A Self-Instructional Module On Mathematics in The Modern World
A Self-Instructional Module On Mathematics in The Modern World
Modern World
2021 Edition
Course Code
#XXXX-XXXX
Course Name/Title
Name of Faculty
Knowledge
1.Discuss and argue about the nature of mathematics, what it is, how it is expressed,
represented, and used.
2.Use different types of reasoning to justify statements and arguments made about
mathematics and mathematical concepts.
Skills
5.Analyze codes and coding schemes used for identification, privacy, and security
purposes.
6.Use mathematics in other areas such finance, voting, health and medicine, business,
environment, arts and design, and recreation.
Attitudes
According to the Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei, “[The universe] cannot be read
until we have learned the language and become familiar with the characters in which it is
written. It is written in mathematical language.” If mathematics is considered as a
language, then as all other ordinary languages, mathematics is independent of the other
and there is no need to rely on another language to be understood. (Silver, 2017)
In this chapter, you will encounter several facets of logic. Specifically, you will use
logic to
WHAT IS LOGIC.
Logic is a systematic way of thinking that allows us to deduce new information from
old information and to parse the meanings of sentences. You use logic informally
everyday life and certainly also in doing mathematics. For example, suppose you are
working with a certain circle, call it “Circle X,” and you have available particularly to pieces
of information.
2.If any circle ha radius r, the its area is 𝜋𝑟2 square units
Logical Statements
2.) Anyone who takes Math in the Modern World is a General Education
student.
Example 3: Here are some examples of statements. They are all true.
Example 4: Here are some additional statements. They are all false.
5=3
{0,1,2}
Example 5: Here we pair sentences or expressions that are not statements with
expressions that are statements.
NOT Statements: Statements:
42 42 is not number.
Example 6: We will often use letters P, Q, R, and S to stand for specific statements.
When more letters are needed, we can use subscripts. Here are more statements,
designated with letters. You decide which of them are true and which are false.
6
𝑆 1: Ζ ⊆ ∅
This is a sentence that is true. (All multiples of 6 are even, so no matter which a multiple
of 6 the integer 6 happens to be, it is even). Since the sentence P is definitely true, it is a
statement. When a sentence or statement contains a variable such as x, we sometime
denote x as P(x) to indicate that it is saying something about x. Thus, the above
statement can be denoted as
A statement or sentence involving two variable’s might be denoted P(x ,y ) and so on.
It is quite possible for a sentence containing variables to not be a statement. Consider the
Is this a statement? Whether it is true or false depends on just which integer x is. It is true
if x = 4 and false if x =7, etc. But without any stipulations on the value of x it is impossible
to say whether Q(x) is a true or false. Since it is neither definitely true, nor definitely false.
Q(x) cannot be a statement. A sentence such as this, whose truth depends on the value
of one or more variables, is called open sentence.
The variables in an open sentence (or statement) can represent any type of entity, not
just numbers.
Here is an open sentence where the variables are function:
This open sentence is true if f(x) = 2x and g(x) =𝑥2. It is false if f(x)= 𝑥3 and g(x) = 𝑥2, etc.
We point out that a sentence such as R(f, g) (that involves variables) can be denoted
7
either as R(f, g) or just R. We use the expression R(f, g) when we want to emphasize that
the sentence involves variables.
We will have more to say about open sentences later, but for now let’s return to
statements.
Statements are everywhere in mathematics. Any result or theorem that has been proved
true is a statement.
The quadratic formula and the Pythagorean theorem are both
𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑥 .
2𝑎
Q: If a right triangle has legs of lengths a and b and hypotenuse of length c, then
𝑐 2 = 𝑎 2 + 𝑏 2.
Here is another statement famous enough to named. It was first posed on the eighteenth
century by the German mathematician Christian Goldbach, and thus it called Goldbach
conjecture.
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Activity 1: Logical Statements
Name: GC3:
Mathematics in the Modern World
CNU ID No.: Date:
_______________________________________________________________________
_____
Directions. Decide whether or not the following are statements. In the case of a
statement, say if it is true or false, if possible.
1. Every real number is an even integer.
2. Every even integer is a real number.
8
• Negation of p: ~p (not p)
Conjunction
The word “and” can be used to combine two statements to form a new statement.
Consider for example the following sentence.
