0% found this document useful (0 votes)

183 views1,071 pages

Grade 12 Assessment Summary Report

This document contains a summary of achievement levels for students at Saint Paul Vocational and Industrial High School for the first quarter. It shows that 89 students mastered subjects, 63 were closely approximating mastery, and 38 were moving towards mastery. At the competency level, 14 competencies were mastered, 15 were closely approximating mastery, and 13 were moving towards mastery. It also includes overall proficiency levels for a summative exam on the strand of Zinc.

Uploaded by

Evelyn Paguigan

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

183 views1,071 pages

Grade 12 Assessment Summary Report

Uploaded by

Evelyn Paguigan

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 1071

SCHOOLS DI

SHS-ELECTRONIC
LS DIVISION OFFICE OF ISABE
TRONIC ASSESSMENT DATA GATHERING TEM
SABELA
NG TEMPLATE
FLEXIBLE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF ACHIEV
SCHOOL : SAINT PAUL VOCATIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT: SAN PABLO DISTRICT
GRADE LEVEL: 12
RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER
TRACK: ACADEMIC

SHS DASHBOARD

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS

CLASS SUMMARY PER SUBJECT NO. OF PUPIL Closely Moving
Mastered % Aproximating % Towards
TESTED Mastery Mastery
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
ORAL COMMUNICATION 22 0 0.00 0 0.00 10
SHS- CS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 9 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 10 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 11 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 12 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 14 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 15 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 16 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 1 36 21 58.33 15 41.67 0
SHS- AS 2 36 2 5.56 32 88.89 2
SHS- AS 3 36 5 13.89 5 13.89 26
SHS- AS 4 1 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 1 36 36 100.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 2 36 25 69.44 11 30.56 0
SHS- SS 3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 4 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 9 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 10 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 11 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 12 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
TOTAL 89 6.87 63 4.86 38

TOTAL NUMBER OF CO
NO. OF Closely Moving
CLASS SUMMARY PER COMPETENCY COMPETENCY Mastered % Aproximating % Towards
Mastery Mastery
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
ORAL COMMUNICATION 5 0 0.00 0 0.00 1
SHS- CS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 9 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 10 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 11 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 12 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 13 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 14 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 15 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- CS 16 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 1 4 1 25.00 3 75.00 0
SHS- AS 2 7 0 0.00 7 100.00 0
SHS- AS 3 13 0 0.00 1 7.69 12
SHS- AS 4 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- AS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 1 11 11 100.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 2 6 2 33.33 4 66.67 0
SHS- SS 3 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 4 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 5 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 6 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 7 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 8 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 9 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 10 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 11 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
SHS- SS 12 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
TOTAL 46 14 4.40 15 6.93 13
#REF!
PREPARED BY:
NAME
DESIGNATION
ARY OF ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL

TYPE OF EXAM: SUMMATIVE EXAM

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021
STRAND: ZINC

MBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

% Average % Low % Very Low % Absolutely No %

Mastery Mastery Mastery Mastery

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
45.45 12 54.55 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
5.56 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
72.22 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 1 100.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3.42 13 4.29 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

AL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

Average Low Very Low Absolutely No
% Mastery % Mastery % Mastery % Mastery %

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
20.00 4 80.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
92.31 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00
3.12 4 2.22 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

NOTED:
NAME
DESIGNATION
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT:

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
14 0

15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
35 0

36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES

thering Tool specifically designed to gauge Learning Outcomes across Learning Areas and Grade Levels during the Quarter 1 of
ded entries with the desired data based on the Summative Assessments(Content and Performance) to generate Learners’ Maste
for each of the Most Essential Learning Competencies.

y is the percentage score on test items(based on a summative Content/ Performance tests during the Unit or Quarterly Assessment) un
ber of items answered correctly under each competency x 100% T
Total number of items in the competency

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT:

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

Describe how communication is influenced by 1 2 3

media and information
1 3
MIL11/12IMILIIIa-1

Identify the similarities and differences

between and among media literacy,
2 0
information literacy, and technology literacy
MIL11/12IMILIIIa-2

Discuss responsible use of media and

3 0
information

Explain how the evolution of media from

4 traditional to new media shaped 0
the values and norms of people and society
Explain how the evolution of media from
4 traditional to new media shaped 0
the values and norms of people and society

Compare and contrast how one particular

issue or news is presented
5 0
through the different types of media (print,
broadcast, online)

Contrast indigenous media to the more

6 common sources of information 0
such as library, internet, etc.

