisms of Enhanced Oil Recovery
The terms enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and improved oil recovery (IOR)
have been used loosely and interchangeably at times. IOR is a general term
ﯾدل
that implies improving oil recovery by any means (e.g., operational strategies,
such as infill drilling, horizontal wells, and improving vertical and areal
of IOR. EOR implies the process of enhancing oil recovery by reducing oil
saturation below the residual oil saturation “Sor.” The target of EOR varies
saturations and the target of EOR for typical light and heavy oil reservoirs and
tar sand. For light oil reservoirs, EOR is usually applicable after secondary
place (OOIP). Heavy oils and tar sands respond poorly to primary and
secondary recovery methods, and the bulk of the production from these types
3
Parameters affecting residual oil saturation (Sor)
The magnitude of the reduction and mobilization of residual oil saturation
tension force, or
where
σ = interfacial tension
υ = Darcy velocity
φ = porosity
4
Figure 1.3 is a schematic representation of the capillary number and the ratio
saturation before the EOR process). The illustration shows the reduction in
the residual oil saturation with the increase in the capillary number. It is clear
• decreasing the interfacial tension between the injection fluid and displaced
fluid.
The reduction in the interfacial tension between the displacing and displaced
fluid is perhaps the only practical option in reducing residual oil saturation by
increasing capillary number. As shown in Figure 1.3, the capillary number has
5
to exceed the critical capillary number to mobilize residual oil saturation. It
should be noticed that by reducing the interfacial tension to zero, the capillary
EOR process is the mobility ratio “M.” The mobility ratio is defined as the
ratio of the displacing fluid mobility to that of the displaced fluid, or:
where “k” is the effective permeability and “μ” is the viscosity. The mobility
unfavorable because it indicates that the displacing fluid flows more readily
than the displaced fluid (oil). This unfavorable condition can cause channeling
• thermal;
• chemical;
6
• miscible;
• others.
Each of the four categories contains an assortment of injection schemes and a
1- Thermal Method
Steam injection
Cyclic steam stimulation
Steam flooding
Steam-assisted gravity drainage
In situ combustion
Forward combustion
Reverse combustion
Wet combustion
Toe-to-Heel Air Injection (THAI)
Toe-to-heel Air Injection catalytic upgrading process In-situ (THAI-
CAPRI)
2- Chemical Method
Polymer
Surfactant slug
Alkaline
Micellar
Alkaline-surfactant-polymer (ASP)
3- Miscible Method
CO2 injection
Lean gas
N2
Rich gas
WAG flood
4- Others
MEOR
Foam
7
EOR Methods
As a first step in selecting and implementing an enhanced oil recovery
EOR technique and evaluate its applicability to the reservoir. Taber et al.
(1997) proposed screening criteria for enhanced oil recovery methods that
were developed by compiling numerous data from EOR projects around the
world. Based on extensive analysis of the collected data, the authors listed the
optimum reservoir and oil characteristics that are required for implementing a
vast amount of literature on the subject of EOR and its variations, including
(1980), Lake (1989), Stalkup (1983), and Prats (1983), among others. Brief
description and discussion of someof the listed EOR methods are presented
next.
8
Table 1.1 Summary of Screening Criteria for EOR Methods