Disjunction
Statements can also be combined using the word “or”. Consider the following statements.
𝑆1: 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛 𝒐𝒓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 3 𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑑𝑑.
In mathematics, the assertion "𝑃 or 𝑄” is always understood to mean that one or both of 𝑃
or 𝑄 is true. Thus statements 𝑆1, 𝑆2, 𝑆3 are all true, while 𝑆4 is false. The symbol ∨ is used
to stand for the word “or”. So, if 𝑃 and 𝑄 are statements, 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 represents the statement
”𝑃 or 𝑄”. Here is the truth table.
Disjunction
𝑎 𝑏 𝑎∨𝑏
Symbol: ∨
T T T
Interpretation: 𝑎 ∨ 𝑏 means “a or b” T F T
Vocabulary: a and b are the conjuncts in the compound F T T
proposition 𝑎 ∨ 𝑏. F F F
10
Negation
To conclude this section, we mention another way of obtaining new statements from old
ones. Given any statement 𝑃, we can form the new statement “It is not true that 𝑃”. For
example, consider the following statement.
𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛.
This statement is true. Now change it by inserting the words “It is not true that” at the
beginning:
It is not true that 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛.
This new statement is false.
For another example, starting with the false statement “2 ∈ ∅ .”, we get the true statement
“It is not true that 2 ∈ ∅. "
We use the symbol ~ to stand for the words “It is not true that,” so ~𝑷 means “It is
not true that 𝑷. " Unlike ∧ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ∨, combine two statements, the symbol ~ just alters a
single statement. Thus, it truth table has just two lines, one for each possible truth value
of 𝑷.
Truth table for negation
𝑷 ~𝑷
The statement ~𝑷 is called the negation of 𝑷. The negation of a
T F
specific statement can be expressed in numerous ways. Consider F T 𝑃:
𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛.
Here are several ways of expressing its negation.
~𝑷: 𝐼𝑡′𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛.
~𝑷: 𝐼𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛.
~𝑷: 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 2 𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Activity 2: Logical Connectives
Name: GC3: Mathematics in the Modern
World
CNU ID No.: Date:
11
_______________________________________________________________________
_____
Directions. Express each statement or open sentences in one of the form 𝑝 ∧ 𝑞, 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞, or
~𝑝. Be sure to also state exactly what statements 𝑝 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟.
1. The number 8 is both even and a power of 2.
2. The matrix A is not invertible.
3. 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦
4. 𝑥 < 𝑦
5. 𝑦 ≥ 𝑥
6. There is a quiz scheduled for Wednesday or Friday.
7. The number x equals to zero, but the number y does not.
8. At least one of the numbers x and y equals 0.
9. Happy families are al alike, but each unhappy family is unhappy In its own way.
10. A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
End
_______________________________________________________________________
______________ Conditional Statements
There is yet another way to combine two statements. Suppose we have in mind a specific
integer a. Consider the following statement about a.
𝑅: 𝐼𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 6, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑏𝑦 2.
We immediately spot this as a true statement based on our knowledge of integers and
the meaning of the words “if” and “then.” If integer a is a multiple of 6, then a is even, so
therefore a is divisible by 2. Notice that 𝑅 is built up from two simpler statements.
𝑃: 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑜𝑓 6.
𝑄: 𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑏𝑦 2.
𝑅: 𝐼𝑓 𝑃, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑄.
the formula 𝑎 → b, the proposition a is referred to as the hypothesis (or sometimes as the
premise). The proposition b is referred to as the conclusion.
The truth values for implication seem pretty peculiar at first. However, the truth values do
correspond exactly to the way that mathematicians use this symbol. The only time an
implication is false is when the hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false. False may
imply false and false may imply true, but true can not imply false.
In mathematics, whenever we encounter the construction If P, then Q it means exactly
what the truth table for → expresses. But, of course there are other grammatical
constructions that also mean 𝑃 → Q. Here is a summary of the main
ones.
𝐼𝑓 𝑃, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 Q.
𝑄 𝑖𝑓 𝑃
𝑄 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑃.
𝑃 → Q. 𝑄, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑃.
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑃, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑜 Q.
𝑃 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑄.
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑄, 𝑖𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑃.