Present an issue in varied ways to disseminate

7 information using the 0
codes, convention, and language of media

Cite practical situation when to apply

8 knowledge in intellectual property, 0
copy right, and fair use guideline

Create a campaign add to combat digital

9 0
divide, addiction, and bullyin

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 3

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

35 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT:

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

Self-assesses health-related fitness (HRF). statu

1 0
PEH12FH-Ig-i-6

Sets FITT goals based on training principles to

achieve and/or maintain HRF
2 0
PEH12FH-Ii-j-7

Engages in moderate to vigorous physical

activities (MVPAs) for at least 60 minutes most
days of the week in a variety of settings in- and
3 out-of school 0
PEH12FH-Ia-t-8

Analyzes physiological indicators such as heart

rate, rate of perceived exertion and pacing
associated with MVPAs to monitor and/or
4 0
adjust participation or effort
PEH12FH-Ik-t-9
Analyzes physiological indicators such as heart
rate, rate of perceived exertion and pacing
associated with MVPAs to monitor and/or
4 0
adjust participation or effort
PEH12FH-Ik-t-9

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT:

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

Discuss the nature, goals and perspectives

1 in/of anthropology, sociology and political 0
science

Analyze the concept, aspects and changes

2 0
in/of culture and society

Explain the importance of cultural

3 relativism in attaining cultural 0
understanding

Analyze the significance of cultural, social,

4 0
political and economic symbols and practices
Analyze the significance of cultural, social,
4 0
political and economic symbols and practices

Explain the context, content, processes, and

5 0
consequences of socialization

Analyze the forms and functions of social

6 0
organizations

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

SECTION: ZINC

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: STEM
SUBJECT: ORAL COMMUNICATION

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

4 5 7 10 15 17 24 30
1 Explains the functions, nature and process of communicatio 15
34 36 38 39 40

1 2 3 6 8 9 18 22
Uses various strategies in order to avaoid
2 communication breakdown
8

11 12 21 29 35 37
Examines sample oral communication
3 6
activities

23 25
Differentiates the various models of
4 2
communication
Differentiates the various models of
4 2
communication

13 14 16 20 26 27 28 31
5 Identifies the various types of speech context 18
43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

6 0

27 0

TOTAL 49

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered

Closely Aproximating Mastery

Moving Towards Mastery

Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

NDUSTRIAL HIGH SCHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: ABIGAIL L. PONCE

POSITION: TEACHER II

SCHOOL HEAD: CHANITO G. GAZZINGA

POSITION: PRINCIPAL III

RATING PERIOD: QUARTER 1

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 22

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

32 33 17 12 13 6 13 15 11 17 17 8 77.3 54.5 59.1 27.3 59.1 68.2

14 15 17 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 63.6 68.2 77.3 72.7 59.1 0.0

14 17 20 14 16 17 17 11 0 0 63.6 77.3 90.9 63.6 72.7 77.3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

14 12 13 9 11 13 0 0 0 0 63.6 54.5 59.1 40.9 50.0 59.1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59.1 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

41 42 15 12 17 14 16 11 9 17 18 13 68.2 54.5 77.3 63.6 72.7 50.0

9 14 18 12 13 17 11 18 0 0 40.9 63.6 81.8 54.5 59.1 77.3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
LEARNERS % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY COMPETENCY %

0 0.00 Mastered 0 0.00

0 0.00 Closely Aproximating Mastery 0 0.00
10 45.45 Moving Towards Mastery 1 2.04
12 54.55 Average Mastery 4 8.16
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
IGAIL L. PONCE

ACHER II

ANITO G. GAZZINGAN

INCIPAL III

ARTER 1

20-2021

22 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

during the Quarter 1 of school year

enerate Learners’ Mastery Level

uarterly Assessment) under each learning competency.

