0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views21 pages

Material Balances: Dr. M. Coley

Here are the key pros and cons of each process: Process A: Pros: - Smaller reactor size required - Less stringent reaction conditions (lower temps, pressures) Cons: - Requires multiple passes through reactor - Additional pumps, piping for recycle - Longer total reaction time Process B: Pros: - Single pass conversion, no recycle needed - Shorter total reaction time Cons: - Much larger reactor size - More extreme reaction conditions (higher temps, pressures) required - Higher capital costs due to larger equipment The determining factors would be a detailed economic analysis weighing capital costs vs operating costs, as well as safety

Uploaded by

Toanique Headman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views21 pages

Material Balances: Dr. M. Coley

Here are the key pros and cons of each process: Process A: Pros: - Smaller reactor size required - Less stringent reaction conditions (lower temps, pressures) Cons: - Requires multiple passes through reactor - Additional pumps, piping for recycle - Longer total reaction time Process B: Pros: - Single pass conversion, no recycle needed - Shorter total reaction time Cons: - Much larger reactor size - More extreme reaction conditions (higher temps, pressures) required - Higher capital costs due to larger equipment The determining factors would be a detailed economic analysis weighing capital costs vs operating costs, as well as safety

Uploaded by

Toanique Headman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

Material Balances

Lecture 4

Dr. M. Coley

1
Use of “Tie Elements”
 Tie element:
 substance that enters a process in the feed &
passes out in the product unchanged.
 Substance is easy to keep track of.

 Problem:
A batch of leather consisting of 38 wt% “bone dry”
leather & 62% H2O is dried to give 900 lb of dry
leather that contains 7% H2O.
Calculate:
i) the weight of wet leather fed to the process.
ii) lbs of H2O removed per lb of bone dry leather.
2
Solution – Tie Element Approach
 Tie element is BDL
 Basis: 100 lb dry leather

P DL (900 lb)
WL DRIER
38% BDL
F 93% BDL
7% H2O
62% H2O

W
100% H2O

3
Solution – Tie Element Approach 2
 Express basis as a function of tie element.
 100 lb DL = 93 lb BDL

 100 lb DL = 1
93 lb BDL
 Relate other streams to tie element.
 38 lb BDL = 100 lb WL

38 lb BDL = 1
100 lb WL
4
Solution – Tie Element Approach 3
 Using dimensional equations:

 100 lb DL x 38 lb BDL
93 lb BDL 100 lb WL

0.408 lb DL = 1 lb WL
900 lb DL = (900/0.408) lb WL = 2203 lb WL
2203 lb WL fed to drier.
5
Solution – Tie Element Approach 4
 Wgt of H2O removed during drying:

2203 - 900 = 1303 lb


Wgt of BDL in process = 0.93 x 900 lb = 837 lb

Or Wgt. BDL = 0.38 x 2203 = 837 lb

Wgt of H2O removed/lb of BDL = (1303/837)


= 1.55 lb H2O/lb BDL. 6
Solution – Algebraic Approach
 Basis:
Overall mass balance: F = P + W

 Component mass balance:


 BDL: 0.38F = 0.93P
F = (0.93/0.38) x 900 = 2203 lb
W = F - P = 2203 - 900 = 1303 lb.
BDL = 0.38 x 2203 = 837 lb.
(1 lb H2O/1 lb BDL) = 1303/837 = 1.55 7
Recycle Process

8
Recycle Process
 Return of material that has already been through an
operating unit so as to reprocess or re-use it.

 Common practice used to:


 Increase yield
 Enrich products
 Conserve heat
 Improving general operations

 Un-consumed fraction of the gross product is usually


re-introduced for re-processing & called the recycled stock.

