Scribd
Upload
105 views

Algorithmic Complexity

The document discusses algorithmic complexity and different time complexities of algorithms: - Constant time (O(1)) refers to algorithms that take the same amount of time regardless of input size, like accessing an array element. - Linear time (O(n)) means time grows linearly with input size, like linear search. - Logarithmic time (O(log n)) means time grows logarithmically, like binary search. - Quadratic time (O(n^2)) means time grows quadratically, like selection sort. - Big O notation describes asymptotic upper bounds, while Big Omega describes lower bounds. - Big Theta gives both upper and lower bounds.

Uploaded by

Julius Colminas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
105 views

Algorithmic Complexity

The document discusses algorithmic complexity and different time complexities of algorithms: - Constant time (O(1)) refers to algorithms that take the same amount of time regardless of input size, like accessing an array element. - Linear time (O(n)) means time grows linearly with input size, like linear search. - Logarithmic time (O(log n)) means time grows logarithmically, like binary search. - Quadratic time (O(n^2)) means time grows quadratically, like selection sort. - Big O notation describes asymptotic upper bounds, while Big Omega describes lower bounds. - Big Theta gives both upper and lower bounds.

Uploaded by

Julius Colminas
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Algorithmic Complexity

Introduction
Algorithmic complexity is concerned about how fast or slow particular algorithm
performs. We define complexity as a numerical function T(n) - time versus the input
size n. We want to define time taken by an algorithm without depending on the
implementation details. But you agree that T(n) does depend on the implementation!
A given algorithm will take different amounts of time on the same inputs depending
on such factors as: processor speed; instruction set, disk speed, brand of compiler and
etc. The way around is to estimate efficiency of each algorithm asymptotically. We
will measure time T(n) as the number of elementary "steps" (defined in any way),
provided each such step takes constant time.

Let us consider two classical examples: addition of two integers. We will add two
integers digit by digit (or bit by bit), and this will define a "step" in our computational
model. Therefore, we say that addition of two n-bit integers takes n steps.
Consequently, the total computational time is T(n) = c * n, where c is time taken by
addition of two bits. On different computers, addition of two bits might take different
time, say c1 and c2, thus the addition of two n-bit integers takes T(n) = c1 * n and T(n)
= c2* n respectively. This shows that different machines result in different slopes, but
time T(n) grows linearly as input size increases.

The process of abstracting away details and determining the rate of resource usage in
terms of the input size is one of the fundamental ideas in computer science.

Asymptotic Notations
The goal of computational complexity is to classify algorithms according to their
performances. We will represent the time function T(n) using the "big-O" notation to
express an algorithm runtime complexity. For example, the following statement

T(n) = O(n2)
says that an algorithm has a quadratic time complexity.

Definition of "big Oh"

For any monotonic functions f(n) and g(n) from the positive integers to the positive
integers, we say that f(n) = O(g(n)) when there exist constants c > 0 and n 0 > 0 such
that
f(n) ≤ c * g(n), for all n ≥ n0
Intuitively, this means that function f(n) does not grow faster than g(n), or that
function g(n) is an upper bound for f(n), for all sufficiently large n→∞

Here is a graphic representation of f(n) = O(g(n)) relation:

Examples:

 1 = O(n)
 n = O(n2)
 log(n) = O(n)
 2 n + 1 = O(n)

The "big-O" notation is not symmetric: n = O(n 2) but n2 ≠ O(n).

Exercise. Let us prove n2 + 2 n + 1 = O(n2). We must find such c and n0 that n 2 + 2 n
+ 1 ≤ c*n2. Let n0=1, then for n ≥ 1

1 + 2 n + n2 ≤ n + 2 n + n2 ≤ n2 + 2 n2 + n 2 = 4 n2


Therefore, c = 4.

Constant Time: O(1)

An algorithm is said to run in constant time if it requires the same amount of time
regardless of the input size. Examples:

 array: accessing any element


 fixed-size stack: push and pop methods
 fixed-size queue: enqueue and dequeue methods
Linear Time: O(n)

An algorithm is said to run in linear time if its time execution is directly proportional
to the input size, i.e. time grows linearly as input size increases. Examples:

 array: linear search, traversing, find minimum


 ArrayList: contains method
 queue: contains method

Logarithmic Time: O(log n)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to


the logarithm of the input size. Example:

 binary search

Recall the "twenty questions" game - the task is to guess the value of a hidden number
in an interval. Each time you make a guess, you are told whether your guess is too
high or too low. Twenty questions game imploies a strategy that uses your guess
number to halve the interval size. This is an example of the general problem-solving
method known as binary search:

locate the element a in a sorted (in ascending order) array by first comparing a
with the middle element and then (if they are not equal) dividing the array into
two subarrays; if a is less than the middle element you repeat the whole
procedure in the left subarray, otherwise - in the right subarray. The procedure
repeats until a is found or subarray is a zero dimension.

Note, log(n) < n, when n→∞. Algorithms that run in O(log n) does not use the whole
input.

Quadratic Time: O(n2)

An algorithm is said to run in logarithmic time if its time execution is proportional to


the square of the input size. Examples:

 bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort

Definition of "big Omega"


We need the notation for the lower bound. A capital omega Ω notation is used in this
case. We say that f(n) = Ω(g(n)) when there exists constant c that f(n) ≥ c*g(n) for for
all sufficiently large n. Examples

 n = Ω(1)
 n2 = Ω(n)
 n2 = Ω(n log(n))
 2 n + 1 = O(n)

Definition of "big Theta"

To measure the complexity of a particular algorithm, means to find the upper and
lower bounds. A new notation is used in this case. We say that f(n) = Θ(g(n)) if and
only f(n) = O(g(n)) and f(n) = Ω(g(n)). Examples

 2 n = Θ(n)
 n2 + 2 n + 1 = Θ( n2)

Analysis of Algorithms

The term analysis of algorithms is used to describe approaches to the study of the
performance of algorithms. In this course we will perform the following types of
analysis:

 the worst-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by


the maximum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
 the best-case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by the
minimum number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
 the average case runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by
an average number of steps taken on any instance of size a.
 the amortized runtime complexity of the algorithm is the function defined by a
sequence of operations applied to the input of size a and averaged over time.

Example. Let us consider an algorithm of sequential searching in an array.of size n.


Its worst-case runtime complexity is O(n)
Its best-case runtime complexity is O(1)
Its average case runtime complexity is O(n/2)=O(n)

Amortized Time Complexity

Consider a dynamic array stack. In this model push() will double up the array size if
there is no enough space. Since copying arrays cannot be performed in constant time,
we say that push is also cannot be done in constant time. In this section, we will show
that push() takes amortized constant time.

Let us count the number of copying operations needed to do a sequence of pushes

You might also like