________________________________________________
___________________________________
Activity 3: Conditional Statements
Name: GC3: Mathematics in the Modern
World
CNU ID No.: Date:
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Directions. Without changing their meanings, convert each of the following sentences into
a sentence having the form “If P, then Q. "
1.A matrix is invertible provided that its determinant is not zero.
2.For a function to be continuous, its is sufficient that it is differentiable.
3.A function is rational if it is a polynomial.
4.Whenever a surface has only one side, it is non-orientable.
5.A series converges whenever it converges absolutely.
6.Whenever people agree with me I feel I must be wrong.
7.You fail only if you stop writing.
8.An integer is divisible by 8 only if it is divisible by 4.
End
13
_______________________________________________________________________
__________
Biconditional Statements
===================================================================
==============
Conditiona Biconditional
𝑝 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 𝑷 ↔ 𝐐,
T T T T T
T F T F F
F T F T F
F F F F F
Step 2. Now, use the truth values from the 𝑝 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝑠 to
produce the truth values for 𝑞 as shown in the rightmost
column of the following table.
𝑝 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞
T T F T
T F F F
F T T T
F F T T
Step 3. Negate the truth values in the 𝑞 column to produce the following.
𝑝 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞
T T F T F
T F F F T
F T T T F
F F T T F
Step 4. As our last step, we form the disjunction of with q and place the
results in the rightmost column of the table
𝑝 𝑞 𝑝 𝑞 .
T T F T F T
T F F F T T
F T T T F T
F F T T F F
row 1
row 2 row 3
row 4
b.In row 2 of the above truth table, we see that when 𝑝 is true and 𝑞 is false the
statement
𝑞 in the rightmost column is true.
Compound statements that involve exactly three simple statements require a standard
truth table form of
𝟐𝟑 = 𝟖 𝑟𝑜𝑤𝑠 , 𝑎𝑠 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑤𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤.
b. Use the truth table from part a to(𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) ∧ ( ∽ 𝑟 ∨ 𝑞). determine the truth value of (𝑝 ∧ 𝑞)
∧
( ∽ 𝑟 ∨ 𝑞). Given that 𝑝 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑒.
Solution:
a. Using the procedures developed in Example 7, we can produce the truth
table for (𝑝 ∧ 𝑞) ∧ ( ∽ 𝑟 ∨ 𝑞).
Solution:
Construct two truth tables and compare the results. The truth table below show that that
∽ ( 𝑝 ∨∽ 𝑞) 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ∽ 𝑝 ∧ 𝑞 have the same truth values for all possible truth values of their
simple statement.
Thus, the statements are equivalent.
17
𝑝 𝑞 ∽ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑝 𝑞) 𝑞
∽
T T F T T T T F F T
T F F T T T F F F F
F T T F F F T T T T
F F F F T F F T F F
4 1 3 1 3 2
• Tautology is a statement form which is true for all values of statement variables.
Solution: We’ll check that the main connective column in the truth table for 𝑝 ∨∽ 𝑝
contains only Ts.
𝑝 ∽𝑝 𝑝 ∨ ∽𝑝
T F T T F
F T F T T
Solution: We’ll check that the main connective column in the truth table for 𝑝 ∧∽ 𝑝
contains only Fs.
𝑝 ∽𝑝 𝑝 ∧ ∽𝑝
T F T F F
F T F F T
Solution: We’ll check that the main connective column in the truth table for 𝑝 → 𝑞 contains
at least one T and at least one F.
𝑝 𝑞 𝑝 → 𝑞
T T T T T
18
T F T F F
F T F T T
F F F T F
===================================================================
==============
Activity 5: Truth Tables, Equivalent Statements, Tautology
Name: GC3: Mathematics in the Modern
World
CNU ID No.: Date:
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Do as directed.
1.Construct a truth table for (𝑝 ∧∽ 𝑞) ∨ ( ∽ 𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)
End
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Analysis of Arguments
We see examples of informal arguments every day. In newspaper editorials, court cases,
and advertising, people give lists of reasons and try to convince us of a conclusion.
Here's a formal version of the process.
An argument is a list of premises which taken all together supposedly imply a conclusion.
For example,
P1
P2
P3
…
20
Pn
----------------------------------
Pn+1 is an argument.
We say that an argument (like the one above) is logically valid if and only if (P1 ^ P2^ P3
^ … ^ P n) →
Pn+1 is a tautology. Note that the conclusion of a logically valid argument is not
necessarily true. Logical validity ensures only that if all the premises are true, then the
conclusion is true.