esponses by Item number % PROFICIENCY LEVEL

0.00 0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

OFICIENCY LEVEL

0.00
0.00
2.04
8.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 6

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 7

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 8

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 9

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 10

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 11

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 12

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 13

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 14

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 15

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- CS 16

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

SECTION: ABM

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: ABM
SUBJECT: SHS- AS 1

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 2 3 4 11 13 27 26
1 explore job opportunities for entrepreneurship a 10

Recognize a potential market 5 6 7 21 24 29 35 36

2 15

Week 3-6 TLE_ICTAN11/12PC-Ia-1 44 45 46 47 48

Select the best product or service that will 16 17 18 19 28 30 31 32

3 meet the market need. 10
(CS_EP11/12ENTREP-0d-6)

9 10 12 14 49 20 22 23
recognize the importance of Marketing Mix
4 15
TLE_ICTAN11/12EM-Ia
recognize the importance of Marketing Mix
4 15
TLE_ICTAN11/12EM-Ia
8 15 39 40 50

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 50

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

CHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: MONALIZA M. QUILALA

POSITION: T-II

SCHOOL HEAD: JULIETA M. DOMINGO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL IV

RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 36

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

42 43 36 36 34 35 36 34 35 35 35 35 100.0 100.0 94.4 97.2 100.0 94.4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

37 41 34 32 35 32 34 34 34 31 32 35 94.4 88.9 97.2 88.9 94.4 94.4

34 31 31 35 36 0 0 0 0 0 94.4 86.1 86.1 97.2 100.0 0.0

33 34 35 32 31 36 34 34 35 34 32 35 97.2 88.9 86.1 100.0 94.4 94.4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

25 38 33 32 33 34 35 35 36 36 33 35 91.7 88.9 91.7 94.4 97.2 97.2

34 35 35 33 36 0 0 0 0 0 94.4 97.2 97.2 91.7 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

LEARNERS COMPETENCY
21 58.33 Mastered 1 2.00
15 41.67 Closely Aproximating Mastery 3 6.00
0 0.00 Moving Towards Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Average Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
ONALIZA M. QUILALA

LIETA M. DOMINGO

INCIPAL IV

RST QUARTER

20-2021

36 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

SECTION: ABM

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: ABM
SUBJECT: SHS- AS 2

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 2 3 22 23 36 37
Nabibigyang-kahulugan ang
1 7
akademikong pagsulat

Nakikilala ang iba’t ibang akademikong 4 5 6 24 25 38 39

sulatin ayon sa:
2 7
(a) Layunin (b) Gamit
(c) Katangian (d) Anyo

Nakapagsasagawa ng panimulang 7 8 9 26 27 40 41
pananaliksik kaugnay ng kahulugan,
3 7
kalikasan, at katangian ng iba’t ibang
anyo ng sulating akademiko

10 11 12 28 29 42 43
Nakakasusulat nang maayos na
4 7
akadamikong sulatin
Nakakasusulat nang maayos na
4 7
akadamikong sulatin

Nakasusunod sa istilo at teknikal na 13 14 15 30 31 44 45

5 pangangailangan ng akademikong 7
sulatin

16 17 18 32 33 46 47
Nakasusulat ng talumpati batay sa
6 7
napakinggang halimbawa

Natutukoy ang mahahalagang 19 20 21 34 35 48 49 50

7 impormasyon sa isang pulong upang 8
makabuo ng sintesis sa napag-usapan

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 50

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

CHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: RABIA ORINA

POSITION: T-II

SCHOOL HEAD: JULIETA M. DOMINGO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL IV

RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 36

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

36 35 35 34 35 36 30 0 0 0 100.0 97.2 97.2 94.4 97.2 100.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

31 34 30 28 31 36 33 0 0 0 86.1 94.4 83.3 77.8 86.1 100.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

31 35 36 30 36 35 32 0 0 0 86.1 97.2 100.0 83.3 100.0 97.2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 35 26 36 36 35 36 0 0 0 97.2 97.2 72.2 100.0 100.0 97.2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 34 29 33 25 35 36 0 0 0 97.2 94.4 80.6 91.7 69.4 97.2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

34 32 36 34 36 30 36 0 0 0 94.4 88.9 100.0 94.4 100.0 83.3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 35 29 29 29 36 34 35 0 0 97.2 97.2 80.6 80.6 80.6 100.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

