Minimum Wages Act
Minimum Wages Act
Minimum Wages Act
Minimum Wages act passed on 15th March 1948 it is divided into 2 schedule of employment part 1 and
part 2 part 1 contain 21 employment and part2 contain only agriculture sector
Essential Ingredient
1. Wage should be by way of remuneration
2. It should be capable of being expressed in terms of
3. It should be payable to a person employed in respect of his employment or of work done in such
employment.
4. It should be payable to a
5. It should be payable if the terms of employment, express or implied, are fulfilled.
6. It includes house rent allowance.
7. It does not include house accommodation, supply of light, water, medical attendance, traveling allowance,
contribution of employer towards provident fund, gratuity , any scheme of social insurance etc.
8.
IMPORTANT provisions IN BRIEF:
Appropriate Government shall fix the minimum rates of wages in respect of the employment specified in
Part-I or II of the Schedule and review at such intervals not exceeding (5) years, to revise the wages.
1. Time Rate – The minimum rate is fixed according to the duration of the work
done by the labor.
2. Piece Rate – Here the minimum wage is fixed by the total number of pieces
manufactured in the factory.
3. Overtime Rate – Here the minimum rate is fixed by the overtime done by the
labor regardless of the time or piece rate.
Section 5: Minimum rate of wages:
(a)appoint as many committees and sub-committees as it considers necessary to hold enquiries and
advise it in respect of such fixation or revision, as the case may be, or
(b)by notification in the Official Gazette, publish its proposals for the information of persons likely to be
affected thereby and specify a date, not less than two months from the date of notification, on which
the proposals will be taken into consideration.
Appropriate Government shall appoint an Advisory Board to advise the Government in the matters of
fixing and revising of minimum wages and for coordinating the work of Committees and Sub Committees
appointed under Section 5. The term of office of the non-official member
The Committees/sub committees/Advisory Board shall consist of persons representing in equal number,
the employers and the employees and independent persons not exceeding 1/3rd of the total members,
one of them to be nominated as chairman.
Section 12: Payment of Minimum rates of wages:
Wages paid in respect of scheduled employments shall not be less than the minimum rates of wages.
The number of hours of work should not exceed (9) per day including rest for half an hour and 48 per
week and a day of rest in every(7) days normally on Sunday shall be allowed.
Registers like muster roll and wages register shall be maintained by the employer as per the prescribed
forms under the Rules.
Appropriate Government shall appoint Inspectors under the Act to enforce the provisions of the Act.
Govt. of Telangana appointedLOs,ACLs,DCLs,JCLs and COL and also officers of certain other departments
as Inspectors.
The appropriate Government shall appoint authorities to hear and decide claims for difference in wages
and compensation up to ten times the amount of difference in wages. As per the pecuniary jurisdiction
the ACL can hear claims up to 50,000/-, DCL above 50,000/ and up to 2,00,000/- and JCL above
2,00,000/-, which has been fixed in 1999 and requires revision.
Any contract of employment with terms for reduced wages shall be null and void to that extent.
The appropriate Government by giving notification in the OfficialGazette may add any employment to
the Schedule under Part-I or II.
1. The Act does not violate Article 19 of the Constitution: The constitutional validity of the
Act was challenged in the cases of U. Unichonoy vs State of Kerala and Gulmuhommad
Tarasaheb vs State of Bombay. The parties challenged that this law restricted
their Article 19(1)(g), as it puts a restriction on freedom of trade. But, the court held in
favour of the Act. It was held that, in the absence of any such Act, the employers will
pay wages, arbitrarily.
2. The Act does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution: It was contended that the Act
violates the ‘equal protection of laws’ clause. However, the court ruled that the Act does
not violate Article 14 in the case of Bhikusa Yamasa Kshatriya vs Sangammar Akola Bidi
Kamgar Union.
In the case between the State of Madras and P.N. Ram Chander Rao in
1956, the court ruled that any notification not specifying the manner and what
interval special allowance made payable to be adjusted is a defect and impaired by
an apparent error of law.
In the case between Cashew Manufacturers and Exporters Association v/s
State of Kerala in 1999, the high court ruled that the government is not bound by
the Advisory Board’s report.
In the case between S.D. Basha and the State of Madras, it was held that in a
condition where the members appointed into the committee are bereft of
knowledge and experience, such a committee shall be invalid. A committee with
men of no knowledge and experience is illegal.