Example 14. Show that the following argument is logically valid.
p
p→ q
__________________
Q
Solution: We build the truth table to check.
p ∧ (p → q) → q
T T T T T T T
T F T F F T F
F F F T T T T
F F F T F T F
It is a tautology; the argument is logically valid. (Modus Ponens)
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Activity 6: Conditional and Related Statements and Analysis of Arguments
Name: GC3: Mathematics in the Modern World
CNU ID No.: Date:
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
Do as directed.
1. (p ∧ 𝑟) → (s ∨ q).
2. If Waldo likes trout, then Elmer is a sailor
3. If 0 ≠1, then 4 is a prime.
-----------
r
3. Hypothetical Syllogism:
p→q
q→ r
-----------
p→r Commented [g1]:
4. Disjunctive Syllogism:
s∨t
C.Show that they are all logically valid. (using truth table)
1. Modus Tollens: a→b b ----------- a
2. Constructive Dilemma:
p→
r q
→ r
p∨q
∽s
-------
---- t
Rules of Inference:
𝒑𝟑: “If we don’t go swimming, then we will take a canoe trip.” 𝑟→𝑠
𝒑𝟒: “If we will take a canoe trip, then we will be home by sunset.” 𝑠→𝑡
23
_______________________________________________________________
_____________
Conclusion: “We will be home by sunset.”
t Solution:
Statements Reasons
1. ∽𝑝∧𝑞 1. Premise
2. ∽𝑝 2. Simplification rule using (1)
3. 𝑟→𝑝 3. Premise
4. ∽𝑟 4. Modus Tollens (MT) using (2,3)
5. ∽𝑟→𝑠 5. Premise
6. 𝑠 6. Modus Ponens (MP) using (4,5)
7. 𝑠→𝑡 7. Premise
8. t 8. Modus Ponens (MP) using (6,7)
This is a valid argument showing that from the given premise, we can prove the
conclusion t.
Solution:
Statements Reasons
1. 𝑝→𝑞 1. Premise
3. ∽ 𝑝 → 𝑟 3. Premise
7. ; 𝑞 → s 7. Premise
“Someone who passed the first examination has not read a book.”
Solution:
• C(x): “x is in this class”
• B(x): “x has read the book”
• P(x): “x has passed the first examination”
Then, Premises:
∃𝒙(𝑪(𝒙) ∧∽ 𝐵(𝑥)).
∀𝒙(𝑪(𝒙) → 𝑃(𝑥)).
Conclusion: ∃𝒙(𝑪(𝒙) ∧∽ 𝐵(𝑥)).
===================================================================
==============
too glad to do their work and fly. This murder had, on the contrary, been done
most deliberately, and the perpetrator has left his tracks all over the room,
showing he had been there all the time.”
From these, Sherlock Holmes concluded: “It was a woman”.
Solving a murder case:
Known premises:
• If it’s a robbery, something would have been taken.
• Nothing was taken.
• If it’s not a robbery, it must be politics or a woman.
• It it’s politics, the assassin would have left immediately.
• If assassin left tracks all over the room, he cannot have left immediately.
• The assassin left tracks all over the room.
Show the conclusion: “It was a woman”.
Problem 2. Use rules of inference to show whether the following argument is valid
or invalid.
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
______________________________________________________________
V REFERENCES
Hirst, Jeffry L. and Hirst, Holly P. (2015) A Primer for Logic and Proof 2015 Edition
Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd (2018) Philippine Edition Mathematics in Modern World.
REX Bookstore, Manila, Philippines
Tannenbaum, P. (2018). Excursions in Modern Mathematics, Pearson Education, Inc.
Hammack, Richard (2013) Book of Proof. Department of Mathematics and Applied
Mathematics, Virginia
Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
Arguments and Proofs. https://www.youtube.com/results?
search_query=arguments+and+Proofs
Rules of Inference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1uKpC1qalQ
Validity of Arguments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX-Xe8xV6bA
Mathematics in the Modern World https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngUotonNTNY
VI MODULE EVALUATION
Kindly make use of this portion to express freely how you feel about this module as a
basis for its improvement and future revision.
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
28
_______________________________________________________________________
______________
______________________________________________________