 For analysis, take material balances around points of


mixing. 9
Recycle Process

Total Net
Fresh Gross
Feed
P Product S product
Feed

Recycle stock

Purge

P = processor 10

S = separator
Recycle: Process without
chemical reaction
 Example:

A distilation column separates 10,000 lb/hr of a 50%


acetic acid/50% H2O mixture. The product recovered
from the top of the condenser contains 95% acetic
acid & the bottoms contain 96% H2O. The stream
entering the condenser from the top (V), is 8000 lb/hr.
A portion of the product is returned to the column as
reflux & the rest is withdrawn as product. Find the
ratio of the amount of reflux, (R), to the product
withdrawn, assuming streams R, V and D have the
same composition.
11
Diagram of the Process
V = 8000 lb/hr

condenser
R
D
Column 95% AcOH
F = 10,000 lb/hr
5% H2O
50% AcOH
50% H2O

4% AcOH
W 96% H2O
12
Calculations – Algebraic Method
 Basis: 1hr of operation (10,000 lb feed)
 Overall mass balance: F = D + W
10,000 = D + W
Component balance:
AcOH: 0.5 x 10,000 = 0.95D + 0.04W
= 0.95(10,000 – W) + 0.04W
0.91W = 4500
W = 4500/0.91) = 4,950 lb
D = 10,000 - 4,950 lb
= 5050 lb 13
Calculations – Algebraic Method
 Balancing around the condenser:
 Overall mass balance: V = R + D
R = 8000 - 5050 lb
= 8000 - 5050 lb
= 2950 lb

R/D = 2950/5050 R/(R + D) = 0.37


= 0.58
R/D – important measure of efficiency
Reflux ratio (R/R + D) = 0.37
14
value should be <0.5 for efficient process
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
 Problem:
Ether is prepared industrially by the acid
dehydration of ethanol as shown in the
schematic diagram. If the ether plant
produces 2500 lb/hr of ether and achieves
85% conversion per pass, determine:
(i) the feed rate
(ii) the recycle to feed ratio (R/F).

15
Recycle with Chemical Reaction

85% H2SO4
15% H2O

F Ether P
Reactor
90% EtOH still 100% Ether
10% H2O 2500 lb/hr

R EtOH
90% EtOH still
10% H2O
H2SO4
H2O 16

W
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
 Equation:
H2SO4
2CH3CH2OH CH3CH2OCH2CH3 + H2O

Basis: 1 hr of operation

a) From equation:
a) 2 lb-mole EtOH = 1 lb-mole Et2O
b) 1 lb-mole Et2O = 74 lb Et2O

b) 1 lb-mole Et2O = 1

74 lb Et2O 17
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
2500 lb Et2O = 2500 lb Et2O x 1 lb-mole Et2O
74 lb Et2O

P = 33.8 lb-mole Et2O


= 33.8 x 2 lb-mole EtOH = 67.6 lb-mole EtOH
Since 1 lb-mole EtOH = 46 lb EtOH

46 lb EtOH = 1
1 lb-mole EtOH
Ethanol in feed:
46 lb EtOH x 67.6 lb-mole EtOH = 3109.6 lb EtOH
18
1 lb-mole EtOH
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
0.9F = 3109.6 lb EtOH
F = 3455.1 lb
hence: Feed Rate = 3455.1 lb/hr

b) 85% conversion means 15% EtOH unused


Component balance on EtOH:
0.15(0.9F + 0.9R) = 0.9R
NB: 15% of combined feed is unused = EtOH in R stream.
0.15(3109.6) + 0.135R = 0.9R
466.44 = 0.765R
19
R EtOH = 609.7 lb
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
 Recycle ratio:
Recycled stock = 100/90 x 609.7 = 677.4 lb

R/F = 677.4/lb/3455.1

= 0.196

R/FEtOH = 609.7/3109.6
= 0.196
20
Recycle with Chemical Reaction
 Consider:
 Process A achieves 10% single pass conversion but
99% of the unreacted feed gas is captured by a
separator & recycled to the reactor. Net result is that
95% of feed entering the reactor is converted.
 Process B operates on the same principles as
Process A but is scaled to achieve 95% conversion.
 Discuss the pros & cons of both processes. What
factors would determine which process is adopted?
 Scheme 2 requires large throughput & hence much larger reactor volume & possibly, much
higher pressure & temperatures. Scheme 1 requires longer total reaction time, additional pumps
& piping but smaller reactor & less stringent reaction conditions. Careful analysis of the
economics & safety requirements would determine the decision made.

You might also like