LEARNERS COMPETENCY
2 5.56 Mastered 0 0.00
32 88.89 Closely Aproximating Mastery 7 14.00
2 5.56 Moving Towards Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Average Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
BIA ORINA

LIETA M. DOMINGO

INCIPAL IV

RST QUARTER

20-2021

36 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

SECTION: ABM

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: ABM
SUBJECT: SHS- AS 3

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

Describes characteristics, strengths,

1 2 3
weaknesses, and kinds of quantitative
1 research 3
CS_RS12-Ia-c-1

Illustrates the importance of quantitative resear 4 5 6

2 3

CS_RS12-Ia-c-2

Differentiates kinds of variables and their uses 7 8 9 10

3 CS_RS12-Ia-c-3 4

Designs a research used in daily life 11 12 13

4 CS_RS12-Id-e-1 3
Designs a research used in daily life
4 CS_RS12-Id-e-1 3

Writes a research title 14 15 16

5 CS_RS12-Id-e-2 3

Describes background of research 17 18 19

6 CS_RS12-Id-e-3 3

States research questions 20 21 22

7 CS_RS12-Id-e-4 3

Indicates scope and delimitation of study 23 24 25

8 3
CS_RS12-Id-e-5

Presents written statement of the problem 26 27 28

9 3
CS_RS12-Id-e-7

Illustrates and explain the conceptual 29 30 31 32

framework
10 4
CS_RS12-If-j-6

Defines terms used in study 33 34 35 36

11 CS_RS12-If-j-7 4

Lists research hypothesis (if appropriate) 37 38 39 40

12 CS_RS12-If-j-8 4

Presents written review of related literature and 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

conceptual framework
13 10
CS_RS12-If-j-9

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 50

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

CHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: ROLEZA M. MAGNO

POSITION: T-III

SCHOOL HEAD: JULIETA M. DOMINGO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL IV

RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 36

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

34 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94.4 69.4 69.4 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

29 28 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80.6 77.8 80.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

28 28 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 77.8 77.8 83.3 86.1 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

30 29 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83.3 80.6 77.8 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

30 32 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83.3 88.9 80.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

28 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77.8 83.3 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

29 31 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80.6 86.1 83.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

28 31 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77.8 86.1 80.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

30 29 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83.3 80.6 86.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

30 32 29 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 83.3 88.9 80.6 86.1 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

31 31 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 86.1 86.1 83.3 86.1 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

29 32 29 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 80.6 88.9 80.6 88.9 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

49 50 30 33 29 33 29 33 31 36 35 36 83.3 91.7 80.6 91.7 80.6 91.7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

LEARNERS COMPETENCY
5 13.89 Mastered 0 0.00
5 13.89 Closely Aproximating Mastery 1 2.00
26 72.22 Moving Towards Mastery 12 24.00
0 0.00 Average Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
LEZA M. MAGNO

LIETA M. DOMINGO

INCIPAL IV

RST QUARTER

20-2021

36 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

OFICIENCY LEVEL

0.00
2.00
24.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- AS 4

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- AS 5

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- AS 6

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- AS 7

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- AS 8

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

SECTION: ABM

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: ABM
SUBJECT: SHS- SS 1

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

explain the major role of financial management 1 2 3 4 5

and the different individuals involved
1 5
ABM_BF12-IIIa-1

distinguish a financial institution from financial 6 12 13 15 7

instrument and financial market
2 5
ABM_BF12-IIIa-2

explain the flow of funds within an organization

– through and from the enterprise—and the 8 9 10 11 14
3 role of the financial manager 5
ABM_BF12-IIIa-5

identify the steps in the financial planning 16 17 20 23 24

process
4 5
ABM_BF12-IIIc-d-10
identify the steps in the financial planning
process
4 5
ABM_BF12-IIIc-d-10

illustrate the formula and format for the

preparation of budgets and projected financial 18 19 21 22 26
statement
5 5
ABM_BF12-IIIc-d-11

explain tools in managing cash, receivables, 25 27 28 29 30

and inventory
6 5
ABM_BF12-IIIc-d-12

compare and contrast the loan requirements of 31 32 33 34

the different banks and nonbank institutions
7 4
ABM_BF12-IIIe-f-14

calculate future value and present value of 35 36 37 38

money
8 4
ABM_BF12-IIIg-h-18

compute loan amortization using mathematical 39 40 41 42

concepts and the present value tables
9 4
ABM_BF12-IIIg-h-20

apply mathematical concepts and tools in

computing for finance and investment 43 44 45 46
10 problems 4
ABM_BF12-IIIg-h-21

explain the risk-return trade-off 47 48 48 50

11 ABM_BF12-IIIg-h-22 4

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 50

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

CHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: EZRA KENNETH JUAN

POSITION: T-II

SCHOOL HEAD: JULIETA M. DOMINGO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL IV

RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 36

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

LEARNERS COMPETENCY
36 100.00 Mastered 11 22.00
0 0.00 Closely Aproximating Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Moving Towards Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Average Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
RA KENNETH JUANGA

LIETA M. DOMINGO

INCIPAL IV

RST QUARTER

20-2021

36 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

SECTION: ABM

TRACK: ACADEMIC

STRAND: ABM
SUBJECT: SHS- SS 2

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 2 3 4 5 6 11 12
Differentiate economics as social science and
1 applied science 9
in terms of nature and scope

14 16 18 20 21 7 8 9
*Examine the utility and application of applied
2 economics to 8
solve economic issues and problems

Analyze market demand, market suppy and 17 19 22 23 24 26 28 30

3 market 8
equilibrium

Determine the impications of market pricing on 18 21 22 25 27 29 31 33

4 economic 9
decision-making
Determine the impications of market pricing on
4 economic 9
decision-making
Differentiate various market structures in terms
of:
a. number of sellers 32 42 43 44 45 49 50 37
5 b. types of products 8
c. entry/exit to market
d. pricing power
e. others
*Analyze the effects of contemporary economic 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 46
6 issues affecting 8
the Filipino entrepreneur

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 50

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

CHOOL ADVISER/TEACHER: EZRA KENNETH JUAN

POSITION: T-II

SCHOOL HEAD: JULIETA M. DOMINGO

POSITION: PRINCIPAL IV

RATING PERIOD: FIRST QUARTER

SCHOOL YEAR: 2020-2021

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 36

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

13 36 36 36 36 35 34 35 34 33 0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 97.2 94.4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

30 34 35 36 36 35 35 35 0 0 83.3 94.4 97.2 100.0 100.0 97.2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 32 34 36 35 33 35 34 0 0 97.2 88.9 94.4 100.0 97.2 91.7

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 35 36 34 36 35 34 33 33 32 0 97.2 100.0 94.4 100.0 97.2 94.4

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

35 35 36 36 34 36 34 34 0 0 97.2 97.2 100.0 100.0 94.4 100.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

33 32 34 34 32 36 34 33 0 0 91.7 88.9 94.4 94.4 88.9 100.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

LEARNERS COMPETENCY
25 69.44 Mastered 2 4.00
11 30.56 Closely Aproximating Mastery 4 8.00
0 0.00 Moving Towards Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Average Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Very Low Mastery 0 0.00
0 0.00 Absolutey No Mastery 0 0.00
RA KENNETH JUANGA

LIETA M. DOMINGO

INCIPAL IV

RST QUARTER

20-2021

36 TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS: 50

OFICIENCY LEVEL

4.00
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 3

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 4

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 5

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 6

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 7

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 8

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 9

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 10

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 11

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 0

2 0

3 0

4 0
4 0

5 0

6 0

7 0

8 0

9 0

10 0

11 0

12 0

13 0

14 0
15 0

16 0

17 0

18 0

19 0

20 0

21 0

22 0

23 0

24 0

25 0
25 0

26 0

27 0

28 0

29 0

30 0

31 0

32 0

33 0

34 0

35 0
36 0

37 0

38 0

39 0

40 0

41 0

42 0

43 0

44 0

45 0

46 0
46 0

47 0

48 0

49 0

50 0

51 0

52 0

53 0

54 0

55 0

56 0

57 0
57 0

58 0

59 0

60 0

61 0

62 0

63 0

64 0

65 0

66 0

67 0

68 0
68 0

69 0

70 0

71 0

72 0

73 0

74 0

75 0

76 0

77 0

78 0

79 0
79 0

80 0

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
SCHOOL:

DISTIRCT:

GRADE LEVEL:

SECTION:

TRACK:

STRAND:

SUBJECT: SHS- SS 12

SHS DASHBOARD SCORES TAB SUMMARY TAB

Direction: Below is an Assessment Results Gathering Tool specifically

2020-2021. Fill out the unshaded entries with the des
for e

Note: Proficiency Level of each learner per learning competency is the percentage score
Proficiency Level = Number of items answered co

MELCS No. of Items Placement of Items

1 Objetive 1 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
2 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

3 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

4 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation
4. Describes the relationship between the
4 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

5 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

6 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

7 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

8 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

9 0
inequalities

10 10.You can edit here… 0

11 11. yyyyyy 0

12 12. You can edit this area 0

13 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
14 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula
3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic
15 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

16 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

17 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

18 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

19 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

20 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

21 0
inequalities

22 10.You can edit here… 0

23 11. yyyyyy 0

24 12. You can edit this area 0

25 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
26 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

27 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

28 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

29 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

30 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

31 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

32 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

33 0
inequalities

34 10.You can edit here… 0

35 11. yyyyyy 0
36 12. You can edit this area 0

37 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
38 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

39 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

40 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

41 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

42 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

43 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

44 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

45 0
inequalities

46 10.You can edit here… 0

47 11. yyyyyy 0

48 12. You can edit this area 0

49 11. yyyyyy 0

50 12. You can edit this area 0

51 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
52 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

53 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

54 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

55 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

56 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

57 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

58 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

59 0
inequalities

60 10.You can edit here… 0

61 11. yyyyyy 0

62 12. You can edit this area 0

63 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
64 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

65 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

66 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

67 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

68 0
equations and rational algebraic equations
6. Solves problems involving quadratic
68 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

69 7. Illustrates quadratic inequalities 0

70 8. Solves quadratic inequalities 0

9. Solves problems involving quadratic

71 0
inequalities

72 10.You can edit here… 0

73 11. yyyyyy 0

74 12. You can edit this area 0

75 1. Illustrate quadratic equations 0

2. Solve quadratic equations by: (a) extracting

squareroot;
76 0
(b) factoring; (c) Completing the square; (d)
using the quadratic formula

3. Characterizes the roots of a quadratic

77 0
equation using the discriminant

4. Describes the relationship between the

78 coefficients and the roots of a quadratic 0
equation

5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic

79 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)
5. Solves equations transformable to quadratic
79 equations (including rational algebraic 0
equations)

6. Solves problems involving quadratic

80 0
equations and rational algebraic equations

TOTAL 0

TOTAL NUMBER OF LEARNERS BY PROFIC

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Mastered
Closely Aproximating Mastery
Moving Towards Mastery
Average Mastery
Low Mastery
Very Low Mastery
Absolutey No Mastery
SHS TEST RESULT ANALYSIS

ADVISER/TEACHER:

POSITION:

SCHOOL HEAD:

POSITION:

RATING PERIOD:

SCHOOL YEAR:

NUMBER OF EXAMINEES 800

Total Number of Correct Responses by Item

Items Percentage of Correct Responses by Item numbe
number

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

F LEARNERS BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF COMPETENCY BY PROFICIENCY LEVEL

NUMBER OF % LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY NUMBER OF %

OFICIENCY LEVEL

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Offerletter Infinity Applicationid 529 46202111739370
No ratings yet
Offerletter Infinity Applicationid 529 46202111739370
3 pages
Primark - Full Factory List (En) - 2023
No ratings yet
Primark - Full Factory List (En) - 2023
75 pages
Siam Reiki Level 1 TBSRL1
No ratings yet
Siam Reiki Level 1 TBSRL1
41 pages
Assessment in School
No ratings yet
Assessment in School
3 pages
University of Cebu-Main: Philippine Popular Culture
No ratings yet
University of Cebu-Main: Philippine Popular Culture
145 pages
Test Construction
100% (2)
Test Construction
24 pages
DepEd Order # 8, S. 2015
100% (3)
DepEd Order # 8, S. 2015
60 pages
Batangas State University ARASOF-Nasugbu
No ratings yet
Batangas State University ARASOF-Nasugbu
6 pages
Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation Guide
No ratings yet
Continuous Comprehensive Evaluation Guide
32 pages
K-12 Grading System Field Study
No ratings yet
K-12 Grading System Field Study
8 pages
Exercise 1 - ASL 2
No ratings yet
Exercise 1 - ASL 2
4 pages
Learning Assessment 1
100% (1)
Learning Assessment 1
43 pages
Classroom Assessment Tool Development
No ratings yet
Classroom Assessment Tool Development
3 pages
The Prayer: Video
No ratings yet
The Prayer: Video
35 pages
Learning Episode 8
No ratings yet
Learning Episode 8
8 pages
Teacher Assessment Guide
No ratings yet
Teacher Assessment Guide
6 pages
Grading Guidelines for Teachers
No ratings yet
Grading Guidelines for Teachers
53 pages
AL 2 Prelim Exam PDF
No ratings yet
AL 2 Prelim Exam PDF
4 pages
Making Sense of Assessment Data
No ratings yet
Making Sense of Assessment Data
24 pages
Diagnostic Assessment
No ratings yet
Diagnostic Assessment
6 pages
FS 5 Episode 8
61% (41)
FS 5 Episode 8
15 pages
7 AP Aqua
No ratings yet
7 AP Aqua
76 pages
Prof Ed 6 2
No ratings yet
Prof Ed 6 2
6 pages
Interim Guidelines For Assessment and Grading
100% (1)
Interim Guidelines For Assessment and Grading
47 pages
Definition of Assessment: Eng. Ed. 11
No ratings yet
Definition of Assessment: Eng. Ed. 11
33 pages
40 - ITEMS ANALYSIS - Competency Analysis Template-Final
No ratings yet
40 - ITEMS ANALYSIS - Competency Analysis Template-Final
58 pages
Edu 601 Reviewer P2
No ratings yet
Edu 601 Reviewer P2
18 pages
Assessment For Learning
100% (1)
Assessment For Learning
27 pages
Pop 2 Math Sac - Sandy Yang
No ratings yet
Pop 2 Math Sac - Sandy Yang
2 pages
Verrier Elwin, Sarat Chandra Roy - The Agaria (1992, Oxford University Press, USA)
No ratings yet
Verrier Elwin, Sarat Chandra Roy - The Agaria (1992, Oxford University Press, USA)
383 pages
Designing Performance Assessments
No ratings yet
Designing Performance Assessments
12 pages
Math Sac Chart
No ratings yet
Math Sac Chart
2 pages
K-12 Classroom Assessment Guide
No ratings yet
K-12 Classroom Assessment Guide
9 pages
PE - GRADE 5 - Quarter 2
No ratings yet
PE - GRADE 5 - Quarter 2
84 pages
Madrid Vs Mapoy
No ratings yet
Madrid Vs Mapoy
2 pages
AP - GRADE 5 - Quarter 3
No ratings yet
AP - GRADE 5 - Quarter 3
84 pages
Test Result Analysis
No ratings yet
Test Result Analysis
1 page
Mapeh 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
No ratings yet
Mapeh 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
103 pages
Classroom Management
No ratings yet
Classroom Management
57 pages
Esp 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
No ratings yet
Esp 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
102 pages
What Is Mathematics
No ratings yet
What Is Mathematics
3 pages
Araling Panlipunan 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
No ratings yet
Araling Panlipunan 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
96 pages
English 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
No ratings yet
English 1 Quarter 4. - Gadget - 2022-Revised-V.2.1.2023
102 pages
EDUC80REVIEWER
No ratings yet
EDUC80REVIEWER
14 pages
Healthy Living Tips for Kids
No ratings yet
Healthy Living Tips for Kids
2 pages
Hyster 330Y
100% (1)
Hyster 330Y
20 pages
Ivey Business School Private Equity - Bus9452 Course Syllabus and Outline MBA 2021 5 Elective Period
No ratings yet
Ivey Business School Private Equity - Bus9452 Course Syllabus and Outline MBA 2021 5 Elective Period
5 pages
LOADING SEQ - Iron Ore 4
100% (1)
LOADING SEQ - Iron Ore 4
1 page
Cloud Computing Proposal for Newspaper
No ratings yet
Cloud Computing Proposal for Newspaper
10 pages
Temenggong Securities LTD & Anor V Registrar of
100% (2)
Temenggong Securities LTD & Anor V Registrar of
7 pages
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
No ratings yet
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
53 pages
Loader: Big Data Huawei Course
No ratings yet
Loader: Big Data Huawei Course
11 pages
Smaw TCR
No ratings yet
Smaw TCR
9 pages
Company Profile: Board of Directors
No ratings yet
Company Profile: Board of Directors
6 pages
6 DO 8 S. 2015 Classroom Assessment
No ratings yet
6 DO 8 S. 2015 Classroom Assessment
43 pages
Chapter 1 - 1.2 Deped Policies On Assessment Especially On Mathematics
No ratings yet
Chapter 1 - 1.2 Deped Policies On Assessment Especially On Mathematics
20 pages
Grade 1 Assessment Data Tool
No ratings yet
Grade 1 Assessment Data Tool
52 pages
12 NOV 2024 Parvinder Sir
No ratings yet
12 NOV 2024 Parvinder Sir
78 pages
Anti-Sexual Harassment Guide
No ratings yet
Anti-Sexual Harassment Guide
14 pages
Lesson 7
No ratings yet
Lesson 7
32 pages
Dementia Care Case Studies
No ratings yet
Dementia Care Case Studies
3 pages
The Light in The Abyss
No ratings yet
The Light in The Abyss
2 pages
Daily Lesson Log
No ratings yet
Daily Lesson Log
10 pages
FINAL TERM LESSON 4 Utilization of Assessment Data 12 14 2024
No ratings yet
FINAL TERM LESSON 4 Utilization of Assessment Data 12 14 2024
11 pages
Approaches and Trends in Educational Assessment
No ratings yet
Approaches and Trends in Educational Assessment
67 pages
Vani Ganapathy
No ratings yet
Vani Ganapathy
2 pages
Law Courses and Faculty List
No ratings yet
Law Courses and Faculty List
131 pages
Speeding Mitigation Plan
No ratings yet
Speeding Mitigation Plan
2 pages
First Topic in Assessment of Learning 2
No ratings yet
First Topic in Assessment of Learning 2
19 pages
Pubmed Microneedl Set
No ratings yet
Pubmed Microneedl Set
3 pages
Frankenstein: Rewriting Analysis
No ratings yet
Frankenstein: Rewriting Analysis
24 pages
Mechanical Properties of Solids
No ratings yet
Mechanical Properties of Solids
34 pages
P.D. No. 223
No ratings yet
P.D. No. 223
1 page
Solution Unit Test 1 Calculus 1
No ratings yet
Solution Unit Test 1 Calculus 1
3 pages
Assessment in Learning
No ratings yet
Assessment in Learning
64 pages
Assessment in Learning 2 (Assess 2)
No ratings yet
Assessment in Learning 2 (Assess 2)
4 pages
Wolves Back Day
No ratings yet
Wolves Back Day
1 page
Test Construction
No ratings yet
Test Construction
23 pages
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
No ratings yet
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
76 pages
FILIPINO
No ratings yet
FILIPINO
76 pages
MAPEH
No ratings yet
MAPEH
76 pages
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
No ratings yet
GADGET (Generative Assessment Data Gathering Electronic Tool)
76 pages
BULAKIN ES GRADE-6-Level-of-Mastery
No ratings yet
BULAKIN ES GRADE-6-Level-of-Mastery
33 pages
Final Assessment Framework Model Question Paper Computer Science HSSC-I
No ratings yet
Final Assessment Framework Model Question Paper Computer Science HSSC-I
32 pages
Random Dynamical Systems in Finance Anatoliy Swishchuk Shafiqul Islam Download
No ratings yet
Random Dynamical Systems in Finance Anatoliy Swishchuk Shafiqul Islam Download
89 pages
ARTS Grade-3 Quarter 2. GADGET 2022-Revised-V.2
No ratings yet
ARTS Grade-3 Quarter 2. GADGET 2022-Revised-V.2
76 pages
Assessment Reviewer Final
No ratings yet
Assessment Reviewer Final
5 pages
Algorithms and Models For The Web Graph Anthony Bonato Download
No ratings yet
Algorithms and Models For The Web Graph Anthony Bonato Download
175 pages